The following invention relates to debris preclusion systems for roof gutters, often referred to as gutter guards. More particularly, this invention relates to filter screen mesh type gutter guards which have a fine mesh of material to preclude leaves and other debris from falling into the gutter, while allowing water to filter through the mesh and into the gutter.
Gutters are commonly used along eaves at a lower end of a sloping roof to catch water running off of the roof and channel that water into particular areas rather than allowing the water to merely fall from the roof. Such gutters often become clogged, especially when trees are located nearby and shed leaves which can end up in the gutters. Accordingly, leaf preclusion systems, often called “gutter guards,” are known in the prior art for attachment over the gutters. Such gutter guards serve the basic purpose of allowing water to pass into the gutter but precluding leaves and other debris from passing into the gutter.
One type of gutter guard utilizes a filter layer which has small openings therein which allow water to pass through but which preclude leaves and other debris from passing therethrough. One example of such a prior art mesh based leaf preclusion system is in U.S. Pat. No. 7,310,912, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The phenomena of water tension and molecular cohesion tend to cause water to not want to pass through such mesh layers, but rather to cling to the mesh. These forces thus frustrate the ability of mesh based gutter guards to allow water to pass through the mesh while precluding debris from passing into the gutter. With known prior art mesh based gutter guards, commonly an underlying support is provided beneath the mesh. This underlying support serves two purposes. First, it keeps the mesh generally planar overlying the gutter. Second, it contacts an underside of the mesh providing a path along which water can flow while adhering to the underlying support. Holes in the underlying support then allow water to drop through in larger drops where the weight of the drops is sufficient that the surface tension and adhesion forces cannot resist such dropping.
While effective, such mesh based gutter guards with underlying supports require a two part structure to operate effectively. These two parts increase the cost to manufacture the separate parts as well as adding additional assembly steps to produce the final gutter guard product. Many consumers benefit from having a simpler and potentially lower cost alternative which can still function effectively to preclude leaves and other debris from collecting within a gutter. With this invention such a leaf preclusion system is provided with a simple single part construction which can still effectively filter leaves and other debris out while allowing water to pass into the gutter and have the structural support needed to maintain its position overlying the gutter.
With this invention, a leaf preclusion system is provided for a gutter which includes a filter layer, such as formed of stainless steel mesh, which filters out debris (e.g. leaves) while allowing water to pass therethrough. Uniquely, no underlying support is required beneath the filter member. The filter member is itself imbued with properties of sufficient stiffness and the ability to overcome water droplet adhesion characteristics without requiring an underlying support. Strength is provided to the filter member by providing a corrugated form of either an undulating sinusoidal nature or a zig-zag toothed nature, or other cross-section. Such a cross-section for the mesh causes the mesh to have greater strength particularly in resisting bending. These corrugations extend perpendicular to a long axis of the gutter and parallel with a direction that water is migrating off of the roof. Thus, these corrugations greatly resist flexing along the gutter where the mesh would otherwise be most susceptible to bending.
When water runs off of the roof and lands on the corrugated mesh material, debris is kept from passing through the small openings in the mesh. Water does tend to adhere to this mesh but is drawn by gravity down into the troughs between crests in the corrugated mesh material. As the water is concentrated in these troughs, the water collects into drops sufficiently large that the weight of the water drops exceeds adhesion forces and surface tension forces so that the water drops.
To further enhance the channeling of the water down into the gutter, a lower strip is optionally provided which acts as a form of dam to stop the water if it migrates entirely to a lower end of each trough and diverts the water down into the gutter. This front strip of material, typically formed of a rigid or semi-rigid material such as aluminum, or a hydrocarbon polymeric plastic material can also provide a surface which can be used to fasten to a front lip of the gutter. In one form of the invention this strip can have a snapping clamp plate so that it can snap onto the front lip of the gutter so that fasteners are not required.
Beneficially, a bead of caulk material or other barrier can be bonded to the underside of the mesh along a line between (e.g. midway) upper and lower edges of the mesh. Such a barrier acts as an intermediate dam to cause water to collect and drop into the gutter.
An upper end of the filter material can merely be left bare and slip beneath shingles on the roof and above sheeting material underneath the shingles, and above any vapor barrier. Alternatively, an upper strip of rigid material, such as aluminum can be attached to the upper edge of the fine mesh filter material with a tab extending beneath the roof shingles and above underlying sheeting to ensure that water does not go underneath the leaf preclusion system, but rather the water remains on top of the tab and then on top of the mesh material.
Accordingly, a primary object of the present invention is to provide a system for precluding debris from passing into a roof gutter while allowing water to pass into the roof gutter.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a gutter debris preclusion system which is easy to attach to a gutter.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a gutter debris preclusion system for a gutter which can accommodate gutters of different sizes and shapes as well as roof configurations of different materials, pitches and other geometric characteristics.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a gutter debris preclusion system which has a small number of parts and simple form to keep costs thereof reduced, while still effectively precluding passage of debris into the gutter and while effectively drawing water down into the gutter.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a debris preclusion system for a rain gutter which is sufficiently rigid to prevent collapse when encountering loads such as debris loads thereon.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for precluding the passage of debris into a gutter.
Other further objects of the present invention will become apparent from a careful reading of the included drawing figures, the claims and detailed description of the invention.
Referring to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts throughout the various drawing figures, reference numeral IO is directed to a debris preclusion system mountable overlying an opening on p.n upper portion of a gutter G and behind a lip L of the gutter G. The gutter G is typically attached to a facia F along a lower edge of a roof R to capture water running off of shingles S supported over a moisture barrier M which is located upon plywood P or other sheeting material forming a structural surface of a roof R. The water runs down off of the shingles S and then down onto the debris preclusion system 10 overlying the gutter G. The system 10 is primarily formed of a fine mesh material so that the water can fall therethrough. The water will typically adhere to an underside of this corrugated mesh 20 (along arrow A of
In essence, and with particular reference to
More specifically, and with particular reference to
Most preferably, the wire forming the corrugated mesh 20 extends in a pattern with some threads extending parallel with the upper edge 26 of the overall corrugated mesh 20 and some of the wire/thread extending perpendicular to the upper edge 26 of the corrugated mesh 20. In such a configuration, the corrugation can occur to create the crests 20 and troughs 24 with only the threads which run parallel with the upper edge 26 needing to be bent. In such a configuration the corrugating of the fine mesh material forming the corrugated mesh 20 can more readily occur and this material forming the corrugated mesh can more readily maintain this corrugated configuration during installation and use. Hole size between adjacent wires/threads for ing the corrugated mesh 20 can be selected according to various different design considerations including the debris present in the environment where the system is to be installed. Wire/thread diameter can also be adjusted to accommodate particular design characteristics desired for the overall system.
The corrugations in the corrugated mesh 20 preferably have an amplitude between crests 22 and troughs 24 between one-fourth and one-tenth of the length of the corrugated mesh 20 between the upper edge 26 and the lower edge 28 and similar to a width of the opening in the gutter G. This amplitude can be increased or decreased through experimentation or based on other design considerations to optimize performance of the system 10.
Preferably, these corrugations 20 are in a repeating pattern. This pattern is most preferably a zig-zag pattern, such as that depicted in
The amplitude of the corrugated mesh 20 is preferably constant throughout the corrugated mesh 20. Alternatively, it is conceivable that the corrugated mesh 20 could have its amplitude diminished or eliminated adjacent the upper edge 26 and lower edge 28. The upper edge 26 is preferably captured within a pocket 32 formed in the upper strip 30, if the upper strip 30 is provided. The lower edge 28 of the corrugated mesh 20 is preferably captured within a recess 42 in the lower strip 40, if the lower strip 40 is provided. The pocket 32 and recess 42 could be smaller in height if the corrugated mesh 20 is configured to taper to a lesser or zero amplitude at the upper edge 26 and lower edge 28. If desired, the corrugated mesh 20 could be configured to have a slightly looser weave that would then have this weave compressed adjacent the upper edge 26 and lower edge 28 when this amplitude is decreased, so that the overall corrugated mesh 20 would have a minimum of stress when having this amplitude change, and while still being corrugated and sufficiently tightly woven.
With particular reference to
This lower strip 40, 140 can have a variety of different configurations, such as those depicted in
The distance between the lower plate 44 and upper plate 43 preferably is similar to an amplitude of the corrugated mesh 20, or slightly less. Thus, the lower edge 28 of the corrugated mesh 20 can fit securely within the recess 42. Optionally, some form of adhesive or other fastener can be utilized to further secure the lower edge 28 of the corrugated mesh 20 within the recess 42. If fasteners are utilized, such fasteners could include staples, screws, rivets, pins, wire, clamps or other equivalent fastening means. If desired; holes can be provided in the lower plate 44 to prevent the recess 42 from becoming a reservoir for pooling of water therein.
As water runs down over the corrugated mesh 20 (along arrow A of
When these troughs reach the lower strip 40, this water will adhere to the lower plate 44 and then to a lower portion of the stop plate 45. With this efficient water collecting at a lower end of the stop plate 45, the water will release from the stop plate 45 as droplets D and fall (along arrow E of
Most preferably, a clamp plate 46 is provided generally opposite the lower plate 44 and extending generally laterally from the stop plate 45. This clamp plate 46 preferably is somewhat resilient and has a curving form generally matching a form of a typical lip L on a gutter G. The clamp plate 46 could have a variety of different configurations to accommodate lips L of different configurations. The clamp plate 46 is spaced from the upper plate 43 by a distance that causes the clamp plate 46 to flex slightly away from the upper plate 43 when pressed against the lip L of the gutter G and then snap toward the upper plate 43 to a closed position held to the lip L of the gutter G, and positioning the entire system 10 in the desired position over the gutter G and spanning from the lip L up to the roof R below the shingles S.
The upper plate 43 also provides the location where a fastener can be utilized to further secure the lower strip 40 to the gutter G. For instance, screws can pass through the upper plate 43 and then into the lip L to secure the system 10 in position on the gutter G. In addition, or alternatively, an adhesive can be utilized or some other form of fastener such as a rivet, nail, staple, pin or other lip L fastening means.
With particular reference to
This upper strip 30 most preferably is a rigid structure formed of an extrudable material such as aluminum which has a constant cross-section to make it suitable for extrusion. Alternatively, the upper strip 30 can be formed in some other manner and from other materials such as plastics.
The upper strip 30 preferably includes a pocket 32 sized to receive the upper edge 26 therein. Thus, the pocket 32 preferably has a height between a lower leg 34 and upper leg 35 which is similar in height to the amplitude between the crests 22 and troughs 24 of the corrugated mesh 20. A tab 36 extends away from the pocket 32 in a direction opposite the corrugated mesh 20. This tab 36 is preferably substantially planar and in a plane aligned with that of the corrugated mesh 20.
As an alternative, the tab 36 could be bendable or pre-configured with a bend relative to the plane in which the corrugated mesh 20 is configured. For instance, to accommodate different pitches of roofs, the tab 36 could either be bendable or pre-bent to an angle matching the pitch of the roof with which the system IO is to be installed. If such a bend were provided this bend could be directly adjacent the pocket 32 or could be spaced further from the pocket 32 depending on the width of the gutter G and other particular geometric characteristics of the roof R adjacent the facia F.
While the lower strip 40 is preferably provided as a unitary mass, it could be formed of separate parts that are then attached together. The pocket 32 is preferably sized so that the upper edge 26 of the corrugated mesh 20 fits by friction therein. Alternatively, fasteners can be provided or an adhesive to secure the upper edge 26 within the pocket
32. Options for such fastening means are similar to those described above with respect to holding the lower edge 28 of the corrugated mesh 20 within the recess 42 of the lower strip 40.
With particular reference to
The water initially follows planar portions of the corrugated mesh 20 between the crests 22 and the troughs 24 (along arrow B of
This disclosure is provided to reveal a preferred embodiment of the invention and a best mode for practicing the invention. Having thus described the invention in this way, it should be apparent that various different modifications can be made to the preferred embodiment without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention disclosure. When structures are identified as a means to perform a function, the identification is intended to include all structures which can perform the function specified. When structures of this invention are identified as being coupled together, such language should be interpreted broadly to include the structures being coupled directly together or coupled together through intervening structures. Such coupling could be permanent or temporary and either in a rigid fashion or in a fashion which allows pivoting, sliding or other relative motion while still providing some form of attachment, unless specifically restricted.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/096,126 filed Apr. 11, 2016 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/642,050, filed on Mar. 9, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/807,394, filed on Sep. 3, 2010, which is a non-provisional application conversion of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/277,441, filed on Sep. 23, 2009 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/275,943, filed on Sep. 4, 2009; and this application claims the benefit and priority to each of these applications, which are all incorporated in their respective entireties herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
546042 | Van Horn | Sep 1895 | A |
1732058 | Martini | Oct 1929 | A |
2229381 | Grow | Jan 1941 | A |
2288121 | Sandmeyer | Jun 1942 | A |
2583422 | Haddon | Jan 1952 | A |
2674961 | Lake | Apr 1954 | A |
3691343 | Norman | Sep 1972 | A |
3741398 | Abramson | Jun 1973 | A |
3925264 | Corte | Dec 1975 | A |
3950951 | Zukauskas | Apr 1976 | A |
4308696 | Schroeder | Jan 1982 | A |
4435466 | Kuhnel et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4435925 | Jefferys | Mar 1984 | A |
4646488 | Burns | Mar 1987 | A |
4745710 | Davis | May 1988 | A |
4755229 | Armanini | Jul 1988 | A |
4769526 | Taouil | Sep 1988 | A |
4827686 | Stamper | May 1989 | A |
4949514 | Weller | Aug 1990 | A |
4959932 | Pfeifer | Oct 1990 | A |
5010696 | Knittel | Apr 1991 | A |
5044581 | Dressler | Sep 1991 | A |
5107635 | Carpenter | Apr 1992 | A |
5109640 | Creson | May 1992 | A |
5127200 | Doran | Jul 1992 | A |
5257482 | Sichel | Nov 1993 | A |
5261195 | Buckenmaier | Nov 1993 | A |
5315090 | Lowenthal | May 1994 | A |
5391858 | Tourangeau | Feb 1995 | A |
5398464 | Jacobs | Mar 1995 | A |
5406754 | Cosby | Apr 1995 | A |
5459965 | Meckstroth | Oct 1995 | A |
5558705 | Keemer et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5617678 | Morandin | Apr 1997 | A |
5640809 | Iannelli | Jun 1997 | A |
5729931 | Wade | Mar 1998 | A |
5759255 | Venturini et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5878533 | Swanfeld | Mar 1999 | A |
5893240 | Ealer, Sr. | Apr 1999 | A |
6134843 | Tregear | Oct 2000 | A |
6194049 | Bindschedler-Galli et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194519 | Blalock et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205715 | Rex | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6225600 | Burris | May 2001 | B1 |
6341462 | Kiilk et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6598352 | Higginbotham | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607781 | Joedicke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6700098 | Wyatt et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6708452 | Tenute | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6759630 | Tenute | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6933007 | Fensel et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942419 | Knak | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944991 | Kim | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951077 | Higginbotham | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959512 | Cobb | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7104012 | Bayram | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7174688 | Higginbotham | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191564 | Higginbotham | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7241500 | Shiao et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7310912 | Lenney | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7448167 | Bachman | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7624541 | Gentry | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7913458 | Higginbotham | Mar 2011 | B2 |
D638920 | Ealer, Sr. | May 2011 | S |
7975435 | Lenney | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8033058 | Block | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8079183 | Lenney | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8479454 | Lenney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8572899 | Pearce et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
9021747 | Lenney | May 2015 | B2 |
20030046876 | Higginbotham | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030198736 | Fensel et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050072114 | Shiao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050279036 | Brochu | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060037252 | Gosse et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060117670 | Tsioris | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179723 | Robins | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196124 | Bachman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060213129 | Bachman | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060230687 | Ealer, Sr. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060277831 | Bachman | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283096 | Bachman | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070054129 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065640 | Joedicke | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094939 | Bachman | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107323 | Higginbotham | May 2007 | A1 |
20070199276 | Duque | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218251 | Jacobs | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220814 | Faulks | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234647 | Higginbotham | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070246449 | Bachman | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080187708 | Decker | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080248241 | Kalkanoglu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090056234 | Brochu | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064628 | Mellott et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090300995 | Nikolopoulos | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110056145 | Lenney | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067318 | Lenney et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110138698 | Neumann | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110253611 | Higginbotham | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120042579 | McCoy | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130160377 | Sager | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130160378 | Higginbotham | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140013702 | Pearce et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140263001 | Higginbotham | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
06-146506 | May 1994 | JP |
09228592 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000-008559 | Jan 2000 | JP |
1989-10803 | Jul 1989 | KR |
1989-23083 | Dec 1989 | KR |
1998-16228 | Jun 1998 | KR |
WO1999053157 | Oct 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180142476 A1 | May 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61275943 | Sep 2009 | US | |
61277441 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15096126 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15872483 | US | |
Parent | 14642050 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 15096126 | US | |
Parent | 12807394 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 14642050 | US |