This invention relates to pallet runners and pallets constructed using them for use in the storage and/or transport of goods and, more particularly, to a recyclable reinforced corrugated pallet and runner design.
Various objects have been used to handle, separate and support loads that are sorted, stored and transported in a stacked arrangement. The equipment that is primarily used for performing this stacking arrangement is a front-end loader, lift truck or forklift truck that raises the individual loads so that they can be stacked one on top of the other or on a rack. To separate the loads from each other or off of the floor a pallet or runners are positioned beneath the load so as to allow space for the insertion of the forks of the lift truck for moving and positioning the loads for sorting, storing and transporting.
Packaging has a need for pallets that are economically priced and ecologically feasible. An acceptable pallet must possess the strength to support their intended loads of 2,400 Kg and work with industry-accepted material handling equipment. It is also necessary that the pallet can resist immediate deterioration by atmospheric or ground/floor moisture. The smooth clean topside of the pallet top sheet and the bottom side of the bottom sheet provides a surface that will not damage packaging. This pallet invention is economically priced to new wood pallets.
The significant challenge packaging faces with the use of wood pallets is the additional cost both in terms of material and labor using a corrugated sheet to separate packaging from the wood pallet. Damage is done to packaging from the nails, staples or other fasteners used to manufacture wood pallets.
The pallet addresses the needs of industry by satisfying these key issues and overcomes the associated disadvantages and shortcomings of known corrugated pallet and runner designs. Design drawbacks include not being economical when compared to new wood pallets, their strength and rigidity under static and dynamic loading is insufficient to permit wide spread general usage for all types and distribution of goods. Such pallets often have excessive deflection and lack beam strength, which causes their sagging under loads, thereby making the handling, stacking and racking of the pallets impractical. Additionally, known paperboard pallet designs typically become compressed, crushed, milled off or damaged when used under loads unless the percentage of corrugated is increased in the runner dramatically. Other known corrugated pallet designs may lose up to 50 percent of its stacking strength during conditions of high humidity and moisture when the paperboard absorbs atmospheric or ground/floor moisture. The most significant obstacle facing known corrugated designs is the capital investment in equipment required to manufacture runners and pallets in separate markets economically that will perform like a wood pallet.
The typical wood pallet used with packaging consists of platforms having parallel runners longitudinally and or transversely secured to their undersides by means of nails, staples or other fasteners. Wood is used in the construction of pallets because it is extremely strong on a weight basis, easily machined with off the shelf tools and will not lose its strength when exposed to heat, moisture or humidity. Wood pallets have several major disadvantages that are environmental in nature. Increasing environmental awareness has become a significant factor in the packaging, transportation and shipping industries. Wood is difficult to readily recycle on site and often wood packaging or pallet components are finally disposed in landfills. Available landfill sites, however, are becoming full and are being closed. If landfill disposal is even available, dumping fees are prohibitive. The decreasing supply of readily available wood is raising the cost of such pallets, however, and such wooden pallets are heavy and bulky to transport.
In international shipment of goods, wooden pallets present additional environmental problems because they tend to serve as hosts for germs and bugs. As a result, pallets are often quarantined in another country according to governmental regulations or general precautionary practices to avoid the spread of undesirable insects, bugs or germs. This has proven to be very costly and a significant economic drawback. This pallet is exempt under ISPM regulations.
Thus, there is an increasing need for pallets that are economically and ecologically feasible. However, an acceptable pallet must possess the strength to support their intended loads particularly on a rack or conveyor and must be sufficiently durable to withstand repeated use including being lifted with a lift truck or the like while loaded. Further, desirably the pallet must resist deterioration by the elements of the weather. Moreover, an acceptable pallet must be competitively priced in the marketplace.
The design of the runner and pallet addresses the drawbacks evident in other known corrugated pallet designs. This includes a method to assemble the runners economically. 65% lighter than wood pallets so that CO2 emissions are reduced during transit, water resistant, ISPM compliant and are 100% recyclable in paperboard recycling systems available locally. The significant strength and increased load bearing capability allows the runner and pallet to resist compression or crushing when supporting heavy loads.
The construction of an one hundred percent recycled runner using two strips of paperboard positioned on the outside edge of a honeycomb block bonded with adhesive and covered with a die cut sheet spray coated with a refined petroleum and vegetable wax blend provides compression resistance and stability so that the runner does not buckle or crush when loaded. This invention combines three components into one design that offers beam strength, compression resistance and stability at a cost point that is not available with known corrugated runner designs. The two way or four way access feature with this design is commercially viable alternative to wood pallets while performing similar to a wood pallet.
This need is met by a corrugated pallet for supporting a load during transport and storage including at least: a series of spaced parallel two way access runners, each of the runners comprising the following components: a rectangular corrugated block; two paperboard strips; a die cut corrugated sheet using a C flute; a corrugated top sheet joined to the tops of the runners using adhesive applied to the horizontal upper surface of the runner; and a corrugated bottom sheet joined to the bottoms of the runners using adhesive to the horizontal bottom surface of the runner.
The need is also met by a corrugated pallet for supporting a load during transport and storage including at least: a series of spaced parallel four way access runners, having openings extending the entire width of the runner in a direction perpendicular to a longitudinal axis of the runner, each of the runners comprising the following components: three rectangular corrugated blocks; six paperboard strips; a die cut corrugated sheet using a C flute. a corrugated top sheet joined to the tops of the runners using adhesive applied to the horizontal upper surface of the runner; and a corrugated bottom sheet joined to the bottoms of the runners using adhesive to the horizontal bottom surface of the runner.
In another aspect corrugated pallet further includes at least a sprayed coating of a petroleum and vegetable wax blend over the completed pallet.
The need is also met by a method for preparing a corrugated runner for a corrugated pallet including at least the steps of: preparing a die cut corrugated sheet comprising five joined parallel segments, with the second and fourth segments having extended end flaps; spray coating an adhesive on the interior side of the die cut corrugated sheet, coating all five joined parallel segments and their end flaps; glueing a rectangular corrugated block on the second segment of the die cut corrugated sheet; placing strips of paperboard onto the first and third parallel and adhesively coated segments; folding and pressing said first and third parallel segments with attached strips of paperboard against said rectangular corrugated block on the second segment of the die cut corrugated sheet; pressing the adhesively coated fourth parallel segment against the top of said rectangular corrugated block, allowing the adhesively coated fifth parallel segment to wrap over the top and cover the outside of the first parallel segment; pressing two adhesively coated end flaps down on each end of the assembled runner to provide double coverage of the ends.
The runner is now prepared for final assembly. As seen in
Assembly of an embodiment of a final pallet 300 is then completed by first coating the top and bottom of the runners with adhesive and then spacing at least three runners 305 across and between a top 320 and bottom 310 corrugated sheet as shown in
In another embodiment,
Because it is often advantageous to be able to access pallets from all sides a second embodiment of the instant invention is also proposed. Instead of an extended runner as proposed in
The short block runner is now prepared for final assembly. As seen in
Assembly of one embodiment of a final 4-way entry pallet is then completed by first coating the top and bottom of the short block runners with adhesive and then spacing at least three runners across and between a top and bottom corrugated sheet as shown by the pallet 340 in
Similarly, for added strength an alternate pallet can be prepared as shown by numeral 350 in
In all of the pallet embodiments of
While the invention has been described above with references to specific embodiments thereof, it is apparent that many changes, modifications and variations in the materials, arrangements of parts and steps can be made without departing from the inventive concept disclosed herein. Accordingly, the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims are intended to embrace all such changes, modifications and variations that may occur to one of skill in the art upon a reading of the disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/809,470, filed Jan. 10, 2013, now allowed but not issued, which was a national stage filing of PCT application PCT/IB2011/002193, filed Jul. 7, 2011, which claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional application 61/399,242, filed Jul. 9, 2010. Each application identified above is incorporated here by reference in its entirely to provide continuity of disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2709559 | Geisler | May 1955 | A |
2716532 | Wysong, Jr. et al. | Aug 1955 | A |
2928638 | Parker | Mar 1960 | A |
3006590 | Hoag | Oct 1961 | A |
3425367 | Oravez | Feb 1969 | A |
3952672 | Gordon et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
5129329 | Clasen | Jul 1992 | A |
5230291 | Juvik-Woods | Jul 1993 | A |
5285731 | McIntyre | Feb 1994 | A |
5385103 | Juvik-Woods | Jan 1995 | A |
5433156 | Hutchison | Jul 1995 | A |
RE35131 | Youell, Jr. et al. | Dec 1995 | E |
5517926 | Young, Jr. | May 1996 | A |
5531165 | Taravella et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531166 | Woods et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5595125 | Bridges, Jr. | Jan 1997 | A |
6095061 | Perazzo | Aug 2000 | A |
6357364 | Maloney et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6736074 | Pistner et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
8601955 | Casey et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020189507 | Benner | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040045486 | Pistner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060236899 | Nelson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060243172 | Simon | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080163800 | Reilly et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140041557 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61399242 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13809470 | US | |
Child | 14057487 | US |