Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The following is a tabulation of some prior art that presently seems relevant:
This invention relates to the manufacture of corrugated paperboard boxes in compliance with the National Motor Freight Classification Item 222 and the National Railroad Freight Committee's Uniform Freight Classification Rule 41 standards for box manufacture.
This invention particularly relates to the manufacturing of corrugated paperboard boxes with Edge Crush Test certification under these standards
Corrugated paperboard boxes are used to safely ship products throughout the United States and the world. Items ranging from lightweight and small, to heavy and large are safely transported in corrugated paperboard boxes.
The ability to safely transport this large range of items in paperboard boxes is assured because corrugated paperboard boxes are manufactured to comply with the National Motor Freight Classification Item 222 and the National Railroad Freight Committee's Uniform Freight Classification Rule 41 standards for box manufacture.
To comply with the standards, corrugated paperboard boxes are required to be tested by either an Edge Crush Test, or a Burst Test to certify their durability and strength. A small square is cut from a finished box and the appropriate test is performed. The resulting Edge Crush Test rating in lbs. /inch, or the Burst Test rating in lbs. is printed in a box-makers certificate on each box, certifying the strength of the finished boxes, as required by Rule 41 of the Uniform Freight Classification of the railroads and the nearly identical Item 222 of the National Motor Freight Classification.
Historically, for nearly a century, the only standard test was the Burst (Mullen) Test, which is indirectly related to a carton's ability to withstand external or internal forces to contain and protect a product during shipment, and is related to the rough handling of individual boxes. The Burst Test mandates a “minimum combined weight of facings”, thereby offering no opportunity to save corrugated paperboard material. Burst Test ratings are not degraded when the combined board is crushed.
In 1991 an alternative Edge Crush Test was approved that is now the dominant test used in the industry. Edge Crush Test is a true performance test directly related to the stacking strength of a box. By providing an alternative to the Burst test mandate for a minimum combined weight of facings, Edge Crush Testing allows the use of lighter weight, less costly board without sacrificing stacking strength. Edge Crush Test ratings, however, are degraded when the combined board is crushed.
Since 1991, corrugated paperboard box manufacturers have manufactured boxes with either a Burst test certification, or an Edge Crush Test certification, depending on the specific shipping requirements.
In a box making plant corrugated paperboard is produced on a corrugator. The board continues through the corrugator and is cut into predetermined sheet sizes, stacked, and delivered in stacks to converting machinery to be converted into boxes.
Existing converting machinery crushes the corrugated paperboard during converting machine operations. The Burst Test ratings of Burst Test certified boxes are not degraded when corrugated paperboard is crushed by existing converting machinery. Edge Crush Test ratings, however, are degraded when the corrugated paperboard is crushed by existing converting machinery.
Because the Burst ratings are not degraded when corrugated paperboard is crushed by converting machinery, and Edge Crush Test ratings are degraded when corrugated paperboard is crushed by converting machinery, two different manufacturing methods are used for Burst Test and Edge Crush Test certified boxes produced on existing converting machinery.
In the manufacturing of Burst certified boxes, sheets from the corrugator are supplied to converting machinery with a Burst rating that is the same as the Burst rating printed on the certificate stamp, because Burst ratings are not degraded when corrugated paperboard is crushed by converting machinery
In the manufacturing of Edge Crush Test certified boxes, however, it is industry wide recommended practice to supply sheets from the corrugator to converting machinery with an Edge Crush Test rating that is from 15% to 20% percent greater than the Edge Crush Test value printed on the certificate stamp, in order to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting machinery degradation, because Edge Crush Test ratings are degraded when corrugated paperboard is crushed by converting machinery.
Increasing the Edge Crush Test rating of sheets from the corrugator from 15% to 20% percent, currently necessary to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting degradation on existing converting machinery, increases fiber use and increases the cost of Edge Crush Test certified boxes. Eliminating Edge Crush Test converting machinery degradation would eliminate the need to increase the Edge Crush Test rating of sheets from the corrugator from 15% to 20% percent, and would benefit the customer, the converter, the corrugated box industry, and the environment.
In a box making plant the sheets produced on the corrugator are delivered in stacks to the converting machinery to be converted into boxes.
In the corrugated paperboard industry it is known to use lead edge sheet feeders at the beginning of converting machinery to feed single sheets from a stack to converting operations. Modern sheet feeders of conventional design, for example, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,811 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,130 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,872 to Sardella, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,244 to Sardella use vacuum assisted feeding elements, such as feed wheels, to transfer the sheet from beneath the stack of sheets to a feed roll nip between a pair of feed rolls for taking over feeding of each sheet from the feed wheels and then feeding the sheet to downstream operations. The feed roll nip is an essential component of these sheet feeders.
The feed rolls are arranged one on top of the other and are spaced slightly apart from each other. The feed rolls must be spaced apart a distance which is smaller than the thickness of the sheet being fed, to press against the sheet and generate enough frictional grip to pull the sheet from beneath the stack and transfer the sheet to downstream converting operations. The small opening between the upper and lower feed rolls through which the sheet must pass is commonly known as the “feed roll nip”.
It is an essential part of conventional sheet feeder operation to make the opening at the feed roll nip small enough to ensure that the sheet is under control for transferring to subsequent machine operations. It is common with conventional feeders to make the feed roll nip between the upper and lower feed rolls so small that the corrugated layer of the sheet is crushed by the feed rolls as it is gripped by them, resulting in Edge Crush Test degradation.
The feed roll nip is recognized in the industry as the major cause of undesirable Edge Crush Test converting degradation.
Retrofitting existing converting machines to eliminate the feed roll nip would eliminate the major source of Edge Crush Test converting degradation, and eliminate the need to supply converting machines with sheets from the corrugator with an Edge Crush Test rating that is from 15% to 20% percent greater than the Edge Crush Test value printed on the certificate stamp, in order to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting degradation. Retrofitting existing converting machines to eliminate the feed roll nip would be a practical and cost effective way to eliminate this wasteful practice.
Eliminating the feed roll nip presents a problem, however, in that the feed roll nip is the nip between the upper and lower feed roll on all existing conventional converting machines, and the lower feed roll is used to drive the main gear train on all existing conventional converting machines. Eliminating the lower feed roll would eliminate the drive for the main gear train of the converting machine.
Eliminating the feed roll nip presents an additional problem, in that the feed roll nip is an essential component of conventional sheet feeders. The feed roll nip is necessary to pull the trailing portion of the sheet from the sheet feeder.
It has been proposed to use lead edge sheet feeders with no feed rolls, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,941,372 to Matsuo, U.S. Pat. No. 4,236,708 to Matsuo, U.S. Pat. No. 5,006,042 to Park, U.S. Pat. No. 5,451,042 to Cuir, U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,760 to Andrien, U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,524 to Levin, U.S. Pat. No. 5,228,674 to Holmes and U.S. Pat. No. 5,048,812 to Holmes to solve the problem of crushing the corrugated paperboard sheets by the feed roll nip. These disclosures, however, fail to address how these lead edge sheet feeders with no feed rolls can be retrofitted into existing converting machines. Converting machines with feed rolls have been manufactured from the early nineteen hundreds until the present time. Replacing the vast number of existing converting machines that have feed rolls with new converting machines that have no feed rolls, to solve the problem of crushing the corrugated paperboard sheets by the feed roll nip, is not a practical solution to the problem, because of the enormous capital cost of new converting machines that would be involved.
Emba Machinery AB, Orebro, Sweden, a manufacturer of converting machinery, offers new converting machines with no feed rolls (model 245 QS Ultima), that include a sheet feeder with no feed roll nip, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,524 to Levin. Emba Machinery has reported that, with this converting machine, there is no longer any need to increase the ECT value of sheets from the corrugator by 15% percent in order to compensate for ECT converting degradation, because the feed roll nip has been eliminated. Emba Machinery does not offer a machine retrofit, however, for the vast number of existing converting machines operating with a feed roll nip. U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,524 to Levin fails to disclose how such lead edge sheet feeders, with no feed rolls, can be retrofitted into existing box converting machines.
Accordingly, there is a need for a practical and cost effective method for retrofitting the vast number of existing box converting machines to eliminate the feed roll nip and thereby end the wasteful practice of increasing the incoming Edge Crush Test rating of sheets from the corrugator by 15% to 20% percent in order to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting degradation, and a non-crush sheet feeder comprising a non-crush constant speed transport section and a variable speed sheet feeder section for use with such retrofitted corrugated paperboard converting machines.
A primary object of the present invention is to provide a simple, practical, and cost effective method and apparatus for retrofitting existing box converting machines to eliminate a feed roll nip and thereby end the wasteful practice of increasing the incoming Edge Crush Test rating of sheets from the corrugator by 15% to 20% percent in order to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting degradation.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a non-crush sheet feeder comprising a non-crush constant speed transport section and a variable speed sheet feeder section for use with such retrofitted corrugated paperboard converting machines.
Described herein is a device and method for retrofitting existing corrugated paperboard converting machines for ending the industry wide wasteful practice of manufacturing corrugated paperboard sheets on the corrugator with Edge Crush Test ratings that are from 15% to 20% percent greater than the Edge Crush Test rating printed in the box-maker's certificate, in order to compensate for the degradation of the Edge Crush Test rating of the box, caused by existing converting machinery.
The device and method disclosed herein eliminates the converting machine feed roll nip that is the cause of increasing the incoming Edge Crush Test rating of sheets from the corrugator by 15% to 20% percent to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting degradation.
The advantages described above are achievable whereby a conventional corrugated paperboard box converting machine comprising feed rolls, a feed roll nip, and a conventional sheet feeder is retrofitted by first removing the conventional sheet feeder, and by removing the feed rolls.
A machine drive shaft, a non-crush sheet feeder comprising a variable speed sheet feeder section, and a non-crush constant speed vacuum transport section, is then inserted into the box converting machine.
The variable speed sheet feeder section may comprise a plurality of variable speed feed wheels which engage the lowermost sheet of a stack of sheets to feed it to the constant speed vacuum transport section. The variable speed feed wheels protrude above the top of a vacuum chamber for holding the sheet against the feed wheels.
The non-crush constant speed vacuum transport section may comprise a plurality of constant speed vacuum transport wheels which engage the sheet to transport it to the box converting machine without crushing. The constant speed transport wheels protrude above the top of a vacuum chamber for holding the sheet against the transport wheels.
Corrugated paperboard box converting machines so retrofitted eliminate the existing feed roll nip for ending the wasteful practice of increasing the incoming Edge Crush Test value of sheets from the corrugator by 15% to 20% percent in order to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting degradation caused by the eliminated feed roll nip.
In the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters in the same or different Figures indicate like parts:
Referring to the drawings in detail, there is illustrated in schematics
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
In the operation of one converting machine 1 operating cycle, with feed interrupt feed interrupter 80 in its lowered feed position, variable speed feed wheels 78 contact sheet 23 and drive sheet 23 to nip 7 between feed rolls 5 and 6, at which point feed roll nip 7 grips sheet 23 to drive sheet 23 and continues to drive sheet 23 at a constant speed until the trailing edge of sheet 23 passes feed roll nip 7.
Prior to the trailing edge of sheet 23 contacting the most upstream feed wheel 78, feed interrupter 80 rises to its raised position to prevent contact between variable speed feed wheels 78 and the next sheet in stack 22.
When feed interrupter 80 is in a raised position, the intense vacuum of vacuum chamber 38 holds the trailing portion of sheet 23 against feed interrupter 80.
In order for nip 7 to grip sheet 23 with sufficient frictional traction to pull the trailing edge of sheet 23 from feed interrupter 80 against the intense vacuum force of vacuum chamber 79, the opening at nip 7 must be made smaller than the thickness of sheet 23. The corrugated medium of sheet 23 is thereby crushed as it passes through nip 7. Crushing the corrugated medium of the sheet 23 results in Edge Crush Test degradation.
The general construction and operation of the feed wheels 78, the raising and lowering of feed interrupter 80, the drive apparatus for feed wheels 78, the application of vacuum, and the timing of these movements is described and illustrated in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,811 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,130 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,872 to Sardella, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,244 to Sardella, which are incorporated by reference.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Drive shaft 9 passes through constant speed transport section 12 and gear case 33. Constant speed transport section 12 is supported by feeder section 2 side frames through support plates 31 and 32. Constant speed transport section drive gear 30 is fixed to drive shaft 9. Transport wheels 24 are fixed to drive shaft 9 and protrude above vacuum chamber 27. An intense vacuum pressure is generated in vacuum chamber 27 by a vacuum blower, not shown, for communicating intense vacuum pressure to the underside of sheet 23, through openings in vacuum chamber cover 28, for generating an intense vacuum on the underside of sheet 23 for holding sheet 23 against constant speed transfer wheels 24 and 25.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
In the operation of one converting machine 1 operating cycle, with feed interrupter 49 in its lowered position, variable speed feed wheels 41, 42, 43, 44 feed sheet 23 past feed gate 8 and to cover constant speed vacuum transport section 12, at which point constant speed transport wheels 24, 25 acquire maximum vacuum traction and drive sheet 23 and continue to drive sheet 23 at constant speed until the trailing edge of sheet 23 pass constant speed transport wheels 25.
Feed wheels 41, 42, 43, 44 stop feeding sheet 23 when the trailing edge of sheet 23 reaches the most upstream feed wheel 44, to prevent feed wheel 41, 42, 43, 44 from contacting the next sheet of stack 22. At this point in the feed cycle, transport of sheet 23 is continued by constant speed vacuum transport wheels 24 and 25.
The intense vacuum on the underside of sheet 23 for holding sheet 23 against constant speed vacuum transfer wheels 24 and 25 provides sufficient frictional traction to pull the trailing portion of sheet 23 from feed interrupter 49 against the intense vacuum force of vacuum chamber 38.
The corrugated medium of sheet 23 is not crushed as it is transported downstream by vacuum transport wheels 24 and 25. Because sheet 23 is not crushed, there is no Edge Crush Test degradation.
Prior art variable speed sheet feeders that were originally designed to feed sheets to a feed roll nip such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,811 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,130 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,872 to Sardella, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,244 to Sardella, with the general construction and operation of feed wheels, raising and lowering of a feed interrupter, a variable speed drive apparatus for driving feed wheels, the application of vacuum, and the timing of these movements could presumably be modified to instead operate with a constant speed vacuum transport section described above. One embodiment of an improved variable speed sheet feeder 13 that is particularly more suited for retrofitting a conventional converting machine is described below.
Referring now to
With continuing reference to
Refer to
Referring to
A plurality of evenly spaced transport wheels 25 are fixed to shaft 26 and protrude through openings in vacuum chamber cover 28. Shaft 26 is supported for rotation in support plates 31 and 32.
Referring to
Transport wheels 24 and 25 have a high friction surface for engaging the underside of sheet 23 for positively driving sheet 23 to printing section 3.
Referring to
With continuing reference to
Referring to
Covers 39, 55 and vacuum chamber 38 define a chamber in which a vacuum is produced through vacuum duct 67 communicating with a vacuum blower, not shown. Cover 55 includes openings surrounding the protruding feed wheels for communicating the vacuum of vacuum chamber 27 to the underside of sheets 23. Vacuum chamber 38 is supported by vertical support plates 31 and 32 which are fixed to crossties, not shown, of feed section 2.
The front, or leading edge of sheet stack 22 is located by a vertical feed gate 8 and supported by support wheel assembly 40. The gap between feed gate 8 and support wheel assembly 40 is adjustable to permit passage of only a single sheet 23.
Referring to
The feed wheels 41, 42, 43, and 44 and shafts 45, 46, 47, and 48 are divided into two sets.
The first set (plurality) comprises shafts 45 with a plurality of feed wheels 41 and shaft 47 with a plurality of feed wheels 43. Feed wheels 41 and 43 are mounted in alignment.
The second set (plurality) comprises shafts 46 with a plurality of feed wheels 42 and shaft 48 with a plurality of feed wheels 44. Feed wheels 42 and 44 are mounted in alignment, but staggered with respect feed wheels 41 and 43, for conserving space in the feed direction.
Referring to
With continuing reference to
Referring to
Rotation of servo motor 70 is controlled by programmable controller 77.
With continuing reference to
Referring to
Feed interrupters 49 straddle each feed wheel 41, 42, 43, and 44 (
An interrupt cover 55 is fixed to brackets 66 of feed interrupters 49, with openings through which feed wheels 41, 42, 43, and 44 protrude. Interrupt cover 55 along with cover 39 form the top of vacuum chamber 38 in which a vacuum is produced through vacuum duct 67 (
With continuing reference to
Referring to
Frame 50 and feed interrupters 49 are supported for vertical movement by four lower guide rollers 51 designated as 51-1, 51-2, 51-3, and 51-4 fixed to the ends of frame 50. Guide rollers 51-1, 51-2, 51-3, and 51-4 are supported on the surface of four cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4 which are fixed to two parallel cam shafts 53-1 and 53-2. Cam shafts 53-1 and 53-2 are supported for rotation in support plates 31 and 32. Rotation of cam shafts 53-1 and 53-2 will result in vertical movement of frame 50 and feed interrupters 49.
Referring to
Rotation of servo motor 69 will thereby rotate cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4 in synchronism. The contour of cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4 is such that a first one-half revolution of the cams will raise frame 50 and feed interrupters 49 from a lowered, feed, position to a raised, stop-feed, position due to the surface contact between guide rollers 51-1, 51-2, 51-3, and 51-4 and cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4.
A second one-half revolution of the cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4 will lower frame 50 and feed interrupters 49 from a raised, stop-feed, position to a lowered, feed, position due to the surface contact between guide rollers 51-1, 51-2, 51-3, 51-4 and cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4.
The magnitude of movement of feed interrupters 49 from the lowered position to the raised position in practice may be approximately 0.125″ for 180 degree rotation of the cams 52-1, 52-2, 52-3, and 52-4, providing a gentile and smooth transition from raised and lowered positions.
When feed interrupters 49 are in the lowered feed position, sheet 23 engages feed wheels 41, 42, 43, and 44 to be positively driven under feed gate 8 and to constant speed transport section 12.
When feed interrupters 49 are in the raised, stop-feed position, feed interrupters 49 contact and support sheet 23 and stack 22 out of engagement with feed wheels 41, 42, 43, and 44 to stop the feeding of sheet 23, and to prevent contact of feed wheels 41, 42, 43, and 44 with the next lowermost sheet in stack 22.
Rotation of servo motor 69 is controlled by programmable controller 77 (
Referring to
Referring to
Conventional corrugated paperboard sheet feeders such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,811 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,130 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,872 to Sardella, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,244 to Sardella operate at one predetermined repeat length. A different model variable speed sheet feeder is required to be retrofitted to box machines with 35, 50, and 66 inch repeat lengths, for instance.
A variable speed sheet feeder of the present invention, in comparison, can be programmed to operate with any machine repeat size, providing economy in manufacturing.
Referring to
With continued reference to
It is known that corrugated paperboard sheet feeders such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,811 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,130 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,872 to Sardella, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,244 to Sardella may provide different modes of operation, such as, feed one sheet per feed cycle (regular feed), feed two sheets per feed cycle (dual feed), feed one sheet for two feed cycles (skip feed), feed one sheet on demand (during set-up), and stop feed on demand (in an emergency). All of these prior art disclosures require additional mechanical components for each additional mode of operation, whereby each additional mode of operation adds manufacturing expenses.
Referring to
Machine operation begins with the operator entering the sheet size and selects feeding one sheet for one box machine cycle (regular feed), for instance, at operator station 82 (
Box machine drive motor, not shown, is activated driving machine drive pulley 14, drive shaft 9, constant speed transfer wheels 24, transport section drive gear 30, and machine drive gear 15. Machine drive gear 15 drives the main gear train of the box machine through a gears mesh, not shown, at a constant speed. (
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The direction of feed is illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Controller 77 may be configured to control feed wheels 41, 42, 43, 44, and feed interrupters 49 to operate in a dual feed mode. No additional mechanical components are required, as on conventional sheet feeders. The machine operator need only select dual feeding at operator input station 82 to access this mode of operation.
Referring to
Skip feed may be used when the length of sheet 23 is greater than the repeat length of the box machine 1. Skip feeding halves the production rate of such sheets relative to feeding one sheet 23 per feed cycle, but enables sheets 23 greater than the repeat length of the box machine to be processed.
Controller 77 may be configured to control feed wheels 41, 42, 43, 44, and feed interrupters 49 to operate in a skip feed mode. No additional mechanical components are required. The machine operator need only select skip feeding at operator input station 82 to access this mode of operation.
Referring to
Controller 77 may be configured to control feed wheels 41, 42, 43, 44, and feed interrupters 49 to feed one sheet per feed cycle, two sheets per feed cycle, one sheet for two feed cycles, emergency stop feed, and to feed individual sheets on demand during set-up, all with no additional mechanical machine elements. The machine operator needs only to select the mode of operation and the size of sheet 23 at operator input station 82.
Although, a specific improved embodiment is shown, the apparatus of corrugated paperboard sheet feeders such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,811 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,130 to Sardella, U.S. Pat. No. 4,896,872 to Sardella, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,828,244 to Sardella, or other similar sheet feeders may be modified and employed to operate in tandem with the machine retrofit described above.
It should be understood that although feed wheels 41, 42, 43, and 44 and transport wheels 24 and 25 have been used in the embodiment shown and described above, endless drive members (not shown) such as belts may be employed as well.
It will therefore be seen that the present invention allows sheets to be fed eliminating feed roll nip crush, thereby eliminating the need to supply sheets from the corrugator to converting machinery with an Edge Crush Test rating that is from 15% to 20% percent greater than the Edge Crush Test value printed on the certificate stamp, in order to compensate for Edge Crush Test converting machinery degradation.
Although specific versions and embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood that the scope of the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments but rather will be indicated in the claims appended.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application No. 62/179,191 filed Apr. 30, 2015 by the present inventor and entitled Corrugated Box Converting Machine Retrofit for Eliminating Edge Crush Test Degradation which is incorporated by reference. The filing date priority of my aforementioned provisional application is hereby claimed for the subject application.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62179191 | Apr 2015 | US |