The present invention relates generally to corrugated pipe having an additional outer layer, and more particularly, to such a corrugated pipe for use in the drainage of soil and transportation of surface water by gravity.
Corrugated pipe has been used in the drainage of water-saturated soil in various agricultural, residential, recreational, or civil engineering and construction applications, such as for storm sewers. Traditionally, drainage pipe was made from clay or concrete, which caused the pipe to be heavy, expensive, and brittle. In order to improve the cost-effectiveness, durability, and ease-of-installation of drainage pipes, it is now common in the art to manufacture them from various materials including various polymers and polymer blends. Such polymer pipes are typically corrugated, having a molded profile with sides of the corrugation that are fairly steep and a top, or crest, of the corrugation that is fairly flat.
There are two basic ways that polymer, corrugated pipe can fail in use: by deforming excessively or by fracturing. Stiffer material is less likely to deform but more likely to fracture under stress. Flexible material is more likely to deform but less likely to fracture under stress. Deformation is expressed as a ratio of elongation of the material to its original material length and is called “strain.” Stress causes the deformation that produces strain. The modulus, or stiffness, of a plastic is the ratio of stress divided by strain, or the amount of stress required to produce a given strain.
There are a number of ways to provide lower deformation of a pipe in use: (1) increasing pipe stiffness by using a stiffer material; (2) thickening the pipe walls; or (3) changing the wall design to increase the moment of inertia, which increases the overall stiffness of the pipe wall. Using stiffer material to make a corrugated plastic pipe is disadvantageous because the pipe must be able to deflect under load to a certain degree without cracking or buckling. A certain amount of elasticity is therefore beneficial in preventing brittle failures upon deflection.
Thickening the pipe walls is also disadvantageous because it adds material cost and increases weight to the pipe, which increases shipping and handling costs. Thus, it is advantageous to find a wall design that increases the moment of inertia of the pipe, while causing a minimal increase to the weight of the pipe or the stiffness of the material used to make the pipe.
Increasing the moment of inertia of a pipe wall increases its resistance to bending. One example of a wall design that increases the moment of inertia, and therefore the stiffness, of a plastic corrugated pipe with minimal increase in pipe weight and material stiffness is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,644,357 to Goddard. In this pipe, the ratio of the height of a corrugation to the width of that corrugation is less than 0.8:1.0, and the sidewall of the corrugation is inclined, with respect to the pipe's inner wall, in the range of 75-80°. This ratio allows the pipe to deflect to greater than 30% of its original diameter without exhibiting imperfections associated with structural failure.
Pipe failure can be prevented by minimizing the maximum force exerted on the pipe walls during the bending associated with deformation. If a sheet of material, such as plastic, is flexed, the outside of the resulting curve is deformed in tension, and the inside of the curve is deformed in compression. Somewhere near the middle of a solid sheet is a neutral plane called the centroid of the sheet. In the case of corrugated pipe, the “sheet” thickness comprises corrugations to achieve economy of material. Because the “sheet” is therefore not solid, the centroid may not be in the middle of the sheet, but rather is located at the center of the radius of gyration of the mass (i.e., the centroid is displaced toward the location of greater mass). The more offset the centroid is from the middle of the sheet thickness, the greater the maximum force will be at the surface farthest from the centroid during bending or flexure from deformation, due to a longer moment arm for certain acting forces. Thus, to lower the maximum force caused by pipe wall deformation, the pipe should be designed so that the centroid is closer to the middle of the sheet thickness. The closer the centroid is to the middle of the sheet thickness, the more desirably uniform the stress distribution will be. Thus, the maximum stress upon deformation will be minimized to prevent pipe failure due to shorter moment arms for acting forces.
In use, it is the deflection and integrity of inner wall 100 that is critical to pipe performance. Deflection of the outer wall 110 is greater than deflection of the inner wall 100 in use, but a certain amount of deflection of the corrugated outer wall 110 is acceptable because, although maintaining the integrity of the outer wall 110 is advantageous, its integrity can be sacrificed to a certain extent without affecting pipe performance, as long as the integrity of the inner wall 100 is maintained. Thus, it is advantageous to provide some flexibility in the outer wall 110 so that it can deflect in use without that deflection translating to the inner wall 100. Although the double wall pipe illustrated in
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide a corrugated polymer pipe having an additional outer layer that increases the moment of inertia so the pipe experiences less deformation in use, and greater resistance to buckling.
The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of features and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
One exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure provides a pipe having an axially extending bore defined by a smooth inner wall fused to a corrugated outer wall. The corrugated outer wall has axially adjacent, annular, outwardly-extending crests separated by valleys. The pipe further includes an outer layer fused to the outer wall, the outer layer having adjacent concave portions and convex portions, the concave portions being aligned with corrugation valleys of the outer wall so that each concave portion of the outer layer extends between at least two corrugation crests.
Another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method of improving the resistance to deformation of a corrugated pipe having a smooth inner wall fused to an outer wall defined by annular crests and valleys. The method includes: fixing an outer layer having adjacent annular concave portions and convex portions to the outer wall with the concave portions being aligned with corrugation valleys of the outer wall so that each concave portion of the outer layer extends between at least two corrugation crests.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of embodiments in addition to those described and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein, as well as the abstract, are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilized as a basis for designing other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, to recognize that the claims should be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention, and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to the exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The corrugated outer wall 220 includes corrugation crests 230 and corrugation valleys 240. On top of the corrugated outer wall 220 is an outer layer 250 of the pipe wall 200 that includes convex portions 260 and concave portions 270. The concave portions 270 of the outer layer 250 are generally aligned with the valleys 240 and extend between adjacent crests 230 of the outer wall 220.
For the purposes of example and illustration, the present disclosure will be discussed with respect to two exemplary dimensional scenarios of the illustrated embodiment. For an exemplary embodiment of eighteen inch diameter corrugated pipe, an inner wall 210 may have a thickness of approximately 0.052 inches and an outer wall 220 may have a material thickness of approximately 0.08 inches to approximately 0.09 inches. In some cases, the thickness of the walls may not be completely uniform. The thickness of the outer layer 250 may be approximately 0.052 inches. The axial distance between the midpoint of adjacent corrugation valleys 240 may be approximately 2.617 inches. The radial distance between the top of the thickness that forms the corrugation valley 240 and the top of the thickness that forms the corrugation crest 230 may be approximately 1.3566 inches. The radial distance between the peak of a convex portion 260 of the outer layer 250 and the valley of a concave portion 270 of the outer layer 250 (“outer layer corrugation height” or “wave height”) may be approximately 0.25 inches. In some cases, the thickness of the outer layer 250 may not be completely uniform.
For an exemplary embodiment of forty-two inch diameter corrugated pipe, an inner wall 210 may have a thickness of approximately 0.111 inches and an outer wall 220 may have a material thickness of approximately 0.15 inches to approximately 0.16 Inches. In some cases, the thickness of the walls may not be completely uniform. The thickness of the outer layer 250 may be approximately 0.1123 inches. The axial distance between the midpoint of adjacent corrugation valleys 240 may be approximately 5.1383 inches. The radial distance between the top of the thickness that forms the corrugation valley 240 and the top of the thickness that forms the corrugation crest 230 may be approximately 2.9025 inches. The radial distance between the peak of a convex portion 260 of the outer layer 250 and the valley of a concave portion 270 of the outer layer 250 (“Outer Layer Corrugation Height”) may be approximately 0.25 inches. In some cases, the thickness of the outer layer 250 may not be completely uniform.
The following chart provides some exemplary dimensions of a greater variety of pipe sizes:
It is to be understood that these pipe dimensions are merely exemplary, and that the present invention contemplates various pipes having a wide variety of dimensions. However, detailed experimental examples will be discussed below with respect to an exemplary embodiment of forty-eight inch corrugated pipe having an outer layer.
Specifically, two studies were performed on ADS standard N-12 design 48-inch, three-wall corrugated pipe. The studies examined the influence of the thickness of the outer layer 250, the outer layer corrugation height, and the thickness of the outer wall 220, on overall pipe stiffness and buckling.
The first study examined the effect of changing the thickness of the outer layer 250 (i.e., 0.12″, 0.16″, 0.20″, 0.24″, and 0.28″) for four different outer layer corrugation heights (i.e., 0″, 0.125″, 0.25″, and 0.375″), given a fixed thickness for each of the inner wall 210 and the outer wall 220. The twenty different cases are represented in the table below:
The addition of the various thicknesses of outer layer 250 resulted in a percent increase in pipe profile area, compared to a standard N-12 profile, as shown in
Finite element analyses were conducted for the twenty cases to determine the percent increase in pipe stiffness for each thickness of added outer layer 250, compared to a standard N-12, 48-inch pipe, as shown in
The results confirmed that, for most thicknesses of the added outer layer 250, an increase in wave height may reduce the benefit of the added pipe stiffness.
Linear buckling analyses were also conducted on the profiles to determine the load per unit length sustainable by each of the inner wall 210 and outer layer 250, as compared to the load per unit length required to produce a 5% deflection in the pipe.
The results indicate that increasing the thickness of the outer layer 250 may substantially increase both the load at 5% deflection and the buckling load of the inner wall 210. However, a thickness of the outer layer 250 of less than 0.15″ may result in a buckling load for the inner wall 210, which is less than that required for a 5% deflection of the pipe.
The second study examined the effect of changing the thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 (i.e., 0.18″, 0.20″, 0.22″, 0.237″, and 0.260″) for the four different outer layer corrugation heights (i.e., 0″, 0.125″, 0.25″, and 0.375″), given a thickness of the inner wall 210 of approximately 0.116″ and a thickness of the outer layer 250 of approximately 0.16″. The twenty different cases are represented in the table below:
The addition of the 0.16″ outer layer 250 and changes to the thickness of the outer wall 220 resulted in a percent increase in pipe profile area, compared to a standard N-12 profile, as shown in
Finite element analyses were conducted for the twenty cases to determine the percent increase in pipe stiffness for each thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 including the additional 0.16″ outer layer 250, compared to a standard N-12, 48-inch pipe, as shown in
The results indicate that increasing the thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 increases the overall pipe stiffness. It was determined that reducing the thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 from the standard N-12 thickness of 0.237″ to 0.220″ would reduce the pipe profile area by approximately 6.0% and reduce the pipe stiffness by approximately 6.3%. Moreover, only an outer layer 250 corrugation height (“wave height”) approaching 0.375″ would cause any substantial reduction in pipe stiffness.
Linear buckling analyses were conducted on the twenty profiles to determine the load per unit length sustainable by the inner wall 210 for each thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 at a given outer layer 250 corrugation height (“wave height”), as shown in
It was determined that reducing the thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 from the standard N-12 thickness of 0.237″ to 0.220″ would reduce the buckling load of the inner wall 210 by about 4.5%.
Linear buckling analyses were also conducted on the twenty profiles to determine the load per unit length sustainable by the outer layer 250 for each thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 at a given outer layer 250 corrugation height (“wave height”), as shown in
It was determined that reducing the thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 from the standard N-12 thickness of 0.237″ to 0.220″ would reduce the buckling load of the outer layer 250 by about 3.5%.
The buckling load of the corrugated, outer wall 220 of the three-wall pipe was also compared to the buckling load for corrugated wall of the standard N-12 profile, as depicted as a negative percent change in
The results indicate that, over the profile dimensions considered, adding the outer layer 250 decreases the load at which buckling occurs in the corrugated wall. It was determined that reducing the thickness of the corrugated outer wall 220 from the standard N-12 thickness of 0.237″ to 0.220″ would reduce the buckling load of the outer wall 220 by about 4.5%.
Based on the results of these and other studies, it was determined that in an exemplary embodiment of the three-wall corrugated pipe, it would be advantageous to have the outer layer 250 and the inner wall 210 buckling at loads greater than the loads required for 5% pipe deflection. Accordingly, the outer layer 250 may have a thickness of approximately 0.15″ or greater. For example, a thickness of 0.20″ for the outer layer 250 may result in a 40% increase in stiffness. The inner wall 210 may have a thickness of approximately 0.15″ or greater, considering that an increase in thickness from 0.116″ to 0.15″ results in an additional 40 lb/in in buckling load per unit length.
Moreover, the studies indicated that in an exemplary embodiment of the three-wall corrugated pipe, it would be advantageous to have an outer layer 250 corrugation height (“wave height”) between approximately 0.15 and 0.25 inches. Specifically, it was found that an increase in outer layer corrugation height from 0.0 to 0.25 inches provided a 40% increase in buckling load for the outer layer 250, while producing only a modest 3% decrease in stiffness.
Accordingly, it was determined that the thicknesses of the outer wall 220 and the outer layer 250 could be adjusted in order to keep the overall pipe profile area relatively low, while providing increased stiffness and tolerable buckling loads. In particular, the corrugated pipe disclosed herein achieves reduced failure and installation sensitivity due to an increased moment of inertia (i.e., stiffness) of the pipe wall, which translates into increased resistance to deformation bending.
The outer layer 250 may decrease the amount of pipe wall deformation and improve pipe performance by increasing the pipe stiffness without thickening the pipe walls or using a stiffer material for the pipe walls. One way the outer layer 250 may accomplish this is by moving the centroid (or radius of gyration) of the pipe wall 200 closer to the midpoint of the wall thickness.
In one embodiment, the thicknesses of each of the outer layer 250 and the inner wall 210 may be adjusted by a similar amount in order to maintain the location of the centroid 320 relative to the midpoint of the three wall pipe thickness. For example, given a need to increase the thickness of the outer layer 250, the thickness of the inner wall 210 may be increased by the same amount to prevent the centroid of the three wall pipe from moving. The thickness of the outer wall 220 may also be adjusted in a manner that maintains the desired location of the centroid. By preventing the centroid from moving, the optimal stiffness of the three-wall pipe can be maintained.
Moreover, just as the corrugations of known corrugated pipe may comprise a sacrificial layer capable of deflecting to a certain extent in order to accommodate forces exhibited on the pipe in use, the outer layer 250 of the present invention may provide yet another sacrificial layer. Thus, in an exemplary embodiment, there may be two layers capable of deflecting to accommodate forces exhibited on the pipe in use to prevent those forces from deforming the inner wall of the pipe.
The shape of the outer layer 250 may also advantageously increase the soil bearing area of the pipe exterior, because the load on the pipe created by backfill is spread out over a greater exterior area of the pipe, thus reducing the load per square inch on the pipe exterior thereby reducing the maximum forces on the pipe from the backfill load.
A further advantage of the presently disclosed three wall pipe is that the outer layer can be applied to or extruded with existing double wall corrugated pipe eliminating any need to redesign existing double wall corrugated pipe. The outer layer 250 may be fused to the corrugated outer wall 220 where the convex portions 260 of the outer layer 250 meet the crests 230 of the corrugated outer wall 220. The inner and outer walls 210, 220 may also be fused together by extruding the outer wall 220 onto the inner wall 210 while the inner wall 210 is still hot. Likewise, the outer layer 250 may be fused to the outer wall 220 by extruding the outer layer 250 onto the outer wall 220 while the outer wall 220 is still hot.
In a preferred embodiment, the manufacture of the three wall pipe includes extruding the outer layer 250 out of a cross-head die and onto the outside of the outer wall 220 while the outer layer 250 is still hot. The three wall pipe may then be conveyed through a spray tank to water-cool the three wall pipe without being first conveyed through a vacuum sizing tank. Accordingly, the naturally occurring concave portions 270 of the outer layer 250 are allowed to form between crests 230 of the corrugated outer wall 220, without the time and energy consuming process of vacuum sizing.
The layers of pipe may alternatively be co-extruded or adhered to each other with a suitable adhesive after extrusion. The present disclosure also contemplates a variety of methods for creating a pipe with an outer layer 250, for example by strapping the outer layer 250 to the outer wall 220 of the corrugated pipe.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the inner wall 210, outer wall 220, and outer layer 250 of the pipe comprise a plastic such as high density polyethylene (HDPE) or polypropylene (PP). The pipe may alternatively comprise a variety of other materials including, for example, other plastics, metals, or composite materials. For example, the inner wall 210, outer wall 220, and outer layer 250 of the pipe could be comprised of different, but compatible, materials.
Referring now to
Accordingly, the exemplary three-wall pipe having the inner wall 210, the corrugated outer wall 220 (having crests 230 and valleys 240), and the outer layer 250 (having convex portions 260 and concave portions 270), may be cut into discrete sections and coupled together by the bell and spigot portions 412, 414.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the gasket of the present invention and in construction of this gasket without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/078,323, which was filed on Mar. 14, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,484,535 and which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2700631 | Sussenbach et al. | Jan 1955 | A |
2753596 | Bailey | Jul 1956 | A |
2877150 | Wilson | Mar 1959 | A |
2888954 | Gates | Jun 1959 | A |
2931069 | McCormick | Apr 1960 | A |
3081102 | Murray et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3379805 | Roberts | Apr 1968 | A |
3490496 | Steams | Jan 1970 | A |
3538209 | Hegler | Nov 1970 | A |
3573871 | Warner | Apr 1971 | A |
3605232 | Hines | Sep 1971 | A |
3649730 | Lachenmayer et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3677676 | Hegler | Jul 1972 | A |
3725565 | Schmidt | Apr 1973 | A |
3802908 | Emmons | Apr 1974 | A |
3819292 | Wentworth | Jun 1974 | A |
3824886 | Hegler | Jul 1974 | A |
3837364 | Jenner | Sep 1974 | A |
3869235 | Moore | Mar 1975 | A |
3944641 | Lemelson | Mar 1976 | A |
3957386 | Lupke | May 1976 | A |
4042661 | Cook | Aug 1977 | A |
4113411 | Terragni | Sep 1978 | A |
4165214 | Lupke et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4180357 | Lupke | Dec 1979 | A |
4218164 | Lupke | Aug 1980 | A |
4219293 | Licht | Aug 1980 | A |
4220181 | Nyssen | Sep 1980 | A |
4223895 | Roberts, Jr. et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4230157 | Larsen et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4262162 | Plinke et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4281981 | Feldman | Aug 1981 | A |
4303104 | Hegler et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4319476 | Fuchs, Jr. | Mar 1982 | A |
4352701 | Shimba et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4377545 | Hornbeck | Mar 1983 | A |
4397797 | Nojiri et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4402658 | Larsen | Sep 1983 | A |
4415389 | Medford et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4436679 | Winstead | Mar 1984 | A |
4439130 | Dickhut et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4492551 | Hegler et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4523613 | Fouss et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4528832 | Fuchs, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4534923 | Lupke | Aug 1985 | A |
4547246 | Viriyayuthakorn et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4562990 | Rose | Jan 1986 | A |
4572523 | Guettouche et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4588546 | Feil et al. | May 1986 | A |
4666649 | Takubo et al. | May 1987 | A |
4678526 | Hawerkamp | Jul 1987 | A |
4683166 | Yuto et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4703639 | Fuchs, Jr. | Nov 1987 | A |
4756339 | Buluschek | Jul 1988 | A |
4779651 | Hegler et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4789327 | Chan et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4808098 | Chan et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4846660 | Drossbach | Jul 1989 | A |
4849113 | Hills | Jul 1989 | A |
4852616 | Holcomb | Aug 1989 | A |
4854416 | Lalikos et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862728 | Hardouin | Sep 1989 | A |
4862924 | Kanao | Sep 1989 | A |
4900503 | Hegler et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4906496 | Hosono et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4970351 | Kirlin | Nov 1990 | A |
5045254 | Peelman et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058934 | Brannon | Oct 1991 | A |
5071173 | Hegler et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5089074 | Winter et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5124109 | Drossbach | Jun 1992 | A |
5129428 | Winter et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129429 | Winter et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5129685 | Engel | Jul 1992 | A |
5145545 | Winter et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156901 | Tanaka | Oct 1992 | A |
5192834 | Yamanishi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5222288 | Thomas | Jun 1993 | A |
5228479 | Thomas | Jul 1993 | A |
5256233 | Winter et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5262109 | Cook | Nov 1993 | A |
5275544 | Marlowe | Jan 1994 | A |
5279332 | Winter et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5314553 | Hashimoto et al. | May 1994 | A |
5330600 | Lupke | Jul 1994 | A |
5335945 | Meyers | Aug 1994 | A |
5346384 | Hegler et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5372774 | Lupke | Dec 1994 | A |
5383497 | Winter et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383998 | Lupke | Jan 1995 | A |
5391334 | Enomoto | Feb 1995 | A |
5394904 | Winter et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5441083 | Korsgaard | Aug 1995 | A |
5456291 | Kunzmann | Oct 1995 | A |
5460771 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462090 | Winter et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466402 | Lupke | Nov 1995 | A |
5469892 | Noone et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472659 | Hegler et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5472746 | Miyajima et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5522718 | Dietrich | Jun 1996 | A |
5531952 | Hatfield | Jul 1996 | A |
5545369 | Lupke | Aug 1996 | A |
5572917 | Truemner et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5608637 | Wang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5620722 | Spina | Apr 1997 | A |
5640951 | Huddart et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649713 | Ledgerwood | Jul 1997 | A |
5706864 | Pfleger | Jan 1998 | A |
5715870 | Winter et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5759461 | Jarvenkyla et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773044 | Dietrich et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778940 | Tucker et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5848618 | Guest | Dec 1998 | A |
5894865 | Winter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901754 | Elsässer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5904643 | Seeberger et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909908 | Furuse | Jun 1999 | A |
5912023 | Katoh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5975143 | Järvenkylä et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976298 | Hegler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000434 | Winter et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016848 | Egres, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6039082 | Winter et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6062268 | Elsasser et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082741 | Gregoire et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6161591 | Winter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6186182 | Yoon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199592 | Siferd et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6240969 | Wildermuth | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6335101 | Haeger et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6399002 | Lupke et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405974 | Herrington | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6461078 | Presby | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491994 | Kito et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6524519 | Ohba et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6555243 | Flepp et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6591871 | Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607010 | Kashy | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631741 | Katayama et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645410 | Thompson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682677 | Lobovsky et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6696011 | Yun et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6719302 | Andrick | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6787092 | Chan et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6848464 | Ransom | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6848478 | Nagai | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6854168 | Booms et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6933028 | Milhas | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935378 | Ikemoto et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6955780 | Herrington | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983769 | Arima et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7074027 | Starita | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7114944 | Wolfe et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118369 | Dietrich et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122074 | Kim | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140859 | Herrington | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156128 | Kanao | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7185894 | Kish et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7347225 | Nobileau | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20020179232 | Thompson | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040146696 | Jones | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040187946 | Herrington | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040241368 | Iwata et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060293159 | Neubauer | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070204929 | Jarvenkyla | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080118596 | Hetzner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090127852 | Sutton et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 278 734 | Sep 1968 | DE |
2 042 031 | Aug 1970 | DE |
1 704 718 | Jul 1971 | DE |
2 042 031 | May 1972 | DE |
2 413 878 | Feb 1976 | DE |
2 403 618 | Dec 1980 | DE |
2 804 540 | Jan 1984 | DE |
297 06 045 | Jun 1997 | DE |
0 041 252 | Dec 1981 | EP |
0 096 957 | May 1989 | EP |
0 385 465 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 385 465 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 494 566 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 581 064 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 726 134 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 543 243 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0 600 214 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 890 770 | May 1998 | EP |
0 890 770 | May 1998 | EP |
1 293 718 | Mar 2003 | EP |
0 600 214 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1 486 473 | Jun 1967 | FR |
1148277 | Apr 1967 | GB |
1 148 277 | Apr 1969 | GB |
2 300 684 | Nov 1996 | GB |
56144943 | Nov 1981 | JP |
57160518 | Oct 1982 | JP |
57-193479 | Dec 1982 | JP |
58168422 | Oct 1983 | JP |
59 026224 | Feb 1984 | JP |
59114027 | Jun 1984 | JP |
61135416 | Jun 1986 | JP |
H02-85087 | Jul 1990 | JP |
06 64062 | Mar 1994 | JP |
08-258175 | Oct 1996 | JP |
08-258176 | Oct 1996 | JP |
08 267128 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2003062891 | Mar 2003 | JP |
WO 8500140 | Jan 1985 | WO |
WO 9812046 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 2004094888 | Nov 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-final Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/078,323. |
Final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/078,323. |
Non-final Office Action dated May 29, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/078,323. |
Modern Plastics Worldwide, Apr. 2008 edition, p. 35, “Device offers alternative for constant flow filtration.”. |
Foerst, Dr. Wilhelm, Ullmanns Encyklopädie der technischen Chemia, Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munchen, Berline, Germany, pp. 52-53, 71-73, 1960. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/078,323, filed Mar. 14, 2005, Entitled Corrugated Pipe with Outer Layer. |
Extended EP Search Report for European Patent Application No. 06737855.4-1252 dated Nov. 17, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080210327 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11078323 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12019738 | US |