The present invention relates to molded non-metal chambers for subsurface receipt and dispersal of waters, in particular to molded plastic chambers for receiving stormwater.
In use, a storm water chamber is buried beneath the surface of the earth, to collect storm water, such as runoff from parking lots and the like. In a typical stormwater chamber installation, a multiplicity of chambers is laid into cavities in the earth as large array, and then covered over with gravel, stone or soil. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,156,488, 5,511,903 and 5,890,838 for examples of chambers. Often the chambers are placed on and buried in gravel; and overlaid with more gravel or soil or a paved surface for motor vehicle traffic or parking. Thus, it is important that they be structurally sound.
An object of the invention is to provide stormwater chambers and related components which are strong, economic to produce, which nest well for shipping, which connect together well, and which are adapted for receiving internal flow control baffles.
In accord with the invention, an arch shape cross section chamber for receiving and dispersing stormwater when buried beneath the surface of the earth is corrugated and has a cross section geometry which is a continuous curve. Preferably, the curve is a truncated semi-ellipse, that is, less than half an ellipse, wherein the major axis of the ellipse lies along the vertical axis of the chamber. Thus, the vertical height of the chamber interior is less than half of the length of the major axis of the semi-ellipse of which the chamber geometry is a portion.
In accord with the invention, a storm water chamber comprises a combination of standard corrugations along most of the length, in combination with smaller end corrugations, to enable joining of chambers in overlap fashion, as a string; corrugations which have elliptically curved corrugation widths when viewed from the side of the chamber; and, sidewall base flanges which have turned up outer edges in combination with fins which connect said edges with the curved chamber sidewall.
In further accord with the invention, a domed end cap fits onto the end of the chamber to prevent gravel and soil form entering. A hole may be cut in the cap, so an input pipe can deliver water to the chamber. The cap and chamber are also shaped so the outer edge of the cap fits within the corrugations in the central part of the chamber, which corrugations are larger than those at one end. When so positioned, and when the dome has a cut out at an elevation substantially above the elevation of the base, water flow from one part of the chamber, or from one part of a series of interconnected chambers to another part, is inhibited.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments and accompanying drawings.
An arch shape cross section chamber of the present invention is described in pending U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/849,768 of Krueger et al., filed May 24, 2001. The disclosure and drawings thereof are hereby incorporated by reference. The present invention is also described in two provisional patent applications, namely Ser. No. 60/202,255, filed May 5, 2000, and Ser. No. 60/368,764 filed Mar. 29, 2003, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In the incorporated references, the invention is variously referred to as a storm management system and, in part, as a corrugated stormwater chamber. A typical chamber may be 45–50 inch wide at the base by 30 inch high at the peak interior and 91 inch long. It is preferably made of injection molded high density polypropylene, or polyethylene or comparable material.
Preferably it is made by injection molding, for precision, although other known methods of fabrication may alternatively be used.
The bulk of the body of the chamber has corrugations of a standard dimension, including first end corrugation 28, except for at least a smaller second end corrugation 26. See
Thus, as shown in the partial vertical center-plane cross section of
The opposing side flanges 36 have turned up outer edges 102, called support members, for providing strength in the longitudinal direction. See
An end plate 22, called an end dome here, is shown in
The end dome 20 can also fit within any of the other corrugations of the chamber 20, along the chamber length. Thus, if the chamber 20 is cut at any point along its length, to form a shortened length chamber, the end dome can be used as a closure at the cut end. The dome 22 has scoring which enable circular cutouts 24, to enable a pipe to deliver water to the interior of chamber(s).
When soil pushes on the dome end plate 22, there is a lateral outward force, as the dome tries to flatten. So, the loose fit referred to above is not so loose as to prevent the dome flange or periphery from engaging the inside of a chamber corrugation and pushing outwardly on it. Since the chamber is backed by soil or stone lying along the length of the chamber, the chamber in vicinity of said corrugation resists the outward force. Thus, the dome endplate in the invention provides substantially greater strength and stiffness than does a flat end plate.
An extra dome 22 with a through hole can be positioned at any point along the length of the chamber, to provide a baffle or act as a weir. In such use the dome may have a cutout at an elevation. Because of the kind of fit mentioned above, there can be flow through the gap between the end dome and chamber corrugation, so the end dome acts as a weir. If it is desired to prevent such, appropriate sealant or gasketing can be employed. Using a dome-as-weir creates subchambers within the length of a chamber. More than one dome may be positioned along the length of a chamber to create a multiplicity of subchambers. The dome-as-weir is used to make the subchamber function as a reservoir and settlement basin. Thus, water flowing along the length of the chamber will stagnate in velocity and desirable settling of entrained debris will be realized. Thus, by strategic placement of dome-weirs along the length of the chamber near the inlet end of a string of chambers, a preferential region for settlement of heavier than water debris is created. Cleaning is made easier. While the dome shaped end plate is preferred when a weir is desired, in the generality of this aspect of the invention, flat end plates may be used as weirs.
The chamber has another feature which is characterized by an approximate or exact elliptical curve. This is appreciated when the chamber length is viewed from the side in elevation, as in
In another aspect of the invention, the chamber has vertical standoffs in the form of fins 44, also called connecting elements, which are spaced apart along the opposing side base flanges 36. Fins 44 connect outer edges 102 with the nearby curved chamber sidewall, to provide support to the flanges in the direction normal to the length of the chamber. See
The inventions may be applied to chambers that have configurations other than the exemplary chambers; and, they may be applied to chambers used for other purposes than receiving and dispersing stormwater. For instance, the inventions may be applied to wastewater leaching chambers and to other arch like devices adapted for dispersing or gathering waters into or from soil and granular media.
Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in this art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.
This application is a continuation in part of patent application U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/849,768 of Krueger et al., filed May 4, 2001. This application claims benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/202,255, filed May 5, 2000 and of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/368,764 filed Mar. 29, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
460352 | Reading | Sep 1891 | A |
680548 | Sikes | Aug 1901 | A |
980442 | Schlafly | Jan 1911 | A |
1541918 | Brennan | Jun 1925 | A |
1989950 | Snyder | Feb 1935 | A |
2866319 | Nicholson | Dec 1958 | A |
3495410 | Bailey et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3570251 | Roberts | Mar 1971 | A |
4245924 | Fouss et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4598277 | Feldman | Jul 1986 | A |
4605338 | Peterson | Aug 1986 | A |
4759661 | Nichols et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4838317 | Andre et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5156488 | Nichols | Oct 1992 | A |
5441363 | Gray | Aug 1995 | A |
5833394 | McCavour | Nov 1998 | A |
5839844 | Nichols et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6050746 | McCavour et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6076993 | Gray | Jun 2000 | A |
6129482 | Ditullio | Oct 2000 | A |
6203245 | Harten | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6270287 | Gray | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6361248 | Maestro | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6595722 | McCavour | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6612777 | Maestro | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6698975 | Benecke | Mar 2004 | B1 |
20020067952 | Cregcenzi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60368764 | Mar 2002 | US | |
60202255 | May 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09849768 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10402414 | US |