The invention pertains to cosmetic applicator systems. Specifically, the invention pertains to immersion-type cosmetic applicator systems.
By a “wand-type” applicator we mean an extended rod or stem having a proximal end with a handle and a distal free end that is adapted to aid in the delivery of product to a product application surface. The extended rod allows the free end to reach to the bottom of a product reservoir. The extended rod also facilitates application of the product and grooming, by providing clearance between the applicator head and the handle of the applicator. This clearance is especially necessary for mascara application to the eyelashes. This definition might include a cotton swab, but not a cotton ball, because a cotton ball does not have an extended rod or stem with a proximal and a distal end.
By an “immersion-type” applicator we mean a wand-type applicator having a distal end that is adapted to be immersed in a reservoir of product, to remove product from the reservoir. Conventional mascara applicators fit this description. Examples of applicators that do not fit this description include those in which product is made to flow from an integrated reservoir, through an applicator head and onto the applicator surface.
Immersion-type cosmetic applicator systems that have two wand-type applicators are known. For example, there are applicator systems having two product reservoirs, one for each applicator, wherein the reservoirs are joined together, often end to end or side by side. U.S. Pat. No. 4,886,080 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,691,184 describe systems where the applicator heads point toward each other. U.S. Pat. No. 3,690,777, U.S. Pat. No. 6,612,764, U.S. Pat. No. 6,682,242, US200210018688, DE3923731 and CA1,158,602 describe systems in which the applicator heads point away from each other. Systems with applicator heads pointing in the same direction are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,509,742 and US-D287,168.
There are also applicator systems having two wand-type applicators, but only one product reservoir, and only one entry into the reservoir. U.S. Pat. No. 2,829,655, U.S. Pat. No. 5,970,990, U.S. Pat. No. 2,902,041 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,073,320 describe systems wherein one of the wand-type applicators is not intended to be immersed in the product reservoir. Often this applicator is actually a grooming tool, such as a comb or other accessory tool. Both wand-type applicators may be attached to the same closure that seals off the reservoir, and a removable cap is provided for the applicator that does not go into the reservoir.
There are also applicator systems having two wand-type applicators, but neither applicator is ever immersed in a product reservoir. Either product is made to flow from a reservoir, through an applicator head and onto the applicator surface (for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,592,202, US-D286,163, US-D295,878, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,688,450) or there is no product in the applicator system (i.e. U.S. Pat. No. 5,056,179).
In all of the applicator systems described in the foregoing references, all of the applicator heads are functional. In almost all of them, the applicator heads are different from each other. In US-D295,878, the applicator heads appear to be identical, but apparently dispense different products (i.e. differently colored inks).
Sometimes a cosmetics seller wants to show potential customers the type of applicator that comes with a product. However, the applicator head is not visible when it is immersed in a product reservoir, as it is when the product reservoir is sealed for distribution in a commercial environment. One way around this problem is by sealing the product reservoir with temporary closure or seal, and then packaging the reservoir and the applicator side-by-side, in a transparent outer packaging. The problem here is that a relatively small and sleek design, such as a mascara tube, is replaced by a bulky plastic over shell. The plastic overshell significantly increases the cost of goods. Also, once the applicator head is immersed in the product, the applicator head is again not visible. A woman who owns several mascara products, for example, may not remember which applicator is in each product.
A main object of the invention is to provide a cosmetic applicator system with two identical or substantially identical applicators, one functional, but not always visible, and one non-functional, but always visible.
Another object of the invention is to provide a cosmetic applicator system that can be distributed and sold in a fully assembled condition, while still allowing a consumer to see the type of applicator head that she is purchasing.
Like some of the applicator systems of the prior art, the applicator system of the present invention has one reservoir that holds a product, or that is able to hold a product; one wand-type applicator having a distal free end that must be immersed in the product reservoir in order to remove product from the reservoir; and one wand-type applicator that is intended not to be immersed in the product reservoir. Like some of the prior art, both applicators are attached to the same closure, and a cap for the applicator that is not intended to be immersed in the product reservoir is supplied. Unlike the prior art, however, the present applicator system has two identical or substantially identical applicators. In preferred embodiments, a cap is provided for the applicator that is not intended to be immersed in the product reservoir. More preferably, this cap is permanently affixed, thus rendering that applicator non-functional. Preferably, at least a portion of the non-removable cap is transparent, so that the non-functional applicator can be seen by the unaided human eye.
Throughout the figures, repeated reference numbers denote the same feature in assorted embodiments of the invention.
Referring to the embodiment of
As is usually done in the art, the opened end (2a) of the reservoir (2) may be fitted with a wiper element (5) which function is to remove excess product from the bristles (4a) of the first applicator head (4).
Protruding from an exterior surface (3e) of the closure (3), is a second applicator head (6). Generally, the second applicator head is co-axial with, but pointing away from the first applicator head (4). The second applicator head may be attached to the closure through a short stem (3f) that arises from the exterior surface (3e) of the closure. Preferably, the short stem is short enough to render the second applicator head non-functional. For example, the short extension of the second applicator head means that even if the second applicator head were inserted into the opened end (2a) of the reservoir (2), the second applicator head is unable to reach the product in the reservoir. Also, the relatively short extension of the second applicator head beyond the closure (3) inhibits the second applicator head from being used to groom the eyelashes, because the closure (3) gets in the way. Thus, a critical feature of the invention is that the second applicator head (6) be non-functional as a product applicator. Nevertheless, the second applicator head does have a purpose. When the closure (3) is engaged with the neck (2b) of the reservoir, then the first applicator head is not visible, being immersed in the reservoir, but the second applicator head remains visible at all times.
The second applicator head (6) may be protected by a cap that surrounds the second applicator head. Preferably, this is the case. Furthermore, because the second applicator head is non-functional, it may be preferable if the protective cap cannot be removed by ordinary means. For example, a non-removable cap (7) may be provided that rigidly connects to the closure (3) by any suitable, permanent means, such as with adhesive, welding, snap fitments, crimping, etc. In order the for the second applicator head to remain visible, at least a portion of the non-removable cap (7) should be transparent. The transparent portion may be a cut-out (see
In preferred applicator systems of the present invention, the second applicator head (6) is identical or substantially identical to the first applicator head (4). By “substantially identical”, we mean that as viewed under the non-removable cap (7), a user can not tell the difference between the first and second applicator heads. For example, the second applicator head may differ from the first applicator head in some internal structure, dimension or material that is not visible to a user, while on the outside the two applicator heads are generally indistinguishable.
One benefit of the present invention is that in the closed (or fully assembled) configuration, as shown in
Another benefit is that throughout the life of the applicator system, the applicator head is visible so that a woman who owns several similar products will always be able to identify an applicator head according to the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2065800 | Freeman | Dec 1936 | A |
2458063 | Dulberg | Jan 1949 | A |
2571620 | Sala | Oct 1951 | A |
2691184 | Miller et al. | Oct 1954 | A |
2829655 | Bau | Apr 1958 | A |
2902041 | Bau | Sep 1959 | A |
3071143 | Bau | Jan 1963 | A |
3073320 | Seaver | Jan 1963 | A |
3592202 | Jones | Jul 1971 | A |
3688450 | Brockman | Sep 1972 | A |
3690777 | Costa | Sep 1972 | A |
D286163 | Shintani | Oct 1986 | S |
D287168 | Kingsford et al. | Dec 1986 | S |
D295878 | Lovell | May 1988 | S |
4886080 | Cole | Dec 1989 | A |
5056179 | Capponi | Oct 1991 | A |
5509742 | Balzarini | Apr 1996 | A |
5655554 | Goldberg | Aug 1997 | A |
5970990 | Dunton et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6612764 | Dumer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6682242 | Montoli | Jan 2004 | B1 |
7374356 | Oike | May 2008 | B2 |
20020018688 | Dumler et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1158602 | Dec 1983 | CA |
3923731 | Jan 1991 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150257512 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |