The present invention relates to a cosmetic applicator.
A known conventional container for a liquid, paste-form, or gel-form cosmetic such as lipstick, lip gloss, eye shadow, or concealer is constituted by a storage portion filled with the cosmetic and a cap to which an application tool is attached. This type of container is used by extracting the cosmetic from the storage portion with the application tool and applying the cosmetic to the lips or the like, and is employed widely due to its superior portability and usability.
A cosmetic application method for applying shine to the lips has been particularly favored in recent years, and therefore, to ensure that a sufficient amount of cosmetic can be applied in a single application, an application tool in which an applicator is formed in a wide, flat spatula shape that projects from a shaft and a surface of the applicator is subjected to electrostatic flocking (flocking processing) so that the cosmetic can be scooped up easily and the applicator can easily be impregnated with the cosmetic is employed.
When more than a required amount of the cosmetic is adhered to the applicator, however, problems such as straying of the cosmetic onto unintended parts occur during a cosmetic application operation for applying the cosmetic to the lips. Therefore, a wiping part for wiping the applicator to scrape off the excess cosmetic is disposed on an extraction port of the container.
In an application tool having a flat applicator subjected to electrostatic flocking, however, frictional force between the part projecting from the shaft and the wiping part is great, and therefore the flock may peel.
When the cosmetic application tool is withdrawn from the storage portion, the frictional force with the wiping part is greatest in a part of the applicator corresponding to a so-called shoulder of an application portion, which extends from a joint portion joined to the shaft to a projecting portion. As a result, damage such as peeling of the flock increases, causing impairment of the function of the application tool (
Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2006-346469
An object of the present invention is to provide a cosmetic applicator obtained by implementing electrostatic flocking on a surface of a wide, flat spatula projecting from a shaft, in which peeling of the electrostatic flock due to friction with a wiping part does not occur even after repeated use.
A first invention is a cosmetic applicator in which electrostatic flocking is implemented on a surface of a spatula formed by forming an application portion in a flat plate shape, forming a root portion in a columnar shape attached to a shaft, and gradually deforming the columnar root portion and the flat application portion from the columnar shape into the plate shape, wherein a projecting portion that projects outward beyond an outer diameter of the shaft is formed on the spatula between the root portion and the application portion, and a part not subjected to flocking is provided between the projecting portion and the root portion.
A second invention is a cosmetic applicator in which the part not subjected to flocking is formed by masking an entire circumference between the projecting portion and the root portion.
A third invention is a cosmetic applicator in which the projecting portion that projects outward beyond the outer diameter of the shaft and a maximum projection portion having a greater width than the projecting portion are formed between the root portion and the application portion, and the part not subjected to flocking is provided between the maximum projection portion and the root portion.
A fourth invention is a cosmetic applicator in which a plate-shaped surface of the application portion is formed at a predetermined angle relative to the shaft.
According to the present invention, a cosmetic applicator obtained by implementing electrostatic flocking on a surface of a wide, flat spatula projecting from an outer diameter of a shaft, in which damage such as peeling of the flock due to friction with a wiping part does not occur even after repeated use, can be provided.
a), 2(b), and 2(c) are, respectively, a front view, a sectional view, and a side view of a wiping part;
a) and 3(b) are, respectively, a side view and a front view of a spatula and a holding portion;
a), 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d) are, respectively, a side sectional view, a front sectional view, a side view, and a front view of a cosmetic application tool incorporating (a first embodiment of) a cosmetic applicator according to the present invention;
a), 5(b), 5(c), and 5(d) are, respectively, a side sectional view, a front sectional view, a side view, and a front view of a cosmetic application tool incorporating (a second embodiment of) the cosmetic applicator according to the present invention; and
Embodiments of a cosmetic applicator according to the present invention will be described in detail below using the drawings.
A wiping part (15) is disposed in the vicinity of a cosmetic extraction port of the storage portion such that when the cosmetic application tool (3) is withdrawn from the storage portion (5), excess cosmetic adhered to the shaft (4) and the applicator (6) is scraped away by an inner hole edge (20) of the wiping part. Further, as shown in
It is necessary for the applicator (6) to fit the shape of the lip, and therefore a material having an appropriate degree of elasticity must be selected for the spatula (7). Further, the applicator (6) is in contact with the cosmetic at all times, and therefore a chemically stable material that does not interact with the cosmetic must be used. Accordingly, the material forming the spatula (7) is preferably an elastomer resin, and preferred examples of the elastomer resin include thermoplastic elastomer and polyurethane elastomer.
To facilitate operations for scooping up the cosmetic and applying the cosmetic to the lips or the like, the spatula (7) preferably has a width of approximately 4.1 to 6.0 mm, a length of approximately 12 to 18 mm, and a thickness of approximately 0.9 to 4 mm. Depending on the type of cosmetic, however, the spatula (7) is not limited to these dimensions. Further, the application portion of the spatula may be tilted in a flat surface direction so as to have a predetermined angle relative to the shaft. To facilitate a cosmetic application operation, the angle is preferably between approximately 10 and 30 degrees.
The spatula (7) serves as the base of the applicator (6), and electrostatic flocking (flocking processing) is implemented on a surface thereof (
There are no particular limitations on the material, thickness, and length of the fiber used in the electrostatic flocking (flocking processing), but nylon or polyester resin fiber having a thickness of approximately 0.9 to 3.3 T (Digitex) and a length of approximately 1 mm, which is typically used for electrostatic flocking implemented on cosmetic tools, is preferable.
The wiping part (15) scrapes away excess cosmetic adhered to the shaft (4) and the applicator (6). Therefore, a diameter of the inner hole (19) of the wiping part is set to be slightly smaller than the outer diameter of the shaft (4) such that when the cosmetic application tool is withdrawn, an increase occurs in the frictional force generated between the part of the application portion (17) that projects beyond the outer diameter of the shaft (4) and the inner hole edge (20) of the wiping part. Hence, when electrostatic flocking is implemented on this part, damage such as peeling of the flock occurs, as shown in
Further, when the plate-shaped surface of the application portion (17) is provided at a predetermined angle relative to the shaft (4), the part between the root portion (16) and the projecting portion (18) of the applicator (6) easily catches on the wiping part during withdrawal of the application tool, and therefore a further increase occurs in the frictional force received from the wiping part, causing even greater damage. Hence, a superior effect is obtained by forming this part as a smooth surface not subjected to flocking.
To mass-produce the cosmetic applicator according to the present invention, masking is applied to an entire circumference of the part between the root portion (16) and the projecting portion (18). Thus, the part between the root portion (16) and the projecting portion (18) can be formed as a smooth surface while simplifying a masking process performed during electrostatic flocking.
Electrostatic flocking (flocking processing) is a surface processing technique in which a subject is coated with an adhesive and short fibers (pile) are implanted by applying a powerful electric field to the adhesive. As a result, a velvety finish is obtained. When the subject includes a part to be subjected to the electrostatic flocking and a part not to be subjected to the electrostatic flocking, a masking process must be implemented on the part not to be subjected to the electrostatic flocking so that the adhesive does not adhere to this part. Further, when a plurality of masking locations exist or the masking location is very small, the process becomes more complicated, leading to problems in terms of operability, production cost, and so on. It is therefore important to simplify the masking process as far as possible during mass-production.
In the cosmetic applicator according to the present invention, masking is performed by covering the entire circumference of the location to be formed as a smooth surface, i.e. the part between the root portion (16) and the projecting portion (18), and therefore the masking location is small and has a simple shape. As a result, an improvement in efficiency can be achieved during mass-production.
During mass-production of the cosmetic applicator, the adhesive is applied after performing the masking process for covering the entire circumference of the part of the applicator (6) between the root portion (16) and the projecting portion (18). At this time, mass-production irregularities such as deviation of the masking position and infiltration of the adhesive through a gap in a mask such that the adhesive adheres to the spatula must be taken into consideration. Hence, to prevent adhesion of the adhesive to the part between the root portion (16) and the projecting portion (18) reliably in the masking process performed during mass-production, an entire circumference of a part extending from the projecting part (18) to a position approximately 1 to 3 mm away in a tip end (22) direction is preferably covered, thereby ensuring covering up to a site where the projecting portion (18) begins to deform from the columnar shape into the flat shape.
The spatula is shaped to be wider than the projecting portion (18) formed between the root portion (16) and the application portion (17), and a maximum projection portion (23) having a maximum width may be formed on the application portion (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010-102181 | Apr 2010 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2011/059588 | 4/19/2011 | WO | 00 | 12/13/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/136078 | 11/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2090354 | Massman | Aug 1937 | A |
2099030 | Morrison | Nov 1937 | A |
2901100 | Mueller et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
3177879 | Smith | Apr 1965 | A |
4627454 | Dahm | Dec 1986 | A |
4856136 | Janssen | Aug 1989 | A |
5176754 | Hirzel | Jan 1993 | A |
5716150 | Gueret | Feb 1998 | A |
6033143 | Gueret | Mar 2000 | A |
6079423 | Suzuki | Jun 2000 | A |
6220254 | Gueret | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227737 | Lightfoot | May 2001 | B1 |
6280112 | Vieu | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6619298 | Gueret | Sep 2003 | B2 |
D538975 | Montoli | Mar 2007 | S |
7866327 | Gueret | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7984721 | Van Alphen | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8250701 | Forsline et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8286649 | Gueret | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297869 | Gueret | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20040018037 | Gueret | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050109365 | Dunton et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20070181143 | Montoli | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080166172 | Eng et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080317542 | Gueret | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100083976 | Montana-Selers | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100129134 | Gueret | May 2010 | A1 |
20120312315 | Gueret | Dec 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1572177 | Feb 2005 | CN |
8-38248 | Feb 1996 | JP |
11-504555 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-222274 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001-8727 | Jan 2001 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Espacenet Bibliographic data for JP 8038248 published Feb. 13, 1996, two pages. |
Espacenet Bibliographic data for JP 11222274 published Aug. 17, 1999, two pages. |
English abstract for PCT/FR97/00353 which corresponds to JP 11-504555 published Apr. 27, 1999, one page. |
Espacenet Bibliographic data for JP 2001008727 published Jan. 16, 2001, two pages. |
International Search Report for corresponding PCT/JP2011/059588 mailed May 31, 2011, two pages. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication No. JP 2004-351208 (Corresponds to CN 1572177), 1 page. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2013, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130074868 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |