This is a 371 National Stage application of International application no. PCT/FR2004/00037, filed Jan. 9, 2004, which claims priority to French application no. 03/00059, filed Jan. 10, 2003. The entire contents of the above-referenced applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The invention relates to the technical sector of orthopaedic implants for the hip joint.
An acetabular implant essentially comprises a metallic cup with a generally hemispherical shape that will be impacted in the acetabular cavity of the iliac bone, in different arrangements, in combination or not in combination with cement. In general, the cup receives a polyethylene, ceramic or metal kernel that will cooperate with a femoral head of a complementary femoral implant, while maintaining an articulation capability. The kernel may be implanted in the internal cavity of the cup, either in a fixed manner or with a displacement or multidirectional capability.
Obviously, different arrangements will have to be made depending on the nature of the kernel (mobile or fixed with respect to the metallic cup). In other words, it is impossible to use the same metallic cup for the assembly of a mobile kernel and for the assembly of a fixed kernel.
For example, consider the information given in patent FR 2 795 302 that describes an acetabular implant comprising a cup that can hold a fixed insert or a mobile insert fixed onto a mobile kernel, while a mobile insert holds a fixed kernel. The solution described in this patent enables only the assembly of a kernel with freedom to move or the assembly of a kernel fixed to an insert mounted with freedom to move in the hemispherical cavity of the cup. The result is that the kernel cooperating with this femoral head is always free to move with respect to the cup.
Starting from this state of the art, the problem that arises and that the invention is intended to solve is to be able to use the same metallic cup depending on the type of arthroplasty to be treated, and to obtain double mobility (mobile kernel—mobile head) or single mobility (fixed insert—mobile head), remembering that in all cases the femoral head is installed with an articulation capability relative to the kernel of the acetabular implant.
An acetabular implant has been developed for a hip prosthesis to solve this type of problem, remarkable in that it comprises:
characterised in that the centre of rotation of the femoral head is different from the axis of rotation of the above mentioned first type of insert and/or the above mentioned second type of insert.
Thus, the centres of rotation of the first type of insert, the second type of insert and the femoral head are aligned but are not coincident.
According to this invention, this task is solved by providing a bipolar cup between the head and the acetabulum, so that the head can rotate in the bipolar cup and the bipolar cup can rotate in the acetabular cavity. This double rotation possibility significantly reduces luxations and sub-luxations. This system is also qualified as a double mobility system or a tripolar system.
According to one embodiment of the invention described below and shown in the attached figures, the implant according to the invention will include a metallic hemispherical shaped cup that can be fixed in the bottom of the acetabular cavity of the iliac bone.
Advantageously, the above mentioned cup will delimit an internal cavity with arrangements for assembly at will, in a fixed manner, of the two above mentioned first and second insert types.
Considering these arrangements, the result is that the first type of insert can provide a means of obtaining double mobility (mobility of the kernel and the femoral head), while the second type of insert can give single mobility (mobility of the femoral head).
If the system is eccentric, it is observed that this eccentricity can lateralise the prosthetic assembly.
The internal hemispherical cavity of the mobile kernel may also be made eccentric from the axis of symmetry.
According to another characteristic, the second type of insert and the mobile kernel are provided with arrangements for the assembly of a ring to assure that the femoral head is retained.
This ring is split so that it can be moved apart elastically to be positioned in complementary shaped arrangements at the opening of the insert or the kernel. The ring delimits a concave internal contact surface related to the hemispherical external contact surface of the femoral head.
The arrangements of the internal layer of the cavity cooperate with complementary arrangements on the outside surface of the two types of inserts to solve the problem that arises to fix each of the insert types into the metallic cup, and thus particularly to make a fixation by a clipping effect.
Advantageously, the arrangements are composed of a series of truncated circular contact surfaces.
Starting from this basic concept, the first type of insert is made of ceramic, polyethylene or metal, while the second type of insert is either ceramic, polyethylene or metal. The kernel itself is either ceramic, polyethylene or metal.
In one advantageous embodiment, the inserts, kernel and the femoral head are made of ceramic.
The first and second types of inserts and the kernel are made either of metal, or polyethylene or ceramic, or a combination of these materials, the femoral head being made either of metal or ceramic or a combination of these materials.
Similarly, it is perfectly possible that these three elements could be made of polyethylene, except for the femoral head. Thus, inserts of the first and second types and the kernel and the femoral head are made either of metal, or polyethylene or ceramic, or a combination of these materials.
The invention is described below in more detail with reference to the Figures in the appended drawings in which:
bis is similar to
According to the invention, the acetabular implant comprises a common hemispherically shaped metallic cup (1). This cup (1) is provided with all necessary arrangements so that it can be fixed in the acetabular cavity of the iliac bone with or without cement. This cup (1) delimits an internal cavity (1a) with arrangements so that the surgeon can choose to install one of two types of inserts (2) or (3).
The choice of the insert type (2) or (3) depends on the desire and the need to increase the head diameter and/or to obtain double mobility or single mobility.
The first type of insert (2) is provided with a spherical internal cavity (2a) for assembly of a hemispherical kernel (4), with freedom to move, the kernel having a hemispherical concave internal cavity (4a) for assembly of a femoral head (T) as provided on the corresponding femoral implant, with an articulation capability. In this embodiment shown in
The second type of insert (3) has an internal cavity (3a) capable of cooperating with the femoral head (T) with an articulation capability. According to this embodiment shown in
Note that the second type of insert (3) (and possibly the insert (2)) and the mobile kernel (4) may be provided with arrangements (3d) and (4b) for assembly of a ring (5) to retain the femoral head (T). For example, a staged circular contact surface is formed concentrically with cavities (3a) and (4a), the circular contact surface having a greater diameter than the said cavities. The ring (5) has an external profile conform with the profile illustrated in
It can also be seen that the diameters of the cavities (3a) and (4a) are identical to hold the same femoral head (T) with a determined diameter. Obviously the diameters of the cavities (3a) and (4a) are determined for a dimensional range corresponding to the diameters of the femoral heads (T)
The internal cavity (1a) of the cup (1) is provided with arrangements for fixed assembly of either of the insert types (2) and (3). To achieve this, these arrangements cooperate with complementary arrangements on the outside face of the insert (2) and the insert (3) particularly for fixation by a clipping effect. To achieve this, in the embodiment illustrated these arrangements consist of a series of truncated circular contact surfaces (2b) and (2c) for an insert (2) and a series of truncated circular contact surfaces (3b) and (3c) for the insert (3).
Obviously, without going outside the scope of the invention, the insert (2) or the insert (3) could be fixed in the internal cavity (1a) of the cup (1) by other complementary assembly forms and by any known and appropriate means.
Advantageously, the first type of insert (2) is made of ceramic, while the second type of insert (3) is made of ceramic and the kernel (4) is also made of ceramic. Similarly, the metallic cup (1) may be provided with any coating and/or treatment of the outside surface.
Starting from this basic concept, in one preferred embodiment the insert, the mobile kernel and the femoral head are all made of ceramic.
The acetabular implant (first or second type of inserts, the kernel and possibly the femoral head) could also be fully metallic.
Considering the basic characteristics of the invention, the centres (O1) of the first type of insert (2), (O2) of the kernel (4) and (O3) of the second type of insert (3) are aligned with each other and along an axis of symmetry (x-x′) of the cup (1) (
As shown in
The main purpose of this invention is to improve prevention of the risk of luxations in hip prostheses in systems according to prior art. Furthermore, other advantages of the invention include the use of two insert types to obtain an assembly with double freedom to move with an intermediate kernel or single freedom to move without an intermediate kernel.
This double freedom to move also reduces risks of luxation and prevents conflict by providing automatic recentring.
Note that in the appended figures, the inserts are protuberant from the metallic cup. Nevertheless, it should be understood that this type of embodiment is not necessary and the device according to the invention will operate equally well.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03 00059 | Jan 2003 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2004/000037 | 1/9/2004 | WO | 00 | 3/10/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/069091 | 8/19/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4437193 | Oh | Mar 1984 | A |
4563778 | Roche et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4566138 | Lewis et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4624674 | Pappas et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4642123 | Noiles | Feb 1987 | A |
4650491 | Parchinski | Mar 1987 | A |
4662891 | Noiles | May 1987 | A |
4666450 | Kenna | May 1987 | A |
4676798 | Noiles | Jun 1987 | A |
4681589 | Tronzo | Jul 1987 | A |
4715860 | Amstutz et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4770661 | Oh | Sep 1988 | A |
4798610 | Averill et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4801301 | Noiles | Jan 1989 | A |
4883490 | Oh | Nov 1989 | A |
4904265 | MacCollum et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4960427 | Noiles | Oct 1990 | A |
4978356 | Noiles | Dec 1990 | A |
5002577 | Bolesky et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5049158 | Engelhardt et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5080678 | Spotorno et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5092898 | Bekki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5156626 | Broderick et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163961 | Harwin | Nov 1992 | A |
5171285 | Broderick | Dec 1992 | A |
5226917 | Schryver | Jul 1993 | A |
5314491 | Thongpreda et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314494 | Huiskes et al. | May 1994 | A |
5425778 | Zichner et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
5507826 | Besselink et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5725591 | DeCarlo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5879398 | Swarts et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879401 | Besemer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5989293 | Cook et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989294 | Marlow | Nov 1999 | A |
6248132 | Harris | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6328764 | Mady | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6527808 | Albertorio et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6527809 | Doursounian et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6610097 | Serbousek et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
20010051831 | Subba Rao et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020116068 | McLean | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030105529 | Synder et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030171817 | Rambert et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040054418 | McLean et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040225369 | Lakin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 091 315 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0 773 007 | May 1997 | EP |
0821922 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1 133 958 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1 195 149 | Apr 2002 | EP |
2700945 | Aug 1994 | FR |
2 793 137 | Nov 2000 | FR |
2 795 302 | Dec 2000 | FR |
2 827 154 | Jan 2003 | FR |
2152386 | Aug 1985 | GB |
9727827 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 0064383 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0209615 | Feb 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Willmann et al., “Keramische Pfanneneinsatze fur Huftendoprothesen” Biomedizinische Technik, vol. 41, No. 4, Apr. 1, 1996, XP 000583024, pp. 98-105. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060167556 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |