Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotors

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7975750
  • Patent Number
    7,975,750
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 8, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 12, 2011
    13 years ago
Abstract
A Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor, wherein damping is provided Coulomb friction in generally coextensive relation with the braking surfaces of the one or more rotor cheeks. The Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor has at least one interfacial boundary formed in at least one rotor cheek disposed in generally coextensive relation to the braking surface thereof. The interfacial boundary provides a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to disc brake rotors used in automotive applications, and more particularly to Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotors in which the damping is provided by at least one interfacial boundary disposed in substantially coextensive relation with a braking surface of at least one rotor cheek thereof.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Motor vehicle disc brake systems utilize a disc brake rotor at each respective wheel, wherein the disc brake rotor typically includes a rotor hat for connecting to an axle hub of a rotatable axle of the motor vehicle, and at least one annular rotor cheek connected to the rotor hat, wherein the at least one rotor cheek has a pair of mutually opposed braking surfaces onto which brake pads are selectively applied when braking is desired. Typically, the rotor cheek configuration may be solid, in which case a single rotor cheek has opposing braking surfaces thereon, or may be vented, in which case a pair of rotor cheeks are mutually separated by a web of ventilation vanes and each rotor cheek provides a respective braking surface so that, in combination, two mutually opposed braking surfaces are provided.


The disc brake system further typically includes a caliper which supports a mutually opposed pair of brake pads, one brake pad disposed overlying a respective rotor cheek braking surface, wherein the caliper, the brake pads, and other associated brake components collectively form a “brake corner”. Normally, the caliper keeps the brake pads separated from the braking surfaces of the one or more rotor cheeks. Braking of the motor vehicle occurs at the brake corner by the caliper pressing the brake pads upon the braking surfaces of the one or more rotor cheeks. Frictional interaction between the one or more rotating rotor cheeks and non-rotating brake pads causes braking of the motor vehicle to transpire, the rate of braking depending upon the pressure of the brake pads against the braking surfaces.


Brake squeal can be undesirably generated at the brake corner when braking occurs. This brake squeal is the result of modal excitations of the disc brake rotor (composed usually of cast iron) by the frictional material of the brake pads. It is known in the prior art that brake squeal can be addressed by reducing modal excitation on the disc brake rotor by the friction material of the brake pads (ie., lowering the frictional coefficient), by modifying the modal excitation response of the brake corner via changing the modal properties of the rotor cheeks (ie., in terms of resonant frequencies, mode shapes, and structural damping through higher carbon content of the one or more rotor cheeks and/or increasing the disc brake rotor mass, or using exotic, expensive materials), and by introducing additional damping for example via a shim disposed at a backing plate of the brake pads.


The aforementioned brake squeal countermeasures are relatively effective for most brake corner designs, but they require a significant amount of testing and analytical resources in order to be effective. And unfortunately, brake corners for performance motor vehicles, or those motor vehicles with high friction lining materials, are resistant to the prior art brake squeal countermeasures, due to the high amount of modal excitation from the friction material of the brake pads.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,257 describes a concept directed toward reducing unwanted disc brake noise via a ring damper affixed around the periphery of the disc brake rotor in a manner which permits relative motion and slippage between the ring damper and the disc brake rotor when the disc brake rotor vibrates during braking. In a preferred embodiment, a groove formed at the periphery of the rotor cheek and the ring damper is disposed in the groove with a pre-loading both radially and transversely.


While the concept described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,257 is noteworthy in that an attempt is made to apply Coulomb friction damping to reduce brake squeal, it falls short of this goal. The reason for this is the requirement that the ring damper must be peripherally disposed on the disc brake rotor. Unfortunately, the modal excitations induced during braking at the brake corner arise at the contact between the brake pads and the braking surfaces of the one of more rotor cheeks. Therefore, reliance on radial loading that the peripheral placement of the damping ring of U.S. Pat. No. 5,855,257 cannot achieve adequate brake squeal damping in the region of the disc brake rotor coextensively with the braking surfaces of the rotor cheek.


Accordingly, what remains needed in the art is to somehow provide damping disposed in generally coextensive relation to the braking surfaces of the one or more rotor cheeks.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor, wherein damping of the modal excitations is provided generally coextensively with the braking surfaces of the one or more rotor cheeks.


The Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention has at least one interfacial boundary formed in at least one rotor cheek which is disposed in generally coextensive relation to the braking surface thereof. In this regard, by “interfacial boundary” is meant a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween, and wherein the term “Coulomb friction” represents the energy absorption processes at the interface between two material surfaces through mechanical interaction of the surfaces, as for example temperature, pressure, time, etc.


In a preferred embodiment of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention, an insert is disposed in at least one rotor cheek of a disc brake rotor having either a solid or vented rotor cheek configuration, wherein the insert provides mutually opposed interfacial boundaries with respect to the surrounding rotor cheek, and wherein the insert is annularly configured and disposed generally coextensively with a braking surface of the rotor cheek. Alternatively, a plurality of inserts may be provided in the one or more rotor cheeks. Alternatively further, the interfacial boundary may be provided by an interstice formed in the rotor cheek in which the surfaces of rotor cheek which define the interstice mutually form therebetween the interfacial boundary, wherein any number of interstices may be provided in one or more rotor cheeks.


In a method of manufacture of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention, the subject rotor cheek may be machined or molded with one or more interstices so as to provide an interfacial boundary at each, or is machined or molded to provide one or more annular slots into each of which an insert is respectively cast, inserted, wound into or otherwise located therein so as to provide a pair of interfacial boundaries at each insert. In another method of manufacture according to the present invention, the subject rotor cheek is molded around one or more pre-manufactured inserts.


It is further believed that a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention has the following attributes: 1) the greater the surface area of the interfacial boundaries, the greater will be the damping; 2) the greater the number of interfacial boundaries, the greater will be the damping; 3) pre-tensioning and/or pre-loading is not required so long as the interfacial boundary provides Coulomb friction damping; and finally, 4) the thickness of the insert may be optimized based upon experimentation (ie., a smallest possible thickness while still providing at least one interfacial boundary), and it is thought to be optimal if the thickness of the insert is small relative to the thickness of the rotor cheek


While the noise damping benefits of the invention have been developed for brake rotor applications, it is apparent that the invention may be utilized in other articles having body portions that are subject to mechanical vibrations and body surfaces that radiate noise. It is apparent that the inclusion of one or more interstices or inserts can be used within body portions of such articles and near noise making surfaces to provide a damped article.


Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor, wherein damping is provided generally coextensively with the braking surfaces of the one or more rotor cheeks. An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a damped article having a noise producing surface on a body portion wherein sound damping is provided within the body using an interstice(s) and/or an insert(s) within the body to provide friction engaging surfaces for reducing noise.


This and additional objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become clearer from the following specification of a preferred embodiment.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention having a solid rotor cheek configuration and a single insert.



FIG. 2 is a sectional view of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a detail of the sectional view of FIG. 2, showing in particular the rotor cheek and its insert.



FIG. 4 is an exploded perspective view of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 is a plot of brake squeal of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor of FIG. 1, wherein the plot is of squeal frequency versus sound pressure, and wherein the plot is undetectably small.



FIG. 6 is a plot of brake squeal of a conventional disc brake rotor without damping, wherein the plot is of squeal frequency versus sound pressure.



FIG. 7 is a comparative set of plots for frequency response functions of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor of FIG. 1 and the conventional disc brake rotor without damping, wherein the plots are of vibrational frequency versus mobility.



FIG. 8 is an alternative embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention, wherein the insert is fully embedded within a rotor cheek.



FIG. 9 is another alternative embodiment of a Coulomb damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention, wherein a pair of inserts are provided in a rotor cheek.



FIGS. 10A through 10C depict various views of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a vented rotor cheek configuration in which an insert is provided at each cheek, and wherein an anchorage is provided at the radially inward end of the inserts.



FIGS. 11A and 11B depict various views of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a vented rotor cheek configuration in which an insert is provided only at a single rotor cheek (the hat proximal rotor cheek), and wherein an anchorage is provided at the radially inward end of the insert.



FIGS. 11C and 11D depict various views of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a vented rotor cheek configuration in which an insert is provided only at a single rotor cheek (the hat distal rotor cheek), and wherein the rotor cheek having the insert is shown optionally thicker than the rotor cheek having no insert.



FIGS. 12A and 12B depict another alternative embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention, wherein at least one interstice provides at least one interfacial boundary in a rotor cheek.



FIGS. 13A through 13C depict sequential views of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a solid rotor cheek configuration, wherein the insert is wound into an annular slot of the rotor cheek.



FIGS. 13D through 13F depict sequential views of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a vented rotor cheek configuration, wherein an insert is wound, respectively, into each annular slot of the two rotor cheeks.



FIGS. 14A through 14E depict sequences of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a solid rotor cheek configuration, in which FIG. 14B pertains to providing a metallic insert molded into an annular slot of the rotor cheek, and FIG. 14C pertains to providing a polymer, ceramic or metal powder insert molded into or otherwise located in the annular slot of the rotor cheek.



FIGS. 14F through 14J depict sequences of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a vented rotor cheek configuration, in which FIG. 14G pertains to providing a metallic insert molded into, respectively, an annular slot of each of the two rotor cheeks, and FIG. 14H pertains to providing a polymer, ceramic or metal powder insert molded into or otherwise located in, respectively, the annular slot of each of the two rotor cheeks.



FIGS. 15A through 15F depict sequential views of a method of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a solid rotor cheek configuration, wherein an insert is pre-manufactured and the disc brake rotor is cast therearound.



FIGS. 15G through 15M depict sequential views of a method of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor having a vented rotor cheek configuration, wherein a pair of inserts and a web pattern are pre-manufactured and the disc brake rotor is cast therearound.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to the Drawing, FIGS. 1 through 7 depict various aspects of an example of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 for motor vehicle disc brake applications according to the present invention, FIGS. 8 through 12 depict various alternative configurations of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention, and FIGS. 13A through 15M depict various examples of manufacturing methods for a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention.


Turning attention firstly to FIGS. 1 through 3, the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 has, by way of non-limiting example, a rotor hat 102 (which need not be present for purposes of the present invention), a rotor cheek 104 of solid rotor cheek configuration, and an insert 106 disposed within the rotor cheek, wherein the insert is generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 108 of the rotor cheek. In this regard, the insert 106 radially extends, from a radially inward edge 106ie to a radially outward edge 106oe, a distance R which is generally coextensive with the radial extent of the radially inward edge 108ie and the radially outward edge 108oe of the braking surfaces 108 of the rotor cheek 104, and further annularly extends around the rotor cheek. The insert 106 provides a pair of oppositely disposed interfacial boundaries 110 between the insert and the rotor cheek 104, wherein the interfacial boundaries each have a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.



FIG. 4 depicts a manufacturing methodology for the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 of FIGS. 1 through 3, in which an annular slot 112 is machined radially into the rotor cheek 104 so as to be generally coextensive with the braking surfaces, and wedge shaped insert components 106a, 106b, 106c and 106d (there could be alternatively two semi-circular insert components) are pressed into the slot to thereby collectively form the insert 106 shown at FIGS. 1 through 3.



FIGS. 5 through 6 show comparative brake corner noise data obtained utilizing a brake noise dynamometer of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 and a conventional disc brake rotor without damping, referred to hereafter as a “baseline” disc brake rotor. The resulting test plots were generated by utilizing using identical test procedures, dynamometers and brake corners for each of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 and the baseline disc brake rotor. The noise plot N depicted in FIG. 5 is that of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 and has a magnitude too small to be detected, indicating the brake corner is quiet. In contradistinction, noise plot N′ of the baseline brake disc rotor depicted in FIG. 6 shows a high magnitude of noise both in the warm section (diamond symbols) and the cold section (square symbols) thereof. The difference between the noise plots N, N′ was due to the high level of damping occurring only at the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 according to the present invention.



FIG. 7 shows frequency response function (FRF) test plots comparatively of the FRF plot F for the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 and of the FRF plot F′ of the baseline disc brake rotor. It will be seen that the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 had a greater than one order of magnitude increase in damping (disc brake rotor loss factor) as compared to that of the baseline disc brake rotor. In this regard, the 6th nodal diametrical mode ND6 for the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor has a loss factor greater than 0.037, whereas ND6 for the baseline disc brake rotor has a loss factor of 0.0012; and the 7th nodal diametrical mode ND7 for the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor has a loss factor greater than 0.046, whereas ND7 for the baseline disc brake rotor has a loss factor of 0.0010. Again, this result is attributed to the damping occurring only in the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100 according to the present invention.


Turning attention now to FIGS. 8 through 12, various alternative embodiments of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention will be discussed.



FIG. 8 depicts an alternative embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100a according to the present invention in which the insert 106a is generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 108a, and is completely surrounded by the rotor cheek 104a, providing a pair of interfacial boundaries 110a. This embodiment of the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor is applicable to solid or vented rotor cheek configurations, a solid rotor cheek configuration being shown merely by way of exemplification.



FIG. 9 depicts another alternative embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100b according to the present invention in which the insert 106a is generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 108b, and in which a pair of inserts 106b are disposed within the same rotor cheek 104b, each providing a pair of interfacial boundaries 110b (in this regard, if they touch then they would share an interfacial boundary). It will be understood that while two inserts are shown, any number of inserts may be provided. It will further be understood that an embodiment having a plurality of inserts is applicable to both a solid rotor cheek configuration and to each, or either, rotor cheek of a vented rotor cheek configuration.



FIGS. 10A through 10C depict yet another embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100c according to the present invention having a vented rotor cheek configuration composed of a first (hat proximal) rotor cheek 104p and a second (hat distal) rotor cheek 104d, the rotor cheeks being mutually separated by a web 104w of ventilation vanes. An insert 106cp is provided in the first rotor cheek 104p and an insert 106cd is provided in the second rotor cheek 104d, both inserts being generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 108c, and each providing a pair of interfacial boundaries 110c. Optionally, an anchorage 106an is provided at the radially inward edge 106cie, wherein the anchorage is in the preferable form of a bulbous which interferingly engages the surrounding rotor cheek.



FIGS. 11A and 11B depict still another embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100d according to the present invention having a vented rotor cheek configuration in which only the first (hat proximal) rotor cheek 104pd has an insert 106d which generally coextensively extends with the braking surfaces 108d, and providing a pair of interfacial boundaries 110d. The second (hat distal) rotor cheek 104dd has no insert.



FIGS. 11C and 11D depict an additional embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100e according to the present invention having a vented rotor cheek configuration in which only the second (hat distal) rotor cheek 104de has an insert 106e which generally coextensively extends with the braking surfaces 108e and provides a pair of interfacial boundaries 110e. The first (hat proximal) rotor cheek 104pe has no insert. Now, by way merely of example, the second rotor cheek 104de is thicker than the first rotor cheek 104pe so as to accommodate the thickness of the insert 106e; however, this increased thickness is an optional feature.


It is to be understood that all the variations of Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor embodiments exemplified above may be mixed and varied. For example, a single rotor cheek, or both rotor cheeks, of a vented rotor cheek configuration may have a plurality of inserts.



FIG. 12A depicts yet another embodiment of a Coulomb friction damped brake rotor 100f according to the present invention in which an interfacial boundary 110f is provided by an interstice 120 formed in the rotor cheek 104f, wherein the surfaces of rotor cheek which define the interstice mutually form therebetween the interfacial boundary, and whereat therebetween Coulomb friction is present. The interstice is generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 108f. FIG. 12B depicts a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 100f′, wherein a plurality of interstices 120a, 120b each provide an interfacial boundary 110f in the rotor cheek 104f thereof, wherein the interstices each are generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 108f. It is to be understood that one or more interstices may be provided in one or both rotor cheeks of a vented rotor cheek configuration.


Referring now to FIGS. 13A through 15M, various exemplar methodologies of manufacture of a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor according to the present invention will be detailed, wherein it is to be understood that the methodologies presented herein are merely by way of exemplification and not limitation.


In FIGS. 13A through 13C, a disc brake rotor 200 has a rotor cheek 202 of solid rotor cheek configuration, having an annular slot 204 provided therein, as for example by being machined therein or provided at the time of casting. The annular slot 204 extends radially inward so as to be generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 206 of the rotor cheek 202. As shown at FIG. 13B, a filament 208 is wound into the slot 204 so as to form an insert 210 coextensive with the braking surfaces 206, thereby providing a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 216, as depicted in FIG. 13C. The Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 216 has interfacial boundaries 212 with the rotor cheek 202 so as to have damping therewith, and, advantageously, has additional damping at the interfacial boundaries 214 at the mutually contacting surfaces of the filament 208. The filament 208 is non-limiting, and includes any highly elongated material capable of being wound into the slot, as for example metallic wire or thread of non-metallic material.



FIGS. 13D through 13F depict sequential manufacturing steps as those described in FIGS. 13A through 13C, wherein now a disc brake rotor 200′ having vented rotor cheek configuration having two rotor cheeks 202a, 202b with braking surfaces 206′ is depicted, and wherein now primes denote similar functioning parts as those described above in FIGS. 13A through 13C. In this regard, the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 216′ has filaments 208a, 208b wound, respectively, into each annular slot 204′ so as to thereby form inserts 210′ which are generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 206′. Each of the inserts 210′ provide interfacial boundaries 212′ in each of the two rotor cheeks 202a, 202b so as to have damping therewith, and, advantageously, has additional damping at the interfacial boundaries 214′ at the mutually between contacting surfaces of each filament 208a, 208b.


In FIGS. 14A through 14E, a disc brake rotor 300 has a rotor cheek 302 of solid rotor cheek configuration, having an annular slot 304 provided therein, as for example by being machined therein or provided at the time of casting. The annular slot 304 extends radially inward so as to be generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 306 of the rotor cheek 302. The disc brake rotor 300 is placed into a mold 308a, 308b. In a first case of manufacture, shown at FIG. 14B, molten metal 310 of a preselected composition to maximize damping and ease of casting is molded by being cast or injected into the annular slot 304. In a second case of manufacture, shown at FIG. 14C, a high temperature polymer, a metal powder, or a ceramic paste 312 is molded by being injected into the annular slot 304. In this regard if a metal powder is used, the powder is compacted into the annular slot under pressure then placed in an oven and sintered in a controlled atmosphere at elevated temperature so that the powder coalesces into a solid body with a predefined porosity (which can be zero), wherein a tolerance, for example, of 0.3% is expected, and if a suitable coating in the slot is used to lessen gapping at the interface boundary with the rotor cheek, a tolerance, for example, of 0.1% can be expected. In either case of manufacturing methods shown in FIGS. 14A through 14E, a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 314 is provided, as shown at FIGS. 14D and 14E, wherein the insert 316 provided thereby in the annular slot is generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 306 and provides a pair of interfacial boundaries 318.


It is to be noted that if the annular slot 304 is cast into the rotor cheek 302, then no machining need be provided, and the disc brake rotor 300 is placed into the mold 308a, 308b. In order that the material used for the insert 316 be subsequently locked into place, the groove may be sprayed with a coating or otherwise have the surface thereof treated (e.g., shot peening or surface roughing), or an aforementioned anchorage (that is, a mechanical interlock) can be pre-cast into the annular slot 304. The coating and insert material composition have a synergistic relationship to provide optimum interfacial boundaries between the disc brake rotor and the solidified insert to maximize damping and minimize brake noise. The molding of the insert subsequent to the casting of the disc brake rotor can be achieved by any suitable means including, for example, a permanent mold die, or the disc brake rotor can be used as an insert in a die casting machine.



FIGS. 14F through 14J depict sequential manufacturing steps as those described in FIGS. 14A through 14E, wherein now a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 314′ having a vented rotor cheek configuration having two rotor cheeks 302a, 302b is provided, starting with a disc brake rotor 300′, wherein now primes denote similar functioning parts as those described above in FIGS. 14A through 14E. In this regard, the Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 314′ has a molded insert 316′ provided at FIGS. 14G and 14H, per any of the manufacturing methodologies described above with respect to FIGS. 14B and 14C, respectively, in each annular slot 304′. The inserts 316 are generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 306′ and provide interfacial boundaries 318′ in each of the two rotor cheeks 302a 302b so as to have damping therewith.


In FIGS. 15A through 15F, a disc brake rotor is molded by casting around a pre-manufactured insert 400 (see FIG. 15A). The insert 400 is placed into a mold 402 (see FIG. 15B) and becomes part of the mold package (see FIG. 15C). Molten metal 404 is then poured into the mold 402. The insert 400 may be, for example, metallic or may be a ceramic that could be reinforced. Once removed from the mold (see FIGS. 15E and 15F), a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 406 having a solid rotor cheek configuration is provided, wherein the insert 400 is generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 408 of the rotor cheek 412 and provides a pair of interfacial boundaries 410. An advantage of this method of manufacture is that the insert 400 can be totally encapsulated within the rotor cheek 412, as for example depicted at FIG. 8. Further, the insert 400 may be sprayed with a coating or otherwise have its surface treated (e.g., shot peening or surface roughing) to optimize the seating thereof in the annular slot formed therearound by rotor cheek. More than one insert may be cast over by formation of the disk brake rotor.



FIGS. 15G through 15M depict sequential manufacturing steps as those described in FIGS. 15A through 15F, wherein now a vented rotor cheek configuration having two rotor cheeks 412a, 412b (see FIGS. 15L and 15M) is provided, wherein now primes denote similar functioning parts as those described above in FIGS. 15A through 15F. In this regard, a pre-manufactured sacrificial web pattern 414 is provided and is sandwiched in a mold 402′ between two pre-manufactured inserts 400a, 400b. Molten metal 404′ is poured into the mold 402′, and the sacrificial web pattern serves to provide a vaned ventilation web 416 of the metal 404′. In each rotor cheek 412a, 412b of the manufactured Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor 406′, the inserts 400a, 400b are generally coextensive with the braking surfaces 408′ and provide interfacial boundaries 318′ so as to have damping therewith.


It is to be understood that any of the manufacturing methodologies described hereinabove can be readily adapted to provide multiple inserts in the rotor cheeks.


Further, it is to be noted that any of the manufacturing methodologies described hereinabove can be used for other articles which require noise damping.


To those skilled in the art to which this invention appertains, the above described preferred embodiment may be subject to change or modification. Such change or modification can be carried out without departing from the scope of the invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for manufacturing a Coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor, comprising the steps of: providing at least one insert having a coating sprayed thereon; andforming a disc brake rotor in a mold comprising casting molten metal substantially surrounding the at least one insert, wherein a rotor cheek of the disc brake rotor is formed over the at least one insert so that the insert is embedded in the rotor cheek, wherein the rotor cheek has at least one braking surface, and wherein the at least one insert is substantially coextensive with the at least one braking surface;wherein the at least one insert and the rotor cheek provide at least two interfacial boundaries, each interfacial boundary defining an interstice between a rotor cheek inner surface and a surface of the insert and providing a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between the rotor cheek inner surface and the surface of the insert which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein: said step of providing provides at least two inserts; andsaid step of forming forms a disc brake rotor having a vented cheek configuration comprising two rotor cheeks, wherein each of the two rotor cheeks is formed over at least one insert of the at least two inserts, respectively, and wherein each rotor cheek has a respective braking surface, and wherein the at least two inserts are substantially coextensive with the braking surfaces.
  • 3. A method of manufacturing a coulomb friction damped disc brake rotor as set forth in claim 1, wherein the forming a disc brake rotor comprises surrounding at least three sides of the insert with the rotor cheek.
  • 4. A method for manufacturing a damped article comprising the steps of: providing at least one insert; andforming the article, wherein the article is formed over the at least one insert so that the at least one insert is substantially surrounded and embedded in the article;wherein the at least one insert provides at least four interfacial boundaries, the interfacial boundaries providing a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
  • 5. A method as set forth in claim 4 wherein the insert includes flat portion and a bulbous positioned to interferingly engage the rotor cheek.
  • 6. A method comprising: providing at least one insert; andcasting a disc brake rotor that comprises at least one substantially solid rotor cheek having at least one braking surface over the at least on insert so that the at least one insert is embedded in the rotor cheek and surrounded on at least five sides by the rotor cheek;wherein the at least one insert provides at least one interfacial boundary, the interfacial boundary providing a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
  • 7. A method as set forth in claim 6, wherein the at least one insert is substantially coextensive with the at least one braking surface of the rotor cheek.
  • 8. A method for manufacturing a damped article comprising the steps of: providing at least one insert; andforming the article, wherein the article is formed over the at least one insert so that the at least one insert is substantially surrounded and embedded in the article;wherein the at least one insert provides at least three interfacial boundaries, the interfacial boundaries providing a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
  • 9. A method as set forth in claim 8, wherein the article comprises a brake rotor having at least one braking surface and wherein the at least one insert is substantially coextensive with the at least one braking surface of the rotor cheek.
  • 10. A method as set forth in claim 8 wherein the insert includes a bulbous positioned to interferingly engage the rotor cheek.
  • 11. A method comprising: providing at least one insert; andcasting a disc brake rotor that comprises at least one substantially solid rotor cheek having at least one braking surface over the at least one insert so that the at least one insert is embedded in the rotor cheek and surrounded on at least five sides by the rotor cheek;wherein the at least one insert provides at least one interfacial boundary, the interfacial boundary providing a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
  • 12. A method comprising: providing at least one insert; andplacing the at least one insert in a casting mold half and supporting the at least one insert in the mold half by at least one post or chaplet;casting a disc brake rotor that comprises at least one substantially solid rotor cheek having at least one braking surface over the at least one insert, and wherein the insert includes an upper face, a lower face and an inner radial side connecting the upper face and lower face, and so that the at least one insert is embedded in the rotor cheek and surrounded on the upper face, the lower face and the inner radial side by the rotor cheek;wherein the at least one insert provides at least one interfacial boundary, the interfacial boundary providing a mechanically distinguishable surface boundary between two surfaces which are in mutual contact such that a state of Coulomb friction exists therebetween.
  • 13. A method as set forth in claim 12, wherein the at least one insert is substantially coextensive with the at least one braking surface of the rotor cheek.
  • 14. A method as set forth in claim 12 wherein the insert includes a bulbous positioned to interferingly engage the rotor cheek.
US Referenced Citations (126)
Number Name Date Kind
0974024 Carter Oct 1910 A
1484421 Thomspon Feb 1924 A
1989211 Norton Jan 1935 A
2012838 Tilden Aug 1935 A
2026878 Farr Jan 1936 A
2288438 Dach Jun 1942 A
2603316 Pierce Jul 1952 A
2978793 Lamson et al. Apr 1961 A
3085391 Hatfield et al. Apr 1963 A
3127959 Wengrowski Apr 1964 A
3147828 Hunsaker Sep 1964 A
3292746 Robinette Dec 1966 A
3378115 Stephens, III Apr 1968 A
3425523 Robinette Feb 1969 A
3509973 Kimata May 1970 A
3575270 Wagenfuhrer et al. Apr 1971 A
3774472 Mitchell Nov 1973 A
3841448 Norton, Jr. Oct 1974 A
3975894 Suzuki Aug 1976 A
4049085 Blunier Sep 1977 A
4072219 Hahm et al. Feb 1978 A
4195713 Hagbjer et al. Apr 1980 A
4250950 Buxmann et al. Feb 1981 A
4278153 Venkatu Jul 1981 A
4281745 Wirth Aug 1981 A
4338758 Hagbjer Jul 1982 A
4379501 Hagiwara et al. Apr 1983 A
4475634 Flaim et al. Oct 1984 A
4523666 Murray Jun 1985 A
4529079 Albertson Jul 1985 A
4905299 Ferraiuolo et al. Feb 1990 A
5004078 Oono et al. Apr 1991 A
5005676 Gassiat Apr 1991 A
5025547 Sheu et al. Jun 1991 A
5083643 Hummel et al. Jan 1992 A
5115891 Raitzer et al. May 1992 A
5139117 Melinat Aug 1992 A
5143184 Snyder et al. Sep 1992 A
5183632 Kluchi et al. Feb 1993 A
5184662 Quick et al. Feb 1993 A
5259486 Deane Nov 1993 A
5310025 Anderson May 1994 A
5416962 Passarella May 1995 A
5417313 Matsuzaki et al. May 1995 A
5509510 Ihm Apr 1996 A
5530213 Hartsock et al. Jun 1996 A
5582231 Siak et al. Dec 1996 A
5620042 Ihm Apr 1997 A
5660251 Nishizawa et al. Aug 1997 A
5789066 DeMare et al. Aug 1998 A
5819882 Reynolds et al. Oct 1998 A
5855257 Wickert et al. Jan 1999 A
5862892 Conley Jan 1999 A
5878843 Saum Mar 1999 A
5927447 Dickerson Jul 1999 A
5965249 Sutton et al. Oct 1999 A
6047794 Nishizawa Apr 2000 A
6073735 Botsch et al. Jun 2000 A
6112865 Wickert et al. Sep 2000 A
6206150 Hill Mar 2001 B1
6216827 Ichiba et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223866 Giacomazza May 2001 B1
6231456 Rennie et al. May 2001 B1
6241055 Daudi Jun 2001 B1
6241056 Cullen et al. Jun 2001 B1
6283258 Chen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302246 Naumann et al. Oct 2001 B1
6357557 DiPonio Mar 2002 B1
6367598 Sporzynski Apr 2002 B1
6405839 Ballinger et al. Jun 2002 B1
6465110 Boss et al. Oct 2002 B1
6481545 Yano et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505716 Daudi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6507716 Nomura et al. Jan 2003 B2
6543518 Bend et al. Apr 2003 B1
6648055 Haug et al. Nov 2003 B1
6799664 Connolly Oct 2004 B1
6880681 Koizumi et al. Apr 2005 B2
6890218 Patwardhan et al. May 2005 B2
6899158 Matuura et al. May 2005 B2
6932917 Golden et al. Aug 2005 B2
6945309 Frait et al. Sep 2005 B2
7066235 Huang Jun 2006 B2
7112749 DiPaola et al. Sep 2006 B2
7178795 Huprikar et al. Feb 2007 B2
7219777 Lin May 2007 B2
7293755 Miyahara et al. Nov 2007 B2
7380645 Ruiz Jun 2008 B1
7568560 Lin Aug 2009 B2
7594568 Hanna et al. Sep 2009 B2
7604098 Dessouki et al. Oct 2009 B2
7644750 Schroth et al. Jan 2010 B2
7775332 Hanna et al. Aug 2010 B2
7836938 Agarwal et al. Nov 2010 B2
20020007928 Guetlbauer et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020084156 Ballinger et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020104721 Schaus et al. Aug 2002 A1
20030037999 Tanaka et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030127297 Smith et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030141154 Rancourt et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030213658 Baba Nov 2003 A1
20040031581 Herreid et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040045692 Redemske Mar 2004 A1
20040074712 Quaglia et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040084260 Hoyte et al. May 2004 A1
20040242363 Kohno et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050011628 Frait et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050150222 Kalish et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050183909 Rau et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193976 Suzuki et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060076200 Dessouki et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060243547 Keller Nov 2006 A1
20070039710 Newcomb Feb 2007 A1
20070056815 Hanna et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070062664 Schroth et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070062768 Hanna et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070119667 Hanna et al. May 2007 A1
20070142149 Kleber Jun 2007 A1
20070166425 Utsugi Jul 2007 A1
20070235270 Miskinis et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070298275 Carter et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080099289 Hanna et al. May 2008 A1
20080185249 Schroth et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090032569 Sachdev et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090056134 Kleber et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090107787 Walker et al. Apr 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (38)
Number Date Country
428319 Jan 1967 CH
200510113784.X Oct 2005 CN
20051113784 Oct 2005 CN
1757948 Apr 2006 CN
2863313 Jan 2007 CN
24 46 938 Apr 1976 DE
2446938 Apr 1976 DE
25 37 038 Mar 1977 DE
2537038 Mar 1977 DE
19649919 Jun 1998 DE
199 48 009 Mar 2001 DE
19948009 Mar 2001 DE
60000008 Mar 2002 DE
101 41 698 Mar 2003 DE
10141698 Mar 2003 DE
102005048258.9 Oct 2005 DE
102005048258 Apr 2006 DE
60116780 Nov 2006 DE
0 205 713 Dec 1986 EP
0205713 Dec 1986 EP
1230 274 Apr 1971 GB
1230274 Apr 1971 GB
2 328 952 Mar 1999 GB
54052576 Apr 1979 JP
57154533 Sep 1982 JP
57154533 Sep 1982 JP
1126434 Aug 1989 JP
05-104567 Apr 1993 JP
11342461 Dec 1999 JP
2001512763 Aug 2001 JP
2003214465 Jul 2003 JP
2004011841 Jan 2004 JP
20010049837 Jun 2001 KR
9823877 Jun 1998 WO
WO 9823877 Jun 1998 WO
0136836 May 2001 WO
WO 0136836 May 2001 WO
2007035206 Mar 2007 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060076200 A1 Apr 2006 US