The invention relates to novel pharmacological uses of pharmaceutical composition based on coumarin derivative 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (1) as an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).
Technical problem is related to safe and efficient therapy for treatment of asthma and other inflammatory respiratory diseases.
The technical problem that is solved by the present invention is based on the compound 1 and its use as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), in the form of various pharmaceutical final dosage forms suitable for therapeutic use.
Asthma or bronchial asthma is a widespread chronic disease of the air passages of the lungs which inflames and narrows them. It is characterized by recurrent attacks of breathlessness, wheezing, bronchospasm, coughing, and chest tightness. Episodes of asthma attacks can vary in severity and frequency from person to person. These symptoms may occur several times during a day or week in affected individuals, and for some people become worse during physical activity or at night. World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 235 million people worldwide currently suffer from this disease. The fundamental causes of asthma are not fully understood. Asthma cannot be cured, but adequate management can control the disease and enable people to enjoy a good quality of life; see literature reference 1:
The therapy of asthma includes short-term medications which are used to relieve symptoms. An example of such drugs is salbutamol or terbutaline. The progression of severe asthma can be controlled by long-term administration of anti-inflammatory steroids like beclomethasone dipropionate and fluticasone propionate or furoate, etc; see literature reference 2:
Whilst some anti-asthmatic drugs are applied by inhalation, another one are administered orally or topically, e.g. prednisone or prednisolone, theophylline, as well as leukotriene antagonists and inhibitors like montelukast, zafirlukast, etc; see literature reference 3:
Beside asthma, examples of other inflammatory respiratory diseases are: allergic rhinitis and sinusitis, acute respiratory disease syndrome (ARDS), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); see literature reference 4:
The therapy of these diseases is, beside antihistamines and nasal decongestants for allergic rhinitis and sinusitis are also based on above mentioned anti-inflammatory drugs.
Coumarins are a well-known class of chemical substances of various valuable pharmacological activities; for instance see literature reference 5:
4-Hydroxycoumarins undergo an aldol-type condensation reaction with aldehydes yielding corresponding 1-hydroxyalkyl derivatives of parent aldehyde at 3-position of starting 4-hydroxycoumarin. This type of condensation products was already studied from both synthetic and pharmacological points of view. Thus, Meroep and co-workers disclosed the condensation products of various 4-hydroxy coumarins with glyoxal yielding several compounds of general formula I of anti-inflammatory activity. Furthermore, in another application they described 2,7,9-trihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-2,3-dihydro-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (2), for which they also reported anti-inflammatory activity; see literature references 6 and 7:
Additionally, Ivezić disclosed alkoxy-derivatives of corresponding bis-condensation products of general formula II.
The latter compounds were tested on antiviral activity including the anti-HIV activity; see literature reference 8:
These are relatively the most similar compounds from the prior art, but compound 2 and compounds of general formula II can establish more interactions with various enzyme active sites, e.g. at least one hydrogen-bond more than the compound 1 (from the present invention) in the same situation; 2 as hydrogen-bond donor thanks to the hydrogen atom at 2-hydroxy-furane moiety, and II as hydrogen-bond acceptor due to proton-accepting potential of oxygen atom of 2-alkoxy-furane moiety.
Thus, from standpoint of pharmaceutical chemistry and pharmacology, there exist significant structural differences between the known compounds from the classes I and II or compound 2 versus compound 1 from the present invention.
According to our best knowledge, the closest prior art is our previous patent application wherein we disclosed the coumarin derivative 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (1), its synthesis, various pharmaceutical final dosage forms, and pharmacological activity as therapeutic agent for treatment of either viral or, specifically, immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infections; see literature reference 9:
Additionally, the use of compound 1 through its various pharmaceutical final dosage forms for therapy of asthma and other inflammatory respiratory diseases, to our best knowledge, has not been disclosed in the prior art.
The invention discloses novel pharmacological uses of pharmaceutical composition based on the coumarin derivative 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (1) as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API); for use in the therapy of asthma or other inflammatory respiratory diseases such as allergic rhinitis and sinusitis, acute respiratory disease syndrome, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The invention also describes the process for production of said pharmaceutical composition.
The present invention discloses novel pharmacological uses of pharmaceutical composition comprising:
Other respiratory diseases are selected from the group consisting of:
The present invention also discloses the process for manufacturing of this pharmaceutical composition.
The composition of the present invention can be in various final dosage forms that are selected by the manner of use and include the following forms:
The pharmaceutical excipient required to prepare final dosage forms is one or more substances selected from the group comprising:
Filler is selected from the group comprising: lactose, saccharose, mannitol, sorbitol, maltitol, xylitol, dextrin, maltodextrin, starch, microcrystalline cellulose, inulin, calcium carbonate, mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable fillers.
Diluent is selected from the group comprising: purified water; ethanol; 1,2-propylene glycol; glycerol; polyethyleneglycols (PEG) like PEG 400; plant oils like sunflower oil, sesame oil, or medium-chain triglycerides; mutually miscible or emulsifiable mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable diluents.
Purified water that is used as the diluents in the composition of the present invention meets the requirements of European pharmacopoeia 8.0, p. 3561-3562 for pharmaceutical water.
Emollient is selected from the group comprising: petroleum jelly; mineral oil; plant oils like almond, sunflower, or sesame oil; medium-chain triglycerides; natural or synthetic esters of monovalent alcohols with higher fatty acids like isopropyl myristate, jojoba oil, or beeswax; silicone oil; higher fatty acids like stearic acid; higher fatty alcohols like cetyl alcohol; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable emollients.
Emulsifier is selected from the group comprising: lanolin; ethoxylated lanolin; lanolin alcohols; ethoxylated lanolin alcohols; lecithin; hydrogenated lecithin; mono- and diesters of glycerol with higher fatty acids like glyceryl monostearate; sorbitan esters with higher fatty acids such as sorbitan monostearate; ethoxylated higher fatty alcohols or acids like polyoxyethylene(20) laurylether or polyoxyethylene(2) oleate, wherein numbers 20 and 2 represents the number of ethyleneglycol units; esters of ethoxylated sorbitan like polysorbate 60; water soluble soaps like sodium stearate; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable emulsifiers.
Binder is selected from the group comprising: glucose syrup; glucose-fructose syrup; honey; saccharose; lactose; gelatine; sorbitol; maltitol; xylitol; cellulose gums like hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), methyl cellulose (MC), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (NaCMC); synthetic polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyacrylic acid (PAA) and its copolymers, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP); hyaluronic acid; various gums like gum arabic, xanthan gum, guar gum, tragacanth; alginic acid and its salts like sodium alginate; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable binders.
Disintegrant is selected from the group comprising: crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP); sodium starch glycolate; crosslinked sodium carboxymethylcellulose (NaCMC); modified starches; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable disintegrants.
Lubricant is selected from the group comprising: magnesium, calcium, aluminium, and zinc soaps, e.g. magnesium stearate; higher fatty acids like stearic acid; talc; colloidal silica (silicon dioxide); mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable lubricants.
Humectant is selected from the group comprising: glycerol; 1,2-propylene glycol; hexylene glycol; liquid sorbitol; d-panthenol; polyethylene glycols; other commonly known pharmaceutically acceptable humectants, or their mixtures.
Thickener is selected from the group comprising: cellulose gums like hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), methyl cellulose (MC), sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (NaCMC); synthetic polymers such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyacrylic acid (PAA) and its copolymers, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP); various gums like gum arabic, xanthan gum, guar gum, tragacanth; alginic acid and its salts like sodium alginate; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable thickeners.
Chelating agent is selected from the group comprising: sodium, or potassium salts of ethylenediaminotetraacetic (edetic) acid (EDTA); diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA); nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA); water soluble citrate salts like trisodium citrate dihydrate; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable chelating agents. Representative example of such chelating agent is disodium edetate dihydrate (Na2EDTA.2H2O).
Preservative is selected from the group comprising: parabens like methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, ethyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, propyl 4-hydroxybenzoate, butyl 4-hydroxybenzoate; 4-chloro-m-cresol; triclosan; chlorobutanol; chlorhexidine and its salts; quaternary ammonium salts such as benzalkonium chloride or cetrimonium bromide; benzoic acid; sorbic acid; benzyl alcohol; 2-phenoxyethanol; dehydroacetic acid (3-acetyl-2-hydroxy-6-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one); mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable preservatives.
Antioxidant is selected from the group comprising: ascorbic acid, its salts and esters like calcium ascorbate or ascorbyl palmitate; 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT); tert-butyl-anisole (BHA); propyl gallate; α-tocopherol and its esters like α-tocopheryl acetate; rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) extract; mixtures of these substances, or other pharmaceutically acceptable antioxidants.
As active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of the composition from the present invention compound 1 or pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof were employed.
Since free phenolic OH groups of the compound 1 do act as acids, the corresponding salts with pharmaceutically acceptable, non-toxic bases can be prepared. Such salts do have certain advantages over free acid 1 due to eventually increased water solubility.
Examples of useful bases that can be employed for preparation of various pharmaceutically acceptable salts of compound 1 are selected from the group comprising: sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH), magnesium hydroxide [Mg(OH)2], calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2], ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH), tetramethyl/ethylammonium hydroxide [R4N+OH−; R═CH3, C2H5], choline hydroxide [(CH3)3N(CH2CH2OH) OH], other pharmaceutically acceptable bases, or mixtures of these substances in various molar ratios.
The syntheses of compound 1 and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts were performed by the procedure disclosed in our previous patent application; see literature reference 9.
Preparation of the Composition from the Present Invention
The composition from the present invention involves all pharmaceutically useful final dosage forms as described above.
The technology for preparation of various final dosage forms is known to the person skilled in the art of pharmaceutical technology;
The process for production of pharmaceutical composition according to the present invention is consisting of the following steps:
Final dosage form of powder including the inhalation powder is manufactured by homogenization of powderous ingredient 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (1) which serves as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) with one or more powderous excipients selected from the group comprising: filler, lubricant, and optionally, other pharmaceutical excipients.
Thus obtained powder can be granulated, by using one or more suitable diluents and binders, yielding dosage forms of granules. Diluents like purified water for wet granulation process are used on quantum satis (q.s.) principle.
Powders and granules can be compacted to give final dosage forms of tablets, or alternatively, filled into gelatin or various vegetable capsules furnishing final dosage form of capsules.
Liquid dosage forms such as oral solution, suspension, or syrup are prepared by dissolution of compound 1 in a suitable diluent like purified water, or mixtures of purified water with humectants and thickeners. Liquid formulations based on predominantly water have to be preserved against microbiological spoilage by addition of suitable preservative.
Topical dosage form of ointment is prepared by homogenization of fine powderous compound 1 into the hydrophilic or lipophilic ointment base. The former are, for instance, a mixture of solid and liquid polyethylene glycols (PEG), whilst the latter are various mixtures of waxes, plant oils, lanolin, etc.
Creams and lotions from the class of water-in-oil (W-O) or oil-in-water (O-W) emulsions are prepared by homogenization of compound 1 in the corresponding base emulsions.
There can be many other preparation technologies of the composition of the present invention in all mentioned and other possible final dosage forms, what is known to the person skilled in the art of pharmaceutical technology.
For demonstration, typical final dosage forms of the composition from this invention are given in Examples 4-10.
Cytotoxicity of compound 1 was determined through the study of cell growth and viability by the methods of determination of maximal non-toxic concentration (MNC) and concentration required for cell viability by 50% (CC50). Maximal non-toxic concentration (MNC) was defined as the highest concentration of the test substance 1, which does not cause injury or death of the treated cells. Cytotoxic concentration at 50% (CC50) was defined as the concentration of the test substance 1 at which 50% of the cells die as a result of toxicity of the test substance.
Cytotoxicity assays are performed to predict potential toxicity, using cultured cells which may be normal or transformed cells. These tests normally involve short term exposure of cultured cells to test substances, to detect how basal or specialized cell functions may be affected by the substance, prior to performing safety studies in whole organisms. Assessment parameters for cytotoxic effects include inhibition of cell proliferation, cell viability markers (metabolic and membrane), morphologic and intracellular differentiation markers and others; see literature reference 11:
Evaluation of cytotoxicity was an important part of the assessment of anti-asthmatic activity of compound 1 since its beneficial therapeutic effect at asthma and other inflammatory respiratory diseases should be selective with little or no effects on the metabolism of host cells. The study of cytotoxicity of compound 1 was performed on two types of cell lines of murine fibroblasts L20B and L929 from European collection of cell cultures (ECACC).
Cell viability was estimated by a modification of the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay which is one of the most frequently used methods for measuring cell proliferation and cytotoxicity; see literature reference 12:
Cell viability was reported as the percentage (%) of viable cells in the wells treated with different concentrations of the test compound 1, compared to the control cells untreated with the substance. Maximal non-toxic concentration (MNC) and cytotoxic concentration for 50% of cells (CC50) were calculated from the constructed “dose-cellular survival” curve.
Dynamics of survival of murine cells treated with compound 1 at 48 h were presented in Table 1, whilst in vitro cytotoxicity data were summarized in Table 2.
Detailed experimental procedure was described in Example 1.
a MNC = maximal non-toxic concentration.
b CC50 = cytotoxic concentration for 50% cells.
When microscopic observation of the morphology of the mono-layers were carried out at 48 h after the treatment with tested compound 1 in different concentration range (0.0001-10 mg/mL), typical cytopathology characterizing the toxic effect was not registered in both tested cell lines. We found some morphology changes of the cell lines in comparison with the cell control only in wells treated with the highest concentrations 10 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL, whose impact could be due to the highest content of the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). To evaluate whether this effect is due to the toxicity of the tested compound 1 or DMSO, mortgaging control of medium DMEM or MEM supplemented with 2% FBS and DMSO. We conducted a test with the same concentration range as the test compound 1. The results show that the concentration of DMSO in the lowest dilutions is extremely small and does not have a toxic effect on the tumor and normal cells.
In conclusion, the results showed that the tested compound 1 exhibit low cytotoxicity against both murine cell lines L20B and L929. These results were dose-dependent. According to MNC values, compound 1 at 48 h expressed 10× higher cytotoxicity against L929 cells than those on L20B cell line. According to CC50 values, compound 1 at 48 h expressed the same cytotoxicity.
We concluded that these results additionally strongly support the initial hypothesis that compound 1 is essentially non-toxic, and thus can be safely used as the pharmaceutical active substance (API). Certainly, further toxicological studies have to be performed for its detail safety profile evaluation, but this is obviously not essential for demonstration of novelty and inventive step of this invention.
Skin is responsible for the communication between an organism and the environment and is constantly subjected to exogenous stimuli. The main function of the skin is to protect the organism from environmental insults. Fulfilling its role, the skin is able to activate a defense mechanism aimed at pathogen elimination and tissue repair; see literature references 13 and 14:
Initiation of the defense response is characterized by the infiltration of neutrophils and the release of several proinflammatory mediators, which starts the inflammatory process. Acute inflammation is characterized by classical symptoms, such as heat, redness, swelling and pain. Edema (swelling) is therefore a good measure of inflammation and is useful for the quantification of skin inflammation induced by phlogistic agents such as croton oil. Croton oil-induced ear edema is a widely used method for studying the inflammatory process in skin, and for identifying anti-inflammatory agents that could be useful in the treatment of skin disorders; see literature reference 15:
The presents study aims to detect the inflammatory/anti-inflammatory potential effects of compound 1 in a model of acute skin inflammation induced by local application of phlogistic agent croton oil in Balb/c mice. The technique for croton oil-induced ear edema in mice, originally described by Tubaro et al., was followed, with modifications; see literature references 16 and 17:
Croton oil is a phlogistic agent extracted from Croton tiglium L., Euphorbiaceae, which exhibits an irritant and vesiculant effect on the skin. Croton oil contains phorbol esters, predominantly 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Topical application of croton oil or TPA promotes an acute inflammatory reaction characterized by vasodilatation, polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration to the tissue and edema formation. These changes are triggered by protein kinase C (PKC) activation, which promotes an increase in the activity of phospholipase A2 (PLA2). Activation of PLA2 results in increased levels of arachidonic acid and its metabolites, such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Moreover, PKC also promotes the secretion and activation of several immune mediators such as cytokines and chemokines which increase and maintain the skin inflammatory response; see literature references 18-20:
We extended the treatment up to 6 h to measure the peak of inflammation. Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg), represents the reference anti-inflammatory drug. Mice (total 40) were separated into 4 groups (n=10). Each group was treated under different regimen:
Right ear: croton oil
Left ear: acetone
Group 2: Dexamethasone+Croton Oil (after 30 Min)
Right ear: dexamethasone+croton oil
Left ear: 80% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodexin (2HPβCD)+20% DMSO
Group 3: Compound 1+Croton Oil (after 30 Min)
Right ear: compound 1+croton oil
Left ear: 80% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodexin+20% DMSO
Right ear: nothing
Left ear: nothing
Cutaneous inflammation was induced in conscious mice by topical application of croton oil (5% in acetone). Acetone was applied to the left ear, which served as a control; indeed, it has been previously demonstrated that acetone did not induce changes in the ear weight; see literature reference 21:
Corticosteroids are not present in a traditional Chinese medicine formulation for atopic dermatitis in children. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 35 (2006) 759-763.
Six hours after croton oil application, mice were euthanized by light ether anaesthesia, followed by cervical dislocation; both left (acetone) and right (croton oil in acetone) ears were removed, by cutting horizontally across the indentation at the base of the ear. For each mouse, the extent of the oedema was expressed as the difference in weight (Δ [mg]) between right (inflamed) and left (uninflamed) ear. The percentage increase in the oedema of the treated ear was calculated by the following formula:
Topical application of croton oil caused a significant inflammatory response in mouse skin, as determined by the increase in ear weight, when compared to the ear that received only vehicle (acetone) at 6 h. Effect of compound 1 and dexamethasone on croton oil-induced ear inflammation and induced a reduction of the ear oedema provoked by the local application of croton oil in Balb/c mice; approximately 60% maximal inhibition for dexamethasone and 40% for compound 1 was observed. Results are presented in Table 3.
aThe ear oedema was expressed as the difference in weight (Δ [mg]) between right (inflamed) and left (uninflamed) ear.
bPercentage of increasing the ear edema at different treatment regimen.
cPositive control: Group 1: acetone (left ear), croton oil (right ear).
dIn the case of testing standard dexamethasone and compound 1, croton oil was applied after 30 minutes.
eNegative control (no treatment).
Detailed experimental procedure is described in Example 2 and graphically shown in
As explained earlier, asthma is characterized by airway inflammation, airway obstruction and bronchial hyper responsiveness; see literature reference 22 and 23:
Asthma can be caused by various factors like allergens, drugs, respiratory infection, dust, cold air, exercise, emotions, occupational stimuli, chemicals, histamine, etc. Allergen provocation in asthma induces both an immediate asthmatic response (IAR) and a late-phase asthmatic response (LAR), both of which require long-term anti-inflammatory therapy; see literature reference 24:
In asthma patients, there is an accumulation of neutrophils, macrophages, activated mast cells, eosinophils, and T cells in the air spaces after antigen sensitization; see literature references 23 and 25:
There is now convincing evidence that cytokines secreted by T cells or other immune cells, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, IL-12, and interferon-g (IFN-g), in response to antigen stimulation play a role in lung inflammation and asthma. IL-6 serves as chemotactic factor for various leukocyte population and is an important proinflammatory factor. In patients with asthma, the levels of inflammatory cells, T-cells, and cytokines have been shown to be significantly elevated in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids, suggesting a possible pathological role for these cells; see literature references 26-28:
Animal models have been used to elucidate asthma pathophysiology, and to identify and evaluate novel therapeutic targets. Allergen challenge models reproduce many features of clinical asthma and have been widely used by investigators; however, the majority involve acute allergen challenge procedures. It is recognised that asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease resulting from continued or intermittent allergen exposure, usually via inhalation, and there has been a recent focus on developing chronic allergen exposure models, predominantly in mice.
Although many different sensitisation and challenge protocols have been used, the basic model is consistent. Acute sensitisation protocols require multiple systemic administration of the allergen in the presence of an adjuvant. Adjuvants such as aluminium hydroxide (AlOH3) are known to promote the development of the Th2 phenotype by the immune system when it is exposed to an antigen. Sensitisation solely via the airways has also been attempted using both ovalbumin (OVA) and house dust mite (HDM).
With the OVA models, after the sensitisation period, usually 14-21 days, the animal is challenged with the allergen via the airway, usually over a period of several days. Allergen may be inhaled as a nebulised formulation (aerosol), or administered by intranasal (i.n.) instillation of an aqueous formulation.
The acute challenge mouse models reproduce many key features of clinical asthma, for example elevated levels of IgE, airway inflammation, mucus secretion, goblet cell hyperplasia, epithelial hypertrophy, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to specific stimuli. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and histology studies indicate that the influx of inflammatory cells is dominated by eosinophils.
The study was performed on female 8-week old Balb/c mice. The animals were kept under specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions with temperature control and HEPA system for breeding of laboratory animals. Experiments were performed during the light phase of the cycle. 40 mice (n=10/group) were separated into 4 groups:
Group 1: OVA only
Group 2: OVA+BECLOMETHASONE (1 mg/kg)
Group 3: OVA+Compound 1 (preventively; 2 mg/kg)
Group 4: OVA+Compound 1 (therapeutically; 2 mg/kg)
Each group of mice was sensitized on days 0 and 14 with 20 μg/mouse of OVA adsorbed on 2 mg alum. On days 20, 21 and 22 the animals were stimulated with 100 μg/mouse OVA intranasally in a final volume of 50 μL/mouse.
The first group (the positive control) was injected with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) only.
The second and third groups were treated preventively with compound 1 (2 mg/kg) or beclomethasone (1 mg/kg) on days 18-22 via the airway.
The fourth group was treated therapeutically with compound 1 (2 mg/kg) on days 23-25 via the airway.
The detailed treatment schedule is presented in the
The experimental procedure was carried out as described in Example 3 according to literature reference 29:
We examined the effect of compound 1 treatment in the cell response on OVA-induced airway inflammation. OVA (100 μg/50 μL of PBS) was introduced intranasally (i.n.) 6 days after the second intraperitoneal (i.p.) sensitization with OVA. The treatment with compound 1 (preventively and therapeutically), beclomethasone or PBS only was performed according the treatment schedule; see
Two days after the last i.n. challenge, BAL cells were collected, and differential cell counts were performed to identify the number of various infiltrating inflammatory cells, see
Challenge of OVA induced eosinophil and macrophages infiltration into the lung, but blocked lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration. The treatment with compound 1 (either preventively or therapeutically):
In contrast, standard anti-inflammatory active pharmaceutical ingredient beclomethasone, used as a standard in this experiment:
Lungs from the Balb/c mice from the test-groups were isolated and fixed in 10% formalin with 4 mL of the same solution introduced intratracheally prior the overnight fixation. Paraffin sections from the lungs were analyzed using a standard haematoxylin/eosin staining technique.
Histological analysis of sections of the lung tissue recovered from mice 2 days after a last treatment showed variation in the degree of asthma-like pathology, see
After allergen challenge, significantly more eosinophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and neutrophils were observed in challenged BALB/c mice. Massive cell infiltration was found in the lungs of the animals from OVA group treated with PBS only. Eosinophil and other inflammatory cell infiltration and differences in the lung histology between Beclomethasone-treated and compound 1—treated (either preventively or therapeutically) animals were not observed, see
Enhanced airway mucus production results from airway inflammation and is hallmark of allergic asthma. Thus, mechanisms that suppress immune responses in the lung could result in suppression of mucus production. Mucus production was measured 2 days after i.n. challenge in experimental mice that were treated with compound 1 or beclomethasone (as standard) and lung sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff stain (PAS). Mucus production in the lung was quantitated immunohistologically by evaluation of mucus-positive epithelia.
PAS staining showed the increased mucus production in inflamed tissues of OVA group lungs treated with PBS only.
Mice that received compound 1 either therapeutically or preventively showed a significant reduction of mucin production, compared with mice that received no treatment; see
Similar reduction was observed in the mice group treated with standard antiinflammatory API beclomethasone.
These results indicate that compound 1 treatment that suppress the recruitment of immune cells to the lung also suppress mucus production, a pathological consequence of airway inflammation.
Experimental results are described in Example 3.
Th2 cytokine and eotaxin production in allergic asthma: the Th2-associated cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and eotaxin are central to the development of allergic asthma and OVA-sensitised mice exhibited high levels of interleukin 5 (IL-5). To investigate the treatment effect of compound 1, immunohistology from serial lung sections was performed 2 days after i.n. challenge in experimental mice that were treated with the compound 1 or beclomethasone as standard antiinflammatory and anti-asthmatic API.
IL-5 staining showed the increased cytokine production in inflamed tissues of OVA group lungs treated with PBS only; see
Acute OVA provocation displayed evidence of an activated phenotype as characterized by CCL11 (eotaxin) expression in a subpopulation of lung cells. CCL11 staining showed stained positive for eotaxin cells of OVA group lungs treated with PBS only, see
Experimental results are described in Example 3.
Use of the Composition from this Invention
The composition of the present invention based on 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one
Depending on the kind of final dosage form, the composition of the present invention can be administered: by inhalation, orally, topically, parenterally, or by any other suitable manner of therapeutic application.
The therapy involves one or more administrations per day of pharmaceutically effective doses from 0.1-15 mg/kg of body weight, what represents 7.5-1.125 mg of active compound 1 per average adult person of 75 kg body weight.
MTT method was performed spectrophotometrically on Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, VT, USA). The microscope on which the histology was carried out was Nikon eclipse E100 (Nikon Instruments Europe B.V., Amstelveen, Netherlands).
Room temperature (r.t.) means the temperature interval of 20-25° C.
Cytotoxicity of compound 1 was determined through the study of cell growth and viability by the methods of determination of maximal non-toxic concentration (MNC) and concentration required for cell viability by 50% (CC50).
The compound 1 (Mw=410.02) under study were first dissolved in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) to a concentration of 0.1 mol/L (0.1 M) as a stockade later diluted in cell growth medium Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich) with 2% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum.
The study of cytotoxicity of compound 1 was performed on two types of murine fibroblasts cell lines: L20B and L929 from European collection of cell cultures (ECACC). Cells were routinely maintained as adherent cell cultures in DMEM medium and containing 10% Fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 U/mL penicillin G sodium (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 μg/mL streptomycin sulphate (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37° C. in a humidified air incubator containing 5% carbon dioxide (CO2). Cultivation of the cells was continued with direct monitoring every two or three days using a phase contrast microscope. The cells are harvested in 1× trypsin/EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were passages 1:3-1:5 at a density around 5-6·104 cells/mL, while the passage was re-suspended repeatedly.
Methods of determining cell growth, cell viability, maximal non-toxic concentration (MNC) and concentrations, required cell viability by 50% (CC50): Cell viability was estimated by a modification of the MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay; see literature reference 12. The MTT reduction assay is one of the most frequently used methods for measuring cell proliferation and cytotoxicity. The intensity of colour (measured spectrophotometrically) of the MTT formazan produced by living, metabolically active cells by measuring the activity of succinate dehydrogenase, mostly located in mitochondria was proportional to the number of live cells present. MTT was a yellow water-soluble tetrazolium dye that was reduced by live, but not dead cells to a purple formazan product that was insoluble in aqueous solutions.
Each cell line was plated at an appropriate density (7.5·103 cells/well for L20B cell culture and 4·104 cells/well for L929 cell culture) in 96-well plates (Costar Corning; USA) for 24 h. When the adherent cells were stuck to the plastic, the supernatant was decanted and 50 μL of previously prepared diluted solutions of tested compound 1 were added. The well was completed with culture medium (150 μL) to a final volume of 200 μL. The plate was incubated for 48 h at 37° C. and 5% content of CO2. The cells grown in the medium without compound 1 served as a negative control. After 48 h incubation, the medium was replaced with MTT (Sigma-Aldrich) and dissolved at a final concentration of 5 mg/mL in serum-free medium, for further 3 h incubation. Then, the MTT-formazan product was solubilized in a mixture of ethanol:DMSO (1:1, V/V), and the optical density was measured at a test wavelength of 540 nm in microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments) using wells without sample containing cells as blanks. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate. Cell viability was reported as the % of viable cells in the wells treated with different concentrations of the tested compound compared to the control untreated cells. MNC and CC50 were calculated from the constructed “dose-cellular survival” curve.
Dynamics of survival of murine cells treated with compound 1 at 48 h were presented in Table 1.
Both MNC and CC50 values were evaluated simultaneously by morphological and by cell survival criteria. The results obtained in both cells lines are given in Table 2.
The presents study aims to detect the inflammatory/anti-inflammatory potential effects of compound 1 in a model of acute skin inflammation induced by local application of phlogistic agent croton oil in Balb/c mice. The technique for croton oil-induced ear edema in mice, originally described by Tubaro et al., was followed, with modifications; see literature references 16 and 17.
We extended the treatment up to 6 h to measure the peak of inflammation. Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg), represents the reference anti-inflammatory drug. Mice (total 40) were separated into 4 groups (n=10). Each group was treated under different regimen:
Right ear: croton oil
Left ear: acetone
Group 2: Dexamethasone+Croton Oil (after 30 Min)
Right ear: dexamethasone+croton oil
Left ear: 80% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodexin+20% DMSO
Group 3: Compound 1+Croton Oil (after 30 Min)
Right ear: compound 1+croton oil
Left ear: 80% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodexin+20% DMSO
Right ear: nothing
Left ear: nothing
Cutaneous inflammation was induced in conscious mice by topical application of croton oil (5% in acetone). Acetone was applied to the left ear, which served as a control; indeed, it has been previously demonstrated that acetone did not induce changes in the ear weight; see literature reference 21.
In preliminary experiments, the effect of subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of saline, 100% DMSO or 20% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin was investigated to check the vehicle effects on ear inflammation. Because DMSO significantly reduced croton oil-induced oedema, compound 1 (2 mg/kg) was dissolved in a vehicle containing 20% DMSO and 80% 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, in amounts which did not change ear swelling per se. The positive control dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) was administered 30 min before the topic application of croton oil.
Six hours after croton oil application, mice were euthanized by light ether anaesthesia, followed by cervical dislocation; both left (acetone) and right (croton oil in acetone) ears were removed, by cutting horizontally across the indentation at the base of the ear. For each mouse, the extent of the oedema was expressed as the difference in weight (Δ [mg]) between right (inflamed) and left (uninflamed) ear. The percentage increase in the oedema of the treated ear was calculated by the following formula:
The statistical significance between the groups was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc Tukey test. The accepted level of significance for the test was P<0.05. All tests were carried out using GraphPad Software (San Diego, Calif., USA).
Topical application of croton oil caused a significant inflammatory response in mouse skin, as determined by the increase in ear weight, when compared to the ear that received only vehicle (acetone) at 6 h. Effect of compound 1 and dexamethasone on croton oil-induced ear inflammation and induced a reduction of the ear oedema provoked by the local application of croton oil in Balb/c mice; approximately 60% maximal inhibition for dexamethasone and 40% for compound 1. Results are presented in Table 3 and in
The acute challenge mouse models reproduce many key features of clinical asthma, for example elevated levels of IgE, airway inflammation, mucus secretion, goblet cell hyperplasia, epithelial hypertrophy, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to specific stimuli.
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and histology studies indicate that the influx of inflammatory cells is dominated by eosinophils.
OVA and beclomethasone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Mo., USA). Aluminium hydroxide [alum; Al(OH)3] was purchased from BulBio (Sofia, Bulgaria). Compound 1 (Mw=410.02) was synthesized by the process described in literature reference 9.
Female 8-week old Balb/c mice were obtained from Harlan Farm (Blackthorn, UK). The animals were kept under specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions with temperature control and HEPA system for breeding of laboratory animals. The manipulations were approved by the Animal Care Commission at the Institute of Microbiology in accordance with the International regulations (EU Directive 2010/63/EU).
Experiments were performed during the light phase of the cycle. The animals were allowed to adapt to the laboratory for at least 1 h before testing and were used only once. 40 mice (n=10/group) were separated into 4 groups:
Group 1: OVA only
Group 2: OVA+beclomethasone (1 mg/kg)
Group 3: OVA+compound 1 (preventively; 2 mg/kg)
Group 4: OVA+compound 1 (therapeutically; 2 mg/kg)
Each group of mice was sensitized on days 0 and 14 with 20 μg/mouse of OVA adsorbed on 2 mg alum. On days 20, 21 and 22 the animals were stimulated with 100 μg/mouse OVA intranasally in a final volume of 50 μL/mouse.
The first group (the positive control) was injected with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) only.
The second and third groups were treated preventively with compound 1 (2 mg/kg) or beclomethasone (1 mg/kg) on days 18-22 via the airway.
The fourth group was treated therapeutically with compound 1 (2 mg/kg) on days 23-25 via the airway.
The detailed treatment schedule is presented in the
The experimental procedure was carried out as described in literature reference 22. The procedure is as follows:
The effect of compound 1 treatment in the cell response on OVA-induced airway inflammation was examined. OVA (100 μg/50 μL of PBS) was introduced intranasally (i.n.), 6 days after the second intraperitoneal (i.p.) sensitization with OVA. The treatment with compound 1 (preventively and therapeutically), beclomethasone or PBS only was performed according the treatment schedule; see
Two days after the last i.n. challenge, BAL cells were collected, and differential cell counts were performed to identify the number of various infiltrating inflammatory cells, see
Challenge of OVA induced eosinophil and macrophages infiltration into the lung, but blocked lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration. The treatment with compound 1 (either preventively or therapeutically) strongly suppressed the eosinophil infiltration into the lungs, but stimulate macrophages, lymphocyte and neutrophil infiltration compared to PBS treated animals.
In contrast, standard anti-inflammatory active pharmaceutical ingredient beclomethasone, used as a standard in this experiment suppressed the eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration, but also induced moderate lymphocyte and macrophages response.
Lungs from the Balb/c mice from the test-groups were isolated and fixed in 10% formalin with 4 mL of the same solution introduced intratracheally prior the overnight fixation. Paraffin sections from the lungs were analyzed using a standard haematoxylin/eosin staining technique.
Histological analysis of sections of the lung tissue recovered from mice 2 days after a last treatment showed variation in the degree of asthma-like pathology, see
After allergen challenge, significantly more eosinophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and neutrophils were observed in challenged BALB/c mice. Massive cell infiltration was found in the lungs of the animals from OVA group treated with PBS only. Eosinophil and other inflammatory cell infiltration and differences in the lung histology between beclomethasone-treated and compound 1-treated (either preventively or therapeutically) animals were not observed, see
Mucus production was measured 2 days after i.n. challenge in experimental mice that were treated with compound 1 or beclomethasone (as standard) and lung sections were stained with PAS. Mucus production in the lung was quantitated immunohistologically by evaluation of mucus-positive epithelia.
PAS staining showed the increased mucus production in inflamed tissues of OVA group lungs treated with PBS only. Mice that received compound 1 either therapeutically or preventively showed a significant reduction of mucin production, compared with mice that received no treatment; see
Similar reduction was observed in the mice group treated with standard antiinflammatory API beclomethasone.
These results indicate that compound 1 treatment that suppress the recruitment of immune cells to the lung also suppress mucus production, a pathological consequence of airway inflammation.
Composition (for 1000 g of tablets):
Composition (for 1000 g of homogeneous mixture for capsules filling):
Composition (for 100 g of nebuliser solution):
The product was in the form of almost odourless to pale yellow liquid. Analysis showed the content of 0.1 mg/mL±10% of compound 1. The solution was filled into 20 mL plastic (PE-HD) bottles with inhalation device suitable for administration via inhalation of fine mist.
Composition (for 100 g of inhaling powder):
Compound 1 monosodium salt was prepared according to the procedure described in literature reference 9.
Composition (for 100 g of injection solution):
The product was in the form of pale yellow almost odourless liquid. Analysis showed the content of 1.0 mg/mL±10% of compound 1. The solution was filled into 20 mL plastic (PE-HD) bottles with spraying device or alternatively into containers pulmonal aerosols suitable as inhalation device.
Composition (for 100 g of ointment):
Composition (for 100 g of cream):
The composition from the present invention based on 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (1) its pharmaceutically acceptable salts or hydrates thereof as the active pharmaceutical ingredient and one or more pharmaceutical excipients, required to yield final dosage forms suitable for therapeutic administration, clearly exhibits a profound:
Compound 7,9-dihydroxy-3-(4,5,7-trihydroxy-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-yl)-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one (1) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or hydrate thereof is used as active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) for production the composition used in manufacturing of medicament for treatment of asthma and other inflammatory respiratory diseases. Thus the industrial applicability of this invention is obvious.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/058349 | 4/7/2017 | WO | 00 |