Counter balanced effluence transfer system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6550649
  • Patent Number
    6,550,649
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 6, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A counter balanced effluence transfer system for the transfer of effluence from a source container into a receiving reservoir comprises a receiving reservoir having a cover plate and a reservoir top opening, and a counter balanced mechanism located above the receiving reservoir, which includes a pivot point, a source-side member attached to one side of the pivot point and a balance-side member attached to the other side of the pivot point. While the size and weight of the source-side member are made the same as those of the balance-side member, an angular asymmetry is built in between the source arm and the balance arm so that the gravitational source torque Ts and the gravitational balance torque Tb are made unequal. Upon release of the counter balanced mechanism with a latching starting mechanism, the counter balanced mechanism would automatically rotate and complete the pouring of source effluence into the receiving reservoir.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention is related to an effluence transfer system. More specifically, this invention concerns a semi-automatic, totally mechanical system for the transfer, using gravity, of a variety of effluence including, but not limited to, fluids, chemicals and flowable slurries using gravity.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The existence and operation of a wide variety of effluence transfer systems have been around for a long time. An example of a simple mechanical effluence transfer system is a hand-cranked pump to draw water from a source reservoir and transfer it to a receiving bottle. A second example of a totally sealed and sophisticated system for the transferring of hazardous chemical slurry from a mixing tank to a reactor module is an electronic-controlled peristaltic pump having automatic pressure and flow-sensors and using a totally sealed system of chemical-resistant piping. However, for the semi-automatic transferring of effluence from containers, with capacity up to a few gallons, into a receiving reservoir there has been the need of a simple mechanical system that is safe, reliable and simple to operate.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The first objective of this invention is to devise a counter balanced effluence transfer system, or CBETS, that is semi-automatic and totally mechanical.




The second objective of this invention is to provide for a CBETS that is safe, reliable and simple to operate.




Other objectives, together with the foregoing are attained in the exercise of the invention in the following description and resulting in the embodiment illustrated in the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS




The current invention will be better understood and the nature of the objectives set forth above will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments. For clarity of explanation, the detailed description further makes reference to the attached drawings herein:




FIG.-


1


illustrates a first side view of the current CBETS in its initial starting state wherein a handle component and an integral safety interlock feature are both placed in its latched position to prevent the starting of the effluence transferring process;




FIG.-


2


and FIG.-


3


illustrate, via a top view of part of the CBETS, the functionality of the above-mentioned integral safety interlock feature that is integrated with a receiving reservoir cover plate;




FIG.-


4


illustrates a second side view of the current CBETS in its starting state wherein the above-mentioned handle component has been moved into its unlatched position to enable the starting of the effluence transferring process;




FIG.-


5


illustrates a third side view of the current CBETS during the middle of the effluence transferring process wherein the effluence of a source container has been partially transferred into a receiving reservoir;




FIG.-


6


illustrates a fourth side view of the current CBETS toward the end of the effluence transferring process wherein the effluence of a source container has been completely transferred into a receiving reservoir;




FIG.-


7


illustrates a fifth side view of the current CBETS wherein the above-mentioned handle component is partially pulled down toward its initial latched position;




FIG.-


8


illustrates a sixth side view of the current CBETS that returned to its initial starting state with the above-mentioned handle component returned to its latched position;




FIG.-


9


illustrates a side view of another embodiment of the current CBETS wherein a component of balance container is replaced with a balance weight; and




FIG.-


10


illustrates a side view of yet another embodiment of the current CBETS wherein a component of adjustable damper mechanism is moved to a higher position compared to that illustrated in FIG.-


5


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will become obvious to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures and components have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessary obscuring aspects of the present invention.




Reference herein to “one embodiment” or an “embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristics described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments.




FIG.-


1


illustrates a first side view of the current CBETS in its initial starting state wherein a handle component and an integral safety interlock feature are both placed in its latched position to prevent the starting of the effluence transferring process. Source effluence


2


enclosed inside source container


1


, whose cap has previously been separately removed, is to be transferred into receiving reservoir


10


that is illustrated with an initial reservoir effluence level


13


at an elevation of S


1


. Additional elevations of the reservoir effluence level for future illustration are marked as S


2


, S


3


and S


4


. For further usage of its effluence, receiving reservoir


10


is equipped with an output valve


11


and an output pipe


12


. Source container


1


is removably held with a source container holder


20


that is linked to a pivot with bearing


25


via a source arm


21


. In a somewhat opposing manner to the source container


1


, balance container


60


containing sealed balance effluence


61


is lockably held with balance container holder


22


that is also linked to the pivot with bearing


25


but via a balance arm


23


. Preferably in the current embodiment, the balance container


60


and its contained effluence


61


can be selected to be respectively the same as source container


1


and its contained source effluence


2


. Likewise, the size and weight of the balance container holder


22


and the balance arm


23


can be selected to be respectively the same as the source container holder


20


and the source arm


21


. However, although the members


20


,


21


,


22


and


23


are made as one rigid body, there is a definite built-in angular asymmetry in that the axis of the balance container


60


lies horizontally while the axis of the source container


1


subtends an angle of θ


1


with the vertical. The reason for this asymmetry will be presently explained. An interference tab


24


located near one edge of the balance container holder


22


is designed to work cooperatively with a notch


41


of a cover plate


40


of the receiving reservoir. A flexible cable


26


, with its one end tied to a bottom corner of the balance container holder


22


, is disposed to pass over a pulley


27


and terminates at the other end with a handle


28


. Thus, as the handle


28


gets manually pulled downwards, the balance container holder


22


will be rotationally lifted upwards around the pivot with bearing


25


through the combined action of the flexible cable


26


and the pulley


27


, and vice versa in the reverse direction. However, as illustrated, the handle


28


is restricted from moving upwards by a catch surface


30


of a fixed catch


29


that is integrated with a frame of the system, not shown here for simplicity. An adjustable damper mechanism


53


, comprising a damper plate


52


that is rotatably tied to a fixed strut


50


through a damper pivot point


51


, is disposed above the initial starting position of the source container


1


as indicated. Furthermore, the position of the strut


50


can be adjusted vertically with respect to a frame of the system. The corresponding functions of the adjustable damper mechanism


53


will be described later.




FIG.-


2


and FIG.-


3


illustrate, via a top view (A—A) of part of the CBETS as shown in FIG.-


1


, the functionality of the above-mentioned integral safety interlock feature that is integrated with the cover plate


40


of the receiving reservoir. With the cover plate


40


located toward the right as shown in FIG.-


2


, the cover plate


40


would either partially or completely cover up, from the top, a reservoir top opening


15


of the receiving reservoir


10


. At the same time, the notch


41


of the cover plate


40


is located to the right of the interference tab


24


of the balance container holder


22


such that a lower edge


44


of the cover plate


40


would block any downward movement of the assembly comprising the balance container


60


and the balance container holder


22


from its initial starting position. This results in, through the structure of the balance arm


23


, the pivot with bearing


25


and the source arm


21


, the prevention of any upward swinging of the assembly comprising the source container


1


and the source container holder


20


from its initial starting position that would otherwise start the out pouring of the source effluence


2


from the source container


1


. After the cover plate


40


is pushed, via the handle


43


and a linkage arm


42


in a direction as indicated by the left-pointing arrow in FIG.-


2


, all the way to the left by an operator to a position as indicated in FIG.-


3


, the cover plate


40


has completely cleared the reservoir top opening


15


of the receiving reservoir


10


for the receiving source effluence


2


from the source container


1


. At the same time, the location of the notch


41


now matches that of the interference tab


24


, which subsequently allows downward movement of the assembly comprising the balance container


60


and the balance container holder


22


from its initial starting position. This permits, through the structure of the balance arm


23


, the pivot with bearing


25


and the source arm


21


, the upward swinging of the assembly comprising the source container


1


and the source container holder


20


from its initial starting position such that the out pouring of the source effluence


2


from the source container


1


into the now fully open reservoir top opening


15


. In other words, this integral safety interlock feature works to prevent any out pouring of the source effluence


2


from the source container


1


until the reservoir top opening


15


of the receiving reservoir


10


is fully exposed for the receiving source effluence


2


.




With the above-described integral safety interlock feature being pushed into the position as indicated in FIG.-


3


, a second side view of the CBETS in its starting state wherein the handle


28


is just moved into its unlatched position to enable the starting of the effluence transferring process is illustrated in FIG.-


4


. The combined weight of the source container


1


, the source effluence


2


, the source container holder


20


and the source arm


21


acts to produce a source torque T


s


urging a clockwise rotation of these members with respect to the pivot with bearing


25


. For simplicity of explanation, the source torque T


s


can be mathematically expressed as follows:






source torque


T




s




=W




s




×SMTA




1


,  (1)






where




W


s


is an equivalent source weight that is simply the combined weight of the source container


1


, the source effluence


2


, the source container holder


20


and the source arm


21


; and




SMTA


1


is a source mechanism torque arm


1


that is the equivalent distance between the pivot with bearing


25


and W


s


as if W


s


were all located at a single point called source mechanism center of gravity


1


, or SMCG


1


.




However, on the other hand, the combined weight of the balance container


60


, the balance effluence


61


, the balance container holder


22


and the balance arm


23


acts to produce a balance torque T


b


urging a counterclockwise rotation of these members with respect the pivot with bearing


25


. Without losing the essential spirit and scope of the present invention, the additional effect on torque from elements like the handle


28


and the flexible cable


26


are neglected as they are much lighter in weight compared to, for example, the weight of the balance effluence


61


. Thus, the balance torque T


b


can similarly be mathematically expressed as follows:






balance torque


T




b




=W




b




×BMTA




1


,  (2)






where




W


b


is an equivalent balance weight that is simply the combined weight of the balance container


60


, the balance effluence


61


, the balance container holder


22


and the balance arm


23


; and




BMTA


1


is a balance mechanism torque arm


1


that is the equivalent distance the pivot with bearing


25


and W


b


as if W


b


were all located at a single point called balance mechanism center of gravity


1


, or BMCG


1


.




A final factor affecting the mechanics of the effluence transferring process is the frictional torque, designated T


f


, coming from areas like the pivot with bearing


25


and the interface between the flexible cable


26


and the pulley


27


. Frictional torque T


f


acts to resist any clockwise or counterclockwise rotation of the system until the availability of a net system torque that exceeds T


f


. That is, to start the counterclockwise rotation of the system to effectuate the effluence transferring process, the following mathematical relationship (3A) must be satisfied:






balance torque


T




b


−source torque


T




s


>frictional torque


T




f


  (3A)






In one embodiment of the current invention, for simplicity of system set up, the balance container


60


with its enclosed balance effluence


61


is selected to be the same as the source container


1


with its enclosed source effluence


2


. Likewise, the balance container holder


22


and the balance arm


23


are also respectively made to be the same size and weight as the source container holder


20


and the source arm


21


. Therefore,








W




b




=W




s


  (4)






However, an angular asymmetry between the balance arm


23


and the source arm


21


is built in the system in that, while the balance arm


23


lies along a horizontal direction, the direction of the source arm


21


is selected to make a subtended angle θ


1


with the vertical resulting in the following relationship:








BMTA




1


>


SMTA




1


  (5)






It follows from the equations (1), (2), (4) and (5) that the balance torque T


b


is larger than the source torque T


s


in such a manner that the magnitude of their difference may be significantly adjustable with the subtended angle θ


1


. In fact, in the present embodiment, the subtended angle θ


1


is selected to be of such a value that the equation (3A) is satisfied. Hence, upon release of the handle


28


from the catch surface


30


of the fixed catch


29


, as shown in FIG.-


4


, the system comprising the source container


1


, the source effluence


2


, the source container holder


20


, the source arm


21


, the balance container


60


, the balance effluence


61


, the balance container holder


22


and the balance arm


23


would immediately start a counterclockwise rotation around the pivot with bearing


25


, resulting in the transfer of the desired effluence from the source container


1


into the receiving reservoir


10


via the reservoir top opening


15


.




It is important to note that, in view of the equations (1) and (2), there are many alternative means whereby the equation (3A) can be implemented to achieve the desired effluence transferring process. For one example, the balance container


60


with the balance effluence


61


can be selected to be larger in size than the source container


1


with the source effluence


2


. For another example, the balance effluence


61


can be made of a material having a higher specific gravity than that of the source effluence


2


. A third example would be the use of a balance arm


23


that is longer than the source arm


21


. A fourth example would be the replacement of the balance container


60


with a calibrated balance weight that will be presently described in FIG.-


9


. A fifth example would be the combination of a portion or all of the above-stated examples of implementation. Nevertheless, the embodiment as exemplified in FIG.-


4


has a unique advantage of being simple and reliable for the handling of a variety sizes of source container and source effluences in that, for each selected combination of the source container size and the type of effluence, the operator only requires to place another identical container within the balance container holder


22


for the set-up.




Continuing the effluence transferring process, FIG.-


5


illustrates a third side view of the present CBETS where the source effluence


2


of the source container


1


has been partially transferred into the receiving reservoir


10


. Notice that, as the mechanical system has rotated into a second orientation θ


2


, the two torque arms BMTA


2


and SMTA


2


become more or less equal. However, due to loss of the source effluence


2


, the new equivalent source weight W


s2


has significantly reduced from its starting value W


s


. Or equivalently,








W




s2




<<W




b


  (6)






Thus, the relationship (3A) is again satisfied insuring the continuing counterclockwise rotation of the mechanical system till the completion of the effluence transfer process. In fact, in light of the relationship (6), the relationship (3A) should now be rewritten as:






balance torque


T




b


−source torque


T




s


>>frictional torque


T




f


  (3B)






This means that, due to the emptying of the source effluence


2


from the source container


1


, the continuing counterclockwise rotation of the mechanical system could accelerate to an excessive degree causing undesirable shock, noise and vibration toward the end of the effluence transfer process. To counteract this effect, the aforementioned adjustable damper mechanism


53


is employed. Notice that, toward the beginning of the effluence transfer process as shown in FIG.-


4


, the source container


1


and the source container holder


20


have not touched the damper plate


52


and the adjustable damper mechanism


53


performed no function. However, as illustrated in FIG.-


5


, the adjustable damper mechanism


53


begins to perform a function when the source container holder


20


swings into contact with the damper plate


52


. While it is rotatable with respect to the fixed strut


50


, the weight of the damper plate


52


does provide a counteracting damping torque to the mechanical system as it continues to rotate to its final position of θ


3


in FIG.-


6


where the source effluence


2


has been completely emptied into the receiving reservoir


10


with a final reservoir effluence level


13


at an elevation of S


2


. Notice that, through the combined action of the flexible cable


26


and the pulley


27


, the handle


28


is now moved to a high point by the mechanical system.




To return the CBETS to its initial state, an operator of the system would manually pull the handle


28


all the way down and latch it against the catch surface


30


the fixed catch


29


, these steps are respectively illustrated in FIG.-


7


and FIG.-


8


. Of course, at this time, the emptied source container


1


can be replaced with another one and the whole effluence transfer process repeated again.




FIG.-


9


illustrates a side view of an aforementioned embodiment of the CBETS wherein the balance container


60


with the balance effluence


61


is replaced with a balance weight


70


. To maintain similar functionality as the system depicted in FIG.-


1


, the weight of the balance weight


70


can simply be made the same as the combined weight of the balance container


60


and the balance effluence


61


.




FIG.-


10


illustrates a side view of yet another embodiment of the CBETS wherein the adjustable damper mechanism


53


is moved to a higher position compared to that illustrated in FIG.-


5


.While both of the mechanical systems as illustrated in FIG.-


5


and FIG.-


10


have rotated into the same second angular position θ


2


, the source container holder


20


in FIG.-


5


just swings into contact with the damper plate


52


while the source container holder


20


in FIG.-


10


has yet to touch the damper plate


52


. This means that the damping action of the CBETS in FIG.-


10


will set in at a later stage of the effluence transfer process than the CBETS in FIG.-


5


. In other words, the CBETS in FIG.-


10


will produce a lesser degree of damping than the CBETS in FIG.-


5


.




As described, a specific set of embodiments of a counter balanced effluence transfer system, or CBETS, and associated methods of operation have been described for the semi-automatic transferring of effluence from a source container into a receiving reservoir. The invention has been described using exemplary preferred embodiments. However, for those skilled in this field, the preferred embodiments can be easily adapted and modified to suit additional applications without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Thus, it is to be understood that the scope of the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover various modifications and similar arrangements based upon the same operating principle. The scope of the claims, therefore, should be accorded the broadest interpretations so as to encompass all such modifications and similar arrangements.



Claims
  • 1. A counter balanced effluence transfer system for safe and semi-automatic transferring of effluence from a source container into a receiving reservoir comprising:a receiving reservoir comprising a cover plate and a reservoir top opening for receiving an effluence; a counter balanced mechanism, or CBM, fixedly located above the receiving reservoir to provide for an inherent frictional torque, designated as Tf, resisting any rotation of the CBM wherein the CBM further comprising; a pivot point with bearing; a source-side member having a source arm and a source container holder rotatably attached to a first side of said pivot point with bearing to hold a replaceable source container having a desirable amount of source effluence enclosed wherein a gravitational source torque Ts around the pivot point with bearing is produced by the source-side member; and a balance-side member having a balance arm and a balance container holder rotatably attached to a second side of said pivot point with bearing to hold a balance container having a desirable amount of balance effluence enclosed wherein a gravitational balance torque Tb around the pivot point with bearing is produced by the balance-side member; whereby the two torques Ts and Tb oppose each other and are unequal to create a resulting difference torque, ΔT, defined as |Ts−Tb|, which is larger than Tf such that, in the absence of any additional externally applied force or torque, the resulting initial direction of rotation of the CBM will start and dynamically maintain an effluence transfer process whereby the source effluence enclosed in said source container will be completely poured into said receiving reservoir.
  • 2. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 1 further comprises an adjustable damping assembly which consists of a movable damping element being disposed near an initial position of the CBM at the beginning of the effluence transfer process such that the CBM will contact the movable damping element whereby subsequent motion of the CBM will be damped for the suppression of undesirable shock, noise and vibration toward the end of the effluence transfer process.
  • 3. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 2 wherein the movable damping element is a damper plate being located rotatably near the source container.
  • 4. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 1 further comprises a motion-prevention means which is attached to the CBM to prevent undesirable movement of the CBM before the start of the effluence transfer process.
  • 5. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 4 wherein the motion-prevention means further comprises a handle and a fixed catch such that the effluence transfer process can only be started with a movement of the CBM following the release of the handle from the fixed catch.
  • 6. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 4 wherein the motion prevention means further comprises a pulley with a coupled flexible cable to coordinate the movement of the CBM and the handle.
  • 7. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 1 further comprises a safety interlock means such that, unless the receiving reservoir cover plate is pushed to completely expose the reservoir top opening, the safety interlock means will block the CBM from any movement thus preventing the start up of the effluence transfer process.
  • 8. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 7 wherein the safety interlock means further comprises a notch which is integrated with the receiving reservoir cover plate and an interference tab being integrated with the CBM.
  • 9. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 8 wherein the safety interlock means further comprises an interference tab which is integrated with the CBM.
  • 10. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 1 wherein the source-side member further comprises a source container and a source effluence.
  • 11. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 10 wherein the balance-side member further comprises a balance container and a balance effluence.
  • 12. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 11 wherein the total weight of balance-side member is made unequal to the total weight of the source-side.
  • 13. The counter balanced effluence transfer system as stated in claim 1 wherein a subtended angle between the axis of the source arm and vertical direction is made unequal to a subtended angle between the axis of the balance arm and vertical direction.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a formal application of a provisional application filed on Dec. 4, 2000, Ser. No. 60/250,667.

US Referenced Citations (19)
Number Name Date Kind
1509597 Heltzel Sep 1924 A
1527962 Lamb Feb 1925 A
2133474 Roscoe Oct 1938 A
2339396 Harvey Jan 1944 A
3334884 Suzuki et al. Aug 1967 A
3350083 Buhrer et al. Oct 1967 A
3372714 Schmidt Mar 1968 A
3900134 Larson Aug 1975 A
4558421 Shriver Dec 1985 A
4568239 Sims Feb 1986 A
4585148 Ito Apr 1986 A
4632009 Dann Dec 1986 A
4940335 Gibson Jul 1990 A
5275662 Wendler et al. Jan 1994 A
5586692 Livengood Dec 1996 A
6053218 Boers Apr 2000 A
6213352 Boyer, Jr. Apr 2001 B1
6357988 Bayne Mar 2002 B1
6379034 Schutz Apr 2002 B1
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/250667 Dec 2000 US