The present invention relates to counter-pleated membrane plate exchangers and cross-pleated membrane spacers. More particularly the invention relates to exchangers in which the membrane and membrane spacer is folded, layered, and sealed in a particular manner. The invention includes a method for manufacturing such counter-flow membrane plate exchangers. In addition, it relates to a sinusoidal pattern netting separator material that is formed in a particular manner. The exchangers are useful in heat and water vapor exchangers and in other applications.
Heat and water vapor exchangers (also sometimes referred to as humidifiers, enthalpy exchangers, or energy recovery wheels) have been developed for a variety of applications, including building ventilation (HVAC), medical and respiratory applications, gas drying or separation, automobile ventilation, airplane ventilation, and for the humidification of fuel cell reactants for electrical power generation. When constructing various devices intended for the exchange of heat and/or water vapor between two airstreams, it is desirable to have a thin, inexpensive material which removes moisture from one of the air streams and transfers that moisture to the other air stream. In some devices, it is also desirable that heat, as well as moisture be transferred across the thickness of material such that the heat and water vapor are transferred from one stream to the other while the air and contaminants within the air are not permitted to migrate.
Planar plate-type heat and water vapor exchangers use membrane plates that are constructed using discrete pieces of a planar, water-permeable membrane (for example, Nafion®, natural cellulose, sulfonated polymers or other synthetic or natural membranes) supported by a separator material (integrated into the membrane or, alternatively, remains independent) and/or frame. The membrane plates are typically stacked, sealed, and configured to accommodate fluid streams flowing in either cross-flow or counter-flow configurations between alternate plate pairs, so that heat and water vapor is transferred via the membrane, while limiting the cross-over or cross-contamination of the fluid streams.
One well known design for constructing heat exchangers employs a rotating wheel made of an open honeycomb structure. The open passages of the honeycomb are oriented parallel with the axis of the wheel and the wheel is rotated continuously on its axis. When this concept is applied to heat exchange for building ventilation, outside air is directed to pass through one section of the wheel while inside air is directed to pass in the opposite direction through another portion of the wheel. An energy recovery wheel typically exhibits high heat and moisture transfer efficiencies, but has undesirable characteristics including a fast rotating mass inertia (1-3 seconds per revolution), a high cross-contamination rate, high pollutant and odor carryover, a higher outdoor air correction factor than is ideal, a need for an electrical energy supply to power geared drive motors, and a need for frequent maintenance of belts and pulleys. Energy recovery wheel transfer efficiency correlates to the rotational speed of the device; spinning the wheel faster typically increases the energy transfer rate. However, any efficiency gained in this manner is offset by more negative effect of the undesirable characteristics here noted. Thus there is a need for a device that exhibits an energy transfer efficiency at least as great as an energy recovery wheel while minimizing these undesirable characteristics, especially the cross-contamination.
An energy recovery wheel processes large volumes of airflow in a relatively low volume footprint. By contrast, the size of a typical cross-flow and counter-flow plate-type exchanger design increases exponentially as the volume of processed airflow. As a plate-type exchanger increases in size, pressure drop across the exchanger also increases. Plate spacing on large plate-type exchangers is generally increased to mitigate pressure drop. The increase in plate spacing typically increases the overall volume of the exchanger relative to its design airflow. A further disadvantage is the incompatibility of existing plate-type exchangers to fit into existing air handling units designed to accommodate the relatively thin depth profiles of energy recovery wheels prohibiting retrofit replacement of a wheel by a typical plate-type exchanger.
Energy recovery wheels are typically customized for different end-use applications. The need for customization increases the end-use cost of the exchangers, material waste during manufacturing, design time, failure-testing costs, and a number of performance verification certifications. Energy recovery wheels require a wide variety of structural support sizes, lengths, and quantities and often competing design tradeoffs including number of segments, -wheel depths, motor sizes, belt lengths, and wheel speeds. In some HVAC systems, use of an energy recovery wheel may be prohibited due to the inherent risk of failure of the motor, belts, and seals.
Likewise, plate-type energy exchangers are typically customized for different end-use applications. The number and dimensions of cores are dictated by the end-use application. Manufacturing of plate-type exchangers requires the use of custom machinery, custom molds and various raw material sizes. Plate-type energy exchanger designs utilize a large number of joints and edges that need to be sealed; consequently, the manufacturing of such devices can be labor intensive as well as expensive. The durability of plate-type energy exchangers can be limited, with potential delaminating of the membrane from the frame and failure of the seals, resulting in leaks, poor performance, and cross-over contamination (leakage between streams).
In some heat and water vapor exchanger designs, the many separate membrane plates are replaced by a single membrane core made by folding a continuous strip of membrane in a concertina, zig-zag or accordion fashion, with a series of parallel alternating folds. Similarly, for heat exchangers, a continuous strip of material can be patterned with fold lines and folded along such lines to arrive at a configuration appropriate for heat exchange. By folding the membrane in this way, the number of edges that must be bonded can be greatly reduced. For example, instead of having to bond two edges per layer, it may be necessary only to bond one edge per layer because the other edge is a folded edge. However, the flow configurations that are achievable with concertina-style pleated membrane cores are limited, and there is still typically a need for substantial edge sealing, such as potting edges in a resin material. Another disadvantage is the higher pressure drop as a result of the often smaller size of the entrance and exit areas to the pleated core.
Existing cross-flow cores have theoretical efficiency limitations of approximately 80%, while the efficiency of a counter-flow core can theoretically reach 100%. Some current counter-flow plate type arrangements have achieved heat transfer efficiencies equal to or greater than energy recovery wheels, but incur the penalties of a much greater volume, higher pressure drop, and higher cost when compared to a recovery wheel. A broad array of shapes have been proposed in the prior art, including long rectangles, hexagonal profiles, and back-to-back cross flow designs. The existing counter-flow plate designs utilize a greater amount of material than their related cross-flow plate exchanger counterparts. In addition, current counter-flow plate designs generally transfer thermal energy only. Counter-flow heat and moisture plate-type exchangers have been expensive to produce due to inherent difficulty of the plate separation techniques, plate sealing, and inefficient use of materials.
While an energy recovery wheel transfers heat and moisture at nearly equal efficiencies, the existing membrane-type plate-exchangers have substantially reduced moisture transfer rates in comparison to thermal energy transfer. Attempts to increase vapor transmission have employed very expensive and specialized polymeric membranes, and have not seen wide spread practical use. This is partially due to spacer materials and membrane seam bonding that are impermeable to water vapor, effectively reducing the available surface area for water transport. In addition, specialized polymeric membranes transfer water vapor substantially in only one direction, perpendicular to the planar surface. Thus, spacing techniques blocking the effective surface area of one side of the membrane inherently inhibits the vapor transmission on the opposite side of the membrane.
It is, therefore, numbered among the objects of the present invention is to provide an improved counter-flow exchanger whose membranes are folded from continuous sheets (or rolls).
Another object of this invention is to provide an improved counter-flow exchanger whose separator material is formed from continuous corrugated netting sheets (or rolls).
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved method of constructing counter-flow exchangers whose membranes and separator materials are formed from continuous sheets.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved bond between membranes utilizing thermal sealing techniques that produce a highly vapor permeable joint.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved counter-flow exchanger that is resistant to all forms of corrosion.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved separator material that allows airflow to pass bidirectionally without obstruction, thereby minimizing pressure drop and allowing for a broader array of geometric configurations.
A further object of this invention is to provide an improved counter-flow exchanger without the need for any potting resin.
A further object of this invention is to provide a modular/stackable counter-flow exchanger which can be readily incorporated and scaled into a larger wall and thus accommodate higher quantities of airflow.
A further object of this invention is to provide an exchanger with a smaller depth profile.
A further object of this invention is to provide an exchanger that is lighter weight and utilizes less material, thus reducing overall manufacturing costs.
The present approach provides a uniquely counter-pleated core that provides a stack or layered array of openings or fluid passageways, and that utilizes membrane folds for edge sealing. In preferred embodiments, the counter-pleated membrane core is manufactured using at least two strips of membrane. Each membrane strip undergoes a repeated folding process, incorporating also steps to join the two or more strips of membrane to form a layer and further joining the edges of layers to form seals. The resultant passageways are configured in alternating counter-flow arrangement.
In particular, a method for making a counter-pleated core having a plurality of membrane layers comprises positioning at least two membrane strips, extending in substantially opposite directions edge-to-edge, generally in the same plane. The strips are positioned so that a portion of one edge of one of the membrane strips is adjacent and substantially parallel to a portion of one edge of the other membrane strip. The adjacent edge portions of at least two membrane strips are joined, forming a first seam with additional membrane seams by joining adjacent edge portions of additional membrane strips. Each membrane strip is then reverse folded 180° in each of the at least two membrane strips to overlie the first membrane layer. A second membrane seam is formed by joining the first edge portion of first membrane strip to the adjacent second edge portion of second membrane strip of at least two membrane strips. Additional membrane seams are formed by joining adjacent edge portions of additional adjacent membrane strips to form a second membrane layer overlying the first membrane layer. The second membrane layer is parallel to and spaced from first membrane layer. The joining and folding steps are repeated to form a counter-pleated core with a stack or layered array of passageways between the membrane layers. The resultant counter-pleated cartridge can be formed from two or more continuous membrane strips and the number of folds can be varied to give cores with the desired number of layers.
In embodiments of the present method, adjacent portions of the membrane strips can be positioned so that they abut one another, or so that they slightly overlap, along the seams. They can be joined by various methods including: applying impulse style thermal bonding, or applying adhesive tape, or welding the edges of the membrane together along the seams.
A method for making a counter-pleated core further comprises potting the non-folded membrane layer edges with a sealant material.
A preferred method for making a counter-pleated core can further comprise steps in which the counter-pleated exchanger has two non-folded edges and a first and second adjacent membrane layer. In this configuration, one non-folded edge is sealed to a first adjacent membrane edge while the second non-folded edge is sealed to a first adjacent membrane edge while the second non-folded edge is sealed to a second adjacent membrane edge. The above mentioned embodiment can be achieved during the folding of counter-pleated core or after the folding of counter-pleated core is achieved.
Each of the membrane layers in the counter-pleated core will have a number of intersections between folded edges of membrane strips (the number of the intersections will depend upon the number of membrane strips used in the construction). A method for making a counter-pleated core can further comprise applying a sealant material at the intersecting folded edges of the membrane layers. For example, the sealing step can comprise potting the layered fold intersections (edges that are perpendicular to the membrane layers) of the core with a sealant material.
A method for making a counter-pleated core can further comprise inserting a separator between at least some of the plurality of membrane layers. Separators can be inserted either during the counter-pleating process, or into passageways of the core once the core is formed. In some embodiments the separator is used to define a plurality of discrete fluid flow channels within the passageway, for example, to enhance the flow of fluid streams across opposing surfaces of the membrane. Separators can also be used to provide support to the membrane, and/or to provide more uniform spacing of the layers.
The separators can be of various types, including corrugated, biaxially oriented netting of thermoplastic material whose sinusoidal shape defines a plurality of discrete fluid flow channels within the heat and water vapor exchanger. Biaxial orientation “stretches” extruded square mesh in one or both directions under controlled conditions to produce strong, flexible, light weight netting. Netting material is furthermore placed into a sinusoidal pattern through corrugating process. The membrane separator can further be selected from a group consisting of polypropylene and other thermoplastics having mesh sheet weight of less than 3 lbs/1000 ft2 and preferably less than 1.5 lbs/1000 ft2. Other potential types of separators for counter-pleated core include corrugated sheet materials, mesh materials, and molded plastic inserts.
A preferred method for making a counter-pleated core can further comprise inserting a continuous strip of separator material between at least some of the plurality of membrane layers during the counter-pleating membrane process. A continuous strip of separator material is cross-pleated, running-parallel to the counter-pleated folds forming 90° angle to membrane strip seams.
The present invention encompasses counter-pleated membrane cores that are obtained or are obtainable using embodiments of the methods described herein.
Counter-pleated membrane cores comprise multiple layers of folded membrane that define a stack or layered array of fluid passageways. Each layer comprises a portion of at least two strips of membrane joined edge-to-edge to form at least one seam. The seams in adjacent membrane layers of the core are oriented parallel to one another.
Counter-pleated membrane cores can be used in a variety of applications, including heat and water vapor exchangers. The cores are particularly suitable for use as cores in energy recovery ventilators (ERV) applications. They can also be used in heat and/or moisture applications, air filter applications, gas dryer applications, flue gas energy recovery applications, sequestering applications, gas/liquid separator applications, automobile outside air treatment applications, airplane outside air treatment applications, and fuel cell applications. Whatever the application, the core is typically disposed within some kind of housing.
An embodiment of a heat and water vapor exchanger, for transferring heat and vapor between a first fluid stream and a second fluid stream, the exchanger comprising: a housing with a first surface containing a first plurality of inlet ports and outlet ports, and a substantially parallel opposing second surface containing a second plurality of inlet ports and outlet ports. The first inlet ports on first surface are directly opposite second inlet ports on second surface and first outlet ports on first surface are directly opposite second outlet ports on second surface. A counter-pleated core is generally enclosed within a housing. The core comprises multiple layers of folded, water-permeable membrane material defining a stack of alternating first and second fluid passageways, wherein each layer comprises a portion of at least two strips of said water-permeable membrane material joined by one seam for a first pair of two strips and one additional seam for each additional strip. The seams joining membrane strips are subsequently internal within counter-pleated core and substantially parallel to a direction of general airflow movement. The folds of water-permeable membranes define inlet and outlet ports on first and second faces of counter-pleated core and being substantially perpendicular to seam(s). All first inlets on first face fluidly connect to all second outlets on second face and wherein all second inlets on the second face fluidly connect to all first outlets on the first face. Exchangers utilizing counter-pleated membranes and cross-pleated separators of the type described herein have enhanced sealing characteristics and reduced construction time. ERV cores comprising counter-pleated cores of this type described herein have given superior results in pressurized crossover leakage relative to conventional planar plate-type core designs. ERV cores comprising counter-pleated cores of this type described herein have given superior results in moisture transfer relative to conventional planar plate-type core designs.
Exchangers utilizing counter-pleated membranes and cross-pleated spacers of the type described herein have improved heat and/or moisture transfer efficiencies.
Exchangers utilizing counter-pleated membranes and cross-pleated spacers of the type described herein have reduced material costs and reduced construction time.
Exchangers utilizing counter-flow exchanger and related manifolding described herein utilize less depth, less volume, and are overall more compact to fit into existing HVAC equipment.
Exchangers utilizing this folding configuration are advantageous in that they reduce the number of edges that have to be sealed, especially relative to counter-flow plate-type heat and water vapor exchangers where individual pieces of membrane are stacked and have to be sealed along four edges.
Various other features, advantages, and characteristics will become apparent following a reading of the following detailed description.
The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, together with further objects and advantages thereof may be better understood in reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Slits 260b and 260a of length Z are formed along the end of membrane strip 210a and end of membrane strip 230a, respectively. In the next step, shown completed in
For the last layer of the core, the end of each membrane strip 210a, 220a, and 230a is trimmed at 90° to form the top surface of the core. The resulting counter-pleated core has layered alternating openings or passageways with a plurality of inlet ports and outlet ports on only two out of six faces of the core, thereby creating counter-flow or parallel airflow passageways.
Such cores can be manufactured in a wide variety of sizes and number of membrane strips. The height of the finished core will depend on the number of folded layers, as well as the thickness of the membrane and separator (if any) in each layer. A continuous folding operation could also be envisioned with core size selected and generally cut to any size specification.
Various methods can be used to join the two or more strips of membrane along the in-plane seams (for example, 251b and 251a in
In preferred embodiments, a counter-pleated core is provided with seals along corners of each fold produced by the counter-pleating process. In one approach these seals are formed with thermally activated glue, caulk, “potting” materials, or foam to form a seal between adjacent folded corners comprising each layer. The sealant will close off the holes created at the intersection between corners of each fold produced by the counter-pleating process, and select folds can also provide attachment to a framework by which the core is held together. The seals can be formed using a suitable material, for example a low smoke hot-melt adhesive specifically formulated for air filter applications, or a two-part rubber epoxy material can be used.
In preferred embodiments, a counter-pleated core is also provided with seals along the start of membrane strips (for example, 125 and 126 in
Counter-pleated cores of the type described herein can further comprise separators positioned between the membrane layers, for example, to assist with fluid flow distribution and/or to help maintain separation of the layers. For example, corrugated netting of thermoplastic material, corrugated aluminum inserts, plastic molded inserts, or mesh inserts can be disposed in some of all the passageways between adjacent membrane layers. Separators may be inserted between the membrane layers after the core is formed or may be inserted during the counter-pleating process, for example between the steps shown in
The above defined separator can be used in all current heat and moisture exchanger designs known in the prior art. Biaxial oriented mesh has superior performance over prior art heat and water vapor separator materials and techniques. The mesh apertures (hole size) presents more membrane surface area to the air stream and facilitates faster water vapor transfer over corrugated sheet materials such as foils, plastics, or paper. In addition, water vapor within an air stream will, on average, travel a shorter distance to interact with membrane than with sheet materials. Furthermore, biaxial oriented mesh facilitates fluid movement in both the X and Y plane directions where airflow entering corrugated sheet material travels only in a straight line path. Bi-directional airflow allows for a broader range of geometric shapes within the context of heat and moisture exchangers. Corrugated mesh utilizes less material than corrugated sheets, achieving both cost reduction as well as better performance in smoke/fire testing. Thermoplastic material is resistant to most forms of corrosion allowing for operation in air streams containing corrosive chemicals. Thermoplastic material is generally known to be compatible with most forms of heat and vapor membrane materials.
Membrane material used in counter-pleated cores of the type described herein can be selected to have suitable properties for the particular end-use application. Preferably the membrane is pliable or flexible mechanically such that it can be folded as described herein without splitting. Preferably the membrane will also form and hold a crease when it is folded, rather than tending to unfold and open up again. It is also advantageous that the membrane be of a washable variety so that cores can be completely submerged in cleaning solution. An additional property that is advantageous is the ability to thermally bond membranes using impulse style heating elements.
For energy recovery ventilators or other heat and water vapor exchanger applications, the membrane is water-permeable. In addition, more conventional water-permeable, porous membranes with a thin film coating, that substantially blocks gas flow across the membrane but allows water vapor exchange, can be used. Also porous membranes that contain one or more hydrophilic additives or coatings can be used. Porous membranes with hydrophilic additives or coatings can be used. Porous membranes with hydrophilic additives or coatings have desirable properties for use in heat and water vapor exchangers, and in particular for use in heat and water vapor exchangers with a counter-pleated membrane core. Preferably, membranes have favorable heat and water vapor transfer properties, are inexpensive, mechanically strong, dimensionally stable, easy to pleat, are bondable to gasket materials such as polyurethane, are resistant to cold climate conditions, and have low permeability to gas cross-over when wet or dry. The membrane should be unaffected by exposure to high levels of condensation (high saturation) and under freeze-thaw conditions.
Asymmetric membranes that have different properties on each surface can be used. If the two asymmetric membrane strips are oriented the same way in the manufacturing process, one set of passageways in the finished counter-pleated core will have different properties than the alternating set of passageways. For example, the membrane strips could be coated or laminated on one side so that the passageways for just one of the two fluid streams are lined by the coating or laminate.
External profiles or features can be added to or incorporated into the membrane to enhance fluid distribution between the layers and/or to help maintain separation of the layers. Ribs or other protrusions or features can be molded, embossed or otherwise formed integrally with the membrane material, or can be added to the membrane afterwards, for example by a deposition or lamination process. Such membranes can be used in counter-pleated cores of the type described herein with or without the use of additional separators.
Counter-pleated cores of the type described herein can comprise more than one type of membrane. For example, in some embodiments, instead of using two strips or reels of membrane that are essentially the same, two different types of membrane can be used. This will result in a counter-pleated core where each layer comprises two different membrane types.
Counter-pleated cores of the type described herein can also be formed so that a portion of the core is devoted to heat transfer only while the remaining portion is devoted to both heat and moisture transfer. This arrangement is advantageous in extremely cold climates where the sensible portion of the plate provides a “pre-heating” effect to the incoming fresh air stream and thus reduces possibility of sub-freezing condensation conditions. A “hybrid” counter-pleated core can be manufactured by partially dipping a portion of the core into a solution that will block the porous nature of respective membrane.
A counter-pleating process of the type described in references to
As can be seen from
The present counter-pleated membrane core can be used in various types of heat and water vapor exchangers. For example, as mentioned above, the present counter-pleated membrane cores can be used in energy recovery ventilators for transferring heat and water vapor between air streams entering and exiting a building. This is accomplished by flowing the streams on opposite sides of the counter-pleated membrane core. The membrane allows the heat and moisture to transfer from one stream to the other while substantially preventing the air streams from mixing or crossing over.
Other potential applications for the counter-pleated cores of the type described herein include, but are not limited to:
1) Fuel cell humidifiers where the counter-pleated cores comprises a water-permeable membrane material. For this application the humidifier is configured to effect heat and water vapor transfer from and/to a fuel cell reactant or product stream. For example, it can be used to recycle the heat and water vapor from the exhaust stream of an operating fuel cell transferring latent and sensible energy from one stream to another.
2) Remote energy recovery where an exhaust air stream is located remotely and distinctly from a supply air stream. For this application, two or more independent, counter-pleated cores separated by a distance would be joined by a pumped run-around piping system. One of two distinct air passages per core would be replaced with a liquid, affecting an air-to-liquid-to-air transfer. Heat and water vapor would be transferred through pumped liquid to remote and distinctly separate core(s). A multitude of different counter-flow cores are envisioned connecting a multitude of distinctly separator supply and exhaust air streams.
3) Flue gas recapture or filter devices. Flue gas is an exhaust gas that exits to the atmosphere via a flue from a fireplace, oven, furnace, direct-fire burner, boiler, steam generator, power plant, or other such source. Quite often, it refers to the combustion exhaust gas produced at power plants. A counter-pleated core can be used to recapture or filter flue gases, water vapor and heat, with a high quality seal thereby limiting toxic gas leakage. Advantages of such configuration would eliminate liquid condensation and produce clean, heated, and humidified supply air to an application.
4) Sequestering (carbon). A counter-pleated core can comprise a layer of sequestering material, for example, in alternate membrane layers to transfer, absorb, or trap heat, water vapor, materials, or contaminants.
5) Dryers where a counter-pleated core is used in drying of gases by transfer of water from one stream to another through a water-permeable membrane.
6) Gas/liquid separators where the counter-pleated core comprises a membrane material that promotes the selective transfer of particular gases or liquids.
7) Gas filtering, where the counter-pleated core comprises a membrane material that promotes the selective transfer of particular gas, and can be used to separate that gas from other components.
Other membrane materials (thin sheets or films) besides selectively permeable membrane materials could be pleated to form cores, using the counter-pleating technique described herein, for a variety of different applications. For example, pliable metal or foil sheets could be used for heat exchangers, and porous sheet materials could be used for other applications such as filters. In addition, a hybrid sheet where one part is heat transfer only and one part where moisture transfer is allowed is also envisioned.
The preferred orientation of the core will depend upon the particular end-use application. For example, in many applications an orientation with vertically oriented passageways may be preferred (for example, to facilitate drainage); in other applications it may be desirable to have the passageways layered in a vertical stack; or functionally it may not matter how the core is oriented. More than one core can be used in series or in parallel, and multiple cores can otherwise enclosed in a single housing, stacked or side-by-side. Manifolds of various sizes and made out of various materials can be added to facilitate a number of flow configurations.
While particular elements, embodiments, and applications of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood that the invention is not limited thereto since modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims, particularly in light of the foregoing teachings.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3347007 | Hale | Oct 1967 | A |
4460388 | Fukami et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
6068771 | McDermott et al. | May 2000 | A |
6644535 | Wallach et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684943 | Dobbs et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
8157891 | Montie et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8486178 | Montie et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20070185222 | Shelton | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080085437 | Dean et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20130248160 | Eplee | Sep 2013 | A1 |