The present invention relates generally to munitions.
In anticipation of an amphibious military attack along a particular stretch of beach, defenders might deploy anti land-craft mines and anti-tank mines along the beach zone. The assault force will typically seek to defeat the mines via a counter-mine system before landing on the beach.
According to one proposed counter-mine system, hundreds of thousands of small caliber (e.g., 50 caliber, etc.) “darts” that contain high explosive (“HE”) material are rained-down upon the mine-laden beach zone. The darts are delivered via missile(s) from military aircraft. In one design, upon impact with a mine casing or lid, a brief delay timer within the dart is initiated. The delay provides time (e.g., 500 microseconds, etc.) for the dart to penetrate the lid and reach the mine's explosive (e.g., TNT, etc.) payload. After this brief delay and with the dart's HE material within the mine's payload, the dart's HE material is detonated, thereby neutralizing the mine.
If a dart does not impact a mine, its timer will not be initiated. If this occurs, the dart will simply come to rest, unexploded, a few feet into the sand or soil of the beach zone. As a function of the mine-field density, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of unexploded darts might litter the beach zone.
Unexploded darts pose an extreme risk to civilians, in particular children. A curious child tampering with an unexploded dart might inadvertently trigger its HE payload with dire consequences. Furthermore, HE material recovered from unexploded darts by enemy combatants could be used to create improvised explosive devices that could be used, in turn, against the assault force.
The present invention provides a way to ensure that an explosive projectile detonates regardless of whether or not it contacts its target.
The illustrative embodiment of the invention is a “dart” (small projectile) that contains an HE payload, two time-delay fuses, one providing a relatively longer delay (e.g., one second, etc.) and the other providing a relatively shorter delay (e.g., 500 microseconds, etc.), and a first and a second triggering mechanism for triggering the fuses. The first triggering mechanism, which triggers on contact with a mine lid, triggers the relatively shorter time-delay fuse. The second mechanism, which triggers upon an overburdening exposure to water, sand, or soil, triggers the relatively longer time-delay fuse.
Consider mines that have been deployed in a beach zone. These mines will typically be located just off the beach in shallow water or on the beach buried in the sand. A dart on its way to these mines will first encounter water, sand or soil, which will trigger the second triggering mechanism and initiate the relatively longer delay train.
Assuming that the dart does impact a mine, the first triggering mechanism will trigger on the impact with the mine's lid and initiate the shorter delay train. In most such instances, the predetermined delay provided by the longer delay train will not have a chance to expire. Rather, the shorter delay initiated on contact with the mine line will expire first. Of course, in either case, the dart will detonate, thereby neutralizing the mine.
But consider what happens if the dart does not impact a mine. As previously mentioned, the longer delay train will have been initiated since the dart will necessarily experience an overburdening encounter with water, sand, or soil. As a consequence, even if the dart does not impact a mine lid, it will nevertheless explode. In this fashion, the second triggering mechanism serves as a “fail-safe” measure to ensure that all darts that are deployed will explode, regardless of whether or not they impact a mine.
Outer nose 102 contains most of standoff pin 108, triggers 110 and 112. The outer nose also contains other elements that are involved in the detonation of the projectile's explosive payload. These other elements are described later in this specification in conjunction with
Tail 104 is aft of outer nose 102. The tail contains the bulk of the explosive payload of projectile 100. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, the explosive payload is a high explosive, such as PBXN-5. Other high-explosive materials may suitably be used. In some embodiments for use in other applications, conventional explosives (i.e., as opposed to high-explosives) can be used as the payload.
Fins 106 depend from the tail 104. The fins stabilize the projectile as it moves (i.e., falls) through water or air.
A portion of standoff pin 108 extends forward of outer nose 102. In some embodiments, the standoff pin has a blunt nose to aid in creating supercavitating movement through water, which improves water penetration distance and trajectory accuracy. Standoff pin 108 also functions as a support for cylindrical, sleeve-like triggers 110 and 112.
Furthermore, since it creates the cavity through which projectile 100 runs, standoff pin 108 plays a role in “shielding” mine trigger 110 from water and sand impingement. Note that at sufficient speeds, as the projectile moves through sand, standoff pin 108 creates a terradynamic cavity, such that neither the triggers nor the surface of projectile 100 (other than the blunt nose of the projectile) actually contact the sand.
The only external portion of mine trigger 110 is a “lip,” which contacts the mine lid on impact. Mine trigger 110 triggers a briefly delayed detonation of the projectile's high-explosive payload when the trigger impacts a mine lid. The reason for the brief time delay is to allow the projectile time to penetrate the mine's lid and enter its explosive payload. Detonation of the high-explosive payload of the projectile when in the presence of the mine's payload will neutralize the mine.
UXO trigger 112 triggers a briefly delayed detonation of the projectile's high-explosive payload when the trigger experiences “overburdening” exposure to water, sand, or soil overburden. As used herein, the term “overburdening” means exposure or contact that actuates (i.e., triggers) a trigger (e.g., UXO trigger 112, etc.) by imparting a force to the trigger that is in excess of the trigger's actuation threshold. The time delay initiated by UXO trigger 112 is somewhat longer than the time delay initiated by mine trigger 110. The only external portion of UXO trigger 112 is a “lip,” somewhat larger than the lip of the mine trigger.
In the illustrative embodiment, UXO trigger 112 and mine trigger 110 are co-axially arranged with respect to one another, with the smaller diameter mine trigger being disposed radially inward of the UXO trigger.
As depicted in
In some embodiments, the time delay provided by the relatively longer time-delay fuse is about one second and the time delay provided by the relatively shorter time-delay fuse is about 500 microseconds. At the speed that projectile 100 is typically moving, and given a likely distance of a few feet between the triggering of UXO trigger 112 and the triggering of mine trigger 110, the shorter time-delay will likely expire first. Of course, one or the other of the time delay fuses will ultimately detonate projectile 100 and, presumably, mine 200.
Both the UXO trigger 112 and the mine trigger 110 have “cut-out” regions that are proximal to respective firing pins 622 and 618. These openings enable the two triggers to operate independently of one another while being substantially nested, as depicted in
Shear pins 514 prevent mine trigger 110 and UXO trigger 112 from moving until triggered. When sufficient (i.e., “overburdening”) force is applied to the “lips” of these triggers, such as caused by high velocity impact with a mine lid (mine trigger 110) or the high drag forces generated by rapid movement through water (UXO trigger 112), shear pins 514 are sheared. In some embodiments, the shear pins used for both triggers are the same. In such embodiments, the difference in response of the triggers (i.e., the amount of force that will cause a trigger to trigger) can be effected by differences in the frontal surface area of the triggers, differences in the diameter of the triggers, etc. Alternatively, or in conjunction with differences in the lips of the triggers, the shear pins for the two triggers can have different diameters or be made from different materials of construction.
Relatively shorter time-delay fuse 826 is disposed aft of stab detonator 824A and relatively longer time-delay fuse 828 is disposed aft of stab detonator 824B. Both fuses 826 and 828 are operatively coupled to detonating cord 830, which, in turn, is operatively coupled to booster 832. The booster comprises a small amount of high explosive, such as PBXN-5. Explosive payload 834 is aft of booster 832. Most of payload 834 is disposed in tail 104.
In the illustrative embodiment, two separate triggers 110 and 112 were used to trigger the relatively shorter or relatively longer time delays. In some alternative embodiments, a single trigger that is physically adapted to trigger either or both fuses is used.
It is to be understood that the disclosure teaches just one example of the illustrative embodiment and that many variations of the invention can easily be devised by those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure and that the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the following claims.
This case claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/985,516 filed on Nov. 5, 2007 and incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1347716 | Semple | Jul 1920 | A |
1531717 | Remondy | Mar 1925 | A |
2465395 | O'Rear | Mar 1949 | A |
2754760 | Wynn | Jul 1956 | A |
2806428 | Weiss | Sep 1957 | A |
2948220 | Bennett | Aug 1960 | A |
3633510 | Bernardin | Jan 1972 | A |
3808972 | Cammack et al. | May 1974 | A |
3968748 | Burford et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4690057 | Carlsson | Sep 1987 | A |
5591935 | Shamblen et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5612505 | O'Brasky et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5872324 | Watson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6540175 | Mayersak et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
7343860 | Michel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7856928 | Paulic | Dec 2010 | B1 |
20030140811 | Bone | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20080011179 | Michel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100307326 | Paulic | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60985516 | Nov 2007 | US |