The disclosure relates to a counter track joint with an axial displacement range.
DE 100 60 120 A1 discloses a ball-type constant velocity joint in the form of a counter track joint with an axial displacement range, wherein the controlled angles of the first and second track pairs change in opposite directions along the axial displacement of the joint inner part with respect to the joint outer part. The guidance of the joint at each point on the axial displacement path varies as a result of the continuous change in the control angles of the first and second track pairs in opposite directions along the axial displacement of the joint. In addition, either a maximum or a minimum of the control angles is reached at each end point of displacement travel in the first and second track pairs.
The present disclosure allows for making available a large control angle over a largest possible part of an axial displacement travel so that particularly good guidance of the joint is provided in a normal working range of a joint, wherein reduced control properties compared to the working range can also be allowed for in the end ranges of the axial displacement travel. The end ranges of the axial displacement travel are to be configured here only with respect to the mounting capability of the joint.
An exemplary joint is also proposed which may be configured with respect to its own axial working range.
More specifically, a joint according to an exemplary arrangement is configured in the form of a counter track joint, in particular as a ball-type constant velocity joint. The exemplary counter track joint comprises a joint outer part with first outer ball tracks and second outer ball tracks, as well as a joint inner part with first inner ball tracks and second inner ball tracks. In this context, first outer ball tracks form first track pairs with first inner ball tracks, and second outer ball tracks form second track pairs with second inner ball tracks, wherein torque-transmitting balls are guided in the first track pairs and second track pairs. Furthermore, a ball cage with cage windows, which are distributed around the circumference and in which the balls are held, is provided. First aperture angles are respectively provided between tangents to contact points of a ball with the first outer ball track and with the first inner ball track and second aperture angles are respectively provided between tangents to contact points of a ball with the second outer ball track and with the second inner ball track, wherein the first aperture angles of the first track pairs open towards a first side of the joint, and the second aperture angles of the second track pairs open towards a second side of the joint. Furthermore, on the one hand, axial play is provided between the joint outer part and the ball cage, and, on the other hand, inner axial play is provided between the ball cage and joint inner part, said axial play permitting relative axial displacement of the joint inner part with respect to the joint outer part. In this context, a range of the axial displacement is divided into a first end range, a central working range and into a second end range, wherein, where the joint is straight (that is to say not articulated or not deflected), the first track pairs and second track pairs have, in the range of the axial displacement, first aperture angles and second aperture angles which are opposed but always equal in absolute value, wherein in addition, the first aperture angles and the second aperture angles vary jointly over the entire range of the axial displacement, and the first aperture angles and second aperture angles are largest in the central working range.
The ball cage is supported, in particular, at least with partial ranges of its outer and/or inner circumferential surface on the joint inner part and/or the joint outer part in the radial direction and is guided through the balls of the cage in the axial direction. In this context, the balls are self-centered as a result of the special configuration of the joint in the form of a counter track joint. The joint is therefore self-centering axially overall and the forces which act on the cage are kept small.
The ball cage is at least partially spherical in shape on its inner circumferential face and/or outer circumferential surface, with the result that radial support is made possible with respect to the joint outer part and/or the joint inner part, in particular when the joint is articulated.
Axial stops for the ball cage within the joint for limiting the axial displacement, that is to say the axial displacement travel of the joint, are not necessarily provided,
Furthermore, the ball cage can have chamfers on its axial end faces on its inner circumferential surface, which chamfers permit relatively large deflection of the joint inner part with respect to the joint outer part without the joint inner part colliding with the ball cage which is deflected by half the angle of articulation.
According to one advantageous refinement of the exemplary joint, the joint outer part is embodied as a bell which is closed on one side. In this context, the joint outer part is also embodied in a single piece.
In particular transition ranges, within which a transition between the absolute values of the aperture angles takes place, are provided between the first end range and the central working range, and between the second end range and the central working range. The terms first end range, central working range, second end range and transition range denote, in particular, the respective axial arrangement of the joint inner part with respect to the joint outer part. If the joint is located in the first end range, the joint inner part is displaced in the axial direction with respect to the joint outer part, towards a first side of the joint. If the joint is located in the second end range, the joint inner part is displaced in the opposing axial direction with respect to the joint outer part, towards a second side of the joint.
According to one advantageous embodiment of the joint, the first track pairs and second track pairs are arranged alternately in the circumferential direction of the joint.
In one exemplary arrangement, the joint has 2+2n balls, wherein n is a natural number with an absolute value greater than or equal to 1.
In a further development of the joint, the first track pairs and second track pairs are each arranged in pairs one next to the other. In such an embodiment of the joint, the joint has 4+4n balls, wherein n is a natural number with absolute value greater than or equal to 1.
Joints with 6, 8, 10, 12 or 16 balls are contemplated.
According to a further particular advantageous embodiment, the first aperture angles and the second aperture angles are 3 to 11 angular degrees, and in certain embodiments may be 7 to 11 angular degrees, in the central working range when the joint is straight (not articulated). Aperture angles are therefore provided which are embodied with such a magnitude in the actual, axially limited working range of the joint, that the joint has good control properties. In this context, the central working range is the part of the axial displacement of the joint inner part with respect to the joint outer part which is arranged between the respective first end ranges and second end ranges with small control angles or aperture angles. The range of the axial displacement is therefore predefined by the shapes of the first track pairs and second track pairs, and is divided, for first track pairs and second track pairs, into a first end range, a central working range and a second end range.
According to another further advantageous embodiment, the first aperture angles and second aperture angles are 0 to 5 angular degrees, and may be 0 to 3 angular degrees, in the first end range and in the second end range when the joint is not articulated.
The transition of the track shapes between the end ranges and the central working range is, in particular, configured in a gradual fashion with respect to the profile of the absolute values of the aperture angles, with the result that a sudden change in the absolute values of the aperture angles does not occur. In particular, the transition range is considered to be a separate range with the result that a combination of end ranges with aperture angles from 0 to 3 angular degrees with a central working range with aperture angles from 7 to 11 angular degrees is also possible.
According to a further advantageous embodiment, the central working range of the joint is characterized by a length of at maximum 40 mm, in particular by a length of 10 to 30 mm. This provides, in particular, a joint which has a very wide central working range with good control properties.
In the range with good control properties (central working range), the balls are arranged with respect to the fitting of the track around the balls and/or track depth and with respect to the contact angles of the balls with the ball tracks, as in a conventional joint.
However, the small control properties in the end ranges make it possible to reduce the groove depth of the outer ball tracks and/or inner ball tracks and therefore the fitting of the track around the balls. Furthermore, the contact angles of the balls with the ball tracks can be reduced. These measures are possible since the maximum power is not transmitted in the end ranges during operation. According to the inventive joints, the maximum transmission of force occurs only in particular when the balls are located in the central working range. The joint according to the exemplary embodiment of the disclosure is configured for this special application case.
A further advantage of this method of construction is the radially compact cage since the radial ball stroke is only small. As a result of the small aperture angles in the end ranges, only small radial deflection of the balls occurs when the latter moves along the ball tracks owing to articulation of the joint or as a result of axial displacement of the joint outer part with respect to the joint inner part. As a result of the ball tracks which are adapted structurally to reduced requirements in the end ranges, the joint is of a radially compact design while at the same time maintaining long overall displacement travel. This compactness simultaneously reduces the weight of the joint considerably. A further advantage is the high degree of rigidity of the hub, that is say of the inner part of the joint, since the tracks which run in the longitudinal direction do not have to be embodied with such radial depth in the end ranges (reduced fitting of the track around the balls, reduced contact angles). This provides the possibility of enlarging the reception in the hub for an intermediate shaft, so that an intermediate shaft with an increased diameter can be used and increased torques can thus be transferred.
In addition, according to a further advantageous embodiment, the joint has a first end range and a second end range, each with an end range length of at maximum 15 mm, in particular an end range length of 5 to 10 mm.
These end ranges are, in particular to be configured with respect to the mountability of the joint. It is therefore possible to provide, in the end ranges, axial stops for the ball cage which are arranged in the joint outer part and/or in the joint inner part. In particular, the joint inner part and/or joint outer part can be configured in such a way that an axial mountability or demountability is made possible in the straight (not articulated) state of the joint. This is to be provided by means of an exemplary embodiment of the guide surfaces of the ball cage on the joint outer part and/or on the joint inner part and/or by means of a particular configuration of the track shapes in at least one end range of the axial displacement.
According to a further particularly advantageous development of the joint, at least inner tangent angles of the first inner ball tracks and second inner ball tracks or outer tangent angles of the first outer ball tracks and second outer ball tracks are equal to zero in terms of absolute value in the first end range or in the second end range. In this context, the inner tangent angle between a tangent to the contact point of the ball with the inner ball track and a first central axis of the joint inner part as well as the outer tangent angle between a tangent to the contact point of the ball with the outer ball track and a second central axis of the joint outer part is formed.
In particular, an embodiment is possible in which in the first end range inner tangent angles of the first inner ball tracks and second inner ball tracks are equal to zero and in the second end range outer tangent angles of the first outer ball tracks and second outer ball tracks are equal to zero; or in which in the second end range inner tangent angles of the first end inner ball tracks and second inner ball tracks are equal to zero, and in the first end range outer tangent angles of the first outer ball tracks and second outer ball tracks are equal to zero.
These embodiments of the joint with “zero degrees” tangent angles in terms of absolute value are referred to below as “the second embodiment”. An inner tangent angle with the absolute value of zero is therefore present given parallelism between the tangent to the contact point of the ball with the inner ball track and the first central axis of the joint inner part, and correspondingly an outer tangent angle with the absolute value zero is present given parallelism of the tangent to the contact point of the ball with the outer ball tracks and with the second central axis of the joint outer part.
As a result of this embodiment, the ball cage is guided in the end ranges of the axial displacement only by the inner tangent angles between the inner ball track and the ball or by the outer tangent angles between the outer ball track and the ball, which are unequal to zero. As a result, the ball cage is guided only by the joint inner part or only by the joint outer part, as a function of the position of the joint in the first end range or in the second end range.
The proposed joint is suitable, in particular, for the following fields of use:
As a result of the long displacement travel and simultaneously small external diameter, the joint can be used, in particular, when there are space problems (packaging). Furthermore, the advantage of reduced weight arises. Likewise, this joint concept described herein can be applied where long displacement travel is required for assembly or disassembly and at the same time comparatively small dynamic displacements are expected during the use/travel. This can be used in particular in rear wheel applications in the field of passenger cars (displacement joint on both sides for connecting the wheels).
If other demands are made regarding the packaging, that is to say of the overall size of the joint, the second embodiment is advantageous since here no radial deflection of the balls in the joint outer part takes place in the respective end range owing to the “zero absolute values” of the outer tangent angles, and the outer ball tracks in the respective end range do not run further in the radial direction but rather only in the axial direction. Furthermore, according to the second embodiment, a relatively large overall displacement travel can be made available by a joint given a predefined overall size. This is in particular not limited in one end range in each case and can be used as a “crash-in” feature in longitudinal shafts. This means that the joint inner part can be pushed into the joint outer part so that, in particular the joint is not destroyed in the event of a crash.
In order to reduce the size of the joint further in the axial and radial direction, there is the option of fastening the balls either in the joint outer part or in the joint inner part, so that there can be a transition from (pure) rolling friction to mixed friction and/or sliding friction. This can be implemented, for example, by an axial end stop in the outer or inner ball tracks in the respective end range, so that the balls can no longer be moved further in the axial direction with respect to the joint outer part or the joint inner part.
It is necessary, in particular, to take into account the fact that the so-called NVH—(noise-vibration-harshness) properties in the end ranges of the joint are worse in the case of a joint according to the second embodiment than in the case of other embodiments of the joint according to the disclosure.
It is to be noted that the features which are specified individually in the dependently formulated patent claims can be combined with one another in any desired technically appropriate way and define further refinements of the disclosure. Furthermore, the features which are specified in the patent claims are described and explained in more detail in the description, with further exemplary embodiments of the disclosure being presented.
The disclosure and the technical surroundings are explained in more detail below with reference to the figures. It is to be noted that the figures show particularly exemplary embodiment variants of the disclosure, but are not restricted thereto. In the schematic drawings:
The exemplary embodiments, which are illustrated in
The present application is not restricted to the illustrated exemplary embodiments. Instead, numerous further refinements of the invention are possible. For example, instead of the illustrated S-shaped first inner ball tracks 6, second inner ball tracks 7, first outer ball tracks 3 and second outer ball tracks 4 it is also possible to use other track shapes, in particular even non-continuous, segmented track shapes. These have non-continuous transitions, in particular in the transition range from the first end range 21 and second end range 23 to the central working range 22, wherein the central working range 22 has continuously running track shapes in the joint inner part 5 and joint outer part 2. Furthermore, the first end ranges 21 and second end ranges 23 can be configured differently from one another.
A further advantage of the joint is that it is well suited for use with an embodiment of the joint outer part as a flange. In this design, the joint is connected to a differential by screw connections through the joint outer part. As a result of the design of the joint which is compact, in particular, in the radial direction, the screw connections are arranged at a short distance from the center of the joint, with the result that a relatively large lateral force acts on the screws. Either six large screw diameters or preferably eight (or more) relatively small screw diameters can then be used since the exclusively axial and radial profile of the tracks makes available more installation space between the tracks than in the case of joints with ball tracks which have a profile in the axial direction and in the circumferential direction of the joint. In the case of large ball track lengths which are necessary for displacement joints, the conventionally used so-called VL joint (with ball tracks which run in the circumferential direction) can then be replaced by the joints according to the disclosure. Joints which are of compact design can then be used for the first time since in the case of long displacement travel the previously used VL joints have to be constructed with relatively large external diameters in order to provide sufficient installation space for screw connections between the intersecting ball tracks. The joints according to the disclosure can therefore take up a relatively large lateral force 34 acting on the screws (shear force, unit [N]) since in the case of the same PCR (pitch circle radius) more installation space is available between the ball tracks and a corresponding stability of the joint outer part is ensured.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/068343 | 11/26/2010 | WO | 00 | 8/8/2013 |