The invention relates to a constant velocity joint in the form of a counter track joint with the following characteristics: an outer joint part having a first longitudinal axis and comprising first outer ball tracks and second outer ball tracks; an inner joint pan having a second longitudinal axis and comprising first inner ball tracks and second inner ball tracks; the first outer ball tracks and the first inner ball tracks form first pairs of tracks; the second outer ball tracks and the second inner ball tacks form second pairs of tracks; the pairs of tracks each accommodate a torque transmitting ball; a ball cage is positioned between the outer joint part and the inner joint part and comprises circumferentially distributed cage windows which each receive at least one of the balls; when the joint is in the aligned condition, the first pairs of tracks open in the central joint plane in a first direction, and when the joint is in the aligned condition, the second pairs of tracks open in the central joint plane in a second direction.
Counter track joints of the aforementioned type are basically known from U.S. Publication No. 2004/0033837 A1, wherein joints with 6 balls and with 8 balls are shown. The type of ball tracks here corresponds to the type known from Rzeppa joints (RF joints) and undercut free-joints (UF joints). This means that the center lines of the ball tracks consist of uniform radii (RF joint) or consist of radii and adjacent axially parallel lines (UF joint). In the described counter track joints, the axial opening direction of the pairs of tracks alternates circumferentially, resulting in the type of counter track joint.
Known from DE 103 37 612 A1 are counter track joints in which the track center lines of the first pairs of tracks having an opening angle with an opening direction with aligned joint pointing toward the joint bottom designed in such a way that the opening angle experiences a reversal in its opening direction starting at a specific articulation angle when the joint is articulated. In particular, this is realized by virtue of the fact that the center lines of the ball tracks of the first pairs of tracks are S-shaped, and thereby each exhibit a turning point.
Known inter alia from U.S. Publication No. 2004/116192 A1 are counter track joints in which the center lines of the first ball tracks have a turning point near the joint opening, so that the center lines of the first outer ball tracks are S-shaped. Due to the symmetry condition, the same holds true for the center lines of the first inner ball tracks of the joint inner part. The articulation angle of these counter track joints can be increased in this way.
Joints of the kind mentioned at the outset have been manufactured in various sizes, wherein the geometric conditions were derived from the available ball sizes taking into account the required torque capacity, using standard balls from ball bearing manufacture as the joint balls. In addition, the configuration of known joints has also been determined or influenced by the fitting dimensions of the available intermediate shafts, i.e., in particular the pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines of such intermediate shafts, and must correspond to the pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines in the joint inner part.
An object of this invention is to create a counter track joint of the kind mentioned at the outset optimized to the building space, which occupies the least possible radial building space at a given torque capacity.
A first solution provides that the ratio (V1) between the pitch circle diameter (PCDS) of the shaft splines in the joint inner part to the third power and the product of ball diameter (DK) squared and pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) assumes a value of between 0.9 and 1.3, i.e.,
0.9<V1<1.3 with V1=PCDS3/(DK2−PCDB).
In a second solution, the ratio (V3) between the pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines in the joint inner part PODS and the OR factor lies between 0.34 and 0.37, wherein the OR factor is defined as the sum of the pitch circle diameter of the balls (PCDB) with aligned joint and the ball diameter (DK), so that
0.34<V3<0.37 with V3=PCDS/(PCDB+DK).
The above approaches are based on postulations that the optimized configuration must have the necessary section modulus of the shaft splines in the joint inner part, and at the same time that the permissible load on the balls may not be exceeded taking into account the Hertz pressure, and finally that the outer diameter of the joint is to be kept low. To this end, the above approaches are used to indicate suitable configuration conditions with which these requirements are satisfied by selecting a large enough pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines and ball diameter, wherein the pitch circle diameter of the balls, being of importance besides the ball diameter for the outer diameter of the joint is designed as low as possible.
Each of the two approaches mentioned leads to the objective on its own. However, the result can be optimized by also using both approaches in combination to further pinpoint the results according to the invention.
One embodiment provides that the ratio (V2) between the IR factor and the OR factor measures between 0.525 and 0.585, wherein the IR factor is defined as the difference between the pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) and the ball diameter (DK), and the OR factor is defined as the sum of the pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint PCDB and the ball diameter DK, so that
0.525<V2<0.585 with V2=(PCDB−DK)/(PCDB+DK).
In combination with at least one of the two aforementioned approaches, this dimensioning yields a particularly favorable result.
Another embodiment further provides that the ratio (V4) between the pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines in the joint inner part (PCDS) and the IR factor measures between 0.58 and 0.65, wherein the IR factor is defined as the difference between the pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) and the ball diameter (DK), so that
0.58<V4<0.65 with V4=PCDS/(PCDB−DK).
In combination with at least one of the two aforementioned approaches, this dimensioning yields a particularly favorable result.
With respect to the forces on the ball cage and other properties that determine joint function, it has proven favorable to alternate the first pairs of tracks and the second pairs of tracks over the circumference of the joint.
The joint can be designed as a six-ball joint, and in a particularly favorable design, is an eight-ball joint. The joint is configured in a particularly advantageous way, wherein the articulation angle ranges from 25° to 45°, in particular from 30° to 40°. This stipulation means that the balls are still reliably slung in the inner and outer ball tracks within these articulation angle ranges, and that the first balls only start exiting the ball tracks at articulation angles exceeding these ranges.
The joint according to the invention can be designed as a disc joint with unilateral flanging on the joint outer part, or as a monoblock joint, wherein a joint bottom and shaft journal are integrally molded on the joint outer part.
Joints according to the invention can be used for the side shafts of motor vehicles that establish the connection between the differential output and wheel hub. In this case, there is a particularly favorable application as a differential-side fixed joint in such side shafts, which have two fixed joints and a plunging unit in the intermediate shaft.
Joints according to the invention can also be used in longitudinal drive shafts of motor vehicles that comprise at least one fixed joint and a plunging joint or at least two fixed joints and a plunging unit.
Another application involves multi-part longitudinal drive shafts in motor vehicles, which in addition to a fixed joint have at least one intermediate joint and a plunging joint and/or at least one intermediate joint and a longitudinal plunging unit.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings, and will be described below.
A) in an axial view; and
B) in a longitudinal section along the B-B line.
A) in an axial view; and
B) in a longitudinal section along the B-B line.
A) in an axial view;
B) in a longitudinal section along the B-B line; and
C) in a longitudinal section along the C-C line.
A) in an axial view;
B) in a longitudinal section along the B-B line; and
C) in a longitudinal section along the C-C line.
The two depictions on
The two depictions on
The individual depictions on
The individual depictions on
In each embodiment of the joints 11, 112, 111, 211, the ratio (V1) between the pitch circle diameter (PCDS) of the shaft splines in the joint inner part to the third power and the product of ball diameter (DK) squared and pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) assumes a value of between 0.9 and 1.3, i.e.,
0.9<V1<1.3 with V1=PCDS3/(DK2−PCDB).
Alternatively or, in addition, the ratio (V3) between the pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines in the joint inner part (PCDS) and the OR factor lies between 0.34 and 0.37, wherein the OR factor is defined as the sum of the pitch circle diameter of the balls (PCDB) with aligned joint and the ball diameter (DK), so that
0.34<V3<0.37 with V3=PCDS/(PCDB+DK).
In combination with at least one of V1 or V3 being satisfied, the ratio (V2) between the IR factor and the OR factor measures between 0.525 and 0.585, wherein the IR factor is defined as the difference between the pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) and the ball diameter (DK), and the OR factor is defined as the sum of the pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) and the ball diameter (DK), so that
0.525<V2<0.585 with V2=(PCDB−DK)/(PCDB+DK).
Further in combination with at least one of V1 or V3 being satisfied, the ratio (V4) between the pitch circle diameter of the shaft splines in the joint inner part (PCDS) and the IR factor measures between 0.58 and 0.65, wherein the IR factor is defined as the difference between the pitch circle diameter of the balls with aligned joint (PCDB) and the ball diameter (DK), so that
0.58<V4<0.65 with V4=PCDS/(PCDB−DK).
For each embodiment, the joint can be configured wherein the articulation angle ranges from 25° to 45°, in particular from 30° to 40°.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/012379 | 11/2/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/19/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/048031 | 5/11/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3475924 | Aucktor | Nov 1969 | A |
4177654 | Aucktor | Dec 1979 | A |
6379255 | Cermak et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6848999 | Weckerling et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20010004611 | Sahashi et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010006910 | Krude et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030008717 | Welschof | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040033837 | Weckerling et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040116192 | Krude et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103 37 612 | Jun 2004 | DE |
0 802 341 | Oct 1997 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080053735 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |