The invention described relates generally to vertical acting doors, and more particularly to counterbalance systems for vertical acting doors.
A longstanding problem in the design and use of vertical acting doors, such as residential garage door systems, is the provision of a suitable counterbalance system for counterbalancing the weight of the door when it is moved between open and closed positions. Ideally, very little force should be required to move the door between the open and closed positions, whether by an automatic door operator or manual lift. Existing counterbalance systems are not entirely satisfactory for all conditions of service. Such systems do not always match a door's torque requirements and thus, do not offer optimum door movement. Typical counterbalance systems generally require manual winding of the torsion springs, an occasionally difficult operation. Spring replacement is also difficult and normally requires disassembly of the entire counterbalance system or at least major portions thereof. In addition, existing systems often require special tools for installation and/or do not allow for efficient customization to accommodate unique door installations.
Consequently, objects described herein are to provide new and improved counterbalance systems for a vertical acting door and methods for counterbalancing vertical acting doors that address many of the aforementioned deficiencies.
Counterbalance systems described herein include at least one counterbalance unit, the unit generally comprising a spring element, an anchor mechanism and an optional winding mechanism, which work to effectively counterbalance a vertical acting door. The system may include a plurality of counterbalance units or portions thereof to allow customization for unique door installations, for example, to accommodate doors of differing weights.
The spring element in one embodiment includes a power spring disposed within a casing member. The power spring offers a means for efficiently and rapidly matching the effective spring rate and the resultant torque exerted by the power spring as the door moves between open and closed positions. The power spring replaces a torsion coil spring typically used with counterbalance systems, because the power spring performance characteristics better match a typical vertical acting door torque requirement. The casing is used to restrain and encloses the spring element thereby preventing direct exposure to surfaces of the spring, especially under a high load or torque.
The anchoring mechanism allows for a mechanically uncomplicated and releasable coupling between the casing of the power spring and certain anchoring components. The anchoring mechanism offers specific connectibility and cooperation between components in the counterbalance system. The anchoring mechanism, as a means for attachment and removal of certain components without tools, provides a mechanical advantage over other comparative systems.
The winding mechanism is provided when to adjust the tension of the spring element. In one embodiment, the winding mechanism is coupled to the casing. In other embodiments, the winding mechanism is coupled to an arbor, which is secured to an end of the spring element. In either configuration, the winding mechanism provides for an efficient method adjusting and otherwise tensioning the spring element.
To accommodate unique and varying sized vertical acting door installations, multiple counterbalance units of the described system may be stacked and otherwise secured together in an efficient and space saving manner to effectively counterbalance the vertical acting door.
With use of a counterbalance systems described herein, improvements for counterbalancing a vertical acting door are found, such as eliminating a previous necessity of removing an old spring counterbalance and replacing with a new one when accommodating a heavier door, providing a better match of a door's torque requirements for improved door movement, offering an easier method of adjusting a counterbalance load, providing improvements for replacing and/or repairing parts of the counterbalance system, eliminating a need for additional or special tools for installation, and allowing for efficient customization to accommodate unique door installations.
Those skilled in the art will further appreciate the advantages and superior features described upon reading the description which follows in conjunction with the drawings.
Additional features, as well as more details thereof, and the overall systems and devices described herein, will become readily apparent from a review of the following detailed description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIGS. 7 and 7A-7C are illustrations of an arbor used in the counterbalance system of
With the detailed description, like elements are marked throughout the specification and drawings with the same reference numerals, respectively. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain elements are shown in generalized or schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness. It should be understood that the embodiments of the disclosure herein described are merely illustrative of the principles of the invention.
Referring first to
Referring specifically to
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring specifically to
Regardless of the configuration, however, during assembly, the enlarged portions of the slots 28 are aligned with the fasteners 26 to enable the fasteners 26 to be inserted therein. The casing 16 is then positioned such that once the fasteners 26 are inserted within the slots 28, the counterbalance unit 10 is secured to the bracket 34 via rotational movement of casing 16 (depicted by arrow 14) relative to the bracket 34 such that the fasteners 26, and in particular, the stems 26a of the fasteners frictionally engage the sidewall 28a of the slots 28 to prevent rotational movement thereof. Furthermore, each fastener 26 includes a head 26b having a diameter sized larger than the width of the non-enlarged portion of the slot 28 so that the slot 28 prevents the head 26b from passing therethrough and thereby preventing axial separation of the casing 16 from the bracket 34. It should be understood that in lieu of the above-described fastening method, alternative anchoring means and elements may be incorporated. In such a manner, anchoring is provided without a requirement for additional tools, which presents an easy, simplified, and quick installation process.
As illustrated in
As described above, multiple counterbalance units 10 and 60 are coupleable together in series in order to accommodate upward acting doors of varying weights. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
Referring to
In the embodiment illustrated in
According to embodiments disclosed herein, with more than one counterbalance unit 10, a single winding mechanism 40 is operable to tension each spring element 15, regardless of the number of units 10 secured together. For example, a single driving gear 44 is turned by a handle or power tool compatible with the driven gear 42, which rotates the first casing 10 as well as a second casing coupled to the first casing and so on. Referring to
For operation of any counterbalance system 1 described herein with a vertical acting door, the system 1 is oftentimes positioned at or near the opposing ends of the elongated rotatable shaft 12, although the counterbalance system 1 may be otherwise positioned, such as, for example, at any position along the rotatable shaft 12. A representative configuration is depicted in
Referring now to
According to some embodiments, each stacking stud 150 and 152 includes at least one end that is threaded for insertion into a respective threaded casing opening 160 and 162; however, it should be understood that in lieu of a threading attachment, each end of the stacking studs 150 and 152 may be otherwise secured within the casing openings 160 and 162. For example, according to some embodiments, ends 152 or 154 may be sized to frictionally engage respective casing openings 160 and 162 or may be secured via an adhesive or welding. Thus, when assembling the counterbalance system 101, for example, once and end of the stacking studs 150 and 152 are secured into a corresponding opening 160 and 162 of a first casing 116, a corresponding opening 160 or 162 in a second casing 116 is aligned with the opposite end of the studs (i.e., the exposed end of the stacking stud 150 and 152) and is moved toward the first casing 116 until the exposed end of the stacking studs 150 and 152 are disposed within the respective opening 160 and 162 of the second casing 116. In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring specifically to
Referring now to
Referring specifically to FIGS. 7 and 7A-7C, the arbor 122 includes a plurality of teeth 178 on respective ends of the arbor 122 to enable adjacently positioned arbors 122 (
While FIGS. 7 and 7A-7C illustrate multiple teeth 178, it should be understood that respective ends of the arbor 122 can have only a single tooth 178 on each end. Furthermore and as illustrated in
According to embodiments disclosed herein, the manual winder mechanism 140 is securely fastened to the arbor 122 by a similar locking engagement as described above for two adjacently positioned arbors 122. In particular, the winder mechanism 140 includes a pair of teeth 178 and gaps 180 disposed between the teeth 178, which are positioned to interlock with corresponding teeth 178 on an arbor 122. During installation, once the teeth 178 are interlocked with corresponding teeth 178 on the arbor 122, one or more set-screws 184 (
In alternate embodiments, a counterbalance unit 10 is formed having one or more casings 10 without an elongate sidewall 17 extending between the end caps 18 and 20. In such embodiments, as illustrated in
According to embodiments disclosed herein, counterbalance units 10, 110 are configured to support spring elements 15, 115 of differing sizes. For example, according to some embodiments, a counterbalance unit 10, 110 is operable to store a spring element 15, 115 capable of countering 50 to 100 pounds of door weight. Thus, if 150 pounds of door weight is to be counterbalanced, two casing 16 or 116, and in particular, a casing 16, 116 having a 50 pound spring and a second casing 16,116 having a 100 pound spring (or any combinations thereof), are stackable to counter the 150 pounds of door weight. It should be understood however, that in lieu of or in addition to stacking casings 16, 116, the casings may be directly secured to other portions of the counterbalance system 1, 101, such as for example, multiple casings 16, 116 are secured to multiple brackets (i.e., end brackets, center brackets, cable drums, etc.).
In view of the description and drawings, described herein are improved counterbalance systems 1 and 101 and methods of counterbalancing vertical acting doors, which overcome, among other things previously described, the problems associated with counterbalancing doors having sections and/or portions thereof which are of different weights. The systems described herein are operable with so-called one piece or California type doors as well as conventional vertical acting doors.
In one or more embodiments a counterbalance systems 1, 101 for a vertical acting door is provided which includes at least one counterbalance unit 10, 110 having a spring element 15, 115 disposed in a protective casing 16, 116 which is releasably mounted adjacent an upward acting door and connected directly to a counterbalance shaft 12, 112. The systems 1, 101 optionally including a removable and releasable winding mechanism 40, 140 for adjusting stored energy within the spring elements 15, 115. The at least one counterbalance unit 10, 110 and the winding mechanism 40, 140 are separable units that do not require additional tools for installation and may be easily serviced or replaced. Furthermore, one or more of the counterbalance units 10, 110 or components therein may be disassembled without requiring removal of the entire unit from the counterbalance shaft.
Still further is an improved counterbalance system 1, 101 for a vertical acting door, wherein the system includes at least one counterbalance unit 10, 110 and a means for anchoring. The at least one counterbalance unit 10, 110 is selected to meet the unique specification of a particular door weight or size and may be conveniently installed and connected to the door counterbalance shaft 12, 112 with a simple mechanical coupling. The at least one counterbalance unit 10, 110 includes a high load spring element 15, 115 and cooperative casing 16, 116 to enclose the spring element 15, 115. The counterbalance unit 10, 110 further includes an interlocking arrangement between the high load spring and anchoring components that is mechanically uncomplicated and reversible, providing a compact arrangement of the counterbalance system 10, 110 and allows for ease and efficiency with installation.
In addition, described herein is an improved vertical acting door counterbalance system that is easy to install, repair and replace, with an option to adjust counterbalance forces by including a winding mechanism 40, 140 coupled to at least one power spring element and is easily accessible for adjusting spring torque. The amount of counterbalance force being provided may be monitored and/or adjusted during the installation process or after installation.
The foregoing description is of exemplary embodiments and methods for operation. The invention is not limited to the described examples or embodiments. Various alterations and modifications to the disclosed embodiments may be made without departing from the scope of the embodiments and appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
924334 | Fouch | Jun 1909 | A |
1235092 | Earll | Jul 1917 | A |
1298716 | Hoover | Apr 1919 | A |
1392918 | Cornell | Oct 1921 | A |
1941880 | Earll | Jan 1934 | A |
2098016 | Schuetz | Nov 1937 | A |
2485385 | Komassa | Oct 1949 | A |
2781618 | Larson | Feb 1957 | A |
3929210 | Cutler et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4182615 | Weissman | Jan 1980 | A |
4725029 | Herve | Feb 1988 | A |
5201897 | Whiting | Apr 1993 | A |
5275223 | Magro et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5284199 | Finch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5420762 | Lewis | May 1995 | A |
5698073 | Vincenzi | Dec 1997 | A |
5803149 | Halley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5880532 | Stopher | Mar 1999 | A |
5934354 | Price et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6125582 | Mondragon et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134835 | Krupke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6253824 | Mullet et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325134 | Mullet | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6398179 | Soles | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401792 | Mullet et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6588156 | Mullet | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6845804 | Mullet | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6869346 | Wendt et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7118465 | Kim | Oct 2006 | B2 |
RE39504 | Scates et al. | Mar 2007 | E |
7367160 | Mullet et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7686061 | Mullet et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717155 | Mullet | May 2010 | B2 |
7717156 | Costello et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7784521 | Mullet et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8251325 | Molter | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8567476 | Costello et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8807196 | Mullet et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20090249695 | Jain | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110203748 | Mullet et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110203754 | Mullet et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120031571 | Mullet et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Wayne Dalton, Model 3982 iDrive™ Extension Spring Kit, Rev. Jul. 6, 2007. |
Wayne Dalton, TorqueMaster® Single and Double Spring Installation Instructions and Owner's Manual, Rev. Aug. 3, 2009. |