1. Field of the Invention
Embodiments disclosed herein relate generally to containers for storing and transporting drilling waste. More specifically, the present invention relates to skips for storing and transporting drill cuttings and substances produced in the course of offshore drilling operations.
2. Background Art
Once the drilling fluid is returned to the surface, it is passed through screens, vibratory separators, or other filtering arrangements to separate the waste material and drill cuttings from the drilling fluid. The drilling fluid may then be sent to a reservoir or returned to the system and reused. Drilling cuttings processed by filtering arrangements may contain approximately 10% to 20% moisture (oil, water) by weight. Because the waste material and drill cuttings contain contaminants, such as chemicals, hydrocarbons such as oil and other components hazardous to the environment, environmental regulations require that the waste material and drill cuttings be processed and disposed of in an environmentally acceptable manner. Contaminated waste material and drill cuttings recovered from an offshore drilling rig typically require removal from the rig or wellbore for treatment on land to decontaminate them before they can be safely disposed.
The waste material and drill cuttings are collected and stored on the drilling platform 114 or vessel in small containers, also known as mud skips, skips, or cuttings boxes, before being transported onshore for processing. The skips may be lifted by a crane 112 and loaded on a ship 116, or supply boat, for transportation to a shore base facility. The skips typically have about a five ton capacity and a typical drilling operation may produce up to 800 ton of drilling waste. Many skips are necessary on a typical drilling rig to handle the large amounts of drill cuttings generated. Dedicated crews are necessary to handle the skips on the drilling and at the shore base facility, cleaning crews are necessary to clean the skips after each use, and crews are needed to address safety and environmental concerns in each operation handling the skips.
As shown in
Typically, mud skips for offshore drilling rigs range in size from 15 barrel (bbl) containers to 25 bbl containers. The skips may be comprised of galvanized steel that is internally coated for corrosion resistance. A skip, when empty, may range in weight from approximately 3000 lbs (1300 kg) to 4500 lbs (2000 kg) or more. The size of a skip may also vary based on the space available on a drilling platform for storage and the amount of drill cuttings produced. For example, a skip may vary in size from approximately 7.5 ft long by 4.5 ft wide by 4 ft high to 8 ft long by 8 ft wide by 4 ft high or larger. Accordingly, the gross total weight and capacity of each skip varies due to the variation in empty weight and size of the skip. The lids of the skips are also extremely heavy so as to provide a greater seal of the skip opening. Typically, a lid may weigh several hundred pounds or more. The heavy weight of the lids and the position of the operator atop the skip often present a safety concern for personnel when opening and closing the lids. Further, the lids are typically only safely secured in a fully open or fully closed position.
Accordingly, there exists a need to effectively and safely seal and store drill cuttings and waste material in mud skips.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to an apparatus comprising a container configured to store and transport drilling waste, a lid coupled to the container, and at least one arm coupled to the lid and configured to lift or lower the lid when moved, wherein the at least one arm comprises a counterweight.
In another aspect, embodiment disclosed herein relate to a method of opening and closing an apparatus, the method comprising moving at least one arm coupled to a lid of the apparatus to an open position, wherein the apparatus is configured to store and transport drilling waste, disposing drilling waste in the apparatus, and moving the at least one arm coupled to the lid of the apparatus to a closed position.
In another aspect, embodiments disclosed here relate to a method of modifying a mud skip, the method comprising coupling at least one arm to a lid of the mud skip configured to store and transport drilling waste, wherein the at least one arm comprises a counterweight.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
In one aspect, embodiments disclosed herein relate to a storage container for drilling waste. In particular, disclosed embodiments provide an arm coupled to a lid of a mud skip for moving and securing the lid. Additionally, disclosed embodiments provide a method for modifying a mud skip to include an arm for moving and securing the lid of a mud skip. In one embodiment, an arm coupled to the lid of the mud skip allows the operator to open and close the lid while standing beside the mud skip. In one embodiment, the arm comprises a counterweight that reduces the amount of force or weight necessary to move the heavy lids open or closed. In another embodiment, the arm, in conjunction with an arm lock, secures the lid in open or closed positions by varying increments. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide a safer and more effective mud skip.
For example, at least one hinge 944 (
The arm 736 may be coupled to the lid 732 by any method known in the art for safely securing two load bearing pieces together. For example, in one embodiment the at least one arm 736 may be bolted to the lid 732. Alternatively, the at least one arm 736 may be welded to the lid 732. In yet another embodiment, the at least one arm 736 may be releasably coupled to the lid 732. In this embodiment, the at least one arm 736 may be coupled to the lid 732 to lift or lower the lid 732 and then released and removed from the lid 732 when not in use. In this example, the at least one arm 736 used to lift and lower the lid 732 of a first mud skip may be removed and used to lift and lower a lid of a second mud skip. Additionally, the releasable coupling of the at least one arm 736 with the lid 732 allows the operator to remove the at least one arm 736 from lid 732 of the mud skip 730 to prevent interference of or damage to the arm 736 when mud skips are transported or stacked on top of one another.
The at least one arm 736 may comprise at least two sections 750, 752 (shown in
In one embodiment, the second section 752 of the at least one arm 736 may comprise a counterweight that accounts for the weight of the lid 732. In this embodiment, the weight of the counterweight is such that when the second section 752 of the at least one arm 736 is moved forward, as indicated at F, the lid 732 may be lifted open, indicated at O. Accordingly, the second section 752 may be moved backward, indicated at B, to close the lid 732. In one embodiment, the counterweight may be integrally formed with the second section 752. For example, the second section 752 of the at least one arm 736 may be formed of a dense material in a selected size and shape, thereby providing sufficient weight to reduce the force or weight required to open the lid 732. The arm 736 may be formed of any material known in that art such that the arm may withstand the weight and movement of the lid 732. Alternatively, additional masses or weights may be coupled to the second section 752 of the at least one arm to provide sufficient weight to reduce the force or weight required to open the lid 732.
In an alternative embodiment, a second section 1052 of the at least one arm 736 may extend upwardly away from the base 740 of the mud skip 730, as shown in
In this alternative embodiment, the second section 1052 of the at least one arm 736 may comprise a counterweight that accounts for the weight of the lid 732. In this embodiment, the weight of the counterweight is such that when the second section 1052 of the at least one arm 736 is moved backward, as indicated at B, the lid 732 may be lifted open, indicated at O. Accordingly, the second section 1052 may be moved forward, indicated at F, to close the lid 732. In one embodiment, the counterweight may be integrally formed with the second section 1052. For example, the second section 1052 of the at least one arm 736 may be formed of a dense material in a selected size and shape, thereby providing sufficient weight to reduce the force or weight required to open the lid 732. The arm 736 may be formed of any material known in that art such that the arm may withstand the weight and movement of the lid 732. Alternatively, additional masses or weights may be coupled to the second section 1052 of the at least one arm to provide sufficient weight to reduce the force or weight required to open the lid 732.
Similarly,
Typically, an operator must stand on top of the mud skip 730 to lift the lid 732. To lift the lid it may take 140 lbs (65 kg) of weight or more, as may be determined by a mechanical suspended scale. In contrast, embodiments disclosed herein, for example, shown in
Embodiments of the present invention may advantageously provide a mud skip with an arm for lifting a lid of the mud skip. Embodiments of the present invention may reduce the risk of injury to personnel while operating mud skips. Further, embodiments of the invention allow for a more securely positioned lid, in both the open and closed positions. Embodiments of the present invention may prevent movement of skips when multiple skips are stacked.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
This application, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e), claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/778,787, filed Mar. 3, 2006. That application is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1115346 | Stiles | Oct 1914 | A |
1300710 | Edwards | Apr 1919 | A |
1334908 | Kinzel | Mar 1920 | A |
1655798 | Richards | Jan 1928 | A |
3135427 | Siegburg | Jun 1964 | A |
3272379 | Driza et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3737066 | Ames | Jun 1973 | A |
4032037 | Dubery | Jun 1977 | A |
4736982 | Hwang | Apr 1988 | A |
4898381 | Gordon | Feb 1990 | A |
5011036 | Souza et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5178320 | Bertone | Jan 1993 | A |
5218784 | Pollock | Jun 1993 | A |
5676079 | Depke | Oct 1997 | A |
5829426 | Cloutier | Nov 1998 | A |
5992632 | Karren | Nov 1999 | A |
6003705 | Burguieres, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority or the Declaration for International Application PCT/US2007/004749, dated Jul. 31, 2007, (3 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jul. 31, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/004749, (4 pages). |
International Search Report dated Jul. 31, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/004749, (3 pages). |
Official Action issued in related Eurasian Patent Application No. 200870313; dated Feb. 8, 2010 (4 pages). |
Examiner's Report issued in related Canadian Patent Application No. 2,643,266; Dated Aug. 20, 2010 (2 pages). |
Official Action issued in corresponding Eurasian Patent Application No. 200870313 with English Language translation; Dated Dec. 24, 2010 (2 pages). |
Office Action issued in corresponding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/011095 with English languge communication reporting the same; Dated May 31, 2011 (8 pages). |
Office Action issued in corresponding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/011095 with English languge communication reporting the same; Dated Nov. 8, 2011 (8 pages). |
Office Action issued in corresponding Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2008/011095 with English language communication reporting the same; Dated Oct. 16, 2012 (11 pages). |
Official Action issued in corresponding Eurasian Application No. 200870313/31 dated Apr. 18, 2013 (2 pages). |
Office Action issued in corresponding European Application No. 07751505.4 dated Apr. 23, 2013 (7 pages). |
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding European Application No. 07751505.4; Dated Apr. 3, 2012 (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070210079 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60778787 | Mar 2006 | US |