Certain sensor systems involve nonlinear sensors that utilize a known time-periodic bias signal to excite the sensors to oscillate. A target signal is detected by noting its effect on the sensor's oscillation level-crossing statistics. These sensing techniques are accurately represented via the dynamics of over-damped bi-stable systems; as such, their solutions (in the absence of any driving signals or noise) are those that decay rapidly to one of the stable steady states of the detector system. Yet, for nonlinear sensors to effectively serve as detectors of target signals, the sensors need to be operated as a device that switches between its stable attractors, thereby enabling one to quantify the target signal via its effect on the sensor switching dynamics.
Disclosed herein is an ambient electric field detector comprising: a collection mechanism disposed to generate a current signal in response to the ambient electric field; an input current mirror operatively coupled to the collection mechanism and disposed to amplify and duplicate the current signal to generate a duplicate signal; and an odd number (i) of at least three nonlinear, over-damped, bi-stable elements coupled uni-directionally in a ring such that the ring of elements oscillates, wherein at least one of the elements has a different initial state than the other elements and each element is disposed to receive the duplicate signal.
In another embodiment, the electric field detector may comprise a system for detecting weak electric fields comprising: a collection mechanism disposed to generate a current signal in response to the ambient electric field; an input current mirror operatively coupled to the collection mechanism and disposed to amplify and duplicate the current signal to generate a duplicate signal; an odd number of at least three over-damped, bi-stable elements coupled uni-directionally in a ring such that the ring of elements oscillates. At least one of the elements has a different initial state than the other elements and each element is disposed to receive the duplicate signal. Each element comprises the following components: a) first and second differential pairs of N type-P type-N type (NPN) transistors wherein the second differential pair is cross-coupled; b) an electrical load operatively coupled to the first and second differential pairs; c) first and second nodes Vout+ and Vout−, respectively, operatively coupled between the load and the two differential pairs, wherein the first and second nodes are disposed to be equal in magnitude and out of phase by 180 degrees, and wherein the second node Vout− of each element is disposed to receive the duplicate signal; and d) first and second current mirrors operatively coupled to the first and second differential pairs respectively.
In addition, the electric field detector 10 may be practiced as a method for detecting weak electric fields, comprising the steps of: a) causing a uni-directionally coupled ring of an odd number of at least three over-damped, bi-stable elements to oscillate by adjusting system parameters of the ring; b) receiving an electrical signal on a collection plate; c) transforming the electrical signal into a current signal; d) amplifying and duplicating the current signal with an input current mirror to generate a duplicate signal; e) directing the duplicate signal into each element of the ring; and f) monitoring an output from each element.
Throughout the several views, like elements are referenced using like references. The elements in the figures are not drawn to scale and some dimensions are exaggerated for clarity.
a-6b are plots of output waveforms of an electric field detector with different input current values.
The electric field detector 10 may be fabricated on a microchip. The operating principle of the electric field detector 10 is based on the generation of internal oscillations in the element ring 24, a coupled nonlinear dynamic system that does not normally (i.e., absent the coupling) oscillate. The elements 16 in the element ring 24 are bi-stable in nature (by design). The frequency and other dynamical characteristics of the emergent oscillations depend on the system and target signal characteristics. Hence, the electric field detector 10 can be used to detect and/or quantify very weak dc and time dependent target electric field signals depending on how it is configured for a specific application. For example, the electric field detector 10 can be used to detect the presence of a person based on the static charge on that person's clothing. The electric field detector 10 may also be manufactured on a microchip.
The electric field detector 10 may be employed to detect both dc and ac signals. For a dc signal, the element ring 24 behaves with consistent oscillations where amplitudes are constant, but the frequency changes, and the duty cycle is skewed in proportion to the magnitude of the dc field. The residence time difference (RTD) readout strategy similar to other sensor systems such as the fluxgate magnetometer disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/858,966, “Coupled Fluxgate Magnetometers for DC and Time-Dependent (AC) Target Magnetic Field Detection,” which is incorporated by reference herein, may be used to discern the signal. For low frequency (ac) signal, a power spectral density (PSD) method, which is well known in the discipline, may be used to discern the signal amplitude and frequency.
Coupling an odd number of over-damped, bi-stable elements 16 in a ring 24 uni-directionally can lead to oscillation, given that at least one of the elements 16 has a different initial state than the others and the coupling strength exceeds a certain threshold value, which is known to system users. Here, we are using this concept for constructing an electric field detector 10 for detecting low amplitude and low frequency electric fields.
The following are the equations (or dynamics) for an element ring 24 consisting of odd-numbered, uni-directionally coupled bi-stable elements 16 (N=3):
τ{dot over (x)}1=−gx1−Ic tan h(cc*x3)+Is tan h(cs*x1)+ε
τ{dot over (x)}2=−gx2−Ic tan h(cc*x1)+Is tan h(cs*x2)+ε
τ{dot over (x)}3=−gx3−Ic tan h(cc*x2)+Is tan h(cs*x3)+ε (1)
Where xi for i=1, 2, . . . , N is a state variable usually in the unit of volts, τ, g, Ic, Is, cc and cs are element ring 24 parameters, and ε is an external dc target signal. The element ring 24 will oscillate with ε=0 if the coupling strength, which is a function of the element ring 24 parameters, exceeds a threshold value. The oscillation of each element 16 in the element ring 24 is out of phase by 360/N degrees, where N is the number or elements 16 in ring 24. When ε≠0, the oscillation characteristics of the element ring 24 change as a function of ε. Also, the sensitivity of the element ring 24 is enhanced if the element ring 24 is tuned close to the onset of oscillation (or bifurcation point).
In one embodiment, the electrical field detector 10 utilizes differential pairs of N type-P type-N type (NPN) transistors 26 in each element 16.
I1−I2=Ib tan h(c*(Vi1−Vi2)) (2)
where Ib is the bias (or tail) current of the differential pair 28 and c is a device parameter. The current I1 is the current measured at output node Vout+, and the current I2 is the current measured at output node Vout−.
In the embodiment of element 16 shown in
Using nodal analysis, the current equations at the output nodes Vout+ and Vout− of the nth element 16 are as follows:
where
CL=the load capacitance of the load 38,
R=the resistance of the pair of resistors 46 shown in
cc and cs=device parameters, which are proportional to e/2kT and their values are approximately (7-10)V−1,
Vgp=the voltage at the gate voltage of the PMOS transistors 44 shown in
Ip, which is equal to
the current through one of the PMOS transistors 44,
Vtp=the threshold voltage,
μp=the mobility in the PMOS,
Cox=oxide capacitance,
Wp=width of the PMOS,
Lp=length of the PMOS,
Vin+ and Vin−=the output Vout− and Vout+ from the (n−1) element 16 respectively, and
ε=β*Isig.
Subtracting equation 4 from equation 3, we get the following expression:
CL*{dot over (V)}i=−gVi−Ic tan h(cc*Vi-1)+Is tan h(cs*Vi)−ε (5)
where Vi=Vout+−Vout− is the differential output of the ith element and g=1/R. Note that equation 5 and equation 1 are the same with CL replacing τ, and Vi replacing xi as the state variable.
The electric field detector 10 may be used as an RTD detector as follows. First, the element ring 24 is tuned so that it oscillates prior to receiving the current signal 18. The element ring 24 is more sensitive if it is tuned close to the onset (bifurcation point or threshold) of oscillation. Therefore, the element ring 24 parameters, Ic and Is, need to be set so that the coupling strength, which is a function of these parameters, just exceeds the threshold value for oscillation. Without the presence of a current signal 18, the differential output, Vi, should be symmetric in its duty cycle. That means, during a period of the output, the time above V=0, tp, is about the same as the time below V=0, tn, and the residence time difference, RTD=|tp−tn|, should be very small or close to zero. As the current signal 18 increases, the differential output becomes more asymmetric in its duty cycle, which results in an increase of RTD. At the same time, the frequency of oscillation decreases.
a-6b and 7 are graphs showing the results of the circuit simulation described above. The parameters for the simulation are Ic=200 μA, Is=150 μA, CL=20 nF, R=500 Ohms and β≈150. In
The electric field detector 10 may further comprise a display operatively coupled to the ring of elements 24 to display the oscillations. The electric field detector 10 may be disposed to operate in current mode which means that the signal from the collection mechanism 12 can be input directly into the element ring 24 without additional conversion to voltage via nonlinear capacitors or other media. The electric field detector 10 can be configured to sense different level of input dc and ac signals by tuning system parameters. As mentioned above, the electric field detector 10 can be designed and fabricated in a chip with the standard microchip fabrication technology.
From the above description of the electric field detector 10, it is manifest that various techniques may be used for implementing the concepts of the electric field detector 10 without departing from its scope. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive. It should also be understood that the electric field detector 10 is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of many embodiments without departing from the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/175,262, “Coupled Electric Field Sensors for DC Target Electric Field Detection,” filed 17 Jul. 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,049,486 (Navy Case #97455), hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for its teachings, and referred to hereafter as “the parent application.”
This invention is assigned to the United States Government and is available for licensing for commercial purposes. Licensing and technical inquiries may be directed to the Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, Pacific, Code 72120, San Diego, Calif., 92152; voice (619) 553-2778; email T2@spawar.navy.mil. Reference Navy Case Number 99576.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3760268 | Ruhnke | Sep 1973 | A |
6008642 | Bulsara et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020782 | Albert et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6222423 | Sudjian | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6714469 | Rickes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6785629 | Rickes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7154768 | Chen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7196590 | In et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7339381 | Van Berkel | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7420366 | In et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7528606 | In et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
20090195245 | In et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12175262 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12749338 | US |