Patent Grant
10692645
The present disclosure relates to structures for inductors, and in particular to structures for two or more coupled inductors.
Modern wireless communications standards such as those for Long Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE advanced dictate how signals should be transmitted and received from a wireless communications device. In doing so, these standards place a number of requirements on a wireless communications device, such as output power requirements, spectral masking requirements, and filtering requirements for receive signals that in turn dictate the physical structure of the device. As wireless communications standards continue to advance, these requirements grow in size and complexity. For example, due to the increasing number of bands supported by modern wireless communications standards along with the use of carrier aggregation and multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO), a wireless communications device must include filters that have both high selectivity and high bandwidth. Often, these requirements are difficult to achieve without significantly increasing the size, cost, and complexity of the wireless communications device.
To address the stringent filtering requirements imposed by modern wireless communications standards, acoustic filters have been increasingly used. While acoustic filters often outperform their lumped element counterparts in terms of selectivity and quality factor, the bandwidth of acoustic filters is highly limited due to the relatively low electromechanical coupling that is physically achievable. Accordingly, lumped element filters are still required for high bandwidth applications.
For purposes of illustration,
While only two resonators are shown in each signal path for purposes of illustration, conventional designs have included any number of resonators to provide a desired filter response. To achieve one or more desired performance characteristics (e.g., quality factor, bandwidth, selectivity), it is often desirable to provide coupling (i.e., inductive coupling or mutual inductance) between various ones of the first resonator inductor LR1, the second resonator inductor LR2, the third resonator inductor LR3, and the fourth resonator inductor LR4. Said coupling may be used to obtain a desired bandwidth of the conventional diplexer 10, provide cancellation of signals between signal paths, or otherwise tune the operation of the diplexer. Coupling is expressed by a coupling factor k, also known as a coupling coefficient, which is a value between negative one and one (−1≤k<1) representing both the magnitude and direction of the coupling. The desired level of coupling varies between the different resonator inductors LR. For example, it may be desirable to provide high coupling between some of the resonator inductors LR such that a coupling factor between the resonator inductors LR is greater than 0.4, provide moderate coupling between some of the resonator inductors LR such that a coupling factor between the resonator inductors LR is between 0.1 and 0.4, and provide low or no coupling between other ones of the resonator inductors LR such that a coupling factor between the resonator inductors LR is less than 0.1.
Using conventional inductor structures such as planar inductors and “figure 8” inductors, the aforementioned desired coupling factors between resonator inductors LR are very difficult to achieve. This is due to the fact that conventional inductor structures provide a relatively large magnetic field perpendicular to a plane on which other inductor structures are located with little to no cancellation thereof. Accordingly, coupling between nearby conventional inductor structures is largely dictated by the space between them, often requiring very large distances between inductor structures to obtain moderate, low, or no electromagnetic coupling. This is often impractical or impossible in wireless communications devices where space is highly limited. Further, the performance (e.g., quality factor) of conventional inductor structures is often quite low, making them unsuitable for many applications such as the stringent filtering discussed above.
In light of the above, there is a need for improved inductor structures for providing coupled inductors with desired coupling factors in a minimal form factor and with high performance.
In one embodiment, a coupled inductor structure includes a first three-dimensional folded inductor structure and a second three-dimensional folded inductor structure. The first three-dimensional folded inductor structure and the second three-dimensional folded inductor structure each include a first column, a second column, a third column, and a fourth column, each of which is perpendicular to and runs between a first plane and a second plane. A first terminal plate and a second terminal plate are in the first plane. The first terminal plate is coupled to the first column and the second terminal is coupled to the second column. A first connector plate is in the second plane and runs between the first column and the second column. A second connector plate is in the first plane and runs between the second column and the third column. A third connector plate is in the second plane and runs between the third column and the fourth column. At least a portion of the first three-dimensional folded inductor structure is located within a volume bounded by the second three-dimensional folded inductor structure. By using three-dimensional folded inductor structures and nesting at least a portion of the first three-dimensional folded inductor structure within the volume bounded by the second three-dimensional folded inductor structure, a quality factor of each one of the three-dimensional folded inductor structures may be increased and a variety of coupling factors between the first three-dimensional folded inductor structure and the second three-dimensional folded inductor structure may be achieved while minimizing the volume of the coupled inductor structure.
In one embodiment, at least a portion of the second three-dimensional folded inductor structure may be located within the volume bounded by a third three-dimensional folded inductor structure.
In one embodiment, a coupled inductor structure includes a plurality of three-dimensional folded inductor structures such that a coupling factor between a first pair of the plurality of three-dimensional folded inductor structures is less than 0.05, a coupling factor between a second pair of the plurality of three-dimensional folded inductor structures is greater than 0.3, and a total volume of the coupled inductor structure is less than 0.5 mm3. Providing the various coupling factors between different pairs of three-dimensional folded inductor structures in the coupled inductor structure while maintaining a low volume may allow for the creation of a compact and high performance filter.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first element could be termed a second element, and, similarly, a second element could be termed a first element, without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “on” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly on or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly on” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. Likewise, it will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over” or extending “over” another element, it can be directly over or extend directly over the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over” or extending “directly over” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.
Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/or “including” when used herein specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. It will be further understood that terms used herein should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of this specification and the relevant art and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
In an effort to improve both the performance and achievable coupling factors of conventional inductors, three-dimensional folded inductor structures have recently been introduced.
The first terminal plate 20A, the second terminal plate 20B, and the second connector plate 24B are located in a first plane. The first connector plate 24A and the third connector plate 24C are located in a second plane, which is parallel to the first plane. The first column 22A, the second column 22B, the third column 22C, and the fourth column 22D (referred to collectively as the columns 22) are perpendicular to both the first plane and the second plane and run between them. In some embodiments, the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 is symmetrical about a third plane, which is perpendicular to the first plane and the second plane. Further details of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 are discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 14/450,156 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,899,133, 14/931,689, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,929,458, 14/931,165 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,698,751, and 14/931,720 now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,062,629, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
While not shown to avoid obscuring the drawings, the various parts of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 are supported by an insulating substrate, such as a laminate, a semiconductor substrate, or the like. The first terminal plate 20A and the second terminal plate 20B (referred to collectively as the terminal plates 20), along with the first connector plate 24A, the second connector plate 24B, and the third connector plate 24C (referred to collectively as the connector plates 24) may be provided on different layers of the insulating substrate by well-known metallization processes (e.g., sputtering and lithography). The columns 22 may be provided through different layers of the insulating substrate by well-known via formation processes. In some embodiments, the columns 22 are provided as elongated via columns with a low resistivity, however, the columns 22 may be provided by any number of vias having any shape or size without departing from the principles of the present disclosure.
The three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 provides an inductance between the first terminal plate 20A and the second terminal plate 20B. Due to the orientation of the terminal plates 20, the columns 22, and the connector plates 24, the magnetic field generated by the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 when a current is provided between the first terminal plate 20A and the second terminal plate 20B is substantially confined to an interior of the structure. This is due to the opposing currents and thus magnetic fields generated by parallel elements of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 such as parallel ones of the columns 22 and parallel ones of the connector plates 24, which are destructive outside the boundaries of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 and constructive within the boundaries of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18. Accordingly, the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 may provide a very low or zero coupling factor with other inductor structures that are adjacent thereto.
A width WC of the columns 22 may be increased to adjust both the coupling factor of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 and the quality factor thereof. Increasing the width WC of the columns 22 in turn increases the metal density of the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 without increasing an inductive resistance thereof. However, the width WC of the columns 22 is limited by a required separation between them, which is around 150 microns. A length LC of the connector plates 24 is dependent on the width WC of the columns 22 and the size of the spacing therebetween. By adjusting the width WC of the columns 22 and the length LC of the connector plates, a desired quality factor for the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 can be achieved.
In some embodiments, the width WC of the columns 22, the length LC of the connector plates 24, and the angles at which the columns 22 and thus the edges of the connector plates 24 are provided are chosen such that a uniform current path exists between the terminal plates 20. That is, the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 is provided so that current crowding does not occur between the terminal plates 20, the columns 22, and the connector plates 24. In one embodiment, straightening out the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 into a planar structure results in a continuous metal strip having equal height HC as illustrated in
Notably, the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 shown in
Σαi=(LC1−LC2)×90° (1)
Accordingly, the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 may be provided in any number of polygonal forms. The three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 may also be provided in other shapes, such as a sphere, a pyramid, and the like, some examples of which are detailed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/450,156, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,899,133, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety above. The principles discussed herein apply equally to any of these three-dimensional folded inductor structures 18.
As discussed above, it may be desirable to provide different levels of coupling between inductors in different situations. For example, in the conventional diplexer 10 discussed above it may be desirable to provide a first level of coupling between the first resonator inductor LR1 and the second resonator inductor LR2 and provide a second level of coupling between the first resonator inductor LR1 and the third resonator inductor LR3. As discussed above, the magnetic field generated by the three-dimensional folded inductor structure 18 is confined substantially to the interior thereof. Therefore, only a small amount of coupling can be achieved when different three-dimensional folded inductor structures 18 are provided adjacent to one another as shown in
To provide a higher level of coupling between two three-dimensional folded inductor structures, one three-dimensional folded inductor structure may be nested within the other as shown in
In some embodiments, three or more three-dimensional folded inductor structures 18 may be nested within one another as shown in
The coupling factors achieved by nesting two or more three-dimensional folded inductor structures may be moderate as discussed above. In situations in which a lower amount of coupling or no coupling is desired between nearby three-dimensional folded inductor structures, they may be arranged as shown in
In some embodiments, three or more three-dimensional folded inductor structures may be nested both partially and fully, as illustrated in
While only three three-dimensional folded inductor structures are illustrated above, any number of three-dimensional folded inductor structures may be arranged in the configurations shown above (i.e., fully nested, partially nested, or adjacent to one another with various shapes, sizes, orientations, and positions with respect to one another) or any other configurations, which will be readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, to produce desired coupling factors therebetween. The unique inductor structures, which as discussed above significantly confine a magnetic field generated thereby to an interior of the structure, provide significantly more flexibility in generating a desired coupling factor, as they can be placed much closer together without achieving high coupling (e.g., coupling above 0.3) as occurs between conventional planar and “figure 8” inductors. By fully or partially nesting the three-dimensional folded inductor structures, moderate coupling, low coupling, and very low coupling can be achieved to produce a desired effect and improve filter performance as discussed above. Specifically, a combination of “mouth” coupling, “sidewall” coupling, and “broadside” coupling produce an overall desired coupling, and thus the amount of each of these couplings can be adjusted by changing the shape, size, orientation, and position of three-dimensional folded inductor structures with respect to one another to achieve a desired coupling factor. The coupled three-dimensional folded inductor structures may be provided in a lumped element filter such as a diplexer, a triplexer, or a multiplexer of any order. The coupling factors achievable by the three-dimensional folded inductor structures are not achievable by conventional inductor structures such as planar inductors and “figure 8” inductors without providing a great deal of space therebetween, which as discussed above is highly impractical. Providing the three-dimensional folded inductor structures as discussed herein allows for the achievement of moderate, low, and very low coupling factors while minimizing the space consumed by the structures. Accordingly, the performance of filtering circuitry incorporating the three-dimensional folded inductor structures may be significantly improved without adding to the size thereof.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/312,013, filed Mar. 23, 2016, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3465431 | Henning | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3491318 | Henning et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
| 5517083 | Whitlock | May 1996 | A |
| 6031445 | Marty | Feb 2000 | A |
| 8519814 | Feng | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8803648 | Lo | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9698751 | Leipold et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 20040212038 | Ott | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20060033602 | Mattsson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20080297299 | Yun et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090058589 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261936 | Widjaja et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20110241163 | Liu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20130143381 | Kikukawa | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130187743 | Chang | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140323046 | Asai et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150035625 | Ohtomo | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150035637 | Maxim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150061680 | Leskowitz | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150102887 | Park | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150116950 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150279921 | Lam | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160126613 | Leipold et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160126623 | Maxim et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 05243057 | Sep 1993 | JP |
| 20110114238 | Oct 2011 | KR |
| Entry |
|---|
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,156, dated Mar. 14, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,156, dated Sep. 15, 2016, 11 pages. |
| Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,156, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 12 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/450,156, dated Oct. 11, 2017, 10 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,525, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 10 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170278623 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62312013 | Mar 2016 | US |
