This technology relates to front-end loaders, or the like, being vehicles equipped with a movable articulating mast or arm, to which a bucket can be attached, and relates especially to a coupling-assembly for incorporation into, and for use with, such vehicles.
FIGS. 5A,5B are plan views of the coupler-assembly, shown at different stages of operation.
In
In
The end of the hose 45 is mounted on the arm 23, rather than on the arm-end 25. The hoses have to accommodate the full range of pivoting movement of the arm-end 25 about the pivot-pin 29. The hoses 45 have to accommodate the sliding movement of the slider-block 43 as well, but it is recognized that, by the time the hoses 45 have been arranged to accommodate the full range of pivoting movement, the small extra movement required for the movement of the slider 43 is insignificant. The hose 45 can be guided with respect to the frame of the arm-end, but preferably the end of the hose should not be fixed to the arm-end.
A hydraulic slider-ram 47 is built into the slider-block 43. A piston-rod 50 of the slider-ram 47 is movable relative to the slider-block, and the ram is operable to move the slider-block 43 to and fro, thereby moving the left and right tenons 36 into and out of engagement with the left and right mortises 38. A bolster 52 is fixed to the floor 54 of the frame 27 of the arm-end 25. The piston-rod 50 is clamped to the bolster 52, and thus to the frame 27. The cylinder of the slider-ram 47 is integrated into the slider-block 43. The bolster 52 is suitably buttressed to support the (considerable) forces created by the slider-ram 47.
As shown in
Actually sealing the slider-slots 60 (and the lock-slot 41) might be preferred, but actual sealing is difficult.
As shown in
The side-plates 34 of the frame 27 are formed with slider-slots 60. The tenon 36 is formed with upper 61 and lower slide-surfaces, which fit (with suitable clearance) between the upper and lower walls of the slider-slot 60. The engagement of the slide-surfaces of the tenons 36 with the walls of the slider-slots 60 in the arm-end frame 27 constrain the tenons (and with them, the slider-block 43) against up/down movements, and against roll-mode tipping of the slider-block. However, the engagement of the tenons 36 in the slider-slots 60 does not constrain the slider-block 43 against yaw-mode rotation, nor against side-to-side translational movements.
The presence of the dirt-shields 56,58, as shown in
Neither the engagement of the tenons 36 with the slider-slots 60, nor the engagement of the guide-recess 69 with the guide-rails 67, are effective to fully constrain the slider-block 43 against pitch-mode tipping. That constraint comes from the engagement of the piston-rod 50 of the slider-ram 47 with the bolster 52 of the arm-end frame 27.
The designers should see to it that the (very large) forces arising from the slider-ram 47 are applied in such manner as to avoid giving rise to unwanted tendencies of the slider-block 43 to tip and move in ways that will or might induce heavy contact forces in the sliding guides and components. Thus, the line of action of the slider-ram 47 should be symmetrically between the side-plates 34, and symmetrically between the upper and lower walls of the slider-slots 60. Also, the line of action of the ram should be parallel to the guide surfaces, to minimize forceful (and thus high frictional) contact within the guides.
Designers will understand, from a perusal of the drawings, just how very robustly the slider-block 43 is constrained and guided with respect to the frame 27. During operations, it can be expected that situations will arise that inhibit the smooth functioning of the slides and guides—perhaps due to poor maintenance, presence of caked dirt, and the like. If the arm-end were to be encased in set concrete, the present coupler-assembly might not be able to cope with that—but designers should expect the present design to provide such high rigidity and robustness of the slider-block and its guides that the assembly will cope with anything short of that.
It is important that the tenon be very tight in the mortise, during operation, such that there can be no relative movement between the bucket and the arm-end. The bucket-lug 30, having been snagged, nestles between the cheek-piece 32 and the pivot-pin 29. The required tightness of the bucket relative to the arm-end arises because the bucket-lug can be wedged into the space between the cheek 32 and the pivot-pin 29. The wedge-surface 70 on the tenon 36 engages the mortise 38, and drives the mortise in the upwards direction (in
The force on the tenon 36 (arising from the slider-ram 47) is large, but that force is multiplied by the wedge action of the tenon 36 on the bucket-lug 30, and is multiplied again by the wedge action of the engagement of the bucket-lug between the cheek and the pivot-pin.
Now, oil flows into the sequence-valve 72 and passes into a lock-ram 74. In the sequence valve 72, the rising pressure acts over the (small) area of the valve-seat 76, creating an upward force on the sequence-piston 78. This force is opposed by the sequence-spring 80, which urges the sequence-piston 78 into contact with the valve-seat 76. The sequence-spring force is set at a level such that the hydraulic pressure needed to blow the sequence-piston 78 off the valve-seat 76 is higher than the pressure needed to drive the lock-piston 81 (and with it the lock-bolt 40) against the lock-spring 83. Thus, as the pressure rises, the designers ensure that the lock-bolt 40 is withdrawn (as in
In
The sequence-valve 72 now being open, oil flows into the upper chamber 85 of the slider-ram 47. The lower (annular) chamber 87 being connected to drain, via port-Q, the slider-piston 50 moves downwards—or rather, the slider-block 43 starts to move upwards. The tenons 36 being integrated into the slider-block 43, the left and right tenons 36 now disengage from the left and right mortises 38. In
The bucket 20 having been detached, probably the driver will now wish to engage another accessory, and so the driver maintains the slider in its withdrawn position, by maintaining the hydraulic pressure in the port-P and the drain in port-Q. The next accessory (again referred to herein as a bucket) is now attached, in the manner as shown in
In
It may be noted that the end of the lock-bolt 40 protrudes out from the side-plate 34, when the lock is locked. Thus, it is an easy matter to ensure that the protruding end of the lock-bolt 40 is visible to the driver of the vehicle. The protruding end can be painted in a contrasting colour, to increase the driver's confidence that the lock-bolt 40 is correctly engaged. The driver can remain seated, and does not have to get down to carry our some such operation as removing a locking safety pin.
If the hydraulic pressure should fail during operation, generally the driver will be immediately aware of the problem, and will cease operations. Now, the hydraulic-pressure having disappeared, the tenons 36 will tend to detach from the mortises 38, or at any rate a clearance will open up between the tenons and the mortises. As mentioned, it is important for safety reasons that the bucket 20 cannot actually detach and from the arm-end 25, and fall to the ground, at such a time. The engagement of the lock-bolt 40 into the lock-slot 41 in the side-plate 34 ensures that the bucket 20 indeed cannot fall off the arm-end 25. Indeed, the bucket remains locked to the arm-end until hydraulic pressure is restored—whereupon the operations of
It may be noted that, even though the arm-end might be covered with e.g frozen mud, large forces can be brought to bear to move the slider-block 43, in either direction. The slider-block, with all the elements integrated thereinto, is chunky and hugely robust. The slide-guides, too, are almost as robust. The present guided slider may be contrasted with e.g. pivoting levers, from the standpoint of robustness, and it may be noted that a pivoting-lever arrangement that is as robust as the present guided slider (even if such could be achieved) would likely be much more expensive. There is virtually no danger that, should the slide-ways become choked with accumulated solid debris, the slider and its guides might not be able to support even the highest forces that might be encountered as the driver seeks to get the slider moving by applying hydraulic pressure. It cannot be said that the slider and the guides are indestructible, but it can be said that the chances of the slider and the arm-end being damaged by forces arising from misapplication of hydraulic pressure in the rams, is virtually zero.
The lock-bolt 40 operates on only one of the left and right side-plates 34, but it could be arranged that the lock-ram 74 is double-ended, and operates a lock-bolt also on the other side-plate. However, a single lock-bolt is considered adequately safe.
Designers do not rule out the use of springs to keep the tenons tightly engaged with the mortises and of using hydraulic pressure to release the springs—following the common traditional fail-safe approach. However, in that case, the spring-force required would be so high, and the distance travelled by the springs would be so large, that the springs and their mountings would be expensive; not only that, but users of materials-handling equipment would likely balk at the presence of the dangerously large amounts of potential energy necessarily stored in such springs.
Rather, in the present case, designers prefer to use maintained hydraulic pressure, as described, as the means for ensuring that the tenons remain adequately-tightly engaged in the mortises during operations. Hydraulic rams can apply the required large forces, controllably and safely. However, using hydraulic pressure is not inherently fail-safe.
It may be noted that, in many systems where fail-safe operation is required, the force that is needed to ensure safety, in the event of failure, is the maximum force that ever arises in the system. In the present case, the force needed to ensure safety is much smaller than the normal operating forces. Thus, the use of springs to perform the safety function, in the manner as indicated in
One of the benefits of the coupler-assembly as described herein is that the operator is faced with just one single operation to couple the bucket. When releasing the bucket, the lock-bolt is automatically sequenced to withdraw before the slider-block can start to move. The operator does not have to remember to unlock the bolt before making the slider move.
As illustrated, the slider-block itself is monolithic, i.e is formed from a single piece of material.
Some of the terms used herein are intended to be construed as follows. The slider-assembly includes components that are rigidly integrated into the slider-block, as well as the slider-block itself. The hydraulic ram-cylinder of the slider-ram is formed directly in the block of material that is the slider-block, in the assemblies as illustrated herein, but designers might prefer to use a separately-manufactured ram-cylinder, and e.g to bolt that separate ram-cylinder rigidly to the slider-block. Similarly, the tenon or tenons can be manufactured separately from the slider-block. The slider-assembly performs operational functions in the same manner whether the cylinder and the tenon(s) are monolithic with or separate from the slider-block.
In the relationship of a mortise and tenon as referred to herein, the tenon is a component of the slider and the mortise is a component of the bucket-lug. Included also is the opposite relationship, where these components are reversed.
It is important that the coupler-assembly should hold the bucket very tightly to the frame of the arm-end—even during the abuse that is inevitably encountered by the bucket of a front-end loader. It might be considered that, although, of course, the bucket must be prevented from actually detaching accidentally from the arm, but still, the bucket could be allowed to move, somewhat, relative to the arm-end. That is to say: it might be considered that, so long as the bucket cannot actually fall off, it does not matter if the bucket can “rattle” relative to the arm-end.
However, it is recognized that any clearance at all between the bucket-lugs and the arm-end is contra-indicated. The bucket-lugs should be pressed tight against/into the arm-end throughout operation. In order for the coupling between the bucket-lugs and the arm-end frame to remain tight even under abusive conditions, the coupling should be very tight indeed under no-load conditions. Also, the tightness should be automatic, i.e the design of the coupler-assembly should be such that even a casual and inept driver should not be able to start work using the bucket until the bucket is tight.
The slider-ram therefore should exert a considerable force, and should maintain that force throughout operation. Plus, it is advantageous if the force from the slider-ram can be multiplied in such manner as to magnify that attachment force. In the coupler-assembly as shown, the shape of the bucket-lug is such that the lug becomes wedged in the space between the arm-end pivot-pin and the cheek-piece, during snagging of the bucket. The tightness of the attachment depends mainly on that wedge-engagement being held tightly. Thus, the frame of the arm-end should be rotated about the pivot-pin in such manner as to wedge the bucket-lug more tightly into that space.
Furthermore, the contact-surfaces of the tenon and the mortise preferably should be angled in such manner that, when the slider-ram forces those two surfaces into contact, that contact also forcefully causes the arm-end to rotate about the pivot-pin, thus driving the bucket-lug more deeply into the arm-end frame.
Regarding the out-and-back sliding of the block relative to the frame, as constrained by the guided-rails and the recess in the slider-block, the designers will see to it that there is a running clearance between the rails and the recess, to permit free sliding. This clearance also permits the block to undergo a small degree of yaw-mode rotation relative to the frame. This is advantageous, in that such rotation permits the slider-block to rotate in the yaw-mode until the contact force between the left tenon and mortise is equal to the contact force between the right tenon and mortise. Over time, there will inevitably be some wear between the mortise and tenon contact-surfaces, and such wear is likely to be uneven, left to right—whereby equalization between the left and right tenons might not be assured unless the block were permitted to rotate slightly in the yaw-mode.
The hydraulic circuit requires two fluid lines (P,Q) to connect the coupler-assembly to the source of hydraulic pressure ion the vehicle. When line Q is pressurized, the slider is urged towards it engaged position; the lock-ram is not pressurized, so the lock-spring urges the lock-bolt to its locked position. When line P is pressurized, first the lock-ram is pressurized and then the slider-ram is pressurized to urge the slider to it dis-engaged position. No other control is required of the driver, other than to switch the pressure either to line P or to line Q.
The scope of the patent protection sought herein is defined by the accompanying claims. The apparatuses and procedures shown in the accompanying drawings and described herein are examples.
Terms of orientation (e.g “up/down”, “left/right”, and the like) when used herein are intended to be construed as follows. The terms being applied to a device, that device is distinguished by the terms of orientation only if there is not one single orientation into which the device, or an image (including a mirror image) of the device, could be placed, in which the terms could be applied consistently.
Terms used herein, such as “cylindrical”, “vertical”, and the like, which define respective theoretical constructs, are intended to be construed according to the purposive construction.
Herein, “rigid” means, rigid for the purposes of practical operation of the coupler-assembly. That is to say: any difference between actual rigidity and theoretically-absolute rigidity is insignificant from the standpoint of practical operation of the coupler-assembly.
A reference to a component being “integrated into” another component means, herein, that the two components are either formed monolithically from one common piece of material, or, if formed separately, are fixed together so firmly and rigidly as to be functionally and operationally equivalent to having been formed monolithically. Two components should not be regarded as “integrated”, in this sense, if the components can undergo relative movement, during operation.
The scope of the patent protection sought herein is defined by the accompanying claims. The apparatuses and procedures shown in the accompanying drawings and described herein are examples.
The numerals that appear in the accompanying drawings are listed as:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5634736 | Brown et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
6305106 | McLellan | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7654019 | Yeager et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7654787 | Sonerud | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7882898 | Vering et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
8602676 | Stollery | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20030231946 | Heiple | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0058058 | Aug 1982 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140321956 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |