Couplers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6168345
  • Patent Number
    6,168,345
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 3, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 2, 2001
    24 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Kim; Harry C.
    Agents
    • Davis and Bujold
Abstract
A right-angle scaffold coupler comprises two jaw assemblies (10A, 10B) each with jaws formed by a closure-plate (12) hinged to a common chassis (11), and having a hand lever (14) hinged (at 21) to the plate (12) with a spirally-coiled spring (25 FIG. 4) as hinge-pin within interleaved finger-lugs (26, 27). A hook-member (15) hinged to the lever (14) engages a lip (19) of the chassis (11) so that depression of the lever (14) pulls the plate (12) towards the chassis (11) in closing the jaws onto a scaffolding tube (13) and clamping to it by over-center action. The spring (25) coils up more tightly during the over-center action allowing resilient displacement between the lugs (26, 27) of hinge (21) to accommodate variations in tube circumference. The jaw surface (17) of the chassis (11) subtends more than 180 degrees to snap fit with the tube (13).
Description




This invention relates to couplers and especially, but not exclusively to scaffold couplers, of a kind including at least one pair of jaws that involves an over-centre mechanism for clamping the jaws onto a respective tube or other element.




Scaffold couplers of the above-specified kind are known from Applicant's GB-A-2240135, and couplers of this known form have been found to function very satisfactorily in meeting established scaffolding performance and safety standards. However, such standards require large external loads to be withstood by the coupler throughout a significantly-wide tolerance range for the circumference of the clamped tube. Although the known form of coupler has a capacity to adapt to tube circumference and shape, it is one of the objects of the present invention to provide a coupler of improved form in this respect.




According to the present invention there is provided a coupler of said above-specified kind, wherein the over-centre mechanism involves two members that are hinged together via a coiled spring as hinge-pin such as to enable resilient displacement between the two members at the hinge within the over-centre action.




Although the invention is especially applicable to scaffold couplers it may be applied to couplers of other forms where clamping action is required between a pair of jaws.




The coiled spring may be of spirally-coiled steel or other resilient strip to have a substantially cylindrical form. More especially, the coiled spring may have the characteristic that it coils up resiliently more tightly within itself under the load applied transversely of it within the hinge, such that the reduction of its diameter as it becomes more tightly coiled is substantially linearly related to the magnitude of the load until it acts as a solid shear pin.




The two members may have finger-lugs that are interleaved with one another at the hinge. Transverse bores of the respective finger-lugs may be substantially aligned with one another, and the coiled spring may then extend axially through the aligned bores as hinge-pin.




The over-centre mechanism may involve a lever that is angularly displaceable for actuating the mechanism to close and clamp the jaws onto said element, means for establishing a first effective hinge connection with the actuating lever, means for establishing a second effective hinge connection between the lever and one of the jaws via the coiled spring as hinge-pin, and means for establishing a third effective hinge connection with the other jaw, displacement of the said lever for actuating the mechanism as aforesaid causing the second hinge connection to be moved into alignment with the first and third hinge connections against a resilient bias that is at least partly due to the coiled spring, and to snap through such alignment and be retained there with the jaws clamped onto said element.




The mechanism as specified in the preceding paragraph may take a form in which the third effective hinge connection is established by a selectively disengageable connection between the said other jaw and a linking member that is hinged by the said first hinge connection to the actuating lever, and in which the said displacement of the actuating lever acts via the said disengageable connection to pull the two jaws towards one another so as to close and clamp them more tightly onto said element as said second hinge connection moves into said alignment.




The jaws may be defined in two separate, jaw-defining parts that are hinged directly together by means of a discrete hinge connection, but alternatively may be defined in a unitary structure in which relative movement of the jaws is achieved by flexing within that structure. Each jaw may be of a shape to conform to the surface of the element clamped, over a substantial part of that surface. Moreover, one of the jaws may be defined by a clamping surface that subtends more than 180 degrees and involves resilience to enable that jaw to be snapped onto the element for initial retention prior to actuation of the lever mechanism to close the jaws and effect clamping. Grip of the jaws may be enhanced by providing them with friction surfacing.




The coupler may involve two pairs of jaws, and in this respect the two pairs of jaws may have a fixed orientation with respect to one another for engaging and clamping to respective tubes or other elements that cross one another and are to be held together by the coupler at a fixed angle, for example at right angles, to one another. Alternatively, the two pairs of jaws may be mounted in the coupler for swivelling relative one to the other; the swivelling may be restricted to a specific angular range, or may be unrestricted. Furthermore, the two pairs of jaws may be aligned side by side with one another to provide a sleeve coupler for coupling tubes or other elements together end to end.




According to a feature of the present invention there is provided a scaffold coupler wherein a base member and a closure member have opposed cylindrically-concave surfaces to define a pair of jaws for gripping a tube or other scaffolding element, the closure member being hinged to the base member for movement of the closure member towards the base member in closing the jaws upon said element, and wherein the coupler includes an over-centre lever mechanism that is actuable to close and clamp the jaws onto said element and involves a hand lever that is hinged to the closure member via a hinge-pin formed by a coiled spring, and a hook member that is hinged to the hand lever and is adapted to engage with a lip or other projection on the base member, the mechanism being actuated to bring about clamping by turning the hand lever about its hinge with the closure member, while the hook member is engaged with the lip or other projection.











A scaffold coupler in accordance with the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a perspective view of the scaffold coupler according to the present invention, the scaffold coupler being shown with one of its two identical jaw assemblies closed and the other open;





FIG. 2

is a side view of one of the two identical jaw assemblies of the scaffold coupler of

FIG. 1

, illustrating a stage in the actuation of the assembly to effect clamping to a scaffolding tube;





FIG. 3

is a sectional side view of the jaw assembly of

FIG. 2

following completion of the clamping action on the scaffolding tube;





FIG. 4

is a perspective view of a hinge of the jaw assembly of

FIGS. 2 and 3

, showing its hinge-pin withdrawn; and





FIG. 5

is a sectional side view corresponding to that of

FIG. 3

in circumstances in which the scaffolding tube is of larger circumference than that represented in FIG.


3


.











Referring to

FIG. 1

, the scaffold coupler involves two identical jaw assemblies


10


; in FIG.


1


and where distinction is made between the two assemblies


10


, one (shown closed in

FIG. 1

) is identified as


10


A and the other (shown open in

FIG. 1

) is identified as


10


B. The two assemblies


10


, which are formed orthogonally and back-to-back with one another, have a common, unitary base-member or chassis


11


of injection-moulded plastics material. Each jaw assembly


10


has an injection-moulded plastics closure-plate


12


that is hinged to the chassis


11


so as to define with the chassis


11


a pair of jaws for receiving and clamping to an individual scaffolding tube


13


; the scaffolding tubes individual to the assemblies


10


A and


10


B are indicated in broken line as


13


A and


13


B respectively, in FIG.


1


. The clamping action in each assembly


10


is effected by means of an over-centre mechanism.




Referring now also to

FIG. 2

(which shows the assembly


10


B), the over-centre mechanism of each assembly


10


is formed in conjunction with the closure-plate


12


by an injection-moulded plastics hand-lever


14


that is hinged to the plate


12


, and a metal linking or hook-member


15


that is hinged to the lever


14


. The hand-lever


14


and hook-member


15


are used to close the plate


12


onto the scaffolding tube


13


, and, by means of the over-centre action, to pull and hold the plate


12


tightly clamped onto the tube


13


received within the chassis


11


(the assembly


10


A is shown in this closed condition in FIG.


1


).




The chassis


11


and closure-plate


12


of each assembly


10


are interconnected by a cylindrical butt-hinge


16


and have co-operating cylindrically-concave jaw surfaces


17


and


18


, respectively. The surfaces


17


and


18


, which are both coated with mineral to have a frictional coefficient (μ) within the range 0.6 to 0.8, are dimensioned to conform closely to the outer surface of the scaffolding tube


13


throughout substantially the whole of the tube circumference. The jaw surface


17


is of longer arc-length than the surface


18


to the extent that it subtends an angle slightly more than 180 degrees between a turned-back lip


19


at one extreme and the hinge


16


at the other. This ensures that the chassis


11


, which has resilience, is a snap-fit with the scaffolding tube


13


.




The snap-fit feature has the particular advantage of enabling the chassis


11


to be engaged with the scaffolding tube


13


as a preliminary to closure of the plate


12


onto it. For example, the assembly


10


A can be engaged with the vertical tube


13


A, simply by snapping the chassis


11


onto the tube


13


A, without danger of the coupler falling off before the closure-plate


12


of the assembly


10


A has been closed and clamping to the tube


13


A is completed (ie before the condition illustrated in

FIG. 1

is reached). When, on the other hand, a horizontal scaffolding tube, for example the tube


13


B is then offered up for clamping to the other jaw assembly, assembly


10


B, it can be readily snapped into the member


11


for light retention as a preliminary to clamping. Moreover, when the closure-plate


12


is in its fully-open position (as illustrated in the case of the assembly


10


B in FIG.


1


), it rests on a projecting tongue


20


at the hinge


16


(

FIG. 2

) and thereby presents a ledge-support on which the horizontal scaffolding tube


13


B can be laid prior to being snapped into the chassis


11


for clamping to be completed.




The way in which clamping is effected in each assembly


10


will be described in relation to the jaw assembly


10


B from the fully-open condition shown in

FIG. 1

, with the tube


13


B held resiliently within the member


11


.




In the latter regard, the hand-lever


14


of the assembly


10


B is first lifted up to turn it about its hinge


21


with the plate


12


. Lifting of the lever


14


also lifts the plate


12


about the hinge


16


to close it onto the tube


13


B. This brings the hook-member


15


up to the turned-back lip


19


and allows it to be engaged fully over the lip


19


to the condition illustrated in

FIG. 2

; the hook-member


15


can be turned about its hinge


22


located on the back of the lever


14


, to facilitate the engagement. Once the hook-member


15


has been engaged with the lip


19


, the lever


14


is depressed by hand about the hinge


21


towards the plate


12


. As the lever


14


continues to be depressed in this way, the closure-plate


12


is pulled about the hinge


16


progressively harder onto the tube


13


B.




Engagement of the hook-member


15


over the lip


19


establishes what is in effect a further, disconnectable hinge


23


for the member


15


, and depression of the lever


14


moves the hinge


21


towards alignment with the two hinges


22


and


23


. As the lever


14


is depressed further, the hinge


21


finally moves into alignment and causes the lever mechanism formed by the interconnected “levers”


12


,


14


and


15


, to snap “over centre” into the condition, illustrated in FIG.


3


. In this condition the plate


12


is held on the tube


13


B without the need for continued hand pressure on the lever


14


.




The forced movement of the lever


14


to bring the hinge


21


into alignment with the hinges


22


and


23


, increases clamping pressure of the jaw surfaces


17


and


18


on the tube


13


B, as tension in the hook-member


15


increases.




The tension increases progressively as the force of depression on the lever


14


is increased, and causes a small degree of elastic deformation in the hook-member


15


sufficient to enable the hinge


21


to be brought onto the “centre” of alignment with the hinges


22


and


23


. As the hinge


21


passes, or snaps, through this “centre” against the resilience of the hook-member


15


, the tension relaxes and deformation in the assembly


10


B reduces elastically. Since force is now required to be applied in the opposite direction to take the hinge


21


back through the “centre”, the mechanism retains the “over-centre” position, with the tube


13


B remaining clamped firmly between the jaw surfaces


17


and


18


, when hand pressure on the lever


14


is removed. The location of the lever


14


close in to the closure-plate


12


provides a readily-visible (even from a distance) indication of the clamped condition of the assembly.




The hook-member


15


remains in tension while the over-centre mechanism is in the actuated condition clamping the jaw surfaces


17


and


18


onto the tube


13


B. In this regard, the length of the member


15


is chosen to be slightly less than that required untensioned to accommodate the tube


13


B in the jaw surfaces


17


and


18


with the mechanism actuated. The tube


13


B is thus tightly squeezed between the surfaces


17


and


18


as the closure-plate


12


continues to be pulled tightly towards the lip


19


.




Release of the assembly from the tube


13


B is achieved simply by lifting the lever


14


away from the plate


12


; a pocket


24


(

FIG. 3

) is moulded into the lever


14


to facilitate insertion of fingers of the hand for this purpose (according to a modification the lever


14


may be extended slightly so as to enable thumb pressure to be exerted to the same end). Lifting of the lever


14


moves the hinge


21


back through the alignment “centre” of the hinges


22


and


23


against the resilience of the member


15


, and hinges the closure-plate


12


away from the tube


13


B, releasing the clamping pressure. Once the plate


12


is away from the tube


13


B and the hook-member


14


released from the lip


19


, the chassis


11


and the tube


13


B can be snapped apart. The assembly can then be clamped elsewhere to the tube


13


B, or to some other tube, simply by snapping the chassis


11


on, engaging the hook-member


14


with the lip


19


again, and depressing the lever


14


to actuate the over-centre mechanism to clamp the jaw assembly


10


B tightly onto the tube.




To the extent the scaffold coupler has so far been described with reference to

FIGS. 1

to


3


, it conforms generally to the principles of construction described in GB-A-2240135. In this regard, and according to an important feature, each jaw assembly


10


exerts clamping pressure on the engaged tube


13


around substantially the whole of the tube-circumference even though the tube


13


may not be truly round. The plate


12


is in particular pulled in to conform to the tube surface in spite of any ovality of the tube


13


. In this latter respect, scaffolding tubes are in general of uniform circumference independently of ovality, and the jaws of the assembly, because of their extended arcuate length, tend to adapt to the tube shape resiliently. However, the performance and safety standards set for scaffold couplers require large loads to be withstood by the coupler irrespective of the circumference of the clamped-tube within a significantly-wide tolerance range.




Although the flexibility and curved shaping of the metal hook-member


15


provides for a degree of inherent compensation for variation of tube circumference, in load-bearing ability, it has been found that this may not always be adequate to accommodate the extremes of the range of tolerance set in certain performance and safety requirements. The scaffold coupler of

FIGS. 1

to


3


incorporates a modification according to the present invention to enable such performance and safety requirements to be met.




In the latter regard and referring now also to

FIG. 4

, the hinge


21


between the lever


14


and the closure-plate


12


, involves a substantially cylindrical spring


25


that is formed by a spirally-coiled steel strip. The hinge


21


is formed as a butt-hinge with spaced finger-lugs


26


of the plate


12


interleaving spaced finger-lugs


27


of the lever


14


, and with the coiled spring


25


acting as the hinge-pin. The spring


25


is inserted, and is a close interference fit within, transverse bores


28


and


29


of the lugs


26


and


27


respectively. The bores


29


of the lugs


27


at either end of the hinge


21


are closed—one is blind and the other is fitted with a cap (not shown)—to ensure positive retention of the spring


25


.




The spring


25


acts to hold the lugs


26


and


27


with their bores


28


and


29


in alignment with one another, but coils up resiliently within itself under force applied to it transversely of its length. Thus, when, with the hook-member


15


engaged over the lip


19


, the lever


14


is depressed to pull the closure-plate


12


about the hinge


16


onto the tube


13


B, the loading imposed on the spring


25


within the hinge


21


causes it to become more tightly coiled. This allows for slight misalignment between the bores


28


and


29


and, consequently, relative displacement between the lugs


26


of the plate


12


and the lugs


27


of the lever


14


. As soon as the load is relaxed, the spring


25


returns to its normal, coiled condition resiliently.




The characteristic of the spring


25


is such that the reduction of its diameter as it becomes more tightly coiled under load is substantially linearly related to the magnitude of the imposed load until it can coil-up no further, whereupon it acts as a solid shear pin; the maximum and minimum diameters of the spring


25


are, for example, 10 mm and 7 mm respectively. This characteristic is utilised in the scaffold coupler according to the invention to accommodate for variation of, for example, up to 3 mm in circumference of scaffolding tube, while maintaining good safety and load-bearing performance of the coupler. The way the coupler functions to accommodate such a range of variation of circumference will be described with reference to

FIGS. 3 and 5

;

FIG. 3

illustrates the case in which the tube


13


B has the minimum circumference, and

FIG. 5

the case in which it has the maximum, within the tolerance range.




Referring to

FIG. 3

, depression of the lever


14


to move the hinge


21


onto and through the “centre” of alignment with the hinges


22


and


23


relies on a small degree of elastic deformation of the hook-member


15


. However, such deformation is inadequate in itself to allow the over-centre action to take place, but the load imposed at the hinge


21


causes the spring


25


to coil up slightly so as to enable a small relative displacement to take place resiliently between the lugs


26


and


27


. The closure-plate


12


is pushed hard onto the tube


13


B as the lever


14


is depressed and the coiling-up of the spring


25


under the force exerted on the lever


14


enables the lugs


27


of the lever


14


to pull back away slightly from the lugs


26


to facilitate full depression of the lever


14


in completion of the over-centre action.




In the case illustrated in

FIG. 5

, where the circumference of the tube


13


B is a maximum, the spring


25


coils up further to become substantially solid under the increased force which of necessity in this instance, is exerted by hand on the lever


14


. This allows a larger degree of pull back of the lugs


27


from the lugs


26


to facilitate completion in this case of the required over-centre action.




The characteristic of the spring


25


to coil up tightly and become substantially solid under increasing force is of advantage in maintaining the integrity of the coupler if the normal working load is exceeded. While the external load imposed on, for example, the assembly


10


A of

FIG. 1

(and arising from the support given to the coupler itself and the load on the tube


13


B) remains within the normal working range, the coupler is held firm by the frictional grip that arises from the clamping pressure of the assembly


10


A on the tube


13


A. If, however, the imposed load exceeds the normal working range, the coupler tends to tilt slightly and jam by shackle action on the tube


13


A. The force in consequence applied to the spring


25


causes it to coil up to the form of a solid shear pin if it is not already in that condition. This ensures integrity of the coupler in holding firm against the externally-applied load.




The coupler includes a further feature in the provision of a small projection


30


(

FIGS. 2 and 4

) on the lugs


27


at either end of the hinge


21


. The projection


30


is of especial effect when the jaw assembly


10


is to be closed with the hook-member


15


over the lip


19


, without engagement with a tube. In this case the closure-plate


12


is not flexed outwardly during closing of the jaw assembly


10


as it is when urged against the surface of an engaged tube. As a consequence, its free end


31


lies in the path of the projection


30


as the lever


14


turns about the hinge


21


when depressed.




The end


31


is partially bevelled so that when the projection


30


abuts it, continued depression of the lever


14


causes the lever


14


to be lifted slightly against the action of the spring


25


. This enables the projection


30


to pass over the end


31


and complete closure of the jaw assembly


10


with a resilient-detent action between the lever


14


and plate


12


. Thus, even when not in use the assembly is retained positively closed with the hook-member


15


engaged over the lip


19


.



Claims
  • 1. In a coupler in which a pair of jaws are closable onto a tube or other element to establish a clamped intercoupling therewith under selective actuation of an over-center mechanism, and the over-center mechanism is coupled to one of the jaws via a hinge-pin, the improvement wherein the hinge-pin is a coiled spring.
  • 2. The coupler according to claim 1 wherein the coiled spring is of a substantially cylindrical form and comprises spirally-coiled resilient strip.
  • 3. The coupler according to claim 2 wherein the coiled strip responds to load applied transversely of the hinge-pin to coil up resiliently more tightly within itself.
  • 4. The coupler according to claim 1 wherein the over-center mechanism includes finger-lugs and said one jaw has finger-lugs interleaved with the finger-lugs of the over-center mechanism, the finger-lugs of said mechanism and said one jaw having respective transverse bores that are substantially aligned with one another when the finger-lugs are interleaved as aforesaid, and wherein the coiled spring extends axially through the aligned bores.
  • 5. A coupler for clamping to a tube or other element, comprising: jaw means defining a pair of jaws that are closable onto said element to establish a clamped intercoupling therewith; an over-center mechanism that is selectively actuable to close and clamp the jaws onto said element, the over-center mechanism including means providing resilient bias to oppose said actuation, and an actuating lever that is angularly displaceable for actuating the mechanism to close and clamp the jaws onto said element against said bias; means for establishing a first effective hinge connection with the actuating lever; means including a hinge-pin for establishing a second effective hinge connection between the lever and one of the jaws, said hinge-pin comprising a coiled spring affording resilience within said second hinge connection; and means for establishing a third effective hinge connection with the other jaw; displacement of the actuating lever for actuating the mechanism as aforesaid causing the second hinge connection to be moved into alignment with the first and third hinge connections and to snap resiliently through such alignment for retention therewith the jaws clamped onto said element.
  • 6. The coupler according to claim 5 including a linking member that is hinged by said first hinge connection to the actuating lever, and wherein the third effective hinge connection comprises a selectively disengageable connection between the linking member and said other jaw, said displacement of the actuating lever acting via said disengageable connection to pull the two jaws towards one another so as to close and clamp them more tightly onto said element as said second hinge connection moves into said alignment.
  • 7. A coupler for clamping to a tube or other element, comprising: jaw means defining a pair of jaws that are closable onto said element to establish a clamped intercoupling therewith; and an over-center mechanism that is selectively actuable to close and clamp the jaws onto said element, said over-center mechanism comprising means providing a resilient bias opposing actuating of the mechanism, an actuating lever, and means hingedly mounting the lever on one of the jaws for angular displacement relative to said one jaw to actuate the over-center mechanism against the resilient bias, and wherein said means hingedly mounting the lever includes a hinge-pin that comprises a coiled spring.
  • 8. The coupler according to claim 7 wherein the jaws are defined in two separate, jaw-defining parts that are hinged together.
  • 9. The coupler according to claim 7 wherein a first of the jaws has a recessed part to define a surface for clamping abutment with said element, and said surface subtends more than 180 degrees to provide a partially-closed mouth to said recessed part, said first jaw having resilience to enable said mouth to be snapped onto the element for initial retention prior to actuation of the over-center mechanism to close the jaws and effect clamping.
  • 10. The coupler according to claim 7 including a further pair of jaws, the two pairs of jaws having a fixed orientation with respect to one another for clamping to respective tubes or other elements to hold those elements at a fixed angle to one another.
  • 11. A scaffold coupler for clamping to a tube or other scaffolding element, comprising a base member, a closure member hinged to the base member, said base member and closure member having opposed cylindrically-concave surfaces to define a pair of jaws for gripping a tube or other scaffolding element, the closure member being hinged to the base member as aforesaid for movement of the closure member towards the base member in closing the jaws upon said element, an over-center lever mechanism that is actuable to close and clamp the jaws onto said element, said mechanism including a hand lever, a hinge-pin comprising a coiled spring for hinging the lever to the closure member, and a hook member that is hinged to the hand lever, the hook member being selectively engageable with the base member such that turning of the hand lever on its hinging to the closure member while the hook member is engaged with the base member actuates the over-center mechanism.
  • 12. The scaffold coupler according to claim 11 wherein the coiled spring comprises spirally-coiled resilient strip to coil up resiliently more tightly within itself under load applied transversely of said hinge-pin within said hinging of the lever to the closure member.
  • 13. The scaffold coupler according to claim 11 wherein the hand lever includes finger-lugs, and the closure member includes finger-lugs that are interleaved with the finger-lugs of the hand lever, the finger-lugs of the hand lever and the closure member having respective transverse bores that are substantially aligned with one another when the finger-lugs are interleaved as aforesaid, and wherein the coiled spring extends axially through the aligned bores.
  • 14. In a coupler in which a pair of jaws are closable onto a tube or other element to establish a clamped intercoupling therewith under selective actuation of an over-center mechanism, and the over-center mechanism is coupled to one of the jaws via a hinge-pin, the improvement wherein:(a) the hinge-pin is a coiled spring; (b) the coiled spring is of a substantially cylindrical form and comprises spirally-coiled resilient strip; (c) the coiled strip responds to load applied transversely of the hinge-pin to coil up resiliently more tightly within itself; and (d) the coiled strip responds to said load according to a characteristic by which the diameter of the hinge-pin reduces substantially linearly with an increase in magnitude of the load until the strip is so tightly coiled the strip acts as a solid shear pin.
  • 15. A scaffold coupler for clamping to a tube or other scaffolding element, comprising a base member, a closure member hinged to the base member, said base member and closure member having opposed cylindrically-concave surfaces to define a pair of jaws for gripping a tube or other scaffolding element, the closure member being hinged to the base member as aforesaid for movement of the closure member towards the base member in closing the jaws upon said element, an over-center lever mechanism that is actuable to close and clamp the jaws onto said element, said mechanism including a hand lever, a hinge-pin comprising a coiled spring for hinging the lever to the closure member, and a hook member that is hinged to the hand lever, the hook member being selectively engageable with the base member such that turning of the hand lever on its hinging to the closure member while the hook member is engaged with the base member actuates the over-center mechanism,wherein the coiled spring comprises spirally-coiled resilient strip to coil up resiliently more tightly within itself under load applied transversely of said hinge-pin within said hinging of the lever to the closure member, and the coiled strip responds to said load according to a characteristic by which the diameter of the hinge-pin reduces substantially linearly, with an increase in magnitude of the load, until the strip is so tightly coiled the strip acts as a solid shear pin.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9609642 May 1996 GB
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 102e Date 371c Date
PCT/GB97/01246 WO 00 11/3/1998 11/3/1998
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO97/43506 11/20/1997 WO A
US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
741626 Chesney Oct 1903
1062437 Carlson May 1913
1859360 Freer May 1932
2752174 Frost Jun 1956
2967325 Herzfeld Jan 1961
3113791 Frost et al. Dec 1963
3702491 Pelletiere Nov 1972
3999825 Cannon Dec 1976
4438958 De Cenzo Mar 1984
4639979 Polson Feb 1987
4660870 Donley Apr 1987
4784514 Pantev Nov 1988
4817897 Kreusel Apr 1989
5259690 Legge Nov 1993
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
161789 Oct 1953 AU
258529 Apr 1947 CH
413 320 May 1966 CH
35290 Oct 1885 DE
37 33 126 A1 Apr 1939 DE
806 051 Jul 1949 DE
821 740 Jul 1949 DE
621163 Sep 1926 FR
846381 Oct 1938 FR
957134 Dec 1947 FR
998362 Oct 1949 FR
1000733 Nov 1949 FR
1238931 Jul 1959 FR
1397747 Jun 1964 FR
602055 May 1948 GB
693500 Jul 1953 GB
981681 Jan 1965 GB
1044804 Oct 1966 GB
1058059 Feb 1967 GB
1329542 Sep 1973 GB
1405544 Sep 1975 GB
1418017 Dec 1975 GB
1596268 Aug 1981 GB
2 070 467 Sep 1981 GB
2 161 535 Jan 1986 GB
2 200 420 Aug 1988 GB
2 219 342 Dec 1989 GB
2 227 785 Aug 1990 GB
2 240 135 Jul 1991 GB
333846 Jan 1936 IT
448188 Dec 1948 IT
8806222 Aug 1988 WO