This application claims the benefit of European Application No. 16165898.4 filed on Apr. 19, 2016, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to the fine purification of isophoronediamine (IPDA) using a two-stage column setup comprising a partial condenser.
The production of IPDA by aminating hydrogenation of isophorone nitrile (IPN) is known and has been described numerous times.
In the simplest case (U.S. Pat. No. 3,352,913), IPN is reacted in the presence of hydrogen and of an excess of ammonia over a cobalt catalyst. IPN and ammonia initially react with elimination of water to form isophorone nitrile imine, IPNI, which is subsequently hydrogenated to IPDA.
In addition, processes for producing isophoronediamine are known from CN 104230721A, EP 2649042 A and WO 2012126869A.
In EP 2 649 042A isophoronediamine is produced from isophorone nitrile in a one- or two-stage reaction. Isophorone nitrile is initially iminated with ammonia to afford isophorone nitrile imine. Said isophorone nitrile imine is hydrogenated to afford isophoronediamine in the second step. The purification that follows the reaction is likewise divided into two steps. The low boilers are initially removed in a plurality of distillation columns, said low boilers including hydrogen, inert gases, ammonia and low-boiling impurities (low boiler removal). In a final step the pure isophoronediamine is then obtained via two vacuum distillation columns. The first column in turn serves to remove any remaining relatively low-boiling byproducts. In the second column the isophoronediamine is obtained in pure form as tops and thus separated from the organic residues (high boilers).
The present invention has for its object to provide a simple process for fine purification of isophoronediamine having reduced energy requirements in the form of heating and cooling power.
It was found that, surprisingly, the use of an additional partial condenser in the first vacuum distillation makes it possible to reduce the energy requirements for the fine distillation of isophoronediamine.
The invention provides a process for fine purification of crude isophoronediamine from the production of isophoronediamine by aminating hydrogenation of isophorone nitrile in the presence of at least ammonia, hydrogen, a hydrogenation catalyst and optionally further additions and in the presence or absence of organic solvents to obtain a crude isophoronediamine,
characterized in that the crude isophoronediamine is subjected to a fine purification via two vacuum distillation columns, wherein in the first vacuum distillation column the removal of any remaining relatively low-boiling byproducts is effected and in the second vacuum distillation column the isophoronediamine is obtained in pure form as tops and thus separated from the organic residues, and wherein the first vacuum distillation column has a partial condenser fitted to it.
Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference characters designate the same or similar parts throughout the several views, and wherein:
This entire process for producing pure IPDA is divided into three sections (see
The crude IPDA generally has the following composition in weight % (wt %):
Low boilers are defined as byproducts from the production process having a lower boiling point than IPDA. High boilers are defined as byproducts from the production process having a higher boiling point than IPDA.
The crude IPDA I is initially passed into the first vacuum distillation column, see
The partial condenser is operated under the following conditions:
The employed 1st vacuum distillation column has the following parameters:
The composition of the feed stream (crude IPDA II) from the 1st vacuum distillation column into the 2nd vacuum distillation column has the following composition:
The employed 2nd vacuum distillation column has the following parameters:
The purity of the pure isophoronediamine shall be at least 98 wt %.
The distillation was simulated using Aspen Plus. In the comparative example a setup composed of two vacuum distillation columns was chosen. At the top of the first distillation column a decanter was used to separate the two liquid phases, only the organic phase being used as reflux for the vacuum distillation column. The first vacuum distillation column had 36 theoretical plates and the second vacuum distillation column had 15 theoretical plates, with reflux-to-feed ratios of 1.1 (first vacuum distillation column) and 1.4 (second vacuum distillation column). The column pressure of the first vacuum distillation column was set to 110 mbar and that of the second vacuum distillation column was set to 80 mbar.
The feed stream employed at the following composition in weight % (wt %):
In the first vacuum distillation column the removal of the low boilers and of the water was effected at a bottoms temperature of 168° C. and a tops temperature of 95° C. The feed stream from the first vacuum distillation column into the second vacuum distillation column thus had the following composition:
In the second vacuum distillation column the fine purification of IPDA was effected at a bottoms temperature of 187° C. and a tops temperature of 159° C. A purity of 99.95 wt % was achieved. The total loss of IPDA over the 2 vacuum distillation column system was 0.2 wt %
At a chosen feed mass flow of 2160 kg per hour
the heating power required was: 1184 kW
and the cooling power required was: 1232 kW.
The distillation was simulated using Aspen Plus. In the inventive example a setup composed of two vacuum distillation columns was chosen. At the top of the first vacuum distillation column a decanter was used to separate the two liquid phases. In addition, a partial condenser was installed upstream of the decanter. In this apparatus the vapor stream was first partially condensed and then added to the vacuum distillation column as reflux. The remaining vapor stream was subsequently fully condensed and separated into the two liquid phases via the decanter. The organic phase was likewise used as reflux for the vacuum distillation column. The first vacuum distillation column had 36 theoretical plates and the second vacuum distillation column had 15 theoretical plates, with reflux-to-feed ratios of 1.1 (first vacuum distillation column) and 1.4 (second vacuum distillation column). The column pressure of the first vacuum distillation column was set to 110 mbar and that of the second vacuum distillation column was set to 80 mbar.
The feed stream employed at the following composition in weight % (wt %):
In the first vacuum distillation column the removal of the low boilers and of the water was effected at a bottoms temperature of 168° C., a tops temperature of 117° C. and a partial condenser temperature of 74° C. The feed stream from the first vacuum distillation column into the second vacuum distillation column thus had the following composition:
In the second vacuum distillation column the fine purification of IPDA was effected at a bottoms temperature of 187° C. and a tops temperature of 159° C. A purity of 99.95 wt % was achieved. The total loss of IPDA over the 2 column system was 0.2 wt %
At a chosen feed mass flow of 2160 kg per hour
the heating power required was: 1006 kW
and the cooling power required was: 1048 kW.
In the inventive distillation setup with the installed partial condenser the required heating and cooling powers were 15% lower than in the comparative setup.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16165898 | Apr 2016 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3352913 | Schmitt et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
8198481 | Kuppinger et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8252120 | Nordhoff et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8293941 | Kuppinger et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8362299 | Hengstermann et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8481784 | Kuppinger et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8877976 | Lettmann et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8895683 | Kuppinger et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9085506 | Galle et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20130253226 | Galle | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261341 | Lettmann | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20180029971 | Rittsteiger | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104230721 | Dec 2014 | CN |
2649042 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2012076315 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012126869 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2016120235 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Luyben, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 6416-6429. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170298003 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |