The present disclosure relates to a switchable roller finger follower for a valve train of an internal combustion (IC) engine, and more particularly, to the coupling pin of a switchable roller finger follower (SRFF) that provides at least two discrete valve lift modes.
More stringent fuel economy regulations in the transportation industry have prompted the need for improved efficiency of the IC engine. Light-weighting, friction reduction, thermal management, variable valve timing and a diverse array of variable valve lift technologies are all part of the technology toolbox for IC engine designers.
Variable valve lift (VVL) systems typically employ a technology in a valve train of an IC engine that allows different engine valve lifts to occur. The valve train is formed of the components that are required to actuate an engine valve, including a camshaft (also termed “cam”), the valve, and all components that lie in between. VVL systems are typically divided into two categories: continuous variable and discrete variable. Continuous variable valve lift systems are capable of varying a valve lift from a design lift minimum to a design lift maximum to achieve any of several lift heights. Discrete variable valve lift systems are capable of switching between two or more distinct valve lifts. Components that enable these different valve lift modes are often called switchable valve train components. Typical two-step discrete valve lift systems switch between a full valve lift mode and a partial valve lift mode, often termed cam profile switching, or between a full valve lift mode and a no valve lift mode that facilitates deactivation of the valve. Three-step discrete valve lift systems can combine valve deactivation and cam profile switching strategies. Valve deactivation can be applied in different ways. In the case of a four-valve-per-cylinder configuration (two intake+two exhaust), one of two intake valves can be deactivated. Deactivating only one of the two intake valves can provide for an increased swirl condition that enhances combustion of the air-fuel mixture. In another scenario, all of the intake and exhaust valves are deactivated for a selected cylinder which facilitates cylinder deactivation. On most engines, cylinder deactivation is applied to a fixed set of cylinders, when lightly loaded at steady-state speeds, to achieve the fuel economy of a smaller displacement engine. A lightly loaded engine running with a reduced amount of active cylinders requires a higher intake manifold pressure, and, thus, a greater throttle plate opening, than an engine running with all of its cylinders in the active state. Given the lower intake restriction, throttling losses are reduced in the cylinder deactivation mode and the engine runs with greater efficiency. For those engines that deactivate half of the cylinders, it is typical in the engine industry to deactivate every other cylinder in the firing order to ensure smoothness of engine operation while in this mode. Deactivation also includes shutting off the fuel to the dormant cylinders. Reactivation of dormant cylinders occurs when the driver demands more power for acceleration. The smooth transition between normal and partial engine operation is achieved by controlling ignition timing, cam timing and throttle position, as managed by the engine control unit (ECU). Examples of switchable valve train components that serve as cylinder deactivation facilitators include roller finger followers, roller lifters, pivot elements, rocker arms and camshafts; each of these components is able to switch from a full valve lift mode to a no valve lift mode. The switching of lifts occurs on the base circle or non-lift portion of the camshaft; therefore the time to switch from one mode to another is limited by the time that the camshaft is rotating through its base circle portion; more time for switching is available at lower engine speeds and less time is available at higher engine speeds. Maximum switching engine speeds are defined by whether there is enough time available on the base circle portion to fully actuate a coupling assembly to achieve the desired lift mode.
In today's IC engines, many of the switchable valve train components that enable valve deactivation for cylinder deactivation contain a coupling or locking assembly that is actuated by an electro-hydraulic system. The electro-hydraulic system typically contains at least one solenoid valve within an array of oil galleries that manages engine oil pressure to either lock or unlock the coupling assembly within the switchable valve train component to enable a valve lift switching event. These types of electro-hydraulic systems require time within the combustion cycle to actuate the switchable valve train component.
In most IC engine applications, switchable valve train components for cylinder deactivation in an electro-hydraulic system are classified as “pressure-less-locked”, which equates to:
a). In a no or low oil pressure condition, the spring-biased coupling assembly will be in a locked position, facilitating the function of a standard valve train component that translates rotary camshaft motion to linear valve motion; and,
b). In a condition in which engine oil pressure is delivered to the coupling assembly that exceeds the force of the coupling assembly bias spring, the coupling assembly will be displaced by a given stroke to an unlocked position, facilitating valve deactivation where the rotary camshaft motion is not translated to the valve.
“Pressure-less-unlocked” electro-hydraulic systems can be found in some cam profile switching systems that switch between a full valve lift and a partial valve lift, which equates to:
a). In a no or low oil pressure condition, the spring-biased coupling assembly will be in an unlocked position, facilitating a partial valve lift event; and,
b). In a condition in which engine oil pressure is delivered to the coupling assembly that exceeds the force of the coupling assembly bias spring, the coupling assembly will be displaced a given stroke to a locked position, facilitating a full valve lift event.
Vital to the durability and performance of a switchable valve train component is the robustness of the coupling assembly. Two important design attributes of the coupling assembly include: 1). the ability to switch from a locked to an unlocked position very quickly, and 2). a high resistance to wear. However, many times these attributes are in opposition. For example, the locking/unlocking stroke of the coupling assembly to engage/disengage an adjacent component has a direct impact on switching times; a shorter stroke for a given cross-sectional area of a coupling assembly will likely yield a faster switching time. Yet, a shorter stroke typically dictates a smaller contact area with the engaged or disengaged component, meaning that a given load is applied over a smaller area leading to higher contact pressures and subsequent wear. For this reason, various coupling assembly forms, materials, coatings and heat treatments are often employed in an effort to maximize wear resistance in order to minimize the actuation stroke and resultant contact area.
Many coupling assembly designs utilize a coupling pin that is configured with a locking surface that engages or disengages another locking surface to enable different valve lift modes. In the case of the SRFF, the coupling pin moves longitudinally within a bore of one lever to engage or disengage another lever. In many instances the coupling pin contains a flat locking surface that engages a corresponding flat locking surface. Flat locking surfaces are used because of their increased contact area and thus lower stresses and resultant wear, as compared to other shaped interfaces. However, alignment of the flat locking surface of the locking pin with the corresponding flat locking surface is required to enable locking functionality. Therefore, a solution is needed to provide alignment or anti-rotation of the locking pin, such that its flat locking surface maintains alignment with a corresponding flat locking surface. Additionally, a solution is needed that can be applied to different known SRFF designs that facilitate valve deactivation, cam profile switching, or a combination of the two, with a compact arrangement.
A coupling pin anti-rotation arrangement for multiple example embodiments of a SRFF, capable of switching between two or more valve lift modes of operation, is provided. In a first example embodiment, the SRFF is capable of switching between a full valve lift mode and a no valve lift mode. In a second example embodiment, the SRFF is capable of switching between a high valve lift mode and a low valve lift mode. Both example embodiments comprise of an outer lever that has two arms that extend along longitudinal sides of an inner lever. The inner lever has a cavity in the center to house a roller, mounted by a transverse axle, which serves as a camshaft interface. The inner and outer levers are pivotably connected at one end, and lockably connected at an opposite end. When the inner lever is locked to the outer lever via a coupling pin located on one of the inner or outer levers, a first, locked position is achieved, defining a first valve lift mode. When the coupling pin is longitudinally actuated within a coupling pin bore such that the inner lever is unlocked from the outer lever, a second, unlocked position is achieved, defining a second valve lift mode. During the second valve lift mode, at least one lost motion spring provides a force that acts upon one of the inner or outer lever during its arcuate movement relative to the other lever. The coupling pin contains a longitudinal coupling projection with a first locking surface in the form of a flat, located on the other of the inner or outer levers, to engage a second locking surface in the form of a flat upon actuation of the coupling pin within the coupling pin bore. To maintain alignment of the first and second locking surfaces, at least one coupling pin-side anti-rotation flat is applied to the longitudinal coupling projection of the coupling pin. The at least one coupling pin-side anti-rotation flat is slidably guided by at least one lever-side anti-rotation flat, located on the lever with the second locking surface, throughout its longitudinal movement within the coupling pin bore to ensure proper locking function. The lever-side anti-rotation flat can generally be in an L-shape and slidably guides the coupling pin-side anti-rotation flat in a lost motion direction and a coupling pin direction for the second, unlocked and first, locked positions, respectively. Various locations of the coupling pin bore and lever-side anti-rotation flats will now be described for the first and second example embodiments.
The first example embodiment of the SRFF that applies the disclosed arrangement for coupling pin anti-rotation comprises an outer lever that includes the coupling pin bore and an inner lever that houses the at least one lever-side anti-rotation flat. In a first, locked position, the first locking surface of the coupling pin is engaged with the second locking surface of the inner lever. In this first, locked position, the inner lever and outer lever rotate in unison about a hydraulic pivot element, resulting in a full valve lift mode. In a second, unlocked position, the first locking surface is disengaged with the second locking surface of the inner lever. In this second, unlocked position, the inner lever rotates independently of the outer lever, resulting in a no valve lift mode. The SRFF captured in the first example embodiment is typically utilized to facilitate engine valve deactivation.
The second example embodiment of the SRFF that applies the disclosed arrangement for coupling pin anti-rotation comprises an inner lever that houses the coupling pin bore and an outer lever that houses the at least one lever-side anti-rotation flat. In this example embodiment, the outer lever comprises at least one slider pad or roller to interface with at least one camshaft lobe. In a first, locked position, the first locking surface of the coupling pin is engaged with the second locking surface of the outer lever, resulting in a first valve lift mode. In a second, unlocked position, the first locking surface is disengaged with the second locking surface of the outer lever, resulting in a second valve lift mode. Both the first and second valve lift modes typically achieve different valve lifts that are greater than zero. The SRFF captured in the second example embodiment is typically utilized to facilitate cam profile switching.
Additional aspects of the disclosure that can be used alone or in various combinations are described below and in the claims.
The foregoing Summary as well as the following Detailed Description will be best understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. In the drawings:
Certain terminology is used in the following description for convenience only and is not limiting. The words “inner,” “outer,” “inwardly,” and “outwardly” refer to directions towards and away from the parts referenced in the drawings. A reference to a list of items that are cited as “at least one of a, b, or c” (where a, b, and c represent the items being listed) means any single one of the items a, b, c or combinations thereof. The terminology includes the words specifically noted above, derivatives thereof, and words of similar import.
Referring to
Referring now to
With reference to
Now referencing
Referring now to
The second example embodiment shown in
Having thus described various example embodiments of the present arrangement in detail, it is to be appreciated and will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many physical changes, only a few of which are exemplified in the detailed description above, could be made in the apparatus without altering the inventive concepts and principles embodied therein. The present example embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the embodiments being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7673601 | Spath et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7673606 | Ng | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20110226208 | Zurface et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170321574 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |