1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of coupling systems for use in surgical implants. More particularly, the present invention relates to such systems for use in orthopedic rod fixation systems.
2. Related Art
Bone stabilization/fixation devices to align or position bones have been used for some time. Such devices have been used to align or position specific vertebrae, or a specific region of the spine. Typically, such devices utilize a coupling assembly to connect or link two or more surgical screws and/or pedicle screws together to stabilize the bone and/or joint around which the screws are fixed. Conventional coupling assemblies are typically comprised of a relatively rigid member, such as a plate or a rod, that is used to couple or join adjacent structures or parts of the anatomy. Once the coupled structures are spatially fixed in position, surgical procedures can be completed and healing can proceed.
The present inventor has found, however, that such conventional surgical and/or pedicle screw coupling systems have several drawbacks. For example, such systems are rather large and bulky, which can result in increased tissue damage in and around the surgical site, resulting both from installation of the coupling system during surgery and from implant induced, post-operative tissue irritation and erosion. The relative bulk of prior art devices can be particularly troublesome in supra-fascial applications.
Some prior art coupling systems have a rod-receiving device that is delivered to the surgeon already coupled or attached to the head of the surgical screw, which poses two challenges: 1) this prevents certain surgical maneuvers (e.g. placing the screws prior to interbody work); and, 2) increases the carrying cost of the inventory. Furthermore, traditional coupling systems do not allow for varying the rod stiffness along a multi-segmented construct; certain indications may require a stiff rod over one segment and a flexible rod over another.
Further, traditional systems inherently possess an inability to easily extend a fusion: e.g., in a revision procedure, the existing rod would need to be either completely removed and replaced with a new rod or cut in vivo. In addition, some of the prior art coupling systems include locking components (e.g., set screws and the like) that must all be carefully assembled together during the surgical procedure. Further, many traditional surgical screw system designs complicate or even preclude the ability to be placed percutaneously over a guide wire, which makes these systems more difficult to install and maneuver during surgical procedures, including minimally invasive procedures.
Furthermore, many prior art devices require that the rod be attached to the coupling device after the screw is inserted in the bone, which can be disadvantageous at times, whereas the option to assemble the rod to the coupling device outside the wound may prove valuable. Also, existing coupling systems often necessitate simultaneous locking of all components, which prevents the ability to properly compress a coupling system along the rod because the angle relative to the surgical screw would change.
Furthermore, predicate technology necessitates bending of the rod for multi-segmented constructs. Rod bending is not only cumbersome to perform, but invariably results in an unintended stress applied to the bones.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a coupling assembly for use in surgical constructs is provided, including a first body and a second body. One of the first body and the second body includes a male member and an other of the first body and the second body includes a female member. The male member is sized and shaped to be received within the female member and the female member has an internal bore sized and shaped to receive the male member therein. A raised portion can be formed on or attached to the male member. An area of decreased diameter can be associated with the internal bore of the female member. The first and second bodies are coupleable to one another by an interference fit when a portion of the male member is positioned within an area of smaller diameter associated with the internal bore of the female member.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a coupling assembly for use in surgical constructs is provided, including a first body and a second body. One of the first body and the second body can include a male member and an other of the first body and the second body can include a female member. The male member is sized and shaped to be received within the female member and the female member can have an internal bore sized and shaped to receive the male member therein. A raised portion can be formed on or attached to the male member. A cinch band can be applied to an outer portion of the female member that applies a compressive force to the female member to create an area of decreased diameter within the internal bore of the female member. The first and second bodies can be coupleable to one another by an interference fit when the raised portion of the male member is positioned within the area of decreased diameter in the internal bore of the female member.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of coupling portions of a surgical construct to one another is provided, including: obtaining a first body and a second body, one of the first body and the second body including a male member and an other of the first body and the second body including a female member, the male member being sized and shaped to be received within the female member and the female member having an internal bore sized and shaped to receive the male member therein; positioning a raised portion formed on or attached to the male member within the internal bore of the female member; and creating an area of decreased diameter within the internal bore of the female member about or around the raised portion of the male member to thereby couple the first body and the second body to one another by an interference fit.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of implanting a coupling assembly within a patient is provided, including: attaching one of a first body and a second body to a first surgical screw, one of the first body and the second body including a male member and an other of the first body and the second body including a female member, the male member being sized and shaped to be received within the female member and the female member having an internal bore sized and shaped to receive the male member therein; positioning a raised portion formed on or attached to the male member within the internal bore of the female member; and creating an area of decreased diameter within the internal bore of the female member about or around the raised portion of the male member to thereby couple the first body and the second body to one another by an interference fit.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention.
The following drawings illustrate exemplary embodiments for carrying out the invention. Like reference numerals refer to like parts in different views or embodiments of the present invention in the drawings.
Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated in the drawings, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the inventive features illustrated herein, and additional applications of the principles of the inventions as illustrated herein, which would occur to one skilled in the relevant art and having possession of this disclosure, are to be considered within the scope of the invention.
As used herein, the singular forms “a” and “the” can include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a coupler” can include one or more of such couplers.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As an arbitrary example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. As another arbitrary example, a composition that is “substantially free of” an ingredient or element may still actually contain such item as long as there is no measurable effect thereof.
As used herein, the terms “attached,” “coupled,” fixed,” etc., can be used to describe a condition in which two or more components are coupled to one another in such a manner that they function as intended: that is, the force required to uncouple the components is sufficiently large such that the components will remain attached to one another during the service for which they were designed. Unless indicated to the contrary, such “coupled” components can be separable if sufficient force is applied to the components. In some aspects of the invention, components are elastically fixed or coupled to one another and will remain fixed during the useful life of the product for which they are designed; however, they may be uncoupled from one another using an appropriate level of force (applied in an appropriate manner and location), and will return to an original configuration (e.g., a condition, state, shape, size, etc.), which existed prior to the components being coupled to one another.
As used herein, when an area within a construct body is described as having a “decreased diameter,” it is to be understood that the area described includes a diameter that is smaller than adjacent areas (either on one or both sides of the area of decreased diameter). For example, an area within a bore may have a decreased diameter as compared to other portions of the bore. In some embodiments, the area of decreased diameter within the bore will appear (although possibly not to the human eye) as an inner “rib,” or raised portion, having a smaller diameter than adjacent portions.
The term “body” can be used herein to refer to a variety of components of a surgical construct. For example, several components are illustrated in
As used herein, the term “interference fit” shall be interpreted broadly as including the joining of any two mating parts such that one or the other (or both) parts slightly deviate in size from their nominal dimension, thereby deforming such part slightly, each being compressed, the interface between two parts creating a union of extremely high friction. The word “interference” refers to the fact that one part slightly interferes with the space that the other is occupying in its nominal dimension. In one aspect of the invention, interference fit can be configured to require at least about 800 pounds of force to remove a male member from a female member. In one aspect of the invention, interference fit can be configured to require at least about 400 pounds of force to remove a male member from a female member. In one aspect of the invention, interference fit can be configured to require at least about 1200 pounds of force to remove a male member from a female member.
As used herein, the term “about” is used to provide flexibility to a numerical range endpoint by providing that a given value may be “a little above” or “a little below” the endpoint.
As used herein, a plurality of items, structural elements, compositional elements, and/or materials may be presented in a common list for convenience. However, these lists should be construed as though each member of the list is individually identified as a separate and unique member. Thus, no individual member of such list should be construed as a de facto equivalent of any other member of the same list solely based on their presentation in a common group without indications to the contrary.
Numerical data may be expressed or presented herein in a range format. It is to be understood that such a range format is used merely for convenience and brevity and thus should be interpreted flexibly to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. As an illustration, a numerical range of “about 1 to about 5” should be interpreted to include not only the explicitly recited values of about 1 to about 5, but also include individual values and sub-ranges within the indicated range. Thus, included in this numerical range are individual values such as 2, 3, and 4 and sub-ranges such as from 1-3, from 2-4, and from 3-5, etc., as well as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, individually.
This same principle applies to ranges reciting only one numerical value as a minimum or a maximum. Furthermore, such an interpretation should apply regardless of the breadth of the range or the characteristics being described.
The present invention relates generally to surgical construct systems that can include a variety of coupling assemblies that are used to connect a variety of surgical screws. The surgical screws generally include a threaded portion which is used to implant the screws into the body of a patient, often into bone of the patient. The present system is suitable for use with a variety of orthopedic rod placement devices, hooks, and/or surgical screws, including, but not limited to, pedicle screws and orthopedic rods used in spinal surgery.
As shown specifically in
Turning to
Coupling or attaching of the male member 20 to the female member 22 can be accomplished in a number of manners. In one embodiment of the invention, the male member includes a raised portion 26 that can be formed on or attached to the male member. The internal bore 24 of the female member can include an area of decreased diameter associated therewith. The area of decreased diameter (25 in
To couple the connector rod body 12a to the “T” coupler body 14, the raised portion 26 of the male member 20 and the area of decreased diameter 25 within the bore of the female member 22 are positioned adjacent one another and an interference fit is created between the two bodies. This condition is shown by the displaced cinch band 28′ in
While a sliding cinch band 28 is shown in the figures, it is to be understood that the area of decreased diameter 25 within the bore 24 of the female member 22 can be accomplished in a number of manners. In one aspect of the invention, the area of decreased diameter can be a permanent feature formed within the bore. In another aspect, the cinch band can be very loosely fitted about the outer portion of the female member (such that almost no force is required to move it along the length of the outer portion), and it can be clamped into position about the outer portion where desired. In yet another aspect, the cinch band can be formed from a shape memory alloy that can be activated by a change in temperature or by stress. A variety of other methods can be used to accomplish this result, so long as the resultant force applied by the cinch band is sufficient to create the area of decreased diameter within the bore of the female member.
In the aspect of the invention shown in
The raised portion 26 can include a generally spherical outer contour that allows the coupling rod body 12a to be rotated relative to the “T” coupler 14 (or other body) to provide easy adjustments in angle between bodies. As shown, for example, in
While not so required, the raised portion 26 can include one or more slots (27 in
As shown in
In the system shown, the various bodies 12a, 16a, 14, etc., can be coupled to one another by an interference fit that effectively locks the components in position relative to one another once implanted into a patient. However, due to the unique design elements of the raised portion (or band) 26 and the cinch band 28, the interference fit can be created elastically. In this manner, all of the components utilized can be disengaged (or uncoupled) from one another, and will return to their original condition (e.g., their original shape, dimensions, etc.). Thus, the present system can be disassembled and used again if, for example, the surgeon wishes to readjust the various components after installation, or if later surgery requires dismantling, adjustment or additions to the system.
One or more of the bodies 12a, 14, 16a, 16b, 16c, etc., can include a receptacle (32 in
While set screw 36, shown in most of the embodiments, remains in place over the ball socket 34, it is to be understood that a removable set screw could also be utilized. This is due to the design of the ball socket, which becomes locked in place over the head of the surgical screws and remains in place unless it becomes necessary to remove the body from the surgical screw. In addition, a tool or implement could be used to lock the ball socket in place over the head of the surgical screw, and no set screw would be required.
The present invention advantageously provides a surgeon with a great deal of latitude when deciding the order in which the various components of the system will be coupled one to another. Thus, the sequence of locking can be varied depending on what the surgeon is attempting to do to manipulate bone position. Specifically, the surgeon may choose a unique sequence of locking rods-to-couplers or couplers-to-bone screws for each of several surgical maneuvers (e.g. in spinal surgery he might employ unique sequences to reduce a spondylolisthesis, correct scoliosis, change lordosis, manipulate disc space height, etc.). The novel segmentation of rods and unique mechanism for locking simplify surgical correction of bones.
In
One of ordinary skill in the art, having possession of this disclosure, could readily appreciate that a different order or fixing the various components could be utilized if the surgeon wished to accomplish a different result.
In addition to the apparatus discussed above, the present invention also provides various methods of coupling components of surgical constructs, and implanting surgical constructs. In one embodiment, a method of coupling portions of a surgical construct to one another is provided, including: obtaining a first body and a second body, one of the first body and the second body including a male member and an other of the first body and the second body including a female member, the male member being sized and shaped to be received within the female member and the female member having an internal bore sized and shaped to receive the male member therein; positioning a raised portion formed on or attached to the male member within the internal bore of the female member; and creating an area of decreased diameter within the internal bore of the female member about or around the raised portion of the male member to thereby couple the first body and the second body to one another by an interference fit.
In another aspect, a method of implanting a coupling assembly within a patient is provided, including: attaching one of a first body and a second body to a first surgical screw, one of the first body and the second body including a male member and an other of the first body and the second body including a female member, the male member being sized and shaped to be received within the female member and the female member having an internal bore sized and shaped to receive the male member therein; positioning a raised portion formed on or attached to the male member within the internal bore of the female member; and creating an area of decreased diameter within the internal bore of the female member about or around the raised portion of the male member to thereby couple the first body and the second body to one another by an interference fit.
It is to be understood that the above-referenced arrangements are illustrative of the application for the principles of the present invention. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements can be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention while the present invention has been shown in the drawings and described above in connection with the exemplary embodiments(s) of the invention. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications can be made without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention as set forth in the examples.
Priority is claimed of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/478,808, filed Apr. 25, 2011, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/711,131, filed Feb. 23, 2010, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3945053 | Hillberry et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
5405408 | Pitkin | Apr 1995 | A |
5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
5733285 | Errico | Mar 1998 | A |
5772661 | Michelson | Jun 1998 | A |
5964760 | Richelsoph | Oct 1999 | A |
6045552 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6063089 | Errico et al. | May 2000 | A |
6355040 | Richelsoph | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379354 | Rogozinski | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6440169 | Elberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6527804 | Gauchet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540785 | Gill et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6572653 | Simonson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579320 | Gauchet et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6610093 | Pisharodi | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6626904 | Jammet et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645248 | Casutt | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6723127 | Ralph et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6793678 | Hawkins | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802867 | Manasas et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811567 | Reiley | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6863688 | Ralph et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6936071 | Marnay et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6949123 | Reiley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964666 | Jackson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6966910 | Ritland | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974478 | Reiley et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983924 | Howell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991632 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997955 | Zubok et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7029475 | Panjabi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7074238 | Stinson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093827 | Culpepper | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7115129 | Heggeness | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7144369 | Bardy | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7207992 | Ritland | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7229441 | Trieu et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7322982 | Vincent-Prestigiacomo | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326210 | Jahng et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338398 | Whiting et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7361196 | Fallin et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371238 | Soboleski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377942 | Berry | May 2008 | B2 |
7445635 | Fallin et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7458981 | Fielding et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476238 | Panjabi | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7476251 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7481830 | Wall et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485133 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7485134 | Simonson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7485146 | Crook et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7491218 | Landry et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491238 | Arnin et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491240 | Carver et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7494507 | Dixon et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7537615 | Lemaire | May 2009 | B2 |
7618441 | Groiso | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632292 | Sengupta et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682375 | Ritland | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7785351 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7909877 | Krueger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8025681 | Colleran et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20020138077 | Ferree | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151900 | Glascott | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030171751 | Ritland | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040002708 | Ritland | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040176849 | Zubok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050038432 | Shaolian et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050101954 | Simonson | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113924 | Buttermann | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113927 | Malek | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125065 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149023 | Ritland | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159818 | Blain | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165487 | Muhanna | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177156 | Timm et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192573 | Abdelgany et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203516 | Biedermann et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228382 | Richelsoph et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240270 | Zubok et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261772 | Filippi et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009768 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009850 | Frigg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025770 | Schlapfer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036240 | Colleran et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041314 | Millard | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052784 | Dant et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084987 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060189983 | Fallin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190079 | Istephanous et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206114 | Ensign et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060217712 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229609 | Wang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240533 | Sengupta et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271047 | Jackson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271051 | Berrevoets | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016193 | Ritland | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028714 | Lusk et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043365 | Ritland | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049936 | Colleran et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088440 | Eisermann et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070179618 | Trieu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080015588 | Hawkes | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077246 | Fehling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140075 | Ensign | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154308 | Sherman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167688 | Fauth et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183209 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195208 | Castellvi | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080195213 | Halverson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234739 | Hudgins et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080312693 | Trautwein et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005819 | Ben-Mokhtar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090048631 | Bhatnagar et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090228045 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259257 | Prevost | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270921 | Krause | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100204732 | Aschmann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211106 | Bowden et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217324 | Bowden et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217326 | Bowden et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217334 | Hawkes | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222821 | Bowden et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222823 | Bowden et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241232 | Halverson et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1072228 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1224915 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1970031 | Sep 2008 | EP |
1020050080493 | Aug 2005 | KR |
1020060113318 | Nov 2006 | KR |
WO 2004071344 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005051243 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005107654 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006127992 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007041265 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008070840 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008100891 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2010030906 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010096621 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010096829 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010108010 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jeanneau et al.; “A Compliant Rolling Contact Joint and it's Application in a 3-DOF Planar Parallel Mechanism with Kinematic Analysis”; Proceedings of DETC'04, ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; Sep. 28-Oct. 2, 2004; Salt Lake City, Utah USA. DETC2004-57264, 2004by ASME. |
Cannon et al.; “Compliant Rolling-Contact Element Mechanisms”; Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2005, 2005 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Sep. 24-28, 2005, 2005; Long Beach, California, USA; DETC2005-84073. |
Halverson et al.; “Concepts for Achieving Multi-Stability in Compliant Rolling-Contact Elements”; Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2007; ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; Sep. 24-28, 2007; Las Vegas, USA; DETC2007-34836. |
Halverson et al.; Tension-Based Multi-Stable Compliant Rolling-Contact Elements': 13th National Conference on Mechanisms and Machines (NaCoMM-2007); IISc, Bangalore, India; Dec. 12-13, 2007. |
Jacobsen et al.; “Components for the Design of Lamina Emergent Mechanism”; Proceedings of IMECE 2007, 2007 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; Nov. 10-16, 2007; Seattle, USA. |
Jacobsen et al.; “Mechanism and Machine Theory”; Mechanism and Machine Theory; 2009; pp. 2098-2109; vol. 44; Elsevier. |
Stratton et al.; Force-Displacement Model of the Flexsure™ Spinal Implant; Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE; Aug. 15-18, 2010; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/916,110, filed Oct. 29, 2010; Spencer P. Magleby. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/711,131, filed Feb. 23, 2010; David R. Hawkes; office action dated Jun. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/711,131, filed Feb. 23, 2010; David T. Hawkes; office action dated Dec. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/952,709, filed Dec. 7, 2007; Michael D. Ensign; office action dated Nov. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/284,438, filed Nov. 21, 2005; Michael D. Ensign; office action dated Nov. 12, 2013. |
International application No. PCT/US2013/066292; filing date Oct. 23, 2013; Nexus Spine, L.L.C.; International Search Report mailed Jan. 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/711,131, filed Feb. 23, 2010; David T. Hawkes; office action dated Mar. 24, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/709,240, filed Feb. 19, 2010; Anton E. Bowden; office action dated Apr. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. 12/726,816, filed Mar. 18, 2010; Peter Halverson; office action issued Jan. 31, 2013. |
PCT Application PCT/US2012/041360; filing date Jun. 7, 2012; Eric Dodgen; International Search Report mailed Dec. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. 12/916,110, filed Oct. 29, 2010; Spencer P. Magleby; office action issued Dec. 14, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130110170 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61478808 | Apr 2011 | US |