The present application is a U.S. National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP05/11988 filed Nov. 9, 2005, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 of German Patent Application No. 10 2004 054 368.2 filed Nov. 10, 2004.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a cladding panel with two pairs of side edges lying opposite to one another and, in particular, a cladding panel having at least one pair of side edges provided with a coupling device embodied essentially in the form of a groove and a tongue and extending along the respective side edge.
2. Discussion of Background Information
Cladding panels of this type are generally known. Reference is made by way of example to EP 1 036 244 B1.
Generic panels are usually produced by essentially cuboid-shaped raw panels, i.e., raw panels, having side surfaces which are assigned to the side edges that run essentially orthogonally to the walking surface, being machined. This machining may be done, for example, by milling to form a coupling means on at least one pair of side edges, namely in the form of a groove in the area of one side surface and a tongue in the area of the other side surface. The purpose of this chip removal is thereby always to achieve the smoothest surfaces possible in order to slide two panels, which are connected to one another via a groove and a tongue, in the longitudinal direction of the respective side edge when laying the cladding panels.
One problem that generic cladding panels always have to deal with in practice is seasonal variations in relative humidity. In times of high relative humidity, the cladding panels expand because of swelling, whereas the cladding panels shrink during the heating period in winter because of low relative humidity. This swelling and shrinking causes the formation of cracks between panels abutting one another even if, as is customary with many types of cladding panels currently available on the market, the cladding panel's coupling mechanism is embodied with an integrated locking mechanism extendable in the longitudinal direction of the respective side edge of the cladding panel. These coupling mechanisms try to counteract the relative movement of the two panels in the direction of the panel plane, and orthogonally to the respective side edge. Cracks may also form from the effects of static and mechanical-dynamic stresses exerted on the floor, e.g., by heavy pieces of furniture or by walking on it. With rectangular cladding panels this crack formation problem occurs particularly at the short sides of the panels. The crack formation problem may also occur to a particular extent if the panels, as is customary today, are laid in a freely floating manner on the subfloor, i.e., are not connected to the subfloor by separate connecting means and are not glued to one another.
To prevent crack formation, EP 0 843 763 A1, EP 1 024 234 A1, and EP 1 026 341 A1, suggest a cladding panel which, when two panels are in a connected state, has a lower lip delimiting the groove of one panel and pressing against the tongue of the other panel with a prestressing force. This prestressing force is thereby produced by a permanent displacement of the lower lip from its resting position, when the panels are in an unconnected state. This permanent displacement causes a constant mechanical stress and a gradual fatigue of the panel material.
An aspect of the present invention is to provide a cladding panel of the type mentioned at the outset, which may be used to counteract the formation of cracks between two connected panels, without providing a prestressing force of this type.
This aspect is attained according to the invention by a cladding panel of the type mentioned at the outset, which has a roughening in at least one section of the groove's boundary surface and/or in at least one section of the tongue's boundary surface.
In connection with the present invention, “boundary surface” hereby refers to the surface extending from the side surface of the respective side edge, following the groove with a face normal facing into the groove, or following the tongue with a face normal facing away from the tongue and ending on the other side of the groove or of the tongue at the side surface of the side edge.
By providing the roughening according to the invention the friction between the groove of one panel and the tongue of the other panel is increased so that a relative displacement of the two interconnected panels in the longitudinal direction of the groove or tongue is made more difficult. This also counteracts the crack formation on the panel side running orthogonally to this longitudinal direction as well. Accordingly, if the cladding panel is a rectangular cladding panel with a short side and a long side, the crack formation can be counteracted at the short side of the panel in that at least one section of the boundary surface of groove and/or tongue includes a roughening at least on the long side. Naturally, providing a roughening in the area of the groove and/or the tongue on the short side of the panel also results in a reduction of the tendency of cracks to form on the long side of the panel.
With respect to achieving the highest possible friction, it is preferred that at least one section of the boundary surface with the roughening extends over essentially the entire length of the respective side edge, as well as in the circumferential direction of the boundary surface over essentially the entire circumference of the boundary surface. However, it can also be desirable, e.g., at least for reasons of manufacturing engineering, for at least one section of the boundary surface with the roughening to extend over merely a part of the length of the respective side edge and/or in the circumferential direction over merely a part of the boundary surface.
The friction between the boundary surface of the groove and the corresponding boundary surface of the tongue can be further increased in that, whenever at least one section of the groove's boundary surface and at least one section of the tongue's boundary surface are provided with a roughening, the roughening is provided at least in part on sections of the boundary surfaces of the groove and the tongue complementary to one another. Two sections of the boundary surfaces of a panel's groove or tongue are considered “complementary” within the meaning of this invention if the groove section provided with a roughening of the panel and the tongue section provided with a roughening of the other panel bear against one another in the connected state.
The roughening can be embodied in different ways: for example, at least one section provided with a roughening can be formed by a toothing. In order to achieve the highest possible friction between two connected panels, it is thereby suggested that the tooth sequence direction of the toothing run essentially in the longitudinal direction of the respective side edge, whereas the tooth extension direction runs essentially in the circumferential direction of the groove or the tongue. “Tooth sequence direction” thereby means the direction in which the teeth of the toothing follow one another which, in a conventional gear wheel is in the circumferential direction of the gear wheel. By contrast, the “tooth extension direction” means the direction in which the individual tooth extends which, in a conventional gear wheel with straight teeth is in the axial direction.
The toothing can be formed, e.g., by essentially chipless machining, for instance by indenting, serrating, or the like. Additionally, or alternatively, it is also possible to form the toothing by a chip-forming machining, e.g., by piercing, milling, or the like. With both alternatives for producing the toothing it is, however, advantageous to use a tool the rotational speed of which is adjusted to the feed rate of the panel such that its circumferential speed essentially corresponds to the feed rate of the panel.
In another embodiment, which can be used additionally or alternatively to the formation of the roughened section as a toothing, at least one section provided with a roughening can be formed by a plurality of wood fibers protruding from the surface of the respective section of the boundary surface. In order to cause the fibers to stand up, the surface can be treated with an agent, e.g., with a water-dilutable varnish (such as an unplasticized aqueous copolymer latex) which releases the fibers at least in part from their material compound, e.g., solid wood, MDF, or another wood material, and then raises and fixes the fibers.
According to another embodiment, which can also be used in addition to, or alternatively to, the above-discussed embodiments, at least one section provided with a roughening can be formed by a plurality of particles applied to the surface of the respective section of the boundary surface. These particles can be, e.g., particles of micronized polypropylene wax with a size between approximately 30 μm and 75 μm. Furthermore, these particles can be joined to the surface of the respective section of the boundary surface by means of an adhesion promoter, e.g., a water-dilutable varnish (such as an unplasticized aqueous copolymer latex).
As indicated above, at least the core of the panel can be formed of a wood material, e.g., solid wood, a chipboard, an MDF board, or the like. However, it is also possible to apply the principles according to the invention to other materials, e.g., compact laminate, plastic, or the like.
As already mentioned above, the coupling mechanism can be embodied with an integrated locking mechanism extending in the longitudinal direction of the respective side edge. These locking mechanisms can be formed from a core material, e.g., in one piece. However, it is also conceivable to embody the locking mechanism and/or the coupling mechanism in or at a coupling unit connected to the panel's core. This coupling unit can be connected to the panel's core such that, e.g., a suitable material such as plastic, a wood extrudate, or the like, is injected into a prepared indentation in the side surface of the panel and is subsequently machined in a material-removing manner to form the coupling mechanism and/or the locking mechanism. But, as an alternative, it is also possible to insert a prefabricated part with a coupling mechanism and/or a locking mechanism prefabricated thereon into the prepared indentation.
The invention can be used in a particularly advantageous manner if the cladding panel is a flooring panel, and particularly if the flooring panel is designated to be laid in a floating manner and/or without the use of adhesive to connect adjacent panels.
The invention is explained in more detail below by means of exemplary embodiments on the basis of the enclosed drawings. They show:
In
The coupling mechanism 12 is composed essentially in the form of a groove 12a provided on the long side 10a and a tongue 12b provided on the long side 10b, which together form the coupling mechanism on the long side. Additionally, the coupling mechanism is composed of a groove 12c provided on the short side 10c and a tongue 12d provided on the short side 10d, which together form the coupling mechanism on the short side. These coupling mechanisms 12 can be embodied in different variants, some of which will be explained below in more detail with reference to
The representation according to
The embodiment represented in
When the two panels 10 are connected, the engagement of the coupling mechanism 12 prevents the relative movement of the two panels 10 in the upward direction H (see
In contrast to the panels of the prior art, the panels 10 according to the invention also have a roughening 18 which at least impedes a relative movement of two panels 10 connected to one another in the longitudinal direction of the respective side edge 10a/10b, 10c/10d. To this end, at least one surface section of the surfaces bearing against one another of the coupling mechanism 12 and the locking mechanism 14 is provided with a roughening 18 of this type. In the exemplary embodiment represented in
In the longitudinal direction of the two side edges, the roughenings 18 extend preferably over the entire length of the edges, whereas they are merely provided on part of the boundary surfaces of the groove or the tongue in the circumferential direction U, as shown in
As indicated diagrammatically in
As shown diagrammatically in
In addition,
The panel 110 represented in
Also in the exemplary embodiment shown in
It is also conceivable to provide only one of the two complementary surfaces 116a, 126 with sprayed-on particles of this type to achieve a higher friction between the two panels 110. Furthermore, it is also conceivable to apply particles of this type to the surfaces not visible in
Another embodiment for the roughening according to the invention is explained below based on the diagrammatical representations according to
Additionally, a solvent can be applied to the surfaces 116a and 126 by way of the spraying tools 128 and 130, wherein the solvent starts to dissolve a wood material, e.g., solid wood, MDF, or the like, used to form the panels 110 to such an extent that individual wood fibers disengage at least in part from the material compound and project out of the surface when the treatment agent has dried. In this case, roughening 118a designates the wood fibers projecting from the surfaces 116a and 126a in
The panels 10, 110 can be made of any material, e.g., a wood material such as: solid-wood boards, MDF boards, chipboards, or the like. The panels 10, 110 can also be made of compact laminate, plastic, and suitable panel materials of this type.
If the panels are to be used as flooring panels, they can have a core 10e, 110e, as indicated in
The groove 112a, 112c or the tongue 112b, 112d do not necessarily have to be formed directly of the material of the core 110e. Rather, as indicated by a dashed line in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 054 368 | Nov 2004 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2005/011988 | 11/9/2005 | WO | 00 | 5/8/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/050928 | 5/18/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4110949 | Cambiuzzi et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
5618602 | Nelson | Apr 1997 | A |
6006486 | Moriau et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6421970 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438919 | Knauseder | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6505452 | Hannig et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6682254 | Olofsson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6736691 | Bach | May 2004 | B1 |
6862857 | Tychsen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7137229 | Pervan | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7188456 | Knauseder | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20010024707 | Andersson et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20030009971 | Palmberg | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060260254 | Pervan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272262 | Pomberger | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070065293 | Hannig | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090199502 | Eisermann | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 539 791 | Jan 2005 | CA |
297 24 428 | May 2001 | DE |
100 34 409 | Jan 2002 | DE |
202 19 023 | Mar 2003 | DE |
103 29 686 | Feb 2005 | DE |
101 41 791 | Dec 2006 | DE |
1 024 234 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 026 341 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 483 017 | Jun 1967 | FR |
09-317132 | Dec 1997 | JP |
2000-145104 | May 2000 | JP |
2001-504180 | Mar 2001 | JP |
9747834 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9822677 | May 1998 | WO |
9858142 | Dec 1998 | WO |
03074814 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004079128 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005003488 | Jan 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080000185 A1 | Jan 2008 | US |