The present specification generally relates to the field of covert surveillance for detecting threat items and contraband, either in a vehicle or on a person, and more specifically to a covert mobile inspection vehicle which combines a plurality of detection and prevention components that may be deployed rapidly to a threat zone to aid detection and prevention of subversive activities.
Currently, there exists the threat of terrorism. To counter this threat, there is a requirement for systems to be put in place to detect and deal with subversive activity. Some of such systems known in the art are purely designed to detect subversive activity; others are designed to prevent subversive activity; while still other known systems are designed purely as a deterrent. For example, some systems are primarily physical (such as barriers and security agents), some rely on networks of sensors (such as CCTV systems) while others involve dedicated installations (such as radio jamming mast or X-ray scanning machines).
What is needed, however, are covert surveillance systems that can be effectuated with high mobility and speedy deployment and that allow the use of a plurality of surveillance data to enable more informed, robust and intelligent threat detection and prevention.
Accordingly, there is need for a covert mobile inspection vehicle that uses a plurality of prevention and detection components or sensors.
There is also need for a system that intelligently integrates and/or correlates surveillance information from the plurality of multi-modality sensors to detect and prevent subversive activities.
In one embodiment, the present specification discloses a covert mobile inspection vehicle comprising: a backscatter X-ray scanning system comprising an X-ray source and a plurality of detectors for obtaining a radiographic image of an object outside the vehicle; at least one sensor for determining a distance from at least one of the plurality of detectors to points on the surface of the object; a processor for processing the obtained radiographic image by using the determined distance of the object to obtain an atomic number of each material contained in the object; and one or more sensors to obtain surveillance data from a predefined area surrounding the vehicle. In an embodiment, the sensor is a scanning laser range finder causing a beam of infra-red light to be scattered from the surface of the object wherein a time taken for the beam of infra-red light to return to the sensor is indicative of the distance to the surface of the object.
Further, in an embodiment, the processor causes an intensity correction to be applied to the obtained radiographic image thereby causing intensity of the image of an object located at a distance greater than a predefined distance to be reduced by a predefined factor and intensity of the image of an object located at a distance lesser than a predefined distance to be increased by a predefined factor.
In another embodiment, the processor implements an adaptive region based averaging method whereby backscattered X-rays from a first region of the object located at a distance greater than a predefined distance from the X-ray source are averaged over a second larger predefined region, causing a linear dimension of the first region to be sealed as a square of the distance from X-ray source to the object. In yet another embodiment, the adaptive region averaging method is implemented by using a statistical filter to determine if a first pixel of an obtained radiographic image is part of a first object or of a second adjacent object. Also, in an embodiment, one or more individual pixels in the obtained radiographic image are colored based on the determined distance of the object and an atomic number of each material contained in the object.
In another embodiment, the obtained distance of the object is used to provide a geometric correction to produce a true likeness of the shape of the object. In yet another embodiment, the X-ray source comprises an X-ray tube having a cathode-anode potential difference ranging from 160 kV to 320 kV and a tube current ranging from 1 mA to 50 mA for producing a broad spectrum of X-ray energies.
Further, in an embodiment, the plurality of detectors comprise one of: an inorganic scintillation detector such as NAI(TI), and an organic scintillator such as polyvinyl toluene; each detector being coupled with one or more light sensitive readout devices such as a photomultiplier tube or a photodiode. Also, in an embodiment, the plurality of detectors comprise semiconductor sensors having a wide bandgap such as, CdTe, CdZnTe or HgI which can operate at room temperature. In another embodiment, the plurality of detectors comprises semiconductor sensors having a narrow bandgap such as HPGe.
In yet another embodiment, the covert mobile inspection vehicle further comprises a data acquisition module comprising a plurality of detectors, photomultipliers/photodiodes and analog-to-digital converter circuitry. Also in an embodiment, the covert mobile inspection vehicle comprises at least one of: a GPS receiver, a scanning laser, a CCTV camera, an infra-red camera, an audio microphone, a directional RF antenna, a wide-band antenna, a chemical sensor, and a jamming device. In another embodiment, the covert mobile inspection vehicle also comprises an automated detection processor for: integrating and analysing in real time the surveillance data from the one or more sensors; and sending threat items obtained by analyzing the surveillance data for review to an operator via wired or wireless means. In another embodiment, the covert mobile inspection vehicle further comprises means for broadcasting the surveillance data to a central intelligence location in real time.
In an embodiment, the X-ray source comprises a multi-element scatter collimator to produce a fan beam of X rays for irradiating the object being scanned; backscattered X rays from the object being detected by a segmented detector array located behind the multi-element collimator and comprising one detector element corresponding to each collimator element.
In an embodiment, the present specification describes a method for obtaining an atomic number (Z) of each material contained in an object being scanned by a covert mobile inspection vehicle comprising: a backscatter X-ray scanning system comprising an X-ray source and a plurality of detectors for obtaining a radiographic image of the object; at least one sensor for determining a distance from at least one of the plurality of detectors to points on the surface of the object; and a processor for processing the obtained radiographic image by using the determined distance of the object to obtain an atomic number of each material contained in the object; the method comprising the steps of: determining a true extent of each region of the radiographic image by using a statistical filter; calculating a standard deviation of energies of pixels present in each region; calculating a product or the obtained standard deviation and a mean of the energies of pixels present in each region; and comparing the calculated product to a pre-determined scale where a low value of the product corresponds to a low Z material and a high value of the product corresponds to a high Z material.
In another embodiment, the present invention discloses a covert mobile inspection vehicle comprising: a backscatter X-ray scanning system comprising an X-ray source and a plurality of detectors for obtaining a radiographic image of an object outside the vehicle; and one or more sensors to obtain surveillance data from a predefined area surrounding the vehicle. In an embodiment, at least one of the sensors is a scanning laser range finder causing a beam of infra-red light to be scattered from the surface of the object; a time taken for the beam of infra-red light to return to the sensor is indicative of the distance to the surface of the object.
In an embodiment, the vehicle further comprises at least one sensor for determining a distance from at least one of the plurality of detectors to points on the surface of the object; and a processor for processing the obtained radiographic image by using the determined distance of the object to obtain an atomic number of each material contained in the object. In yet another embodiment, the processor causes an intensity correction to be applied to the obtained radiographic image thereby causing intensity of the image of an object located at a distance greater than a predefined distance to be reduced by a predefined factor and intensity of the image of an object located at a distance lesser than a predefined distance to be increased by a predefined factor.
In another embodiment, the plurality of detectors comprise one of: an inorganic scintillation detector such as NaI(TI), and an organic scintillator such as polyvinyl toluene; each detector being coupled with one or more light sensitive readout devices such as a photomultiplier tube or a photodiode. In yet another embodiment, the plurality of detectors comprise semiconductor sensors having a wide bandgap such as, CdTe, CdZnTe or HgI which can operate at room temperature. In a further embodiment, the plurality of detectors comprises semiconductor sensors having a narrow bandgap such as HPGe.
In an embodiment, the covert mobile inspection vehicle further comprises a data acquisition module comprising a plurality of detectors, photomultipliers/photodiodes and analog-to-digital converter circuitry. In another embodiment, the covert mobile inspection vehicle further comprises at least one of: a GPS receiver, a scanning laser, a CCTV camera, an infra-red camera, an audio microphone, a directional RF antenna, a wide-band antenna, a chemical sensor, and a jamming device.
The aforementioned and other embodiments of the present shall be described in greater depth in the drawings and detailed description provided below.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be further appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings:
The present specification is directed towards a covert mobile inspection system, comprising a vehicle, which is equipped with a plurality of multi-modality sensors. Surveillance information from the plurality of sensors is utilized to detect and prevent subversive activities. Thus, the present specification describes a system and method for providing covert and mobile surveillance/inspection of subversive activities using a plurality of multi-modality surveillance sensors.
In addition, the present specification is directed toward using a backscatter X-ray scanning system that has improved threat detection capabilities as at least one of the plurality of surveillance sensors utilized.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, the present specification describes a covert mobile inspection vehicle having an improved on-board backscatter X-ray scanning system and further equipped with a plurality of prevention and inspection components or devices.
In one embodiment, the backscatter X-ray scanning system includes a sensor, such as a scanning laser range finder, that measures the distance of the detectors from the surface of the object under inspection.
Because it is possible to map the equivalent distance between the X-ray beam at any angle and the surface of the object by determining the relative positions of the X-ray source and the laser sensor, in one embodiment, the present specification describes an improved method of generating a radiographic image of the object under inspection, using this known distance to generate an intensity-corrected image at a given equivalent distance. The corrected image is then used to map an effective atomic number of all materials in the radiographic image. Additionally, this distance data is also used to provide an accurate geometric correction in the image to produce a true likeness of the shape of the object under inspection.
In another aspect of the improved method of generating a radiographic image of the object under inspection, adaptive region based averaging is applied (such as by using a statistical filter and/or median filter). This results in an image which has equivalent statistical properties useful in determining an accurate effective atomic number for all regions in the object under investigation. Optionally, the knowledge of effective atomic numbers and their ranges or variations is used to colour code the radiographic image.
In another embodiment, the present specification describes a method for measuring individual X-ray energies as they interact within at least one detector in order to form an analysis of the spectral content of the scattered X-ray beam.
In another embodiment, the backscatter X-ray scanning system additionally uses a multi-element scatter collimator to allow use of fan-beam X-ray irradiation to generate the backscatter image. Therefore, scattered X-rays which lie within an acceptance angle of, for example, the collimator element are detected and associated to the appropriate corresponding part of the generated radiographic X-ray image.
Apart from the X-ray scanner/sensor, the plurality of multi-modality surveillance sensors comprise any or all combinations of components such as UPS receivers, scanning lasers, CCTV cameras, infra-red cameras, audio microphones, directional RF antennas, wide-band antennas, chemical sensors, jamming devices.
In accordance with another embodiment, the present specification describes an automated detection processor for integrating and analysing all surveillance information from the plurality of sensors, in real-time, to highlight threat items for review by an operator seated inside the covert vehicle and/or remotely through a secured wireless network.
The present specification discloses multiple embodiments. The following disclosure is provided in order to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to practice the invention. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. The general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the terminology and phraseology used is for the purpose of describing exemplary embodiments and should not be considered limiting. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope encompassing numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents consistent with the principles and features disclosed. For purpose of clarity, details relating to technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
In one embodiment, the X-ray sensor generates a backscatter radiographic image of an object from a single side utilizing Compton scattering. This allows the vehicle 105 to collect scan data, in a covert fashion, at a low dose to allow scanning of individuals, small as well as large vehicles/cargo for detection of threat devices, materials and individuals.
In another embodiment, the X-ray scanning system allows for scanning of several sides of a vehicle under inspection. For example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/834,890 and Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application Number US10/41757 both entitled “Four-Sided Imaging”, and filed on Jul. 12, 2010 by the Applicant of the present specification, both herein incorporated by reference in their entirety, describe [a] scanning system for the inspection of cargo, comprising: a portal defining an inspection area, said portal comprising a first vertical side, a second vertical side, a top horizontal side, and a horizontal base defined by a ramp adapted to be driven over by a vehicle; a first X-ray source disposed on at least one of the first vertical side, second vertical side or top horizontal side for generating an X-ray beam into the inspection area toward the vehicle; a first set of transmission detectors disposed within the portal for receiving the X-rays transmitted through the vehicle; a second X-ray source disposed within the ramp of said portal for generating an X-ray beam towards the underside of the vehicle; and a second set of detectors disposed within the ramp of said portal for receiving X-rays that are backscattered from the vehicle.
While
In one embodiment, the enclosure and X-ray unit further comprise a first collimator close to the source of X-rays and a second collimator close to the exit, described in greater detail below. Where the X-ray source enclosure is so positioned, detectors 117 are positioned on the interior face of the second side and the interior face of top side and occupy the full height of second side and the full length of top side, proximate to second side.
In another embodiment, the enclosure housing the X-ray is physically attached to the exterior face of the second side and is approximately 1 meter tall. The position of the enclosure depends upon the size of the inspection portal. In one embodiment, the enclosure occupies 20% to 50% of the total height of the first side. As described above with respect to first side, if the enclosure housing the X-ray is on second side, a slit or opening is similarly provided on second side. The detectors are also similarly positioned on the interior faces of top side and first side when the enclosure is on second side. In one embodiment, with a dual-view system, an enclosure housing an X-ray source can be provided on both the first side and second side.
As shown in
Persons of ordinary in the art would appreciate that the signal size due to Compton scattering from objects varies as the inverse fourth power of distance between the X-ray source and the scattering object. It is also known to persons of ordinary skill in the art that low atomic number materials are less efficient at scattering X-rays than high atomic number materials while high atomic number materials are more efficient at absorbing X-rays of a given energy than low atomic number materials. Therefore, the net result is that more X-rays having a greater intensity are scattered from low atomic number materials than from high atomic number materials. However, this effect varies approximately linearly with atomic number while the X-ray signal varies as the inverse fourth power of distance from the source to the scattering object. This also implies that known Compton scatter based radiographic images are essentially binary in nature (scattering or not scattering) since the small but quantitative variation of the signal size due to variation in atomic number is lost in the gross variation in signal intensity caused due to varying distances from X-ray source to scattering points.
To correct for distance, a sensor 220 is provided (adjacent to the X-ray source and detectors) which is capable of detecting the distance to each point at the surface of the object 210. In one embodiment, the sensor 220 is advantageously a scanning laser range finder in which a beam of infra-red light 221 is scattered from the surface of the object 210 and the time taken for the pulsed beam to return to the sensor 220 is indicative of the distance to the surface of the object 210. For example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,356 and Patent Cooperation Treaty Application Number US10/58809, also by the Applicant of the present specification, entitled “Time of Flight Backscatter Imaging System” and filed on Dec. 22, 2010, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety, describes a method in which the time of flight of the X-ray beam to and from the surface of the object under inspection is used to determine the distance between the source and scattering object.
One of ordinary skill in the art would note that the distances between the surface of the object and the planar detector arrays are variable, since the object is not straight sided. Further, since the distance from the X-ray source to the object under inspection is not known in general, an assumption is generally made that the object is planar and at a fixed distance from the source. Thus, if the object is closer than assumed, then the object will appear smaller in the image and conversely, if the object is further away then it will appear to be larger. The result is an image which is representative or the object under inspection but not with correct geometry. This makes it difficult to identify the precise location of a threat or illicit object within the object under inspection.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/959,356 and Patent Cooperation Treaty Application Number US10/58809 address the above problem by integrating time of flight processing into conventional backscatter imaging. X-rays travel at a constant speed which is equal to the speed of light (3×108 m/s). An X-ray will therefore travel a distance of 1 m in 3.3 ns or equivalently, in 1 ns (10−9 s) an X-ray will travel 0.3 m. Thus, if the distance between a backscatter source and the object under inspection is on the order of 1 m, it corresponds to around 3 ns of transit time. Similarly, if the backscatter X-ray detector is also located around 1 m from the surface of the object, it corresponds to an additional 3 ns of transit time. Thus, the signal received at the detector should be received, in this example, 6 ns after the X-ray beam started its transit from the X-ray tube. In sum, the X-ray's transit time is directly related to the detectors' distance to or from the object. Such times, although quite short, can be measured using detection circuits known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The minimum distance is practically associated with the time resolution of the system. Objects can be proximate to the source, but one will not see much scattered signal since the scatter will generally be directed back to the X-ray source rather than to a detector. A practical lower limit, or the minimum distance between the plane of the system and the nearest part of the object to be inspected, is 100 mm. The further away the object is from the detector, the smaller the signal size and thus a practical upper limit for distance is of the order of 5 m.
In the systems of the present application, as shown diagrammatically in
It may be noted that there are different path lengths from the X-ray interaction point (with the object) to the X-ray detector array. Therefore if a large detector is used, there will be a blurring to the start of the step pulse at the detector, where the leading edge of the start of the pulse will be due to signal from the part of the detector which is nearest to the interaction spot, and the trailing edge of the start of the pulse will be due to signal from parts of the detector which are further away from the interaction spot. A practical system can mitigate such temporal blurring of by segmenting the detector such that each detector sees only a small blurring and the changes in response time each provide further enhancement in localisation of the precise interaction position, hence improving the determination of the surface profile of the object under inspection.
The detector size (minimum and/or maximum) that would avoid such blurring effects described above is commensurate with the time resolution of the system. Thus, a system with 0.1 ns time resolution has detectors of the order of 50 mm in size. A system with 1 ns time resolution has detectors of the order of 500 mm in size. Of course, smaller detectors can be used to improve statistical accuracy in the time measurement, but at the expense of reduced numbers of X-ray photons in the intensity signal, so there is a trade-off in a practical system design which is generally constrained by the product of source brightness and scanning collimator diameter.
Referring to
As shown in
Referring now to
In accordance with another aspect of the present application, it is recognized that signal scattered due to objects farther from the X-ray source have poorer signal-to-noise ratio than signal from scattering objects closer to the source. This implies that the distance measurement can be further utilized to implement an adaptive region based averaging method whereby signal from regions far from the source are averaged over a larger region, such that the linear dimension of these regions is scaled as the square of the distance from source to object. This effect is shown in image 315 of
In one embodiment, a suitable statistical filter lists all pixel values within a region (for example a 7×7 block), ranks them in order and then determines the mean value and standard deviation of the central range of values. Any pixel within the whole block whose intensity is more than 2 standard deviations from the mean value within that block is considered to be part of an adjacent object. A range of statistical filters can be developed which may use higher order statistical attributes, such as skewness, to refine the analysis. Alternate methods, such as median filtering, which can mitigate against boundary effects between image features are well known to persons of ordinary skill and all such methods can be suitably applied within the scope of the present invention.
In accordance with yet another aspect described in the present specification, in one embodiment, the individual pixels in image 310 are colored according to the values in the quantitative image 315 scaled by effective atomic number. Here, the distance normalized pixels are colored on an individual basis (to ensure a sharp looking image) based on results from the region averaged image 315 with improved statistics. Alternative schemes can also be used for pixel coloring. For example, pixels with effective atomic number below 10 are colored orange (corresponding to organic materials such as explosives), pixels with effective atomic numbers between 10 and 20 are colored green (corresponding to low atomic number inorganic materials such as narcotics) while materials with effective atomic numbers greater than 20, such as steel, are colored blue. Still alternatively, a rainbow spectrum can be used in, which pixel colored changes from red through yellow, green and blue as effective atomic number increases. Many other color tables can be selected depending on preference and application.
In accordance with further aspect of the present specification, it is recognized that the beam from the X-ray source is diverging from a point which is generally located at least one meter from ground level. This implies that the raw image 305 is actually distorted—with regions at the centre of the image being unnaturally wide compared to regions at the top and bottom of the image which are unnaturally narrow. In conventional methods, a geometric correction is applied according to a cosine-like function which makes the assumption of a flat sided object at a fixed distance from the source. In contrast, in an embodiment of the present invention, the distance data from the scanning laser sensor 220 of
The present invention also lays focus on spectral composition of the X-ray beam that is incident on the object under inspection. Accordingly, in one embodiment it is advantageous to create the X-ray beam using an X-ray tube with cathode-anode potential difference in the range 160 kV to 320 kV with tube current in the range of 1 mA to 50 mA depending on allowable dose to the object under inspection and weight and power budget for the final system configuration. Regardless of tube voltage and current, a broad spectrum of X-ray energies is produced as shown in
It should be noted that as a result of Compton scattering, the X-rays backscattered towards the detectors are generally of lower energy than those interacting in the object itself, and so the scattered beam hits a lower mean energy than the incident beam. Further, the impact of the scattering object is to preferentially filter the X-ray beam—removing more and more of the lower energy components of the beam the higher the effective atomic number of the scattering object. This phenomenon is shown in
Referring back to
Persons of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the data acquisition module (typically comprising detectors, photomultipliers/photodiodes and analog-to-digital converter circuitry and well known to persons skilled in the art) will be synchronized to the position of the primary X-ray bean 206 in order to collect one spectrum for each interacting X-ray source point. For example, the X-ray system 200 may be configured to collect 300 lines per second with 600 pixels per image line. In this case, the equivalent dwell time of the primary X-ray beam at each source point is 1/180000 sec-5.5 μs per point and the detectors need to be capable of recording several hundred X-rays during this time. To achieve the necessary count rates, one embodiment uses a small number of fast responding detectors (such as polyvinyl toluene plastic scintillators with photomultiplier readout) or a larger number of slow responding detectors (such as NaI scintillators with photomultiplier readout), depending upon factors such as cost and complexity.
Given the acquisition of the X-ray spectrum at each sample point and the phenomena described with reference to
As an example, a scattering object far from the detector will produce a naturally faint signal, with the displayed brightness of this object being corrected through the use of known distance information, such as that provided by a scanning laser. Given that the signal for the region is formed from a limited number of scattered X-ray photons, the properties of the signal can be described using Gaussian statistics. Gain correction to account for distance from the source is applied in a linear fashion, and so the region still maintains its original statistical properties even though its mean value has been scaled to a larger value.
As identified in
Further, it should be appreciated that the X-ray scatter data is generally at low energy and often below 100 keV in magnitude. In contrast, gamma-rays from radioactive sources, that may be present in the object under inspection, will typically be at much higher energy (for example Co-60 has gamma-rays at 1.1 and 1.3 MeV while Cs-137 emits gamma rays at 662 keV). As shown in
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/976,861, also by the Applicant of the present invention, entitled “Composite Gamma Neutron Detection System” and filed on Dec. 22, 2010, describes a method for simultaneous detection of gamma-rays and neutrons with pulse shape discrimination to discriminate between the two effects. This method is also applicable to the current invention and is incorporated herein by reference.
As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/976,861, several nuclei have a high cross-section for detection of thermal neutrons. These nuclei include He, Gd, Cd and two particularly high cross-section nuclei: Li-6 and B-10. In each case, after the interaction of a high cross-section nucleus with a thermal neutron, the result is an energetic ion and a secondary energetic charged particle.
For example, the interaction of a neutron with a B-10 nucleus can be characterized by the following equation:
n+B-10→Li-7−He-4(945 barns,Q=4.79 MeV) Equation 1:
Here, the cross section and the Q value, which is the energy released by the reaction, are shown in parenthesis.
Similarly, the interaction of a neutron with a Li-6 nucleus is characterized by the following equation:
n+Li-6→H−1 H−3−He-4(3840 barn,Q=2.79 MeV) Equation 2
It is known that charged particles and heavy ions have a short range in condensed matter, generally travelling only a few microns from the point of interaction. Therefore, there is a high rate of energy deposition around the point of interaction. In the present invention, molecules containing nuclei with a high neutron cross section are mixed with molecules that provide a scintillation response when excited by the deposition of energy. Thus, neutron interaction with Li-6 or B-10, for example, results in the emission of a flash of light when intermixed with a scintillation material. If this light is transported via a medium to a photodetector, it is then possible to convert the optical signal to an electronic signal, where that electronic signal is representative oldie amount of energy deposited during the neutron interaction.
Further, materials such as Cd, Gd and other materials having a high thermal capture cross section with no emission of heavy particles produce low energy internal conversion electrons, Auger electrons, X-rays, and gamma rays ranging in energy from a few keV to several MeV emitted at substantially the same time. Therefore, a layer of these materials, either when mixed in a scintillator base or when manufactured in a scintillator, such as Gadolinium Oxysulfide (GOS) or Cadmium Tungstate (CWO) will produce light (probably less than heavier particles). GOS typically comes with two activators, resulting in slow (on the order of 1 ms) and fast (on the order of 5 μs) decays. CWO has a relatively fast decay constant. Depending on the overall energy, a significant portion of the energy will be deposited in the layer, while some of the electrons will deposit the energy in the surrounding scintillator. In addition, the copious X-rays and gamma rays produced following thermal capture will interact in the surrounding scintillator. Thus, neutron interactions will result in events with both slow and fast decay constants. In many cases, neutron signals will consist of a signal with both slow and fast components (referred to as “coincidence”) due to electron interfacing in the layer and gamma rays interacting in the surrounding scintillator.
The scintillation response of the material that surrounds the Li-6 or B-10 nuclei can be tuned such that this light can be transported through a second scintillator, such as a plastic scintillator in one embodiment, with a characteristic which is selected to respond to gamma radiation only. In another embodiment, the material that surrounds the Li-6 or B-10 is not a scintillator, but a transparent non-scintillating plastic resulting in a detector that is only sensitive to neutrons.
Thus, the plastic scintillator is both neutron and gamma sensitive. When a neutron is thermalized and subsequently captured by the H in the detector, a 2.22 MeV gamma ray is also emitted and often detected. In this manner, the invention disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/976,861 achieves a composite gamma-neutron detector capable of detecting neutrons as well as gamma radiation with high sensitivity. Further, the composite detector also provides an excellent separation of the gamma and neutron signatures. It should be noted herein that in addition to charged particles, B-10 produces gamma rays. Therefore, in using materials that produce gamma rays following neutron capture, the result may be a detection that looks like gamma rays. Most applications, however, want to detect neutrons; thus, the disclosed detector is advantageous in that it also detects the neutrons.
A system configuration according to an embodiment of the invention disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/993,831 is outlined in
In this embodiment, an X-ray backscatter detector 26 is placed close to the edge of the inspection region on the same side as the X-ray linear accelerator 20 but offset to one side of the X-ray beam so that it does not attenuate the transmission X-ray beam itself. As shown in
In contrast to known backscatter imaging detectors which use the localisation of the incident X-ray beam to define the scattering region, the backscatter imaging detector described, is able to spatially correlate the intensity of backscattered X-ray signals with their point of origin regardless of the extended fan-beam shape of the X-ray beam.
In the backscatter imaging detector 26, this spatial mapping is performed using a segmented collimator 28 in zone plate configuration as shown schematically in
However, it is noted that the radiation beam is well collimated in one direction (the width of the radiation fan beam) and therefore the imaging problem is reduced to a one-dimensional rather than a two-dimensional problem. Therefore a backscatter detector in the form of an effectively one dimensional imaging sensor 30 is provided behind the zone plate 28. To address this problem an elemental backscatter detector is used in this embodiment. As shown in
Referring back to
The 2D laser scanner image may also be used to determine when the overall scan of a particular object should start and when the scan for that object is complete.
Also, optical wavelength colour CCTV images are collected at the front and sides of the vehicle, ideally using pan-tilt-zoom capability, to allow clear review of all locutions around the vehicle. In one embodiment, images from the CCTV cameras are analysed to read license plate and container codes and this data is also archived along with the X-ray, GPS and all other surveillance data. Similarly, infra-red cameras can also be used to monitor the scene around the vehicle to look for unexpectedly warm or cold personnel as indication of stress or presence of improvised explosive devices. This data is also archived along with X-ray and all other surveillance data.
In one embodiment, audio microphones at also installed around the vehicle to listen for sounds that are being produced in the vicinity of the vehicle. Specialist microphones with pan-tilt capability are installed to listen to sounds from specific points at some distance from the vehicle, this direction being analysed from the CCTV and IR image data.
Directional RF (Radio Frequency) antennas are installed in the skin of the vehicle to listen for the presence of electronic devices in the vicinity of the vehicle. This data is integrated with the rest of the surveillance data. Similarly, wide band antennas are installed with receiving devices that monitor communications channels that may be used by law enforcement, military and emergency services. Again, RF antennas are installed to monitor mobile phone communications including, text messaging from the local region around the vehicle.
In one embodiment, chemical sensors are also installed to monitor composition of the air around the vehicle to detect trace quantities of explosives, narcotics and other relevant compounds with this data being integrated with that generated by the imaging and other sensors.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, an automated detection processor integrates and analyses all surveillance information from the plurality of sensors 110, in real-time, to highlight threat items for review by an operator seated inside the vehicle 105 and/or remotely through a secured wireless network. In one embodiment, data from the individual sensors is analysed for key signatures. For example, the X-ray data is analysed for detection of improvised explosive devices or for the presence of organic materials in unexpected places (such as the tyres of a car). CCTV data is analysed for license plates with cross-checking against a law enforcement database. Audio information is analysed for key words such as “bomb” or “drugs”, for unexpectedly fast or deliberate phrasing which may indicate stress, or for a non-native language in the presence of a native language background for example. Once a piece of information has been analysed to comprise a threat or risk, this is escalated up a decision tree and is then compared against automated risk analysis from other sensors. If correlated risks are detected, a significant threat alarm is raised for immediate action by a human operator. If no correlated risk is detected, a moderate threat alarm is raised for review by the operator. The result is a managed flow of information where all sensor surveillance information is analysed at all times, and only significant threat information is passed up the decision tree to reach the final level of an alert to a system operator. The detection processor, in one embodiment, is a microprocessor computer running relevant code programmed for managing information and decision flow based on correlation and aggregation of the plurality of surveillance information.
Great Britain Provisional Patent Application Number 1001736.6, entitled “Image Driven Optimization”, and filed on Feb. 3, 2010, and Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application Number GB2011/050182 entitled “Scanning Systems”, and filed on Feb. 3, 2011 by the Applicant of the present specification, both herein incorporated by reference in their entirety disclose a scanner system comprising a radiation generator arranged to generate radiation to irradiate an object, and detection means arranged to detect the radiation after it has interacted with the object and generate a sequence of detector data sets. Referring to
The primary collimator set 12 A acts to constrain the radiation emitted by the source 10 into a substantially fan-shaped beam 18. The beam 18 will typically have a fan angle in the range +/−20 degrees to +/−15 degrees with a width at the detector elements 14 in the range 0.5 mm to 50 mm. The second collimator set 12B is adjustably mounted and the position of the two second collimators 12B can be adjusted by means of actuators 20, under the control of a decision processor 22. The detectors 14 output detector signals indicative of the radiation intensity they detect and these form, after conversion and processing described in more detail below, basic image data that is input to the decision processor 22. The decision processor 22 is arranged to analyse the image data and to control the actuators 20 to control the position of the second collimator set 12B in response to the results of that analysis. The decision processor 22 is also connected to a control input of the radiation source 10 and arranged to generate and vary a control signal it provides to the control input to control the energy and timing of X-ray pulses generated by the radiation source 10. The decision processor 22 is also connected to a display 24 on which an image of the imaged object, generated from the image data, can be displayed.
By way of example, the radiation source 10 may comprise a high energy linear accelerator with a suitable target material (such as tungsten) which produces a broad X-ray spectrum with a typical beam quality in the range from 0.8 MV to 15 MV from a relatively small focal spot typically in the range 1 mm to 10 mm diameter. The radiation source 10 in this case would be pulsed with a pulse repetition frequency generally in the range 5 Hz to 1 kHz where the actual rate of pulsing is determined by the decision processor 22.
The detectors 14 in this case are advantageously fabricated from a set of scintillation crystals (generally high density scintillator such as Csl, Cd04, ZnW04, LSO, GSO and similar are preferred) which are optically coupled to a suitable light detector, such as a photodiode or photomultiplier tube. Signals from these detectors 14 converted to digital values by a suitable electronic circuit (such as a current integrator or trans impedance amplifier with bandwidth filtering followed by an analogue to digital converter) and these digital values of the sampled intensity measurements are transferred to the decision processor 22 for analysis. The primary 12 A and secondary 12B collimators in this case are advantageously fabricated from high density materials such as lead and tungsten.
A plurality of active devices are installed on the vehicle 105 to help mitigate against threats that may be present proximate to the covert inspection vehicle itself. For example, a jamming device can be installed to block mobile phone communication. This device may be turned on automatically in certain situations based on results from the automated decision processor. For example, should an improvised explosive device be detected in the vicinity of the vehicle the jamming device is turned on automatically to block spoken commands to a subversive or to prevent direct communication to the trigger of the explosive device. A jamming device can also be installed to block satellite communications required in order to prevent satellite phone communications that may result in subversive activity.
In one embodiment the covert inspection vehicle 105 is operated by a single person with the primary responsibility for driving the vehicle. Surveillance data can be broadcast back to a central intelligence location in real time, as required, with download of the full archived surveillance data once the vehicle returns to its home location. The automated decision processor can action or trigger appropriate events, depending upon the decision steps programmed therein, without operator intervention to avoid the driver loosing focus on their primary task. In another embodiment, the covert inspection vehicle 105 is also provided with space for another security operative whose task is to monitor the surveillance data stream as it arrives from the plurality of sensors either in parallel with the automated decision processor or as a consequence of information from the automated decision processor. This operator is provided with two way secure wireless communication back to a central intelligence location in order to transact instructions and actions as required.
The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present invention. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.
The present specification is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/368,202, of the same title, and filed on Feb. 7, 2012, which, in turn, relies on U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/440,834, filed on Feb. 8, 2011, and entitled “Covert Surveillance Using Multi-Modality Sensing”, for priority. The aforementioned application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2831123 | Daly | Apr 1958 | A |
2971433 | Akin | Feb 1961 | A |
2972430 | Johnson | Feb 1961 | A |
3374355 | Parratt | Mar 1968 | A |
3676783 | Kinbara | Jul 1972 | A |
3766387 | Heffan | Oct 1973 | A |
3767850 | Mc | Oct 1973 | A |
3770955 | Tomita | Nov 1973 | A |
3784837 | Holmstrom | Jan 1974 | A |
3904923 | Schwartz | Sep 1975 | A |
3961186 | Leunbach | Jun 1976 | A |
3988586 | Stuart | Oct 1976 | A |
4031401 | Jacob | Jun 1977 | A |
4047035 | Dennhoven | Sep 1977 | A |
4064440 | Roder | Dec 1977 | A |
4139771 | Dennhoven | Feb 1979 | A |
4210811 | Dennhoven | Jul 1980 | A |
4216499 | Dennhoven | Aug 1980 | A |
4242583 | Annis | Dec 1980 | A |
4260898 | Annis | Apr 1981 | A |
4315146 | Rudin | Feb 1982 | A |
4342914 | Bjorkholm | Aug 1982 | A |
4366382 | Kotowski | Dec 1982 | A |
4380817 | Harding | Apr 1983 | A |
4420182 | Kaneshiro | Dec 1983 | A |
4430568 | Yoshida | Feb 1984 | A |
4472822 | Swift | Sep 1984 | A |
4503332 | Annis | Mar 1985 | A |
4525854 | Molbert | Jun 1985 | A |
4563707 | Kishida | Jan 1986 | A |
4566113 | Doenges | Jan 1986 | A |
4599740 | Cable | Jul 1986 | A |
4626688 | Barnes | Dec 1986 | A |
4641330 | Herwig | Feb 1987 | A |
4646339 | Rice | Feb 1987 | A |
4709382 | Sones | Nov 1987 | A |
4736401 | Donges | Apr 1988 | A |
4788704 | Donges | Nov 1988 | A |
4799247 | Annis | Jan 1989 | A |
4809312 | Annis | Feb 1989 | A |
4817123 | Sones | Mar 1989 | A |
4825454 | Annis | Apr 1989 | A |
4853595 | Alfano | Aug 1989 | A |
4864142 | Gomberg | Sep 1989 | A |
4870670 | Geus | Sep 1989 | A |
4872188 | Lauro | Oct 1989 | A |
4884289 | Glockmann | Nov 1989 | A |
4975917 | Villa | Dec 1990 | A |
4979202 | Siczek | Dec 1990 | A |
4991189 | Boomgaarden | Feb 1991 | A |
5006299 | Gozani | Apr 1991 | A |
5014293 | Boyd | May 1991 | A |
5022062 | Annis | Jun 1991 | A |
5065418 | Bermbach | Nov 1991 | A |
5076993 | Sawa | Dec 1991 | A |
5091924 | Bermbach | Feb 1992 | A |
5098640 | Gozani | Mar 1992 | A |
5103099 | Bourdinaud | Apr 1992 | A |
5114662 | Gozani | May 1992 | A |
5179581 | Annis | Jan 1993 | A |
5181234 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5182764 | Peschmann | Jan 1993 | A |
5185778 | Magram | Feb 1993 | A |
5202932 | Cambier | Apr 1993 | A |
5221843 | Alvarez | Jun 1993 | A |
5224144 | Annis | Jun 1993 | A |
5237598 | Albert | Aug 1993 | A |
5247561 | Kotowski | Sep 1993 | A |
5253283 | Annis | Oct 1993 | A |
5313511 | Annis | May 1994 | A |
5319547 | Krug | Jun 1994 | A |
5367552 | Peschmann | Nov 1994 | A |
5379334 | Zimmer | Jan 1995 | A |
5391878 | Petroff | Feb 1995 | A |
5394454 | Harding | Feb 1995 | A |
5430787 | Norton | Jul 1995 | A |
5493596 | Annis | Feb 1996 | A |
5524133 | Neale | Jun 1996 | A |
5548123 | Perez-Mendez | Aug 1996 | A |
5548630 | Hell | Aug 1996 | A |
5600303 | Husseiny | Feb 1997 | A |
5600700 | Krug | Feb 1997 | A |
5602894 | Bardash | Feb 1997 | A |
5606167 | Miller | Feb 1997 | A |
5608214 | Baron | Mar 1997 | A |
5638420 | Armistead | Jun 1997 | A |
5642393 | Krug | Jun 1997 | A |
5642394 | Rothschild | Jun 1997 | A |
5666393 | Annis | Sep 1997 | A |
5687210 | Maitrejean | Nov 1997 | A |
5692028 | Geus | Nov 1997 | A |
5692029 | Husseiny | Nov 1997 | A |
5696806 | Grodzins | Dec 1997 | A |
5751837 | Watanabe | May 1998 | A |
5763886 | Schulte | Jun 1998 | A |
5763903 | Mandai | Jun 1998 | A |
5764683 | Swift | Jun 1998 | A |
5768334 | Maitrejean | Jun 1998 | A |
5783829 | Sealock | Jul 1998 | A |
5787145 | Geus | Jul 1998 | A |
5805660 | Perion | Sep 1998 | A |
5838759 | Armistead | Nov 1998 | A |
5903623 | Swift | May 1999 | A |
5910973 | Grodzins | Jun 1999 | A |
5930326 | Rothschild | Jul 1999 | A |
5940468 | Huang | Aug 1999 | A |
5974111 | Krug | Oct 1999 | A |
6018562 | Willson | Jan 2000 | A |
6031890 | Bermbach | Feb 2000 | A |
6058158 | Eiler | May 2000 | A |
6067344 | Grodzins | May 2000 | A |
6078052 | Difilippo | Jun 2000 | A |
6081580 | Grodzins | Jun 2000 | A |
6094472 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6125165 | Warburton | Sep 2000 | A |
6151381 | Grodzins | Nov 2000 | A |
6188747 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192101 | Grodzins | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192104 | Adams | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195413 | Geus | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198795 | Naumann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212251 | Tomura | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216540 | Nelson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218943 | Ellenbogen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236709 | Perry | May 2001 | B1 |
6249567 | Rothschild | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252929 | Swift | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256369 | Lai | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278115 | Annis | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282260 | Grodzins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292533 | Swift | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301326 | Bjorkholm | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6320933 | Grodzins | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347132 | Annis | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356620 | Rothschild | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6418194 | McPherson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421420 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424695 | Grodzins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434219 | Rothschild | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435715 | Betz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442233 | Grodzins | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445765 | Frank | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6448564 | Johnson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453003 | Springer | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453007 | Adams | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456684 | Mun | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459761 | Grodzins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459764 | Chalmers | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473487 | Le | Oct 2002 | B1 |
RE37899 | Grodzins | Nov 2002 | E |
6483894 | Hartick | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507025 | Verbinski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6532276 | Hartick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542574 | Grodzins | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542578 | Ries | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542580 | Carver | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543599 | Jasinetzky | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546072 | Chalmers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552346 | Verbinski | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556653 | Hussein | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6563903 | Kang | May 2003 | B2 |
6567496 | Sychev | May 2003 | B1 |
6580778 | Meder | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584170 | Aust | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6597760 | Beneke | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605473 | Hajduk | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606516 | Levine | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6636581 | Sorenson | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653588 | Gillard-Hickman | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658087 | Chalmers | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663280 | Doenges | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665373 | Kotowski | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665433 | Roder | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6727506 | Mallette | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735279 | Jacobs | May 2004 | B1 |
6763635 | Lowman | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785357 | Bernardi | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6812426 | Kotowski | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816571 | Bijjani | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837422 | Meder | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6839134 | Saito | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6839403 | Kotowski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6843599 | Le | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6876719 | Ozaki | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879657 | Hoffman | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6920197 | Kang | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928141 | Carver | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6965314 | Jerry | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7039159 | Muenchau | May 2006 | B2 |
7045788 | Iwatschenko-Borho | May 2006 | B2 |
7099434 | Adams | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103137 | Seppi | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115875 | Worstell | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7116235 | Alioto | Oct 2006 | B2 |
RE39396 | Swift | Nov 2006 | E |
7151447 | Willms | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7162005 | Bjorkholm | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166844 | Gormley | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7203276 | Arsenault | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207713 | Lowman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215737 | Li | May 2007 | B2 |
7218704 | Adams | May 2007 | B1 |
7238951 | Disdier | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244947 | Polichar | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260255 | Polichar | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277526 | Rifkin | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7308076 | Studer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322745 | Agrawal | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7333587 | De | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352843 | Hu | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369463 | Van Dullemen | May 2008 | B1 |
7372040 | Polichar | May 2008 | B2 |
7379530 | Hoff | May 2008 | B2 |
7400701 | Cason | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7420174 | Kurita | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7453987 | Richardson | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7483511 | Bendahan | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486768 | Allman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505556 | Chalmers | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505557 | Modica | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7517149 | Agrawal | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519148 | Kotowski | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7525101 | Grodzins | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7547888 | Cooke | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551715 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555099 | Rothschild | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7593506 | Cason | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7593510 | Rothschild | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7609807 | Leue | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7649976 | Georgeson | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7720195 | Allman | May 2010 | B2 |
7724869 | Wang | May 2010 | B2 |
7738687 | Tortora | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7741612 | Clothier | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742568 | Smith | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760103 | Frank | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7783003 | Clayton | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783004 | Kotowski | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7800073 | Clothier | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809104 | Foland | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7809109 | Mastronardi | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7817776 | Agrawal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7844028 | Korsunsky | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7860213 | Akery | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7876879 | Morton | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876880 | Kotowski | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7952079 | Neustadter | May 2011 | B2 |
7957506 | Smith | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7963695 | Kotowski | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7995705 | Allman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000436 | Seppi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8031903 | Paresi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8173970 | Inbar | May 2012 | B2 |
8194822 | Rothschild | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8263938 | Bjorkholm | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275091 | Morton | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8389941 | Bendahan | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8389942 | Morton | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8451974 | Morton | May 2013 | B2 |
8502699 | Zerwekh | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8503605 | Morton | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8831176 | Morto | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8903046 | Morton | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8929509 | Morton | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9146201 | Schubert | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9285488 | Arodzero | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9632205 | Morton | Apr 2017 | B2 |
10770195 | Rothschild | Sep 2020 | B2 |
20010016028 | Adams | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20040017888 | Seppi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040086078 | Adams | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125914 | Kang | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141584 | Bernardi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040178339 | Gentile | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040258198 | Carver | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023479 | Grodzins | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050117700 | Peschmann | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135668 | Polichar | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156734 | Zerwekh | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050157842 | Agrawal | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161611 | Disdier | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169421 | Muenchau | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050226383 | Rifkin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050275545 | Alioto | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027751 | Kurita | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060176998 | Korsunsky | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060284094 | Inbar | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070007455 | Juni | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009088 | Edic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070085010 | Letant | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070110215 | Hu | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140423 | Foland | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070172129 | Tortora | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070189454 | Georgeson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210255 | Bjorkholm | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228284 | Polichar | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235655 | Rhiger | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070237294 | Hoff | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070269005 | Chalmers | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272874 | Grodzins | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280416 | Bendahan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070280502 | Paresi | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286337 | Wang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080037707 | Rothschild | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080043913 | Annis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044801 | Modica | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048872 | Frank | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080084963 | Clayton | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128624 | Cooke | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152081 | Cason | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080205594 | Bjorkholm | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080304622 | Morton | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090067575 | Seppi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086907 | Smith | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103686 | Rothschild | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116617 | Mastronardi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090127459 | Neustadter | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140158 | Clothier | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090200480 | Clothier | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090238336 | Akery | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090257555 | Chalmers | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100177868 | Smith | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110019797 | Morton | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110135060 | Morton | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110204243 | Bendahan | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120134473 | Morton | May 2012 | A1 |
20120201354 | Kimura | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130202089 | Schubert | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208857 | Arodzero | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20170358380 | Rothschild | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180294066 | Rothschild | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190346382 | Rothschild | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1745296 | Mar 2006 | CN |
107209282 | Sep 2017 | CN |
0077018 | Apr 1983 | EP |
0176314 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0261984 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0287707 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0864884 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0919186 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1413898 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1135700 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1526392 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1739460 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1254384 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1907831 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2054741 | May 2009 | EP |
1733213 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2049888 | May 2014 | EP |
2084829 | Apr 1982 | GB |
2150526 | Jul 1985 | GB |
2255634 | Nov 1992 | GB |
2277013 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2424065 | Sep 2006 | GB |
2438317 | Nov 2007 | GB |
1998002763 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998003889 | Jan 1998 | WO |
1998020366 | May 1998 | WO |
9855851 | Dec 1998 | WO |
1999039189 | Aug 1999 | WO |
2004010127 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004109331 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005079437 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2005098400 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005121756 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006036076 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006045019 | Apr 2006 | WO |
2006078691 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006095188 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007035359 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007051092 | May 2007 | WO |
2007068933 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2008017983 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2009027667 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009106803 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009141613 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009141615 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2009150416 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2011008718 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011053972 | May 2011 | WO |
2011069024 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011087861 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011095810 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2012058207 | May 2012 | WO |
2012174265 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2014058495 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2016081881 | May 2016 | WO |
2019217596 | Nov 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Mobile X-Ray Inspection Systems, Internet Citation, Feb. 12, 2007, pp. 1-2, URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20070212000928/http://www.bombdetecti- on.com/cat--details.php?catid=20. |
Molchanov P A et al: ‘Nanosecond gated optical sensors for ocean optic applications’ Sensors Applications Symposium, 2006. Proceedings of The 2006 IEEE Houston, Texas,USA Feb. 7-9, 2006, Piscataway, NJ, USA,IEEE, Feb. 7, 2006 (Feb. 7, 2006) , pp. 147-150, XP010917671 ISBN: 978-0-7803-9580-0. |
International Search Report PCT/US2012/024184, dated Jul. 27, 2012, Rapiscan Systems Inc. |
International preliminary report on patentability PCT/US2012/024184, dated Aug. 13, 2013, Rapiscan Systems Inc. |
Chou, C, “Fourier coded-aperture imaging in nuclear medicine”, IEEE Proc. Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 141. No. 3, May 1994, pp. 179-184. |
Mertz, L.N., et al., “Rotational aperture synthesis for x rays”, Journal. Optical Society of America, vol. 3, Dec. 1986, pp. 2167-2170. |
Misso et al., “New developments in radiation detectors and electron multipliers”, 1964, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science pp. 72-75. |
“Mobile X-Ray Inspection Systems” Internet citation Feb. 12, 2007, pp. 1-2, XP007911046 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20070212000928/http://www.bombdetection.co- m/cat.sub.--details.php?catid=20 [retrieved on Jan. 6, 2010]. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200386904 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61440834 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16524455 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 16889638 | US | |
Parent | 15455557 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16524455 | US | |
Parent | 14531460 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15455557 | US | |
Parent | 13368202 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 14531460 | US |