The present disclosure relates to cowl mounting systems for outboard marine drives.
Cowl mounting arrangements are known in the prior art for outboard marine drives propelling a marine vessel, the outboard marine drive having an upper powerhead covered by the upper cowl. The cowl mounting arrangement typically includes front and rear mounts or latches mounting the upper cowl to the outboard marine drive in covering relation to the upper powerhead. The outboard marine drive is subject to impact-strike against a submerged object, e.g. log-strike, during propulsion of the marine vessel. The impact-strike can cause at least one dislodgement force vector tending to dislodge the upper cowl from one or both of the front and rear mounts. In another aspect, the upper cowl is typically a large bulky member with perimeteral spans which may make alignment during assembly a challenge.
The present disclosure arose during continuing development efforts in the above technology.
a is an enlarged view of a portion of
The upper cowl 32 engages both of the front and rear mounts or latches 34, 36 in the mounted condition,
In one embodiment, the marine vessel 24 has port and starboard sides, and the noted port stabilizer fulcrum 40 and starboard stabilizer 38 fulcrum are spaced between the front and rear mounts or latches 34 and 36 at laterally distally opposite port and starboard sides of the upper cowl 32 and preload the upper cowl 32 and to provide upper cowl 32 stability in the mounted condition thereof. In this embodiment, the upper cowl 32 covers the upper powerhead 30 and is removable therefrom. A lower cowl 42 is attached to the outboard marine drive 22, as is known, and is disposed below the upper cowl 32. The upper and lower cowls 32, 42 both have front and rear ends, and port and starboard sides. The port stabilizer fulcrum 40 is on the port side of one of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, for example the upper cowl 32, and engages the port side of the other of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, for example the lower cowl 42. The starboard stabilizer fulcrum 38 is on the starboard side of one of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, for example the upper cowl 32, and engages the starboard side of the other of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, for example for the lower cowl 42. The upper cowl 32 is mounted to the outboard marine drive 22 at front and rear mounts or latches 34 and 36. One of the mounts or latches 34, 36, for example the front mount or latch 34, includes a hook 44,
To attach the upper cowl 32 to the lower cowl 42, the upper cowl 32 is rocked on the starboard and port fulcrums 38 and 40 to engage and preload hook 44 with respect to retainer 46. The upper cowl 32 is further rocked on the port and starboard stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40 until latched by the other of the mounts or latches 34, 36, for example rear latch 36. Engagement of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42 at latch 36 maintains the preload and provides a maintained load on the upper cowl 32. Hook 44 and retainer 46 in the disclosed embodiment are at the front end of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, and the other mount or latch 36 is at the rear end of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42. Rear latch 36 can be a standard latch known in the prior art, for example a Mercury Marine Rear Latch Assembly, Part No. 8M0041031. This orientation could be the opposite, wherein the hook 44 and retainer 46 are on the rear end and the standard latch is at the front end.
In the depicted embodiment, hook 44,
Retainer 46,
Vertical slots 54 and 56 of the retainer 46 have respective stop surfaces 62 and 64,
During assembly, the upper cowl 32 is placed above the lower cowl 42 and in a slightly forward-tilted position,
Referring to the embodiment in
Thus, the unique configuration of and engagement between the hook 44 and retainer 46 in combination with the noted preloading provided by port and starboard stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40 better secures the upper cowl 32 with the lower cowl 42 so that impact-strike that would tend to dislodge the upper cowl 32 from the lower cowl 42 is counteracted. Pivoting of the upper cowl 32 with respect to the lower cowl 42 and across the stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40 engages the hook 44 with the retainer 46 and then applies torque on the hook 44 as the stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40 engage with the lower cowl 42. The noted torque increases as the upper cowl 32 is further pivoted into the mounted condition wherein latch 36 is engaged, as shown in
Starboard and port stabilizer fulcrums 38 and 40 also function as and provide starboard and port alignment guides, respectively, guiding the starboard side of upper cowl 32 into alignment with the starboard side of the lower cowl 42, and guiding the port side of upper cowl 32 into alignment with the port side of the lower cowl 42. In one embodiment, four alignment guides are provided, including two starboard alignment guides 38 and 72,
The port and starboard alignment guides 38, 40, 72, 74 are on the upper cowl 32 and extend downwardly beyond lower perimeteral edge 83,
The disclosed systems provide methods for mounting a cowl on an outboard marine drive propelling a vessel, including in a forward direction, the outboard marine drive having an upper powerhead covered by the cowl and having front and rear mounts for mounting the cowl to the outboard marine drive in covering relation to the upper powerhead. The methods can include engaging the upper cowl 32 with the outboard marine drive 22 at one of the front and rear mounts or latches 34, 36, for example front mount 34, providing stabilizer fulcrums 38 and 40 between the front and rear mounts 34, 36, and pivoting the upper cowl 32 on the stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40 about a pivot-engagement to preload the upper cowl 32,
As discussed herein above, the outboard marine drive 22 can be subject to impact-strike against a submerged object during the propelling of the marine vessel 24, and the impact-strike may cause at least one dislodgement force vector which may tend to dislodge or de-couple the upper cowl 32 from the lower cowl 42. The methods maintain, by use of the stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40, the maintained load on the upper cowl 32 in the mounted condition, including in engagement with the mount 34, 36 against the dislodgement force vector. Upper cowl 32 is rocked on stabilizer fulcrums 38 and 40. The noted dislodgement force vector caused by an impact-strike may release the hook 44 from the retainer 46 but-for the unique configuration of hook 44 and retainer 46 in combination with the preloading provided by the rocking of the upper cowl 32 on the port and starboard stabilizer fulcrums 38, 40.
The methods can include providing the noted port and starboard alignment guides 38, 40 at the noted port and starboard fulcrums 38, 40, and comprising, during rocking of the upper cowl 32, guiding the port side of the upper cowl 32 at the port stabilizer fulcrum 38 and the port alignment guide 38 into alignment with the port side of the lower cowl 42, and during the rocking of the upper cowl 32, guiding the starboard side of the upper cowl 32 at the starboard stabilizer fulcrum 40 and the starboard alignment guide 40 into alignment with the starboard side of the lower cowl 42.
The methods can include providing one of the mounts or latches 34 and 36 as a hook 44 on one of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, and a retainer 46 on the other of the upper and lower cowls 32, 42, providing the hook with a finger 52 engaging the retainer 46 and preventing vertical displacement therefrom,
In the foregoing description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clarity, and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The different configurations, systems, and method steps described herein may be used alone or in combination with other configurations, systems and method steps. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims. Each limitation in the appended claims is intended to invoke interpretation under 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, only if the terms “means for” or “step for” are explicitly recited in the respective limitation.
This application claims the benefit of and priority from Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 61/666,060, filed Jun. 29, 2012, hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3955526 | Kusche | May 1976 | A |
4216984 | Hofmann et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4348194 | Walsh | Sep 1982 | A |
4600396 | Crane et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4800854 | Boda et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4844031 | Boda et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4860703 | Boda et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4867120 | Boda et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871333 | Curtis et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4875883 | Slattery | Oct 1989 | A |
4878468 | Boda et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4927194 | Wagner | May 1990 | A |
4930790 | Sheridan | Jun 1990 | A |
4932909 | Curtis et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5025763 | Watanabe | Jun 1991 | A |
5120248 | Daleiden et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5338236 | Dunham et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5487687 | Idzikowski et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
6080025 | Isogawa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6179350 | Ely et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6283806 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6659817 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6663450 | Walczak et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669517 | Alby et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682379 | Walczak et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6840827 | Vignau | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6991500 | Gulko et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7201623 | Krupp et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7267592 | Ingebritson et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7938704 | Nomura et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8011982 | Baier et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
20050191915 | Nakamura | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61666060 | Jun 2012 | US |