This relates generally to computers that have general purpose processors and graphics processing units.
The memory used by user applications running on the general purpose or central processing unit and the memory used by a graphics processing unit are typically separated. A graphics processing unit driver copies data from the user space into driver memory for processing on a graphics processing unit. In a shared virtual memory model, data is not copied to the graphics processing unit, but, instead, it is shared between the graphics processing unit and the central processing unit.
Currently, in multithreaded applications, shared data is protected by locks called mutexes. Each thread that wants to access shared data must first lock a corresponding mutex to prevent other threads from accessing that mutex. This locking can be done through “spinning” on lock, but this technique is not efficient from power and performance points of view.
To optimize the central processing unit, the operating system provides system calls that allow a thread to sleep until a mutex is available and then notifies other threads when a mutex is unlocked. But this mechanism works only for threads that run on central processing unit cores.
For each thread group running on a graphics processor, an auxiliary shadow thread running on the central processing unit may be created, in one embodiment. When a thread running on the graphics processing unit wants to lock a mutex, if it wants to wait until the thread is freed by another task, the graphics thread sends a request to a shadow thread on the central processing unit. The shadow thread on the central processing unit issues the corresponding system called to the operating system. When the operating system gives a lock to the shadow thread, the shadow thread sends the notification to the thread on the graphics processing unit.
While the term graphics processing unit is used in the present application, it should be understood that the graphics processing unit may or may not be a separate integrated circuit. The present invention is applicable to situations where the graphics processing unit and the central processing unit are integrated into one integrated circuit. As used herein, a processor or processing unit may be a processor, controller, or coprocessor.
Referring to
As shown in
The graphics processing unit 18 includes, in user level 12, a gthread 28 which sends control and synchronization messages to the operating system (pOS) 30 and receives messages from the operating system 30. A gthread is user code that runs on the graphics processing unit, sharing virtual memory with the parent thread running on the central processing unit. The operating system 30 may be a relatively small operating system, running on the graphics processing unit, that is responsible for graphics processing unit exceptions. It is a small relative to the host operating system 24, as one example.
User applications 20 are any user process that runs on the central processing unit 16. The user applications 20 spawn threads on the graphics processing unit 18.
An eXtended Threaded Library or XTL is an extension to create and manage user threads on the graphics processing unit. This library creates the shadow thread for each gthread and has library functions for synchronization.
User applications offload computations to the graphics processing unit using an extension of a traditional multithreaded model such as:
The gthread or worker thread created on the graphics processing unit shares virtual memory with the parent thread. It behaves in the same way as a regular thread in that all standard inter-process synchronization mechanisms, such as Mutex and semaphore, can be used. At the same time, a new shadow thread is created on the host central processing unit 16. This shadow thread works as a proxy for exception handling units and synchronization between threads on the central processing unit and the graphics processing unit.
In some embodiments, the parent thread, the host shadow thread and the graphics processing unit worker threads may share virtual memory as shown in
Referring to
Continuing in
In the operating system 30, the SYSCALL is received. The operating system 30 sends a message to the driver called PassHostCommand. The PassHostCommand includes an op code of SYSCALL and a data address plus operation, as indicated in block 50. Then the operating system 30 puts the calling thread to sleep, as indicated in block 54. The calling thread then goes to idle, as indicated in block 56.
The driver 26 in the central processing unit 16 transfers the message to the Xthread 22 using a transfer command. In the Xthread 22, the transfer command is received. The xthread waited for this message from the driver, as indicated at block 44. Then the Xthread performs the mutex lock, as indicated in block 46 and may include an SYSCALL to the host operating system 24. The operating system 24 waits until the mutex is acquired, (i.e. there is a context switch), as indicated at 42. After the mutex was acquired, the Xthread sends a resume execution command to the driver 26 and then waits for the next message from the driver, as indicated in block 48. The driver 26 receives the resume execution command and sends a message PassGpuCommand to the operating system 30 in the graphics processing unit. The PassGpuCommand may include an op code of resume execution with no data, as indicated in block 52.
The operating system 30 wakes up the thread, as indicated in block 58, and sends a resume from SYSCAL to the gthread 28. As a result, the gthread 28 continues working, as indicated in block 62. The shadow thread may also be used to release a mutex.
The computer system 130, shown in
In the case of a software implementation, the pertinent code may be stored in any suitable semiconductor, magnetic, or optical memory, including the main memory 132 (as indicated at 139) or any available memory within the graphics processor. Thus, in one embodiment, the code to perform the sequences of
The graphics processing techniques described herein may be implemented in various hardware architectures. For example, graphics functionality may be integrated within a chipset. Alternatively, a discrete graphics processor may be used. As still another embodiment, the graphics functions may be implemented by a general purpose processor, including a multicore processor.
References throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one implementation encompassed within the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrase “one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be instituted in other suitable forms other than the particular embodiment illustrated and all such forms may be encompassed within the claims of the present application.
While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the true spirit and scope of this present invention.
This application is a continuation application claiming priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/193,779 filed Jul. 29, 2011 hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5440746 | Lentz | Aug 1995 | A |
7631309 | Wilt et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7773090 | Diard et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8368701 | Paltashev et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8413151 | Stratton et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
20040230794 | England et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060117316 | Cismas et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070136730 | Wilt | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070222798 | Kuno | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090327662 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100118041 | Chen | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122259 | Gosalia et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100153686 | Frank | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110067038 | Troccoli | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110161974 | Kurabayashi | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130125133 | Schuster | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1523500 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101398753 | Apr 2009 | CN |
1818874 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101685391 | Mar 2010 | CN |
102103567 | Aug 2011 | CN |
106648552 | May 2017 | CN |
3211525 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2003233508 | Aug 2003 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action from CN Application No. 201280037791.4, dated Jan. 18, 2017, 4 pages. |
Office Action from EP Application No. 12 819 390.1-1906, dated Mar. 8, 2016, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from JP Application No. 2014-522839, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 2 pages. |
Office Action from JP Application No. 2014-522839, dated Mar. 3, 2015, 2 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from JP Application No. 2014-522839, dated Nov. 4, 2015, 2 pages. |
European Search Report from counterpart European Patent Application No. EP12819390.1, dated Apr. 16, 2015, 7 pages. |
Shucai Xiao, et al., “On the Robust Mapping of Dynamic Programming onto a Graphics Processing Unit,” 2009 15th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2009 IEEE, pp. 26-33. |
Shucai Xiao, et al., “Inter-Block GPU Communication via Fast Barrier Synchronization,” 2010 IEEE, 12 pages. |
Wu-Chun Feng, et al., “To GPU Synchronize or Not GPU Synchronize?,” 2010 IEEE, pp. 3801-3804. |
Chinese Office Action issued in corresponding CN Patent Application No. 201280037791.4, dated Apr. 28, 2016, 9 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT/US2012/044805, dated Jan. 25, 2013, 9 pages. |
Liu, et al., “A Balanced Programming Model for Emerging Heterogeneous Multicore Systems,” 6 pages. |
Office Action from JP Application No. 2016-090769, dated May 9, 2017, 2 pages. |
Office Acton from EP Application No. 12 819 390.1-1906, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 6 pages. |
Application No. 201280037791.4, Office Action, 11 pages, dated Aug. 14, 2017. |
Application No. JP2016-090769, Notice of Allowance, 4 pages, dated Sep. 4, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170018051 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13193779 | Jul 2011 | US |
Child | 15278316 | US |