Crack resistant solar cell modules

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9035172
  • Patent Number
    9,035,172
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 26, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 19, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A crack resistant solar cell module includes a protective package mounted on a frame. The protective package includes a polyolefin encapsulant that protectively encapsulates solar cells. The polyolefin has less than five weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in the backbone or side chain. In other words, the combined weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in any location in the molecular structure of the polyolefin is less than five. The polyolefin also has a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa second at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) before any thermal processing of the polyolefin. The protective package includes a top cover, the encapsulant, and a backsheet. The solar cell module allows for shipping, installation, and maintenance with less risk of developing cracks on the surfaces of the solar cells.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the subject matter described herein relate generally to solar cell modules. More particularly, embodiments of the subject matter relate to solar cell module structures and manufacturing processes.


BACKGROUND

Solar cells are well known devices for converting solar radiation to electrical energy. A solar cell has a front side that faces the sun during normal operation to collect solar radiation and a backside opposite the front side. Solar radiation impinging on the solar cell creates electrical charges that may be harnessed to power an external electrical circuit, such as a load.


Solar cells may be serially connected and packaged together to form a solar cell module. The packaging provides environmental protection for the solar cells. Prior to operation in the field, such as in a residential home, commercial structure, or photovoltaic power plant, solar cell modules may be subjected to rough handling during shipping, installation, and maintenance. Embodiments of the present invention pertain to solar cell modules with features that prevent cracks from developing on solar cells.


BRIEF SUMMARY

In one embodiment, a crack resistant solar cell module includes a protective package mounted on a frame. The protective package includes a polyolefin encapsulant that protectively encapsulates solar cells. The polyolefin has less than five weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in the backbone or side chain. In other words, the combined weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in any location in the molecular structure of the polyolefin is less than five. The polyolefin also has a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa second at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) before any thermal processing (e.g., lamination) of the polyolefin. The protective package includes a top cover, the encapsulant, and a backsheet. The solar cell module allows for shipping, installation, and maintenance with less risk of developing cracks on the surfaces of the solar cells.


These and other features of the present invention will be readily apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the entirety of this disclosure, which includes the accompanying drawings and claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the subject matter may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in conjunction with the following figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar elements throughout the figures. The figures are not drawn to scale.



FIG. 1 schematically shows a plan view of a portion of an example solar cell module with fern cracks.



FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a solar cell module in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIGS. 3-5 are cross-sectional views schematically illustrating a method of making a solar cell module in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a method manufacturing a solar cell module in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the present disclosure, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of components, materials, and methods, to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details. In other instances, well-known details are not shown or described to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.



FIG. 1 schematically shows a plan view of a portion of an example solar cell module 150 with fern cracks. The solar cell module 150 includes a plurality of solar cells 151 (i.e., 151-1, 151-2, 151-3, 151-4, etc.) that are mounted on a frame 152. There are many solar cell modules 151 in the solar cell module 150, but only some in the upper left corner are shown for clarity of illustration.


In general, solar cell modules are shipped from their source, such as a warehouse or factory, to the job site where the solar cell modules will be installed and operated. The solar cell modules may be subjected to rough handling as they are loaded and unloaded during shipment. At the job site, the solar cell modules may be subjected to further rough handling before or during installation and during maintenance. For example, prior to installation, the solar cell modules may be left on the floor where they may be stepped on by installers and other workers. Some installers may also ignore proper handling instructions.


In the example of FIG. 1, some of the solar cells 151 have fern cracks 152. The fern cracks 152 may be caused by rough handling and repeated mechanical stress in the field. The fern cracks 152 are so named because they usually, but not necessarily, branch out and extend on the surface of the damaged solar cell 151. In the example of FIG. 1, the solar cells 151-1, 151-2, and 151-4 (but not the solar cell 151-3) have fern cracks 152. The fern cracks 152 may induce hot solar cells and may result in power loss.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is shown a perspective view of a solar cell module 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The solar cell module 100 is a so-called “terrestrial solar cell module” in that it is designed for use in stationary applications, such as on rooftops or by photovoltaic power plants. In the example of FIG. 2, the solar cell module 100 includes an array of interconnected solar cells 101. Only some of the solar cells 101 are labeled in FIG. 2 for clarity of illustration. In the example of FIG. 2, the solar cells 101 comprise backside contact solar cells. In a backside contact solar cell, all diffusion regions and metal contacts coupled to the diffusion regions are formed on the backside of the solar cell. That is, both the P-type and N-type diffusion regions and metal contacts coupled to them are on the backside of the solar cell. In other embodiments, the solar cells 101 comprise front contact solar cells where one polarity of diffusion regions (e.g., N-type diffusion regions) are on the front side of the solar cells, and the opposite polarity of diffusion regions (e.g., P-type diffusion regions) are on the backside of the solar cells.


Visible in FIG. 2 are the front sides of the solar cells 101. The front sides of the solar cells 101 are also referred to as the “sun side” because they face towards the sun during normal operation. The backsides of the solar cells 101 are opposite the front sides. A frame 102 provides mechanical support for the solar cells 101. The front portion 103 of the solar cell module 100 is on the same side as the front sides of the solar cells 101 and is visible in FIG. 2. The back portion 104 of the solar cell module 100 is under the front portion 103. The back portion 104 of the solar cell module 100 is on the same side as the backsides of the solar cells 101.



FIGS. 3-5 are cross-sectional views schematically illustrating a method of making a solar cell module 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is an exploded view showing the components of the solar cell module 100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The solar cell module 100 may comprise a transparent top cover 251, sheets of encapsulant 252, the solar cells 101, interconnects 254, and a backsheet 253. The sheet of encapsulant 252 on the front portion 103 is labeled as “252-1” and the sheet of encapsulant 252 on the back portion 104 is labeled as “252-2.” The transparent top cover 251 and the front side encapsulant 252-1 serve as front side packaging components, and the backside encapsulant 252-2 and the backsheet 253 serve as backside packaging components. In the example of FIG. 3, the transparent top cover 251 is the outermost front side packaging component and the backsheet 253 is the outermost backside packaging component.


The transparent top cover 251 and the encapsulant 252 comprise optically transparent materials. The transparent top cover 251, which is the topmost layer on the front portion 103, protects the solar cells 101 from the environment. The solar cell module 100 is installed in the field such that the transparent top cover 251 faces the sun during normal operation. The front sides of the solar cells 101 face towards the sun by way of the transparent top cover 101. In the example of FIG. 3, the transparent top cover 201 comprises glass (e.g., 3.2 mm thick, soda lime glass).


The encapsulant 252 protectively encapsulates the solar cells 101. The inventors discovered that there is a correlation between fern cracks and the type of encapsulant employed. At the material level, the inventors also discovered that the viscosity of the encapsulant is critical to control the degree or severity of the fern crack. These discoveries are unexpected in that the characteristics of the encapsulant, instead of the solar cells themselves, need to be addressed to mitigate fern cracks on the solar cells. In embodiments of the present invention, the characteristics of the encapsulant 252 are optimized to reduce occurrence of fern cracks on the solar cells 101.


In one embodiment, the encapsulant 252 comprises polyolefin. Examples of suitable polyolefin include polyethylene, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, and polypropylene. In one embodiment, to guard against fern cracks, the encapsulant 252 comprises polyolefin that has less than 5 weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in the backbone or side chain. In other words, the combined weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in any location in the molecular structure of the polyolefin is less than five. In one embodiment, the polyolefin further has a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa-s (Pascal second) at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) before lamination or any other thermal processing. The volume resistivity of the polyolefin of the encapsulant 252 is preferably at least 1015 Ohm-cm as measured by ASTM D257 test at 1 kV, 10 min electrification, and 60° C. As is well known, ASTM D257 is a standard by ASTM International, which is formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials.


The interconnects 254 may comprise a metal for electrically interconnecting the solar cells 101. In the example of FIG. 3, the solar cells 101 comprise serially-connected backside contact solar cells, and the interconnects 254 electrically connect to corresponding P-type and N-type diffusion regions on the backsides of the solar cells 101. The solar cells 101 may also comprise serially-connected front contact solar cells, in which case the interconnects 254 would connect to diffusion regions on the backside and front side of the solar cells.


The backsides of the solar cells 101 face the backsheet 253. The backsheet 253 may be any single layer or multiple layers of materials that provide environmental protection to other components of the solar cell module 100. For example, flouropolymer, polyvinylidene fluoride, polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, polyphenylene sulfide, polyester, polycarbonate, or polyphenylene oxide may be used as a single layer or as part of multiple layers of backsheet. The backsheet 253 is on the back portion 104.


In one embodiment, the transparent top cover 251, the encapsulant 252-1 on the front side, the solar cells 101 electrically connected by the interconnects 254, the encapsulant 252-2 on the backside, and the backsheet 253 are formed together to create a protective package. This is illustrated in FIG. 4, where the aforementioned components are formed together in the stacking order of FIG. 3. More particularly, the solar cells 101 are placed between the encapsulants 252-1 and 252-2, the backsheet 253 is placed under the encapsulant 252-2, and the transparent top cover 251 is placed over the encapsulant 252-1. The just mentioned components are then pressed and heated together by vacuum lamination, for example. The lamination process melts together the sheet of encapsulant 252-1 and the sheet of encapsulant 252-2 to encapsulate the solar cells 101. In FIG. 4, the encapsulant 252-1 and the encapsulant 252-2 are simply labeled as “252” to indicate that that they have been melted together.



FIG. 5 shows the protective package of FIG. 4 mounted on the frame 102. Being encapsulated in the encapsulant 252, the solar cells 101 are electrically isolated from the frame 102.


Tables 1, 2, and 3 discussed below show the effectiveness of the above disclosed encapsulants in preventing fern cracks.


Table 1 shows the complex viscosity of various polyolefin encapsulants (Sample 1, Sample 2, Sample 3, and Sample 4) at various temperatures measured at 1/s shear rate by dynamic mechanical analysis. Table 1 shows complex viscosity in Pascal second (Pa-s). The viscosities were measured before any thermal processing of the encapsulants, which in this example is before lamination.













TABLE 1





Temperature (° C.)
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Sample 4



















50
7.0E+04
8.3E+04
9.5E+03
8.4E+04


90
2.9E+04
4.1E+04
2.4E+03
7.3E+03


130
1.6E+04
4.7E+03
1.6E+03
2.3E+03


140
1.5E+04
4.3E+03
1.5E+03
2.3E+03


150
1.3E+04
3.3E+03
1.5E+03
2.3E+03









As shown in Table 1, the polyolefin encapsulants referred to as “Sample 3” and “Sample 4” have a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa-s at 90° C. Samples 3 and 4 have the characteristics of encapsulants in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. The polyolefin encapsulants referred to as “Sample 1” and “Sample 2” have complex viscosities greater than 10,000 Pa-s at 90° C., and therefore do not have the characteristics for preventing fern cracks.


Table 2 shows the relative probability of developing fern cracks on the solar cells when using the above-noted samples of polyolefin encapsulants. More particularly, as noted in Table 2, studies performed by the inventors indicate that solar cells encapsulated by Sample 1 are four times more likely to develop cracks compared to solar cells encapsulated by Sample 3. Similarly, solar cells encapsulated by Sample 2 are three times more likely to develop cracks compared to solar cells encapsulated by Sample 3.











TABLE 2







Relative Probability of Cracking Cell



















Sample 1
4x



Sample 2
3x



Sample 3
1x




(baseline)










Table 3 shows relative power degradation of solar cells encapsulated by Sample 2, Sample 3, and Sample 4 in a stress test where a person stepped on the solar cell modules. The stress test simulates foot traffic during installation or cleaning process in the field. A person weighing 85 kg stepped on all of the solar cells of the module in the first test. In a second test, a person weighing 120 kg stepped on all of the solar cells of the module.












TABLE 3








Relative power



Relative power
degradation for



degradation for 85 kg
120 kg person



person stepping on
stepping on solar



solar cell module
cell module




















Sample 2
5.7x
15x



Sample 3
1x (baseline)
 1x (baseline)



Sample 4
0.6x
 0.6x










As shown in Table 3, solar cells encapsulated by Sample 2 exhibited much higher power degradation compared to solar cells encapsulated by either Sample 3 or Sample 4. The difference in relative power degradation of the solar cells increased when a heavier person walked on the solar cell modules.



FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram of a method of manufacturing a solar cell module in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The method of FIG. 6 includes providing an encapsulant for a solar cell module (step 301). In one embodiment, the encapsulant comprises polyolefin having less than five weight percent of oxygen and nitrogen in the backbone or side chain, and having a complex viscosity that is less than 10,000 Pascal second at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis before lamination or any thermal processing. The polyolefin encapsulant may also have a volume resistivity of at least 1015 Ohm-cm as measured by ASTM D257 test at 1 kV, 10 min. electrification, and 60° C.


Solar cells to be included in the solar cell module are protectively packaged in the encapsulant (step 302). In one embodiment, the solar cells are placed between sheets (e.g., a bottom sheet and a top sheet) of the encapsulant, a backsheet is placed under a bottom sheet of the encapsulant, and a transparent top cover is placed over a top sheet of the encapsulant. The transparent top cover, the solar cells sandwiched by the sheets of the encapsulant, and the backsheet are then pressed and heated together by vacuum lamination, for example. The resulting protective package is then mounted on a frame (step 303). The manufactured solar cell module is resistant to fern cracks, reducing the chance of damaging the solar cells contained therein during shipping, installation, and maintenance.


Crack resistant solar cell modules and method of manufacturing same have been disclosed. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been provided, it is to be understood that these embodiments are for illustration purposes and not limiting. Many additional embodiments will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art reading this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A solar cell module comprising: a plurality of solar cells;an encapsulant encapsulating the plurality of solar cells, the encapsulant comprising polyolefin having less than 5 weight percent oxygen and nitrogen in a backbone or side chain, the polyolefin having a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa-s at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis before any thermal processing of the encapsulant;a transparent top cover on a front portion of the solar cell module, the front portion facing the sun during normal operation; anda backsheet on a back portion of the solar cell module,wherein the polyolefin comprises polyethylene.
  • 2. The solar cell module of claim 1 wherein the polyolefin has a volume resistivity of at least 1015 Ohm-cm as measured by ASTM D257 test at 1 kV, 10 min electrification, and 60° C.
  • 3. The solar cell module of claim 1 further comprising: a frame, and wherein the transparent top cover, the encapsulant encapsulating the plurality of solar cells, and the backsheet are mounted on the frame.
  • 4. The solar cell module of claim 3 wherein the plurality of solar cells are electrically isolated from the frame.
  • 5. The solar cell module of claim 1 wherein the plurality of solar cells comprises backside contact solar cells.
  • 6. A solar cell module comprising: a plurality of solar cells;a protective package comprising an encapsulant that encapsulates the plurality of solar cells, the encapsulant comprising polyolefin having less than 5 weight percent oxygen and nitrogen in a backbone or side chain; anda frame on which the protective packaging is mounted,wherein the polyolefin comprises polyethylene.
  • 7. The solar cell module of claim 6 wherein the polyolefin has a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa-s at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis before any thermal processing of the encapsulant.
  • 8. The solar cell module of claim 6 wherein the polyolefin has a volume resistivity of at least 1015 Ohm-cm as measured by ASTM D257 test at 1 kV, 10 min electrification, and 60° C.
  • 9. The solar cell module of claim 6 wherein the protective packaging comprises: a transparent top cover;the encapsulant encapsulating the plurality of solar cells; anda backsheet.
  • 10. A solar cell module comprising: a plurality of solar cells;an encapsulant encapsulating the plurality of solar cells, the encapsulant comprising polyolefin having less than 5 weight percent oxygen and nitrogen in a backbone or side chain, the polyolefin having a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa-s at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis before any thermal processing of the encapsulant;a transparent top cover on a front portion of the solar cell module, the front portion facing the sun during normal operation; anda backsheet on a back portion of the solar cell module,wherein the polyolefin comprises polypropylene.
  • 11. The solar cell module of claim 10 wherein the polyolefin has a volume resistivity of at least 1015 Ohm-cm as measured by ASTM D257 test at 1 kV, 10 min electrification, and 60° C.
  • 12. The solar cell module of claim 10 further comprising: a frame, and wherein the transparent top cover, the encapsulant encapsulating the plurality of solar cells, and the backsheet are mounted on the frame.
  • 13. The solar cell module of claim 12 wherein the plurality of solar cells are electrically isolated from the frame.
  • 14. The solar cell module of claim 10 wherein the plurality of solar cells comprises backside contact solar cells.
  • 15. A solar cell module comprising: a plurality of solar cells;a protective package comprising an encapsulant that encapsulates the plurality of solar cells, the encapsulant comprising polyolefin having less than 5 weight percent oxygen and nitrogen in a backbone or side chain; anda frame on which the protective packaging is mounted,wherein the polyolefin comprises polypropylene.
  • 16. The solar cell module of claim 15 wherein the polyolefin has a complex viscosity less than 10,000 Pa-s at 90° C. as measured by dynamic mechanical analysis before any thermal processing of the encapsulant.
  • 17. The solar cell module of claim 15 wherein the polyolefin has a volume resistivity of at least 1015 Ohm-cm as measured by ASTM D257 test at 1 kV, 10 min electrification, and 60° C.
  • 18. The solar cell module of claim 15 wherein the protective packaging comprises: a transparent top cover;the encapsulant encapsulating the plurality of solar cells; anda backsheet.
US Referenced Citations (108)
Number Name Date Kind
3961997 Chu Jun 1976 A
4070097 Gelber et al. Jan 1978 A
4084099 Harvey et al. Apr 1978 A
4278831 Riemer et al. Jul 1981 A
4427839 Hall Jan 1984 A
4478879 Baraona et al. Oct 1984 A
4496788 Hamakawa et al. Jan 1985 A
4509248 Spitzer et al. Apr 1985 A
4665277 Sah et al. May 1987 A
4927770 Swanson May 1990 A
4939217 Stricklen Jul 1990 A
5030295 Swanson et al. Jul 1991 A
5043375 Henning et al. Aug 1991 A
5053083 Sinton Oct 1991 A
5057439 Swanson et al. Oct 1991 A
5066340 Iwamoto et al. Nov 1991 A
5164019 Sinton Nov 1992 A
5213628 Noguchi et al. May 1993 A
5217539 Fraas et al. Jun 1993 A
5266125 Rand et al. Nov 1993 A
5360990 Swanson Nov 1994 A
5369291 Swanson Nov 1994 A
5391235 Inoue Feb 1995 A
5447576 Willis Sep 1995 A
5468652 Gee Nov 1995 A
5512757 Cederstrand et al. Apr 1996 A
5641362 Meier Jun 1997 A
5660646 Kataoka et al. Aug 1997 A
5726391 Iyer et al. Mar 1998 A
5728230 Komori et al. Mar 1998 A
5918140 Wickboldt et al. Jun 1999 A
6013582 Ionov et al. Jan 2000 A
6096968 Schlosser et al. Aug 2000 A
6118258 Farine et al. Sep 2000 A
6130379 Shiotsuka et al. Oct 2000 A
6143976 Endros Nov 2000 A
6147297 Wettling et al. Nov 2000 A
6210991 Wenham et al. Apr 2001 B1
6262359 Meier et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274402 Verlinden et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274404 Hirasawa et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278054 Ho et al. Aug 2001 B1
6311436 Mimura et al. Nov 2001 B1
6313395 Crane et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319596 Kernander et al. Nov 2001 B1
6333457 Mulligan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6337283 Verlinden et al. Jan 2002 B1
6387726 Verlinden et al. May 2002 B1
6423568 Verlinden et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429037 Wenham et al. Aug 2002 B1
6465724 Garvison et al. Oct 2002 B1
6521825 Miura et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524880 Moon et al. Feb 2003 B2
6552414 Horzel et al. Apr 2003 B1
6692985 Huang et al. Feb 2004 B2
6777610 Yamada et al. Aug 2004 B2
6872321 Thavarajah et al. Mar 2005 B2
6998288 Smith et al. Feb 2006 B1
7135350 Smith et al. Nov 2006 B1
7217883 Munzer May 2007 B2
7238594 Fonash et al. Jul 2007 B2
7280235 Lapstun et al. Oct 2007 B2
7281786 Silverbrook Oct 2007 B2
7292368 Rozzi Nov 2007 B2
7306307 Lapstun et al. Dec 2007 B2
7306325 Silverbrook et al. Dec 2007 B2
7309020 Anderson et al. Dec 2007 B2
7322669 Berry et al. Jan 2008 B2
7322673 Silverbrook et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328966 Silverbrook Feb 2008 B2
7335555 Gee et al. Feb 2008 B2
7341328 Berry et al. Mar 2008 B2
7357476 Berry et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390961 Aschenbrenner et al. Jun 2008 B2
7468485 Swanson Dec 2008 B1
7517709 Borden Apr 2009 B1
7554031 Swanson et al. Jun 2009 B2
7633006 Swanson Dec 2009 B1
7786375 Swanson et al. Aug 2010 B2
8188363 Xavier et al. May 2012 B2
20020020440 Yoshimine et al. Feb 2002 A1
20030070707 King et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076649 Speakman Apr 2003 A1
20030134469 Horzel et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030178056 Hikosaka et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040200520 Mulligan et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040261840 Schmit et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050178428 Laaly et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050268963 Jordan et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060130891 Carlson Jun 2006 A1
20060157103 Sheats et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060196535 Swanson et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060201545 Ovshinsky et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070082206 Hartig Apr 2007 A1
20070151598 De Ceuster et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070269750 Irving et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080199690 Hayes et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090205712 Cousins Aug 2009 A1
20100047589 Ochs et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100075234 Cousins Mar 2010 A1
20100108128 Chu et al. May 2010 A1
20100108143 Hayes May 2010 A1
20100139740 Xavier et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100139764 Smith Jun 2010 A1
20100175743 Gonzalez et al. Jul 2010 A1
20110183442 Oi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120184676 Gahleitner et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120266943 Li Oct 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
102006048216 Apr 2008 DE
Non-Patent Literature Citations (23)
Entry
P.J. Verlinden, et al. “One-Year Comparison of a Concentrator Module with Silicon Point-Contact Solar Cell to a Fixed Flat Plate Module in Northern California”, 2000, 4 sheet, Proceedings of the 16th EPSEC.
Richard M. Swanson, “The Promise of Concentrators”, 2000, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 8, pp. 93-111 (2000), Sunpower Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA.
Ronald A. Sinton, et al. “Simplified Backside-Contact Solar Cells”, Feb. 1990, pp. 348-352, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 37. No. 2.
Ronald A. Sinton, “Device Physics and Characterization of Silicon Point-Contact Solar Cells”, Feb. 1997, pp. 1-154, Stanford Electronics Laboratories, Stanford University, CA.
Richard Roland King, “Studies of Oxide-Passivated Emitters in Silicon and Applications to Solar Cells”, Aug. 1990, pp. 1-200, (Thesis) Electrical Engineering Department of Stanford University, CA.
Eric Fogarassy, et al. “Long-Pulse Excimer Laser Crystallization and Doping for the Fabrication of High Performance Polysilicon TFTs”, Jan. 2006, pp. S40-S46, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 48.
Ted Kamins, “Polycrystalline Silicon for Integrated Circuit Applications” third printing 1994, pp. 198-199, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.
J.Y. Lee, et al. “Boron-Back Surface Field With Spin-On Dopants by Rapid Thermal Processing”, Jun. 2004, pp. 998-1001, 19th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Paris, France.
B. Lee et al. “Thermally conductive and electrically insulating EVA composite encapsulants for solar photovoltaic (PV) cell”, 2008, pp. 357-363, exPRESS Polymer Letters vol. 2, No. 5.
John Pern “Module Encapsulation Materials, Processing and Testing”, 2008, 33 pages, NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Dynamic mechanical analysis—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 7 sheets [retrieved on Oct. 23, 2012], retrieved from the internet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic—mechanical—analysis.
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis Basics: Part 1 How DMA Works, 2007, pp. 1-4, Technical Note Thermal Analysis, Perkin Elmer Inc., Waltham, MA.
SunPower Discovers the “Surface Polarization” Effect in High Efficiency Solar Cells, Aug. 2005, pp. 1-4, Source: SunTechnics SunReader.
R. Swanson, et al., “The Surface Polarization Effect in High-Effiency Silicon Solar Cells”, submitted for publication to the 15th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference & Solar Energy Exhibition, Oct. 10-15, 2005 (4 sheets), Shanghai, China.
Jianhua Zhao, et al., “Performance Instability in N-Type Pert Silicon Solar Cells”, The 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, May 12-16, 2003 (4 sheets), Osaka, Japan.
S.M. Sze “Physics of Semiconductor Devices”, 1981 Second Edition, pp. 362-369, Copyright by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., U.S.
W.P. Mulligan, et al. “A Flat-Plate Concentrator: Micro-Concentrator Design Overview”, 2000, 3 sheets, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE PVSC.
K. R. McIntosh, et al. “The Choice of Silicon Wafer for the Production of Low-Cost Rear-Contact Solar Cells”, May 2003, 4 sheets, Sunpower Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA.
P.J. Verlinden, et al. “Will We have a 20%-Efficient(PTC) Photovoltaic System?”, 2001, 6 sheets, Proceedings of the 17th Europe Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference.
William P. Mulligan, et al. “Development of Chip-Size Silicon Solar Cells”, 2000, 6 sheets, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE PVSC.
Akira Terao, et al. “A Mirror-Less Design for Micro-Concentrator Modules”, 2000, 4 sheets, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE PVSC.
P.J. Verlinden, et al. “Backside-Contact Silicon Solar Cells with Improved Efficiency for the '96 World Solar Challenge”, 1997, 5 sheets, Proceedings of the 15th EPSEC.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/US2013/071402, 7 sheets, Apr. 14, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140144487 A1 May 2014 US