This invention relates to a crane mount assembly for a utility truck, and more specifically, and without limitation, to a mount assembly that provides greater support strength and rigidity for mounting a crane used in a utility truck.
Assemblies for mounting cranes for use with utility vehicles are well known within the art. Generally, these mounting assemblies include a support bracket that is secured to either the loading body of a vehicle or the chassis. As an example, and incorporated by reference herein, U.S. Pat. No. 4,463,858 by Bilas discloses a U-shaped support frame secured to a truck bed and the frame. As a further example, and incorporated by reference herein, U.S. Pat. No. 4,643,320 by Larsen discloses a crane bracket that may be mounted under the loading body and preferably in a space between the cab and the loading body. While these brackets provide for the mounting of a crane thereupon, because of their construction, the size of crane used, as well as the load to be moved by the crane are limited. When either too large of a crane is mounted or too large of a load applied, both bending and torsion forces can cause damage to the crane mount assembly.
Thus, a primary objective of the present invention is to provide a crane mount assembly that provides greater support strength for mounting a crane.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a crane mount assembly that can withstand greater torsion and bending forces.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a crane mount assembly for supporting larger loads.
Another objective of the present invention is to provide a crane mount assembly that allows a simple means of installing the crane.
These and other objectives, features, and advantages will become apparent from the following disclosure.
The crane mount assembly includes a crane mount base and a crane tower. The base includes a pair of longitudinal members in spaced alignment with a plurality of transverse members positioned therebetween. A top plate and bottom plate, otherwise known as the uppermost plate and the lowermost plate, are secured between the longitudinal members and transverse members to form a torsion cell.
The crane tower includes a base plate secured to the top plate of the mount base, a plurality of side panels that extend vertically from the base plate, and a mounting plate secured to the top edge of the side panels.
Referring to the drawings, the present invention is described in reference to a utility truck by example only. It is contemplated that the crane mount assembly can be used in other vehicles and structures. A conventional truck 10 has a floor plate 11 supported by a body subframe 12, otherwise known as the bed subframe that is conventionally secured to truck frame members 14 which run parallel to the longitudinal direction of the truck 10.
The crane mount assembly 16 includes a crane mount base 18 and a crane tower 20. The crane mount base has a pair of longitudinal members 22 in parallel spaced alignment that extend across and beyond the truck frame members 14. Positioned between and secured to the longitudinal members 22 by conventional means are a plurality of transverse members 24. Two of the transverse members 24 are in parallel alignment and secured to the truck frame members 14 to provide greater support for the crane mount assembly 16. The base 18 can be secured to the truck frame in any conventional manner including a weld unit.
In order to comprise the torsion cell the top surface of the top or uppermost plate 26 of the torsion cell must be located within the same horizontal plane as a top surface of the transverse members 24 and a top surface of the longitudinal members 22.
The crane mount base 18 is incorporated into the weld mount of the body such that the top plates 26 are flush with the top of the body subframe 12 and dwell in the same horizontal plane. Both the crane mount base 18 and the body subframe 12 support the floor plate 11 of the truck. By incorporating the base 18 into the subframe body 12, the floor plate 11 may be positioned lower than in conventional models to provide greater loading capacity.
The crane tower 20 is positioned in the rear body compartment of the truck 10 and extends vertically inside the compartment to provide a rigid support for the crane. As shown in
In operation, when the crane 40 is mounted to the crane mount assembly 16, there is an initial bending load on the rearward portion of the crane mount base 18. The attachment of the longitudinal members 22 and transverse members 24 to the truck frame members 14, in combination with the torsion cell created by the top and bottom plates (26, 28) provides greater strength to resist bending forces and allows for a crane 40 with greater loading capacity to be mounted. When the crane 40 receives a load and rotates about its vertical axis, torsion forces are placed on the crane mount assembly 16 particularly when the load is at a 45° angle in relation to the center of the crane tower 20. The torsion cell created by the assembled crane mount base 18 spreads the torsional forces across the crane mount base and provides greater resistance to the torque placed upon the base, thus allowing for greater load capacity. For example, utilizing a torsion base that is approximately five inches in height between the floor plate 11 and the subframe 12 the crane mount assembly can absorb approximately 20,000 ft./lbs of torque before failure is reached. By contrast, a conventional crane assembly would require a seven to eight inch base to absorb the same torque, which reduces the cargo loading space, or would fail at approximately 12,000 ft./lbs of torque if a five inch base were used.
Accordingly, as can be seen from the preceding disclosure, the crane mount assembly meets its objectives by providing greater support strength for supporting larger loads.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2487305 | Bridgegroom | Nov 1949 | A |
2496401 | McKinney | Feb 1950 | A |
2638232 | Perkins | May 1953 | A |
2653829 | Sheehan | Sep 1953 | A |
2846263 | La Rue | Aug 1958 | A |
3023914 | McGuire | Mar 1962 | A |
3111226 | Kirsten | Nov 1963 | A |
3426917 | Siegel | Feb 1969 | A |
3533515 | Milner, Jr. | Oct 1970 | A |
3596976 | Eitel et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3622171 | Gottschalk | Nov 1971 | A |
3792778 | Sholl et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3918742 | Gaibler et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3972571 | Benkowski | Aug 1976 | A |
4049238 | Brown | Sep 1977 | A |
4059170 | Young | Nov 1977 | A |
4069922 | Hawkins | Jan 1978 | A |
4160558 | Fritsch | Jul 1979 | A |
4167278 | Holmes | Sep 1979 | A |
4276985 | Newman | Jul 1981 | A |
4441851 | Starkweather | Apr 1984 | A |
4463858 | Bilas | Aug 1984 | A |
4540095 | Wormser et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4570973 | Ewers et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4643320 | Larsen | Feb 1987 | A |
5281078 | Mills, Jr. | Jan 1994 | A |
5368317 | McCombs et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5393193 | Dagg | Feb 1995 | A |
5678707 | Stallbaumer et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040195196 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |