This application relates to overhead cranes for use in industrial plants, and more particularly to an overhead crane that is configured to lift a load using motorized means, but wherein an operator manually pulls or pushes the lifted load to its destination.
Overhead cranes typically include a pair of runways, which may be mounted fixedly to the roof joists of an industrial plant, a bridge that includes one or more bridge rails which have rollers at their ends for rolling along the runway rails, and a trolley which has rollers thereon for rolling along the one or more bridge rails. A hoist or some other lifting device is provided on the trolley for lifting a load.
For cranes having capacities of more than 4000 pounds, I-beam crane rails are typically used for the one or more bridge rails and for the runways. For cranes having capacities of less 4000 pounds, enclosed track crane rails, such as the crane rail shown at 100 in
A particular category of cranes is referred to as ‘light’ cranes, and typically have a capacity of about 2000 pounds or less. Light cranes typically do not have tractor drives on the bridge and trolley, which means that the load, once lifted off the plant floor, is moved around manually by the crane operator.
For such cranes, the weight of the bridge rails directly impacts the effort that the operator is required to exert when moving the lifted load to its destination. It is thus generally desirable to reduce the weight of the bridge rails. By reducing their weight, the effort required to move a given size of lifted load can be reduced.
A typical enclosed bridge rail is shown in
Another way has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,960,459 issued on Feb. 25, 2015 to Givens.
It would be desirable to find other ways of reducing the weight of the bridge rail while reducing the possibility that the bridge rail may twist when loaded, particularly for light cranes that lack tractor drives for moving the bridge on the runways.
In a first aspect, the invention is directed to an overhead crane, comprising: first and second runway rails that extend parallel to a generally horizontal runway axis; a bridge that extends along a bridge axis that is generally horizontal and perpendicular to the runway axis and that is movable on the runway rails along the runway axis, wherein the bridge includes a bridge rail having first and second ends and rolling structures at the first and second ends which are rollably supported on the first and second runway rails; a trolley having a plurality of trolley wheels thereon permitting movement of the trolley along the bridge rail; and a lifting device for holding a load, wherein the lifting device is supported by the trolley, wherein the bridge further includes a first bridge reinforcement member pre-loaded under tension to provide an upward deflection of the bridge rail, the first bridge reinforcement member comprising at least two upwardly extending struts and a common upper end where the at least two struts meet, the at least two struts having lower ends mechanically connected to the bridge rail at positions longitudinally spaced apart with respect to the bridge axis, the lower ends of the at least two struts longitudinally translatable along the bridge rail to adjust the tension on the first bridge reinforcement member to thereby adjust the extent of upward deflection of the bridge rail, a single pair of second bridge reinforcement members extending between the upper end of the first bridge reinforcement member and mechanically connected to the bridge rail proximate the first and second outer ends, the second bridge reinforcement members loaded in compression, and the bridge reinforcement members providing the greatest increase in bending strength at the longitudinal center of the bridge rail.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a retrofit kit that permits the reinforcing structure described above to be easily retrofitted to existing bridge rails without the need for welding and without the need to install an inordinate quantity of fasteners.
In another aspect, there is provided a bridge or runway for an overhead crane, the bridge or runway comprising: a rail; a first reinforcement member pre-loaded under tension to provide an upward deflection of the rail, the first reinforcement member comprising at least two upwardly extending struts and a common upper end where the at least two struts meet, the at least two struts having lower ends mechanically connected to the rail at positions longitudinally spaced apart with respect to a longitudinal axis of the rail, the lower ends of the at least two struts longitudinally translatable along the rail to adjust the tension on the first reinforcement member to thereby adjust the extent of upward deflection of the rail; and, a single pair of second reinforcement members extending between the upper end of the first reinforcement member and mechanically connected to the rail proximate the first and second outer ends, the second reinforcement members loaded in compression.
Further features will be described or will become apparent in the course of the following detailed description. It should be understood that each feature described herein may be utilized in any combination with any one or more of the other described features, and that each feature does not necessarily rely on the presence of another feature except where evident to one of skill in the art.
For clearer understanding, preferred embodiments will now be described in detail by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference is made to
The bridge 14 shown in
The bridge rail 24 in
The bridge rail 24 may be made from any suitable material, such as aluminum. It will be understood that, throughout this disclosure, the term aluminum is intended to encompass both pure aluminum and aluminum alloys. By manufacturing the bridge rail 24 out of aluminum the bridge rail 24 is lighter than if it were manufactured from a material such as steel.
Referring to
The first bridge reinforcement member 36 may comprise two struts 36a and 36b connected together at a common upper end 50 of the reinforcement member 36. In some embodiments, more than two struts may be used. Lower ends of the struts 36a and 36b may be mounted to the bridge rail 24 at longitudinally spaced apart positions on the bridge rail 24. The struts 36a and 36b form an inverted V-shape between the upper end 50 of the first bridge reinforcement member 36 and the bridge rail 24. The struts 36a and 36b meet and form an angle A at the common upper end 50, as shown by dashed lines in
The first bridge reinforcement member 36 may be mounted to the bridge rail 24 in any suitable way, such as by a mechanical connection. For example, as shown in
Each second bridge reinforcement member 38 has a first end 48 that may be mechanically connected to the upper end (shown at 50) of the first bridge reinforcement member 36. For example, as shown in
Each second bridge reinforcement member 38 has a second end 52 (
The receiving aperture 53 may be a blind aperture with an end wall to support the second end 52 of the second bridge reinforcement member 38. The receiving aperture 53 may be referred to as a bracket receiving aperture 53.
During use with a chain type hoist on the trolley 16, the first member 36 is in tension and the second members 38 are in compression.
Referring to
The reinforcement members 36 and 38 together form a truss that is relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture and that is relatively simple and quick to mount to the bridge rail 24 and is particularly advantageous in embodiments wherein the bridge rail 24 is made from aluminum. While mechanical joints are preferred for connecting the reinforcement members 36 and 38 to each other and to the bridge rail 24, particularly when all of these components are made from aluminum, it is nonetheless contemplated that these components could alternatively be welded together.
In general, welding to an aluminum bridge rail can be difficult to achieve without weakening the parent material that makes up the bridge rail. Use of mechanical fasteners instead to join reinforcement members to a bridge rail can be relatively time consuming however. Some proposed prior art reinforcement structures do not lend themselves to be joined to an aluminum bridge rail, since they entail joining to the bridge rail at many points, which would involve either many welds, which would weaken the bridge rail, or many mechanical fasteners, which would make the bridge rail prohibitively time consuming to manufacture.
The reinforcement structure 35 in
By providing the reinforcement members 36 and 38, the bridge rail 24 can be made lighter than would otherwise be required if it consisted only of the bridge rail 24, for holding a selected size of load. This reduces the overall amount of weight that an operator must push or pull in embodiments wherein bridge drive motors are not provided. This is also advantageous in embodiments that do include drive motors for the bridge since the bridge drive motor (or motors) have less work to do to move the lighter bridge along the runway rails.
Another advantage to this configuration is that the bridge 14 has less momentum associated with it, and so the operator has a greater degree of control over stopping the bridge 14 after rolling the bridge 14 to a selected point along the runway rails 20. This is particularly relevant for bridges 14 that have relatively long spans, which are necessarily heavier and which have larger bending moments associated therewith resulting from the greater distances between their points of support on the runway rails and the load.
In another advantage, the first bridge reinforcement member 36 provides for less deflection of the bridge rail 24 under load, especially near the center of the bridge rail 24 compared to prior art crane rails. The first reinforcement member may be pre-tensioned thereby pre-loading the crane rail upward before any load is applied to the crane rail. Pre-loading the crane rail results in an upward deflection of the crane rail before any load is applied. As a load is applied, the crane rail will first flatten out and then deflect downward. When a load is applied to the crane rail, the maximum load of the crane rail is not reached by attaining a maximum stress, but rather by coming to a maximum allowable deflection of the crane rail. Beyond maximum deflection, the load will tend to roll downhill and there will be a perceptible effort in order to pull the load uphill. In the present invention, the first bridge reinforcement member 36 spreads out support over more of the midsection of the bridge rail 24, which provides for less deflection of the bridge rail 24 under load, especially near the center of the rail, which permits applying larger loads compared to prior art crane rails before the maximum allowable deflection is reached.
In another advantage, adjustment of the first bridge reinforcement member 36 rather than adjustment of the two second bridge reinforcement members 38 may be utilized to adjust the amount of pre-loading and therefore the extent of upward deflection of the bridge rail 24. In prior art crane rails, adjusting the amount of pre-loading required adjusting the positions of the brackets that secured far ends of the second bridge reinforcement members to the crane rail. In the prior art, adjusting the brackets requires two operators, one at each end of the crane rail, each operator independently moving respective brackets in a relatively uncoordinated manner. As a result, the brackets are prone to being moved by differing distances, which would result in movement and off-centering of the upper end of the first bridge reinforcement member, compromising the ability of the crane to handle loads and providing uneven stresses on the reinforcement members during use of the crane.
In the present structure, the mechanical fasteners 46, the pins 45 and the pins 41 may be loosened without removal to permit the support flanges 42 together with the clamping plates 47 to translate longitudinally within the slot 51, and to permit the struts 36a and 36b to pivot around the pins 41 and 45. With the mechanical fasteners 46 and the pins 41 and 45 loosened but in place, the lower ends 44 of the struts 36a and 36b may be separated farther apart or brought closer together, followed by retightening of the mechanical fasteners 46 and the pins 41 and 45. As seen in
In yet another advantage, transverse horizontal deflection on opposite sides of the first bridge reinforcement member 36 when the bridge rail 24 is placed under load is unexpectedly reduced in comparison to prior art crane rails. In prior art crane rails, loading the bridge rail produces twisting at the joint between the second bridge reinforcement members, and twisting of the first reinforcement member. The limit of the capacity of such crane rails is reached when the second bridge reinforcement members begin to buckle. Typically, one second reinforcement member will buckle out in one direction and the other will buckle out in the opposite direction. Viewed from above, the second reinforcement members begin to form an S-shape, with the first reinforcement member significantly twisted. In the present invention, such buckling and twisting is minimized or prevented, allowing higher loads to be supported before the onset of buckling, allowing a reduction in size (and weight) of the second reinforcement members, and allowing for longer crane spans to be used.
The angle A (see
Referring to
The trolley 16 may be made substantially from aluminum. Other materials may also be used in addition to or instead of aluminum.
The lifting device 18 may be a hoist or may be some other suitable type of lifting device.
Referring to
The first runway reinforcement member 78 comprises two struts 78a and 78b connected together at a common upper end of the runway reinforcement member 78. Lower ends of the struts 78a and 78b may be mounted to the runway rail 20 at longitudinally spaced apart positions on the runway rail 20. The struts 78a and 78b form an inverted V-shape between the upper end of the first runway reinforcement member 78 and the runway rail 20. The first runway reinforcement member 78 may be designed in a similar manner as the first bridge reinforcement member 36.
By strengthening the bending resistance of the runway rail 20 in this way, the runway rail 20 itself may be made smaller than it would need to be if the reinforcement structure 72 were omitted. As a result, the overall weight and cost of the runway rail 20 may be reduced relative to a runway rail that did not have a reinforcement structure thereon. It will be noted, however, that reducing the weight of the runway rail, while advantageous, does not facilitate the movement of a lifted load to a destination point, since the runway rails 20 remain fixed in place throughout any operation with the overhead crane. The runway rails 20 may be made from any suitable material, such as steel, or aluminum.
Reference is made to
It will be noted that, for the bridge rail 202a, the first reinforcement member 210 is under compression and the two second reinforcement members 212 are under tension. Conversely, the first reinforcement member 210 on the second bridge rail 202b is under tension and the second reinforcement members 212 on the second bridge rail 202b are under compression, in similar manner to the single rail bridge 14 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
The upper block 234 may be connected to the main bodies shown at 236a and 236b of struts 210a and 210b, respectively, of the first reinforcement member 210 by retaining pins 215, for example threaded fasteners such as bolt and nut fasteners. The struts 210a and 210b may be mounted on respective support flanges 222 with pins 217, for example threaded fasteners such as bolt and nut fasteners, that pass through lower ends of the struts 210a and 210b and through respective mounting blocks 219 fixedly attached to the support flanges 222. In a similar manner as described previously, the threaded fasteners 220, retaining pins 215 and pins 217 may be loosened to permit movement of the lower ends of the struts 210a and 210b along the bridge rail 202.
Referring to
Referring to
As can be seen in
Referring to
Referring to
It will be noted that the reinforcement structures 35 and 208 can easily be retrofitted to existing bridge rails 24, 202 in an existing overhead crane 10, 200, particularly where the overhead crane has upper flanges that can be used as reinforcement support flanges. As a result, the bridge rails can be strengthened significantly so as to be capable of supporting increased loads. It will further be noted that the reinforcement can be provided by the structure 35, 208 without the need for welding elements to the rails 24, 202, without drilling through the rails 24, 202 and without requiring an inordinate number of fasteners.
It is optionally possible to provide the retaining pins 215 and 242 on a single rail bridge, such as the bridge 14, for use in situations where the single rail bridge 14 will be subjected to upward forces from the lifting member.
The novel features will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon examination of the description. It should be understood, however, that the scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the wording of the claims and the specification as a whole.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
779493 | MoMyler | Jan 1905 | A |
945751 | Butler | Jan 1910 | A |
1204470 | Miller | Nov 1916 | A |
1296755 | Buckley | Mar 1919 | A |
1515023 | Fitch | Nov 1924 | A |
3062340 | Hunnebeck | Nov 1962 | A |
4202529 | Fitting | May 1980 | A |
4569453 | Oustad | Feb 1986 | A |
5022542 | Beier | Jun 1991 | A |
5230197 | Hart | Jul 1993 | A |
5337908 | Beck, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5385249 | Long, Jr. | Jan 1995 | A |
5443151 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5526614 | Huang | Jun 1996 | A |
5694857 | Taylor | Dec 1997 | A |
5921415 | Markelz | Jul 1999 | A |
6378387 | Froom | Apr 2002 | B1 |
8960459 | Givens | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20020084238 | Zingerman | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20110180507 | Givens | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110247993 | Chernyak | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180229980 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |