The present invention generally relates to the field of railcars. More specifically, the invention relates to a structure designed for a cab end of a railcar that is capable of absorbing the energy in case of a crash especially between a passenger car and a locomotive.
In order to promote greater safety of conventional intercity and commuter railroads which operate on the general railroad system with other trains including freight trains, the federal government has promulgated regulations governing passenger rail safety. Nevertheless, train operators unions have pushed for higher safety passenger railcar designs since they felt that the train operators where exposed in case of a collision with a freight locomotive. Indeed, in many commuter railcar designs, the train operator cab is placed right at the front of the railcar, being protected only by vertical beams, called corner posts, and collision posts.
Alternate designs of a cab end of passenger railcars have been proposed. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,565 to Bravo discloses a passenger railcar using a crash energy management module at the cab end of the vehicle, in front of the corner posts and collision posts. This provides additional energy absorption and further protects the train operator. However, there are a few drawbacks with this design. For one, the disclosed crash energy management module uses energy absorbers that may be exposed to high lateral loads in case of a crash with some locomotives like the ones known as the F40, MP40 and F59. These locomotives all have a pointed front end that can intrude between the energy absorbers disclosed by Bravo and pushes them sideways, making them less efficient in absorbing energy.
Moreover, conventional cab end design uses two vertical collision posts, extending from a floor of the railcar to its roof, that are located between the vertical corner posts. The train operator is typically seated on one side or another, between one corner post and one collision post. Although providing adequate protection for the train operator, this design restricts his field of view.
There is therefore a need for a better design of a crash structure for the cab end of a railcar.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a crash structure for the cab end of a railcar that overcomes or mitigates one or more disadvantages of known crash structures, or at least provides a useful alternative.
The invention provides the advantages of providing a crash structure for the cab end of a railcar allowing better visibility to the train operator. Moreover, the present invention provides a crash structure adapted to cope with a crash with some types of locomotives.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a railcar having a chassis, a front end frame, a control cab for a train operator and an energy absorbing crash structure. The chassis has a cab end and a rear end. The front end frame is connected to the cab end of the chassis. The front end frame includes a pair of corner posts and a collision post structure. Each one of the pair of corner posts is located at a different corner of the chassis at the cab end. The collision post structure is located between the pair of corner posts. The control cab has a control cab floor and is located proximate the cab end. A crash energy management module, located ahead of the front end frame, has a plurality of energy absorbers and a crash shield. The plurality of energy absorbers is attached to the front end frame. There is a left energy absorber located on a left portion of the chassis and a right energy absorber located on a right portion of the chassis. The crash shield is attached substantially vertically to the plurality of energy absorbers. The crash shield and the plurality of energy absorbers are operative to transfer vertical and lateral loads to the chassis.
Optionally, the crash shield may include a grabbing aperture laterally located in a median region of the crash shield. This grabbing aperture extends vertically from at most 56.5 inches above top of rail to at least 67 inches above top of rail.
Preferably, the control cab is located behind the crash energy management module. The plurality of energy absorbers has four energy absorbers: two of the four energy absorbers are located on a right portion of the railcar while the other two energy absorbers are located on a left portion of the railcar. Two of the four energy absorbers may substantially be aligned with the chassis while the other two energy absorbers may substantially be aligned with the control cab floor which may be located higher than the chassis on which a lower passenger floor is installed. Advantageously, the four energy absorbers are also vertically centered about a level of a floor deck of a locomotive. Optionally, the four energy absorbers may be attached to the collision post structure and may form a square pattern.
Optionally, the railcar further includes an upper passenger floor and the control cab floor is located at a height intermediate that of the lower passenger floor and that of the upper passenger floor.
Optionally, the railcar may further include a protection shell that extends laterally between the pair of corner posts and vertically from the control cab floor. This protection shell is operative to prevent longitudinal intrusion within the control cab.
Preferably, the control cab is located above the crash energy management module and extends laterally between the pair of corner posts.
Optionally, the collision post structure has two lower collision posts, a structural beam, also known as a structural shelf, and an upper collision post. The two lower collision posts extend vertically from the chassis to an intermediate height of the railcar. The structural shelf, which extends transversally and continuously at least between the pair of corner posts, connects top portions of the two lower collision posts. The upper collision post extends from the structural shelf to a top portion of the railcar. The upper collision post is aligned with a median vertical plane of the railcar. Advantageously, the structural shelf may at least partially overlap each one of the pair of corner posts.
Optionally, the two lower collision posts have at least an upper portion that is canted forward, thereby providing additional space in the control cab.
Optionally, the pair of corner posts extend substantially vertically and continuously from the chassis up to an upper portion of the railcar, or up to an anti-telescoping plate.
The railcar may include an exterior sloped shell. The crash energy management module is located within the exterior sloped shell.
Preferably, the railcar is a passenger railcar.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a railcar having a chassis, a front end frame, a control cab for a train operator and a crash energy management module. The front end frame is connected to a cab end of the chassis. The front end frame includes a pair of corner posts and a collision post structure. Each one of the pair of corner posts is located at a different corner of the front end frame. The collision post structure is located between the pair of corner posts. The collision post structure has two lower collision posts, a structural shelf and an upper collision post. The lower collision posts extend substantially vertically from the chassis to an intermediate height of the railcar. The structural shelf connects top portions of the two lower collision posts and extends transversally between the pair of corner posts. The upper collision post extends from the structural shelf to a top portion of the railcar and is aligned with a longitudinal median vertical plane of the railcar. The control cab is located proximate the front end. The crash energy management module is located ahead of the front end frame.
Optionally, the control cab and its floor extend laterally between the pair of corner posts, or in other words from one corner post to the other corner post.
The two lower collision posts may have at least an upper portion that is canted forward, thereby providing additional space in the control cab. The structural shelf may at least longitudinally partially overlap each one of the pair of corner posts.
Optionally, the railcar further includes a protection shell extending laterally between the pair of corner posts and vertically from the control cab floor. The protection shell is operative to prevent longitudinal intrusion within the control cab.
Preferably, the control cab is located behind and above the crash energy management module and above the lower passenger floor.
Optionally, the crash energy management module has a plurality of energy absorbers and a crash shield. The plurality of energy absorbers are attached to the collision post structure. The plurality of energy absorbers has a left energy absorber located on a left portion of the railcar and a right energy absorber located on a right portion of the railcar. The crash shield is attached substantially vertically to the plurality of energy absorbers.
The crash shield may further include a grabbing aperture that is laterally located in a median region of the crash shield. Typically, the grabbing aperture extends vertically from at most 56.5 inches above top of rail to at least 67 inches above top of rail.
The railcar may further have an upper passenger floor. The control cab floor may be located at a height intermediate that of the lower passenger floor and that of the upper passenger floor. Alternately, the control cab floor may also be located at the same level as the upper passenger floor.
Optionally, the plurality of energy absorbers includes four energy absorbers. Two of the four energy absorbers are located on a right portion of the railcar and the other two of energy absorbers are located on a left portion of the railcar. Two of the four energy absorbers are substantially aligned with the chassis while the two other energy absorbers are substantially aligned with the control cab floor.
Optionally, the pair of corner posts extend substantially vertically and continuously from the chassis up to an upper portion of the railcar, or up to an anti-telescoping plate.
The railcar may also include an exterior sloped shell. The crash energy management module is located within the exterior slated shell.
Preferably, the railcar is a passenger railcar.
These and other features of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings wherein:
The present invention relates to a front end structure of a railcar, and especially to a crash structure adapted to cope with a crash with some type of a locomotive. The crash structure also provides an improved visibility for the train operator seated in the cab.
The front end frame 22 has a pair of corner posts 24, a collision post structure 26 and an upper horizontal beam known as an anti-telescoping plate 27 located at an upper portion of the railcar 10. Each corner post 24 is positioned at a different corner of the chassis 16 at the cab end 12. The corner posts 24 extend substantially vertically and continuously from the lower passenger floor 23, or chassis front portion 17, up to the anti-telescoping plate 27. The corner posts 24 are typically made of steel beams. The collision post structure 26 is located between the pair of corner posts 24.
The crash shield 44 is attached substantially vertically and laterally to the four energy absorbers 42. The crash shield 44 has three functions: 1) it distributes an eventual crash load over the energy absorbers 42, thereby making them work as one unit; 2) it links together the four energy absorbers 42, and especially the right ones to the left ones, so that they remain laterally and vertically stable and collapse mostly longitudinally in case of a crash. This is important because some locomotives have a pointed front end that, absent the crash shield 44, would penetrate between the energy absorbers 42 and push them outwardly, the energy absorbers then rotating on their attachment base 50 at the collision post structure 26; and 3) using its central grabbing aperture 52, the crash shield 44 is capable of grabbing the pointed front end of a locomotive crashing into it and prevent the locomotive from climbing over the railcar 10, therefore acting as an anti-climbing device.
As described, the crash shield 44 is designed to work with certain types of locomotives, including, but not limited to, F40, MP40 and F59 locomotives, which all have in common that their floor has a pointed end at their front end. The crash shield 44 is also designed to distribute vertical and lateral loads to the energy absorbers 42 and to transfer this load through the energy absorbers 42 to the front end frame 22. To be effective, the grabbing aperture 52 is centered on the longitudinal vertical center plane of the railcar 10 and centered at a vertical position corresponding approximately to that of a locomotive floor deck. The grabbing aperture 52, substantially rectangular in shape, may extend vertically from 50 inches above top of rail (TOR) to 75 inches above TOR. Preferably, the grabbing aperture 52 extends from 56.5 inches above TOR to 67 inches above TOR.
In order to better protect the train operator 38, the control cab 18 is located behind the crash energy management module 40 and behind the front end frame 22. The control cab 18 has a control cab floor 48 that may extend the whole width of the railcar 10 (best shown in
As seen in
Advantageously, the crash energy management module 40 is modular in nature and may be replaced by a rigid module in situations where no crash energy management features are required.
The present invention has been described with regard to preferred embodiments. The description as much as the drawings were intended to help the understanding of the invention, rather than to limit its scope. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the scope of the invention as described herein, and such modifications are intended to be covered by the present description. The invention is defined by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2662488 | Clary | Dec 1953 | A |
2811932 | Clary | Nov 1957 | A |
3868908 | Pelabon | Mar 1975 | A |
4184434 | Chapin | Jan 1980 | A |
D315536 | Rader | Mar 1991 | S |
5063859 | Rader | Nov 1991 | A |
5458066 | Ishida et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5579699 | Dannawi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6158356 | Hachet et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6561105 | Godin et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6712007 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6799794 | Mochidome et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6886474 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7536958 | Bravo et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7900565 | Bravo et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20040159263 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20070186802 | Gough | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070261591 | Bravo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20110096300 | Aug 2011 | KR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140360402 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |