The invention pertains to gas detection systems and particularly to toxic gas detection systems. More particularly, the invention pertains to cavity ring-down spectroscopy systems.
The invention is a dual Brewster window cavity ring-down spectroscopy detector or analyzer having protected optics for detecting and analyzing toxic gases.
a and 1b are diagrams of an illustrative cavity ring-down spectroscopy system incorporating Brewster windows;
It may be desirable to use a cavity ring down spectroscopy (CRDS) measurements on gases that are hazardous to the high quality optical mirrors. It is also desirable to know a precise path length of the absorption in the gas for doing a more quantitative analysis of cross section.
The present invention may separate the CRDS system into regions, some of which are sealed and either in vacuum or at positive pressure with a non-absorbing gas such as argon. Another portion of the invention may consist of a Brewster cell that can be placed in the light path and have surfaces angled at a Brewster's angle so that there is no reflectance from the surfaces. The material used for the Brewster cell should have no absorption or very low absorption either by being very thin or of a suitable material or a combination of both.
a and 1b show an illustrative example 11 of an implementation of the present invention. Item 12 is a structure that may support components of the cavity ring-down spectroscopy device. The structure 12 may have two or more corners with a mirror located at each corner. The mirrors in structure 12 are shown in dashed lines so that other components of the example 11 may be seen. Mirrors 13, 14 and 15 may be attached to structure 12. Light 16 from a source 38 may enter structure 12 through a partially reflective mirror 13. Light 16 may proceed onto mirror 14 to be reflected to mirror 15. Mirror 15 may reflect light to mirror 13. Mirror 13 may reflect light 16 onto mirror 14 which reflects light 16 to mirror 15, and so on, until through losses, light 16 eventually dissipates. In the meanwhile, the magnitude of light 16 may be monitored at mirror 13 since a small amount of light 16 may exit structure 12 through mirror 13 and be sensed by a detector 39. This exit of light 16 may be light leakage or an intentionally designed (i.e., partially reflective) port for output of some light 16.
At each corner of the path for light 16 may be two Brewster windows 17 and 18. One window 17 may receive light to a respective mirror, for instance mirror 13, and the other window 18 may be for light exiting from the mirror. The space or volume between the mirror and the Brewster windows 17 and 18 may be hermetically sealed from the external or ambient environment 19. This space may be a vacuum or filled with an inert gas such as argon, or some gas that would not have absorption at the wave length of light 16. So if structure 12 is in a toxic gas environment 19, mirrors 13, 14 and 15 are protected. Examples of toxic gas include, but are not limited to, NH3, HF, HCl and H2S The Brewster windows 17 and 18, which are positioned over mirrors 14 and 15, as over mirror 13, may be made from a material that is not affected by the toxic gas. Examples of window 17, 18 material include, but are not limited to, SiO2, Si3N4, ZrO2, Al2O3 and HfO2. On the other hand, Brewster windows 17 and 18 may at least be coated with a material impervious to or not affected by the toxic gas. The material of the Brewster windows should not be absorptive at the wavelength of light 16. The backside of mirrors 13, 14 and 15 likewise would not be affected by the toxic gas. On the other hand, the backside of these mirrors may be coated with a protective material or structure.
The mirrors 13, 14 and 15 might not be connected or situated in structure 12, as shown in
There may be just two structures, e.g., 23 and 24, or more than three structures in CRDS system 11, along with their respective Brewster windows 17 and 18.
The Brewster windows 17 and 18 may receive light 16. One portion of light 16 may have a P polarization (e.g., vertical), and reject or reflect the portion of light 16 which has an S (i.e., horizontal) polarization. The Brewster angle for windows 17 and 18 may be determined with the following formula, θB=arctan(n2/n1), where θB is the Brewster angle, n1 and n2 are the refractive indices of the two media, respectively, e.g., environment 19 and the material of windows 17 and 18.
Structures 23, 24 and 25 might be or might not be part of or integrated as a part of the overall structure 12.
The environment 19 with the toxic or other gas may be limited to the inside of structure 12 by sealing a cavity volume 21, with plates (not shown) or other effective containment mechanism on the bottom and top of structure 12, from the environment external to volume 21, or volume 21 may be open (without plates or the like) and exposed to environment 19 external to volume 21.
Brewster windows 17 and 18 may be attached to structure 23, 24 or 25, respectively, with clamps 28 and fasteners 29 (e.g., screws). Mirror 13, 14 or 15, respectively, may be attached to its structure with a bonding material or clamping mechanism (not shown). A volume 31 inside of structure 23, 24 or 25, may be hermetically sealed from environment 19 and volume 21. Volume 31 may be a vacuum or filled with a gas (e.g., argon) that would not interfere with the proper operation of device or system 11.
Window 17, 18 in
Situated on film window 32 of Brewster window 17, 18 may be one or more loops of a heating element 35 proximate to hole 36 of substrate 44. Electric power may be applied to element 35 via contact pads 37. Element 35 may be embedded or impregnated in window 32, or be on one side or the other side of window 32. Heater 35 may be used to evaporate contaminants of Brewster window 17, 18, eliminate condensation, and provide other benefits such as temperature stabilization. Heater 35 may be implemented in other designs or configurations of Brewster window 17, 18, for instance, a solid piece of glass, or other light transmissive and toxic gas resistive material. Heater 35 may be connected to control circuit 41 via heater pads 37, connections, and wiring 43 (
The information from testing noted herein suggests that, at 633 nm with a Brewster window having two good surfaces, losses of the window may be down at ppm levels. This low amount of loss is very good.
Test data was taken with setup 71. A reading of the rotational stage 66 was made with the rotation set to allow the laser beam 53 to reflect back on itself from test Brewster window 72. The dial read 89.75 degrees even though a 90.00 degree reading was anticipated after an alignment performed with mirror 63 in setup 61 of
The Brewster window 72 that was used for the test had only one super-polished surface. Its backside had a normal polish which could account for the 80 ppm overall increase in loss. There appeared to be an angle shift of approximately 0.15 degrees. This may be due to initially setting laser beam 53 back on itself. The calibration was done visually and somewhat challenging to judge since the separation of mirrors 56 and 57 was close. The Brewster test information suggests that at 633 nm for a window having two good surfaces, losses for Brewster window 72 can be down at ppm levels.
In the present specification, some of the matter may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature although stated in another manner or tense.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative example, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/133,076, filed Jun. 25, 2008. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/133,076, filed Jun. 25, 2008, is hereby incorporated by reference. Related applications include: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/233,396, filed Sep. 18, 2008, and entitled “A Cavity Ring Down System having a Common Input/Output Port”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/633,872, filed Dec. 4, 2006, and entitled “Laser Sensor Having a Block Ring Activity”; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,648, filed Jun. 28, 2007, and entitled “Optical Cavity System Having an Orthogonal Input”; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/953,174, filed Sep. 28, 2004, and entitled “Tunable Laser Fluid Sensor”, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,145,165. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/233,396, filed Sep. 18, 2008, and entitled “A Cavity Ring Down System having a Common Input/Output Port”, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/633,872, filed Dec. 4, 2006, and entitled “Laser Sensor Having a Block Ring Activity”, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/770,648, filed Jun. 28, 2007, and entitled “Optical Cavity System Having an Orthogonal Input”, is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/953,174, filed Sep. 28, 2004, and entitled “Tunable Laser Fluid Sensor”, now U.S Pat. No. 7,145,165, is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61133076 | Jun 2008 | US |