Self-service terminals, such as automated teller machines (ATMs) used in the banking industry or self-service kiosks used in the airline and fast-food industries, are becoming increasingly common in all areas of commerce all over the world. Each of these terminals includes physical hardware that allows human users to interact with the terminals in conducting transactions with the business entities that own or operate the terminals. The physical hardware associated with a self-service terminal (or “SST”) typically includes a computer system that is driven by one or more computer-readable programs, or applications, that together govern the SST's behavior as it interacts with the human user.
SSTs typically reside in large networks, in which many SSTs are managed by a single business entity or by multiple entities acting in concert. For ease of management and consistency of operation of the SSTs in a network, the business entity managing the network typically installs a common set of applications among all (or some subset) of the SSTs in the network. Each of these applications includes one or more “executable” files containing computer-executable code that defines the flow of the application as it drives operation of the SST. Executable files are well-known in the computer industry and are not described in any detail here. In the PC industry, these files are typically named with a “.exe” or “.dll” extension so that the computer will recognize them as executable files.
To install applications on the SSTs in the network, the business entity must deliver the executable files that make up the applications to the SSTs, typically by sending the executable files over the network or by having human administrators carry the executable files to the SSTs on portable storage media, such as CD-ROMs. Once the applications are installed to the SSTs, the SSTs can run the applications by invoking the corresponding executable files.
A lingering frustration and source of unwanted cost for any business entity that owns and manages SSTs occurs when the business entity wishes to change an application that it has installed to its SSTs. To do so, the business entity must typically alter the executable files associated with the application at a central location and then distribute and install those files to the SSTs across the network. Reinstallation of executable files typically requires restart of each SST, thus forcing the business entity take the SST “off line” for some period of time. Reinstallation of files also requires the business entity to expend the management costs necessary to oversee the installation and to ensure proper shut down and restart of the SST.
Described below are techniques for use in configuring a self-service terminal (SST) for operation under control of an application in a manner that allows updates to the application at the SST without redistribution of executable files and without a shutdown or restart of the SST. One such technique involves storing computer-executable objects that, when executed, serve as components of the self-service application; and storing one or more structural files that together define relationships among the computer-executable objects such that, when the computer-executable objects are executed, the relationships defined by the structural files govern operational flow of the self-service application. The technique also involves storing one or more computer-executable files that, when executed, cause the self-service terminal to instantiate the computer-executable objects that serve as components of the self-service application, and configure the objects for operation according to the relationships defined in the one or more structural files.
Another technique involves creating a copy of the self-service application by (1) executing one or more computer-executable files that cause the self-service terminal to instantiate within the self-service terminal copies of one or more computer-executable objects that, when executed, serve as components of the self-service application; and (2) accessing one or more structural files that together define relationships among the computer-executable objects such that, when the computer-executable objects are executed, the relationships defined by the structural files govern operational flow of the self-service application. At some point thereafter, the technique also involves executing the self-service application to cause the self-service terminal to engage in a self-service transaction with a human user of the self-service terminal.
For example, a self-service application for use in an automated teller machine (ATM) usually includes an object for conducting a cash-withdrawal transaction at the ATM. A “cash-withdrawal” object typically has many properties, including a “denomination” property identifying the currency denominations available for withdrawal from the ATM and a “timeout” property specifying a time limit for completion of the transaction. The properties of the cash-withdrawal transaction also include a “PIN information” property and an “authorization” property. The “PIN information” property calls a “PIN” object that itself has a set of associated properties, which together lead the ATM through a sequence of steps to capture PIN (personal identification number) information from the ATM customer's bank card and to match that information to the PIN code entered by the customer into the ATM's encrypted PIN pad (EPP). The “authorization” property likewise calls an “authorization” object that guides the ATM as it interacts with a transaction host to authorize the cash-withdrawal requested by the ATM customer.
When the self-service application 100 has been fully developed and tested at the application-development station 115, the business entity that manages the SSTs 105, 110 delivers the executable files that make up the application to the SSTs 105, 100. To do so, the business entity distributes the executable files through a network 130 or through a physical storage medium, such as a CD-ROM, carried to the SSTs by a human administrator. The executable files are typically stored locally at the SSTs 105, 110 to create copies 100A, 100B of the self-service application 100 at the SSTs. In some networks, however, the executable files are stored on one or more server systems that service multiple connected SSTs. Either way, the SSTs 105, 110 invoke the copies 100A, 100B of the self-service application as necessary to interact with human users who engage the SSTs for the purpose of conducting business transactions with the business entity that owns or operates the SSTs.
As described above, any changes to be made to the self-service application 100, including changes to any of the program objects 12014 contained within the application, require modification of the executable files that make up the application on the application-development station 115. The modified executable files must then be distributed to the SSTs 105, 110 to create updated versions of the copies 100A, 100B of the self-service application 100 stored at the SSTs.
The program objects 2301-N contained in the object library are standard computer-executable program objects like those described in connection with the traditional system described above and are not described in any detail here. Likewise, the object factory 280 is similar to code-development programs found in traditional application-development environments and is not described in great detail here. The object factory 280 is unique in that it is configured to parse through the configuration file 250 to extract configuration information identifying the program objects 2401-4 that make up the self-service application 210 and their relationships and configuration parameters in the self-service application. As described in more detail below, the SST 200 invokes the object factory 280 to build the self-service application 210, which the SST 200 then stores and invokes as needed to govern interaction with human users of the SST 200.
The configuration file 250, on the other hand, is not a file containing computer-executable program code, but rather is a computer-readable “document” that identifies (1) the program objects that are to make up the application, (2) the properties of each object and relationships that exist among the objects (e.g., calls from one object to another object), and (3) the configuration parameters of the object (e.g., the set of circumstances under which a particular action will be taken or a related object will be called). The configuration file 250 is, in essence, a “structural” file—i.e., a file that defines the structure of the application by specifying the components of the application and the relationships among those components. As a result, the configuration file 250 is particularly suited for implementation as a markup-language document, such as document following the Extensible Markup Language (XML) specification put forth by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
In general, the configuration file 250 will conform to a specified schema (as defined by the business entity that owns or manages the network of SSTs) to ensure that the object factory 280 is able to read and correctly interpret the information contained in the configuration file. Apart from its adherence to the schema, however, the actual content of the configuration file 250 is of no concern to the object factory 280. As described below, the object factory 280 must simply be able to read and interpret the information in the configuration file 250 and use the information to build the self-service application 210.
In some systems, the configuration file 250 consists of or references multiple configuration components, which themselves are structural documents following the schema specified for the configuration file 250. In the example of
By referencing multiple configuration components in the configuration file 250 in this manner, the owner or manager of the network of SSTs is able to tailor the self-service application to the specific SST on which it resides, while still maintaining a common configuration file that allows simple distribution en masse to all SSTs in the network. For any changes made to the self-service application that will affect all of the SSTs in the network, the business entity managing the SSTs can distribute a revised network configuration component 260 across the network and thus update (or rebuild) the self-service application in each of the SSTs without affecting the SST specific portions of the application. Likewise, for any change made to the application that will affect only one SST, the business entity can deliver a revised SST configuration component 270 directly to that SST and leave the network-wide portions of the application untouched. As described below, the object factory 280, when building the self-service application 210, first accesses the network configuration component 260 and builds the network-wide portion of the application and then accesses the SST configuration component 270 to tailor the application to the specific SST 200.
The system 600 includes a variety of files 6351-4 stored in the persistent storage media 615. These files include the object factory application 6351, the object library 6352, the configuration file 6353, and the self-service application 6354, all described above. Some of these files, such as the object factory application 6351, include executable program code that is read from the persistent storage media 615 and copied into memory 610 at run-time. The processor 605 executes this executable program code by retrieving program instructions from memory in a prescribed order. Other files, such as the configuration file 6353, do not include executable program code, but rather take the form of documents that store information (or data) in a prescribed format.
The text above describes one or more specific embodiments of a broader invention. The invention also is carried out in a variety of alternative embodiments and thus is not limited to those described here. Many other embodiments are also within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60877883 | Dec 2006 | US |