An embodiment of the invention relates to electronic audio signal processing and in particular to techniques for obtaining sub-sample delays between two or more digital audio channels. Other embodiments are also described.
Some audio digital signal processing (DSP) algorithms require audio signals to be delayed by less than an audio sample period. This is known as sub-sample delay. In a multichannel audio system, these algorithms may require different sub-sample delays on a per channel basis. Typically, this is accomplished within the DSP calculations, by passing the signals through special finite impulse response (FIR) filters. The resulting multi-channel output data (showing different sub-sample delays between its channels) is then sent to a set of digital-to-analog converters (DACs) that all run in a synchronized fashion, driven by identical master clocks and sample clocks. The resulting analog signals are then fed to drive a loudspeaker system. This approach has the disadvantage that the FIR filter introduces unwanted side effects into the signal, namely, ripple. A large (many taps) FIR filter will reduce the side effects but will require significant DSP resources, and so this forces trade-offs to be made between audio signal quality and DSP resources.
Several ways that per-channel sub-sample delays could be accomplished that need not rely on FIR fitters are described. These techniques may not just save DSP resources but also could avoid FIR filtering side effects in audio systems.
In one embodiment, several digital to analog converter (DAC) integrated circuits (ICs) are operated in parallel, receiving multiple digital audio channel signals, respectively. The DAC ICs have programmable phase offsets. The sample clock fed to each DAC can be offset in time, by some fraction of a sample period, using a variable clock circuit that is supplying the sample clocks to the DACs. This offset or fraction (also referred to as “delay”) is programmable, and can be set as required by the audio processing algorithm that is being implemented. Each DAC may be a single-channel converter, and two or more of such single-channel converters are needed in order to allow every channel to have to have an independent sub-sample delay setting.
In another embodiment, per-channel sub-sample delays are achieved using single-channel oversampling DACs. A per-channel, programmable digital delay element is added to the oversampling DAC. The DAC operates at an oversampling rate. The granularity of the sub-sample delay in this case may be no finer than the oversampling rate.
The above summary does not include an exhaustive list of all aspects of the present invention. It is contemplated that the invention includes all systems and methods that can be practiced from all suitable combinations of the various aspects summarized above, as well as those disclosed in the Detailed Description below and particularly pointed out in the claims filed with the application. Such combinations have particular advantages not specifically recited in the above summary.
The embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that references to “an” or “one” embodiment of the invention in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and they mean at least one.
Several embodiments of the invention with reference to the appended drawings are now explained. While numerous details are set forth, it is understood that some embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures, and techniques have not been shown in detail so as not to obscure the understanding of this description.
Each sampling clock signal may be used by its respective DAC 4, to sequentially latch the symbols in its respective input stream, e.g., on the rising of each clock cycle. In one embodiment, both channel A and channel B streams have the same sample rate, e.g. between 30 kHz and 300 kHz, where a currently popular sample rate in consumer electronics is 48 kHz. The sampling clocks clk_a and clk_b have essentially the same fundamental frequency as the sample rate or the rate at which the symbols are driven into each DAC 4. Accordingly, the sampling clocks should be generated to be in sync with the symbol streams that are being produced by a digital audio processor 2.
A variable delay clock generator 3 may be provided, to produce the sampling clocks clk_a, clk_b. In particular, the clock generator 3 (as well as the audio processor 2) may use a high frequency oscillatory reference, to produce the sampling clocks and control the timing of the symbol streams that are input to the DACs 4. The generator 3 can generate the clocks clk_a, clk_b so as to have the same frequency but different phase, and is able to vary the phase difference between the clocks in accordance with a sub-sample delay setting received at its control input. The delay setting may be computed and provided by the digital audio processor 2, as a digital control word. The variable delay clock generator 3 may be implemented using combinational logic and flip-flops.
Each instance of the sub-sample delay setting may be computed by the digital audio processor 2, while performing a digital audio processing algorithm upon the digital audio channels A, B. In one embodiment, the digital audio processing algorithm is a beam forming or spatial filtering algorithm that computes the sub-sample delay setting so as to obtain a desired directional or spatially selected emission of sound from speakers 8_a, 8_b, while the latter are being driven by their respective power amplifiers 6_a, 6_b whose inputs receive the analog forms of the audio channels A, B, respectively. As part of the audio processing algorithm, the digital audio processor 2 may also set an overall or full band gain of each channel A, B independently, in order to further the goals of the spatial filtering.
Turning now to
The oversampling DAC 14 converts its input digital audio channel, which may be in the form of a PCM symbol stream produced by the digital audio processor 2, into analog form, by way of converting the input digital audio channel into a PDM stream that is at a much higher frequency than the incoming symbol stream's sampling rate. The DAC 14 is an oversampling DAC in the sense that, for example, if the PCM symbols are 24-bits per symbol or sample, and are being delivered at a sample rate of 48 kHz, then the 1-bit PDM stream (at the output of the converter 9) may be running at 64×48 kHz=3.072 MHz—hence the term “oversampling”. Using this numerical example, the variable delay element 10 in this case may have a resolution or step size of 1/(3.072 MHz)=0.326 microseconds. Contrast that with the period of the original symbol stream's sample rate of 1/48 kHz=21 microseconds, and it can be seen that a relatively fine granularity sub-sample delay is achievable by delaying the 1-bit PDM stream. The variable delay element 10 may be implemented using any suitable arrangement of combinational logic and flip-flops as clocked by an oversampling clock signal that may be produced by the PCM to PDM converter 9 and used to synchronize its output PDM stream.
As described above, an adjustable sub-sample delay can be obtained in the system of
As described above, the block diagram of
The processor 13 could execute the media player application and thereby access a remote computer through the network interface controller 18, and then begin streaming of a motion picture or music file. Alternatively, the file may be stored in the local non-volatile data storage 16. In both cases, the digital audio processor 2 may be configured to perform an audio processing algorithm upon the audio portion of the file, e.g., in the case of 5.1 Surround Sound, at least six audio channels are decoded from a movie file, and in most stereo music files two audio channels are decoded. The digital audio processor 2 may be running a beam forming or spatial filtering algorithm, or other sound enhancing algorithm, that processes the decoded audio channels into digital channels A, B, . . . G (in this case seven digital channels), in order to interface with the standalone speaker array in which seven independently controllable speaker channels are available. In so doing, the digital audio processor 2 may compute up to seven sub-sample delay settings, one for each of the speakers 8 (because it “knows” those are available through the interface 12), and sends those delay settings together with the content in the seven audio channels to the interface 12. These audio channels and delay settings are received in the speaker array side of the interface 12 and then distributed to the individual DACs 14_a, 14_b, . . . for conversion into analog form and then into sound. As a result, a spatially filtered (or otherwise improved) sound is emitted, by the speakers 8. The availability of the sub-sample delay settings and the fact that they are controllable for each channel enables a finer control of the spatial filtering, thereby producing a more accurate sound emission pattern.
It should be noted that while
While certain embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that the invention is not limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, while
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4211997 | Rudnick et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
5204909 | Cowan | Apr 1993 | A |
5682114 | Ohta | Oct 1997 | A |
7894609 | Heinsen | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8198941 | Lesso | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20040087294 | Wang | May 2004 | A1 |
20100329482 | Lee | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Bucket Brigade Delay Line for Analogue Signals”, TDA1022, Jun. 1976, Internet document at: www.classiccmp.org/rtellason/chipdata/tda1022.pdf, (10 pages). |
“Digital Audio Resampling Home Page”, Admitted Prior Art, Internet document at: https://ccrma.stanford.edu/˜jos/resample/, (pp. 1-19). |
Harris, Fredric J., “Multirate Digital Filters for Symbol Timing Synchronization in Software Defined Radios”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 19, No. 12, Dec. 2001, (pp. 2346-2357). |
Hermanowicz, Ewa, “Digital Filter for Quadrature Sub-Sample Delay Estimation”, 15th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2007), Poznan, Poland, Sep. 3-7, 2007 copyright by EURASIP, (pp. 1053-1057). |
Janssen, E., et al., “Chapter 2—Basics of Sigma-Delta Modulation”, Look-Ahead Based Sigma-Delta Modulation, Analog Circuits and Signal Processing, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1387-1—2 [2011, XII, 247 p. 147 illus., Hardcover—ISBN: 978-94-007-1386-4], (pp. 5-28, plus 1 cite page). |
Kite, Ph.D., Thomas, “Understanding PDM Digital Audio”, Audio Precision, Copyright 2012, Beaverton, Oregon USA, (pp. 1-9). |
Kurosawa, Naoki, et al., “Sampling Clock Jitter Effects in Digital-to-Analog Converters”, Elsevier Science Ltd. 2002, Measurement 31 (2002), PII: S0263-2241(01)00028-8, (pp. 187-199). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140161279 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |