Patent Application
20140277146
The present disclosure relates to a support rod connector apparatus for use with, inter alia, spinal implantation rods and related methods of securing implantation rods using a cross-braced bilateral spinal rod connector apparatus. More particularly, this disclosure relates to a novel, cross-braced bilateral support rod connector that enhances the rigidity of bilateral spinal rods anchored to the spine.
The bones and connective tissue of an adult human spinal column consists of more than 20 discrete bones coupled sequentially to one another by a tri-joint complex. The complex consists of an anterior disc and two posterior facet joints. The anterior discs of adjacent bones are cushioned by cartilage spacers referred to as intervertebral discs. The over 20 bones of the spinal column are anatomically categorized as one of four classifications: cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral. The cervical portion of the spine which comprises the top of the spine up to the base of the skull, includes the first 7 vertebrae. The intermediate 12 bones are thoracic vertebrae, and connect to the lower spine comprising the 5 lumbar vertebrae. The base of the spine are sacral bones, including the coccyx.
The spinal column of bones is highly complex in that it includes over 20 bones coupled to one another, housing and protecting critical elements of the nervous system having innumerable peripheral nerves and circulatory bodies in close proximity. Despite its complexity, the spine is a highly flexible structure, capable of a high degree of curvature and twist in nearly every direction.
Genetic or developmental irregularities, trauma, chronic stress, tumors and disease, however, can result in spinal pathologies which either limit this range of motion or threaten the critical elements of the nervous system housed within the spinal column. A variety of systems have been disclosed in the art which achieve immobilization by implanting artificial assemblies in or on the spinal column. These assemblies may be classified as anterior, posterior or lateral implants. Lateral and anterior assemblies are coupled to the anterior portion of the spine which is in the sequence of vertebral bodies. Posterior implants generally comprise pairs of rods (“bilateral spinal support rods”), which are aligned along the axis which the bones are to be disposed, and which are then attached to the spinal column by either hooks which couple to the lamina or attach to the transverse processes, or by screws which are inserted through pedicles.
In order to provide enhanced torsional rigidity to bilateral spinal support rods, these implants generally include cross-connecting devices which couple the rods together, transverse to the axis of the implants. These cross-connecting devices may couple directly to the rods themselves (“rod-to-rod connectors”) or may be attached to pedicle screws (“head-to-head connectors”).
Exemplary prior art references include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,005,562, 5,261,907, 5,334,203, 5,443,465, 5,601,552, 5,651,789, 5,667,507, 5,688,272, 5,716,355, and 5,947,966.
It is desirable to provide cross-connecting devices to increase the rigidity of bilateral spinal rod construct by providing support axially and longitudinally to support the rod construct.
The present invention relates to a spinal rod connector apparatus and methods for implementing same. In particular, the connector apparatus comprises a central member with extension legs, wherein the extension legs are capable of connecting to cylindrical rods, such as a bilateral spinal support rods.
In one embodiment, the spinal rod connector apparatus comprises a monolithic central member with two or more extension legs. The extension legs can be of varying lengths and disposed at varying angles with respect to the monolithic central member, depending upon physiological sizing requirements. Attached to each extension leg is a connecting member capable of connecting to a bilateral spinal rod construct. Each connecting member is translatable along and rotatable about the axis of the corresponding extension leg.
In another embodiment, the connecting member is capable of connecting directly to spinal rod on a bilateral spinal rod construct.
In yet another embodiment, the connecting member is capable of connecting directly to a pedicle screw on a bilateral spinal rod construct.
In another embodiment, the monolithic central member is capable of manipulation for additional angle changes through instrumentation in a manner similar to bending of a spinal rod for additional curvature.
In another embodiment, each connecting member comprises a connecting member comprising a slotted end, wherein the slotted end has a slot sized to receive a spinal rod of a bilateral spinal rod construct, the slot being freely rotatable about the axis of the associated extension leg.
In still another embodiment, the spinal rod connector apparatus comprises an angle-adjustable central member with four extension legs. The angles between each of the four extension legs can be adjusted, depending upon physiological sizing requirements. Moreover, the legs can be of varying lengths. Attached to each of the extension legs is a connecting member capable of connecting to a bilateral spinal rod construct. Each connecting member is translatable along and rotatable about the axis of the associated extension leg.
In yet another embodiment, a method for attaching the cross-braced bilateral rod connector apparatus comprises sequentially sliding the connecting members from a lateral approach and engaging a fastening device to secure same to the bilateral rod connector apparatus.
The benefits of this device over conventional head-to-head connectors is the bracing provided at the unsupported span between the support rods to distribute loading to adjacent joints, contrary to conventional head-to-head connectors which only provide support to screws connected to the same vertebral body. As a result, conventional head-to-head connectors only create a stiffer vertebral body by maintaining a constant spacing between the pedicle screws. This distribution of load across adjacent joints alleviates stress shielding and overloading of adjacent joints.
Compared to older rod-to-rod connectors, the cross-braced version provides the same aforementioned stress distribution benefits and alleviates stress concentration/overloading of the rod itself due to the single load path inherent in the older rod-to-rod connector design.
Variations and modifications from the above-described embodiments exist.
Attached to each extension leg (2) is a connecting member (3) comprising a set-screw (4) and a slot (5). Each connecting member (3) is capable of translating along the longitudinal axis of the associated extension leg (2). Further, each connecting member (3) is capable of complete rotation about the axis of the corresponding extension leg (2).
While various embodiments in accordance with the disclosed principles have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and are not limiting. Thus, the breadth and scope of the invention(s) should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 C.F.R. 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the invention(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that technology is prior art to any invention(s) in this disclosure. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple inventions may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the invention(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings herein.
