Cross-component adaptive loop filtering in video coding

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

This patent document relates to video coding techniques, devices and systems.

BACKGROUND

Currently, efforts are underway to improve the performance of current video codec technologies to provide better compression ratios or provide video coding and decoding schemes that allow for lower complexity or parallelized implementations. Industry experts have recently proposed several new video coding tools and tests are currently underway for determining their effectivity.

SUMMARY

Devices, systems and methods related to digital video coding, and specifically, to management of motion vectors are described. The described methods may be applied to existing video coding standards (e.g., High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) or Versatile Video Coding (VVC)) and future video coding standards or video codecs.

In one representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes making a determination, for a conversion between a current video unit of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is enabled for the current video unit based on a color property of the video. The method also includes performing the conversion according to the determination.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a video comprising multiple portions and a bitstream representation of the video. The bitstream representation conforms to a format rule that specifies that a first syntax element indicating usage of a coding tool for coding at least a first portion of the multiple portions is selectively included in a first video unit of the bitstream representation based on whether a second syntax element is included in a second video unit of the bitstream representation.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, usage of a chroma quantization parameter offset list based on a characteristic of the block. The characteristic comprises a prediction mode, a picture type, a slice type, a tile type, or a brick type of the block. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a quantization parameter used in a deblocking filtering process based on a characteristic of the block. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a picture of a video and a bitstream representation of the video. During the conversion, a quantization parameter for a chroma component of the picture is constrained to be same as a chroma row segment having a length of 4×m and a position of (4×mxx, 2×y) relative a top-left corner of the picture, x and y being non-negative integers and m being a positive integer.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a picture of a video and a bitstream representation of the video. During the conversion, a quantization parameter for a chroma component of the picture is constrained to be same as a chroma column segment having a length of 4×n and a position of (4×n×y, 2×x) relative a top-left corner of the picture, x and y being non-negative integers and n being a positive integer.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide a method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a video unit and a coded representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that when a chroma quantization parameter (QP) table is used to derive parameters of the deblocking filter, processing by the chroma QP table is performed on individual chroma QP values.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide another method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein the chroma QP offsets are at picture/slice/tile/brick/subpicture level.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide another method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein information pertaining to a same luma coding unit is used in the deblocking filter and for deriving a chroma QP offset.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide another method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein an indication of enabling usage of the chroma QP offsets is signaled in the bitstream representation.

In another representative aspect, the disclosed technology may be used to provide another method for video processing. This method includes performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein a boundary strength (BS) of the deblocking filter is calculated without comparing reference pictures and/or a number of motion vectors (MVs) associated with the video unit at a P side boundary with reference pictures of the video unit at a Q side boundary.

Further, in a representative aspect, an apparatus in a video system comprising a processor and a non-transitory memory with instructions thereon is disclosed. The instructions upon execution by the processor, cause the processor to implement any one or more of the disclosed methods.

Additionally, in a representative aspect, a video decoding apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement any one or more of the disclosed methods.

In another representative aspect, a video encoding apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement any one or more of the disclosed methods.

Also, a computer program product stored on a non-transitory computer readable media, the computer program product including program code for carrying out any one or more of the disclosed methods is disclosed.

The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the description and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an example of an overall processing flow of a blocking deblocking filter process.

FIG. 2 shows an example of a flow diagram of a Bs calculation.

FIG. 3 shows an example of a referred information for Bs calculation at coding tree unit (CTU) boundary.

FIG. 4 shows an example of pixels involved in filter on/off decision and strong/weak filter selection.

FIG. 5 shows an example of an overall processing flow of deblocking filter process in VVC.

FIG. 6 shows an example of a luma deblocking filter process in VVC.

FIG. 7 shows an example of a chroma deblocking filter process in VVC

FIG. 8 shows an example of a filter length determination for sub PU boundaries.

FIG. 9A shows an example of center positions of a chroma block.

FIG. 9B shows another example of center positions of a chroma block.

FIG. 10 shows examples of blocks at P side and Q side.

FIG. 11 shows examples of usage of a luma block's decoded information.

FIG. 12 is a block diagram of an example of a hardware platform for implementing a visual media decoding or a visual media encoding technique described in the present document.

FIG. 13 shows a flowchart of an example method for video coding.

FIG. 14A shows an example of Placement of cross component adaptive loop filter (CC-ALF) with respect to other loop filters (b) Diamond shaped filter.

FIG. 14B shows an example of Placement of CC-ALF with respect to Diamond shaped filter.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram that illustrates an example video coding system.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram that illustrates an encoder in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 17 is a block diagram that illustrates a decoder in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 18 is a block diagram of an example video processing system in which disclosed techniques may be implemented.

FIG. 19 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 20 is a flowchart representation of another method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 21 is a flowchart representation of another method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 22 is a flowchart representation of another method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 23 is a flowchart representation of another method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 24 is a flowchart representation of another method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 25 is a flowchart representation of yet another method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION
1. Video Coding in HEVC/H.265

Video coding standards have evolved primarily through the development of the well-known International Telecommunication Union-Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. The ITU-T produced H.261 and H.263, ISO/IEC produced Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)-1 and MPEG-4 Visual, and the two organizations jointly produced the H.262/MPEG-2 Video and H.264/MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and H.265/HEVC standards. Since H.262, the video coding standards are based on the hybrid video coding structure wherein temporal prediction plus transform coding are utilized. To explore the future video coding technologies beyond HEVC, Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) was founded by Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) and MPEG jointly in 2015. Since then, many new methods have been adopted by JVET and put into the reference software named Joint Exploration Model (JEM). In April 2018, the Joint Video Expert Team (JVET) between VCEG (Q6/16) and ISO/IEC Joint technical committee (JTC) 1 sub-committee (SC) 29/working group (WG) 11 (MPEG) was created to work on the VVC standard targeting at 50% bitrate reduction compared to HEVC.

2.1. Deblocking Scheme in HEVC

A deblocking filter process is performed for each CU in the same order as the decoding process. First, vertical edges are filtered (horizontal filtering), then horizontal edges are filtered (vertical filtering). Filtering is applied to 8×8 block boundaries which are determined to be filtered, for both luma and chroma components. 4×4 block boundaries are not processed in order to reduce the complexity.

FIG. 1 illustrates the overall processing flow of deblocking filter process. A boundary can have three filtering status: no filtering, weak filtering and strong filtering. Each filtering decision is based on boundary strength, Bs, and threshold values, β and t_C.

Three kinds of boundaries may be involved in the filtering process: CU boundary, TU boundary and PU boundary. CU boundaries, which are outer edges of CU, are always involved in the filtering since CU boundaries are always also TU boundary or PU boundary. When PU shape is 2N×N (N>4) and residual quad tree (RQT) depth is equal to 1, TU boundary at 8×8 block grid and PU boundary between each PU inside CU are involved in the filtering. One exception is that when the PU boundary is inside the TU, the boundary is not filtered.

2.1.1. Boundary Strength Calculation

Generally speaking, boundary strength (Bs) reflects how strong filtering is needed for the boundary. If Bs is large, strong filtering should be considered.

Let P and Q be defined as blocks which are involved in the filtering, where P represents the block located in left (vertical edge case) or above (horizontal edge case) side of the boundary and Q represents the block located in right (vertical edge case) or above (horizontal edge case) side of the boundary. FIG. 2 illustrates how the Bs value is calculated based on the intra coding mode, existence of non-zero transform coefficients and motion information, reference picture, number of motion vectors and motion vector difference.

Bs is calculated on a 4×4 block basis, but it is re-mapped to an 8×8 grid. The maximum of the two values of Bs which correspond to 8 pixels consisting of a line in the 4×4 grid is selected as the Bs for boundaries in the 8×8 grid.

In order to reduce line buffer memory requirement, only for CTU boundary, information in every second block (4×4 grid) in left or above side is re-used as depicted in FIG. 3.

2.1.2. β and t_CDecision

Threshold values β and t_Cwhich involving in filter on/off decision, strong and weak filter selection and weak filtering process are derived based on luma quantization parameter of P and Q blocks, QP_pand QP_Q, respectively. Q used to derive β and t_Cis calculated as follows.

Q=((QP_P+QP_Q+1)>>1).

A variable β is derived as shown in Table 1, based on Q. If Bs is greater than 1, the variable t_Cis specified as Table 1 with Clip3(0, 55, Q+2) as input. Otherwise (BS is equal or less than 1), the variable t_Cis specified as Table 1 with Q as input.

TABLE 1

Derivation of threshold variables β and t_Cfrom input Q

Q
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

β
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
7
8

t_C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

Q
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

β
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36

t_C
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4

Q
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

β
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
64
64
64
64

t_C
5
5
6
6
7
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14

2.1.3. Filter on/Off Decision for 4 Lines

Filter on/off decision is done for four lines as a unit. FIG. 4 illustrates the pixels involving in filter on/off decision. The 6 pixels in the two red boxes for the first four lines are used to determine filter on/off for 4 lines. The 6 pixels in two red boxes for the second 4 lines are used to determine filter on/off for the second four lines.

If dp0+dq0+dp3+dq3<β, filtering for the first four lines is turned on and strong/weak filter selection process is applied. Each variable is derived as follows.

$dp 0 = ❘ p_{2, 0} - 2 * p_{1, 0} + p_{0, 0} ❘,$

$dp 3 = ❘ p_{2, 3} - 2 * p_{1, 3} + p_{0, 3} ❘,$

$dp 4 = ❘ p_{2, 4} - 2 * p_{1, 4} + p_{0, 4} ❘,$

$dp 7 = ❘ p_{2, 7} - 2 * p_{1, 7} + p_{0, 7} ❘$

$dq 0 = ❘ q_{2, 0} - 2 * q_{1, 0} + q_{0, 0} ❘,$

$dq 3 = ❘ q_{2, 3} - 2 * q_{1, 3} + q_{0, 3} ❘,$

$dq 4 = ❘ q_{2, 4} - 2 * q_{1, 4} + q_{0, 4} ❘,$

$dq 7 = ❘ q_{2, 7} - 2 * q_{1, 7} + q_{0, 7} ❘$

If the condition is not met, no filtering is done for the first 4 lines. Additionally, if the condition is met, dE, dEp1 and dEp2 are derived for weak filtering process. The variable dE is set equal to 1. If dp0+dp3<(β+(β>>1))>>3, the variable dEp1 is set equal to 1. If dq0+dq3<(β+(β>>1))>>3, the variable dEq1 is set equal to 1.

For the second four lines, decision is made in a same fashion with above.

2.1.4. Strong/Weak Filter Selection for 4 Lines

After the first four lines are determined to filtering on in filter on/off decision, if following two conditions are met, strong filter is used for filtering of the first four lines. Otherwise, weak filter is used for filtering. Involving pixels are same with those used for filter on/off decision as depicted in FIG. 4.

2*(dp0+dq0)<(β>>2),|p3₀−p0₀|+|q0₀−q3₀|<(β>>3) and |p0₀−q0₀|<(5*t_C+1)>>1 1)
2*(dp3+dq3)<(β>>2),|p3₃−p0₃|+|q0₃−q3₃|<(β>>3) and p0₃−q0₃|<(5*t_C+1)>>1 2)

As a same fashion, if following two conditions are met, strong filter is used for filtering of the second 4 lines. Otherwise, weak filter is used for filtering.

2*(dp4+dq4)<(β>>2),|p3₄−p0₄|+|q0₄−q3₄|<(β>>3) and p0₄−q0₄|<(5*t_C+1)>>1 1)
2*(dp7+dq7)<(β>>2),|p3₇−p0₇|+|q0₇-q3₇|<(β>>3) and |p0₇−q0₇|<(5*t_C+1)>>1 2)

2.1.4.1. Strong Filtering

For strong filtering, filtered pixel values are obtained by following equations. It is worth to note that three pixels are modified using four pixels as an input for each P and Q block, respectively.

p₀′=(p₂+2*p₁+2*p₀+2*q_o+q₁+4)>>3
q₀′=(p₁+2*p₀+2*q₀+2*q₁+q₂+4)>>3
p₁′=(p₂+p₁+p₀+q₀+2)>>2
q₁′=(p₀+q₀+q₁+q₂+2)>2
p₂′=(2*p₃+3*p₂+p₁+p₀+q₀+4)>>3
q₂′=(p₀+q₀+q₁+3*q₂+2*q₃+4)>>3

2.1.4.2. Weak Filtering

Let's define Δ as follows.

Δ=(9*(q₀−p₀)−3*(q₁−p₁)+8)>>4

When abs(Δ) is less than t_C*10,

Δ=Clip3(−t_C,t_C,Δ)
p₀′=Clip1_Y(p₀+Δ)
q₀′=Clip1_Y(q₀−Δ)

If dEp1 is equal to 1,

Δp=Clip3(−(t_C>>1),t_C>>1,(((p₂+p₀+1)>>1)−p₁+Δ)>>1)
p₁′=Clip1_Y(p₁+Δp)

If dEq1 is equal to 1,

Δq=Clip3(−(t_C>>1),t_C>>1,(((q₂+q₀+1)>>1)−q₁−Δ)>>1)
q₁′=Clip1_Y(q₁+Δq)

It is worth to note that maximum two pixels are modified using three pixels as an input for each P and Q block, respectively.

2.1.4.3. Chroma Filtering

Bs of chroma filtering is inherited from luma. If Bs>1 or if coded chroma coefficient existing case, chroma filtering is performed. No other filtering decision is there. And only one filter is applied for chroma. No filter selection process for chroma is used. The filtered sample values p₀′ and q₀′ are derived as follows.

Δ=Clip3(−t_C,t_C,((((q₀−p₀)<<2)+p₁−q₁+4)>>3))
p₀′=Clip1_C(p₀+Δ)
q₀′=Clip1_C(q₀−Δ)

2.2 Deblocking Scheme in VVC

In the VTM6, deblocking filtering process is mostly the same to those in HEVC. However, the following modifications are added.

- A) The filter strength of the deblocking filter dependent of the averaged luma level of the reconstructed samples.
- B) Deblocking t_Ctable extension and adaptation to 10-bit video.
- C) 4×4 grid deblocking for luma.
- D) Stronger deblocking filter for luma.
- E) Stronger deblocking filter for chroma.
- F) Deblocking filter for subblock boundary.
- G) Deblocking decision adapted to smaller difference in motion.

FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart of deblocking filters process in VVC for a coding unit.

2.2.1. Filter Strength Dependent on Reconstructed Average Luma

In HEVC, the filter strength of the deblocking filter is controlled by the variables β and t_Cwhich are derived from the averaged quantization parameters qP_L. In the VV test model (VTM) 6, deblocking filter controls the strength of the deblocking filter by adding offset to qP_Laccording to the luma level of the reconstructed samples if the SPS flag of this method is true. The reconstructed luma level (LL) is derived as follow:

LL=((p_0,0+p_0,3+q_0,0+q_0,3)>>2)/(1<<bitDepth) (3-1)

where, the sample values p_i,kand q_i,kwith i=0 . . . 3 and k=0 and 3 can be derived. Then LL is used to decide the offset qpOffset based on the threshold signaled in SPS. After that, the qP_L, which is derived as follows, is employed to derive the β and t_C.

qP_L=((Qp_Q+Qp_P+1)>>1)+qpOffset (3-2)

where Qp_Qand Qp_Pdenote the quantization parameters of the coding units containing the sample q_{0, 0}and p_0,0, respectively. In the current VVC, this method is only applied on the luma deblocking process.

2.2.2. 4×4 Deblocking Grid for Luma

HEVC uses an 8×8 deblocking grid for both luma and chroma. In VTM6, deblocking on a 4×4 grid for luma boundaries was introduced to handle blocking artifacts from rectangular transform shapes. Parallel friendly luma deblocking on a 4×4 grid is achieved by restricting the number of samples to be deblocked to 1 sample on each side of a vertical luma boundary where one side has a width of 4 or less or to 1 sample on each side of a horizontal luma boundary where one side has a height of 4 or less.

2.2.3. Boundary Strength Derivation for Luma

The detailed boundary strength derivation could be found in Table 2. The conditions in Table 2 are checked sequentially.

TABLE 2

Boundary strength derivation

Conditions
Y
U
V

P and Q are BDPCM
0
N/A
N/A

P or Q is intra
2
2
2

It is a transform block edge, and P or Q is CIIP
2
2
2

It is a transform block edge, and P or Q has non-zero transform
1
1
1

coefficients

It is a transform block edge, and P or Q is JCCR
N/A
1
1

P and Q are in different coding modes
1
1
1

One or more of the following conditions are true:
1
N/A
N/A

1.
P and Q are both intra block copy (IBC), and the block

vector (BV) distance >= half-pel in x- or y-di

2.
P and Q have different ref pictures*, or have different

number of MVs

3.
Both P and Q have only one mv, and the MV distance >=

half -pel in x- or y-dir

4.
P has two MVs pointing to two different ref pictures, and P

and Q have same ref pictures in the list 0 , the MV pair in

the list 0 or list 1 has a distance >= half-pel in x- or y-dir

5.
P has two MVs pointing to two different ref pictures, and P

and Q have different ref pictures in the list 0, the MV of P

in the list 0 and the MV of Q in the list 1 have the

distance >= half-pel in x- or y-dir, or the MV of P in the list

1 and the MV of Q in the list 0 have the distance >= half-pel

in x- or y-dir

6.
Both P and Q have two MVs pointing to the same ref

pictures, and both of the following two conditions are

satisfied:

∘
The MV of P in the list 0 and the MV of Q in the list

0 has a distance >= half-pel in x- or y-dir or the MV

of P in the list 1 and the MV of Q in the list 1 has a

distance >= half-pel in x- or y-dir

∘
The MV of P in the list 0 and the MV of Q in the list

1 has a distance >= half-pel in x- or y-dir or the MV

of P in the list 1 and the MV of Q in the list 0 has a

distance >= half-pel in x- or y-dir

*Note: The determination of whether the reference pictures used for the two

coding sublocks are the same or different is based only on which pictures are

referenced, without regard to whether a prediction is formed using an index

into reference picture list 0 or an index into reference picture list 1, and also

without regard to whether the index position within a reference picture list is

different.

Otherwise
0
0
0

2.2.4. Stronger Deblocking Filter for Luma

The proposal uses a bilinear filter when samples at either one side of a boundary belong to a large block. A sample belonging to a large block is defined as when the width>32 for a vertical edge, and when height>=32 for a horizontal edge.

The bilinear filter is listed below.

Block boundary samples pi for i=0 to Sp-1 and qi for j=0 to Sq-1 (pi and qi follow the definitions in HEVC deblocking described above) are then replaced by linear interpolation as follows:

p_i′=(f_i*Middle_s,t+(64−f_i)*P_s+32)>>6),clipped to p_i±tcPD_i
q_j′=(g_j*Middle_s,t+(64−g_j)*Q_s+32)>>6),clipped to q_j±tcPD_j

where tcPD_iand tcPD_jterm is a position dependent clipping described in Section 2.2.5 and g_j, f_i, Middle_s,t, P_sand Q_sare given below:

Sp, Sq
f_i= 59 − i * 9, can also be described as f = {59,50,41,32,23,14,5}

7, 7
g_j= 59 − j * 9, can also be described as g = {59,50,41,32,23,14,5}

(p side: 7,
Middle_{7, 7}= (2 * (p_o+ q_o) + p₁+ q₁+ p₂+ q₂+p₃+ q₃+p₄+ q₄+p₅+ q₅+p₆+ q₆

q side: 7)
+ 8) >> 4

P₇= (p₆+ p₇+ 1) >> 1, Q₇= (q₆+ q₇+ 1) >> 1

7, 3
f_i= 59 − i * 9, can also be described as f = {59,50,41,32,23,14,5}

(p side: 7
g_j= 53 − j * 21, can also be described as g = {53,32,11}

q side: 3)
Middle_{7, 3}= (2 * (p_o+ q_o) + q₀+ 2 * (q₁+ q₂) + p₁+ q₁+ p₂+p₃+p₄+p₅+ p₆+

8) >> 4

P₇= (p₆+ p₇+ 1) >> 1, Q₃= (q₂+ q₃+ 1) >> 1

3, 7
g_j= 59 − j * 9, can also be described as g = {59,50,41,32,23,14,5}

(p side: 3
f_i= 53 − i * 21, can also be described as f = {53,32,11}

q side: 7)
Middle_3.7= (2 * (q_o+ p_o) + p₀+ 2 * (p₁+ p₂) + q₁+ p₁+ q₂+q₃+q₄+q₅+ q₆+

8) >> 4

Q₇= (q₆+ q₇+ 1) >> 1, P₃= (p₂+ p₃+ 1) >> 1

7, 5
g_j= 58 − j * 13, can also be described as g = {58,45,32,19,6}

(p side: 7
f_i= 59 − i * 9, can also be described as f = {59,50,41,32,23,14,5}

q side: 5)
Middle7, 5 = (2 * (p_o+ q_o+ p₁+ q₁) + q₂+ p₂+ q₃+ p₃+ q₄+ p₄+ q₅+ p₅+ 8)

>> 4

Q₅= (q₄+ q₅+ 1) >> 1, P₇= (p₆+ p₇+ 1) >> 1

5, 7
g_j= 59 − j * 9, can also be described as g = {59,50,41,32,23,14,5}

(p side: 5
f_i= 58 − i * 13, can also be described as f = {58,45,32,19,6}

q side: 7)
Middle5, 7 = (2 * (q_o+ p_o+ p₁+ q₁) + q₂+ p₂+ q₃+ p₃+ q₄+ p₄+ q₅+ p₅+ 8)

>> 4

Q₇= (q₆+ q₇+ 1) >> 1, P₅= (p₄+ p₅+ 1) >> 1

5, 5
g_j= 58 − j * 13, can also be described as g = {58,45,32,19,6}

(p side: 5
f_i= 58 − i * 13, can also be described as f = {58,45,32,19,6}

q side: 5)
Middle5,5 = (2 * (q_o+ p_o+ p₁+ q₁+ q₂+ p₂) + q₃+ p₃+ q₄+ p₄+ 8) >> 4

Q₅= (q₄+ q₅+ 1) >> 1, P₅= (p₄+ p₅+ 1) >> 1

5, 3
g_j= 53 − j * 21, can also be described as g = {53,32,11}

(p side: 5
f_i= 58 − i * 13, can also be described as f = {58,45,32,19,6}

q side: 3)
Middle5,3 = (q_o+ p_o+ p₁+ q₁+ q₂+ p₂+ q₃+ p₃+ 4) >> 3

Q₃= (q₂+ q₃+1) >> 1, P₅= (p₄+ p₅+ 1) >> 1

3, 5
g_j= 58 − j * 13, can also be described as g = {58,45,32,19,6}

(p side: 3
f_i= 53 − i * 21, can also be described as f = {53,32,11}

q side: 5)
Middle3,5 = (q_o+ p_o+ p₁+ q₁+ q₂+ p₂+ q₃+ p₃+ 4) >> 3

Q₅= (q₄+ q₅+ 1) >> 1, P₃= (p₂+ p₃+ 1) >> 1

2.2.5. Deblocking Control for Luma

The deblocking decision process is described in this sub-section.

Wider-stronger luma filter is filters are used only if all of the Condition1, Condition2 and Condition 3 are TRUE.

The condition 1 is the “large block condition”. This condition detects whether the samples at P-side and Q-side belong to large blocks, which are represented by the variable bSidePisLargeBlk and bSideQisLargeBlk respectively. The bSidePisLargeBlk and bSideQisLargeBlk are defined as follows.

bSidePisLargeBlk=((edge type is vertical and p₀belongs to CU with width>=32)∥(edge type is horizontal and p₀belongs to CU with height>=32))?TRUE: FALSE
bSideQisLargeBlk=((edge type is vertical and q₀belongs to CU with width>=32)∥(edge type is horizontal and q₀belongs to CU with height>=32))?TRUE: FALSE

Based on bSidePisLargeBlk and bSideQisLargeBlk, the condition 1 is defined as follows.

Condition1=(bSidePisLargeBlk∥bSidePisLargeBlk)?TRUE: FALSE

Next, if Condition 1 is true, the condition 2 will be further checked. First, the following variables are derived:

dp0, dp3, dq0, dq3 are first derived as in HEVC

if (p side is greater than or equal to 32)

dp0=(dp0+Abs(p_5,0−2*p_4,0+p_3,0)+1)>>1
dp3=(dp3+Abs(p_5,3−2*p_4,3+p_3,3)+1)>>1

if (q side is greater than or equal to 32)

dq0=(dq0+Abs(q_5,0−2*q_4,0+q_3,0)+1)>>1
dq3=(dq3+Abs(q_5,3−2*q_4,3+q_3,3)+1)>>1

dpq0, dpq3, dp, dq, d are then derived as in HEVC.

Then the condition 2 is defined as follows.

Condition2=(d<β)?TRUE: FALSE

Where d=dp0+dq0+dp3+dq3, as shown in section 2.1.4.

If Condition1 and Condition2 are valid it is checked if any of the blocks uses sub-blocks:

If(bSidePisLargeBlk)

If(mode block P == SUBBLOCKMODE)

Sp =5

else

Sp =7

else

Sp = 3

If(bSideQisLargeBlk)

If(mode block Q == SUBBLOCKMODE)

Sq =5

else

Sq =7

else

Sq = 3

Finally, if both the Condition 1 and Condition 2 are valid, the proposed deblocking method will check the condition 3 (the large block Strong filter condition), which is defined as follows. In the Condition3 StrongFilterCondition, the following variables are derived:

dpq is derived as in HEVC.

sp3 = Abs(p3 − p0 ), derived as in HEVC

if (p side is greater than or equal to 32)

if(Sp===5)

sp3 = ( sp3 + Abs( p5 − p3 ) + 1) >> 1

else

sp3 = ( sp3 + Abs( p7 − p3 ) + 1) >> 1

sq3 = Abs( q0 − q3 ), derived as in HEVC

if (q side is greater than or equal to 32)

If(Sq==5)

sq3 = ( sq3 + Abs( q5 − q3 ) + 1) >> 1

else

sq3 = ( sq3 + Abs( q7 − q3 ) + 1) >> 1

As in HEVC derive, StrongFilterCondition=(dpq is less than ((β>>2), sp3+sq3 is less than (3*β>>5), and Abs(p0−q0) is less than (5*tC+1)>>1) ? TRUE: FALSE

FIG. 6 depicts the flowchart of luma deblocking filter process.

2.2.6. Strong Deblocking Filter for Chroma

The following strong deblocking filter for chroma is defined:

p₂′=(3*p₃+2*p₂+p₁+p₀+q₀+4)>>3
p₁′=(2*p₃+p₂+2*p₁+p₀+q₀+q₁+4)>>3
p₀′=(p₃+p₂+p₁+2*p₀+q₀+q₁+q₂+4)>>3

The proposed chroma filter performs deblocking on a 4×4 chroma sample grid.

2.2.7. Deblocking Control for Chroma

The above chroma filter performs deblocking on a 8×8 chroma sample grid. The chroma strong filters are used on both sides of the block boundary. Here, the chroma filter is selected when both sides of the chroma edge are greater than or equal to 8 (in unit of chroma sample), and the following decision with three conditions are satisfied. The first one is for decision of boundary strength as well as large block. The second and third one are basically the same as for HEVC luma decision, which are on/off decision and strong filter decision, respectively.

FIG. 7 depicts the flowchart of chroma deblocking filter process.

2.2.8. Position Dependent Clipping

The proposal also introduces a position dependent clipping tcPD which is applied to the output samples of the luma filtering process involving strong and long filters that are modifying 7, 5 and 3 samples at the boundary. Assuming quantization error distribution, it is proposed to increase clipping value for samples which are expected to have higher quantization noise, thus expected to have higher deviation of the reconstructed sample value from the true sample value.

For each P or Q boundary filtered with proposed asymmetrical filter, depending on the result of decision making process described in Section 2.2, position dependent threshold table is selected from Tc7 and Tc3 tables that are provided to decoder as a side information:

Tc7={6,5,4,3,2,1,1};
Tc3={6,4,2};
tcPD=(SP==3)?Tc3: Tc7;
tcQD=(SQ==3)?Tc3: Tc7;

For the P or Q boundaries being filtered with a short symmetrical filter, position dependent threshold of lower magnitude is applied:

Tc3={3,2,1};

Following defining the threshold, filtered p′i and q′i sample values are clipped according to tcP and tcQ clipping values:

p″_i=clip3(p′_i+tcP_i,p′_i−tcP_i,p′_i);
q″_j=clip3(q′_j+tcQ_j,q′_j−tcQ_j,q′_j);

where p′_iand q′_iare filtered sample values, p″_iand q″_jare output sample value after the clipping and tcP_itcP_iare clipping thresholds that are derived from the VVC tc parameter and tcPD and tcQD. Term clip3 is a clipping function as it is specified in VVC.

2.2.9. Sub-Block Deblocking Adjustment

To enable parallel friendly deblocking using both long filters and sub-block deblocking the long filters is restricted to modify at most 5 samples on a side that uses sub-block deblocking (AFFINE or advanced temporal motion vector prediction (ATMVP)) as shown in the luma control for long filters. Additionally, the sub-block deblocking is adjusted such that that sub-block boundaries on an 8×8 grid that are close to a CU or an implicit TU boundary is restricted to modify at most two samples on each side.

Following applies to sub-block boundaries that not are aligned with the CU boundary.

If(mode block Q == SUBBLOCKMODE && edge !=0){

if (!(implicitTU && (edge == (64 / 4))))

if (edge == 2 || edge == (orthogonalLength − 2) || edge == (56 / 4) ||

edge == (72 / 4))

Sp = Sq = 2;

else

Sp = Sq = 3;

else

Sp = Sq = bSideQisLargeBlk? 5:3

}

Where edge equal to 0 corresponds to CU boundary, edge equal to 2 or equal to orthogonalLength-2 corresponds to sub-block boundary 8 samples from a CU boundary etc. Where implicit TU is true if implicit split of TU is used. FIG. 8 show the flowcharts of determination process for TU boundaries and sub-PU boundaries.

Filtering of horizontal boundary is limiting Sp=3 for luma, Sp=1 and Sq=1 for chroma, when the horizontal boundary is aligned with the CTU boundary.

2.2.10. Deblocking Decision Adapted to Smaller Difference in Motion

HEVC enables deblocking of a prediction unit boundary when the difference in at least one motion vector component between blocks on respective side of the boundary is equal to or larger than a threshold of 1 sample. In VTM6, a threshold of a half luma sample is introduced to also enable removal of blocking artifacts originating from boundaries between inter prediction units that have a small difference in motion vectors.

2.3. Combined Inter and Intra Prediction (CIIP)

In VTM6, when a CU is coded in merge mode, if the CU contains at least 64 luma samples (that is, CU width times CU height is equal to or larger than 64), and if both CU width and CU height are less than 128 luma samples, an additional flag is signalled to indicate if the combined inter/intra prediction (CIIP) mode is applied to the current CU. As its name indicates, the CIIP prediction combines an inter prediction signal with an intra prediction signal. The inter prediction signal in the CIIP mode P_interis derived using the same inter prediction process applied to regular merge mode; and the intra prediction signal P_intrais derived following the regular intra prediction process with the planar mode. Then, the intra and inter prediction signals are combined using weighted averaging, where the weight value is calculated depending on the coding modes of the top and left neighbouring blocks as follows:

- If the top neighbor is available and intra coded, then set isIntraTop to 1, otherwise set isIntraTop to 0;
- If the left neighbor is available and intra coded, then set isIntraLeft to 1, otherwise set isIntraLeft to 0;
- If (isIntraLeft+isIntraLeft) is equal to 2, then wt is set to 3;
- Otherwise, if (isIntraLeft+isIntraLeft) is equal to 1, then wt is set to 2;
- Otherwise, set wt to 1.

The CIIP prediction is formed as follows:

P_CIIP=((4−wt)*P_inter+wt*P_intra+2)>>2

2.4. Chroma QP Table Design in VTM-6.0

In some embodiments, a chroma QP table is used. In some embodiments, a signalling mechanism is used for chroma QP tables, which enables that it is flexible to provide encoders the opportunity to optimize the table for standard dynamic range (SDR) and high dynamic range (HDR) content. It supports for signalling the tables separately for Cb and Cr components. The proposed mechanism signals the chroma QP table as a piece-wise linear function.

2.5. Transform Skip(TS)

As in HEVC, the residual of a block can be coded with transform skip mode. To avoid the redundancy of syntax coding, the transform skip flag is not signalled when the CU level MTS_CU_flag is not equal to zero. The block size limitation for transform skip is the same to that for multi transform selection (MTS) in JEM4, which indicate that transform skip is applicable for a CU when both block width and height are equal to or less than 32. Note that implicit MTS transform is set to discrete cosine transform (DCT) 2 when Low-Frequency Non-Separable Transform (LFNST) or Matrix-based Intra Prediction (MIP) is activated for the current CU. Also the implicit MTS can be still enabled when MTS is enabled for inter coded blocks.

In addition, for transform skip block, minimum allowed Quantization Parameter (QP) is defined as 6*(internalBitDepth−inputBitDepth)+4.

2.6. Joint Coding of Chroma Residuals (JCCR)

In some embodiments, the chroma residuals are coded jointly. The usage (activation) of a joint chroma coding mode is indicated by a TU-level flag tu_joint_cbcr_residual_flag and the selected mode is implicitly indicated by the chroma coded block flags (CBFs). The flag tu_joint_cbcr_residual_flag is present if either or both chroma CBFs for a TU are equal to 1. In the PPS and slice header, chroma QP offset values are signalled for the joint chroma residual coding mode to differentiate from the usual chroma QP offset values signalled for regular chroma residual coding mode. These chroma QP offset values are used to derive the chroma QP values for those blocks coded using the joint chroma residual coding mode. When a corresponding joint chroma coding mode (modes 2 in Table 3) is active in a TU, this chroma QP offset is added to the applied luma-derived chroma QP during quantization and decoding of that TU. For the other modes (modes 1 and 3 in Table 3 Reconstruction of chroma residuals. The value CSign is a sign value (+1 or −1), which is specified in the slice header, resJointC[ ][ ] is the transmitted residual), the chroma QPs are derived in the same way as for conventional Cb or Cr blocks. The reconstruction process of the chroma residuals (resCb and resCr) from the transmitted transform blocks is depicted in Table 3. When this mode is activated, one single joint chroma residual block (resJointC[x][y] in Table 3) is signalled, and residual block for Cb (resCb) and residual block for Cr (resCr) are derived considering information such as tu_cbf_cb, tu_cbf_cr, and CSign, which is a sign value specified in the slice header.

At the encoder side, the joint chroma components are derived as explained in the following. Depending on the mode (listed in the tables above), resJointC{1,2} are generated by the encoder as follows:

- If mode is equal to 2 (single residual with reconstruction Cb=C, Cr=CSign*C), the joint residual is determined according to
  
  resJointC[x][y]=(resCb[x][y]+CSign*resCr[x][y])/2.
- Otherwise, if mode is equal to 1 (single residual with reconstruction Cb=C, Cr=(CSign*C)/2), the joint residual is determined according to
  
  resJointC[x][y]=(4*resCb[x][y]+2*CSign*resCr[x][y])/5.
- Otherwise (mode is equal to 3, i. e., single residual, reconstruction Cr=C, Cb=(CSign*C)/2), the joint residual is determined according to
  
  resJointC[x][y]=(4*resCr[x][y]+2*CSign*resCb[x][y])/5.

TABLE 3

Reconstruction of chroma residuals. The value CSign is a sign value (+1 or −1),

which is specified in the slice header, resJointC[ ][ ] is the transmitted residual.

tu_cbf_cb
tu_cbf_cr
reconstruction of Cb and Cr residuals
mode

1
0
resCb[ x ][ y ] = resJointC[ x ][ y ]
1

resCr[ x ][ y ] = ( CSign * resJointC[ x ][ y ] ) >> 1

1
1
resCb[ x ][ y ] = resJointC[ x ][ y ]
2

resCr[ x ][ y ] = CSign * resJointC[ x ][ y ]

0
1
resCb[ x ][ y ] = ( CSign * resJointC[ x ][ y ] ) >> 1
3

resCr[ x ][ y ] = resJointC[ x ][ y ]

Different QPs are utilized are the above three modes. For mode 2, the QP offset signaled in PPS for JCCR coded block is applied, while for other two modes, it is not applied, instead, the QP offset signaled in PPS for non-JCCR coded block is applied.

The corresponding specification is as follows:

8.7.1 Derivation Process for Quantization Parameters

The variable Qp_Yis derived as follows:

Qp_Y=((qP_{Y_PRED}+CuQpDeltaVal+64+2*QpBdOffset_Y)%(64+QpBdOffset_Y))−QpBdOffset_Y (8-933)

The luma quantization parameter Qp′_Yis derived as follows:

Qp′_Y=Qp_Y+QpBdOffset_Y (8-934)

When ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0 and treeType is equal to SINGLE_TREE or DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the following applies:

- When treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the variable Qp_Yis set equal to the luma quantization parameter Qp_Yof the luma coding unit that covers the luma location (xCb+cbWidth/2, yCb+cbHeight/2).
- The variables qP_Cb, qP_Crand qP_CbCrare derived as follows:
  
  qPi_Chroma=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,Qp_Y) (8-935)
  qPi_Cb=ChromaQpTable[0][qPi_Chroma] (8-936)
  qPi_Cr=ChromaQpTable[1][qPi_Chroma] (8-937)
  qPi_CbCr=ChromaQpTable[2][qPi_Chroma] (8-938)
- The chroma quantization parameters for the Cb and Cr components, Qp′_Cband Qp′_Cr, and joint Cb-Cr coding Qp′_CbCrare derived as follows:
  
  Qp′_Cb=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,qP_Cb+pps_cb_qp_offset+slice_cb_qp_offset+CuQpOffset_Cb)+QpBdOffset_C (8-939)
  Qp′_Cr=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,qP_Cr+pps_cr_qp_offset+slice_cr_qp_offset+CuQpOffset_Cr)+QpBdOffset_C (8-940)
  Qp′_CbCr=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,qP_CbCr+pps_cbcr_qp_offset+slice_cbcr_qp_offset+CuQpOffset_CbCr)+QpBdOffset_C (8-941)
  
  8.7.3 Scaling Process for Transform Coefficients
  
  Inputs to this process are:
- a luma location (xTbY, yTbY) specifying the top-left sample of the current luma transform block relative to the top-left luma sample of the current picture,
- a variable nTbW specifying the transform block width,
- a variable nTbH specifying the transform block height,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour component of the current block,
- a variable bitDepth specifying the bit depth of the current colour component.
  
  Output of this process is the (nTbW)×(nTbH) array d of scaled transform coefficients with elements d[x][y]. The quantization parameter qP is derived as follows:
- If cIdx is equal to 0 and transform_skip_flag[xTbY][yTbY] is equal to 0, the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_Y (8-950)
- Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 0 (and transform_skip_flag[xTbY][yTbY] is equal to 1), the following applies:
  
  qP=Max(QpPrimeTsMin,Qp′_Y) (8-951)
- Otherwise, if TuCResMode[xTbY][yTbY] is equal to 2, the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_CbCr (8-952)
- Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 1, the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_Cb (8-953)
- Otherwise (cIdx is equal to 2), the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_Cr (8-954)

2.7. Cross-Component Adaptive Loop Filter (CC-ALF)

FIG. 14A illustrates the placement of CC-ALF with respect to the other loop filters. CC-ALF operates by applying a linear, diamond shaped filter (FIG. 14b) to the luma channel for each chroma component, which is expressed as

ΔI_i(x,y)=Σ_(x₀_,y₀_)∈S_iI₀(x_C+x₀,y_C+

where

- (x, y) is chroma component i location being refined
- (x_c, y_c) is the luma location based on (x, y)
- S_iis filter support in luma for chroma component i
- c_i(x₀, y₀) represents the filter coefficients

Key features characteristics of the CC-ALF process include:

- The luma location (x_C, y_C), around which the support region is centered, is computed based on the spatial scaling factor between the luma and chroma planes.
- All filter coefficients are transmitted in the adaptation parameter set (APS) and have 8-bit dynamic range.
- An APS may be referenced in the slice header.
- CC-ALF coefficients used for each chroma component of a slice are also stored in a buffer corresponding to a temporal sublayer. Reuse of these sets of temporal sublayer filter coefficients is facilitated using slice-level flags.
- The application of the CC-ALF filters is controlled on a variable block size and signalled by a context-coded flag received for each block of samples. The block size along with an CC-ALF enabling flag is received at the slice-level for each chroma component.
- Boundary padding for the horizontal virtual boundaries makes use of repetition. For the remaining boundaries the same type of padding is used as for regular ALF.

3. Drawbacks of Existing Implementations

DMVR and bidirectional optical flow (BIO) do not involve the original signal during refining the motion vectors, which may result in coding blocks with inaccurate motion information. Also, DMVR and BIO sometimes employ the fractional motion vectors after the motion refinements while screen videos usually have integer motion vectors, which makes the current motion information more inaccurate and make the coding performance worse.

- 1. The interaction between chroma QP table and chroma deblocking may have problems, e.g. chroma QP table should be applied to individual QP but not weighted sum of QPs.
- 2. The logic of luma deblocking filtering process is complicated for hardware design.
- 3. The logic of boundary strength derivation is too complicated for both software and hardware design.
- 4. In the BS decision process, JCCR is treated separately from those blocks coded without JCCR applied. However, JCCR is only a special way to code the residual. Therefore, such design may bring additional complexity without no clear benefits.
- 5. In chroma edge decision, Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the Qp_Yvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively. However, in the quantization/de-quantization process, the QP for a chroma sample is derived from the QP of luma block covering the corresponding luma sample of the center position of current chroma CU. When dual tree is enabled, the different locations of luma blocks may result in different QPs. Therefore, in the chroma deblocking process, wrong QPs may be used for filter decision. Such a misalignment may result in visual artifacts. An example is shown in FIG. 9, including FIG. 9(a) and FIG. 9(b). In FIG. 9, the left side (FIG. 9(a)) is the corresponding coding tree block (CTB) partitioning for luma block and the right side (FIG. 9(b)) in the chroma CTB partitioning under dual tree. When determining the QP for chroma block, denoted by CU_c1, the center position of CU_c1 is firstly derived. Then the corresponding luma sample of the center position of CU_c1 is identified and luma QP associated with the luma CU that covers the corresponding luma sample, i.e., CU_Y3 is then utilized to derive the QP for CU_c1. However, when making filter decisions for the depicted three samples (with solid circles), the QPs of CUs that cover the corresponding 3 samples are selected. Therefore, for the 1^st, 2^ndand 3^rdchroma sample (depicted in FIG. 9 (b)), the QPs of CU_Y2, CU_Y3, CU_Y4 are utilized, respectivley. That is, chroma samples in the same CU may use different QPs for filter decision which may result in wrong decisions.
- 6. A different picture level QP offset (i.e., pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset) is applied to JCCR coded blocks which is different from the picture level offsets for Cb/Cr (e.g., pps_cb_qp_offset and pps_cr_qp_offset) applied to non-JCCR coded blocks. However, in the chroma deblocking filter decision process, only those offsets for non-JCCR coded blocks are utilized. The missing of consideration of coded modes may result in wrong filter decision.
- 7. The TS and non-TS coded blocks employ different QPs in the de-quantization process, which may be also considered in the deblocking process.
- 8. Different QPs are used in the scaling process (quantization/dequantization) for JCCR coded blocks with different modes. Such a design is not consistent.
- 9. The chroma deblocking for Cb/Cr could be unfied for parallel design.

4. Example Techniques and Embodiments

The detailed embodiments described below should be considered as examples to explain general concepts. These embodiments should not be interpreted narrowly way. Furthermore, these embodiments can be combined in any manner.

The methods described below may be also applicable to other decoder motion information derivation technologies in addition to the DMVR and BIO mentioned below.

In the following examples, MVM[i].x and MVM[i].y denote the horizontal and vertical component of the motion vector in reference picture list i (i being 0 or 1) of the block at M (M being P or Q) side. Abs denotes the operation to get the absolute value of an input, and “&&” and “∥” denotes the logical operation AND and OR. Referring to FIG. 10, P may denote the samples at P side and Q may denote the samples at Q side. The blocks at P side and Q side may denote the block marked by the dash lines.

Regarding Chroma OP in Deblocking

- 1. When chroma QP table is used to derive parameters to control chroma deblocking (e.g., in the decision process for chroma block edges), chroma QP offsets may be applied after applying chroma QP table.
  - a. In one example, the chroma QP offsets may be added to the value outputted by a chroma QP table.
  - b. Alternatively, the chroma QP offsets may be not considered as input to a chroma QP table.
  - c. In one example, the chroma QP offsets may be the picture-level or other video unit-level (slice/tile/brick/subpicture) chroma quantization parameter offset (e.g., pps_cb_qp_offset, pps_cr_qp_offset in the specification).
- 2. QP clipping may be not applied to the input of a chroma QP table.
- 3. It is proposed that deblocking process for chroma components may be based on the mapped chroma QP (by the chroma QP table) on each side.
  - a. In one example, it is proposed that deblocking parameters, (e.g., β and tC) for chroma may be based on QP derived from luma QP on each side.
  - b. In one example, the chroma deblocking parameter may depend on chroma QP table value with QpP as the table index, where QpP, is the luma QP value on P-side.
  - c. In one example, the chroma deblocking parameter may depend on chroma QP table value with QpQ as the table index, where QpQ, is the luma QP value on Q-side.
- 4. It is proposed that deblocking process for chroma components may be based on the QP applied to quantization/dequantization for the chroma block.
  - a. In one example, QP for deblocking process may be equal to the QP in dequantization.
- 5. It is proposed to consider the picture/slice/tile/brick/subpicture level quantization parameter offsets used for different coding methods in the deblocking filter decision process.
  - a. In one example, selection of picture/slice/tile/brick/subpicture level quantization parameter offsets for filter decision (e.g., the chroma edge decision in the deblocking filter process) may depend on the coded methods for each side.
  - b. In one example, the filtering process (e.g., the chroma edge decision process) which requires to use the quantization parameters for chroma blocks may depend on whether the blocks use JCCR.
    - i. Alternatively, furthermore, the picture/slice-level QP offsets (e.g., pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset) applied to JCCR coded blocks may be further taken into consideration in the deblocking filtering process.
    - ii. In one example, the cQpPicOffset which is used to decide Tc and β settings may be set to pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset instead of pps_cb_qp_offset or pps_cr_qp_offset under certain conditions:
      - 1. In one example, when either block in P or Q sides uses JCCR.
      - 2. In one example, when both blocks in P or Q sides uses JCCR.
- 6. The chroma filtering process (e.g., the chroma edge decision process) which requires to access the decoded information of a luma block may utilize the information associated with the same luma coding block that is used to derive the chroma QP in the dequantization/quantization process.
  - a. In one example, the chroma filtering process (e.g., the chroma edge decision process) which requires to use the quantization parameters for luma blocks may utilize the luma coding unit covering the corresponding luma sample of the center position of current chroma CU.
  - b. An example is depicted in FIG. 9 wherein the decoded information of CU_Y3 may be used for filtering decision of the three chroma samples (1^st, 2^ndand 3^rd) in FIG. 9 (b).
- 7. The chroma filtering process (e.g., the chroma edge decision process) may depend on the quantization parameter applied to the scaling process of the chroma block (e.g., quantization/dequantization).
  - a. In one example, the QP used to derive β and Tc may depend on the QP applied to the scaling process of the chroma block.
  - b. Alternatively, furthermore, the QP used to the scaling process of the chroma block may have taken the chroma CU level QP offset into consideration.
- 8. Whether to invoke above bullets may depend on the sample to be filtered is in the block at P or Q side.
  - a. For example, whether to use the information of the luma coding block covering the corresponding luma sample of current chroma sample or use the information of the luma coding block covering the corresponding luma sample of center position of chroma coding block covering current chroma sample may depend on the block position.
    - i. In one example, if the current chroma sample is in the block at the Q side, QP information of the luma coding block covering the corresponding luma sample of center position of chroma coding block covering current chroma sample may be used.
    - ii. In one example, if the current chroma sample is in the block at the P side, QP information of the luma coding block covering the corresponding luma sample of the chroma sample may be used.
      
      Regarding QP Settings
- 9. It is proposed to signal the indication of enabling block-level chroma QP offset (e.g. slice_cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag) at the slice/tile/brick/subpicture level.
  - a. Alternatively, the signaling of such an indication may be conditionally signaled.
    - i. In one example, it may be signaled under the condition of JCCR enabling flag.
    - ii. In one example, it may be signaled under the condition of block-level chroma QP offset enabling flag in picture level.
    - iii. Alternatively, such an indication may be derived instead.
  - b. In one example, the slice_cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag may be signaled only when the PPS flag of chroma QP offset (e.g.
    - slice_cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag) is true.
  - c. In one example, the slice_cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag may be inferred to false only when the PPS flag of chroma QP offset (e.g.
    - slice_cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag) is false.
  - d. In one example, whether to use the chroma QP offset on a block may be based on the flags of chroma QP offset at PPS level and/or slice level.
- 10. Same QP derivation method is used in the scaling process (quantization/dequantization) for JCCR coded blocks with different modes.
  - a. In one example, for JCCR with mode 1 and 3, the QP is dependent on the QP offset signaled in the picture/slice level (e.g., pps_cbcr_qp_offset, slice_cbcr_qp_offset).
    
    Filtering Procedures
- 11. Deblocking for all color components excepts for the first color component may follow the deblocking process for the first color component.
  - a. In one example, when the color format is 4:4:4, deblocking process for the second and third components may follow the deblocking process for the first component.
  - b. In one example, when the color format is 4:4:4 in red green blue (RGB) color space, deblocking process for the second and third components may follow the deblocking process for the first component.
  - c. In one example, when the color format is 4:2:2, vertical deblocking process for the second and third components may follow the vertical deblocking process for the first component.
  - d. In above examples, the deblocking process may refer to deblocking decision process and/or deblocking filtering process.
- 12. How to calculate gradient used in the deblocking filter process may depend on the coded mode information and/or quantization parameters.
  - a. In one example, the gradient computation may only consider the gradient of a side wherein the samples at that side are not lossless coded.
  - b. In one example, if both sides are lossless coded or nearly lossless coded (e.g., quantization parameters equal to 4), gradient may be directly set to 0.
    - i. Alternatively, if both sides are lossless coded or nearly lossless coded (e.g., quantization parameters equal to 4), Boundary Strength (e.g., BS) may be set to 0.
  - c. In one example, if the samples at P side are lossless coded and the samples at Q side are lossy coded, the gradients used in deblocking on/off decision and/or strong filters on/off decision may only include gradients of the samples at Q side, vice versa.
    - i. Alternatively, furthermore, the gradient of one side may be scaled by N.
      - 1. N is an integer number (e.g. 2) and may depend on
      - a. Video contents (e.g. screen contents or natural contents)
      - b. A message signaled in the DPS/SPS/VPS/PPS/APS/picture header/slice header/tile group header/Largest coding unit (LCU)/Coding unit (CU)/LCU row/group of LCUs/transform unit (TU)/prediction unit (PU) block/Video coding unit
      - c. Position of CU/PU/TU/block/Video coding unit
      - d. Coded modes of blocks containing the samples along the edges
      - e. Transform matrices applied to the blocks containing the samples along the edges
      - f. Block dimension/Block shape of current block and/or its neighboring blocks
      - g. Indication of the color format (such as 4:2:0, 4:4:4, RGB or YUV)
      - h. Coding tree structure (such as dual tree or single tree)
      - i. Slice/tile group type and/or picture type
      - j. Color component (e.g. may be only applied on Cb or Cr)
      - k. Temporal layer ID
      - l. Profiles/Levels/Tiers of a standard
      - m. Alternatively, N may be signalled to the decoder
        
        Regarding Boundary Strength Derivation
- 13. It is proposed to treat JCCR coded blocks as those non-JCCR coded blocks in the boundary strength decision process.
  - a. In one example, the determination of boundary strength (BS) may be independent from the checking of usage of JCCR for two blocks at P and Q sides.
  - b. In one example, the boundary strength (BS) for a block may be determined regardless if the block is coded with JCCR or not.
- 14. It is proposed to derive the boundary strength (BS) without comparing the reference pictures and/or number of MVs associated with the block at P side with the reference pictures of the block at Q side.
  - a. In one example, deblocking filter may be disabled even when two blocks are with different reference pictures.
  - b. In one example, deblocking filter may be disabled even when two blocks are with different number of MVs (e.g., one is uni-predicted and the other is bi-predicted).
  - c. In one example, the value of BS may be set to 1 when motion vector differences for one or all reference picture lists between the blocks at P side and Q side is larger than or equal to a threshold Th.
    - i. Alternatively, furthermore, the value of BS may be set to 0 when motion vector differences for one or all reference picture lists between the blocks at P side and Q side is smaller than or equal to a threshold Th.
  - d. In one example, the difference of the motion vectors of two blocks being larger than a threshold Th may be defined as (Abs(MVP[0].x−MVQ[0].x)>Th∥Abs(MVP[0].y−MVQ[0].y)>Th∥ Abs(MVP[1].x−MVQ[1].x)>Th)∥ Abs(MVP[1].y−MVQ[1].y)>Th)
    - ii. Alternatively, the difference of the motion vectors of two blocks being larger than a threshold Th may be defined as (Abs(MVP[0].x−MVQ[0].x)>Th && Abs(MVP[0].y-MVQ[0].y)>Th && Abs(MVP[1].x-MVQ[1].x)>Th) && Abs(MVP[1].y-MVQ[1].y)>Th)
    - iii. Alternatively, in one example, the difference of the motion vectors of two blocks being larger than a threshold Th may be defined as (Abs(MVP[0].x-MVQ[0].x)>Th∥ Abs(MVP[0].y-MVQ[0].y)>Th) && (Abs(MVP[1].x-MVQ[1].x)>Th)∥ Abs(MVP[1].y-MVQ[1].y)>Th)
    - iv. Alternatively, in one example, the difference of the motion vectors of two blocks being larger than a threshold Th may be defined as (Abs(MVP[0].x-MVQ[0].x)>Th && Abs(MVP[0].y-MVQ[0].y)>Th)∥(Abs(MVP[1].x-MVQ[1].x)>Th) && Abs(MVP[1].y-MVQ[1].y)>Th)
  - e. In one example, a block which does not have a motion vector in a given list may be treated as having a zero-motion vector in that list.
  - f. In the above examples, Th is an integer number (e.g. 4, 8 or 16).
  - g. In the above examples, Th may depend on
    - v. Video contents (e.g. screen contents or natural contents)
    - vi. A message signaled in the DPS/SPS/VPS/PPS/APS/picture header/slice header/tile group header/Largest coding unit (LCU)/Coding unit (CU)/LCU row/group of LCUs/TU/PU block/Video coding unit
    - vii. Position of CU/PU/TU/block/Video coding unit
    - viii. Coded modes of blocks containing the samples along the edges
    - ix. Transform matrices applied to the blocks containing the samples along the edges
    - x. Block dimension/Block shape of current block and/or its neighboring blocks
    - xi. Indication of the color format (such as 4:2:0, 4:4:4, RGB or YUV)
    - xii. Coding tree structure (such as dual tree or single tree)
    - xiii. Slice/tile group type and/or picture type
    - xiv. Color component (e.g. may be only applied on Cb or Cr)
    - xv. Temporal layer ID
    - xvi. Profiles/Levels/Tiers of a standard
    - xvii. Alternatively, Th may be signalled to the decoder.
  - h. The above examples may be applied under certain conditions.
    - xviii. In one example, the condition is the blkP and blkQ are not coded with intra modes.
    - xix. In one example, the condition is the blkP and blkQ have zero coefficients on luma component.
    - xx. In one example, the condition is the blkP and blkQ are not coded with the CIIP mode.
    - xxi. In one example, the condition is the blkP and blkQ are coded with a same prediction mode (e.g. IBC or Inter).
      
      Regarding Luma Deblocking Filtering Process
- 15. The deblocking may use different QPs for TS coded blocks and non-TS coded blocks.
  - a. In one example, the QP for TS may be used on TS coded blocks while the QP for non-TS may be used on non-TS coded blocks.
- 16. The luma filtering process (e.g., the luma edge decision process) may depend on the quantization parameter applied to the scaling process of the luma block.
  - a. In one example, the QP used to derive beta and Tc may depend on the clipping range of transform skip, e.g. as indicated by QpPrimeTsMin.
- 17. It is proposed to use an identical gradient computation for large block boundaries and smaller block boundaries.
  - a. In one example, the deblocking filter on/off decision described in section 2.1.4 may be also applied for large block boundary.
    - i. In one example, the threshold beta in the decision may be modified for large block boundary.
      - 1. In one example, beta may depend on quantization parameter.
      - 2. In one example, beta used for deblocking filter on/off decision for large block boundaries may be smaller than that for smaller block boundaries.
      - a. Alternatively, in one example, beta used for deblocking filter on/off decision for large block boundaries may be larger than that for smaller block boundaries.
      - b. Alternatively, in one example, beta used for deblocking filter on/off decision for large block boundaries may be equal to that for smaller block boundaries.
      - 3. In one example, beta is an integer number and may be based on
      - a. Video contents (e.g. screen contents or natural contents)
      - b. A message signaled in the DPS/SPS/VPS/PPS/APS/picture header/slice header/tile group header/Largest coding unit (LCU)/Coding unit (CU)/LCU row/group of LCUs/TU/PU block/Video coding unit
      - c. Position of CU/PU/TU/block/Video coding unit
      - d. Coded modes of blocks containing the samples along the edges
      - e. Transform matrices applied to the blocks containing the samples along the edges
      - f. Block dimension of current block and/or its neighboring blocks
      - g. Block shape of current block and/or its neighboring blocks
      - h. Indication of the color format (such as 4:2:0, 4:4:4, RGB or YUV)
      - i. Coding tree structure (such as dual tree or single tree)
      - j. Slice/tile group type and/or picture type
      - k. Color component (e.g. may be only applied on Cb or Cr)
      - l. Temporal layer ID
      - m. Profiles/Levels/Tiers of a standard
      - n. Alternatively, beta may be signalled to the decoder.
        
        Regarding Scaling Matrix (Dequantization Matrix)
- 18. The values for specific positions of quantization matrices may be set to constant.
  - a. In one example, the position may be the position of (x, y) wherein x and y are two integer variables (e.g., x=y=0), and (x, y) is the coordinate relative to a TU/transform block (TB)/PU/prediction block (PB)/CU/coding block (CB).
    - i. In one example, the position may be the position of direct current (DC).
  - b. In one example, the constant value may be 16.
  - c. In one example, for those positions, signaling of the matrix values may not be utilized.
- 19. A constrain may be set that the average/weighted average of some positions of quantization matrices may be a constant.
  - a. In one example, deblocking process may depend on the constant value.
  - b. In one example, the constant value may be indicated in DPS/VPS/SPS/PPS/Slice/Picture/Tile/Brick headers.
- 20. One or multiple indications may be signaled in the picture header to inform the scaling matrix to be selected in the picture associated with the picture header.
  
  Regarding Cross Component Adaptive Loop Filter (CCALF)
- 21. CCALF may be applied before some loop filtering process at the decoder
  - a. In one example, CCALF may be applied before deblocking process at the decoder.
  - b. In one example, CCALF may be applied before sample adaptive offset (SAO) at the decoder.
  - c. In one example, CCALF may be applied before ALF at the decoder.
  - d. Alternatively, the order of different filters (e.g., CCALF, ALF, SAO, deblocking filter) may be NOT fixed.
    - i. In one example, the invoke of CCLAF may be before one filtering process for one video unit or after another one for another video unit.
    - ii. In one example, the video unit may be a CTU/CTB/slice/tile/brick/picture/sequence.
  - e. Alternatively, indications of the order of different filters (e.g., CCALF, ALF, SAO, deblocking filter) may be signaled or derived on-the-fly.
    - i. Alternatively, indication of the invoking of CCALF may be signaled or derived on-the-fly.
  - f. The explicit (e.g. signaling from the encoder to the decoder) or implicit (e.g. derived at both encoder and decoder) indications of how to control CCALF may be decoupled for different color components (such as Cb and Cr).
  - g. Whether and/or how to apply CCALF may depend on color formats (such as RGB and YCbCr) and/or color sampling format (such as 4:2:0, 4:2:2 and 4:4:4), and/or color down-sampling positions or phases)
    
    Regarding Chroma OP Offset Lists
- 22. Signaling and/or selection of chroma QP offset lists may be dependent on the coded prediction modes/picture types/slice or tile or brick types.
  - h. Chroma QP offset lists, e.g. cb_qp_offset_list[i], cr_qp_offset_list[i], and joint_cbcr_qp_offset_list[i], may be different for different coding modes.
  - i. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in intra mode.
  - j. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in inter mode.
  - k. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in palette mode.
  - l. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in IBC mode.
  - m. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in transform skip mode.
  - n. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in BDPCM mode.
  - o. In one example, whether and how to apply chroma QP offset lists may depend on whether the current block is coded in transform_quant_skip or lossless mode.
    
    Regarding Chroma Deblocking at CTU Boundary
- 23. How to select the QPs (e.g., using corresponding luma or chroma dequantized QP) utilized in the deblocking filter process may be dependent on the position of samples relative to the CTU/CTB/virtual pipeline data unit (VPDU) boundaries.
- 24. How to select the QPs (e.g., using corresponding luma or chroma dequantized QP) utilized in the deblocking filter process may depend on color formats (such as RGB and YCbCr) and/or color sampling format (such as 4:2:0, 4:2:2 and 4:4:4), and/or color down-sampling positions or phases).
- 25. For edges at CTU boundary, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks.
  - p. In one example, for horizontal edges at CTU boundary, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks.
    - i. In one example, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks at P-side.
    - ii. In one example, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks at Q-side.
  - q. In one example, for vertical edges at CTU boundary, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks.
    - i. In one example, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks at P-side.
    - ii. In one example, the deblocking may be based on luma QP of the corresponding blocks at Q-side.
  - r. In one example, for edges at CTU boundary, the deblocking may be based on luma QP at P-side and chroma QP at Q-side.
  - s. In one example, for edges at CTU boundary, the deblocking may be based on luma QP at Q-side and chroma QP at P-side.
  - t. In this bullet, “CTU boundary” may refer to a specific CTU boundary such as the upper CTU boundary or the lower CTU boundary.
- 26. For horizontal edges at CTU boundary, the deblocking may be based on a function of chroma QPs at P-side.
  - u. In one example, the deblocking may be based on an averaging function of chroma QPs at P-side.
    - i. In one example, the function may be based on the average of the chroma QPs for each 8 luma samples.
    - ii. In one example, the function may be based on the average of the chroma QPs for each 16 luma samples.
    - iii. In one example, the function may be based on the average of the chroma QPs for each 32 luma samples.
    - iv. In one example, the function may be based on the average of the chroma QPs for each 64 luma samples.
    - v. In one example, the function may be based on the average of the chroma QPs for each CTU.
  - v. In one example, the deblocking may be based on a maximum function of chroma QPs at P-side.
    - i. In one example, the function may be based on the maximum of the chroma QPs for each 8 luma samples.
    - ii. In one example, the function may be based on the maximum of the chroma QPs for each 16 luma samples.
    - iii. In one example, the function may be based on the maximum of the chroma QPs for each 32 luma samples.
    - iv. In one example, the function may be based on the maximum of the chroma QPs for each 64 luma samples.
    - v. In one example, the function may be based on the maximum of the chroma QPs for each CTU.
  - w. In one example, the deblocking may be based on a minimum function of chroma QPs at P-side.
    - i. In one example, the function may be based on the minimum of the chroma QPs for each 8 luma samples.
    - ii. In one example, the function may be based on the minimum of the chroma QPs for each 16 luma samples.
    - iii. In one example, the function may be based on the minimum of the chroma QPs for each 32 luma samples.
    - iv. In one example, the function may be based on the minimum of the chroma QPs for each 64 luma samples.
    - v. In one example, the function may be based on the minimum of the chroma QPs for each CTU.
  - x. In one example, the deblocking may be based on a subsampling function of chroma QPs at P-side.
    - i. In one example, the function may be based on the chroma QPs of the k-th chroma sample for each 8 luma samples.
      - 1. In one example, the k-th sample may be the first sample.
      - 2. In one example, the k-th sample may be the last sample.
      - 3. In one example, the k-th sample may be the third sample.
      - 4. In one example, the k-th sample may be the fourth sample.
    - ii. In one example, the function may be based on the chroma QPs of the k-th chroma sample for each 16 luma samples.
      - 1. In one example, the k-th sample may be the first sample.
      - 2. In one example, the k-th sample may be the last sample.
      - 3. In one example, the k-th sample may be the 7-th sample.
      - 4. In one example, the k-th sample may be the 8-th sample.
    - iii. In one example, the function may be based on the chroma QPs of the k-th chroma sample for each 32 luma samples.
      - 1. In one example, the k-th sample may be the first sample.
      - 2. In one example, the k-th sample may be the last sample.
      - 3. In one example, the k-th sample may be the 15-th sample.
      - 4. In one example, the k-th sample may be the 16-th sample.
    - iv. In one example, the function may be based on the chroma QPs of the k-th chroma sample for each 64 luma samples.
      - 1. In one example, the k-th sample may be the first sample.
      - 2. In one example, the k-th sample may be the last sample.
      - 3. In one example, the k-th sample may be the 31-th sample.
      - 4. In one example, the k-th sample may be the 32-th sample.
    - v. In one example, the function may be based on the chroma QPs of the k-th chroma sample for each CTU.
  - y. Alternatively, the above items may be applied to chroma QPs at Q-side for deblocking process.
- 27. It may be constrained that QP for chroma component may be the same for a chroma row segment with length 4*m starting from (4*m*x, 2y) relative to top-left of the picture, where x and y are non-negative integers; and m is a positive integer.
  - z. In one example, m may be equal to 1.
  - aa. In one example, the width of a quantization group for chroma component must be no smaller than 4*m.
- 28. It may be constrained that QP for chroma component may be the same for a chroma column segment with length 4*n starting from (2*x, 4*n*y) relative to top-left of the picture, where x and y are non-negative integers; and n is a positive integer.
  - bb. In one example, n may be equal to 1.
  - cc. In one example, the height of a quantization group for chroma component must be no smaller than 4*n.
    
    Regarding Chroma Deblocking Filtering Process
- 29. A first syntax element controlling the usage of coding tool X may be signalled in a first video unit (such as picture header), depending on a second syntax element signalled in a second video unit (such as SPS or PPS, or VPS).
  - a. In one example, the first syntax element is signalled only if the second syntax element indicates that the coding tool X is enabled.
  - b. In one example, X is Bi-Direction Optical Flow (BDOF).
  - c. In one example, X is Prediction Refinement Optical Flow (PROF).
  - d. In one example, X is Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement (DMVR).
  - e. In one example, the signalling of the usage of a coding tool X may be under the condition check of slice types (e.g., P or B slices; non-I slices).
    
    Regarding Chroma Deblocking Filtering Process
- 30. Deblocking filter decision processes for two chroma blocks may be unified to be only invoked once and the decision is applied to two chroma blocks.
  - a. In one example, the decision for whether to perform deblocking filter may be same for Cb and Cr components.
  - b. In one example, if the deblocking filter is determined to be applied, the decision for whether to perform stronger deblocking filter may be same for Cb and Cr components.
  - c. In one example, the deblocking condition and strong filter on/off condition, as described in section 2.2.7, may be only checked once. However, it may be modified to check the information of both chroma components.
    - i. In one example, the average of gradients of Cb and Cr components may be used in the above decisions for both Cb and Cr components.
    - ii. In one example, the chroma stronger filters may be performed only when the strong filter condition is satisfied for both Cb and Cr components.
      - 1. Alternatively, in one example, the chroma weak filters may be performed only when the strong filter condition is not satisfied at least one chroma component
        
        General
- 31. The above proposed methods may be applied under certain conditions.
  - a. In one example, the condition is the colour format is 4:2:0 and/or 4:2:2.
    - i. Alternatively, furthermore, for 4:4:4 colour format, how to apply deblocking filter to the two colour chroma components may follow the current design.
  - b. In one example, indication of usage of the above methods may be signalled in sequence/picture/slice/tile/brick/a video region-level, such as SPS/PPS/picture header/slice header.
  - c. In one example, the usage of above methods may depend on
    - ii. Video contents (e.g. screen contents or natural contents)
    - iii. A message signaled in the dependency parameter set (DPS)/sequence parameter set (SPS)/video parameter set (VPS)/picture parameter set (PPS)/APS/picture header/slice header/tile group header/Largest coding unit (LCU)/Coding unit (CU)/LCU row/group of LCUs/TU/PU block/Video coding unit
    - iv. Position of CU/PU/TU/block/Video coding unit
      - a. In one example, for filtering samples along the CTU/CTB boundaries (e.g., the first K (e.g., K=4/8) to the top/left/right/bottom boundaries), the existing design may be applied. While for other samples, the proposed method (e.g., bullets 3/4) may be applied instead.
    - v. Coded modes of blocks containing the samples along the edges
    - vi. Transform matrices applied to the blocks containing the samples along the edges
    - vii. Block dimension of current block and/or its neighboring blocks
    - viii. Block shape of current block and/or its neighboring blocks
    - ix. Indication of the color format (such as 4:2:0, 4:4:4, RGB or YUV)
    - x. Coding tree structure (such as dual tree or single tree)
    - xi. Slice/tile group type and/or picture type
    - xii. Color component (e.g. may be only applied on Cb or Cr)
    - xiii. Temporal layer ID
    - xiv. Profiles/Levels/Tiers of a standard
    - xv. Alternatively, m and/or n may be signalled to the decoder.

5. Additional Embodiments

The newly added texts are shown in underlined bold italicized font. The deleted texts are marked by [[ ]].

5.1. Embodiment #1 on Chroma QP in Deblocking

8.8.3.6 Edge Filtering Process for One Direction

- Otherwise (cIdx is not equal to 0), the filtering process for edges in the chroma coding block of current coding unit specified by cIdx consists of the following ordered steps:
  - 1. The variable cQpPicOffset is derived as follows:
    
    cQpPicOffset=cIdx==1?pps_cb_qp_offset: pps_cr_qp_offset (8-1065)
    
    8.8.3.6.3 Decision Process for Chroma Block Edges
    
    The variables Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the Qp_Yvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.
    
    The variable Qpc is derived as follows:
    
    [[qPi=Clip3(0,63,((Qp_Q+Qp_P+1)>>1)+cQpPicOffset) (8-1132)
    Qp_C=ChromaQpTable[cIdx−1][qPi] (8-1133)]]
    qPi=(Qp_Q+Qp_P+1)>>1 (8-1132)
    Qp_C=ChromaQpTable[cIdx−1][qPi]+cQpPicOffset (8-1133)
- NOTE—The variable cQpPicOffset provides an adjustment for the value of pps_cb_qp_offset or pps_cr_qp_offset, according to whether the filtered chroma component is the Cb or Cr component. However, to avoid the need to vary the amount of the adjustment within the picture, the filtering process does not include an adjustment for the value of slice_cb_qp_offset or slice_cr_qp_offset nor (when cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag is equal to 1) for the value of CuQpOffset_Cb, CuQpOffset_Cr, or CuQpOffset_CbCr.
  
  The value of the variable β′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,63,Qpc+(slice_beta_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1134)
  
  where slice_beta_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_beta_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0.
  
  The variable β is derived as follows:
  
  β=β′*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1135)
  
  The value of the variable t_C′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the chroma quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,65,Qp_C+2*(bS−1)+(slice_tc_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1136)
  
  where slice_tc_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_tc_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0. The variable t_Cis derived as follows:
  
  t_C=(BitDepth_C<10)?(t_C′+2)>>(10−BitDepth_C): t_C′*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1137)

5.2. Embodiment #2 on Boundary Strength Derivation

8.8.3.5 Derivation Process of Boundary Filtering Strength

Inputs to this process are:

- a picture sample array recPicture,
- a location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current coding block relative to the top-left sample of the current picture,
- a variable nCbW specifying the width of the current coding block,
- a variable nCbH specifying the height of the current coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour component of the current coding block,
- a two-dimensional (nCbW)×(nCbH) array edgeFlags.
  
  Output of this process is a two-dimensional (nCbW)×(nCbH) array bS specifying the boundary filtering strength.
  
  For xD_iwith i=0 . . . xN and yD_jwith j=0 . . . yN, the following applies:
- If edgeFlags[xD_i][yD_j] is equal to 0, the variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.
- Otherwise, the following applies:
  - The variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is derived as follows:
    - If cIdx is equal to 0 and both samples p₀and q₀are in a coding block with intra_bdpcm_flag equal to 1, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.
    - Otherwise, if the sample p₀or q₀is in the coding block of a coding unit coded with intra prediction mode, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 2.
    - Otherwise, if the block edge is also a transform block edge and the sample p₀or q₀is in a coding block with ciip_flag equal to 1, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 2.
    - Otherwise, if the block edge is also a transform block edge and the sample p₀or q₀is in a transform block which contains one or more non-zero transform coefficient levels, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1.
    - Otherwise, if the block edge is also a transform block edge, cIdx is greater than 0, and the sample p₀or q₀is in a transform unit with tu_joint_cbcr_residual_flag equal to 1, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1.
    - Otherwise, if the prediction mode of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀is different from the prediction mode of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀(i.e. one of the coding subblock is coded in IBC prediction mode and the other is coded in inter prediction mode), bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1.
    - Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 0 and one or more of the following conditions are true, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1:
      - The absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of list 0 motion vectors used in the Prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in 1/16 luma samples, or the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the list 1 motion vectors used in the Prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - [[The coding subblock containing the sample p₀and the coding subblock containing the sample q₀are both coded in IBC prediction mode, and the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the block vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - For the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀different reference pictures or a different number of motion vectors are used than for the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀.
      - NOTE 1—The determination of whether the reference pictures used for the two coding sublocks are the same or different is based only on which pictures are referenced, without regard to whether a prediction is formed using an index into reference picture list 0 or an index into reference picture list 1, and also without regard to whether the index position within a reference picture list is different.
      - NOTE 2—The number of motion vectors that are used for the prediction of a coding subblock with top-left sample covering (xSb, ySb), is equal to PredFlagL0[xSb][ySb]+PredFlagL1[xSb][ySb].
      - One motion vector is used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample p₀and one motion vector is used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample q₀, and the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the motion vectors used is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - Two motion vectors and two different reference pictures are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample p₀, two motion vectors for the same two reference pictures are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample q₀and the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the two motion vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks for the same reference picture is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - Two motion vectors for the same reference picture are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample p₀, two motion vectors for the same reference picture are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample q₀and both of the following conditions are true:
      - The absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of list 0 motion vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in 1/16 luma samples, or the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the list 1 motion vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - The absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of list 0 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀and the list 1 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples, or the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the list 1 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀and list 0 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.]]
    - Otherwise, the variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.

5.3. Embodiment #3 on Boundary Strength Derivation

8.8.3.5 Derivation Process of Boundary Filtering Strength

Inputs to this process are:

- a picture sample array recPicture,
- a location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current coding block relative to the top-left sample of the current picture,
- a variable nCbW specifying the width of the current coding block,
- a variable nCbH specifying the height of the current coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour component of the current coding block,
- a two-dimensional (nCbW)×(nCbH) array edgeFlags.

Output of this process is a two-dimensional (nCbW)×(nCbH) array bS specifying the boundary filtering strength.

For xD_iwith i=0 . . . xN and yD_jwith j=0 . . . yN, the following applies:

- If edgeFlags[xD_i][yD_j] is equal to 0, the variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.
- Otherwise, the following applies:
  - The variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is derived as follows:
    - If cIdx is equal to 0 and both samples p₀and q₀are in a coding block with intra_bdpcm_flag equal to 1, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.
    - Otherwise, if the sample p₀or q₀is in the coding block of a coding unit coded with intra prediction mode, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 2.
    - Otherwise, if the block edge is also a transform block edge and the sample p₀or q₀is in a coding block with ciip_flag equal to 1, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 2.
    - Otherwise, if the block edge is also a transform block edge and the sample p₀or q₀is in a transform block which contains one or more non-zero transform coefficient levels, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1.
    - [[Otherwise, if the block edge is also a transform block edge, cIdx is greater than 0, and the sample p₀or q₀is in a transform unit with tu_joint_cbcr_residual_flag equal to 1, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1.]]
    - Otherwise, if the prediction mode of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀is different from the prediction mode of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀(i.e. one of the coding subblock is coded in IBC prediction mode and the other is coded in inter prediction mode), bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1.
    - Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 0 and one or more of the following conditions are true, bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 1:
      - The coding subblock containing the sample p₀and the coding subblock containing the sample q₀are both coded in IBC prediction mode, and the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the block vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - For the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀different reference pictures or a different number of motion vectors are used than for the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀.
      - NOTE 1—The determination of whether the reference pictures used for the two coding sublocks are the same or different is based only on which pictures are referenced, without regard to whether a prediction is formed using an index into reference picture list 0 or an index into reference picture list 1, and also without regard to whether the index position within a reference picture list is different.
      - NOTE 2—The number of motion vectors that are used for the prediction of a coding subblock with top-left sample covering (xSb, ySb), is equal to PredFlagL0[xSb][ySb]+PredFlagL1[xSb][ySb].
      - One motion vector is used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample p₀and one motion vector is used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample q₀, and the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the motion vectors used is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - Two motion vectors and two different reference pictures are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample p₀, two motion vectors for the same two reference pictures are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample q₀and the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the two motion vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks for the same reference picture is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - Two motion vectors for the same reference picture are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample p₀, two motion vectors for the same reference picture are used to predict the coding subblock containing the sample q₀and both of the following conditions are true:
      - The absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of list 0 motion vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in 1/16 luma samples, or the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the list 1 motion vectors used in the prediction of the two coding subblocks is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
      - The absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of list 0 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀and the list 1 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples, or the absolute difference between the horizontal or vertical component of the list 1 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample p₀and list 0 motion vector used in the prediction of the coding subblock containing the sample q₀is greater than or equal to 8 in units of 1/16 luma samples.
    - Otherwise, the variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.

5.4. Embodiment #4 on Luma Deblocking Filtering Process

8.8.3.6.1 Decision Process for Luma Block Edges

Inputs to this process are:

- a picture sample array recPicture,
- a location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current coding block relative to the top-left sample of the current picture,
- a location (xBl, yBl) specifying the top-left sample of the current block relative to the top-left sample of the current coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable bS specifying the boundary filtering strength,
- a variable maxFilterLengthP specifying the max filter length,
- a variable maxFilterLengthQ specifying the max filter length.
  
  Outputs of this process are:
- the variables dE, dEp and dEq containing decisions,
- the modified filter length variables maxFilterLengthP and maxFilterLengthQ,
- the variable t_C.
  
  The following ordered steps apply:
- 1. When sidePisLargeBlk or sideQisLargeBlk is greater than 0, the following applies:
  - a. The variables dp0L, dp3L are derived and maxFilterLengthP is modified as follows:
    - [[If sidePisLargeBlk is equal to 1, the following applies:
      
      dp0L=(dp0+Abs(p_5,0−2*p_4,0+p_3,0)+1)>>1 (8-1087)
      dp3L=(dp3+Abs(p_5,3−2*p_4,3+p_3,3)+1)>>1 (8-1088)
    - Otherwise, the following applies:]]
      
      dp0L=dp0 (8-1089)
      dp3L=dp3 (8-1090)
      [[maxFilterLengthP=3(8-1091)]]
      maxFilterLengthP=sidePisLargeBlk?maxFilterLengthP: 3
  - b. The variables dq0L and dq3L are derived as follows:
    - [[If sideQisLargeBlk is equal to 1, the following applies:
      
      dq0L=(dq0+Abs(q_5,0−2*q_4,0+q_3,0)+1)>>1 (8-1092)
      dq3L=(dq3+Abs(q_5,3−2*q_4,3+q_3,3)+1)>>1 (8-1093)
    - Otherwise, the following applies:]]
      
      dq0L=dq0 (8-1094)
      dq3L=dq3 (8-1095)
      maxFilterLengthQ=sidePisLargeBlk?maxFilterLengthQ: 3
- 2. The variables dE, dEp and dEq are derived as follows:

5.5. Embodiment #5 on Chroma Deblocking Filtering Process

8.8.3.6.3 Decision Process for Chroma Block Edges

This process is only invoked when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0.

Inputs to this process are:

- a chroma picture sample array recPicture,
- a chroma location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block relative to the top-left chroma sample of the current picture,
- a chroma location (xBl, yBl) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma block relative to the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour component index,
- a variable cQpPicOffset specifying the picture-level chroma quantization parameter offset,
- a variable bS specifying the boundary filtering strength,
- a variable maxFilterLengthCbCr.
  
  Outputs of this process are
- the modified variable maxFilterLengthCbCr,
- the variable t_C.
  
  The variable maxK is derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubHeightC==1)?3:1 (8-1124)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubWidthC==1)?3:1 (8-1125)
  
  The values p_iand q_iwith i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr and k=0 . . . maxK are derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+i][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1126)
  p_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl−i−1][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1127)
  subSampleC=SubHeightC (8-1128)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl+i] (8-1129)
  p_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl−i−1] (8-1130)
  subSampleC=SubWidthC (8-1131)
  
  When ChromaArrayTvype is not equal to 0 and treeType is equal to SINGLE_TREE or DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the following applies:
- When treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the variable Qp_Yis set equal to the luma quantization parameter Qp_Yof the luma coding unit that covers the luma location (xCb+cbWidth/2, yCb+cbHeight/2).
- The variables qP_Cb, qP_Crand qP_CbCrare derived as follows:
  
  qPi_Chroma=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,Qp_Y) (8-935)
  qPi_Cb=ChromaQpTable[0][qPi_Chroma] (8-936)
  qPi_Cr=ChromaQpTable[1][qPi_Chroma] (8-937)
  qPi_CbCr=ChromaQpTable[2][qPi_Chroma] (8-938)
- The chroma quantization parameters for the Cb and Cr components, Qp′_Cband Qp′_Cr, and joint Cb-Cr coding Qp′_CbCrare derived as follows:
  
  QP′_Cb=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,qP_Cb+pps_cb_qp_offset+slice_cb_qp_offset+CuQpOffset_Cr) (8-939)
  QP′_Cr=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,qP_Cr+pps_cr_qp_offset+slice_cr_qp_offset+CuQpOffset_Cr) (8-940)
  Qp′_CbCr=Clip3(−QpBdOffset_C,63,qP_CbCr+pps_cbcr_qp_offset+slice_cbcr_qp_offset+CuQpOffset_CbCr) (8-941)
  
  The variables Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the corresponding Qp′_Cbor Qp′_Cror Qp′_CbCrvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.
  
  The variable Qp_Cis derived as follows:
  
  Qp_C=(Qp_Q+Qp_P+1)>>1 (8-1133)
  
  The value of the variable β′ is determined as specified in Table t-18 based on the quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,63,Qp_C+(slice_beta_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1134)
  
  where slice_beta_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_beta_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0.
  
  The variable β is derived as follows:
  
  β=β′*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1135)
  
  The value of the variable t_C′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the chroma quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,65,Qp_C+2*(bS−1)+(slice_tc_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1136)
  
  where slice_tc_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_tc_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0. The variable t_Cis derived as follows:
  
  t_C=(BitDepth_C<10)?(t_C′+2)>>(10−BitDepth_C): t_C′*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1137)
  
  When maxFilterLengthCbCr is equal to 1 and bS is not equal to 2, maxFilterLengthCbCr is set equal to 0.

5.6. Embodiment #6 on Chroma QP in Deblocking

8.8.3.6.3 Decision Process for Chroma Block Edges

This process is only invoked when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0.

Inputs to this process are:

- a chroma picture sample array recPicture,
- a chroma location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block relative to the top-left chroma sample of the current picture,
- a chroma location (xBl, yBl) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma block relative to the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour component index,
- a variable cQpPicOffset specifying the picture-level chroma quantization parameter offset,
- a variable bS specifying the boundary filtering strength,
- a variable maxFilterLengthCbCr.
  
  Outputs of this process are
- the modified variable maxFilterLengthCbCr,
- the variable t_C.
  
  The variable maxK is derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubHeightC==1)?3:1 (8-1124)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubWidthC==1)?3:1 (8-1125)
  
  The values p_iand q_iwith i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr and k=0 . . . maxK are derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+i][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1126)
  p_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl−i−1][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1127)
  subSampleC=SubHeightC (8-1128)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl+i] (8-1129)
  p_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl−i−1] (8-1130)
  subSampleC=SubWidthC (8-1131)
  
  The variables Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the Qp_Yvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.
  
  The variables jccr_flag_Pand jccr_flag_Oare set equal to the tu_joint_cbcr_residual_flag values of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.
  
  The variable Qp_Cis derived as follows:
  
  [[qPi=Clip3(0,63,((Qp_Q+Qp_P+1)>>1)+cQpPicOffset) (8-1132)]]
  qPi=Clip3(0,63,((Qp_O+(jccr_flag_P?pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset: cQpPicOffset)+Qp_P+(jccr_flag_O?pps_joint_cbcr_qp_offset: cQpPicOffset)+1)>>1))
  Qp_C=ChromaQpTable[cIdx−1][qPi] (8-1133)
- NOTE—The variable cQpPicOffset provides an adjustment for the value of pps_cb_qp_offset or pps_cr_qp_offset, according to whether the filtered chroma component is the Cb or Cr component. However, to avoid the need to vary the amount of the adjustment within the picture, the filtering process does not include an adjustment for the value of slice_cb_qp_offset or slice_cr_qp_offset nor (when cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag is equal to 1) for the value of CuQpOffset_Cb, CuQpOffset_Cr, or CuQpOffset_CbCr.

5.7. Embodiment #7 on Chroma QP in Deblocking

8.8.3.6.3 Decision Process for Chroma Block Edges

This process is only invoked when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0.

Inputs to this process are:

- a chroma picture sample array recPicture,
- a chroma location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block relative to the top-left chroma sample of the current picture,
  
  Outputs of this process are
- the modified variable maxFilterLengthCbCr,
- the variable t_C.
  
  The variable maxK is derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubHeightC==1)?3:1 (8-1124)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubWidthC==1)?3:1 (8-1125)
  
  The values p_iand q_iwith i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr and k=0 . . . maxK are derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+i][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1126)
  p_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl−i−1][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1127)
  subSampleC=SubHeightC (8-1128)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl+i] (8-1129)
  p_i,k=recPicture[xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl−i−1] (8-1130)
  subSampleC=SubWidthC (8-1131)
  
  [[The variables Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the Qp_Yvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.]]
  
  The variables Qp_Qis set equal to the luma quantization parameter Qp_Yof the luma coding unit that covers the luma location (xCb+cbWidth/2, yCb+cbHeight/2) wherein cbWidth specifies the width of the current chroma coding block in luma samples, and cbHeight specifies the height of the current chroma coding block in luma samples.
  
  The variables Qp_Pis set equal to the luma quantization Parameter Qp_Yof the luma coding unit that covers the luma location (xCb′+cbWidth′/2, yCb′+cbHeight′/2) wherein (xCb′, yCb′) the top-left sample of the chroma coding block covering q_0,0relative to the top-left chroma sample of the current picture, cbWidth′ specifies the width of the current chroma coding block in luma samples, and cbHeight specifies the height of the current chroma coding block in luma samples.
  
  The variable Qpc is derived as follows:
  
  qPi=Clip3(0,63,((Qp_Q+Qp_P+1)>>1)+cQpPicOffset) (8-1132)
  Qpc=ChromaQpTable[cIdx−1][qPi] (8-1133)
- NOTE—The variable cQpPicOffset provides an adjustment for the value of pps_cb_qp_offset or pps_cr_qp_offset, according to whether the filtered chroma component is the Cb or Cr component. However, to avoid the need to vary the amount of the adjustment within the picture, the filtering process does not include an adjustment for the value of slice_cb_qp_offset or slice_cr_qp_offset nor (when cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag is equal to 1) for the value of CuQpOffset_Cb, CuQpOffset_Cr, or CuQpOffset_CbCr.
  
  The value of the variable β′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,63,Qp_C+(slice_beta_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1134)
  
  where slice_beta_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_beta_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0.
  
  The variable β is derived as follows:
  
  β=β′*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1135)
  
  The value of the variable t_C′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the chroma quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,65,Qp_C+2*(bS−1)+(slice_tc_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1136)
  
  where slice_tc_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_tc_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0.

5.8. Embodiment #8 on Chroma QP in Deblocking

When making filter decisions for the depicted three samples (with solid circles), the QPs of the luma CU that covers the center position of the chroma CU including the three samples is selected. Therefore, for the 1^st, 2^ndand 3^rdchroma sample (depicted in FIG. 11), only the QP of CU_Y3 is utilized, respectively.

In this way, how to select luma CU for chroma quantization/dequantization process is algined with that for chroma filter decision process.

5.9. Embodiment #9 on QP Used for JCCR Coded Blocks

8.7.3 Scaling Process for Transform Coefficients

Inputs to this process are:

- a luma location (xTbY, yTbY) specifying the top-left sample of the current luma transform block relative to the top-left luma sample of the current picture,
- a variable nTbW specifying the transform block width,
- a variable nTbH specifying the transform block height,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour component of the current block,
- a variable bitDepth specifying the bit depth of the current colour component.
  
  Output of this process is the (nTbW)×(nTbH) array d of scaled transform coefficients with elements d[x][y]. The quantization parameter qP is derived as follows:
- If cIdx is equal to 0 and transform_skip_flag[xTbY][yTbY] is equal to 0, the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_Y (8-950)
- Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 0 (and transform_skip_flag[xTbY][yTbY] is equal to 1), the following applies:
  
  qP=Max(QpPrimeTsMin,Qp′_Y) (8-951)
- Otherwise, if TuCResMode[xTbY][yTbY] is unequal to 0 [[equal to 2]], the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_CbCr (8-952)
- Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 1, the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_Cb (8-953)
- Otherwise (cIdx is equal to 2), the following applies:
  
  qP=Qp′_Cr (8-954)

5.10 Embodiment #10 on QP Used for JCCR Coded Blocks

8.8.3.2 Deblocking Filter Process for One Direction

Inputs to this process are:

- the variable treeType specifying whether the luma (DUAL_TREE_LUMA) or chroma components (DUAL_TREE_CHROMA) are currently processed,
- when treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_LUMA, the reconstructed picture prior to deblocking, i.e., the array recPicture_L,
- when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0 and treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the arrays recPicture_Cband recPicture_Cr,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered.

Outputs of this process are the modified reconstructed picture after deblocking, i.e:

- when treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_LUMA, the array recPicture_L,
- when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0 and treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the arrays recPicture_Cband recPicture_Cr.

The variables firstCompIdx and lastCompIdx are derived as follows:

firstCompIdx=(treeType==DUAL_TREE_CHROMA)?1:0 (8-1022)
lastCompIdx=(treeType==DUAL_TREE_LUMA ChromaArrayType==0)?0:2 (8-1023)

For each coding unit and each coding block per colour component of a coding unit indicated by the colour component index cIdx ranging from firstCompIdx to lastCompIdx, inclusive, with coding block width nCbW, coding block height nCbH and location of top-left sample of the coding block (xCb, yCb), when cIdx is equal to 0, or when cIdx is not equal to 0 and edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER and xCb % 8 is equal 0, or when cIdx is not equal to 0 and edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR and yCb % 8 is equal to 0, the edges are filtered by the following ordered steps:

[[5. The picture sample array recPicture is derived as follows:

- If cIdx is equal to 0, recPicture is set equal to the reconstructed luma picture sample array prior to deblocking recPicture_L.
- Otherwise, if cIdx is equal to 1, recPicture is set equal to the reconstructed chroma picture sample array prior to deblocking recPicture_Cb.
- Otherwise (cIdx is equal to 2), recPicture is set equal to the reconstructed chroma picture sample array prior to deblocking recPicture_Cr]]
  
  5. The picture sample array recPicturefilwith i=0, 1, 2 is derived as follows:
- recPicture[0] is set equal to the reconstructed picture sample array prior to deblocking recPictureL.
- recPicture[1] is set equal to the reconstructed picture sample array prior to deblocking recPictureCb.
- recPicture[2] is set equal to the reconstructed picture sample array prior to deblocking recPictureCr
  
  if the cIdx is equal to 1, the following process are applied:
- The edge filtering process for one direction is invoked for a coding block as specified in clause 8.8.3.6 with the variable edgeType, the variable cIdx, the reconstructed picture prior to deblocking recPicture, the location (xCb, yCb), the coding block width nCbW, the coding block height nCbH, and the arrays bS, maxFilterLengthPs, and maxFilterLengthQs, as inputs, and the modified reconstructed picture recPicture as output.
  
  8.8.3.5 Derivation Process of Boundary Filtering Strength
  
  Inputs to this process are:
- a picture sample array recPicture,
- a location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current coding block relative to the top-left sample of the current picture,
- a variable nCbW specifying the width of the current coding block,
- a variable nCbH specifying the height of the current coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable cIdx specifying the colour componentof the current coding block,
- a two-dimensional (nCbW)×(nCbH) array edgeFlags.
  
  Output of this process is a two-dimensional (nCbW)×(nCbH) array bS specifying the boundary filtering strength. The variables xD_i, yD_j, xN and yN are derived as follows:
  
  For xD_iwith i=0 . . . xN and yD, with j=0 . . . yN, the following applies:
- If edgeFlags[xD_i][yD_j] is equal to 0, the variable bS[xD_i][yD_j] is set equal to 0.
- Otherwise, the following applies:
  - The sample values p₀and q₀are derived as follows:
    - If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, p₀is set equal to recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xD_i−1][yCb+yD_j] and q₀is set equal to recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xD_i][yCb+yD_j].
    - Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), p₀is set equal to recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xD_i][yCb+yD, −1] and q₀is set equal to recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xD_i][yCb+yD_j].
      
      8.8.3.6 Edge Filtering Process for One Direction
      
      Inputs to this process are:
- a variable edgeType specifying whether vertical edges (EDGE_VER) or horizontal edges (EDGE_HOR) are currently processed,
- a variable cIdx specifying the current colour component,
- the reconstructed picture prior to deblocking recPicture,
- a location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current coding block relative to the top-left sample of the current picture,
- a variable nCbW specifying the width of the current coding block,
- a variable nCbH specifying the height of the current coding block,
- the array bS specifying the boundary strength,
- the arrays maxFilterLengthPs and maxFilterLengthQs.
  
  Output of this process is the modified reconstructed picture after deblocking recPicturej.

Otherwise (cIdx is not equal to 0), the filtering process for edges in the chroma coding block of current coding unit specified by cIdx consists of the following ordered steps:

- 1. The variable cQpPicOffset is derived as follows:
  
  cQpPicOffset=cIdx==1 ?pps_cb_qp_offset: pps_cr_qp_offset (8-1065)
  cQpPicOffset=(pps_cb_qp_offset+pps_cr_qp_offset+1)>>1 (8-1065)
- 2. bS[xDk][yDm] for cIdx=1 and 2 are modified to 1 if bS[xDk][yDm] for cIdx=1 is equal to 1 or bS[xDk][yDm] for cIdx=2 is equal to 1.
- 3. The decision process for chroma block edges as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.3 is invoked with the chroma picture sample array recPicture, the location of the chroma coding block (xCb, yCb), the location of the chroma block (xBl, yBl) set equal to (xD_k, yD_m), the edge direction edgeType, the variable cQpPicOffset, the boundary filtering strength bS[xD_k][yD_m], and the variable maxFilterLengthCbCr set equal to maxFilterLengthPs[xD_k][yD_m] as inputs, and the modified variable maxFilterLengthCbCr, and the variable t_Cas outputs.
- 4. When maxFilterLengthCbCr is greater than 0, the filtering process for chroma block edges as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.4 is invoked with the chroma picture sample array recPicture, the location of the chroma coding block (xCb, yCb), the chroma location of the block (xBl, yBl) set equal to (xD_k, yD_m), the edge direction edgeType, the variable maxFilterLengthCbCr, and the cIdx euqal to 1 as input, and the variable t_Cas inputs, and the modified chroma picture sample array recPicture as output.
  - When maxFilterLengthCbCr is greater than 0, the filtering process for chroma block edges as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.4 is invoked with the chroma picture sample array recPicture, the location of the chroma coding block (xCb, yCb), the chroma location of the block (xBl, VBl) set equal to (xDk, yDm), the edge direction edgeType, the variable maxFilterLengthCbCr, and the cIdx euqal to 2 as input, and the variable tC as inputs, and the modified chroma picture sample array recPicture as output.
    
    8.8.3.6.3 Decision Process for Chroma Block Edges
    
    This process is only invoked when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0.
    
    Inputs to this process are:
- a chroma picture sample array recPicture,
- a chroma location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block relative to the top-left chroma sample of the current picture,
- a chroma location (xBl, yBl) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma block relative to the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- [[a variable cIdx specifying the colour component index,]]
- a variable cQpPicOffset specifying the picture-level chroma quantization parameter offset,
- a variable bS specifying the boundary filtering strength,
- a variable maxFilterLengthCbCr.
  
  Outputs of this process are
- the modified variable maxFilterLengthCbCr,
- the variable t_C.
  
  The variable maxK is derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubHeightC==1)?3:1 (8-1124)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  maxK=(SubWidthC==1)?3:1 (8-1125)
  
  The values p_iand q_iwith c=0 . . . 1, i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr and k=0 . . . maxK are derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  q c,_i,k=recPicture[c][xCb+xBl+i][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1126)
  p_c,_i,k=recPicture[c][xCb+xBl−i−1][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1127)
  subSampleC=SubHeightC (8-1128)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  q c_i,k=recPicture[c][xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl+i] (8-1129)
  p c,_i,k=recPicture[c][xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl−i−1] (8-1130)
  subSampleC=SubWidthC (8-1131)
  
  The variables Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the Qp_Yvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.
  
  The variable Qpc is derived as follows:
  
  qPi=Clip3(0,63,((Qp_Q+Qp_p+1)>>1)+cQpPicOffset) (8-1132)
  QpC=ChromaQpTable[cIdx−1][qPi]+cQpPicOffset (8-1133)
  QpC=((ChromaQpTable[0][qPi]+ChromaQpTable[1][qPi]+1)>>1)+cQpPicOffset (8-1133)
- NOTE—The variable cQpPicOffset provides an adjustment for the value of pps_cb_qp_offset or pps_cr_qp_offset, according to whether the filtered chroma component is the Cb or Cr component. However, to avoid the need to vary the amount of the adjustment within the picture, the filtering process does not include an adjustment for the value of slice_cb_qp_offset or slice_cr_qp_offset nor (when cu_chroma_qp_offset_enabled_flag is equal to 1) for the value of CuQpOffset_Cb, CuQpOffset_Cr, or CuQpOffset_CbCr.
  
  The value of the variable β′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,63,Qp_C+(slice_beta_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1134)
  
  where slice_beta_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_beta_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0.
  
  The variable β is derived as follows:
  
  β=β*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1135)
  
  The value of the variable t_C′ is determined as specified in Table 8-18 based on the chroma quantization parameter Q derived as follows:
  
  Q=Clip3(0,65,Qp_C+2*(bS−1)+(slice_tc_offset_div2<<1)) (8-1136)
  
  where slice_tc_offset_div2 is the value of the syntax element slice_tc_offset_div2 for the slice that contains sample q_0,0. The variable t_Cis derived as follows:
  
  t_C=(BitDepth_C<10)?(t_C′+2)>>(10−BitDepth_C): t_C′*(1<<(BitDepth_C−8)) (8-1137)
  
  When maxFilterLengthCbCr is equal to 1 and bS is not equal to 2, maxFilterLengthCbCr is set equal to 0.
  
  When maxFilterLengthCbCr is equal to 3, the following ordered steps apply:
- 1. The variables n1, dpq0c, dpq1c, dpc, dqc and dc, with c=0 . . . 1, are derived as follows:
  
  n1=(subSampleC==2)?1:3 (8-1138)
  dp0c=Abs(pc,_2,0−2*pc,_1,0+pc_0,0) (8-1139)
  dp1c=Abs(pc,_2,n1−2*pc,_1,n1+pc,_0,n1) (8-1140)
  dq0c=Abs(qc,_2,0−2*qc,_1,0+qc,_0,0) (8-1141)
  dq1c=Abs(qc,_2,n1−2*qc,_1,n1+qc,_0,n1) (8-1142)
  dpq0c=dp0c+dq0c (8-1143)
  dpq1c=dp1c+dq1c (8-1144)
  dpc=dp0c+dp1c (8-1145)
  dqc=dq0c+dq1c (8-1146)
  dp=dpq0c+dpq1c (8-1147)
- 2. The variable d is set equal to (d0+d1+1)>>1
- 3. The variables dSam0 and dSam1 are both set equal to 0.
- 4. When d is less than β, the following ordered steps apply:
  - a. The variable dpq is set equal to 2*dpq0.
  - b. The variable dSam0 is derived by invoking the decision process for a chroma sample as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.8 for the sample location (xCb+xBl, yCb+yBl) with sample values p_0,0, p_3,0, q_0,0, and q_3,0, the variables dpq, β and t_Cas inputs, and the output is assigned to the decision dSam0.
  - c. The variable dpq is set equal to 2*dpq1.
  - d. The variable dSam1 is modified as follows:
    - If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, for the sample location (xCb+xBl, yCb+yBl+n1), the decision process for a chroma sample as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.8 is invoked with sample values p_0,n1, p_3,n1, q_0,n1, and q_3,n1, the variables dpq, β and t_Cas inputs, and the output is assigned to the decision dSam1.
    - Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), f or the sample location (xCb+xBl+n1, yCb+yBl), the decision process for a chroma sample as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.8 is invoked with sample values p_0,n1, p_3,n1, q_0,n1and q_3,n1, the variables dpq, β and t_Cas inputs, and the output is assigned to the decision dSam1.
- 5. The variable maxFilterLengthCbCr is modified as follows:
  - If dSam0 is equal to 1 and dSam1 is equal to 1, maxFilterLengthCbCr is set equal to 3.
  - Otherwise, maxFilterLengthCbCr is set equal to 1.
    
    8.8.3.6.4 Filtering Process for Chroma Block Edges
    
    This process is only invoked when ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0.
    
    Inputs to this process are:
- a chroma picture sample array recPicture,
- a chroma location (xCb, yCb) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block relative to the top-left chroma sample of the current picture,
- a chroma location (xBl, yBl) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma block relative to the top-left sample of the current chroma coding block,
- a variable edgeType specifying whether a vertical (EDGE_VER) or a horizontal (EDGE_HOR) edge is filtered,
- a variable maxFilterLengthCbCr containing the maximum chroma filter length,
- 6. A Variable cIdx Specifying the Colour Component Index,
- the variable t_C.
  
  Output of this process is the modified chroma picture sample array recPicture.
  
  The values p_iand q_iwith i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr and k=0 . . . maxK are derived as follows:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl+i][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1150)
  p_i,k=recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl−i−1][yCb+yBl+k] (8-1151)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), the following applies:
  
  q_i,k=recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl+i] (8-1152)
  p_i,k=recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl−i−1] (8-1153)
  
  Depending on the value of edgeType, the following applies:
- If edgeType is equal to EDGE_VER, for each sample location (xCb+xBl, yCb+yBl+k), k=0 . . . maxK, the following ordered steps apply:
- 1. The filtering process for a chroma sample as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.9 is invoked with the variable maxFilterLengthCbCr, the sample values p_i,k, q_i,kwith i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr, the locations (xCb+xBl−i−1, yCb+yBl+k) and (xCb+xBl+i, yCb+yBl+k) with i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr−1, and the variable t_Cas inputs, and the filtered sample values p_i′ and q_i′ with i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr−1 as outputs.
- 2. The filtered sample values p_i′ and q_i′ with i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr−1 replace the corresponding samples inside the sample array recPicture as follows:
  
  recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl+i][yCb+yBl+k]=q_i′ (8-1154)
  recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl−i−1][yCb+yBl+k]=p_i′ (8-1155)
- Otherwise (edgeType is equal to EDGE_HOR), for each sample location (xCb+xBl+k, yCb+yBl), k=0 . . . maxK, the following ordered steps apply:
- 1. The filtering process for a chroma sample as specified in clause 8.8.3.6.9 is invoked with the variable maxFilterLengthCbCr, the sample values p_i,k, q_i,k, with i=0 . . . maxFilterLengthCbCr, the locations (xCb+xBl+k, yCb+yBl−i−1) and (xCb+xBl+k, yCb+yBl+i), and the variable t_Cas inputs, and the filtered sample values p_i′ and q_i′ as outputs.
- 2. The filtered sample values p_i′ and q_i′ replace the corresponding samples inside the sample array recPicture as follows:
  
  recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl+i]=q_i′ (8-1156)
  recPicture[cIdx][xCb+xBl+k][yCb+yBl−i−1]=p_i′

5.11 Embodiment #11

8.8.3.6.3 Decision Process for Chroma Block Edges

[[The variables Qp_Qand Qp_Pare set equal to the Qp_Yvalues of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample q_0,0and p_0,0, respectively.

The variable Qpc is derived as follows:

qPi=Clip3(0,63,((Qp_Q+Qp_p+1)>>1)+cQpPicOffset) (8-1132)
Qp_C=ChromaQpTable[cIdx−1][qPi] (8-1133)]]

When ChromaArrayType is not equal to 0 and treeType is equal to SINGLE_TREE or DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the following applies:

- When treeType is equal to DUAL_TREE_CHROMA, the variable QpY is set equal to the luma quantization Parameter QpY of the luma coding unit that covers the luma location (xCb+cbWidth/2, vCb+cbHeight/2).
- The variables qPCb, qPCr and qPCbCr are derived as follows:
  
  qPiChroma=Clip3(−QpBdOffsetC,63,QpY) (8-935)
  qPiCb=ChromaQpTable[0][qPiChroma] (8-936)
  qPiCr=ChromaQpTable[1][qPiChroma] (8-937)
  qPiCbCr=ChromaQpTable[2][gPiChroma] (8-938)
- The chroma quantization parameters for the Cb and Cr components, Qp′Cb and Qp′Cr, and joint Cb-Cr coding QP′CbCr are derived as follows:
  
  Qp′Cb=Clip3(−QpBdOffsetC,63,qPCb+pps_cb_qp_offset+slice_cb_qp_offset+CuQpOffsetCb)+QpBdOffsetC (8-939)
  Qp′Cr=CliP3(−QPBdOffsetC,63,qPCr+pps_cr_qP_offset+slice_cr_qP_offset+CuQpOffsetCr)+QpBdOffsetC (8-940)
  Qp′CbCr=Clip3(−QpBdOffsetC,63,qPCbCr+pps_cbcr_qp_offset+slice_cbcr_qP_offset+CuQpOffsetCbCr)+QpBdOffsetC (8-941)
  
  The variables QpQ and OPP are set equal to the Qp′Cb value when cIdx is equal to 1, or the Qp′Cr value when cIdx is equal to 2, or Qp′CbCr when tu_joint_cbcr_residual_flag is equal to 1, of the coding units which include the coding blocks containing the sample 0,0 and p0,0, respectively.
  
  The variable OPC is derived as follows:
QpC=(QpQ+QpP+1)>>1

6. Example Implementations of the Disclosed Technology

FIG. 12 is a block diagram of a video processing apparatus 1200. The apparatus 1200 may be used to implement one or more of the methods described herein. The apparatus 1200 may be embodied in a smartphone, tablet, computer, Internet of Things (IoT) receiver, and so on. The apparatus 1200 may include one or more processors 1202, one or more memories 1204 and video processing hardware 1206. The processor(s) 1202 may be configured to implement one or more methods described in the present document. The memory (memories) 1204 may be used for storing data and code used for implementing the methods and techniques described herein. The video processing hardware 1206 may be used to implement, in hardware circuitry, some techniques described in the present document, and may be partly or completely be a part of the processors 1202 (e.g., graphics processor core (GPU) or other signal processing circuitry).

In the present document, the term “video processing” may refer to video encoding, video decoding, video compression or video decompression. For example, video compression algorithms may be applied during conversion from pixel representation of a video to a corresponding bitstream representation or vice versa. The bitstream representation of a current video block may, for example, correspond to bits that are either co-located or spread in different places within the bitstream, as is defined by the syntax. For example, a macroblock may be encoded in terms of transformed and coded error residual values and also using bits in headers and other fields in the bitstream.

It will be appreciated that the disclosed methods and techniques will benefit video encoder and/or decoder embodiments incorporated within video processing devices such as smartphones, laptops, desktops, and similar devices by allowing the use of the techniques disclosed in the present document.

FIG. 13 is a flowchart for an example method 1300 of video processing. The method 1300 includes, at 1310, performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that when a chroma quantization parameter (QP) table is used to derive parameters of the deblocking filter, processing by the chroma QP table is performed on individual chroma QP values.

Some embodiments may be described using the following clause-based format.

- 1. A method of video processing, comprising:
- performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that when a chroma quantization parameter (QP) table is used to derive parameters of the deblocking filter, processing by the chroma QP table is performed on individual chroma QP values.
- 2. The method of clause 1, wherein chroma QP offsets are added to the individual chroma QP values subsequent to the processing by the chroma QP table.
- 3. The method of any of clauses 1-2, wherein the chroma QP offsets are added to values outputted by the chroma QP table.
- 4. The method of any of clauses 1-2, wherein the chroma QP offsets are not considered as input to the chroma QP table.
- 5. The method of clause 2, wherein the chroma QP offsets are at a picture-level or at a video unit-level.
- 6. A method of video processing, comprising:
- performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein the chroma QP offsets are at picture/slice/tile/brick/subpicture level.
- 7. The method of clause 6, wherein the chroma QP offsets used in the deblocking filter are associated with a coding method applied on a boundary of the video unit.
- 8. The method of clause 7, wherein the coding method is a joint coding of chrominance residuals (JCCR) method.
- 9. A method of video processing, comprising:
- performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein information pertaining to a same luma coding unit is used in the deblocking filter and for deriving a chroma QP offset.
- 10. The method of clause 9, wherein the same luma coding unit covers a corresponding luma sample of a center position of the video unit, wherein the video unit is a chroma coding unit.
- 11. The method of clause 9, wherein a scaling process is applied to the video unit, and wherein one or more parameters of the deblocking filter depend at least in part on quantization/dequantization parameters of the scaling process.
- 12. The method of clause 11, wherein the quantization/dequantization parameters of the scaling process include the chroma QP offset.
- 13. The method of any of clauses 9-12, wherein the luma sample in the video unit is in the P side or Q side.
- 14. The method of clause 13, wherein the information pertaining to the same luma coding unit depends on a relative position of the coding unit with respect to the same luma coding unit.
- 15. A method of video processing, comprising:
- performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein an indication of enabling usage of the chroma QP offsets is signaled in the bitstream representation.
- 16. The method of clause 15, wherein the indication is signaled conditionally in response to detecting one or more flags.
- 17. The method of clause 16, wherein the one or more flags are related to a JCCR enabling flag or a chroma QP offset enabling flag.
- 18. The method of clause 15, wherein the indication is signaled based on a derivation.
- 19. A method of video processing, comprising:
- performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein the chroma QP offsets used in the deblocking filter are identical of whether JCCR coding method is applied on a boundary of the video unit or a method different from the JCCR coding method is applied on the boundary of the video unit.
- 20. A method of video processing, comprising:
- performing a conversion between a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video unit, wherein, during the conversion, a deblocking filter is used on boundaries of the video unit such that chroma QP offsets are used in the deblocking filter, wherein a boundary strength (BS) of the deblocking filter is calculated without comparing reference pictures and/or a number of motion vectors (MVs) associated with the video unit at a P side boundary with reference pictures and/or a number of motion vectors (MVs) associated with the video unit at a Q side.
- 21. The method of clause 20, wherein the deblocking filter is disabled under one or more conditions.
- 22. The method of clause 21, wherein the one or more conditions are associated with: a magnitude of the motion vectors (MVs) or a threshold value.
- 23. The method of clause 22, wherein the threshold value is associated with at least one of: i. contents of the video unit, ii. a message signaled in DPS/SPS/VPS/PPS/APS/picture header/slice header/tile group header/Largest coding unit (LCU)/Coding unit (CU)/LCU row/group of LCUs/TU/PU block/Video coding unit, iii. a position of CU/PU/TU/block/Video coding unit, iv. a coded mode of blocks with samples along the boundaries, v. a transform matrix applied to the video units with samples along the boundaries, vi. a shape or dimension of the video unit, vii. an indication of a color format, viii. a coding tree structure, ix. a slice/tile group type and/or picture type, x. a color component, xi. a temporal layer ID, or xii. a profile/level/tier of a standard.
- 24. The method of clause 20, wherein different QP offsets are used for TS coded video units and non-TS coded video units.
- 25. The method of clause 20, wherein a QP used in a luma filtering step is related to a QP used in a scaling process of a luma block.
- 26. A video decoding apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement a method recited in one or more of clauses 1 to 25.
- 27. A video encoding apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement a method recited in one or more of clauses 1 to 25.
- 28. A computer program product having computer code stored thereon, the code, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to implement a method recited in any of clauses 1 to 25.
- 29. A method, apparatus or system described in the present document.

FIG. 15 is a block diagram that illustrates an example video coding system 100 that may utilize the techniques of this disclosure.

As shown in FIG. 15, video coding system 100 may include a source device 110 and a destination device 120. Source device 110 generates encoded video data which may be referred to as a video encoding device. Destination device 120 may decode the encoded video data generated by source device 110 which may be referred to as a video decoding device.

Source device 110 may include a video source 112, a video encoder 114, and an input/output (I/O) interface 116.

Video source 112 may include a source such as a video capture device, an interface to receive video data from a video content provider, and/or a computer graphics system for generating video data, or a combination of such sources. The video data may comprise one or more pictures. Video encoder 114 encodes the video data from video source 112 to generate a bitstream. The bitstream may include a sequence of bits that form a coded representation of the video data. The bitstream may include coded pictures and associated data. The coded picture is a coded representation of a picture. The associated data may include sequence parameter sets, picture parameter sets, and other syntax structures. I/O interface 116 may include a modulator/demodulator (modem) and/or a transmitter. The encoded video data may be transmitted directly to destination device 120 via I/O interface 116 through network 130a. The encoded video data may also be stored onto a storage medium/server 130b for access by destination device 120.

Destination device 120 may include an I/O interface 126, a video decoder 124, and a display device 122.

I/O interface 126 may include a receiver and/or a modem. I/O interface 126 may acquire encoded video data from the source device 110 or the storage medium/server 130b. Video decoder 124 may decode the encoded video data. Display device 122 may display the decoded video data to a user. Display device 122 may be integrated with the destination device 120, or may be external to destination device 120 which be configured to interface with an external display device.

Video encoder 114 and video decoder 124 may operate according to a video compression standard, such as the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard, Versatile Video Coding (VVC) standard and other current and/or further standards.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram illustrating an example of video encoder 200, which may be video encoder 114 in the system 100 illustrated in FIG. 15.

Video encoder 200 may be configured to perform any or all of the techniques of this disclosure. In the example of FIG. 16, video encoder 200 includes a plurality of functional components. The techniques described in this disclosure may be shared among the various components of video encoder 200. In some examples, a processor may be configured to perform any or all of the techniques described in this disclosure.

The functional components of video encoder 200 may include a partition unit 201, a prediction unit 202 which may include a mode select unit 203, a motion estimation unit 204, a motion compensation unit 205 and an intra prediction unit 206, a residual generation unit 207, a transform unit 208, a quantization unit 209, an inverse quantization unit 210, an inverse transform unit 211, a reconstruction unit 212, a buffer 213, and an entropy encoding unit 214.

In other examples, video encoder 200 may include more, fewer, or different functional components. In an example, prediction unit 202 may include an intra block copy (IBC) unit. The IBC unit may perform prediction in an IBC mode in which at least one reference picture is a picture where the current video block is located.

Furthermore, some components, such as motion estimation unit 204 and motion compensation unit 205 may be highly integrated, but are represented in the example of FIG. 5 separately for purposes of explanation.

Partition unit 201 may partition a picture into one or more video blocks. Video encoder 200 and video decoder 300 may support various video block sizes.

Mode select unit 203 may select one of the coding modes, intra or inter, e.g., based on error results, and provide the resulting intra- or inter-coded block to a residual generation unit 207 to generate residual block data and to a reconstruction unit 212 to reconstruct the encoded block for use as a reference picture. In some example, mode select unit 203 may select a combination of intra and inter prediction (CIIP) mode in which the prediction is based on an inter prediction signal and an intra prediction signal. Mode select unit 203 may also select a resolution for a motion vector (e.g., a sub-pixel or integer pixel precision) for the block in the case of inter-prediction.

To perform inter prediction on a current video block, motion estimation unit 204 may generate motion information for the current video block by comparing one or more reference frames from buffer 213 to the current video block. Motion compensation unit 205 may determine a predicted video block for the current video block based on the motion information and decoded samples of pictures from buffer 213 other than the picture associated with the current video block.

Motion estimation unit 204 and motion compensation unit 205 may perform different operations for a current video block, for example, depending on whether the current video block is in an I slice, a P slice, or a B slice.

In some examples, motion estimation unit 204 may perform uni-directional prediction for the current video block, and motion estimation unit 204 may search reference pictures of list 0 or list 1 for a reference video block for the current video block. Motion estimation unit 204 may then generate a reference index that indicates the reference picture in list 0 or list 1 that contains the reference video block and a motion vector that indicates a spatial displacement between the current video block and the reference video block. Motion estimation unit 204 may output the reference index, a prediction direction indicator, and the motion vector as the motion information of the current video block. Motion compensation unit 205 may generate the predicted video block of the current block based on the reference video block indicated by the motion information of the current video block.

In other examples, motion estimation unit 204 may perform bi-directional prediction for the current video block, motion estimation unit 204 may search the reference pictures in list 0 for a reference video block for the current video block and may also search the reference pictures in list 1 for another reference video block for the current video block. Motion estimation unit 204 may then generate reference indexes that indicate the reference pictures in list 0 and list 1 containing the reference video blocks and motion vectors that indicate spatial displacements between the reference video blocks and the current video block. Motion estimation unit 204 may output the reference indexes and the motion vectors of the current video block as the motion information of the current video block. Motion compensation unit 205 may generate the predicted video block of the current video block based on the reference video blocks indicated by the motion information of the current video block.

In some examples, motion estimation unit 204 may output a full set of motion information for decoding processing of a decoder.

In some examples, motion estimation unit 204 may do not output a full set of motion information for the current video. Rather, motion estimation unit 204 may signal the motion information of the current video block with reference to the motion information of another video block. For example, motion estimation unit 204 may determine that the motion information of the current video block is sufficiently similar to the motion information of a neighboring video block.

In one example, motion estimation unit 204 may indicate, in a syntax structure associated with the current video block, a value that indicates to the video decoder 300 that the current video block has the same motion information as the another video block.

In another example, motion estimation unit 204 may identify, in a syntax structure associated with the current video block, another video block and a motion vector difference (MVD). The motion vector difference indicates a difference between the motion vector of the current video block and the motion vector of the indicated video block. The video decoder 300 may use the motion vector of the indicated video block and the motion vector difference to determine the motion vector of the current video block.

As discussed above, video encoder 200 may predictively signal the motion vector. Two examples of predictive signaling techniques that may be implemented by video encoder 200 include advanced motion vector prediction (AMVP) and merge mode signaling.

Intra prediction unit 206 may perform intra prediction on the current video block. When intra prediction unit 206 performs intra prediction on the current video block, intra prediction unit 206 may generate prediction data for the current video block based on decoded samples of other video blocks in the same picture. The prediction data for the current video block may include a predicted video block and various syntax elements.

Residual generation unit 207 may generate residual data for the current video block by subtracting (e.g., indicated by the minus sign) the predicted video block(s) of the current video block from the current video block. The residual data of the current video block may include residual video blocks that correspond to different sample components of the samples in the current video block.

In other examples, there may be no residual data for the current video block for the current video block, for example in a skip mode, and residual generation unit 207 may not perform the subtracting operation.

Transform processing unit 208 may generate one or more transform coefficient video blocks for the current video block by applying one or more transforms to a residual video block associated with the current video block.

After transform processing unit 208 generates a transform coefficient video block associated with the current video block, quantization unit 209 may quantize the transform coefficient video block associated with the current video block based on one or more quantization parameter (QP) values associated with the current video block.

Inverse quantization unit 210 and inverse transform unit 211 may apply inverse quantization and inverse transforms to the transform coefficient video block, respectively, to reconstruct a residual video block from the transform coefficient video block. Reconstruction unit 212 may add the reconstructed residual video block to corresponding samples from one or more predicted video blocks generated by the prediction unit 202 to produce a reconstructed video block associated with the current block for storage in the buffer 213.

After reconstruction unit 212 reconstructs the video block, loop filtering operation may be performed reduce video blocking artifacts in the video block.

Entropy encoding unit 214 may receive data from other functional components of the video encoder 200. When entropy encoding unit 214 receives the data, entropy encoding unit 214 may perform one or more entropy encoding operations to generate entropy encoded data and output a bitstream that includes the entropy encoded data.

FIG. 17 is a block diagram illustrating an example of video decoder 300 which may be video decoder 124 in the system 100 illustrated in FIG. 15.

The video decoder 300 may be configured to perform any or all of the techniques of this disclosure. In the example of FIG. 27, the video decoder 300 includes a plurality of functional components. The techniques described in this disclosure may be shared among the various components of the video decoder 300. In some examples, a processor may be configured to perform any or all of the techniques described in this disclosure.

In the example of FIG. 27, video decoder 300 includes an entropy decoding unit 301, a motion compensation unit 302, an intra prediction unit 303, an inverse quantization unit 304, an inverse transformation unit 305, and a reconstruction unit 306 and a buffer 307. Video decoder 300 may, in some examples, perform a decoding pass generally reciprocal to the encoding pass described with respect to video encoder 200 (e.g., FIG. 16).

Entropy decoding unit 301 may retrieve an encoded bitstream. The encoded bitstream may include entropy coded video data (e.g., encoded blocks of video data). Entropy decoding unit 301 may decode the entropy coded video data, and from the entropy decoded video data, motion compensation unit 302 may determine motion information including motion vectors, motion vector precision, reference picture list indexes, and other motion information. Motion compensation unit 302 may, for example, determine such information by performing the AMVP and merge mode.

Motion compensation unit 302 may produce motion compensated blocks, possibly performing interpolation based on interpolation filters. Identifiers for interpolation filters to be used with sub-pixel precision may be included in the syntax elements.

Motion compensation unit 302 may use interpolation filters as used by video encoder 20 during encoding of the video block to calculate interpolated values for sub-integer pixels of a reference block. Motion compensation unit 302 may determine the interpolation filters used by video encoder 200 according to received syntax information and use the interpolation filters to produce predictive blocks.

Motion compensation unit 302 may use some of the syntax information to determine sizes of blocks used to encode frame(s) and/or slice(s) of the encoded video sequence, partition information that describes how each macroblock of a picture of the encoded video sequence is partitioned, modes indicating how each partition is encoded, one or more reference frames (and reference frame lists) for each inter-encoded block, and other information to decode the encoded video sequence.

Intra prediction unit 303 may use intra prediction modes for example received in the bitstream to form a prediction block from spatially adjacent blocks. Inverse quantization unit 304 inverse quantizes, i.e., de-quantizes, the quantized video block coefficients provided in the bitstream and decoded by entropy decoding unit 301. Inverse transform unit 305 applies an inverse transform.

Reconstruction unit 306 may sum the residual blocks with the corresponding prediction blocks generated by motion compensation unit 302 or intra-prediction unit 303 to form decoded blocks. If desired, a deblocking filter may also be applied to filter the decoded blocks in order to remove blockiness artifacts. The decoded video blocks are then stored in buffer 307, which provides reference blocks for subsequent motion compensation.

FIG. 18 is a block diagram showing an example video processing system 1800 in which various techniques disclosed herein may be implemented. Various implementations may include some or all of the components of the system 1800. The system 1800 may include input 1802 for receiving video content. The video content may be received in a raw or uncompressed format, e.g., 8 or 10 bit multi-component pixel values, or may be in a compressed or encoded format. The input 1802 may represent a network interface, a peripheral bus interface, or a storage interface. Examples of network interface include wired interfaces such as Ethernet, passive optical network (PON), etc. and wireless interfaces such as Wi-Fi or cellular interfaces.

The system 1800 may include a coding component 1804 that may implement the various coding or encoding methods described in the present document. The coding component 1804 may reduce the average bitrate of video from the input 1802 to the output of the coding component 1804 to produce a coded representation of the video. The coding techniques are therefore sometimes called video compression or video transcoding techniques. The output of the coding component 1804 may be either stored, or transmitted via a communication connected, as represented by the component 1806. The stored or communicated bitstream (or coded) representation of the video received at the input 1802 may be used by the component 1808 for generating pixel values or displayable video that is sent to a display interface 1810. The process of generating user-viewable video from the bitstream representation is sometimes called video decompression. Furthermore, while certain video processing operations are referred to as “coding” operations or tools, it will be appreciated that the coding tools or operations are used at an encoder and corresponding decoding tools or operations that reverse the results of the coding will be performed by a decoder.

Examples of a peripheral bus interface or a display interface may include universal serial bus (USB) or high definition multimedia interface (HDMI) or Displayport, and so on. Examples of storage interfaces include serial advanced technology attachment (SATA), peripheral component interconnect (PCI), integrated drive electronics (IDE) interface, and the like. The techniques described in the present document may be embodied in various electronic devices such as mobile phones, laptops, smartphones or other devices that are capable of performing digital data processing and/or video display.

FIG. 19 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 1900 includes, at operation 1910, making a determination, for a conversion between a current video block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is enabled for the current video block based on a color property of the video. The method 1900 also includes, at operation 1920, performing the conversion according to the determination.

In some embodiments, the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process examines a correlation between a luma component and at least one chroma component of the video in a loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the color property includes a color format of the video. In some embodiments, the color property includes a color sampling format of the video. In some embodiments, the color property includes a color down-sampling position or a color down-sampling phase.

In some embodiments, during the conversion, multiple filtering processes including the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process are applied in an order. In some embodiments, the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is applied before a deblocking filtering process. In some embodiments, wherein the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is applied before a sample adaptive offset filtering process. In some embodiments, the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is applied before an adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the order varies for different video units of the video. In some embodiments, a video unit of the different video units comprises a coding tree unit, a coding tree block, a slice, a tile, a brick, a picture, or a sequence.

In some embodiments, the usage of the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is derived during the conversion. In some embodiments, the usage of the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is indicated in the bitstream representation.

In some embodiments, a syntax flag in the bitstream indicates that the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is enabled, and the video includes at least a chroma component. In some embodiments, the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is disabled in case the video includes no chroma component. In some embodiments, the usage of the cross-component adaptive loop filtering process is indicated independently for different color components.

FIG. 20 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2000 includes performing a conversion between a video comprising multiple portions and a bitstream representation of the video. The bitstream representation conforms to a format rule that specifies that a first syntax element indicating usage of a coding tool for coding a first portion in the bitstream representation is selectively included in a first video unit of the bitstream representation based on whether a second syntax element is included in a second video unit of the bitstream representation.

In some embodiments, the first portion of the multiple portions comprises a picture or a slice. In some embodiments, the motion prediction coding tool comprises a Bi-Direction Optical Flow coding tool. In some embodiments, the motion prediction coding tool comprises a Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement coding tool. In some embodiments, the motion prediction coding tool comprises a Prediction Refinement Optical Flow coding tool. In some embodiments, the second syntax element indicates that the first syntax element is included in the bitstream representation. In some embodiments, whether the first syntax element is included in the bitstream representation is further based on a type of a slice of the video. In some embodiments, the second syntax element is signaled in a sequence parameter set. In some embodiments, the first syntax element is signaled in a picture header or a slice header.

FIG. 21 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2100 includes performing a conversion between a picture of a video and a bitstream representation of the video. During the conversion, one or more positions of at least one quantization matrix or at least one dequantization matrix of the block is constant.

In some embodiments, a position of the one or more positions of the at least one quantization matrix is represented as a coordinate (x, y) relative to a video unit of the video, and wherein x and y are constant. In some embodiments, x=0 and y=0. In some embodiments, the video unit comprises a transform unit, a transform block, a picture unit, a picture block, a coding unit, or a coding block.

In some embodiments, a position of the one or more positions of the at least one quantization matrix is same as a position of a Discrete Cosine transform. In some embodiments, at least a position of the one or more positions of the at least one quantization matrix is omitted in the bitstream representation. In some embodiments, an average or a weighted average of the one or more positions of the at least one quantization matrix is constrained to be a constant value. In some embodiments, a deblocking filtering process applicable to the block is based on the constant value. In some embodiments, the constant value is included in a decoding parameter set, a video parameter set, a slice parameter set, a picture parameter set, a slice header, a picture header, a tile header, or a brick header of the bitstream representation. In some embodiments, during the conversion, one or more syntax elements are included in a picture header of the bitstream representation to indicate a quantization matrix to be used for the picture.

FIG. 22 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2200 includes, at operation 2210, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, usage of a chroma quantization parameter offset list based on a characteristic of the block, where the characteristic comprises a prediction mode, a picture type, a slice type, a tile type, or a brick type of the block. The method 2200 also includes, at operation 2220, performing the conversion based on the determining. In some embodiments, the usage of the chroma quantization parameter offset list is different for different coding modes of the video, the different coding modes comprising at least one of: an intra mode, an inter mode, a palette mode, an intra block copy (IBC) mode, a transform skip mode, a block differential pulse-code modulation (BDPCM) mode, a transform quantization skip mode, or a lossless mode.

FIG. 23 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2300 includes, at operation 2310, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a quantization parameter used in a deblocking filtering process based on a characteristic of the block. The method 2300 also includes, at operation 2320, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the characteristic comprises a position of a sample of the block relative to a boundary of a video unit. The video unit comprises a coding tree unit, a coding tree block, or a virtual pipeline data unit. In some embodiments, the quantization parameter is a luma quantization parameter of the block in case the position of the sample is along a boundary of the block. In some embodiments, the boundary comprises a horizontal edge. In some embodiments, the boundary comprises a vertical edge. In some embodiments, the deblocking filtering process is based on the luma quantization parameter of the block that is positioned on a first side of the boundary. In some embodiments, the deblocking filtering process is based on a luma quantization parameter of another block that is positioned on a second side of the boundary.

In some embodiments, the quantization parameter for the deblocking filtering process comprises at least a luma quantization parameter of the block that is positioned on a first side of the boundary or a chroma quantization parameter of another block that is positioned on a second side of the boundary. In some embodiments, the quantization parameter for the deblocking filtering process comprises at least a chroma quantization parameter of the block that is positioned on a first side of the boundary or a luma quantization parameter of another block that is positioned on a second side of the boundary.

In some embodiments, the deblocking filtering process is based on a function of chroma quantization parameters of the block that is positioned on a first side of the boundary or another block that is positioned on a second side of the boundary. In some embodiments, the function comprises an averaging function that averages multiple chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the averaging function returns an average of 8, 16, 32, 64, or all chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the function comprises a maximum function of multiple chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the maximum function returns a maximum of 8, 16, 32, 64, or all chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the function comprises a minimum function of multiple chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the minimum function returns a minimum of 8, 16, 32, 64, or all chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the function comprises a subsampling function of multiple chroma quantization parameters. In some embodiments, the subsampling function returns a k-th sample of N chroma quantization parameters, where k being an integer and N being 8, 16, 32, 64, or all quantization parameters. In some embodiments, k is 1, (N/2)−1, (N/2), or N for each N samples of the chroma quantization parameters.

FIG. 24 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2400 includes, at operation 2410, performing a conversion between a picture of a video and a bitstream representation of the video. During the conversion, a quantization parameter for a chroma component of the picture is constrained to be same as a chroma row segment having a length of 4×m and a position of (4×m×x, 2×y) relative a top-left corner of the picture, x and y being non-negative integers and m being a positive integer. In some embodiments, m=1. In some embodiments, a width of a quantization group for the chroma component of the picture is greater than or equal to 4×m.

FIG. 25 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2500 includes, at operation 2510, performing a conversion between a picture of a video and a bitstream representation of the video. During the conversion, a quantization parameter for a chroma component of the picture is constrained to be same as a chroma column segment having a length of 4×n and a position of (4×n×y, 2×x) relative a top-left corner of the picture, x and y being non-negative integers and n being a positive integer. In some embodiments, n=1. In some embodiments, a height of a quantization group for the chroma component of the picture is greater than or equal to 4×n.

In some embodiments, the conversion includes encoding the video into the bitstream representation. In some embodiments, the conversion includes decoding the bitstream representation into the video.

Some embodiments of the disclosed technology include making a decision or determination to enable a video processing tool or mode. In an example, when the video processing tool or mode is enabled, the encoder will use or implement the tool or mode in the processing of a block of video, but may not necessarily modify the resulting bitstream based on the usage of the tool or mode. That is, a conversion from the block of video to the bitstream representation of the video will use the video processing tool or mode when it is enabled based on the decision or determination. In another example, when the video processing tool or mode is enabled, the decoder will process the bitstream with the knowledge that the bitstream has been modified based on the video processing tool or mode. That is, a conversion from the bitstream representation of the video to the block of video will be performed using the video processing tool or mode that was enabled based on the decision or determination.

Some embodiments of the disclosed technology include making a decision or determination to disable a video processing tool or mode. In an example, when the video processing tool or mode is disabled, the encoder will not use the tool or mode in the conversion of the block of video to the bitstream representation of the video. In another example, when the video processing tool or mode is disabled, the decoder will process the bitstream with the knowledge that the bitstream has not been modified using the video processing tool or mode that was enabled based on the decision or determination.

The disclosed and other solutions, examples, embodiments, modules and the functional operations described in this document can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this document and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. The disclosed and other embodiments can be implemented as one or more computer program products, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them. A propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.

The processes and logic flows described in this document can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an field programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random-access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; and compact disc, read-only memory (CD ROM) and digital versatile disc read-only memory (DVD-ROM) disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any subject matter or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular techniques. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.

Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.

Claims

1. A method of processing video data, comprising: making a determination, for a conversion between a current video unit of a video and a bitstream of the video, whether a first filtering process is enabled for the current video unit based on a color sampling format of the video; andperforming the conversion according to the determination,wherein the first filtering process is based on a correlation between a luma component and at least one chroma component of the video in a loop filtering process,wherein luma positions of luma samples of the luma component used in the first filtering process are determined based on the color sampling format.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein in response to the first filtering process being enabled, the color sampling format of the video is 4:2:0, 4:2:2, or 4:4:4.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein filter coefficients for the first filtering process are included in an adaptation parameter set, and the adaptation parameter set is allowed to be referenced in a slice header of a slice to which the current video unit belongs.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein a first syntax element indicating usage of a coding tool for coding at least a first portion of multiple portions of the video is selectively included in a first video unit level of the bitstream based on a second syntax element included in a second video unit level of the bitstream.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the first portion of the multiple portions comprises a picture, and the first video unit level is a picture header.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the coding tool comprises a Bi-Direction Optical Flow coding tool.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein the coding tool comprises a Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement coding tool.
8. The method of claim 4, wherein the second video unit level is a sequence parameter set.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the conversion includes encoding the video into the bitstream.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the conversion includes decoding the video from the bitstream.
11. An apparatus for processing video data comprising a processor and a non-transitory memory with instructions thereon, wherein the instructions upon execution by the processor, cause the processor to: make a determination, for a conversion between a current video unit of a video and a bitstream of the video, whether a first filtering process is enabled for the current video unit based on a color sampling format of the video; andperform the conversion according to the determination,wherein the first filtering process is based on a correlation between a luma component and at least one chroma component of the video in a loop filtering process,wherein luma positions of luma samples of the luma component used in the first filtering process are determined based on the color sampling format.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein in response to the first filtering process being enabled, the color sampling format of the video is 4:2:0, 4:2:2, or 4:4:4.
13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein filter coefficients for the first filtering process are included in an adaptation parameter set, and the adaptation parameter set is allowed to be referenced in a slice header of a slice to which the current video unit belongs.
14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein a first syntax element indicating usage of a coding tool for coding at least a first portion of multiple portions of the video is selectively included in a first video unit level of the bitstream based on a second syntax element included in a second video unit level of the bitstream; wherein the first portion of the multiple portions comprises a picture, and the first video unit level is a picture header;wherein the coding tool comprises a Bi-Direction Optical Flow coding tool;wherein the coding tool comprises a Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement coding tool; andwherein the second video unit level is a sequence parameter set.
15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that cause a processor to: make a determination, for a conversion between a current video unit of a video and a bitstream of the video, whether a first filtering process is enabled for the current video unit based on a color sampling format of the video; andperform the conversion according to the determination,wherein the first filtering process is based on a correlation between a luma component and at least one chroma component of the video in a loop filtering process,wherein luma positions of luma samples of the luma component used in the first filtering process are determined based on the color sampling format.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein in response to the first filtering process being enabled, the color sampling format of the video is 4:2:0, 4:2:2, or 4:4:4; and wherein filter coefficients for the first filtering process are included in an adaptation parameter set, and the adaptation parameter set is allowed to be referenced in a slice header of a slice to which the current video unit belongs.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein a first syntax element indicating usage of a coding tool for coding at least a first portion of multiple portions of the video is selectively included in a first video unit level of the bitstream based on a second syntax element included in a second video unit level of the bitstream; wherein the first portion of the multiple portions comprises a picture, and the first video unit level is a picture header;wherein the coding tool comprises a Bi-Direction Optical Flow coding tool;wherein the coding tool comprises a Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement coding tool; andwherein the second video unit level is a sequence parameter set.
18. A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium storing a bitstream of a video which is generated by a method performed by a video processing apparatus, wherein the method comprises: making a determination, for a current video unit of the video, whether a first filtering process is enabled for the current video unit based on a color sampling format of the video; andgenerating the bitstream according to the determination,wherein the first filtering process is based on a correlation between a luma component and at least one chroma component of the video in a loop filtering process,wherein luma positions of luma samples of the luma component used in the first filtering process are determined based on the color sampling format.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium of claim 18, wherein in response to the first filtering process being enabled, the color sampling format of the video is 4:2:0, 4:2:2 or 4:4:4; and wherein filter coefficients for the first filtering process are included in an adaptation parameter set, and the adaptation parameter set is allowed to be referenced in a slice header of a slice to which the current video unit belongs.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable recording medium of claim 18, wherein a first syntax element indicating usage of a coding tool for coding at least a first portion of multiple portions of the video is selectively included in a first video unit level of the bitstream based on a second syntax element included in a second video unit level of the bitstream;wherein the first portion of the multiple portions comprises a picture, and the first video unit level is a picture header;wherein the coding tool comprises a Bi-Direction Optical Flow coding tool;wherein the coding tool comprises a Decoder-side Motion Vector Refinement coding tool; andwherein the second video unit level is a sequence parameter set.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/716,447, filed on Apr. 8, 2022, which is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/054959, filed on Oct. 9, 2020, which claims the priority to and benefits of International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2019/110229, filed on Oct. 9, 2019. All the aforementioned patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (211)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
5512953	Nahumi	Apr 1996	A
6016163	Rodriguez	Jan 2000	A
6833993	Wang	Dec 2004	B2
7474357	Murdock	Jan 2009	B1
7843414	Hsu	Nov 2010	B2
D661490	Jin	Jun 2012	S
8211570	He	Jul 2012	B2
8252463	He	Aug 2012	B2
8306124	Gao	Nov 2012	B2
8817208	Li	Aug 2014	B2
9137547	Van der Auwera	Sep 2015	B2
9229877	Bivens	Jan 2016	B2
9538200	Van der Auwera	Jan 2017	B2
9591302	Sullivan	Mar 2017	B2
9723331	Van der Auwera	Aug 2017	B2
9734026	Hack	Aug 2017	B2
9807403	Chong	Oct 2017	B2
10057574	Li	Aug 2018	B2
10085024	Yu	Sep 2018	B2
10095698	Cullen	Oct 2018	B2
10097832	Sullivan	Oct 2018	B2
10319100	Dai	Jun 2019	B2
10321130	Dong	Jun 2019	B2
10506230	Zhang	Dec 2019	B2
10582213	Li	Mar 2020	B2
10708591	Zhang	Jul 2020	B2
10708592	Dong	Jul 2020	B2
10778974	Karczewicz	Sep 2020	B2
10855985	Zhang	Dec 2020	B2
11184643	Korta et al.	Nov 2021	B2
11539956	Li	Dec 2022	B2
11622120	Zhu	Apr 2023	B2
11750806	Zhu et al.	Sep 2023	B2
11785260	Zhu et al.	Oct 2023	B2
11863715	Zhu et al.	Jan 2024	B2
11902518	Zhu	Feb 2024	B2
11973959	Zhu et al.	Apr 2024	B2
11991390	Yoo	May 2024	B2
20020106025	Tsukagoshi	Aug 2002	A1
20030206585	Kerofsky	Nov 2003	A1
20040062313	Schoenblum	Apr 2004	A1
20040101059	Joch	May 2004	A1
20040146108	Hsia	Jul 2004	A1
20070098799	Zhang	May 2007	A1
20070162591	Mo	Jul 2007	A1
20070201564	Joch	Aug 2007	A1
20090219994	Tu	Sep 2009	A1
20090262798	Chiu	Oct 2009	A1
20090289320	Cohen	Nov 2009	A1
20120183052	Lou	Jul 2012	A1
20120192051	Rothschiller	Jul 2012	A1
20130016772	Matsunobu	Jan 2013	A1
20130022107	Van der Auwera	Jan 2013	A1
20130077676	Sato	Mar 2013	A1
20130101018	Chong	Apr 2013	A1
20130101025	Van der Auwera	Apr 2013	A1
20130101031	Van der Auwera	Apr 2013	A1
20130107970	Wang	May 2013	A1
20130107973	Wang	May 2013	A1
20130188731	Kim	Jul 2013	A1
20130188733	Van der Auwera	Jul 2013	A1
20130259141	Van der Auwera	Oct 2013	A1
20130329785	Lim	Dec 2013	A1
20140003497	Sullivan	Jan 2014	A1
20140003498	Sullivan	Jan 2014	A1
20140192904	Rosewarne	Jul 2014	A1
20140321552	He	Oct 2014	A1
20140355689	Tourapis	Dec 2014	A1
20140362917	Joshi	Dec 2014	A1
20140376611	Kim	Dec 2014	A1
20150043637	Morigami	Feb 2015	A1
20150071345	Tourapis	Mar 2015	A1
20150181976	Cooper	Jul 2015	A1
20150264354	Zhang	Sep 2015	A1
20150264374	Xiu	Sep 2015	A1
20150264402	Zhang	Sep 2015	A1
20150319438	Shima	Nov 2015	A1
20150358631	Zhang	Dec 2015	A1
20150365671	Pu	Dec 2015	A1
20150365695	Pu	Dec 2015	A1
20150373327	Zhang	Dec 2015	A1
20160065991	Chen	Mar 2016	A1
20160100167	Rapaka	Apr 2016	A1
20160100168	Rapaka	Apr 2016	A1
20160100175	Laroche	Apr 2016	A1
20160179521	Jha	Jun 2016	A1
20160212373	Aharon	Jul 2016	A1
20160227224	Hsieh	Aug 2016	A1
20160241853	Lim	Aug 2016	A1
20160241858	Li	Aug 2016	A1
20160261864	Samuelsson	Sep 2016	A1
20160261884	Li	Sep 2016	A1
20160286226	Ridge	Sep 2016	A1
20160286235	Yamamoto	Sep 2016	A1
20160337661	Pang et al.	Nov 2016	A1
20170034532	Yamamoto	Feb 2017	A1
20170048525	Lim	Feb 2017	A1
20170070754	Lim	Mar 2017	A1
20170105014	Lee	Apr 2017	A1
20170127077	Chuang	May 2017	A1
20170127090	Rosewarne	May 2017	A1
20170134728	Sullivan	May 2017	A1
20170150151	Samuelsson	May 2017	A1
20170150157	Yamori	May 2017	A1
20170238020	Karczewicz	Aug 2017	A1
20170310969	Chen	Oct 2017	A1
20170332075	Karczewicz	Nov 2017	A1
20180027246	Liu	Jan 2018	A1
20180041778	Zhang	Feb 2018	A1
20180041779	Zhang	Feb 2018	A1
20180048901	Zhang	Feb 2018	A1
20180063527	Chen	Mar 2018	A1
20180084284	Rosewarne	Mar 2018	A1
20180091812	Guo	Mar 2018	A1
20180091829	Liu	Mar 2018	A1
20180109794	Wang	Apr 2018	A1
20180115787	Koo	Apr 2018	A1
20180146197	Yi	May 2018	A1
20180160112	Gamei	Jun 2018	A1
20180199057	Chuang	Jul 2018	A1
20180205949	Hsiang	Jul 2018	A1
20180278934	Andersson	Sep 2018	A1
20180338161	Zhai	Nov 2018	A1
20180352246	Laroche	Dec 2018	A1
20180352264	Guo	Dec 2018	A1
20180373710	Cullen	Dec 2018	A1
20190020875	Liu	Jan 2019	A1
20190089984	He	Mar 2019	A1
20190098307	Sullivan	Mar 2019	A1
20190116358	Zhang	Apr 2019	A1
20190124330	Chien	Apr 2019	A1
20190158831	Jung	May 2019	A1
20190208206	Nakagami	Jul 2019	A1
20190230353	Gadde	Jul 2019	A1
20190238845	Zhang	Aug 2019	A1
20190238849	Fang	Aug 2019	A1
20190273923	Huang	Sep 2019	A1
20190289320	Chuang	Sep 2019	A1
20190306502	Gadde	Oct 2019	A1
20200021845	Lin	Jan 2020	A1
20200177910	Li	Jun 2020	A1
20200213570	Shih	Jul 2020	A1
20200236381	Chujoh	Jul 2020	A1
20200267381	Vanam	Aug 2020	A1
20200329239	Hsiao	Oct 2020	A1
20200396467	Lai	Dec 2020	A1
20200413038	Zhang	Dec 2020	A1
20200413100	Hsiang et al.	Dec 2020	A1
20210006792	Han	Jan 2021	A1
20210021841	Xu	Jan 2021	A1
20210021863	Kalva	Jan 2021	A1
20210044820	Furht	Feb 2021	A1
20210051320	Tourapis	Feb 2021	A1
20210058643	Zhao	Feb 2021	A1
20210076032	Hu	Mar 2021	A1
20210099727	Deng	Apr 2021	A1
20210099732	Ray	Apr 2021	A1
20210120239	Zhu	Apr 2021	A1
20210160479	Hsiang	May 2021	A1
20210176464	Ray	Jun 2021	A1
20210176479	Liao	Jun 2021	A1
20210176501	Chen	Jun 2021	A1
20210195201	Li	Jun 2021	A1
20210211700	Li	Jul 2021	A1
20210266550	Li	Aug 2021	A1
20210266552	Kotra	Aug 2021	A1
20210266556	Choi	Aug 2021	A1
20210314628	Zhang	Oct 2021	A1
20210321095	Zhang	Oct 2021	A1
20210321121	Zhang	Oct 2021	A1
20210321138	Samuelsson et al.	Oct 2021	A1
20210337239	Zhang	Oct 2021	A1
20210344903	Yu	Nov 2021	A1
20210368171	Zhang	Nov 2021	A1
20210377524	Zhang	Dec 2021	A1
20210385446	Liu	Dec 2021	A1
20210385454	Fleureau	Dec 2021	A1
20210392381	Wang	Dec 2021	A1
20210409701	Zhu	Dec 2021	A1
20220014782	Chon	Jan 2022	A1
20220019496	Lozano et al.	Jan 2022	A1
20220038693	Zhang et al.	Feb 2022	A1
20220070460	Ikonin et al.	Mar 2022	A1
20220078433	Yoo et al.	Mar 2022	A1
20220141495	Kim	May 2022	A1
20220159282	Sim	May 2022	A1
20220182641	Nam et al.	Jun 2022	A1
20220191496	Kotra	Jun 2022	A1
20220201294	Nam	Jun 2022	A1
20220210408	Zhu	Jun 2022	A1
20220210433	Zhu et al.	Jun 2022	A1
20220210448	Zhu	Jun 2022	A1
20220217410	Wang	Jul 2022	A1
20220264122	Zhu	Aug 2022	A1
20220272347	Zhu	Aug 2022	A1
20220295091	Chujoh	Sep 2022	A1
20220303567	Jung	Sep 2022	A1
20220312042	Deshpande	Sep 2022	A1
20220321916	Zhu et al.	Oct 2022	A1
20220329794	Kotra	Oct 2022	A1
20220337836	Zhao	Oct 2022	A1
20220345697	Choi	Oct 2022	A1
20220345726	Zhao	Oct 2022	A1
20220368898	Zhu	Nov 2022	A1
20230007255	Tsukuba	Jan 2023	A1
20230018055	Hendry et al.	Jan 2023	A1
20230040376	Samuelsson et al.	Feb 2023	A1
20230068404	Deshpande	Mar 2023	A1
20230085937	Deshpande et al.	Mar 2023	A1
20230130131	Chiang	Apr 2023	A1
20230156194	Sullivan	May 2023	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (62)

Number	Date	Country
104137545	Nov 2014	CN
104205836	Dec 2014	CN
104221376	Dec 2014	CN
104221378	Dec 2014	CN
104584559	Apr 2015	CN
104584560	Apr 2015	CN
105960802	Sep 2016	CN
105979271	Sep 2016	CN
106105203	Nov 2016	CN
106105205	Nov 2016	CN
106416249	Feb 2017	CN
106797465	May 2017	CN
107079150	Aug 2017	CN
107079157	Aug 2017	CN
107211122	Sep 2017	CN
107409215	Nov 2017	CN
107431826	Dec 2017	CN
107534782	Jan 2018	CN
107534783	Jan 2018	CN
107846591	Mar 2018	CN
108293124	Jul 2018	CN
109076210	Dec 2018	CN
109196862	Jan 2019	CN
109691102	Apr 2019	CN
110121884	Aug 2019	CN
114946180	Aug 2022	CN
3425911	Jan 2019	EP
3507984	Jul 2019	EP
2506852	Apr 2014	GB
2506852	Sep 2015	GB
2575090	Jan 2020	GB
2015512600	Apr 2015	JP
2019525679	Sep 2019	JP
2020017970	Jan 2020	JP
2022542851	Oct 2022	JP
2022544164	Oct 2022	JP
2023011955	Jan 2023	JP
2023500644	Jan 2023	JP
7508558	Jul 2024	JP
20150003246	Jan 2015	KR
102750625	Jan 2025	KR
2636103	Nov 2017	RU
201424378	Jun 2014	TW
2008016219	Feb 2008	WO
2012117744	Sep 2012	WO
2012177202	Dec 2012	WO
2014008212	Jan 2014	WO
2014039547	Mar 2014	WO
2015015058	Feb 2015	WO
2015053697	Apr 2015	WO
2015187978	Dec 2015	WO
2016040865	Mar 2016	WO
2016049894	Apr 2016	WO
2016057665	Apr 2016	WO
2016123232	Aug 2016	WO
2017052440	Mar 2017	WO
2018234716	Dec 2018	WO
2018237146	Dec 2018	WO
2019009776	Jan 2019	WO
2019069950	Apr 2019	WO
2019147910	Aug 2019	WO
2019173522	Sep 2019	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (198)

Entry
Norkin et al. “HEVC Deblocking Filter,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Dec. 2012, 22(12):1746-1754. entire document.
Sullivan et al. “Standardized Extensions of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC),” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Dec. 2013, 7(6):1001-1016. entire document.
Gao et al. “AVS—The Chinese Next-Generation Video Coding Standard,” National Association Broadcasters, 2004, retrieved on Dec. 16, 2020 from http://www.avs.org.cn/reference/AVS%20NAB%Paper%20Final03.pdf.
Han et al. “Cu Level Chroma QP Control for VVC,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting, Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, document JVET-O1168, 2019. abstract, sections 2-3.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6), ”Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, abstract , section 7.3.8.10, 10.1.2.3, 15.1.1.3.
JVET-P0436, Zhao, J., et al., “AHG15: On CU Adaptive Chroma QP Offset Signalling,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 5 pages, Abstract, sections 1-4.
Abdoli et al. “Intra Block-DPCM with Layer Separation of Screen Content in VVC,” 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), IEEE, 2019, Sep. 25, 2019, retrieved on Feb. 21, 2021 from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8803389.
Marpe et al. “An Adaptive Color Transform Approach and its Application in 4:4:4 Video Coding,” 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference, IEEE, 2006, Spetember 8, 2006, retrieved on Feb. 21, 2021 from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7071266.
Misra et al. “On Cross Component Adaptive Loop Filter for Video Compression,” 2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), Nov. 12-15, 2019, Ningbo, China, retrieved from the internet URL:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8954547.
Gordon et al. “Mismatch on BDPCM Luma/Chroma Contect Indices Between VTM7 and Spec,” in Fraunhofer.de [online] Nov. 14, 2019, retrieved Mar. 1, 2021, retrieved from the internet URL: https://jvet.hhi.fraunhofer.de/trac/vvc/ticket/708.
Wan et al. “Consistent Chroma QP Derivation in the Deblocking and Inverse Quantization Processes,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 11th Meeting, Shanghai, CN, Oct. 10-19, 2012, document JCTVC-K0145, 2012.
JCTVC-K0220, Kanumuri, S., et al., “Use of Chroma QP offsets in Deblocking,” oint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Shanghai, CN, Oct. 10-19, 2012, the whole document.
Xu et al. “Non-CE5: Chroma QP Derivation Fix for Deblocking Filter (Combination of JVET-P0105 and JVET-P0539),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P1002, 2019, the whole document.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6), ”Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, pp. 87-97, paragraph 7.4.3.3; pp. 120-129, paragraph 7.4.7.1; pp. 149-151, paragraph 7.4.9.10; pp. 280-282, paragraph 8.7.1; pp. 326-328, paragraph 8.8.3.6.3.
Wan et al. “Consistent Chroma QP Derivation in the Deblocking and Inverse Quantization Processes,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 11th Meeting, Shanghai, CN, Oct. 10-19, 2012, document JCTVC-K0145, 2012. sections 1-3, 6.5-6.6.
JCTVC-K0220, Kanumuri, S., et al., “Use of Chroma QP offsets in Deblocking,” oint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Shanghai, CN, Oct. 10-19, 2012, the whole document , in particular section 2.1.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 455 pages. Section 8.7.1, 8.8.3.6, 8.8.3.6.3, 8.8.3.6.4 , in particular equations 8-939 to 8-941 and 8-1133.
Xu et al. “Non-CE5: Chroma QP Derivation Fix for Deblocking Filter (Combination of JVET-P0105 and JVET-P0539),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P1002, 2019. abstract , section 2.
Zhao et al. “AHG15: On CU Adaptive Chroma Offset Signalling,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P0436, 2019. the whole document.
Han et al. “Cu Level Chroma QP Control for VVC,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting, Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, document JVET-01168, 2019. the whole document.
JVET-O2002-v2, Chen, J., et al., “Algorithm description for Versatile Video Coding and Test Model 6 (VTM 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 89 pages. p. 17, paragraph 3.2.6.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6), ”Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 455 pages. Abstract ; tables 8-18; sections 1,6.3.2; sectons 8.1, 8.7.1, 8.8.3; pp. 326-327; p. 282.
JCTVC-K0145_r1, Wan, W., et al., “Consistent chroma QP derivation in deblocking and inverse quantization processes”, Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Shanghai, CN, Oct. 10-19, 2012, 5 pages. abstract ; section 3.
JCTVC-K0220, Kanumuri, S., et al., “Use of Chroma QP offsets in Deblocking,” oint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 11th Meeting: Shanghai, CN, Oct. 10-19, 2012, 3 pages. Abstract.
Document: JCTVC-O0089, Kim, W., et al., “AhG5: Deblocking Filter in 4:4:4 Chroma Format,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 23-Nov. 1, 2013, 6 pages. parapraphs [7.3.2.3],[7.3.6.1].
Document: JVET-P1006-v2, Wan, W., et al., “AHG17: Text for picture header,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 5 pages. p. 136.
Document: JVET-N0473-v4, Misra, K., et al., “Non-CE11: On ISP transform boundary deblocking,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 14th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019,4 pages. p. 68, paragraphs 7.3.2.2, 7.4.3.2.
Sjoberg et al., “HEVC High-Level Syntax” In: “High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) : Algorithms and Architectures” Aug. 23, 2014, Springer, ISBN: 978-3-319-06895-4 pp. 13-48, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-06895-4_2 paragraph [2.3.4] verbal reports from subgroups at 128th Meeting, No. N18748, p. 4.
“Verbal reports from subgroups at 128th Meeting 128,” MPEG Meeting; Oct. 7, 2019-Oct. 11, 2019; Geneva; (Motion Picture Expert Group or ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11), (Nov. 27, 2019) Retrieved from the Internet: http://phenix.int-evry.fr/mpeg/doc_end _user/documents/128_Geneva/wg11/w18748-v2-w18748.zip.
Wan et al. “AHG17: Text for Picture Header,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P1006, 2019. the whole document.
Document: JVET-P0517_r1, Xiu, X., et al., “Support of adaptive color transform for 444 video coding in VVC,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 13 pages.
Misra, K., et al., “On Cross Component Adaptive Loop Filter for Video Compression,” 2019 Picture Coding Symposium (PCS), Nov. 12-15, 2019, 5 pages. Paragraph [0004]—paragraph [0146] , figures 1-14.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6), ”Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, pp. 73-76, paragraph 7.3.8.10; pp. 87-104, paragraph 7.4.3.2—paragraph 7.4.3.4; pp. 149-151, paragraph 7.4.9.10; pp. 326-328, paragraph 8.8.3.6.3.
De-Luxian-Hernandez et al. “Non-CE3/Non-CE8: Enable Transform Skip in CUs Using ISP,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 14th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, document JVET-N0401, 2019. p. 1, paragraph 1.
Document: JCTVC-U0106, Xiu, X., et al., “On signaling adaptive color transform at TU level,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 21st Meeting: Warsaw, PL, Jun. 19-26, 2015, 5 pages. The whole document.
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, document JVET-O2001-v14, 2019. pp 40-43; 50-54; 73-76; 97-104; 120-129; 149-151; 280-282; 326-328.
Document: JVET-O566-v2, Xu, J., et al., “Non-CE5: Consistent deblocking for chroma components,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 4 pages. pp. 1-4.
Document: JVET-P0105-v2, Kotra, A., et al., “Non-CE5: Modified Chroma QP derivation for deblocking filter,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 14 pages. pp. 1-5.
Document: JVET-P1001-v1, Kotra, A., et al., “Non-CE5: Chroma QP derivation fix for deblocking filter (Combination of JVET-P0105 and JVET-P0539),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 7 pages. pp. 1-7.
Kotra et al., Priority document PCT/EP2019072643 (Year: 2019).
Xu et al. “Non-CE5: Chroma QP Derivation Fix for Deblocking Filter (Combination of JVET-P0105 and JVET-P0539),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P1002, 2019, abstract , sections 1-3, 7.4.3.1, 8.7.1.
Kim et al. “AhG5: Deblocking Filter in 4:4:4 Chroma Format,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 23-Nov. 1, 2013. document JCTVC-O0089-v1, 2013.
Wan et al. “AHG17: Text for Picture Header,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P1006-v2, 2019. the whole document.
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, document JVET-O2001, 2019.
Document: JVET-O0413-v3, Morigami, Y., et al., “Chroma deblocking filter adjustments for 4:4:4 and 4:2:2 format,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 7 pages.
“High Efficiency Video Coding,” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems: Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Coding of Moving Video, ITU-T Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU, H.265, Feb. 2018.
Bross et al. “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 7),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P2001, 2019.
Chen et al. “Algorithm Description for Versatile Video Coding and Test Model 6 (VTM 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG WP 3 and SI/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting, Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, document JVET-O2002, 2019.
Chen et al. “Algorithm Description of Joint Exploration Test Model 7 (JEM 7),” Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 7th Meeting: Torino, IT, Jul. 13-21, 2017, document JVET-G1001, 2017.
Document: JCTVC-Y1002, Rosewarne, et al., “High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Test Model 16 (HM 16) Improved Encoder Description,” Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 25th Meeting: Chengdu, CN, Oct. 14-21, 2016, 70 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0253-v1, Kotra, A., et al., “CE5-related: High level syntax modifications for CCALF,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 8 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0190-v1, Chubach, O., et al., “CE5-related: On CC-ALF modifications related to coefficients and signalling,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 13 pages.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE, Bross, B., et al., “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 455 pages.
Document: JVET-00650-v4, Ramasubramonian, et al., AHG15: On signalling of chroma QP tables Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 4 pages.
Document: JVET-P2001-vE, “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 7),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 491 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0058, “CE5 Common Base: Cross Component Adaptive Loop Filter,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 5 pages.
Bossen, F., et al., Retrieved from the Internet: https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de/jvet/VVCSoftware_VTM/tags/VTM-6.0, Sep. 19, 2022, 2 pages.
JEM-7.0: https://jvet.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn_HMJEMSoftware/tags/ HM-16.6-JEM, Aug. 26, 2022.
Misra et al. “Non-CE11: On ISP Transform Boundary Deblocking,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 14th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, document JVET-N0473, 2019.
Misra et al. “Non-CE11: On ISP Transform Boundary Deblocking,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 14th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, document JVET-N0473-r2, 2019.
Ramasubramonian et al. “AHG15: On Signalling of Chroma QP Tables,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, document JVET-O0650, 2019.
Xiu et al. “Support of Adaptive Color Transform for 444 Video Coding in VVC,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, document JVET-P0517, 2019.
De-Luxian-Hernandez et al. “Non-CE3/Non-CE8: Enable Transform Skip in CUs Using ISP,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 14th Meeting, Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, document JVET-N0401-v5, 2019.
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,253 dated Mar. 24, 2023.
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20899673.6 dated Dec. 15, 2022 (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20909161.0 dated Feb. 7, 2023 (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20877874.6 dated Feb. 10, 2023 (17 pages).
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/852,934 dated Jan. 12, 2023.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Feb. 23, 2023.
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/810,187 dated Jan. 9, 2023.
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20862153.2 dated Oct. 5, 2022 (12 pages).
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20876422.5 dated Oct. 20, 2022 (7 pages).
Partial Supplementary European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20877874.6 dated Oct. 31, 2022 (15 pages).
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/720,582 dated Nov. 14, 2022.
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/856,631 dated Nov. 10, 2022.
Examination Report from Indian Patent Application No. 202247013800 dated Jul. 21, 2022 (7 pages).
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,253 dated Jul. 12, 2022.
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/720,634 dated Jul. 19, 2022.
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,647 dated Aug. 17, 2022.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Sep. 30, 2022.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/050638 dated Nov. 30, 2020 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/050644 dated Dec. 18, 2020 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/050649 dated Feb. 12, 2021 (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/051689 dated Dec. 17, 2020 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/054959 dated Feb. 12, 2021 (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/055329 dated Jan. 19, 2021 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/055332 dated Jan. 29, 2021 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/063746 dated Apr. 8, 2021 (14 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/067264 dated Mar. 23, 2021 (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/067651 dated Mar. 30, 2021 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/067655 dated Mar. 30, 2021 (10 pages).
Non Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Jun. 9, 2022.
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20862628.3 dated Dec. 14, 2022 (7 pages).
Extended European Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20862629.1 dated Oct. 27, 2022 (11 pages).
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Apr. 7, 2023.
Corrected Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 17/716,447 dated Mar. 17, 2023.
Corrected Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 17/716,447 dated May 18, 2023.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/716,447 dated Feb. 1, 2023.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/716,447 dated Aug. 4, 2022.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/720,582 dated Jun. 26, 2023.
Corrected Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,647 dated Mar. 29, 2023.
Corrected Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,647 dated Apr. 19, 2023.
Corrected Notice of Allowability from U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,647 dated Jun. 8, 2023.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/835,647 dated Jan. 18, 2023.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Dec. 11, 2023, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/856,631 dated Nov. 24, 2023, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/810,187 dated Nov. 16, 2023, 26 pages.
Document: JVET-P2001-vE, Bross, B., et al., “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 7),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) ol ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 491 pages.
Suehring, K., et al., Retrieved from the Internet: https://vcgit.hhi.fraunhofer.de/jvetAA/CSoftware_VTM/tags/VTM-7.0, Sep. 25, 2022, 2 pages.
“Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems Infrastructure of audiovisual services—Coding of moving video High efficiency video coding,” ITU-T and ISO/IEC, KHigh efficiency video coding 1, Rec. Itu-T H.265 \| ISO/IEC 23008-2, Feb. 2018, 692 pages.
Document: JCTVC-Y1002, Rosewarne, C “et al.” High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Test ModeM6 (HM 16) Improved Encoder Description Update 7,M Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC) of ITU-T SG16 WP3 and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29A/VG11 25th Meeting: Chengdu, CN, Oct. 14-21, 2016, 70 pages.
Document: JVET-G1001, Chen, J., et al., Algorithm description of JointExploration Test Model 7 (JEM7), 11 Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 7th Meeting: Torino, IT, Jul. 13-21, 2017, 50 pages.
Document: JVET-O2001, Bross, B., et al., Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6)H, Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 455 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0041-v2, Wang, Y.K., et al. “AHG2: Editorial input on WC draft text,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 2 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0513 r2, Xiu, X., et al., “AHG16: Clipping residual samples for ACT,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 11 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0820-v3, Lagrange P., et al., “ACT: common text for bug fixes and transform change,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 7 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0521-v1, Zhu, et al., “Alignment of BDPCM for ACT,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 6 pages.
Document: JVET-P0517-r1, Xiu, X., et al., “Support of adaptive color transform for 444 video coding in WC,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/EC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 4 pages.
Document: JVET-O0166, Clare, G., et al., “CE8-related: BDPCM for chroma,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 5 pages.
Document: JVET-N0368, Zhao, X., et al., “An implementation of adaptive color transform in WC,”Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 14th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Mar. 19-27, 2019, 3 pages.
Document: JVET-R0058-v5, Wang, Y-K., et al., “AHG8/AHG9/AHG12: On the combination of RPR, subpictures, and scalability,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 18th Meeting: by teleconference, Apr. 15-24, 2020, 10 pages.
Document: JVET-S0105 Mccarthy, S., et al., “AHG9: Modification of general constraint information,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC I/SC 29/WG 11 19th Meeting: by teleconference, Jun. 22-Jul. 1, 2020, 16 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0423-v1, Li, L., et al., “Interaction between ACT and BDPCM chroma,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/[EC JTC I/SC 29/WVG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 3 pages.
Document: JVET-P0436, Zhao, J., et al., AHG15: On CU Adaptive Chroma QP Offset Signalling Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 5 p.
Document: JVET-Q0305-v2, Dou, L., et al., “Disallowing JCCR mode for ACT coded CUs,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 4 pages.
Document: JVET-P2002, Chen, J., et al., Algorithm description for Versatile Video Coding and Test Model 7 (VTM 7) Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 90 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0420-V1, Li, L., et al., “AHG12: Signaling of chroma presence in PPS and APS,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 3 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0815, Zhang, L., et al., “BoG on ACT,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/[EC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 3 pages.
Document: JVET-P1001, Kotra, A., et al., Non-CE5: Chroma QP derivation fix for deblocking filter (Combination of JVET-P0105 and JVET-P0539)n Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/EC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, 7 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0114-v1, Wang, Y., “AHG9: A few more general contraints flags,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11,17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 3 pages.
Document: JVET-R0286, Chang, Y., et al., “AhG9: On general contraint information syntax,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11,18th Meeting: by teleconference, Apr. 15-24, 2020, 5 pages.
Document: JVET-M0413, Said, A., et al., “CE5: Per-cx)ntext CABAC initialization with single window (Test 5.1.4),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 13th Meeting: Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9-18, 2019, 3 pages.
JEM-7.0 Retrieved from the internet: https://jvet.hhi.fraunhofer.de/svn/svn_HMJEMSoftware/tags/ HM-16.6-JEM-7.0. Sep. 19, 2022, 1 page.
Document: JVET-L0553, Li, X., et al., Fix of Initial QP Signaling Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 12th Meeting: Macao, CN, Oct. 3-12, 2018, 2 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0520-v1, Wang, Y., et al., “AHG9: Cleanups on signaling for CC-ALF, BDPCM, ACT and Palette,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WVG 11 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 6 pages.
Document: JVET-Q0241-v3, Jung, J., et al., “On QP adjustment in adaptive color transform,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP3and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11,17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, 5 pages.
Office Action from Japanese Office Action from Japanese Application No. 2022-541250 dated Aug. 29, 2023, 13 pages. With English Translation.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Mar. 27, 2024, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/322,428 dated Mar. 28, 2024, 67 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/137941 dated Mar. 22, 2021, 10 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/137946 dated Mar. 22, 2021, 9 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/070279 dated Apr. 1, 2021, 11 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/070282 dated Mar. 23, 2021, 13 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/070580 dated Mar. 22, 2021, 12 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/071659 dated Apr. 6, 2021, 14 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/072017 dated Apr. 19, 2021, 14 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/070265 dated Mar. 26, 2021, 14 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/071660 dated Mar. 31, 2021, 11 pages.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/CN2021/072396 dated Mar. 29, 2021, 14 pages.
Extended European Search Report from European Application No. 21736195.5 dated Mar. 15, 2023, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/857,874 dated Jan. 26, 2023, 23 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/857,924 dated Feb. 3, 2023, 23 pages.
Chinese Office Action from Chinese Application No. 202180009357.4 dated Apr. 7, 2023, 13 pages. With English Translation.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/857,874 dated Jul. 6, 2023, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/864,011 dated Apr. 25, 2024, 38 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/524,994 dated Jun. 21, 2024, 56 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/856,631 dated Jun. 4, 2024, 45 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/856,631 dated Sep. 26, 2024, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/810,187 dated Aug. 1, 2024, 34 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/498,665 dated Sep. 26, 2024, 106 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/519,994 dated Aug. 14, 2024, 125 pages.
Vietnamese Office Action from Vietnamese Patent Application No. 1-2022-01641 dated Aug. 30, 2024, 4 pages.
Advisory Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/720,582, mailed Jun. 1, 2023, 3 Pages.
Bross B., et al., “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 7),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, Document: JVET-P2001-v9, 495 p.
Chen et al., “Description of Core Experiment 4 (CE4): Inter Prediction with Geometric Partitioning,” Joint Video Expertf Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 16th Meeting: Geneva, CH, Oct. 1-11, 2019, Document JVET-P2024, 2019.
Chinese Notice of Allowance from Chinese Patent Application No. 202080088208.7 dated Jan. 8, 2025, 6 pages.
Chinese Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 202080088208.7 dated May 31, 2024, 17 pages.
Chubach O., et al., “CE5-Related: On CC-ALF Modifications Related to Coefficients and Signalling,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 6 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 17th Meeting, Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, Document: JVET-Q0190-v1, 13 Pages.
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Application No. 2022-541250, mailed Jan. 9, 2024, 5 Pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/842,025, mailed Jan. 13, 2023, 23 Pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/856,631, mailed Mar. 2, 2023, 19 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 17/864,011 dated Nov. 14, 2024, 51 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 18/524,994 dated Nov. 21, 2024, 26 pages.
Foreign Communication From a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2020/137946, mailed Mar. 22, 2021, 9 Pages.
Foreign Communication From a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/070265, mailed Mar. 26, 2021, 14 Pages.
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/070279, mailed Apr. 1, 2021, 11 Pages.
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/070282, mailed Mar. 23, 2021, 13 Pages.
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/070580, mailed Mar. 22, 2021, 12 Pages.
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/071659, mailed Apr. 6, 2021, 14 Pages.
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/071660, mailed Mar. 31, 2021, 11 Pages.
Foreign Communication from a Related Counterpart Application, International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/CN2021/072017, mailed Apr. 19, 2021, 14 Pages.
Jung J., et al., “On QP adjustment in adaptive color transform,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, Document: JVET-Q0241-v3, 5 pages.
Li L., et al., “AHG12: Signaling of Chroma Presence in PPS and APS,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, Document: JVET-Q0420-v1, 3 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305, mailed Aug. 10, 2023, 13 Pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 18/498,652 dated May 22, 2024, 54 pages.
Non-Final Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 17/842,025, mailed Sep. 13, 2022, 11 Pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 17/857,924, mailed Apr. 17, 2024, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 17/694,305 dated Nov. 5, 2024, 28 pages.
Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2022-534625, mailed May 16, 2023, 27 Pages.
Said A., et al., “CE5: Per-Context CABAC Initialization with Single Window (Test 5.1.4),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 13th Meeting, Marrakech, MA, Jan. 9, 2019-Jan. 18, 2019, Document: JVET-M0413, 231 Pages.
Wang Y., et al., “AHG9: Cleanups onsignaling for Cc Alf, Bdpcm, Act and Palette,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 17thMeeting: Brussels, BE,Jan. 7-17, 2020, Document: JVET-Q0520-v1, 6pages.
Xu J., et al., “Non-CE5: Consistent Deblocking for Chroma Components,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, Document: JVET-O566-v1, 13 Pages.
Kotra A.M., et al., “CE5-related: High Level Syntax Modifications for CCALF,” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, 17th Meeting: Brussels, BE, Jan. 7-17, 2020, Document: JVET-Q0253-v1, 8 Pages.
Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention for Chinese Application No. 202080064322.6, mailed Jan. 10, 2025, 6 pages.
Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention for Chinese Application No. 202080091580.3, mailed Jan. 10, 2025, 6 pages.
Decision to Grant a Patent for Japanese Application No. 2023-203628, mailed Jan. 21, 2025, 5 pages.
Document: JVET-O2001-vE, Bross, B., et al., “Versatile Video Coding (Draft 6),” Joint Video Experts Team (JVET) of ITU-T SG 16 WP 3 and ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WVG 11 15th Meeting: Gothenburg, SE, Jul. 3-12, 2019, 455 pages.
Written Decision on Registration for Korean Application No. 10-2022-7005307, mailed Jan. 22, 2025, 5 Pages.

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20230300380 A1	Sep 2023	US

Continuations (2)

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	17716447	Apr 2022	US
Child	18322466		US
Parent	PCT/US2020/054959	Oct 2020	WO
Child	17716447		US

Cross-component adaptive loop filtering in video coding

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Disclaimer

Term Extension

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

US Referenced Citations (211)

Foreign Referenced Citations (62)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (198)

Related Publications (1)

Continuations (2)