The present application is related to commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/411,337 entitled DIELECTRIC RESONATORS AND CIRCUITS MADE THEREFROM filed on Sep. 17, 2002 and commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 10/268,415 entitled DIELECTRIC RESONATORS AND CIRCUITS MADE THEREFROM filed on even date herewith.
The invention pertains to dielectric resonator circuits and, more particularly, to cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits used in circuits such as microwave filters, oscillators, triplexers, antennas, etc.
Dielectric resonators are used in many circuits, particularly microwave circuits, for concentrating electric fields. They can be used to form filters, oscillators, triplexers and other circuits. The higher the dielectric constant of the dielectric material out of which the resonator is formed, the smaller the space within which the electric fields are concentrated. Suitable dielectric materials for fabricating dielectric resonators are available today with dielectric constants ranging from approximately 10 to approximately 150 (relative to air). These dielectric materials generally have a magnetic constant of 1, i.e., they are transparent to magnetic fields.
As is well known in the art, dielectric resonators and resonator filters have multiple modes of electrical fields and magnetic fields concentrated at different center frequencies. A mode is a field configuration corresponding to a resonant frequency of the system as determined by Maxwell's equations. In a dielectric resonator, the fundamental resonant mode frequency, i.e., the lowest frequency, is the transverse electric field mode, TE01 (or TE, hereafter). Typically, it is the fundamental TE mode that is the desired mode of the circuit or system into which the resonator is incorporated. The second mode is commonly termed the hybrid mode, H11 (or H11, hereafter). The Ha, mode is excited from the dielectric resonator, but a considerable amount of electric field lays outside the resonator and, therefore, is strongly affected by the cavity. The H11 mode is the result of an interaction of the dielectric resonator and the cavity within which it is positioned. The H11 mode field is orthogonal to the TE mode field. There also are additional higher modes. Typically, all of the modes other than the mode of interest, e.g., the TE mode, are undesired and constitute interference. The H11 mode, however, typically is the only interference mode of significant concern. The remaining modes usually have substantial frequency separation from the TE mode and thus do not cause significant interference with operation of the system. The H11 mode, however, tends to be rather close in frequency to the TE mode. In addition, as the frequency of the TE mode is tuned, the center frequency of the TE mode and the H11 mode move in opposite directions to each other. Thus, as the TE mode is tuned to increase its center frequency, the center frequency of the H11 mode inherently moves downward and, thus, closer to the TE mode center frequency. By contrast, the third mode, commonly called the H12 mode, not only is sufficiently spaced in frequency from the TE mode so as not to cause significant problems, but, in addition, it moves in the same direction as the TE mode responsive to tuning.
Conductive adjusting screws (not shown) coupled to the enclosure may be placed in the irises to further affect the coupling of the fields between adjacent resonators and provide adjustability of the coupling between the resonators, but are not used in the example of
A cross-coupler 34 having a metal probe 34a extending through a non-conductive bushing 34b is used to couple resonators separated by walls without irises to obtain more optimum filter transfer functions. The non-conductive bushing 34b electrically isolates the probe 34a from the enclosure 24 so that electric fields coincident to the probe 34a are not absorbed by the walls of the enclosure, but rather are passed from one end of the probe 34a to the other for coupling resonators adjacent the ends of the probe 34a.
By way of example, the field of resonator 10a couples to the field of resonator 10b through iris 30a, the field of resonator 10b further couples to the field of resonator 10c through iris 30b, and the field of resonator 10c further couples to the field of resonator 10d through iris 30c. In addition, the field of resonator 10a further couples to the field of resonator 10c through cross-coupler 34. Wall 32a, which does not have an iris or a cross-coupler, prevents the field of resonator 10a from coupling with the physically adjacent resonator 10d on the other side of the wall 32a.
One or more metal plates 42 may be positioned adjacent each resonator to affect the field of the resonator to set the center frequency of the filter. Particularly, plate 42 may be mounted on a screw 44 passing through a top surface (not shown) of the enclosure 24. The screw 44 may be rotated to vary the spacing between the plate 42 and the resonator 10 to adjust the center frequency of the resonator. A coupling loop connected to an output coupler 38 is positioned adjacent the last resonator 10d to couple the microwave energy out of the filter 20. Signals also may be coupled into and out of a dielectric resonator circuit by other methods, such as microstrips positioned on the bottom surface 44 of the enclosure 24 adjacent the resonators. The sizes of the resonators 10, their relative spacing, the number of resonators, the size of the cavity 22, the size of the irises 30, and the size and position of the metal plates 42 all need to be precisely controlled to set the desired center frequency of the filter, the bandwidth of the filter, and the rejection in the stop band of the filter. More specifically, the bandwidth of the filter is controlled primarily by the amount of coupling of the electric and magnetic fields between the resonators. Generally, the closer the resonators are to each other, the more coupling between them and the wider the bandwidth of the filter. On the other hand, the center frequency of the filter is controlled in large part by the size of the resonator and the size and the spacing of the metal plates 42 from the corresponding resonators 10.
In an alternative prior art cross-coupled dielectric resonator filter, coaxial cables are used to couple resonators that are separated by walls without irises and/or are not adjacent to one another. A detailed discussion of cross-coupled dielectric resonators is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,748,058 to Scott entitled CROSS COUPLED BANDPASS FILTER, incorporated fully herein by reference.
Prior art cross-coupled dielectric resonator filters have limited frequency bandwidth performance. The maximum frequencies at which they can perform effectively are typically limited to about 55 to 60 GHz. The effective bandwidth range of prior art cross-coupled dielectric resonator filters is typically on the order of 3 to 20 MHz. In particular, the bandwidth is restricted because the coupling between resonators is limited.
Prior art resonators and the cross-coupled resonator circuits made from them have many drawbacks. For instance, as a result of the positions of the fields of the resonators, prior art resonators have limited ability to couple with other resonators (or with other microwave devices such as loop couplers and microstrips). That is why filters made from prior art resonators have limited bandwidth range. Further, prior art cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits rely on probes or coaxial cables for cross-coupling, and filter poles may have to be laid in a zig-zag manner, which put significant constraints on filter performance. In addition, prior art cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits such as the filter 20 shown in
Furthermore, the volume and configuration of the conductive enclosure 24, substantially affects the operation of the system. The enclosure minimizes radiative loss. However, it also has a substantial effect on the center frequency of the TE mode. Accordingly, not only must the enclosure be constructed of a conductive material, but it must be very precisely machined to achieve precise coupling and the desired center frequency performance, thus adding complexity and expense to the fabrication of the system. Even with very precise machining, the design can easily be marginal and fail specification.
Furthermore, prior art resonators have poor mode separation between the desired TE mode and the undesired H11 mode.
The H11 mode field 60 is orthogonal to the TE mode. The electric field lines of field 60 form circles parallel to the page in
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide improved cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits.
It is another object of the present invention to provide improved cross-coupled dielectric resonator filters.
It is another object of the present invention to provide cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits in which the H11 mode is substantially suppressed or eliminated.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits that are easily tunable.
It is one more object of the present invention to provide cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits with more effective coupling and cross-coupling than in the state of the art.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits with improved Q factors.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuits with improved layouts.
It is one more object of the present invention to provide cross-coupled dielectric resonator filters having compact packaging.
The invention is an improved cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuit. In one form, the circuit includes dielectric resonators varying in cross-sectional area between first and second ends. The resonators are arranged relatively to each other within an enclosure in a very efficient and compact design that enhances adjustability and coupling between adjacent resonators (i.e., resonators having longitudinal axes that are closest in a substantially linear direction perpendicular to the axes) and between at least one pair of alternate resonators (i.e., resonators having longitudinal axes that are on opposite sides of the longitudinal axis of another resonator in a substantially linear direction perpendicular to the axes).
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, an adjustable conductive member is associated with a resonator positioned between a pair of alternate resonators. Adjusting the conductive members affects the cross-coupling of the field between the alternate resonators. If the conductive member is electrically coupled to the enclosure, the alternate resonators will be inductively cross-coupled. If the conductive member is electrically isolated from the enclosure, the alternate resonators with be capacitively cross-coupled.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment, a plurality of resonators having bodies that vary in cross-sectional area are arranged in an enclosure such that the longitudinal orientation of each resonator is flipped relative to its adjacent resonator or resonators. This arrangement permits positioning of the resonators within a much smaller space than possible with comparable uniform cross-sectional area resonators. This particular arrangement enhances coupling, cross-coupling, and adjustability and thus expands the frequency and bandwidth range achievable by such a filter.
The varying cross-sectional area dielectric resonators physically displace the H11 mode from the TE mode in the longitudinal direction. Particularly, the TE mode tends to concentrate in the base (the wider portion) while the H11 mode tends to concentrate at the top (the narrower portion). By removing the top so as to eliminate the portion where the H11 mode field exists, yet keep the portion where the TE mode exists, the H11 mode can be virtually eliminated while having little effect on the magnitude of the TE mode. The angle of the side wall (i.e., its taper), can be controlled to adjust the physical separation of the TE and H11 modes. The radius of a longitudinal hole through the resonator between the first and second ends can be adjusted either in steps or entirely to optimize insertion loss, volume, spurious response and other properties. The improved frequency separation between the TE mode and H11 mode combined with the physical separation thereof enables tuning of the center frequency of the TE mode with a substantial reduction or even entire elimination of any effect of the tuning on the H11 mode. This design also provides better quality factor for the TE mode, generally up to 10% better because more of the TE field is outside of the resonator due to the taper in the longitudinal direction. It also enhances coupling to other microwave devices such as microstrips, conductive loops, and other resonators, enabling the construction of wider bandwidth filters.
In the drawings, the same reference numerals are used to indicate the same elements.
A field may be coupled into the filter 500 through any reasonable means known in the prior art or discovered in the future, including by forming microstrips on a surface of the enclosure or by use of coupling loops as described in the background section of this specification. In one embodiment, a field supplied from a coaxial cable is coupled to an input coupling loop 508 positioned near the first resonator 502a and passed at an output coupling loop 510 positioned near the last resonator 502h.
The plurality of resonators 502 are arranged within the enclosure in any configuration suitable to achieve the performance goals of the filter. In the illustrated embodiment, the resonators 502 are positioned such that their longitudinal axes are parallel to each other, but not collinear, and generally reside in one of two planes perpendicular to their longitudinal axes. For example, resonators 502a, c, e, g reside in one plane and resonators 502b, d, f, h reside in another plane. As will be described in detail below, the resonators 502 may be moved along their longitudinal axes for tuning purposes (i.e., to adjusting the bandwidth of the filter) and therefore may not reside exactly in the same plane, however, the movement is typically small and the resonators will remain in the vicinity of their respective planes. The resonators 502 are positioned to permit electromagnetic field coupling between adjacent resonators, i.e., resonators having longitudinal axes that are closest in a substantially linear direction perpendicular to their longitudinal axes (e.g., resonators 502a, b). The resonators 502 are further positioned to permit electromagnetic field cross-coupling between at least one pair of alternate resonators, i.e., resonators having longitudinal axes that are on opposite sides of the longitudinal axis of another resonator in a substantially linear direction perpendicular to their longitudinal axes (e.g., resonators 502a, c). In at least one preferred embodiment, the resonators have a dielectric constant of at least 45 and are formed of barium tetratitanate.
In the illustrated embodiment, the resonators 502 vary in cross-sectional area in a longitudinal direction between a first end and a second end, such as between a base 506a and a top 506b. The illustrated resonators each contain a longitudinal through hole, such as through hole 504, the radius of which can be selected to optimize insertion loss, volume, spurius response and other properties. Further, the radius of the longitudinal through hole can be variable, such as comprising one or more steps. A detailed discussion of the characteristics of such resonators is included below and additional information regarding these resonators can be found in the related, commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/411,337 entitled DIELECTRIC RESONATORS AND CIRCUITS MADE THEREFROM filed on Sep. 17, 2002 and the related, commonly assigned, co-pending U.S. non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 10/268,415 entitled DIELECTRIC RESONATORS AND CIRCUITS MADE THEREFROM filed on the same date as the present application, both of which are incorporated fully herein by reference.
Preferably, each resonator 502 is longitudinally inverted relative to its adjacent resonator or resonators. Thus, resonator 502a is right side up, resonator 502b is upside down, resonator 502c is right side up, etc. This arrangement permits the resonators to be placed in closer proximity to one another than in the prior art, thus smaller enclosures 501 are obtainable over the prior art.
Each resonator 502 is coupled to the enclosure 501 via a mounting member, such as mounting member 512. In the illustrated embodiment, except for the first and last resonators 502a, h, the mounting member is at least partially positioned between the resonators on either side of the resonator to which the mounting member is attached (i.e., between alternate resonators). The mounting member 512 is parallel to the longitudinal axis of the resonator 502e and, preferably, is coaxial thereto. The mounting member 512 in the illustrated embodiment is adjustable to position the resonator 502e for tuning and, preferably, is non-conductive to prevent interference with the coupling between the adjacent and alternate resonators.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, the displacement of the resonators relative to each other is fixed in the transverse direction upon assembly, but is adjustable in the longitudinal direction after assembly. Particularly, in one embodiment, the mounting members are threaded mounting cylinders that are screwed into threaded holes, such as threaded hole 516 in the side wall 501b of the enclosure. The resonators 502 also may be adjustably mounted on the mounting cylinder. Particularly, the through holes in the resonators 502 may also be threaded to mate with the threads of the mounting cylinder. Accordingly, by rotating the mounting cylinder relative to the holes in the enclosure 501 and/or the through holes in the resonators 502, the longitudinal positions of the resonators relative to each other and to the enclosure 501 can be adjusted easily.
In a preferred embodiment, however, the resonators are fixedly mounted to the mounting cylinders and the mounting cylinders are rotatable only within the holes 516 in the enclosure. If the holes in the enclosure are through holes, the resonator spacing, and thus the bandwidth of the filter, can be adjusted without even opening the enclosure 501 simply by rotating the mounting cylinders that protrude from the enclosure.
In the embodiment illustrated in
An alternative mounting member and conductive member arrangement is depicted in
An alternative mounting member and conductive member arrangement is depicted in
Referring back to
The filter 500 further includes circular conductive tuning plates, such as tuning plate 540, adjustably mounted on the enclosure 501 so that they can be moved longitudinally relative to the bases of the resonators 502. As in the prior art, these tuning plates are used to adjust the center frequency of the TE mode of the resonators, and thus the filter. These plates may be threaded cylinders having a uniform diameter that pass through holes 544 in the enclosure 501 to provide adjustability after assembly. In an alternative embodiment, the plates may be adjustably mounted to the enclosure with a threaded cylinder having a smaller diameter than the plate similar to the plates 42 discussed above in connection with
Because of the mode separation, as described in detail below, between the TE and the H11 modes and the physical separation of the TE and H11 modes inherent to resonators that vary in cross-sectional area between a first end and a second end, in dielectric resonator circuits employing these resonators, it is possible to tune the center frequency of the TE mode with very little effect on the H11 mode. Any effect of TE mode center frequency tuning on the H11 mode can be even further reduced or eliminated by making the tuning plate of a small radius, such as slightly larger than the radius of the longitudinal through hole of the resonator. By making the tuning plate small, the plate can primarily remain outside of the H11 mode field yet still extend significantly into stronger portions of the TE field and, thus, still significantly affect it. This is especially advantageous in the cross-coupled dielectric resonator circuit of the present invention where the resonators are positioned in close proximity to one another and cross-coupling is to occur between alternate resonators. In one preferred embodiment of the invention, the tuning plate has a radius smaller than the base of the resonator but larger than the radius of a through hole extending longitudinally through the resonator. In a more preferred embodiment, the tuning plate has a radius of between about 120% and about 150% the radius of the through hole.
The threaded cylinders associated with the resonators, tuning plates, and conductive members can be coupled to electronically controlled mechanical rotating means to remotely tune the filter. For instance, the cylinders can be remotely controlled to tune the filter using local stepper motors and digital signal processors (DSP) that receive instructions via wired or wireless communication systems. The operating parameters of the filter may be monitored by additional (DSPs) and even sent via the wired or wireless communication system to a remote location to affirm correct tuning, thus forming a truly remote-controlled servo filter.
The present invention also can use conventional, cylindrical dielectric resonators. For instance, the varying cross-sectional area resonators 502a–h in
Since the design of the cross coupled dielectric resonator filter of the present invention inherently provides for wide flexibility of coupling between adjacent and alternate, non-adjacent resonators, a circuit can be easily designed in which the enclosure can be fabricated using low-cost molding or casting processes, with lower cost materials and without the need for precision or other expensive milling operations, thus substantially reducing manufacturing costs. A filter constructed in accordance with the principals of the present invention such as illustrated in
The resonators are positioned within the enclosure 501 such that their longitudinal axes are parallel to each other, but not collinear. As described above, the resonators preferably vary in cross-sectional area, with the base of the resonator represented by a large circle, such as outer circle 702 associated with resonator 502a, and the top of the resonator represented by a smaller circle, such as inner circle 704 associated with resonator 502a. The resonators are preferably inverted longitudinally to their adjacent resonators to permit the resonators to be placed in close proximity. Partial walls 530 containing a gap 532 are associated with at least one of the resonators, e.g., resonator 502b. Mounting members and conductive members, such as those described in detail above, are used to position the resonators and control cross-coupling between alternate resonators, respectively.
In view of the above detailed description of filter 500, the operation of a filter in accordance with the layout depicted in
Dielectric Resonator Details
Referring to
Referring to
The use of these types of resonators is particularly well suited for use in the cross-coupled dielectric resonator filters of
In conical resonators, the area of the dielectric material parallel to the field lines of the TE mode varies monotonically in the direction perpendicular to the field lines of the TE mode. Stated in less scientific terms, the amount of dielectric material in the resonator assembly decreases as a mathematical function of height. For instance, in the right conical resonator illustrated in
A=□(b−h/tan( ))2
where A=horizontal cross-sectional area
b=radius at the base of the cone
h=selected height
=angle of the side wall of the cone to the base of the cone.
In a stepped cylindrical embodiment, the area is constant over portions of the height, but decreases in discrete steps. In the stepped conical embodiment, the area of the dielectric material decreases with height according to the formula above (with slight modifications that would be readily apparent to those of skill in geometry to account for the discrete steps), but also has one or more discrete steps. In the conical embodiment illustrated by
Having thus described a few particular embodiments of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. For example, the mounting members may mount the resonators in a fixed position with tuning being fixed upon assembly or adjusted through the use of tuning plates and/or conductive members. Such alterations, modifications and improvements as are made obvious by this disclosure are intended to be part of this description though not expressly stated herein, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only, and not limiting. The invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3475642 | Karp et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
4028652 | Wakino et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4138652 | Nishikawa et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4267537 | Karmel | May 1981 | A |
4283649 | Heinouchi | Aug 1981 | A |
4423397 | Nishikawa et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4459570 | Delaballe et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4477785 | Atia | Oct 1984 | A |
4578655 | Etienne et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4620168 | Delestre et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4661790 | Gannon et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4757289 | Kosugi et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4810984 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821006 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4835498 | Rouger et al. | May 1989 | A |
4881051 | Tang et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5059929 | Tanaka | Oct 1991 | A |
5109207 | Aizawa et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5140285 | Cohen | Aug 1992 | A |
5218330 | Omiya et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5347246 | Remillard et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5525945 | Chiappetta et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5614875 | Jang et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5691677 | De Maron et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5748058 | Scott | May 1998 | A |
5777534 | Harrison | Jul 1998 | A |
5841330 | Wenzel et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5859574 | Schmitt | Jan 1999 | A |
5949309 | Correa | Sep 1999 | A |
5990767 | Ivanov et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6087910 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100703 | Davidov et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111339 | Ohya et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6208227 | Remillard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6254708 | Cappabianca | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262639 | Shu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6337664 | Mayes et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6402981 | Sasaki | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6707353 | Yamakawa et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6717490 | Mayer | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6784768 | Pance et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20040051602 | Pance et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040051603 | Pance et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 492 304 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 601 370 | Jun 1994 | EP |
1 162 684 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 181 740 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 376 938 | Dec 1974 | GB |
1 520 473 | Aug 1978 | GB |
57-014202 | Jan 1982 | JP |
59-202701 | Nov 1984 | JP |
363280503 | Nov 1988 | JP |
01-144701 | Jun 1989 | JP |
02-042898 | Feb 1990 | JP |
02-137502 | May 1990 | JP |
02-168702 | Jun 1990 | JP |
05-102714 | Apr 1993 | JP |
05-267940 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06-061714 | Mar 1994 | JP |
07-15116 | Jun 1995 | JP |
07-154114 | Jun 1995 | JP |
03-249803 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO 0070706 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0143221 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 04027917 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050200435 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |