The disclosure relates to a cross-rolling mill for rolling a block over a mandrel so as to form a hollow block. The disclosure additionally relates to a method for producing a hollow block out of a block using such a cross-rolling mill.
When rolling a metallic hollow block over a mandrel by means of the so-called “Mannesmann process,” a preheated block, in the case of steel a block preheated to approximately 1,250° C., is rolled so as to form a hollow block by means of two or more main working rollers over a mandrel located between the rollers. During the rolling process, the working rollers exert a substantially radially aligned rolling force onto the block and are mounted and supported in a roll stand, a so-called “mill stand,” in such a manner that at least the rolling gap between the working rollers can be adjusted to the desired wall thickness of the hollow block to be produced. For decades, mechanical spindle drives have been used for this purpose; these allow at least one adjustment of the rolling gaps prior to and after the rolling process. Nevertheless, it is not possible to adjust the rolling gap during the rolling process, in particular not to adjust the rolling gap automatically during the rolling process itself.
As such, it is an object of the disclosure to specify a cross-rolling mill along with a method for rolling a block over a mandrel so as to form a hollow block, by means of which the problems known from the prior art are solved and preferably an automated compensation of disturbance variables that is determined during the rolling process is enabled.
This object is achieved with a cross-rolling mill comprising the features as disclosed herein and a method comprising the features as disclosed herein.
In accordance with a first aspect, a cross-rolling mill for rolling a block over a mandrel to form a hollow block is specified, with which, instead of the mechanical actuators previously used, such as spindle drives, hydraulic actuators, preferably hydraulic capsules, are provided to modify the rolling gap, preferably also the alignment of the rolling axis of at least one of the working rollers relative to the block. The modification of the rolling gap by means of hydraulic actuators with respect to the block as workpiece is understood to mean that the working rollers are realigned with respect to each other as required, by which the dimension and geometry of the rolling gap remain variable even during the rolling process. During the rolling process, an alignment is thus carried out relative to the block to be formed so as to form a hollow block, between the respective rolling processes and during the rolling processes, the alignment of at least one of the rolling axes is therefore also or alternatively carried out relative to the other working roller(s). Thereby, the hydraulic actuators are preferably connected in a manner customary in the industry with chocks, by means of which the working rollers are adjustably mounted in the respective roll stand.
This makes available the first cross-rolling mill that, on the basis of the hydraulic actuators, allows a modification to the rolling gap geometry or any other type of compensation for disturbance variables even during the rolling process.
The working rollers are pre-adjusted to a certain distance relative to each other, the so-called “rolling gap,” by means of the hydraulic actuators. In the cross-rolling mill, the mandrel held by a mandrel bar is located symmetrically between the working rollers, over which the block is then rolled so as to form a hollow block. Based on the inclined position of the working rollers, the block is formed so as to form a hollow block via the mandrel, which is arranged in a fixed manner in the rolling gap, and due to the propulsion applied to the block by the inclined position of the working rollers.
During rolling, however, enormous forces are generated that, among other things, push the working rollers apart. The shape of the entire mill stand is extended or otherwise distorted by the forces acting on the working rollers, which ultimately leads to a modification in the previously adjusted rolling gap and its geometry.
Typically, the working rollers, for example the upper and lower working roll, move different distances in different spatial directions. This is all the more true if one or more of the working rollers are firmly connected to the roll stand and/or the foundation, and are therefore only subject to minimal movement under load. In this case, the previously set arrangement of both the working rollers and, if necessary, the mandrel is lost. As a result, the rolling gap increases and the symmetry of the arrangement of the working rollers and, if necessary, the mandrel is shifted relative to each other, in particular since, for example, the upper and lower working rollers are shifted differently, for example upwards or downwards, depending on the design. Ultimately, the center of the working rollers is shifted towards each other and towards the mandrel and thus towards the outlet side of the cross-rolling mill, which leads to undesired effects on the quality of the hollow block produced. In the distribution of the wall thickness of the hollow block, the shifting of the working roller centers relative to each other results in increased eccentricities, which are ultimately still to be found in the finished rolled tube.
Up to now, such disturbance variables could only be determined after the end of the rolling process and compensated for by readjusting the working rollers relative to each other prior to a subsequent rolling process. Dynamic compensation for disturbance variables, in particular compensation for control variables during the rolling process on the basis of measured data determined online, has not been possible until now. The use of hydraulic actuators overcomes this disadvantage of existing cross-rolling mills.
The use of hydraulic actuators, preferably hydraulic capsules, enables the dynamic minimization or complete compensation of the stand expansion and the associated shifting of the roller position relative to each other. In particular, it is made possible for the first time, even under changing load conditions (for example, during rolling), to compensate for the disturbance variables of the rolling gap modifications and rolling gap shifts, preferably in real time, by suitable modifications to the rolling gap, preferably also of the alignment of the rolling axis of at least one of the working rollers with respect to the block or any other working roller, preferably to the greatest possible extent.
The control variables are preferably disturbance variable regulators for the hydraulic actuators of the working rollers, which act in the x-direction transversely to the rolling direction, in the y-direction vertically to the rolling direction and in the z-direction in the rolling direction towards the outlet side.
Preferably, in accordance with the first aspect, the cross-rolling mill has, in addition to the working rollers, preferably the upper and lower working rollers, disks or guide shoes which laterally limit the rolling gap and by means of which a central positioning of the block and the outgoing hollow block within the rolling gap can be influenced. Such so-called “Diescher disks” typically have a circumferential profile in the shape of the hollow block to be rolled, and are arranged within the cross-rolling mill so that they can be adjusted relative to the hollow block. In this connection, it is preferred if the Diescher disks or the guide shoes also have hydraulic adjustment elements that preferably support or can effect a compensation for disturbance variables that acts on a dynamic and online basis.
In a further preferred embodiment of the cross-rolling mill, a measuring device is provided, with which a modification in the rolling gap geometry and/or the rolling gap shift and/or the position of the working rollers in space along with their modification during the rolling operation can be determined. In this connection, it is particularly preferable if such measuring device is connected to an evaluation unit, which is suitable for determining the disturbance variables to be compensated for. This provides a cross-rolling mill that is capable of determining dynamically and permanently preferably any modification in the rolling process, for example on the basis of a stand expansion to be measured and the associated modification in the arrangement of the working rollers and, if necessary, the mandrel relative to each other. In principle, the measuring device can be arranged at any point of the roll stand or its built-in elements, wherein a substantially direct measurement at the working rollers is preferred, while an indirect measurement, for example at a guide element such as a Diescher disk or a guide shoe, nevertheless also permits a conclusion to be drawn regarding the position of the working rollers or the individual guide elements in the roll stand under load by means of a corresponding observation of the correlation.
It is particularly preferable if the measuring device includes an optical image acquisition unit, which makes it possible to separate the measuring unit away from the roll stand and the circumstances that would otherwise act on the measuring unit there and disturb the measuring result. It is particularly preferable if the measuring device includes a camera, preferably a CCD camera. By means of such a camera, the measuring unit in the rolling mill can be positioned almost arbitrarily at the roll stand and at the same time, if necessary after a corresponding calibration, can provide all desired measuring results.
In this connection, it is particularly preferable if the measuring device is capable of recording an image element connected to the roll stand, preferably one or more image elements connected to the actuators for the working rollers, and is then capable of determining their position and/or shape modifications during the rolling process. In this connection, it is particularly preferable if the at least one image element is an active luminous element, which is circular in a highly preferred embodiment of the invention and is formed with a defined diameter or is oval with a defined shape. It is also preferred if the image element is square or rectangular, wherein, in this case, for example, the evaluation of the modification to one or more image element diagonals under load allows an indication of the roll stand expansion or distortion.
On the one hand, this creates the possibility of measuring every roll stand expansion and/or distortion directly and immediately; on the other hand, the design of the image element as an active luminous element advantageously supports image acquisition with particularly simple means. Finally, the preferred design of the image element with a circular shape and defined diameter or oval with a predetermined shape or square or rectangular with known diagonal dimensions, on the one hand, supports the calibration of the measurement with particularly simple means, and on the other hand creates the possibility of recording not only the modification in position of the image element during the roll stand expansion, but also any modification in shape of the image element on the basis of any other type of distortion of the roll stand. This becomes particularly advantageous if the optical image acquisition is able to record not only the center point (in case of a circular shape) or the intersection of the main axes (in case of an oval shape) or the intersection of the diagonals of the surface (in case of a square or rectangular shape) of an image element, but its entire surface, or at least the edge of the image element and its center. The advantage of such measuring method is that it creates the possibility of evaluating many points of the flat image element to determine a single point. This reduces the susceptibility to interference compared to a conventional laser measurement, which only allows a single point to be evaluated. In addition, the surface evaluation allows a one-time calibration of the measuring device independent of its location; the position of the measuring device can thus be freely selected and even modified from one measurement to the next where necessary.
In accordance with a second aspect, a method for producing a hollow block out of a block by means of a cross-rolling mill is provided for rolling a block over a mandrel, particularly preferably a cross-rolling mill according to the first aspect. Hydraulic actuators, preferably hydraulic capsules, which are directly or indirectly connected to the working rollers, for example via roll chocks, modify the rolling gap during the rolling process, preferably also the alignment of the rolling axis of at least one of the working rollers with respect to the block. This provides a method that, for the first time, makes it possible to undertake modifications to the rolling gap geometry during the rolling process, and thus to counteract any disturbance variables determined for the purpose of quality assurance or optimization of the rolling process.
It is particularly preferable if the modification to the rolling gap, as described above, is effected if disturbance variables have been previously determined by an evaluation unit by means of measured modifications to the rolling gap geometry and/or the rolling gap shift and/or the position of the working rollers in space along with their modification during the rolling operation. It is then particularly advantageous to output a signal for compensation of the control variables to the hydraulic actuators in conjunction with a suitable control and regulation unit and the evaluation unit.
In this connection, it is particularly preferable if the evaluation unit is connected to a measuring device, preferably an optical measuring device arranged at a distance from the roll stand, in particular a measuring device with an optical image acquisition unit. In a preferred embodiment, such measuring device can record an image element connected to the roll stand, preferably one or more image elements connected to the actuators for the working rollers, and can determine their position and/or shape modifications during the rolling process. The movement of the image elements is preferably dynamically recorded with high accuracy by means of the optical measuring device, wherein the modifications Δx1(t) and Δy1(t) of the upper working roll or Δx2(t), Δy2(t) of the lower working roll, as the case may be, are preferably determined online and transmitted by means of the evaluation unit to the control and regulation unit for minimizing or compensating for the control variables. Preferably, new control variables for the hydraulic actuators of the upper working roll and/or the lower working roll are then calculated online using suitable algorithms, and the respective roll positions are adjusted in such a manner that the absolute rolling gap error is minimized and the symmetry to the original center can be restored.
This provides a method that allows a very precise and highly dynamic compensation of disturbance variables with means that are simple and interference-immune and accurate and usable online, by which, for the first time, an influence on the currently ongoing rolling operation can be exerted during the rolling process in the cross-rolling mill.
For this purpose, it is also advantageous if, in addition to the position of the working rollers, preferably the upper and/or lower working rollers, also or exclusively the position and/or location of the mandrel as well as, in addition thereto or independently of other modifications, the position and/or location of the Diescher disks in relation to the block or hollow block is dynamically modified, in order to effect or at least support the compensation of previously determined disturbance variables.
As a whole, this enables, in accordance with both of the aspects explained in more detail above, dynamic compensation of the expansion of the rolling mill during rolling and the reduction or elimination of defects in the tube to be produced by the cross-rolling mill. The measured values are preferably recorded without contact and at a distance from the roll stand, thus free from the influences near the rolling gap that disturb the measuring result, and allows the highest possible flexibility in the arrangement of the measuring device to the roll stand depending on local conditions. During the rolling process, movements of the roll stand can be recorded and compensated for during subsequent rolling, if necessary also during the ongoing rolling process. To record the data required for compensation, measurements can be taken at several points at the same time; the measuring device can also be permanently mounted or mobile.
For the measurement, an optical image acquisition system, which uses the CaliView® measuring instrument, can be used in a highly preferred manner. It can measure contours from a distance of 8 m to 40 m with an accuracy of 0.1 mm, wherein CaliView® also has a serial image function for checking the measurement.
The measurement can thus record movements of the roll stand determined during the rolling process and the resulting modifications in the rolling gap and rolling gap geometry, and use them during operation to readjust the working rollers or other control variables. Due to the preferably known shape and dimension of the image element on the roll stand, when the measuring device is arranged in relation to the roll stand, an angular offset can also be provided, which should then be taken into account when calibrating the measuring device. In this manner, the influence of the vapors arising during the cross-rolling process and other influences disturbing the measurement result can be limited to the unavoidable minimum.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2018 003 434 | Apr 2018 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/060458 | 4/24/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/206958 | 10/31/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3492850 | Groppini | Feb 1970 | A |
3845646 | Bellmann et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
4506531 | Sakurada et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4821544 | Tarnier et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5295379 | Trbovich et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
20020000113 | Hoffgen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20070036426 | Kubota et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20140216121 | Haverkamp | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150000363 | Cernuschi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20200065995 | Shivaram et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86103262 | Jan 1987 | CN |
102319739 | Jan 2012 | CN |
103962394 | Aug 2014 | CN |
204486475 | Jul 2015 | CN |
204503779 | Jul 2015 | CN |
104324944 | Oct 2016 | CN |
2156595 | May 1973 | DE |
3530343 | Feb 1987 | DE |
3619412 | Dec 1987 | DE |
19805602 | Aug 1999 | DE |
102005042835 | May 2007 | DE |
102011078623 | Jan 2013 | DE |
102016114337 | Feb 2017 | DE |
102016114377 | Mar 2017 | DE |
1679137 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2590761 | May 2013 | EP |
S60187415 | Sep 1985 | JP |
S60187415 | Sep 1985 | JP |
S60206514 | Oct 1985 | JP |
S60261607 | Dec 1985 | JP |
S613608 | Jan 1986 | JP |
S61209706 | Sep 1986 | JP |
S61276708 | Dec 1986 | JP |
S62173014 | Jul 1987 | JP |
S63289405 | Nov 1988 | JP |
105185117 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H05177221 | Jul 1993 | JP |
2017024038 | Feb 2017 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Isamu, Translation of JPS60187415 (Year: 1985). |
Tomio, Translation of JPS613608 (Year: 1986). |
Tenaris starts advanced seamless pipe production for the demanding US oil and gas industry, Authors: Michael Wilms, Publication data: Mpt. Metallurgical Plant and Plant and Technology International,,Feb. 20, 2018,VERLAG Stahleisen, Duesseldorf, DE, Source info: vol. 1, Nr: 2, pp. 44-47. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210229147 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |