The present disclosure relates to shape memory polymer materials that can be fixed to a temporary or dormant shape under specific conditions of temperature and stress and at a later time, under thermal, electrical and/or environmental stimulus, the associated elastic deformation can be almost completely relaxed to the original, stress free condition. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to crosslinked polycyclooctene (PCO) and blends thereof having excellent shape recovery characteristics and especially a rapid rate of strain recovery. The present disclosure also relates to methods for preparation of the cross-linked polycyclooctene and to applications thereof.
Polymers intrinsically show shape memory effects, e.g., on the basis of rubber elasticity, but with varied characteristics of strain recovery rate, work capability during recovery, and retracted state stability. Among the first shape memory polymers (SMP) reported as such was crosslinked polyethylene, which was discovered and patented in 1971 by Radiation Applications, Inc. and a methacrylic acid ester reported by the Vernon-Benshoff Co. and used as a denture material. However, the mechanism of strain recovery for such materials was immediately identified as far different from that of the shape memory alloys (SMAs), based largely on nickel-titanium alloys.
A shape memory polymer is actually a super-elastic rubber; when the polymer is heated to a rubbery state, it can be deformed under resistance of ˜1 MPa modulus, and when the temperature is decreased below either a crystallization temperature or a glass transition temperature, the deformed shape is fixed by the lower temperature rigidity while, at the same time, the mechanical energy expended on the material during deformation is stored. When the temperature is raised above the transition temperature (Tm or Tg), the polymer will recover to its original form as driven by the restoration of network chain conformational entropy. The advantages of the SMPs will be closely linked to their network architecture and to the sharpness of the transition separating the rigid and rubber states. Compared with SMAs, SMPs have an advantage of high strain (to several hundred percent) because of the large rubbery compliance while the maximum strain of a SMA is less than 8%. An additional benefit of the SMPs is that the transition temperature can be tailored according to the application requirement; e.g., tuning the transition temperature as thermal sensors and the triggered strain recovery above a predetermined temperature, e.g., 37° C. for biomedical applications.
Numerous polymers have been found to have particularly attractive shape memory effect, most notably the polyurethanes, the polynorbornene, styrene-butadiene copolymers, and crosslinked polyethylene.
Block copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and trans-polybutadiene (TPB) with a minor PS content offer an alternative approach to shape memory with a distinct mechanism of strain fixation and recovery triggering. While microphase-separated domains of the PS block are amorphous with Tg˜93° C., the continuous TPB phase is semicrystalline with Tg=−90° C. and Tm=68° C. Due to the immiscibility between PS and TPB blocks below 120° C., the copolymer forms a microdomain structure having elastic rheological characteristics above the TPB melting temperature, with the PS phase serving the role of physical crosslinking. Reversible deformations can therefore be fixed by crystallizing the TPB phase below about T=40° C. and recovered to the stress free state (shape memory) upon heating above 80° C. to melt the TPB phase and free the elastically deformed material to recover strain.
Another known semicrystalline shape memory polymer is trans-polyisoprene (TPI), having Tm=67° C., and degree of crystallinity near 40%, which readily undergoes crosslinking with peroxides. Below the Tm, the crosslinked TPI has a three dimensional network, which is connected by both chemical crosslinks and the crystalline regions. Above the Tm, the crystalline phase melts to become amorphous, with only the chemical crosslinks remaining to maintain the primary shape with a rubber-like modulus. This primary shape is the form of the material at the time of chemical crosslinking by peroxide cure, which normally occurs near T=145° C. for 30 minutes followed by cooling to room temperature, during which time crystallization occurs. As with the PS-TPB block copolymers, elastic deformation of crosslinked TPI can be carried out by heating the polymer above T=80° C. and this deformed secondary shape may be fixed by cooling-induced crystallization. The deformed shape returns to the primary form upon heating above 80° C.
In addition to the foregoing, copolymers of semicrystalline polycaprolactone (PCL) have been investigated as to their SMP characteristics. In particular, polycaprolactone diols have been difunctionalized with methacrylate end-groups and subsequently copolymerized with n-butyl acrylate. The polycaprolactone segments form a crystalline phase that can fix a secondary shape, while thermosetting leads to an elastic network that allows large reversible deformations above Tm. It was found that the PCL molecular weight controls the shape recovery temperature. It is believed that this is due to its influence on the melting transition, while n-butyl acrylate comonomer incorporation yields a softening effect due to the low glass transition temperature of poly (n-butyl acrylate) (Tg=−55° C.). It has been shown that the SMP based on polycaprolactone segments recovered their primary shape at 70° C. within 20 seconds, a relatively slow recovery.
In accordance with the present disclosure, it has been found that chemically cross-linked polycyclooctenes (PCOs) synthesized from cis-cyclooctene have a high trans double bond content. This polymer can be chemically crosslinked with variations in crosslink density to form novel semicrystalline thermoset SMPs. The polymer synthesis is conducted via ring-opening metathesis polymerization of cyclooctene using a dihydroimidazolylidene-modified Grubbs catalyst. The PCO formed is cured by adding dicumyl peroxide to the PCO and the mixture compression molded into a film and further cured through chemical crosslinking upon heating. The effects on the thermal, mechanical, and microstructural properties of the synthesis product depends on the extent of crosslinking.
The advantageous polymers of the present disclosure exhibit excellent shape recovery characteristics and especially a rapid rate of strain recovery. The transition temperature of the PCO is tunable through the change of trans/cis ratio of vinylene groups and blending with miscible rubbers. A soft shape memory behavior is observed, where the primary stress-free shape was recovered within 1 second on immersion in hot water above the melting point of the crystalline PCO phase. In contrast with glassy shape memory polymers, chemically crosslinked PCO behaves as an elastomer capable of arbitrary shaping above the sharp melting temperature of the PCO crystalline phase and subsequent shape fixing during crystallization. The shape memory polymers of the present disclosure exhibit excellent shape recovery effect with the recovery temperature and retracting force being adjustable from 20° C. to 60° C. according to the ratio of the tacticity used, the degree of curing and the thermal properties of the blended components. The recovery can be finished within 1 second when heated 20° C. above the transition temperature. Additional advantages of the SMPs include that the materials are flexible at room temperature, the flexibility can be tailored according to application requirements by blending with either rigid particulate filler or soft polymeric rubber, they can be dyed to any color according to application requirements, and an optical clearing transition may accompany triggered strain recovery.
The present disclosure also includes shape memory polymers formed by blending the disclosed PCOs with other exemplary polymer materials, e.g., styrene-butadiene rubber, ethylene propylene-diene (EPDM) rubber, natural rubber (cis-polyisoprene), poly(ethylene-co vinyl acetate) (EVA), polydimethylsiloxane (silicone), and polyurethane polymers.
The PCOs and the blends of the present disclosure may be successfully used in connection with a wide variety of applications including, without limitation, the following applications:
To illustrate advantageous features, functions and uses of exemplary polymers according to the present disclosure, the following non-limiting examples are provided. As will be readily apparent to persons of skill in the art, the following examples are merely illustrative of aspects of the present disclosure, and should not be viewed as absolute and thus should not be considered to be limiting with respect to potential polymeric materials, processing conditions (e.g., relative percentages, temperatures and time periods) and/or end-use applications that may be advantageously employed according to the present disclosure. Physical properties and processing conditions set forth in the following examples are merely illustrative of such properties/conditions, and should not be viewed as limiting the scope or utility of the present disclosure.
Materials and Synthesis.
The ruthenium catalysts bis(tricyclohexylphosphine)benzylidene ruthenium (IV) dichloride (1, Grubbs' catalyst) and tricyclohexylphosphine [1,3-bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-4,5-dihydroimidazol-2-ylidene] [benzylidene] ruthenium (IV) dichloride (2) were purchased from Strem Chemical. The other reagents were obtained from Aldrich and used as received unless otherwise indicated. The cis-cyclooctene was vacuum distilled from CaH2 prior to use and the methylene chloride was passed through columns of basic activated alumina prior to use.
To a solution of 5.1 mg (6.0 μmol) of the ruthenium catalyst 2 in 50 mL of CH2Cl2, there was added 6.60 g (60 mmol) cis-cyclooctene. The resulting reaction mixture was stirred under air for 30 minutes at room temperature during which time the mixture gelled. The reaction was stopped by injection of 50 mL CH2Cl2 containing a trace amount of ethyl vinyl ether. The polymer was precipitated using methanol, recovered by filtration and dried overnight under vacuum at room temperature. The isolated yield amounted to 5.0 g (75%). The 13C NMR spectra of the sample were recorded in chloroform-d on a Bruker DPX-300 FT NMR spectrometer operating at 75 MHz. Quantitative spectra were obtained using a standard inverse-gated proton decoupling pulse sequence and a relaxation delay of 2 seconds to obtain trans/cis ratios. Gel permeation chromatography was carried out using a Polymer Lab LC1120 HPLC pump equipped with a Waters differential refractometer detector. The mobile phase was tetrahydrofuran (THF) and a flow rate of 1 mL/minute was employed. Separations were carried out using a set of 105 Å, 104 Å and 103 Å Polymer Lab columns. Molecular weights were calibrated against narrow molecular weight polystyrene standards.
The PCO peroxide curing was carried out by dissolving PCO and dicumyl peroxide in CHCl3, to form a clear solution. The solution was dried in a fume hood at room temperature for 12 hours and vacuum dried in an oven at 40° C. for 12 hours. Dried PCO containing DCP was transferred to a mold having the following dimensions 1×3×0.05 cm. The mold was placed between two hot platens and compressed at 140° C. under a pressure of 1000 psi for 30 minutes to yield a sheet specimen. After curing, the specimen was cooled to room temperature in the mold.
The polymer blends were achieved via the melt blending within a twin screw Brabender. The Brabender which had 30 ml chamber was first heated to 80° C. (Tm+20° C.) and the speed was adjusted to 25 RPM. The feed (polymers to be blended) was premixed and fed into the chamber within 2 minutes and mixed therein at 25 RPM for 10 minutes. The resulting mixture was removed and cooled to room temperature under air. The mixture was then introduced between two plates that that had been preheated to 180° C., pressed to form a film and cured for 30 minutes. Two Mylar films were used to separate the polymers from the stainless plates to avoid the film sticking on the plates after curing. The thickness of the samples was controlled by a spacer, which also served as a sealer.
The thermal properties (melting and crystallization temperatures) of cured PCO were measured using a Perkin-Elmer differential scanning calorimeter (DSC-7) using a first heating rate of 10° C./minute from −50 to 100° C., a first cooling rate of −10° C./minute from 100° C. to −50° C., and a second heating rate of 10° C./min from −50 to 100° C.
Wide-angle x-ray scattering (WAXS) analysis was performed using a BRUKER GADDS-4 instrument having a Cr source of radiation (λ=2.291 Å) and the transmission mode was chosen. The voltage and the current used were 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively, and the exposure time was 30 minutes. The scattering patterns were collected on a HiStar area detector with the distance of the sample to detector set to 6.0 cm. Intensity profiles (I vs. 2θ) were determined from azimuthal averaging at each 2θ position of the isotropic patterns. The data were then analyzed with Peakfit™ software (SPSS Science) to find the peak positions and the relative intensity of each peak.
Dynamic mechanical analysis was carried out with a TA Instruments DMA 2980 run in tensile mode at an oscillation frequency of 1 Hz, a static force of 10 mN, an oscillation amplitude of 5.0 μm (˜0.1% strain), and an automatic tension setting of 125%. Temperature ramps were conducted at 4° C./minute over the range −100<T<100° C.
The shape memory effect was then determined. PCO samples having varying crosslinking degrees were cut into rectangular strips of 0.5×2.0×30.0 mm and colored with red dye to provide optical contrast. The PCO strips were bent in semi-circular shape with an inner diameter of 0.737 cm in a warm water bath at 70° C. (at which temperature the samples were transparent and flexible) and then transferred into an ice water bath to fix the secondary bent shape by crystallization. The bent PCO samples were then promptly dipped into the warm water bath at 70° C., while recording images of shape recovery using a video camera at a rate of 20 frames per second. The variations of radius of curvature of the bent samples were analyzed using non-linear regression (Sigmplot™).
It was further established using the foregoing synthesis techniques that polycyclooctene (PCO) can be synthesized using either RuCl2(═CHPh)(PCy3)2 1 (Grubbs catalyst) or the dihydroimidazolylidene modified Grubbs catalyst 2, but with catalyst 2 having a much higher reactivity as compared with catalyst 1. A unique feature of PCO as a shape memory material is the tunable transition temperature (Tm of PCO), where a temperature range from 19 to 61° C. is achievable following the dependence of the melting point of PCO on the trans content of double bonds along the polymer backbone. The synthesis procedure of the invention has the ability to control the trans/cis ratio as well as molecular weight by changing conditions: reaction time, catalyst type, and catalyst concentration. Table 1 which follows shows representative examples of PCO variations achieved in this manner.
aMonomer concentration 1.2 M.
bData are gathered on the second melt scan with 10° C./min cooling history.
As can be appreciated from Table 1, higher catalyst concentrations result in higher trans concentration and lower molecular weights (sample 2 and 3 vs. 1). Additionally, prolonged reaction times (sample 4 vs. 2) or the use of highly reactive catalyst 2 (sample 5) yield higher melting temperature products, presumably as a consequence of more cross-metathesis occurring between polymer chains resulting in the thermodynamically more favorable trans products.
Sample 5 (PCO5 above) was selected for in-depth characterization, based upon its desirable melt transition temperature and molecular weight.
Thermal Analysis.
DSC analysis was conducted for the first heating and cooling of cured PCOs prepared using varying concentration (wt. %) of peroxide: (i) DCP 0%, (ii) DCP 1%, (iii) DCP 2.5%, (iv) DCP 5%, and (v) DCP10% to reveal its melting and crystallization behavior. The neat PCO was compression molded in a hot press using the same conditions as for crosslinked PCO to provide an identical thermal history. During the first heating cycle, neat PCO shows a melting temperature at 60.3° C. while any glass transition for neat PCO was not detected over the range −50<T<100° C. According to Calderon and Morris, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 1967, 5, 1283-1292, the crystalline melting point for PCO depends linearly on the percentage of trans-vinylene content in the polymer; specifically, Tm=60° C. was reported for 78% trans-vinylene content in PCO. For the neat PCO sample described herein, the content of trans-vinylene is 80.6%, so that the measured melting transition of 60.3° C. is in good agreement with the prior literature Calderon and Morris, supra. During the first cooling cycle, neat PCO shows a crystallization exotherm at 37° C. A second heating cycle shows the same result as the first heating cycle.
Crosslinking PCO with dicumyl peroxide has a dramatic impact on its crystallization and melting behavior. The melting point, Tm, the crystallization point, Tc, and the melting enthalpy (related to degree of crystallinity), ΔH, are plotted in
A significant effect of the degree of crosslinking is observed: both the Tm and Tc of PCO decrease as the amount of DCP increases, the former by more than 40° C. for 10% DCP crosslinking. The melting enthalpy also decreases with increased crosslinking, indicating a decrease in degree of crystallinity. When the temperature is decreased below Tc, the constituent PCO chains begin to crystallize, the crystals growing to a certain final size and shape. In the case of neat PCO (without cross-linking points), relatively low restriction for PCO crystal growth due to high polymer chain mobility results is to be expected. However, for the samples of increasing crosslink density, the polymer chains are constrained against diffusion and conformational rearrangement, thus increasingly restricting crystallization. As a result, higher peroxide loadings give rise to a reduced degree of crystallinity and concomitant reduction of crystal size, the latter inferred from the observed depression in melting temperature. It can also be seen from Table 2 that the melting temperature of cured PCO can be tailored by controlling the loading of peroxide before curing. Moreover, when the amount of peroxide exceeds 10%, the cured PCO shape memory behavior is lost as both the Tm and Tc are below room temperature and the melting transition is broadened excessively.
Crystalline Microstructure.
The underlying microstructure of PCO as affected by crosslinking was determined using wide-angle x-ray scattering (WAXS). From the intensity profiles of all PCO samples except the PCO5-10, it was found that the microstructure is characterized by the superposition of an amorphous halo and four crystalline diffraction rings of nearly constant d-spacing, but with intensity that decreases with increasing extent of crosslinking. For example, PCO cured with 1 wt-% dicumyl peroxide shows two strong scattering peaks at 2θ=30.02° (4.42 Å) and 34.81° (3.83 Å) that correspond to the 010 and 100/110 reflections of the PCO triclinic crystal structure, respectively. Additionally there are two weak peaks, 2θ=31.94° (4.16 Å) and 2θ=36.97° (3.61 Å) corresponding, respectively to the 110 and 201 reflections of the PCO monoclinic crystal structure.
The WAXS patterns were analyzed to deconvolute the constituent reflections using Peakfit™ software. The data obtained are summarized in Table 3, which follows along with a summary of DMA vide infra.
From the fitted data, it was found that the degree of crystallinity of PCO is 25.5% at room temperature, which is close to the results from DSC (28.8%) employing the enthalpy data of a pure crystal (216 J/g) from Schneider and Muller Journal of Molecular Catalysis 1988, 46, 395-403. Additionally, the degree of crystallinity shows a monotonic decrease with increasing crosslinking, the same trend observed with DSC and also explained by a constraining effect of crosslinking points that limit the growth of crystals. In fact, sample PCO5-10 (10% DCP crosslinking) did not show significant crystallinity at room temperature; however, this does not mean that the sample cannot crystallize. From the DSC data, it can be concluded that a crystalline phase of PCO5-10 melts over the range −15<T<30° C., while the WAXS analysis was conducted at room temperature (28° C.). At this temperature the melting is nearly complete, yielding a measured degree of crystallinity of only 2.6%.
In analyzing the scattering patterns for the area % of each peak, it was found that the effect of crosslinking-confinement on the degree of crystallinity depends on the associated crystal structure. While the triclinic peaks at 30.02 and 34.8 degrees 2θ decrease linearly with crosslinking, the monoclinic peaks at 31.9 and 36.97 degrees 2θ seem almost unaffected by the crosslinking. It is thus apparent that the triclinic crystal structure is more sensitive to the constraining influence of cross-linking, while the monoclinic crystal structure is more robust, although still a minor component.
Dynamic Mechanical Properties.
Chemically crosslinking PCO also has a direct impact on the thermomechanical properties, e.g. modulus versus temperature, through the establishment of a permanent network and indirectly through the morphological transitions discussed above. Revealing such effects by the use of DMA,
From each of the curves in
It was observed that the trend of the in thermomechanical behavior corresponds favorably with WAXS observations discussed above. In particular, it was found that the room temperature modulus decreases with increasing of crosslinking, just as the degree of crystallinity is decreasing as reported in Table 3.
Shape Memory Effect.
A typical example of the shape-memory effect of PCO cured with 2.5 wt % DCP (PCO5-2.5) is shown in
In order to quantitatively evaluate the transition speed, the time evolution of curvature (κ=1/r, r=radius of circle superposing the curved film) for the recovering samples was determined by image processing and plotted versus time as shown in
In accordance with the invention, PCO polymers have been prepared with control over the cis/trans double bond composition and molecular weight afforded by the use of ruthenium catalysts. Samples of the polymers were cured using dicumyl peroxide of varying concentration and the influence of crosslinking on thermal, microstructural, and thermomechanical properties determined. In addition, the dependence of desirable shape memory characteristics on degree of crosslinking was investigated, revealing competing influences of crystallinity for shape-fixing, seen to decrease with crosslinking, and rubber elasticity above Tm, observed to increase with crosslinking as expected. While neat, linear, PCO does not exhibit shape memory effect due to the lack of a rubbery plateau above melt transition temperature, a small amount of peroxide crosslinking (˜1%) imparts shape memory effect to PCO. A fast shape memory effect was observed for the crosslinked PCO that results when crystallization-fixed distorted samples were submerged in a warm water bath. In the case of PCO containing either 2.5 or 5% peroxide, complete shape recovery from a curvature, κ=0.14 mm−1 to zero curvature occurs within 0.7 s at 70° C.
Various blends of PCO and other polymers including styrene butadiene, EVA and polyurethane using different ratios of the polymers in the blends were prepared and evaluated for isothermal characterization of the stiffness, thermomechanical melting and other properties per se and in comparison with PCO, EVA, SBR, polyurethane in unblended form.
Modification of the Isothermal Stiffness on Blending with Styrene-butadiene Soft Rubber
The storage moduli of the PCO blends using different ratios of SBR were determined and compared using the temperature-ramp and isothermal procedures. The results are shown in
Modification of the Body-temperature Stiffness and Also the Transition Temperatures by Blending with Compatible Components.
PCO was blended with other components, including Vestenamer 6213, a PCO with different tacticity which has lower trans-content so that it decreases the melting temperature to below that of Vestenamer and EVA. Both components were compatible with PCO-8012 acted to lower the melting temperatures significantly, both from DMTA results (
In addition to SBR, EVA and other PCO starting materials, shape memory polymers were prepared using various rubbery polyurethanes as the second material in the blend with similar results.
Also in accordance with the present disclosure, the body-temperature modulus of crosslinked PCO materials may be substantially increased through the addition of inorganic or organic filler powders. As an example, PCO (Vestenamer 8012®) was blended with different amounts of boron nitride (Advanced Ceramics, PT-140). Blending was conducted at T=80° C. for 10 minutes to ensure full mixing using a twin screw Brabender® mixer having a chamber volume of 30 ml. The rotating speed of the screws was set to 25 rpm. The materials were quite easily blended even at 30 wt % of the solid filler a finding attributed to the low viscosity of PCO, a processing aide itself. It is believed that a higher filler content (up to 50%) may be feasible for this system. The crosslinking agent used is dicumyl peroxide and the amount is 1 wt-PHR based on the amount of PCO added and not the PCO plus BN. The compounded materials were pressed and thermally cured in a heat press at 180° C. for 10 minutes under a load of 8 metric tons. The resulting films were smooth and egg-shell white in color. Shape memory tests in hot water (˜80° C.) show fast and complete recovery.
Fillers of exceptionally high thermal conductivity, such as boron nitride, are expected to improve the rate of shape recovery in the shape memory effect by decreasing the time for the article to reach thermal homogeneity.
Thus, the present disclosure provides an advantageous shape memory polymer that includes chemically cross-linked polycyclooctene synthesized from cis-cyclooctene having a high trans double bond content. The present disclosure further provides an advantageous method of forming a shape memory polymer that includes conducting a ring opening metathesis polymerization of cis-cyclooctene in the presence of a Grubbs catalyst and reacting the polycyclooctene formed with dicumyl peroxide at an elevated temperature to cure the polycyclooctene.
Although the polymers and processing methodologies of the present disclosure have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof, the present disclosure is not to be limited to such exemplary embodiments. Rather, as will be readily apparent to persons skilled in the art, the teachings of the present disclosure are susceptible to many implementations and/or applications, without departing from either the spirit or the scope of the present disclosure. Indeed, modifications and/or changes in the selection of specific polymers, polymer ratios, processing conditions, and end-use applications are contemplated hereby, and such modifications and/or changes are encompassed within the scope of the present invention as set forth by the claims which follow.
This application is a division of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/651,276, filed Jan. 9, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,563,848 B2 which is a division of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/683,559, filed Oct. 10, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,173,096 B2 which in turn claims priority to the following provisional patent applications: Ser. No. 60/418,023, filed Oct. 11, 2002; Ser. No. 60/419,506, filed Oct. 18, 2002; and Ser. No. 60/488,323, filed Jul. 18, 2003. Each of the foregoing patent applications is incorporated herein by reference to the extent not inconsistent with present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3383336 | Kuyama et al. | May 1968 | A |
3459725 | Natta et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3563973 | Arditti et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
4612241 | Howard, Jr. | Sep 1986 | A |
4755552 | Jadamus et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5145935 | Hayashi | Sep 1992 | A |
5147385 | Beck et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163952 | Froix | Nov 1992 | A |
5189110 | Ikematu et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5258020 | Froix | Nov 1993 | A |
5278237 | Kita | Jan 1994 | A |
5282854 | Yagi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5395882 | Siol et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5461114 | Kita | Oct 1995 | A |
5506300 | Ward et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5607467 | Froix | Mar 1997 | A |
5665822 | Bitler et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674242 | Phan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5728785 | Grubbs et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5769883 | Buscemi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5880240 | Tsuno | Mar 1999 | A |
5889118 | Delgado et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5908918 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5910357 | Hachisuka et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5954744 | Phan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964744 | Balbierz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6024764 | Schroeppel | Feb 2000 | A |
6086204 | Magnante | Jul 2000 | A |
6156842 | Hoenig et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160084 | Langer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6217609 | Haverkost | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248129 | Froix | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6368346 | Jadhav | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388043 | Langer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6395038 | Schroeppel | May 2002 | B1 |
6530950 | Alvarado et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538089 | Samra et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6679605 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6713154 | Tsunogae et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6720402 | Langer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6852825 | Lendlein et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858680 | Gunatillake et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7173096 | Mather et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7563848 | Mather | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015519 | Tokas et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020137864 | Tong | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030060530 | Topolkaraev et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060793 | Topolkaraev et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030114777 | Griffin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030147046 | Shadduck | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030191276 | Lendlein et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040014929 | Lendlein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015187 | Lendlein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015261 | Hofmann et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024143 | Lendlein et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030062 | Mather et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040100704 | Shadduck | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116641 | Mather et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122174 | Mather et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050010275 | Sahatjian et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050216074 | Sahatjian et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245719 | Mather et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060041089 | Mather et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0343442 | May 1989 | EP |
0385443 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0368274 | May 1990 | EP |
404004 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0422693 | Feb 1991 | EP |
1000958 | Nov 1998 | EP |
WO 9414890 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9526762 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9942147 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9942528 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9946327 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0010485 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0071554 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0107499 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0191822 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0239875 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 02059170 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02083786 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03035743 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03084490 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03084491 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088818 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03093341 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006885 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004011525 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004032799 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004033515 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004033539 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004033553 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2005009523 | Feb 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090275704 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60418023 | Oct 2002 | US | |
60419506 | Oct 2002 | US | |
60488323 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11651276 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 12480957 | US | |
Parent | 10683559 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11651276 | US |