This invention relates to archery and more particularly to a molded aerodynamically crosswind resistant fletching construction to counter the effects of crosswind on arrows and bolts.
Molded fletchings are common in the archery industry and have been applied to both arrows and bolts for bow hunting. One such molded configuration is available from Outer Limit which provides pre-molded fletchings around a cylindrical carrier which is slipped over the arrow shaft. It is noted that the goal of the fletching is to produce sufficient drag to be able to stabilize the arrow in flight and to be able to control the proper amount of spin of the arrow. Note that the fletchings must be of a sufficient size to produce sufficient drag. The fletchings can also be angled with respect to the center line of the arrow shaft to be able to produce the desired amount of spin. Normally three straight pieces of plastic are used as fletchings mounted on a cylindrical carrier.
Whether the fletchings are mounted aligned with the center line of the arrow shaft or are canted to provide a rotation of the arrow in flight, when there is a crosswind, the trajectory of the arrow is such that the arrow does not go in the direction that it is originally aimed. When the wind catches these fletchings from the side the arrow is deflected off course. Most importantly, what can happen is that the arrow spin can stall. Thus the crosswind can actually stop the arrow from spinning. Moreover the force of the crosswind pushing on the arrow sideways causes the arrow to fly off course and miss the target. Thus the aerodynamic properties of straight molded fletchings are such as to be particularly sensitive to crosswinds.
Molded fletchings are provided in pairs about a central shaft, with the outward tips of the pair of the fletchings bowed inwardly so as to present a minimal area to crosswinds rather than catching the fletchings from the side. The result is that the crosswinds flow over the bowed-in tips of the fletchings resulting in minimum sideways thrust.
It will be noted that the aerodynamics of the fletchings are critical to the performance of an arrow as it flies through the air. The two most important aerodynamic characteristics are the drag and the spin created by the fletching. An appropriate amount of drag is desirable in order to create sufficient flight stabilization so that the arrow remains pointed forward during flight. This is ensured by having fletchings near the trailing end of the arrow that drag as they fly through the air, resulting in a force pulling backward on the trailing end of the arrow, and therefore keeping it oriented correctly. Too much drag is not desirable because that will result in excess air resistance and increased drop of the arrow trajectory as it flies toward its intended target.
The drag created by the fletchings are the result of two phenomena:
First, skin friction from air flowing over the surfaces of the fletchings viscously creates a drag force on those surfaces. This is largely a function of the surface roughness and surface area of the fletchings.
Secondly, drag pressure results from the high pressure at the leading edges of the fletchings, and low pressure areas at the trailing edges of the fletching surfaces.
It has been found that by having six vanes, it is possible to create an increased amount of drag when compared with conventional fletchings that only have three fletching “wings”. Therefore, it is possible to create the desired amount of drag with less volume taken up by the fletchings. This reduces the size of fletchings necessary, and therefore reduces the effect of a side wind pushing sideways on the fletchings.
As to stabilization; spin stabilization is a well-documented phenomena and is demonstrated commonly in things such as bicycle tires and bullet trajectories. Arrows are similarly spin stabilized by controlling the amount of spin caused by the fletchings. Spin is primarily created in two ways from the design of the subject fletchings.
As viewed from a side view of the fletchings, looking radially inward at the system, the fletchings are molded so that they create a spiral pattern axially down the arrow shaft that induces spin as the arrow flies through the air.
This being said, if the fletchings are molded such that they are produced as a sheet having rounded edges on the tip of the fletchings, crosswind is directed across the fletchings as opposed to catching the side of the fletching. It therefore flows over the fletchings when the wind comes from the side, thus minimizing trajectory drift.
Note there is very little air flow in the valley between the pairs of fletchings. Tests have shown that when the subject configuration is used, crosswinds of up to 20 miles per hour do not noticeably impact the trajectory of the arrows.
In a preferred embodiment the pairs of fletchings are bowed inwardly such that wind coming from any direction flows around rather than catching on the fletching. This is quite unlike the current straight fletching designs. Note that the fletchings can be aligned along the longitudinal axis of the arrow at which point the arrow does not naturally spin, whereas the fletchings may be spirally configured along the arrow shaft and angled with respect to the longitudinal axis of the arrow such that the arrow spirals through the air. While the subject fletchings have been designed to spiral through the air it is the ability to deflect crosswind that is critical to the present invention.
In one embodiment pairs of fletchings are arranged around a cylindrical carrier such that three pairs of fletchings are provided for a total of six fletchings. Each pair of fletchings is designed to work in tandem with each other to direct crosswind over the fletchings.
The feature of the fletchings that allow it to drag air flow over the tips of the fletching is due to the curved outer tip of the fletchings which have a radius. When the crosswind impacts the top of the fletching what normally happens with traditional fletchings is that wind strikes the fletching with sufficient force to begin pushing the fletching to the lee side of the wind.
On the other hand the subject fletching design with the tips bowed inwardly tends to direct the air flow around and over the fletching as opposed to impacting its sides. Therefore side drag force is significantly less and the fletchings reduce the side forces.
In one embodiment each of the fletchings has a humped central region which serves to create more of an air flow shape to create more spin on the fletching. This is because the hump is in essence in the direction of rotation.
The so-called hump in the middle of the fletching is also to provide structural rigidity. Also, when the fletchings are two part fletchings as might be the case when utilizing a light lighted nock with an opaque forward portion and a transparent rear portion, the humps provide internal channels within the fletching so as to be able to attach a rearward portion of a fletching to the forward portion by means of forward facing prongs on the rearward portion.
By reducing the amount of side wind caught by the fletchings, the rotational spin of the arrow is largely unaffected. Note, traditionally fletched arrows see a marked decrease in spin in a side wind to the point that their rotation may stop completely. However, the subject fletchings in molded pairs direct the air flow over their shape which has shown virtually no reduction in rotational velocity at all. By maintaining a more stable spin rate when compared with traditional fletchings, the arrow spin stabilization is greatly improved with less variability.
In summary, it has been found that by locating pairs of fletchings about a central shaft and by having the tips of opposed fletchings directed inwardly, the effect of crosswinds is minimized as the crosswinds will tend to go up and over the fletchings as opposed to catching the fletchings. The result is that the trajectory of the arrow or bolt is not affected by crosswinds up to as much as 20 miles per hour.
These and other features of the subject invention will be better understood in connection with the Detailed Description, in conjunction with the Drawings, of which:
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
This rotation is shown in
The net result is a molded fletching configuration with inwardly bowed tips for pairs of fletchings which causes crosswinds, rather than catching the fletching, to be diverted across the fletchings, therefore only minimally impacting the arrow or bolt trajectory or rotational velocity.
Referring now to
This isometric drawing shows the spiraling of the fletchings in a clockwise direction around center line 19, with the spiraled configuration providing for arrow rotation as the arrow flies through the air.
Referring now to
When used with a lighted nock, light from the nock is injected into the fletching where it is injected by the parabolic interface 62 back out the arrow. Stray light in the transparent portion makes this portion of the fletching glow such that a hunter can easily locate the arrow.
While the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications or additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function of the present invention without deviating therefrom. For example, three pairs of fletchings have been shown in the figures, but other numbers of fletching pairs could also be used without deviating from the present invention. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the recitation of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2796262 | Folberth, Jr. | Jun 1957 | A |
4003576 | Carella | Jan 1977 | A |
4468189 | Carella | Aug 1984 | A |
4488728 | Humphrey | Dec 1984 | A |
5423553 | Krieg | Jun 1995 | A |
5613688 | Carella | Mar 1997 | A |
6958023 | Simo et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7485057 | Afshari | Feb 2009 | B2 |
8105189 | Huang | Jan 2012 | B1 |
20030045381 | Morris et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2014/059732, Jan. 5, 2015. |
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for PCT/US2014/059732, Jan. 5, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150105193 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |