This U.S. application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 371 to, and is a U.S. National Phase application of, the international Patent Application No. PCT/FI2014/050387, filed 21 May 2014 which claims priority from Finnish Patent Application No. U20134123 flied on 22 May 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated in their entirety by reference herein.
The invention relates to a crusher that comprises a box-like frame with two end walls and two side walls connecting the end walls; at least one crusher rotor that is supported for a rotating movement inside the crusher frame against its end walls; the circumference of the crusher rotor having a plurality of crusher teeth, and the crusher having counter-blade structures arranged to cooperate with the crusher teeth of the crusher rotor, and the material fed into the crusher for crushing being intended to be fed essentially above the centre line of the rotor(s) and to be crushed between the crusher teeth and the counter-blade structures of the crusher rotor. Typically, the present crusher comprises two parallel crusher rotors, even though nothing prevents using a one-rotor crusher.
On the basis of their running speed, crushers may be divided into two categories: fast- and slow-running crushers. Fast-running crushers are efficient, but they require that the material being crushed be free from impurities, because, due to a high circumferential velocity of the crusher rotor, their structures cannot be protected by automatically released safety means. Additional problems include fire hazard and noise and dust problems, among others.
Slow-running crushers are considerably better suited for a wider range of material to be crushed, and they also tolerate impurities. Due to a slow circumferential velocity, their capacities remain low. An increase in the circumferential velocity implies an increased risk of crusher damage, and attempts have been made to prevent this by structures whose counter-blades give way, when foreign objects that are typically of metal are caught between the crusher teeth and the counter-blade structure.
However, the above manner of preventing damage to the crusher leads to expensive solutions and, therefore, in crushers of a lower price category the damage is avoided by limiting the kinetic energy of the crusher rotor to an as low a level as possible and by making the structures strong enough to endure a sudden stop. Generally, crushers have built-in automatics, with which the rotation direction of the crusher rotor is reversed and a new crushing attempt made. There may be several of these repetitions, but finally, when an object not suitable for crushing has ended up among the material being crushed, the crusher stops and raises an alarm. After this, the foreign object is removed manually.
Solutions are known, in which the front wall of the crusher is opened around a joint in the bottom or top part of the wall, and a foreign object can be removed through the opening. In these solutions, the view to the crusher rotors often remains so narrow that it is difficult to remove a foreign object through them and the opening also cannot be utilised during maintenance, such as during the replacement of the crusher rotor.
Structures are also known, in which the entire side wall can be slid upward by means of a chain hoist. In this solution, like in the one mentioned earlier, a big drawback is that, when stopping occurs at a time, when the crusher and the feeding funnel for material to be crushed on top of it are still full of material, the material to be crushed discharges through the opening and causes various problems to the environment.
The following publications, among others, represent the prior art: US 2010252670 A1, EP 2042238 A1, DE 102006050051 A1, US 200686850 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 7,222,805 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,743,472 A, GB 2278788 A, U.S. Pat. No. 5,248,100 A, EP 458059 A1, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,385,732 A.
The object of the invention is to develop the crusher of the type described in the beginning in such a manner that the aforementioned problems will be solved. This object is achieved by a crusher of the invention that is characterised in that two hatches are arranged on at least one side wall side of the crusher, the first hatch being above the centre line of the crusher rotor and pivoted at its top part to the crusher to be turnable toward the centre line of the crusher, and the second hatch being mainly below the centre line of the crusher rotor and movable away from the front of the crusher rotor. Preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the dependent claims.
Thus, in the invention, there are two separate doors or hatches that are hinged to the crusher, for instance, and that may operate independent of each other. The structure prevents extra material from flowing out of the crusher and permits an easier and more hygienic removal of a foreign object. The idea of the invention is that when the upper hatch opens inward, it prevents the crusher rotor and any material still in the feeding funnel from flowing out of the crusher, whereas foreign objects are easily removed through the lower hatch that opens or slides away from the rotor.
The invention will now be described in more detail in light of three preferred embodiments and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
Firstly,
The crusher rotor 4 may rotate mainly in one direction only, in which case the crushing of the material F takes place against either of the counter-blade structures 6 or 7. Crushing may also take place as the crusher rotor 4 rotates in either direction, in which case crushing is done against both counter-blade structures 6 and 7.
Two hatches 8 and 9 are arranged on the side of each side wall 3 of the crusher, the first hatch 8 being above the centre line of the crusher rotor 4 and pivoted by joints 11 at its top part to the end walls 2 of the crusher to be turnable toward the centre line of the crusher, and the second hatch 9 being mainly below the centre line of the crusher rotor 4 and pivoted at its bottom part by joints 12 to the end walls 2 of the crusher to be turnable away from the crusher rotor 4. The ends of the first and second hatches 8 and 9 facing each other engage in the closed position. In this exemplary implementation, the lower, second hatch 9 comprises a second counter-blade structure 7.
The structure of
When a hard object that is typically of metal enters between the crusher rotor 4, its crusher teeth 5 and counter-blade structure 6, 7, the crusher rotor 4 stops and raises an alarm. In cases, where the crushing does not take place against the counter-blades 7 on the top hatch 8, the removal of foreign objects is started by rotating the crusher rotor 4 in the opposite direction, in which case the foreign object comes close to the lower hatch 9, 9′ that can be opened. The upper hatch 8 is then turned inward toward the centre of the crusher, in which case the material to be crushed on top of the crusher rotor 4 moves toward the centre of the crusher and is prevented from flowing out. Next, the lower hatch 9, 9′ is opened to gain clear access to the crusher rotor 4 and the foreign object can easily be removed.
The above description of the invention is only intended to illustrate the basic idea of the invention. A person skilled in the art may thus vary its details within the scope of the attached claims. Therefore, the lower, second hatch may also be a hatch that can be slid away from the front of the crusher rotor. The hatch structure may also be on only one side of the crusher, or there may be differing hatch structures on the opposite sides of the crusher. The hatch structures may also form part of the side walls.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20134123 U | May 2013 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2014/050387 | 5/21/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/188069 | 11/27/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1472609 | Martin | Oct 1923 | A |
2149571 | Battey | Mar 1939 | A |
2705596 | Poyser | Apr 1955 | A |
3343800 | Rasmussen | Sep 1967 | A |
3602444 | Meyer | Aug 1971 | A |
3659792 | Von Conrad | May 1972 | A |
4767066 | Williams | Aug 1988 | A |
4905919 | Okazaki | Mar 1990 | A |
5244158 | Popovich | Sep 1993 | A |
5484110 | Doppstadt | Jan 1996 | A |
5513811 | Phan Hung | May 1996 | A |
5562257 | Graveman | Oct 1996 | A |
5697562 | Leblond | Dec 1997 | A |
6845931 | Smith | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7832668 | Gassmann | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20080185466 | Howard | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201711183 | Jan 2011 | CN |
102179274 | Sep 2011 | CN |
1371420 | Dec 2003 | EP |
WO 2012131162 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Office Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 for EP Application No. 14801533.2. |
espacenet English abstract of DE 10 2010 031 685 A1. |
Non-English Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201480029185.7 with English translation. |
espacenet English abstract of CN 201711183 U. |
espacenet English abstract of CN 102179274 A. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160074867 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |