Carbon dioxide emissions, particularly from the combustion of fossil fuels and other industrial processes have been identified as potential contributors to environmental issues ranging from local pollution to global climate change. Thus, over the years, various efforts to mitigate and re-capture these emissions have been identified and attempted. For larger industrial processes, particularly where a flue is utilized to facilitate emissions, these efforts may include absorption with amines, adsorption, the use of membranes, calcium looping, biological-focused efforts and even cryogenic efforts.
Cryogenic carbon dioxide capture efforts have proven promising. However, given that efforts are directed at a stream of flue gas, such as through a flue, this means that a flue channel with physical inner walls is exposed to the stream throughout the process. So, for example, cryogenically cooling the flue gas means that the carbon dioxide within the stream will begin to condense as a solid below the triple point pressures and temperatures of about 5.17 bara and −56.56° C. This effectively facilitates a transition of the carbon dioxide from a gas to a solid state as dry ice. In theory, and in practice, this renders separation and collection of the carbon dioxide from the stream of flue gas as a practical undertaking.
Unfortunately, the described process involves a form of carbon dioxide condensation wherein the dry ice tends to accumulate at the inner walls of the flue. Further, even where other equipment is utilized, such as directing the stream of flue gas through heat exchangers or other equipment still renders a gas stream where condensing carbon dioxide has a tendency to accumulate at sidewalls of the channel utilized to direct the stream. This leads to clogging of the flue or other equipment which then requires system shutdown, maintenance and considerable expense along with loss of production time. Furthermore, utilizing more complex equipment or techniques that are not standard industry practice, may also present a variety of cost and training obstacles. Therefore, while cryogenic carbon capture techniques appear promising, operators often avoid the hassle of implementing such techniques in spite of the promising potential.
Embodiments of a cryogenic-based carbon dioxide capture system are detailed herein. For one embodiment an exhaust line for channeling a gas stream to a first cooling assembly is taught. The stream begins with an initial mean temperature and the stream includes carbon dioxide gas. The first cooling assembly is utilized to bring the stream temperature down to an initial cooling temperature below the mean temperature. A water extraction mechanism of the system is then utilized to remove condensed water from the stream. In one embodiment, a second cooling assembly is then utilized to bring a temperature of the stream further down to a temperature between the initial cooling temperature and closer to a de-sublimation temperature for carbon dioxide. A work extraction mechanism of the system may then be utilized to condense the carbon dioxide from the stream into a solid form by work extraction and in substantial absence of surface accretion within the system.
Implementations of various structure and techniques will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that these drawings are illustrative and not meant to limit the scope of claimed embodiments.
Embodiments are described with reference to a particular cryogenic-based carbon capture system. Specifically, the embodiments depict a system where work extraction is utilized to condense carbon dioxide from a gas stream. In this manner, obtaining carbon dioxide in solid form may be achieved in a manner that avoids surface accretion. However, other configurations of the system may be utilized. For example, there may be options in utilizing multiple compressors, the extracted carbon dioxide in solid form may be liquified and re-used through the system for continued operation and a host of other system layout possibilities. Regardless, so long as the system achieves carbon-capture with a work extraction mechanism, as opposed to being a surface temperature based reduction, at the time of condensation, appreciable benefit may be realized in the substantial absence of surface accretion.
Referring now to
Ultimately, it is the work extraction mechanism 185, such as a turbo-expander, that presents a volumetric effect on the received gas stream to cool and condense without reliance on a cooling surface to achieve the cooling and condensation. As a result, condensation or accretion of carbon dioxide is not promoted at system surfaces. Thus, once the stream begins to present as a partially solid carbon dioxide stream 197, clogging or blocking of the flow with buildup is not promoted. Indeed, as illustrated at 195, upon routing through a mechanical separator 190, solid carbon dioxide may be drawn from the system for practical management and removal from the system 100. This leaves a clean emission 180 available for venting or other uses as described further below (e.g. see the clean emission 180 venting illustrated at
Continuing with reference to
Once reaching this initial cooling temperature, the stream may be directed to a mechanical separator 145 where newly formed liquid water 150 may be removed. Additional water 150 may be removed by flowing the stream through a process dryer 155. With water 150 substantially removed, the stream may be directed to a second cooling assembly in the form of a recuperator 170. The recuperator 170 may be a heat exchanger where additional cooling may take place down to a working temperature that remains above a de-sublimation temperature for the carbon dioxide in the stream. The use of two-stage cooling allows for the removal of water at a practical temperature short of ice formation followed by additional cooling to facilitate later carbon dioxide solidification.
By this point, just prior to reaching the work extraction mechanism 185 and even with two stages of cooling, the stream remains at a temperature that is still above a condensation temperature for the carbon dioxide, generally between about −75° C. and −120° C., depending on the carbon dioxide concentration in the stream. The cold pressurized stream, still above this condensation temperature for carbon dioxide, may now be directed to the work extraction mechanism 185 described above. It is of note that when the stream reaches the work extraction mechanism 185, a substantial amount of cooling has already occurred and the stream is within about 10° C.-50° C. of the condensation temperature for the carbon dioxide, perhaps entering at about −85 C. This means that the degree to which the work extraction mechanism 185 is relied upon to achieve the solidification of the carbon dioxide is within a manageable range that does not rely on surface-based temperature reduction to achieve the solidification. As a result, the work extraction which occurs in the mechanism 185 may reasonably attain the necessary condensation temperature of less than about −120° C. without encouraging accretion of solid carbon dioxide at surfaces of the mechanism 185 or anywhere else within the system 100 for that matter.
As described above, the work extraction mechanism 185 may then be utilized to convert the stream to a partially solid carbon dioxide stream 197. At this point, the stream 197 may be directed to a mechanical separator 190 for separation of the solid carbon dioxide 195 from the stream to achieve the sought carbon capture. As noted above, the remainder of the stream may be considered a clean emission 180 that is vented or, as illustrated, re-utilized back to the recuperator 170 where the cooled gas may further facilitate the process. Of course, other types of routing for the clean emission 180 may also be incorporated into the layout.
For the embodiment shown, the work extraction mechanism 185 may constitute a dynamic working device such as a condensing turbine. However, a positive displacement device such as a piston or other volumetric affecting device may also be utilized to extract work through a moving boundary as opposed to inducing a dramatic temperature variation in order to achieve the sought degree of de-sublimation for solidifying the carbon dioxide. Indeed, the likelihood is that the boundary surfaces of the moving portions of the work extraction mechanism 185 will actually be warmer than the primary stream that is being cooled. Therefore, accretion of de-sublimating carbon dioxide may actually be discouraged thereby keeping the system 100 substantially free of clogging for sake of continued operation. As noted above, the power available from the work extraction mechanism 185 may also naturally be a candidate for supplementing power to the shaft 125 for further driving the initial compressor 120 or for other supplemental purposes.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the recuperators 170, 425 of
Referring now to
With the stream now cooled and potentially having undergone a degree of water extraction, it is now ready for solidification where the carbon removal is facilitated by formation of carbon dioxide into a solid form. More specifically, the carbon dioxide solid may be achieved by a work extraction mechanism as indicated at 565. This is beneficial due to the fact that work extraction may achieve the de-sublimation without requiring surface interaction with the stream where the surface is colder than the stream. As a result, carbon dioxide solidification may be achieved without a tendency to promote accumulation of carbon dioxide on the surfaces of the work extraction mechanism. Therefore, solidified carbon dioxide may be separated from the stream as indicated at 575 without any accretion-based clogging of the work extraction mechanism. This leaves a clean emission available for isolation and venting or other uses (see 585).
Embodiments described hereinabove include a system and techniques for achieving carbon extraction from an industrial gas through a cryogenic process that avoids accretion of carbon dioxide at system surfaces. Thus, dry ice accumulation at the inner walls of a flue or other channeling is avoided. Additionally, the equipment utilized may be readily available and scalable, industry standard components that do not require a complete re-configuration of system layouts that would be unfamiliar to those in the field. Use of a turbine as the work extraction mechanism option may even present a compact assembly that opens up additional space in the facility footprint. Once more, the addition of amines or other unique chemicals, consumables or process materials is not required as with other carbon extraction methods is not required. Ultimately, a system of familiar industry equipment that is uniquely arranged and includes a work extraction mechanism for the eventual carbon dioxide solidification allows for effective carbon removal from industrial gas without surface accretion and clogging that could lead to the expenses of considerable downtime and/or the need for regular equipment replacement.
The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.