The field of the embodiments disclosed herein relates to cryopreservation and more particularly to the freezing with minimal accompanying loss of viability or functionality of a living cell and cell derived or composed materials such as tissues and organs.
Cryopreservation of living systems has been actively pursued for over 100 years, from viruses and bacteria to plants and animal cells. Although human interest may extend back to the first observation of a thawing insect or plant in a subzero geography, experimental investigations into this process were actively pursued subsequent to the innovations in refrigeration of the mid-1800's. One of the first reports of specific cryoprotectants and their activity (Keith, 1913) identified glycerol as a cryoprotectant for E. coli. Almost as significantly, it may have been the first to reveal that inhibiting ice formation, or solidification, was a key in the protective effect through a freeze-thaw cycle. The latter remains true to the present, being the primary mechanistic effect through which cryoprotectant action is believed to act. Beyond the initial demonstration with E. coli, glycerol was the first true cryoprotectant for mammalian systems, including fowl spermatozoa (Parkes, 1945), red blood cells (Mollison et al, 1952) and both mouse L cells and human Hela cells (Scherer and Hoogasian, 1954). Soon after the demonstration of successful cryopreservation of mammalian cells using glycerol, it was found the ice inhibiting molecule Dimethylsulfoxide, DMSO, was a very effective cryoprotectant (Lovelock and Bishop, 1959). Its efficacy is borne out by over half a century of investigation, as it remains the dominant cryoprotectant across a wide range of biologyical applications, preferred in almost all applications despite its known toxicities.
So while DMSO mixed in a variety of formats, from simple phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffers to mixes of various growth medium containing both animal derived and recombinant proteins and serum as well as other types of ancillary molecules, is an effective cryoprotectant, toxicity can limit its application. Thus, a current need driven largely by cell therapy markets is to mitigate toxicities or adverse events related to DMSO. Moreover, there remains the desire to identify modalities that could effectively substitute for DMSO while minimizing the associated toxicities.
One of the underlying issues in replacing DMSO as a cryoprotectant may lie in an incomplete understanding of the details of how it is able to provide for cell recovery. A more compete mechanistic understanding might allow for designing rational approaches for alternate molecule(s).
An examination was made of the experimental similarities of the class of molecules identified as cryoprotectants, that they are utilized at supraphysiological concentrations sufficient to induce osmotic stress and cell dehydration, and that the compatibility of these particular solutes provides tolerance to high concentrations to permit inhibition of ice formation as the temperature approaches subzero targets. Further work leveraged the correlation between these features and their cryoprotective capacities to potentially identify and target molecules that were not known to have this high concentration induced cryoprotectant activity.
One class of molecules that has remained largely unstudied in this regard are amino acids. With the exception of proline and betaine, effects of amino acids in cryopreservation at these concentrations have largely been unstudied to this point. Proline and betaine have both been shown to effective for cryoprotection, but only when present intracellularly at supraphysiological levels, requiring specific cell loading through prolonged incubation or by electroporation (Gao, 2021), which itself can be damaging to cells. Amino acids have been studied in multiple polymeric forms including antifreeze peptide templated variants and homopolymeric peptides of charged residues. However, surveys of free amino acids in the context of driving osmotic shock and subsequent metabolic events that could provide both intra-and extracellular cryoprotection, have not been reported.
In some embodiments, compositions and methods have been discovered whereby a strong cryoprotectant activity across three different mammalian cell lines was achieved utilizing glutamate. As demonstrated herein, it is active as a sole agent in this regard, but can also act as a primary cryoprotectant in a number of buffers, including growth medium and physiological saline, demonstrating its versatility in a way that most primary cryoprotectants have been utilized. It requires hypertonic/supraphysiological concentration ranges to be effective for cryoprotection as a sole agent.
In further embodiments, and unlike other cryoprotectants, we also describe compositions and methods in which one or more additional amino acids can be substituted for glutamate to achieve hypertonic mixtures as long as there is a minimal level of glutamate present. Perhaps not surprisingly, some of the amino acid mixtures had cryoprotective activity in the absence of glutamate, though not as effective.
In still other embodiments, compositions and methods are disclosed in which glutamate can be used in the presence of other cryoprotectants such as DMSO, and glutamate was found to greatly increase the protection afforded by very low concentrations of DMSO, suggesting these molecules may be synergistic in their action
The idea of utilizing a chemistry based entirely on amino acids to create a cryoprotectant solution has many potential advantages. The most compelling being, perhaps, that any resulting composition would be made entirely of molecules in the natural milieu of cells. By virtue of the fact that my studies revealed inclusion of a wide variety of amino acids with glutamate, including those with polar and charged side chains, it is possible that acclimation of different cell lines or types could be done by biasing the amino acid composition to one that might be more compatible with that cells particular contextual biases based on its own biochemical makeup. Additionally, the identification of an amino acid chemistry able to confer cryoprotection that is compatible with growth media, physiological buffers and molecules, and other cryoprotectants also creates the opportunity to create compositions that also include molecules and other chemistries that can promote cell potency, growth, or stability.
Moreover, embodiment herein reveal single amino acids that act synergistically with low (e.g., 1%) DMSO concentrations to bring about effective cryoprotection. Furthermore, amino acid mixtures also have been found to exhibit enhanced synergy in the presence of low concentrations of DMSO.
Investigations of cold hardiness in plants and insects (Sakai, 1962, Salt, 1961) provided the basis for early discoveries in animal cells, with sugars and sugar alcohols, including glycerol, trehalose, and sorbitol supporting freeze-thaw survival, in some cases to temperature below liquid nitrogen. The range of investigation and the large number of approaches generated from these and other cold tolerant systems and the currently continued preference for DMSO highlight the efficacy of the latter. A curated compilation of molecules exhibiting cryoprotective activities was first published by Karow (Karow, 1969). This number was later reduced to 25, of which only 10 were identified as generally effective for cryoprotection (Ashwood-Smith, 1987). Although serum, dextran, polyethylene glycol (PEG), sucrose, among others were identified with some cryoprotective activity, only DMSO and glycerol were noted as very effective and commonly used, the others less so.
A more recent update (Elliot et al, 2017) provided curation including effectiveness for a slightly larger list of 28 compounds, separated into five classes based on molecule type: alcohols, sugars and sugar alcohols, polymers, sulfoxides & amides, and amines. Again, most notable are the two most effective categories in this work: i) highly effective across cell types and ii) very effective for defined cell types only. Both included just one molecule each: DMSO and glycerol, respectively, suggesting broad efficacy and utility across many cell models to have maintained class leading status for 60+ and 110+ years. More recently, a great deal of effort and progress has been made in the area of polymers, both synthetic and biological, in the form of oligomeric ampholytes such as amino acid derivatives and biologics based on antifreeze protein templates.
It is important to specify the context of the above discussion of cryoprotectants includes only those molecules that have been found to impart significant cryoprotectant activity without the aid of additional chemical species, i.e. cryoprotectants are capable of sustaining viability through a freeze-thaw cycle at subzero temperatures in the absence of other molecules. A number of additional molecules have been tested for their ability to influence overall viability or other desired character in the revived population. Typically these molecules are not obligatory and the extent to which many affect the cryopreservation process can be represented by fractional improvements in post-thaw viability. The most well studied example of such a molecules may be betaine and proline, which have been demonstrated to increase freeze-thaw viability in the case of a number of systems, including spermatozoa [Li 2003], red blood cells [RBCs, Dou 2019], and oocytes [Zhang, 2016].
Well studied across a variety of animal models, including goat, ram, and donkey, the work done with Cygnus monkey spermatozoa [Li, 2003] examined several amino acids, proline, glutamine, and glycine, demonstrating a modest increase with each, approximately 20% above that obtained with the control, at 5-10 mM, but interestingly revealed a decrease in post-thaw recovery beyond 10 mM, revealing a loss of improvement and further decline at 50 mM, the highest concentration tested. These studies largely mirror the studies of spermatozoa in other animals, where it is typically used at similar or even lower concentrations to effect similar increases in recovery. However, in no case was proline ever tested or found to be effective as a sole cryoprotectant at any concentration. A study of mouse oocytes (Zhang, 2016) demonstrated an increase in implantation rate of 6-10% by the addition of 2M proline. However, as above, these increases were measured in the presence of two additional established primary cryoprotectants: DMSO and ethylene glycol. There was no activity reported for the ancillary proline in the absence of the additional bona fide cryoprotectants. Finally, in the case of RBCs [Dou, 2019], 1.5M proline was able to reduce hemolysis of frozen cells, but only in the presence of trehalose. The improvement was unclear given the low glycerol concentration used in positive controls supported high levels of hemolysis.
A second class of ancillary molecules is exemplified by their ability to scavenge free oxygen radicals and protect from oxidative damage (Alvarez and Storey, 1992 and Limaye, 1997). Early studies following the identification of adverse effects of free radicals on recovery from freeze-thaw revealed a number of molecules able to mitigate this damage and offer improved yield including ascorbate, catalase, alpha-tocopherol, and glutathione (Limaye, 1997). A host of additional molecules have been examined since then in various cell models. Like other ancillary molecules, these antioxidants are without prima fasciae activity as cryoprotectants, but can facilitate or improve recovery and yield in a cell type specific manner. A last example of ancillary molecules might also include a number of polymers such as hydroxylethyl starch or polyethylene glycol that, while reported as having “cryoprotective” activity without direct evidence in the absence of another cryoprotective agent, facilitate the activity of one of the bona fide cryoprotectants listed above.
In fact, distinguishing the mechanisms of actions for all of the molecules listed above becomes challenging given the relative resolution at which today's theories account for cryopreservative activities. The consensus view, as mentioned above, retains the common understanding and basic feature identified in 1913 that ice crystallization and its impact on cell integrity is a primary component of cryoprotection through which all of the primary cryoprotectants listed above bring about their protection against a freeze-thaw cycle. The proposed mechanism of action for all of these molecules typically resides in an ability to inhibit ice formation, through either nucleation, recrystallization, or both, at high sub-zero temperatures where much of the damage of ice formation is believed to take place.
Thus one manner to refer to compositions conferring cryoprotection on mammalian cells is the utilization of (a) one or molecules, that will typically act in a colligative manner at high concentration to induce osmotic stress and dehydration, to inhibit ice formation and other necessary activities, and (b) optionally one or more ancillary molecules that acts to improve one or more aspects of yield as measured by one or more assays that describe viability or a functional aspect of the cell. This definition represents much of the consensus understanding of cryopreservation, and likely the vast majority of cryopreservation buffers in use, in this context. To meet the requirement of (a), a primary cryoprotectant requires tolerance to high concentration, at least in the workflow timeline, it does not require a complete absence of toxicity as exemplified by DMSO.
However, as outlined above, despite a significant number of studies and resulting strategies for preserving cells undergoing a freeze-thaw cycle, none have provided the overall efficiency and broad applicability of DMSO.
For the studies detailed below, the following procedures were used for preparation of cell cultures prior to cryopreservation: Both HEK-293 and HCT-115 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% calf serum or 10% fetal calf serum. Two or three days prior to initiating a cryopreservation study, cells were seeded onto 100 mm tissue culture treated dishes in the above described culture medium and placed into a humidified, 5% CO2 incubator and allowed to propagate for 2 or 3 days. Preparation of growing cultures for cryostorage was performed as follows: Medium from 100 mm dishes containing growing cultures prepared as described above was aspirated and replaced with saline containing 0.5 mM EDTA and allowed to incubate for 2-3 minutes. This material was also aspirated and replaced with saline containing 0.25% trypsin and 0.25 mM EDTA. After incubating this second mixture for an additional 3-5 minutes and observing partial detachment of cells from dishes, cells were removed by using inertial force against the dish or by using a stream of saline or base culture medium to dislodge and collect cells from the dish. Cells harvested in this manner were separated by centrifugation (100 g×3 min), resuspended in the desired cryostorage solution, dispensed into polypropylene vials, positioned in microtube racks that were placed into a −80° C. freezer. Cells were kept frozen for 24-168 hours, at which time cryovials were removed to wet ice and cells thawed and plated into appropriate tissue culture vessels, typically 6 or 12 well plates. Cells were visualized with the aid of a Nikon TE300 microscope with an attached camera to allow documentation.
As described above, we wished to test the ability of amino acid species to serve as primary cryoprotectants per the definition provided, i.e. at concentrations at which they provided osmotic pressure sufficient to induce cell dehydration. For this purpose we prepared solutions of several amino acids, including alanine, glycine, proline, glutamate, histidine, aspartate, leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, threonine, arginine, and serine. These were standardized to 1M and adjusted to pH 7.1-pH 7.3, where possible or to maximal concentrations when 1M was above the solubility such as histidine and leucine. These solutions were used by dilution in water to test for their ability to serve as a cryoprotectant or diluted to the desired target concentration in a variety of base media including saline, and the two growth mediums described above (DMEM and OptiMeM) in the studies with three different mammalian cell lines described below described below.
The studies shown in the data from
Various changes and modifications to the embodiments herein chosen for purposes of illustration will readily occur to those skilled in the art. To the extent that such modifications and variations do not depart from the spirit of the embodiments, they are intended to be included within the scope thereof.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63515187 | Jul 2023 | US |