The present technology relates generally to cryotherapeutic systems. In particular, several embodiments are directed to cryotherapeutic devices having integral multi-helical balloons and associated systems and methods.
The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is a primarily involuntary bodily control system typically associated with stress responses. Fibers of the SNS innervate tissue in almost every organ system of the human body and can affect characteristics such as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. Such regulation can have adaptive utility in maintaining homeostasis or in preparing the body for rapid response to environmental factors. Chronic activation of the SNS, however, is a common maladaptive response that can drive the progression of many disease states. Excessive activation of the renal SNS in particular has been identified experimentally and in humans as a likely contributor to the complex pathophysiology of hypertension, states of volume overload (such as heart failure), and progressive renal disease. For example, radiotracer dilution has demonstrated increased renal norepinephrine (NE) spillover rates in patients with essential hypertension.
Cardio-renal sympathetic nerve hyperactivity can be particularly pronounced in patients with heart failure. For example, an exaggerated NE overflow from the heart and kidneys to plasma is often found in these patients. Heightened SNS activation commonly characterizes both chronic and end-stage renal disease. In patients with end-stage renal disease, NE plasma levels above the median have been demonstrated to be predictive for cardiovascular diseases and several causes of death. This is also true for patients suffering from diabetic or contrast nephropathy. Evidence suggests that afferent signals originating from diseased kidneys are major contributors to initiating and sustaining elevated central sympathetic outflow.
Sympathetic nerves to the kidneys terminate in the blood vessels, the juxtaglomerular apparatus, and the renal tubules. Stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves can cause increased renin release, increased sodium (Na+) reabsorption, and a reduction of renal blood flow. These neural regulation components of renal function are considerably stimulated in disease states characterized by heightened sympathetic tone and likely contribute to increased blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The reduction of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate as a result of renal sympathetic efferent stimulation is likely a cornerstone of the loss of renal function in cardio-renal syndrome (i.e., renal dysfunction as a progressive complication of chronic heart failure). Pharmacologic strategies to thwart the consequences of renal efferent sympathetic stimulation include centrally acting sympatholytic drugs, beta blockers (intended to reduce renin release), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers (intended to block the action of angiotensin II and aldosterone activation consequent to renin release), and diuretics (intended to counter the renal sympathetic mediated sodium and water retention). These pharmacologic strategies, however, have significant limitations including limited efficacy, compliance issues, side effects, and others. Accordingly, there is a strong public-health need for alternative treatment strategies.
Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale. Instead, emphasis is placed on illustrating clearly the principles of the present technology. Furthermore, components can be shown as transparent in certain views for clarity of illustration only and not to indicate that the illustrated component is necessarily transparent.
The present technology is directed to cryotherapeutic devices having integral multi-lumen shafts with multi-helical balloon sections and methods of making the devices. Specific details of several embodiments of the present technology are described herein with reference to
The terms “distal” and “proximal” are used in the following description with respect to a position or direction relative to the operator or the operator's control device (e.g., a handle assembly). “Distal” or “distally” are a position distant from or in a direction away from the operator or the operator's control device. “Proximal” and “proximally” are a position near or in a direction toward the operator or the operator's control device.
I. Cryotherapy and Renal Neuromodulation
Cryotherapeutic systems and components of cryotherapeutic systems configured in accordance with embodiments of the present technology can be configured for renal neuromodulation, i.e., the partial or complete incapacitation or other effective disruption of nerves innervating the kidneys. In particular, renal neuromodulation can include inhibiting, reducing, and/or blocking neural communication along neural fibers (i.e., efferent and/or afferent nerve fibers) innervating the kidneys. Such incapacitation can be long-term (e.g., permanent or for periods of months, years, or decades) or short-term (e.g., for periods of minutes, hours, days, or weeks). Renal neuromodulation can contribute to the systemic reduction of sympathetic tone or drive. Accordingly, renal neuromodulation is expected to be useful in treating clinical conditions associated with systemic sympathetic overactivity or hyperactivity, particularly conditions associated with central sympathetic overstimulation. Renal neuromodulation is expected to efficaciously treat hypertension, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic and end-stage renal disease, inappropriate fluid retention in heart failure, cardio-renal syndrome, polycystic kidney disease, polycystic ovary syndrome, osteoporosis, and sudden death, among others. Furthermore, renal neuromodulation can potentially benefit a variety of organs and bodily structures innervated by sympathetic nerves. A more detailed description of pertinent patient anatomy and physiology is provided below.
Various techniques can be used to partially or completely incapacitate neural pathways, such as those innervating the kidneys. Cryotherapy, for example, includes cooling tissue at a target site in a manner that modulates neural function. The mechanisms of cryotherapeutic tissue damage include, for example, direct cell injury (e.g., necrosis), vascular injury (e.g., starving the cell from nutrients by damaging supplying blood vessels), and sublethal hypothermia with subsequent apoptosis. Exposure to cryotherapeutic cooling can cause acute cell death (e.g., immediately after exposure) and/or delayed cell death (e.g., during tissue thawing and subsequent hyperperfusion). Several embodiments of the present technology include cooling a structure at or near an inner surface of a renal artery wall such that proximate (e.g., adjacent) tissue is effectively cooled to a depth where sympathetic renal nerves reside. For example, the cooling structure can be cooled to the extent that it causes therapeutically effective cryogenic renal neuromodulation. Sufficiently cooling at least a portion of a sympathetic renal nerve is expected to slow or potentially block conduction of neural signals to produce a prolonged or permanent reduction in renal sympathetic activity.
Cryotherapy has certain characteristics that can be beneficial for renal neuromodulation. For example, rapidly cooling tissue can provide an analgesic effect such that cryotherapies may be less painful than ablating tissue at high temperatures. Cryotherapies may thus require less analgesic medication to maintain patient comfort during a procedure compared to heat-ablation procedures. Additionally, reducing pain can reduce patient movement and thereby increase operator success or reduce procedural complications. Cryotherapy also typically does not cause significant collagen tightening, and therefore is not typically associated with vessel stenosis. Cryotherapies generally include cooling at temperatures that cause cryotherapeutic applicators to adhere to moist tissue. This can be beneficial because it can promote stable, consistent, and continued contact during treatment. The typical conditions of treatment can make this an attractive feature because, for example, a patient can move during treatment, a catheter associated with an applicator can move, and/or respiration can cause the kidneys to rise and fall and thereby move the renal arteries. In addition, blood flow is pulsatile and causes the renal arteries to pulse. Adhesion associated with cryotherapeutic cooling also can be advantageous when treating short renal arteries in which stable intravascular positioning can be more difficult to achieve.
II. Selected Embodiments of Cryotherapeutic Systems
The console 102 can include or be fluidly coupled to a supply line 110 configured to transport the refrigerant 106 to the cryotherapeutic device 103. The supply control valve 108 can be operably coupled to the supply line 110, and can be configured to manually or automatically control the flow of refrigerant 106 along the supply line 110. The console 102 can further include a pump 111 (e.g., a vacuum pump, a DC-powered pump, etc.), a back-pressure control valve 113, and an exhaust line 115. The exhaust line 115 can be configured to receive exhausted refrigerant 117 from the cryotherapeutic device 103, and the back-pressure control valve 113 can be operably coupled to the exhaust line 115. The pump 111 can be configured to reduce the back pressure of exhausted refrigerant 117 to below ambient pressure. Reducing the back pressure of exhausted refrigerant 117 to below ambient pressure using the pump 111 (e.g., in conjunction with increasing the flow rate of refrigerant 106 using the supply control valve 108) can increase the refrigeration potential of the refrigerant 106. In other embodiments, the exhausted refrigerant 117 can exhaust to about ambient pressure. In various embodiments, the console 102 can further include a controller 118 configured to operate the supply control valve 108 and/or the back-pressure control valve 113. The controller 118, for example, can include a processor (not shown) or dedicated circuitry (not shown) configured to implement a computerized algorithm for executing a treatment procedure or a portion of a treatment procedure automatically.
As shown in
In various embodiments, the system 100 can be configured to monitor the pressure within a portion of the cryotherapeutic device 103 during a treatment procedure. As shown in
The system 100 may be used for neuromodulation at various target sites throughout the body. For example,
After the cooling assembly 128 is adequately positioned in the renal artery or at the renal ostium, it can be inflated or otherwise radially expanded at the target site until the cooling assembly 128 is positioned in stable contact with the inner wall of the renal artery. For example, the cooling assembly 128 can be inflated by delivering the refrigerant 106 (
The neuromodulating effects are generally a function of, at least in part, the temperature of the cooling assembly 128, contact between the cooling assembly 128 and vessel wall, dwell time of the cooling assembly 128, number of cooling cycles (e.g., one or more cooling cycles separated by a warming period), and blood flow through the vessel. Desired cooling effects may include cooling the cooling assembly 128 such that the temperatures of target neural fibers are below a desired threshold to achieve cryo alteration or ablation. For example, the refrigerant gas in the cooling assembly 128 can be cooled to a temperature of about −88° C. to about −60° C., or in other embodiments the gas in the cooling assembly 128 can have a temperature of about −80° C. to about −40° C.
Therapeutically effective cryogenic renal neuromodulation can occur within about 100 seconds (e.g., within about 90 seconds, 75 seconds, 60 seconds, or 30 seconds) of the cooling assembly 128 reaching a cryogenic temperature when adjacent to the renal artery or renal ostium or of the cooling assembly 128 being applied to the renal artery or renal ostium when the cooling assembly 128 is already cryogenically cooled. In some embodiments, a treatment procedure can include two cooling cycles separated by a warming period. In other embodiments, a treatment procedure can include more than two cooling cycles separated by warming periods. The cooling cycles can have the same duration or different durations, such as between about 10 seconds and about 90 seconds each. The duration(s) of the warming periods can be sufficient to partially or completely thaw frozen matter at an interface between the cooling assembly 128 and the inner wall of the renal artery or renal ostium. In some embodiments, the duration(s) of the warming periods can be between about 5 seconds and about 90 seconds. Individual warming periods between cooling cycles can last for the same amount of time or for different amounts of time. In various embodiments, warming cycles may include deflating the cooling assembly 128 (e.g., by terminating the flow of refrigerant to the cooling assembly 128) to allow blood to flow around and warm the cooling assembly 128. The blood flow can partially or fully thaw frozen matter at the interface between the cooling assembly 128 and the arterial wall, and thereby detach the cooling assembly 128 from the tissue. Warming cycles may also include filling at least some of the lumens of the cooling assembly 128 with a warm fluid after a cooling cycle.
At least a portion of the cooling assembly 128 can be placed in a guide catheter or sheath 140 that flexes and/or otherwise facilitates navigation through the vasculature to locate the distal portion 126 of the shaft 120 proximate a treatment site, e.g., within the renal artery RA. For example, the guide catheter 140 may have a 6 Fr outer diameter with a lumen diameter of approximately 1.80 mm (0.071 inch). A guide wire GW can be used in addition to or in lieu of the guide catheter 140 to facilitate delivery of the cooling assembly 128 to the treatment site. The guide wire GW can be inserted through the vasculature to the treatment site, and the shaft 120 and/or the guide catheter 140 can be passed over the guide wire GW to the treatment site. At the treatment site, the guide catheter 140 and the shaft 120 can be moved relative to one another to expose the cooling assembly 128. For example, the guide catheter 140 can be pulled proximally or otherwise retracted from the distal end of the shaft 120, and/or the shaft 120 can be pushed distally from the opening of the guide catheter 140. In various embodiments, the cooling assembly 128 may deploy automatically (e.g., using a shape memory material) as it is exposed from the guide catheter 140. In other embodiments, the cooling assembly 128 can remain in a substantially low-profile configuration until the operator initiates deployment (e.g., via the handle 124 shown in
As shown in
The inflatable body 142 can include a plurality of inner walls 146 that extend from the outer wall 144 into the inflatable body 142 and divide the inflatable body 142 into a plurality of lumens. The inflatable body 142 may include, for example, two or more lumens (e.g., three, four, or five lumens) extending through the inflatable body 142. As shown in
In various embodiments, the lumens can be pressurized and/or inflated with fluids having different temperatures to provide selective cryotherapeutic treatment to arterial or venous walls. For example, a first lumen extending through the inflatable body 142 may define an expansion chamber and be configured to receive a cryogenically cooled fluid that provides therapeutically effective neuromodulation. A second lumen may be configured to receive a higher-temperature fluid that does not provide therapeutic neuromodulating effects. The second lumen may be configured to receive, for example, a heated fluid, a cooled fluid (e.g., a refrigerant) that is not at a therapeutically effective temperature, a gas at ambient temperature, a fluid at body temperature (e.g., blood), and/or other fluids at non-therapeutically effective temperatures. The differences in the fluid temperatures in the first and second lumens causes the inflatable body 142 to transfer heat to different areas of the inner wall of the renal artery RA at different rates, and the helical arrangement of the lumens results in different rates of heat transfer at longitudinal segments of the renal artery RA. The inflatable body 142 can therefore provide therapeutically effective cooling to non-circumferential longitudinal segments of the renal artery RA. In other embodiments, all of the lumens may be configured to receive cryogenically cooled fluids to provide fully circumferential neuromodulation at longitudinal segments of a vessel.
In various embodiments, the lumens of the inflatable body 142 can be fluidly isolated from one another. For example, the inflatable body 142 can include at least one cooling lumen fluidly coupled to a supply tube and an exhaust passageway. The supply tube can deliver a refrigerant (e.g., nitrous oxide) in a liquid or substantially liquid state to the cooling lumen, and the refrigerant can expand to a gas state and therapeutically cool surrounding tissue. The exhaust passageway can be open to the cooling lumen and receive the refrigerant after expansion to remove the expanded refrigerant from the inflatable body 142. Other lumens of the inflatable body 142 can be fluidly coupled to separate supply and/or exhaust lumens and inflated with non-cryogenically cooled fluids. In other embodiments, the lumens of the inflatable body 142 can serve as the supply lumens for therapeutically cooled or non-therapeutically cooled fluids. As described in greater detail below, in other embodiments two or more of the lumens of the inflatable body 142 can be fluidly connected such that a refrigerant can be delivered to one lumen of the inflatable body 142 via a supply lumen and the expanded refrigerant can be exhausted proximally from the inflatable body 142 via a second lumen of the inflatable body 142.
In still further embodiments, different fluids and/or fluids having different temperatures can be supplied to the lumens of the inflatable body 142 during different time periods. For example, a refrigerant can be supplied to one or more lumens during a cooling cycle for partial or full-circumferential neuromodulation. The refrigerant supply can be slowed or terminated to begin a warming cycle, and a higher temperature fluid (e.g., warm saline) can be supplied in the same lumens and/or other lumens of the inflatable body 142 to warm the inflatable body 14 and transfer heat to the adjacent vessel wall. This can thaw frozen matter at the interface between the inflatable body 142 and the vessel wall, and thereby detach the inflatable body 142 from the vessel wall.
III. Methods of Forming Integral Multi-Helical Balloons
As shown in
The shaft 402 can be extruded such that the outer and inner walls 404 and 406 of the shaft 402 can be part of a single integrated component. For example, the shaft 402 can be formed from a thermoplastic resin using hot melt extrusion. In other embodiments, the shaft 402 can be formed by pushing or drawing a material (e.g., a polymeric material) through a die having a desired cross-sectional shape (e.g., the five-lumen shaft 402 illustrated in
As further shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As further shown in
The inflatable body 418 can be configured to move between a delivery state (e.g., a collapsed, deflated, or low-profile configuration) and an inflated or deployed state (
In various embodiments, the lumens 408 can be fluidly independent of one another and configured to receive different types of fluids and/or fluids having different temperatures.
In other embodiments, two or more of the lumens 408 can be fluidly coupled to one another.
Referring back to
As further shown in
As shown in
As shown in
A method of forming a distal portion of a cryotherapeutic device (e.g., the cooling assembly 128 of the cryotherapeutic device 103 described above with reference to
After the shaft has been formed, the method can continue by clamping opposite end regions of a portion of the shaft, and twisting at least one of the clamped end regions to form intertwined helical lumens along the portion. The shaft can be clamped using O-rings and/or other suitable clamping mechanisms, and the clamping force applied to the shaft can be sufficient to grasp the shaft while maintaining the integrity of the lumens. In various embodiments, mandrels can be extended through at least a portion of the lumens to keep the lumens open during the twisting step. For example, mandrels can be extended into the individual lumens at the end regions (e.g., at the clamp) to support the lumens as the clamping force is applied. In other embodiments, the lumens can be pressurized to support the lumens during the twisting step. In certain embodiments, the method can also include applying heat to the shaft during twisting. The heated shaft material can be more malleable, and therefore easier to shape into the intertwined helical lumens. The resultant shaft includes a twisted portion in which the lumens are intertwined. The lumens can extend substantially straight along the shaft proximal and/or distal to the twisted portion (e.g., outside of the clamped portion).
The method can further include plastically enlarging the twisted portion of the shaft to form an inflatable body. The shaft can be plastically enlarged using stretch blow molding techniques. For example, the twisted portion of the shaft can define a preform or parison that is placed into a cavity of a mold, pressurized, and stretched to enlarge or expand the shaft to form the inflatable body (e.g., a balloon). The mold cavity can have a shape corresponding to that of the desired inflatable body in an expanded or inflated state. In various embodiments, the shaft can be pressurized by delivering a fluid into the outer lumens through an end of the shaft (e.g., the distal end), and the resultant pressure increase within the lumens can expand or enlarge the portion of the shaft within the mold cavity. The fluid can be delivered into the lumens at least substantially equally across the cross-sectional area of the shaft to provide substantially uniform radial expansion of the outer lumens. The shaft can be stretched during the blow molding step to elongate the preform (e.g., the twisted portion of the shaft), and heat can be applied to facilitate stretching and/or blow molding. The enlarged portion of the shaft can define a balloon that can be configured to deliver cryotherapeutic cooling at a treatment site. The balloon can be attached to a distal end of a catheter shaft (e.g., the shaft 120 of
IV. Related Anatomy and Physiology
The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is a branch of the autonomic nervous system along with the enteric nervous system and parasympathetic nervous system. It is always active at a basal level (called sympathetic tone) and becomes more active during times of stress. Like other parts of the nervous system, the SNS operates through a series of interconnected neurons. Sympathetic neurons are frequently considered part of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), although many lie within the central nervous system (CNS). Sympathetic neurons of the spinal cord (which is part of the CNS) communicate with peripheral sympathetic neurons via a series of sympathetic ganglia. Within the ganglia, spinal cord sympathetic neurons join peripheral sympathetic neurons through synapses. Spinal cord sympathetic neurons are therefore called presynaptic (or preganglionic) neurons, while peripheral sympathetic neurons are called postsynaptic (or postganglionic) neurons.
At synapses within the sympathetic ganglia, preganglionic sympathetic neurons release acetylcholine, a chemical messenger that binds and activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on postganglionic neurons. In response to this stimulus, postganglionic neurons principally release norepinephrine. Prolonged activation may elicit the release of adrenaline from the adrenal medulla. Once released, norepinephrine binds adrenergic receptors on peripheral tissues. Binding to adrenergic receptors causes a neuronal and hormonal response. The physiologic manifestations include pupil dilation, increased heart rate, occasional vomiting, and increased blood pressure. Increased sweating is also seen due to binding of cholinergic receptors of the sweat glands.
The SNS is responsible for up and down regulation of many homeostatic mechanisms in living organisms. Fibers from the SNS innervate tissues in almost every organ system, providing at least some regulatory function to physiological features as diverse as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. This response is also known as the sympatho-adrenal response of the body, as the preganglionic sympathetic fibers that end in the adrenal medulla (but also all other sympathetic fibers) secrete acetylcholine, which activates the secretion of adrenaline (epinephrine) and to a lesser extent noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Therefore, this response that acts primarily on the cardiovascular system is mediated directly via impulses transmitted through the SNS and indirectly via catecholamines secreted from the adrenal medulla.
Science typically looks at the SNS as an automatic regulation system, that is, one that operates without the intervention of conscious thought. Some evolutionary theorists suggest that the SNS operated in early organisms to maintain survival as the SNS is responsible for priming the body for action. One example of this priming is in the moments before waking, in which sympathetic outflow spontaneously increases in preparation for action.
A. The Sympathetic Chain
As shown in
In order to reach the target organs and glands, the axons travel long distances in the body. Many axon cells relay their messages to second cells through synaptic transmission. For example, the ends of axon cells can link across a space (i.e., a synapse) to dendrites of the second cell. The first cell (the presynaptic cell) can send a neurotransmitter across the synaptic cleft where it activates the second cell (the postsynaptic cell). The message is then carried to the final destination. In the SNS and other components of the PNS, these synapses are made at sites called ganglia, discussed above. The cell that sends its fiber is called a preganglionic cell, while the cell whose fiber leaves the ganglion is called a postganglionic cell. As mentioned previously, the preganglionic cells of the SNS are located between the first thoracic (T1) segment and third lumbar (L3) segments of the spinal cord. Postganglionic cells have their cell bodies in the ganglia and send their axons to target organs or glands. The ganglia include not just the sympathetic trunks but also the cervical ganglia (superior, middle, and inferior), which send sympathetic nerve fibers to the head and thorax organs, and the celiac and mesenteric ganglia, which send sympathetic fibers to the gut.
B. Innervation of the Kidneys
As
Preganglionic neuronal cell bodies are located in the intermediolateral cell column of the spinal cord. Preganglionic axons pass through the paravertebral ganglia (they do not synapse) to become the lesser splanchnic nerve, the least splanchnic nerve, the first lumbar splanchnic nerve, and the second lumbar splanchnic nerve, and they travel to the celiac ganglion, the superior mesenteric ganglion, and the aorticorenal ganglion. Postganglionic neuronal cell bodies exit the celiac ganglion, the superior mesenteric ganglion, and the aorticorenal ganglion to the renal plexus and are distributed to the renal vasculature.
C. Renal Sympathetic Neural Activity
Messages travel through the SNS in a bidirectional flow. Efferent messages may trigger changes in different parts of the body simultaneously. For example, the SNS may accelerate heart rate, widen bronchial passages, decrease motility (movement) of the large intestine, constrict blood vessels, increase peristalsis in the esophagus, cause pupil dilation, cause piloerection (i.e., goose bumps), cause perspiration (i.e., sweating), and raise blood pressure. Afferent messages carry signals from various organs and sensory receptors in the body to other organs and, particularly, the brain.
Hypertension, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease are a few of many disease states that result from chronic activation of the SNS, especially the renal sympathetic nervous system. Chronic activation of the SNS is a maladaptive response that drives the progression of these disease states. Pharmaceutical management of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has been a longstanding, but somewhat ineffective, approach for reducing overactivity of the SNS.
As mentioned above, the renal sympathetic nervous system has been identified as a major contributor to the complex pathophysiology of hypertension, states of volume overload (such as heart failure), and progressive renal disease, both experimentally and in humans. Studies employing radiotracer dilution methodology to measure overflow of norepinephrine from the kidneys to plasma revealed increased renal norepinephrine spillover rates in patients with essential hypertension, particularly so in young hypertensive subjects, which in concert with increased norepinephrine spillover from the heart, is consistent with the hemodynamic profile typically seen in early hypertension and characterized by an increased heart rate, cardiac output, and renovascular resistance. It is now known that essential hypertension is commonly neurogenic, often accompanied by pronounced SNS overactivity.
Activation of cardiorenal sympathetic nerve activity is even more pronounced in heart failure, as demonstrated by an exaggerated increase of norepinephrine overflow from the heart and the kidneys to plasma in this patient group. In line with this notion is the recent demonstration of a strong negative predictive value of renal sympathetic activation on all-cause mortality and heart transplantation in patients with congestive heart failure, which is independent of overall sympathetic activity, glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction. These findings support the notion that treatment regimens that are designed to reduce renal sympathetic stimulation have the potential to improve survival in patients with heart failure.
Both chronic and end-stage renal disease are characterized by heightened sympathetic nervous activation. In patients with end-stage renal disease, plasma levels of norepinephrine above the median have been demonstrated to be predictive for both all-cause death and death from cardiovascular disease. This is also true for patients suffering from diabetic or contrast nephropathy. There is compelling evidence suggesting that afferent signals originating from the diseased kidneys are major contributors to initiating and sustaining elevated central sympathetic outflow in this patient group. This facilitates the occurrence of the well-known adverse consequences of chronic sympathetic overactivity, such as hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, insulin resistance, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.
(i) Renal Sympathetic Efferent Nerve Activity
Sympathetic nerves to the kidneys terminate in the blood vessels, the juxtaglomerular apparatus and the renal tubules. Stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves causes increased renin release, increased sodium (Na+) reabsorption, and a reduction of renal blood flow. These components of the neural regulation of renal function are considerably stimulated in disease states characterized by heightened sympathetic tone and clearly contribute to the rise in blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The reduction of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate as a result of renal sympathetic efferent stimulation is likely a cornerstone of the loss of renal function in cardio-renal syndrome, which is renal dysfunction as a progressive complication of chronic heart failure, with a clinical course that typically fluctuates with the patient's clinical status and treatment. Pharmacologic strategies to thwart the consequences of renal efferent sympathetic stimulation include centrally acting sympatholytic drugs, beta blockers (intended to reduce renin release), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers (intended to block the action of angiotensin II and aldosterone activation consequent to renin release), and diuretics (intended to counter the renal sympathetic mediated sodium and water retention). However, the current pharmacologic strategies have significant limitations including limited efficacy, compliance issues, side effects, and others.
(ii) Renal Afferent Nerve Activity
The kidneys communicate with integral structures in the CNS via renal afferent nerves. Several forms of “renal injury” may induce activation of afferent signals. For example, renal ischemia, reduction in stroke volume or renal blood flow, or an abundance of adenosine enzyme may trigger activation of afferent neural communication. As shown in
The physiology therefore suggests that (a) modulation of tissue with efferent sympathetic nerves will reduce inappropriate renin release, salt retention, and reduction of renal blood flow, and (b) modulation of tissue with afferent nerves will reduce the systemic contribution to hypertension and other disease states associated with increased central sympathetic tone through its direct effect on the posterior hypothalamus as well as the contralateral kidney. In addition to the central hypotensive effects of afferent renal denervation, a desirable reduction of central sympathetic outflow to various other sympathetically innervated organs such as the heart and the vasculature is anticipated.
D. Additional Clinical Benefits of Renal Denervation
As provided above, renal denervation is likely to be valuable in the treatment of several clinical conditions characterized by increased overall and particularly renal sympathetic activity such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic end-stage renal disease, inappropriate fluid retention in heart failure, cardio-renal syndrome, and sudden death. Since the reduction of afferent neural signals contributes to the systemic reduction of sympathetic tone/drive, renal denervation might also be useful in treating other conditions associated with systemic sympathetic hyperactivity. Accordingly, renal denervation may also benefit other organs and bodily structures innervated by sympathetic nerves, including those identified in
E. Achieving Intravascular Access to the Renal Artery
In accordance with the present technology, neuromodulation of a left and/or right renal plexus, which is intimately associated with a left and/or right renal artery, may be achieved through intravascular access. As
As
As will be described in greater detail later, the femoral artery may be accessed and cannulated at the base of the femoral triangle just inferior to the midpoint of the inguinal ligament. A catheter may be inserted percutaneously into the femoral artery through this access site, passed through the iliac artery and aorta, and placed into either the left or right renal artery. This comprises an intravascular path that offers minimally invasive access to a respective renal artery and/or other renal blood vessels.
The wrist, upper arm, and shoulder region provide other locations for introduction of catheters into the arterial system. For example, catheterization of either the radial, brachial, or axillary artery may be utilized in select cases. Catheters introduced via these access points may be passed through the subclavian artery on the left side (or via the subclavian and brachiocephalic arteries on the right side), through the aortic arch, down the descending aorta and into the renal arteries using standard angiographic technique.
F. Properties and Characteristics of the Renal Vasculature
Since neuromodulation of a left and/or right renal plexus may be achieved in accordance with embodiments of the present technology through intravascular access, properties and characteristics of the renal vasculature may impose constraints upon and/or inform the design of apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving such renal neuromodulation. Some of these properties and characteristics may vary across the patient population and/or within a specific patient across time, as well as in response to disease states, such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, insulin resistance, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, etc. These properties and characteristics, as explained herein, may have bearing on the efficacy of the procedure and the specific design of the intravascular device. Properties of interest may include, for example, material/mechanical, spatial, fluid dynamic/hemodynamic, and/or thermodynamic properties.
As discussed previously, a catheter may be advanced percutaneously into either the left or right renal artery via a minimally invasive intravascular path. However, minimally invasive renal arterial access may be challenging, for example, because as compared to some other arteries that are routinely accessed using catheters, the renal arteries are often extremely tortuous, may be of relatively small diameter, and/or may be of relatively short length. Furthermore, renal arterial atherosclerosis is common in many patients, particularly those with cardiovascular disease. Renal arterial anatomy also may vary significantly from patient to patient, which further complicates minimally invasive access. Significant inter-patient variation may be seen, for example, in relative tortuosity, diameter, length, and/or atherosclerotic plaque burden, as well as in the take-off angle at which a renal artery branches from the aorta. Apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving renal neuromodulation via intravascular access can account for these and other aspects of renal arterial anatomy and its variations across the patient population when minimally invasively accessing a renal artery.
In addition to complicating renal arterial access, specifics of the renal anatomy also complicate establishment of stable contact between neuromodulatory apparatus and a luminal surface or wall of a renal artery. When the neuromodulatory apparatus includes a cryotherapeutic device, consistent positioning, appropriate contact force applied by the cryotherapeutic device to the vessel wall, and adhesion between the cryo-applicator and the vessel wall can be important for predictability. However, navigation can be impeded by the tight space within a renal artery, as well as tortuosity of the artery. Furthermore, establishing consistent contact can be complicated by patient movement, respiration, and/or the cardiac cycle because these factors may cause significant movement of the renal artery relative to the aorta, and the cardiac cycle may transiently distend the renal artery (i.e., cause the wall of the artery to pulse).
After accessing a renal artery and facilitating stable contact between a neuromodulatory apparatus and a luminal surface of the artery, nerves in and around the adventitia of the artery can be modulated via the neuromodulatory apparatus. Effectively applying thermal treatment from within a renal artery is non-trivial given the potential clinical complications associated with such treatment. For example, the intima and media of the renal artery are highly vulnerable to thermal injury. As discussed in greater detail below, the intima-media thickness separating the vessel lumen from its adventitia means that target renal nerves may be multiple millimeters distant from the luminal surface of the artery. Sufficient energy can be delivered to or heat removed from the target renal nerves to modulate the target renal nerves without excessively cooling or heating the vessel wall to the extent that the wall is frozen, desiccated, or otherwise potentially affected to an undesirable extent. A potential clinical complication associated with excessive heating is thrombus formation from coagulating blood flowing through the artery. Given that this thrombus may cause a kidney infarct, thereby causing irreversible damage to the kidney, thermal treatment from within the renal artery can be applied carefully. Accordingly, the complex fluid mechanics and thermodynamic conditions present in the renal artery during treatment, particularly those that may impact heat transfer dynamics at the treatment site, may be important in applying energy (e.g., heating thermal energy) and/or removing heat from the tissue (e.g., cooling thermal conditions) from within the renal artery.
The neuromodulatory apparatus can be configured to allow for adjustable positioning and repositioning of an energy delivery element within the renal artery since location of treatment may also impact clinical efficacy. For example, it may be tempting to apply a full circumferential treatment from within the renal artery given that the renal nerves may be spaced circumferentially around a renal artery. In some situations, full-circle lesions likely resulting from a continuous circumferential treatment may be potentially related to renal artery stenosis. Therefore, the formation of more complex lesions along a longitudinal dimension of the renal artery via the cryotherapeutic devices and/or repositioning of the neuromodulatory apparatus to multiple treatment locations may be desirable. It should be noted, however, that a benefit of creating a circumferential ablation may outweigh the potential of renal artery stenosis, or the risk may be mitigated with certain embodiments or in certain patients, and creating a circumferential ablation could be a goal. Additionally, variable positioning and repositioning of the neuromodulatory apparatus may prove to be useful in circumstances where the renal artery is particularly tortuous or where there are proximal branch vessels off the renal artery main vessel, making treatment in certain locations challenging. Manipulation of a device in a renal artery can also consider mechanical injury imposed by the device on the renal artery. Motion of a device in an artery, for example by inserting, manipulating, negotiating bends and so forth, may contribute to dissection, perforation, denuding intima, or disrupting the interior elastic lamina.
Blood flow through a renal artery may be temporarily occluded for a short time with minimal or no complications. However, occlusion for a significant amount of time can be avoided in some cases to prevent injury to the kidney such as ischemia. It can be beneficial to avoid occlusion altogether or, if occlusion is beneficial, to limit the duration of occlusion, for example, to 2-5 minutes.
Based on the above-described challenges of (1) renal artery intervention, (2) consistent and stable placement of the treatment element against the vessel wall, (3) effective application of treatment across the vessel wall, (4) positioning and potentially repositioning the treatment apparatus to allow for multiple treatment locations, and (5) avoiding or limiting duration of blood flow occlusion, various independent and dependent properties of the renal vasculature that may be of interest include, for example, (a) vessel diameter, vessel length, intima-media thickness, coefficient of friction, and tortuosity, (b) distensibility, stiffness, and modulus of elasticity of the vessel wall, (c) peak systolic, end-diastolic blood flow velocity, as well as the mean systolic-diastolic peak blood flow velocity, and mean/max volumetric blood flow rate, (d) specific heat capacity of blood and/or of the vessel wall, thermal conductivity of blood and/or of the vessel wall, and/or thermal convectivity of blood flow past a vessel wall treatment site and/or radiative heat transfer, (e) renal artery motion relative to the aorta induced by respiration, patient movement, and/or blood flow pulsatility, and (f) the takeoff angle of a renal artery relative to the aorta. These properties will be discussed in greater detail with respect to the renal arteries. However, dependent on the apparatus, systems, and methods utilized to achieve renal neuromodulation, such properties of the renal arteries also may guide and/or constrain design characteristics.
As noted above, an apparatus positioned within a renal artery can conform to the geometry of the artery. Renal artery vessel diameter, DRA, typically is in a range of about 2-10 mm, with most of the patient population having a DRA of about 4 mm to about 8 mm and an average of about 6 mm. Renal artery vessel length, LRA, between its ostium at the aorta/renal artery juncture and its distal branchings, generally is in a range of about 5-70 mm, and a significant portion of the patient population is in a range of about 20-50 mm. Since the target renal plexus is embedded within the adventitia of the renal artery, the composite intima-media thickness (i.e., the radial outward distance from the artery's luminal surface to the adventitia containing target neural structures) also is notable and generally is in a range of about 0.5-2.5 mm, with an average of about 1.5 mm. Although a certain depth of treatment can be important to reach the target neural fibers, the treatment typically is not too deep (e.g., the treatment can be less than about 5 mm from inner wall of the renal artery) so as to avoid non-target tissue and anatomical structures such as the renal vein.
An additional property of the renal artery that may be of interest is the degree of renal motion relative to the aorta induced by respiration and/or blood flow pulsatility. A patient's kidney, which is located at the distal end of the renal artery, may move as much as four includes cranially with respiratory excursion. This may impart significant motion to the renal artery connecting the aorta and the kidney. Accordingly, the neuromodulatory apparatus can have a unique balance of stiffness and flexibility to maintain contact between a cryo-applicator or another thermal treatment element and the vessel wall during cycles of respiration. Furthermore, the takeoff angle between the renal artery and the aorta may vary significantly between patients, and also may vary dynamically within a patient (e.g., due to kidney motion). The takeoff angle generally may be in a range of about 30°-135°.
The foregoing embodiments of cryotherapeutic devices are configured to accurately position the cryo-applicators in and/or near the renal artery and/or renal ostium via a femoral approach, transradial approach, or another suitable vascular approach. In any of the foregoing embodiments described above with reference to
V. Conclusion
The above detailed descriptions of embodiments of the present technology are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present technology to the precise form(s) disclosed above. Various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the present technology, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while stages may be presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform stages in a different order. The various embodiments described herein and elements thereof may also be combined to provide further embodiments. In some cases, well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of embodiments of the present technology.
Where the context permits, singular or plural terms may also include the plural or singular terms, respectively. Moreover, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in reference to a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of the items in the list. Additionally, the terms “comprising” and the like are used throughout the disclosure to mean including at least the recited feature(s) such that any greater number of the same feature(s) and/or additional types of other features are not precluded. It will also be appreciated that various modifications may be made to the described embodiments without deviating from the present technology. Further, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the present technology have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the present technology. Accordingly, the disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3125096 | Antiles et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3298371 | Lee | Jan 1967 | A |
3901241 | Allen, Jr. | Aug 1975 | A |
3924628 | Droegemueller et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3935348 | Smith | Jan 1976 | A |
4154246 | LeVeen | May 1979 | A |
4169464 | Obrez | Oct 1979 | A |
4275734 | Mitchiner | Jun 1981 | A |
4406656 | Hattler et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4419819 | Dickhudt et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4602624 | Naples et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4649936 | Ungar et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4660571 | Hess et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4706671 | Weinrib | Nov 1987 | A |
4709698 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4764504 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4781682 | Patel | Nov 1988 | A |
4796643 | Nakazawa et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4819661 | Heil, Jr. et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4860769 | Fogarty et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4921484 | Hillstead | May 1990 | A |
4957118 | Erlebacher | Sep 1990 | A |
4961377 | Bando et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4976711 | Parins et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4995868 | Brazier | Feb 1991 | A |
5002067 | Berthelsen et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5011488 | Ginsburg | Apr 1991 | A |
5016808 | Heil, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5052998 | Zimmon | Oct 1991 | A |
5071407 | Termin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5108390 | Potocky et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108525 | Gharibadeh | Apr 1992 | A |
5133365 | Heil, Jr. et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5156151 | Imran | Oct 1992 | A |
5163928 | Hobbs et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5188602 | Nichols | Feb 1993 | A |
5188619 | Myers | Feb 1993 | A |
5190539 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5209723 | Twardowski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5228442 | Imran | Jul 1993 | A |
5239999 | Imran | Aug 1993 | A |
5249585 | Turner et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263492 | Voyce | Nov 1993 | A |
5263493 | Avitall | Nov 1993 | A |
5279299 | Imran | Jan 1994 | A |
5296510 | Yamada et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300068 | Rosar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5300099 | Rudie | Apr 1994 | A |
5308323 | Sogawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318525 | West et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324284 | Imran | Jun 1994 | A |
5327905 | Avitall | Jul 1994 | A |
5334181 | Rubinsky et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342301 | Saab | Aug 1994 | A |
5345031 | Schwartz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5345936 | Pomeranz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354297 | Avitall | Oct 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365926 | Desai | Nov 1994 | A |
5368591 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383856 | Bersin | Jan 1995 | A |
5387233 | Alferness et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5397304 | Truckai | Mar 1995 | A |
5397339 | Desai | Mar 1995 | A |
5405374 | Stein | Apr 1995 | A |
5411546 | Bowald et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417355 | Broussalian et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423744 | Gencheff et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425364 | Imran | Jun 1995 | A |
5462545 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5476495 | Kordis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476498 | Ayers | Dec 1995 | A |
5484400 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487385 | Avitall | Jan 1996 | A |
5487757 | Truckai et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497774 | Swartz et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5507743 | Edwards et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509909 | Moy | Apr 1996 | A |
5523092 | Hanson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529820 | Nomi et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5545193 | Fleischman et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545200 | West et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5545475 | Korleski | Aug 1996 | A |
5549661 | Kordis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564440 | Swartz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571147 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575766 | Swartz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575810 | Swanson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582609 | Swanson et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588964 | Imran et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591132 | Carrie | Jan 1997 | A |
5599345 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609151 | Mulier et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617854 | Munsif | Apr 1997 | A |
5624392 | Saab | Apr 1997 | A |
5626576 | Janssen | May 1997 | A |
5628775 | Jackson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5636634 | Kordis et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5637090 | McGee et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642736 | Avitall | Jul 1997 | A |
5672174 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676662 | Fleischhacker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680860 | Imran | Oct 1997 | A |
5681280 | Rusk et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5687723 | Avitall | Nov 1997 | A |
5688266 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690611 | Swartz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697928 | Walcott et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700282 | Zabara | Dec 1997 | A |
5707400 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709874 | Hanson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715818 | Swartz et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722401 | Pietroski et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5725512 | Swartz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727555 | Chait | Mar 1998 | A |
5730127 | Avitall | Mar 1998 | A |
5730741 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755760 | Maguire et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755761 | Obino | May 1998 | A |
5758505 | Dobak, III et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772590 | Webster, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792415 | Hijlkema | Aug 1998 | A |
5807391 | Wijkamp | Sep 1998 | A |
5807395 | Mulier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814028 | Swartz et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823955 | Kuck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827242 | Follmer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827268 | Laufer | Oct 1998 | A |
5837003 | Ginsburg | Nov 1998 | A |
5842984 | Avitall | Dec 1998 | A |
5846355 | Spencer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853389 | Hijlkema | Dec 1998 | A |
5860920 | McGee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860970 | Goddard et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860974 | Abele | Jan 1999 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865815 | Tihon | Feb 1999 | A |
5868735 | Lafontaine | Feb 1999 | A |
5871523 | Fleischman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871531 | Struble | Feb 1999 | A |
5873865 | Horzewski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879295 | Li et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882346 | Pomeranz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893885 | Webster et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5902299 | Jayaraman | May 1999 | A |
5910129 | Koblish et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931848 | Saadat | Aug 1999 | A |
5938694 | Jaraczewski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941823 | Chait | Aug 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951471 | de la Rama et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954719 | Chen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957961 | Maguire et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968085 | Morris et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971979 | Joye et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972026 | Laufer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980516 | Mulier et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993462 | Pomeranz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997526 | Giba et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004269 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004348 | Banas et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009877 | Edwards | Jan 2000 | A |
6012457 | Lesh | Jan 2000 | A |
6024752 | Horn et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032077 | Pomeranz | Feb 2000 | A |
6042578 | Dinh et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048329 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064902 | Haissaguerre et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066134 | Eggers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071729 | Jeffries et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074339 | Gambale et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074361 | Jacobs | Jun 2000 | A |
6074378 | Mouri et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076012 | Swanson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078840 | Stokes | Jun 2000 | A |
6078841 | Kuzma | Jun 2000 | A |
6090104 | Webster, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094596 | Morgan | Jul 2000 | A |
6096036 | Bowe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099524 | Lipson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106522 | Fleischman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117101 | Diederich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125302 | Kuzma | Sep 2000 | A |
6129750 | Tockman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132456 | Sommer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135999 | Fanton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146381 | Bowe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149620 | Baker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161048 | Sluijter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161049 | Rudie et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161543 | Cox et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164283 | Lesh | Dec 2000 | A |
6190356 | Bersin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214002 | Fleischman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219577 | Brown, III et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223070 | Chait | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224592 | Eggers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228109 | Tu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237355 | Li | May 2001 | B1 |
6241722 | Dobak et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246912 | Sluijter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6270496 | Bowe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273886 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280441 | Ryan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283951 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283959 | Lalonde et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290696 | Lafontaine | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292695 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308090 | Tu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314325 | Fitz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322558 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322559 | Daulton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325797 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355029 | Joye et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364904 | Smith | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385472 | Hall et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409742 | Fulton, III et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430426 | Avitall | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6432102 | Joye et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6442415 | Bis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451045 | Walker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468297 | Williams et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480747 | Schmidt | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6488679 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496737 | Rudie et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6497703 | Korteling et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500174 | Maguire et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506189 | Rittman, III et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511492 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514226 | Levin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6514245 | Williams et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6514249 | Maguire et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517533 | Swaminathan | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527739 | Bigus et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529756 | Phan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530935 | Wensel et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537271 | Murray et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540734 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542781 | Koblish et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546280 | Osborne | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551309 | LePivert | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6562031 | Chandrasekaran et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562034 | Edwards et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6572612 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6575933 | Wittenberger et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592581 | Bowe | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602242 | Fung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6602247 | Lalonde | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6605061 | VanTassel et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607520 | Keane | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610046 | Usami et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610083 | Keller et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613046 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616624 | Kieval | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622731 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623515 | Mulier et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628976 | Fuimaono et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635054 | Fjield et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648879 | Joye et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652517 | Hall et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666858 | Lafontaine | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692490 | Edwards | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6702811 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711444 | Koblish | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6736835 | Pellegrino et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745080 | Koblish | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755823 | Lalonde | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758830 | Schaer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6773433 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780183 | Jimenez, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786901 | Joye et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802840 | Chin et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6817999 | Berube et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824543 | Lentz | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850801 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869431 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875209 | Zvuloni et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882886 | Witte et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885888 | Rezai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6890329 | Carroll et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893436 | Woodard et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6893438 | Hall et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899711 | Stewart et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905510 | Saab | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908462 | Joye et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909920 | Lokhoff et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6923808 | Taimisto | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939346 | Kannenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6941953 | Feld et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949097 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960206 | Keane | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6960207 | Vanney et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972016 | Hill, III et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981382 | Lentz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013169 | Bowe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013170 | Bowe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7058456 | Pierce | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7060062 | Joye et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7081112 | Joye et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081115 | Taimisto | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7104988 | Altman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110828 | Kolberg et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115134 | Chambers | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149574 | Yun et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156840 | Lentz et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162303 | Levin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7201738 | Bengmark | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7211082 | Hall et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221979 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7254451 | Seifert et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7285119 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291146 | Steinke et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7306590 | Swanson | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311705 | Sra | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7357797 | Ryba | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7381200 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390894 | Weinshilboum et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395116 | Mehdizadeh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7435248 | Taimisto et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7517349 | Truckai et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526343 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7542808 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7604631 | Reynolds | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7617005 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637903 | Lentz et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7641679 | Joye et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647115 | Levin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647124 | Williams | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653438 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7682319 | Martin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7717948 | Demarais et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729782 | Williams et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747334 | Bly et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758571 | Saadat | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771421 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778703 | Gross et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785289 | Rios et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789877 | Vanney | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850685 | Kunis et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7861725 | Swanson | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867219 | Chambers | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7881807 | Schaer | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890188 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
1015285 | Mayse et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
7959630 | Taimisto et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972327 | Eberl et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8019435 | Hastings et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
1026392 | Vrba et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
1026408 | Ingle | Oct 2011 | A1 |
1027023 | Rizq et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
1028227 | Lafontaine | Nov 2011 | A1 |
8062284 | Booth | Nov 2011 | B2 |
1031990 | Thenuwara et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
8088125 | Lafontaine | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8100859 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8123739 | McQueen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131371 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131372 | Levin et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140170 | Rezai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145317 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150518 | Levin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150519 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150520 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175711 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192428 | Truckai et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8257351 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8337492 | Kunis et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8380275 | Kim et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8473067 | Hastings et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8475441 | Babkin et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8480664 | Watson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8571665 | Moffitt | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8663211 | Fourkas et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8740895 | Mayse et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8777943 | Mayse et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010005785 | Sachse | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007070 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010020174 | Koblish | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010031971 | Dretler et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020004631 | Jenkins et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004644 | Koblish | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020045893 | Lane et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062124 | Keane | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087208 | Koblish et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120258 | Lalonde | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139379 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165532 | Hill et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183682 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193735 | Stiger | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036752 | Joye et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050681 | Pianca et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060762 | Zvuloni et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060858 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030074039 | Puskas | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088240 | Saadat | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088244 | Swanson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125790 | Fastovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153967 | Koblish et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158584 | Cates et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181897 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199863 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204187 | Hintringer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216792 | Levin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233099 | Danaek et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010289 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024392 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030375 | Pierce | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049181 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082978 | Harrison et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040215186 | Cornelius et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050010095 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050080409 | Young et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050187579 | Danek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050228460 | Levin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240117 | Zvuloni et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060074403 | Rafiee | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084962 | Joye et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095029 | Young et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100618 | Chan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060135870 | Webler | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135953 | Kania et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060206150 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212027 | Marrouche et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241366 | Falwell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247611 | Abboud et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247744 | Nest et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271111 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070083194 | Kunis et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185445 | Nahon et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070213793 | Hayes, Jr. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070265687 | Deem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070299433 | Williams et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080045921 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080097398 | Mitelberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108975 | Appling et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109011 | Thenuwara et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140174 | Oepen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080208182 | Lafontaine et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080255539 | Booth | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288039 | Reddy | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300584 | Lentz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080300587 | Anderson | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306475 | Lentz et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312644 | Fourkas et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319513 | Pu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090018534 | Taimisto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036948 | Levin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090182316 | Bencini | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182317 | Bencini | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090209949 | Ingle et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090281533 | Ingle et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287202 | Ingle et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090299355 | Bencini et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306650 | Govari et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090312606 | Dayton et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030112 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049184 | George et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100069900 | Shirley et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100087 | Mazzone et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106148 | Joye et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114269 | Wittenberger et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125266 | Deem et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130970 | Williams et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137860 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137952 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168777 | Stangenes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174282 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179512 | Chong et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179526 | Lawrence | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179527 | Watson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191112 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198203 | Kuck et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204692 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222851 | Deem et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222854 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100234838 | Watson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249766 | Saadat | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256621 | Babkin et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261990 | Gillis et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280507 | Babkin et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110144639 | Govari | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160719 | Govari et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110306851 | Wang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010607 | Malecki et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029509 | Smith | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029510 | Haverkost | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029511 | Smith et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029513 | Smith et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035615 | Koester et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078076 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089047 | Ryba et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101553 | Reddy | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116382 | Ku et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120116383 | Mauch et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123261 | Jenson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120123406 | Edmunds et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130289 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130345 | Levin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130360 | Buckley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130368 | Jenson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136417 | Buckley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136418 | Buckley et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143097 | Pike, Jr. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120143293 | Mauch et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150267 | Buckley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172837 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191083 | Moll et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197246 | Mauch | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120253336 | Littrup et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277842 | Kunis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290053 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310065 | Falwell et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120310239 | Stewart et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323233 | Maguire et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130053876 | Ogle | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085360 | Grunewald | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090637 | Sliwa | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130090650 | Jenson et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130123770 | Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165920 | Weber et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130165921 | Sutermeister et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172872 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130172879 | Sutermeister et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184696 | Fourkas et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184773 | Libbus | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130253628 | Chaska | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130274614 | Shimada | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274730 | Anderson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274731 | Anderson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274737 | Wang | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282000 | Parsonage | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282084 | Mathur | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130289686 | Masson | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304047 | Grunewald | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304052 | Rizq | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304062 | Chan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130345688 | Babkin | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140046313 | Pederson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058376 | Horn | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140066914 | Lafontaine | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140213873 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214018 | Behar et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221805 | Wang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140243821 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201469401 | May 2010 | CN |
102198015 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102274075 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102488552 | Jun 2012 | CN |
202386778 | Aug 2012 | CN |
202426649 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202537649 | Nov 2012 | CN |
202538132 | Nov 2012 | CN |
102885648 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102885649 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102908188 | Feb 2013 | CN |
102908189 | Feb 2013 | CN |
202761434 | Mar 2013 | CN |
202843784 | Apr 2013 | CN |
4406451 | Sep 1995 | DE |
29909082 | Jul 1999 | DE |
10252325 | May 2004 | DE |
10257146 | Jun 2004 | DE |
0132344 | Jan 1985 | EP |
0132344 | Jan 1986 | EP |
0510624 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0655225 | May 1995 | EP |
510624 | Jul 1995 | EP |
732080 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0779079 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0821602 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0868923 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0728495 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0916360 | May 1999 | EP |
0955012 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1042990 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1129670 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1164963 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1233716 | Aug 2002 | EP |
963191 | Aug 2003 | EP |
757575 | Sep 2003 | EP |
873760 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1389477 | Feb 2004 | EP |
779079 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1502553 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1559362 | Aug 2005 | EP |
0778043 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1042990 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1733689 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1802370 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1009303 | Jun 2009 | EP |
2208474 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2263588 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2519173 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2558016 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2598069 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2598070 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2598071 | Jun 2013 | EP |
2608837 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2664295 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2694158 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2759275 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2760532 | Aug 2014 | EP |
228367 | Feb 1925 | GB |
1422535 | Jan 1976 | GB |
2283678 | May 1995 | GB |
2289414 | Nov 1995 | GB |
355137141 | Oct 1980 | JP |
718099 | Feb 1980 | SU |
1153901 | May 1985 | SU |
1329781 | Aug 1987 | SU |
1378835 | Mar 1988 | SU |
1771725 | Jun 1990 | SU |
WO-9115254 | Oct 1991 | WO |
WO-9220291 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-9421168 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO-9513111 | May 1995 | WO |
WO-9520416 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO-9525472 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO-9600036 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO-9632980 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9638196 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9717892 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9717892 | May 1997 | WO |
WO-9725011 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-9736548 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9802201 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO-9833469 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-9843530 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9900060 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9905979 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9927862 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO-9956801 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO-9962413 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0001313 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO-0056237 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0067832 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0122897 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0137723 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0137746 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0164145 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0170114 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-0180758 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0200128 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0204042 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0207625 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0207628 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-0213710 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-0245608 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO-02058576 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02083017 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-02087453 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02089687 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02089908 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03020334 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03061496 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-03082080 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004100813 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2005030072 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005038357 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005041748 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005051216 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005070491 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005110528 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006020920 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO-2006041881 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO-2006065949 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2006092000 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2006096272 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2006124177 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007001981 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007008954 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007128064 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2008101244 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO-2008131037 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2009121017 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2010048676 | May 2010 | WO |
WO-2010091701 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO-2010120835 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2011015218 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011019838 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011056684 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011082278 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011082279 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2011130534 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO-2012016135 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012016137 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012058430 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2012075156 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2012130337 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2012131107 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO2012148966 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2012154219 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2012154796 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2013016203 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013028993 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2013030807 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013040201 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013049601 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO-2013074683 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013101452 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2013106054 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2013106859 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2013109318 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2013158676 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO2013158678 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO2013165920 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO2013154776 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO-2014036160 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2014036163 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2014056460 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO2014081910 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Beale et al., “Minimally Invasive Treatment for Varicose Veins: A Review of Endovenous Laser Treatment and Radiofrequency Ablation”. Lower Extremity Wounds 3(4), 2004, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/046845, mailed Dec. 16, 2011, 16 pages. |
Miller, Reed, “Finding a Future for Renal Denervation With Better Controlled Trials.” Pharma & Medtech Business Intelligence, Article # 01141006003, Oct. 6, 2014, 4 pages. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, “Renal Denervation and Symplicity HTN-3: “Dubium Sapientiae Initium” (Doubt Is the Beginning of Wisdom)”, Circulation Research, 2014; 115: 211-214. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: How Did We Get Here, Present Status, and Future Directions.” Circulation. 2014; 129: 1440-1450. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: 12-Month Results of the EnligHTN I First-in-Human Study Using a Multielectrode Ablation System.” Hypertension. 2014; 64: 565-572. |
Doumas, Michael et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: The Dust Has Not Yet Settled.” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2014; vol. 16, No. 6, 2 pages. |
Messerli, Franz H. et al. “Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Dead or Alive?” Healio: Cardiology today's Intervention, May/Jun. 2014, 2 pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US02/07661, Aug. 13, 2002, 5 Pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US03/031339, Feb. 18, 2004, 3 Pages. |
International Search Report, PCT/US01/044977, Jun. 7, 2002, 6 Pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/071144, mailed Mar. 6,2014, 10 pages. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 13159256, Date Mailed: Oct. 17, 2013, 6 pages. |
Ahmed, Humera et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation Using an Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter for the Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, No. 7, 2012, pp. 758-765. |
Avitall et al., “The creation of linear contiguous lesions in the atria with an expandable loop catheter,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999; 33; pp. 972-984. |
Blessing, Erwin et al., Cardiac Ablation and Renal Denervation Systems Have Distinct Purposes and Different Technical Requirements, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, 1 page. |
ClinicalTrials.gov, Renal Denervation in Patients with uncontrolled Hypertension in Chinese (2011), 6pages. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01390831. |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation Controller & Accessories, Version of Apr. 2003, (6 pages). |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's Maestro 30000 Cardiac Ablation System, Version of Oct. 17, 2005 , (4 pages). |
Holmes et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Spectrum and Interventional Considerations, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2: 4, 2009, 10 pages. |
Kandarpa, Krishna et al., “Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures”, Third Edition, pp. 194-210 (2002). |
Mount Sinai School of Medicine clinical trial for Impact of Renal Sympathetic Denervation of Chronic Hypertension, Mar. 2013, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628198. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP1802370, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 20 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2037840, Granted Dec. 7, 2011, Date of Opposition Sep. 7, 2012, 25 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2092957, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 26 pages. |
Oz, Mehmet, Pressure Relief, TIME, Jan. 9, 2012, 2 pages. <www.time.come/time/printout/0,8816,2103278,00.html>. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control or Resistant Hypertension, Int. Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 8 pages. |
Prochnau, Dirk et al., Catheter-based renal denervation for drug-resistant hypertension by using a standard electrophysiology catheter; Euro Intervention 2012, vol. 7, pp. 1077-1080. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Incidence, Management, and Outcome in Significant Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Am. J. Cardiol , 93, Jun. 1, 2004, 4 pages. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Curr. Opin. Cardio. 20 :484-490, 2005. |
Schneider, Peter A., “Endovascular Skills—Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery,” Second Edition Revised and Expanded, 10 pages, (2003). |
ThermoCool Irrigated Catheter and Integrated Ablation System, Biosense Webster (2006), 6 pages. |
Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 2002, 4 pages. |
Wittkampf et al., “Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation,” Journal of the American Heart Associate, 1989, 80: pp. 962-968. |
Zheng et al., “Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2001, pp. 401-410. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,110, filed Aug. 29, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,209, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,233, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,243, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,253, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,255, filed Sep. 13, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,292, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,327, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,335, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,336, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Levin et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,356, filed Sep. 14, 2012, Demarais et al. |
“2011 Edison Award Winners.” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2011, 6 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/BestNewProduct—2011.php>. |
“2012 top 10 advances in heart disease and stroke research: American Heart Association/America Stroke Association Top 10 Research Report.” American Heart Association, Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages, <http://newsroom.heart.org/news/2012-top-10-advances-in-heart-241901>. |
“Ardian(R) Receives 2010 EuroPCR Innovation Award and Demonstrates Further Durability of Renal Denervation Treatment for Hypertension.” PR Newswire, Jun. 3, 2010, 2 pages, <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ardianr-receives-2010-europer-innovation-award-and-demonstrates-further-durability-of-renal-denervation-treatment-for-hypertension-95545014.html>. |
“Boston Scientific to Acquire Vessix Vascular, Inc.: Company to Strengthen Hypertension Program with Acquisition of Renal Denervation Technology.” Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life—Investor Relations, Nov. 8, 2012, 2 pages, <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1756108>. |
“Cleveland Clinic Unveils Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2012: Experts Predict Ten Emerging Technologies that will Shape Health Care Next Year.” Cleveland Clinic, Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media—relations/library/2011/2011-10-6-cleveland-clinic-unveils-top-10-medical-innovations-for-2012.aspx>. |
“Does renal denervation represent a new treatment option for resistant hypertension?” Interventional News, Aug. 3, 2010, 2 pages. <http://www.cxvascular.com/in-latest-news/interventional-news---latest-news/does-renal-denervation-represent-a-new-treatment-option-for-resistant-hypertension>. |
“Iberis—Renal Sympathetic Denervation System: Turning innovation into quality care.” [Brochure], Terumo Europe N.V., 2013, Europe, 3 pages. |
“Neurotech Reports Announces Winners of Gold Electrode Awards.” Neurotech business report, 2009. 1 page. <http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/goldelectrodes09.html>. |
“Quick. Consistent. Controlled. OneShot renal Denervation System” [Brochure], Covidien: positive results for life, 2013, (n.l.), 4 pages. |
“Renal Denervation Technology of Vessix Vascular, Inc. been acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) to pay up to $425 Million.” Vessix Vascular Pharmaceutical Intelligence: A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics, Nov. 8, 2012, 21 pages, <http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/tag/vessix-vascular/>. |
“The Edison AwardsI M” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2013, 2 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/Awards.php>. |
“The Future of Renal denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.” St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2012, 12 pages. |
“Vessix Renal Denervation System: So Advanced It's Simple.” [Brochure], Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life, 2013, 6 pages. |
Asbell, Penny, “Conductive Keratoplasty for the Correction of Hyperopia.” Tr Am Ophth Soc, 2001, vol. 99, 10 pages. |
Badoer, Emilio, “Cardiac afferents play the dominant role in renal nerve inhibition elicited by volume expansion in the rabbit.” Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, vol. 274, 1998, 7 pages. |
Bengel, Frank, “Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine.” Circulation, vol. 99, 1999,7 pages. |
Benito, F., et al. “Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in infants.” Heart, 78:160-162 (1997). |
Bettmann, Michael, Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Circulation, vol. 97, 1998, 4 pages. |
Bohm, Michael et al., “Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: the Global Symplicity registry.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Brosky, John, “EuroPCR 2013: CE-approved devices line up for renal denervation approval.” Medical Device Daily, May 28, 2013, 3 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines—article&forceid=83002>. |
Davis, Mark et al., “Effectiveness of Renal Denervation Therapy for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, No. 3, 2013, 11 pages. |
Dibona, G.F. “Sympathetic nervous system and kidney in hypertension.” Nephrol and Hypertension, 11: 197-200 (2002). |
Dubuc, M., et al., “Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter.” J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2:285-292 (1998). |
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,700; Mailed on Feb. 5, 2013, 61 pages. |
Geisler, Benjamin et al., “Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, col. 60, No. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Gelfand, M., et al., “Treatment of renal failure and hypertension.” U.S. Appl. No. 60/442,970, Jan. 29, 2003, 23 pages. |
Gertner, Jon, “Meet the Tech Duo That's Revitalizing the Medical Device Industry.” FAST Company, Apr. 15, 2013, 6:00 AM, 17 pages, <http://www.fastcompany.com/3007845/meet-tech-duo-thats-revitalizing-medical-device-industry>. |
Golwyn, D. H., Jr., et al. “Percutaneous Transcatheter Renal Ablation with Absolute Ethanol for Uncontrolled Hypertension or Nephrotic Syndrome: Results in 11 Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.” JVIR, 8: 527-533 (1997). |
Hall, W. H., et al. “Combined embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal tumor.” Am. J. Roentgenol,174: 1592-1594 (2000). |
Han, Y.-M, et al., “Renal artery ebolization with diluted hot contrast medium: An experimental study.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12: 862-868 (2001). |
Hansen, J. M., et al. “The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation.” Clin. Sci, 87: 13-19 (1994). |
Hendee, W. R. et al. “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research: The Challenge and Response.” American Medical Association White Paper (1988) 39 pages. |
Hering, Dagmara et al., “Chronic kidney disease: role of sympathetic nervous system activation and potential benefits of renal denervation.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Huang et al., “Renal denervation prevents and reverses hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension in rats.” Hypertension 32 (1998) pp. 249-254. |
Imimdtanz, “Medtronic awarded industry's highest honour for renal denervation system.” The official blog of Medtronic Australasia, Nov. 12, 2012, 2 pages, <http://97waterlooroad.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/medtronic-awarded-industrys-highest-honour-for-renal-denervation-system/>. |
Kaiser, Chris, AHA Lists Year's Big Advances in CV Research, medpage Today, Dec. 18, 2012, 4 pages, <http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/36509>. |
Kompanowska, E., et al., “Early Effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: Natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow.” J Physiol, 531. 2:527-534 (2001). |
Lee, S.J., et al. “Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.” Yonsei Med J, 40:545-549 (1999). |
Linz, Dominik et al., “Renal denervation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ventricular ischemia in pigs.” Heart Rhythm, vol. 0, No. 0, 2013, 6 pages. |
Lustgarten, D.L.,et al., “Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.” Progr Cardiovasc Dis, 41:481-498 (1999). |
Mabin, Tom et al., “First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2012, 5 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Circulation, 2013, 25 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation.” European Heart Journal, 2013, 9 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.” Hypertension, 2012, 6 pages. |
Medical-Dictionary.com, Definition of “Animal Model,” http://medical-dictionary.com (search “Animal Model”), 2005, 1 page. |
Medtronic, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Jun. 28, 2011) 44 pages. |
Millard, F. C., et al, “Renal Embolization for ablation of function in renal failure and hypertension.” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 65, 729-734, (1989). |
Oliveira, V., et al., “Renal denervation normalizes pressure and baroreceptor reflex in high renin hypertension in conscious rats.” Hypertension, 19:II-17-II-21 (1992). |
Ong, K. L., et al. “Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999-2004.” Hypertension, 49: 69-75 (2007) (originally published online Dec. 11, 2006). |
Ormiston, John et al., “First-in-human use of the OneShot I M renal denervation system from Covidien.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2013, 4 pages. |
Ormiston, John et al., “Renal denervation for resistant hypertension using an irrigated radiofrequency balloon: 12-month results from the Renal Hypertension Ablation System (RHAS) trial.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 5 pages. |
Pedersen, Amanda, “TCT 2012: Renal denervation device makers play show and tell.” Medical Device Daily, Oct. 26, 2012, 2 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines—article&forceid=80880>. |
Peet, M., “Hypertension and its Surgical Treatment by bilateral supradiaphragmatic splanchnicectomy” Am J Surgery (1948) pp. 48-68. |
Renal Denervation (RDN), Symplicity RDN System Common Q&A (2011), 4 pages, http://www.medtronic.com/rdn/mediakit/RDN%20FAQ.pdf. |
Schauerte, P., et al. “Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation.” Circulation, 102:2774-2780 (2000). |
Schlaich, Markus et al., “Renal Denervation in Human Hypertension: Mechanisms, Current Findings, and Future Prospects.” Curr Hypertens Rep, vol. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Schmid, Axel et al., “Does Renal Artery Supply Indicate Treatment Success of Renal Denervation.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 36, 2013, 5 pages. |
Schmieder, Roland E. et al., “Updated ESH position paper on interventional therapy of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Sievert, Horst, “Novelty Award EuroPCR 2010.” Euro PCR, 2010, 15 pages. |
Solis-Herruzo et al., “Effects of lumbar sympathetic block on kidney function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome,” J. Hepatol. 5 (1987), pp. 167-173. |
Stella, A., et al., “Effects of reversible renal deneravation on haemodynamic and excretory functions on the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney in the cat.” Hypertension, 4:181-188 (1986). |
Stouffer, G. A. et al., Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 62, 2013, 6 pages. |
Swartz, J.F., et al., “Radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathway atrial insertion sites.” Circulation, 87: 487-499 (1993). |
Uchida, F., et al., “Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on parasympathetic denervation: A comparison of three different ablation sites.” PACE, 21:2517-2521 (1998). |
Verloop, W. L. et al., “Renal denervation: a new treatment option in resistant arterial hypertension.” Neth Heart J., Nov. 30, 2012, 6 pages, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547427/>. |
Weinstock, M., et al., “Renal denervation prevents sodium rentention and hypertension in salt sensitive rabbits with genetic baroreflex impairment.” Clinical Science, 90:287-293 (1996). |
Wilcox, Josiah N., Scientific Basis Behind Renal Denervation for the Control of Hypertension, ICI 2012, Dec. 5-6, 2012. 38 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen et al., “Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial.” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, 2013, 9 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen, “The St. Jude Renal Denervation System Technology and Clinical Review.” The University of Adelaide Australia, 2012, 24 pages. |
Zuern, Christine S., “Impaired Cardiac Baroflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.046, 24 pages. |
Allen, E.V., Sympathectomy for essential hypertension, Circulation, 1952, 6:131-140. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 56, Jul. 1975, pp. 208-217. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation on Proximal Water and Sodium Reabsorption,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 57, Apr. 1976, pp. 1104-1107. |
Bhandari, A. and Ellias, M., “Loin Pain Hemaluria Syndrome: Pain Control with RFA to the Splanchanic Plexus,” The Pain Clinc, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327. |
Curtis, John J. et al., “Surgical Therapy for Persistent Hypertension After Renal Transplantation” Transplantation, 31:125-128 (1981). |
Dibona, Gerald F. et al., “Neural Control of Renal Function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, The American Physiological Society 1997, pp. 75-197. |
Dibona, Gerald F., “Neural Control of the Kidney—Past, Present and Future,” Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture, Hypertension 2003, 41 part 2, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 621-624. |
Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., “Effects of Complete Renal Denervation and Selective Afferent Renal Denervation on the Hypertension Induced by Intrenal Norepinephrine Infusion in Conscious Rats”, Journal of Hypertension 1989, 7: 447-455. |
Katholi, Richard E., “Renal Nerves in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension in Experimental Animals and Humans,” Am J. Physiol. vol. 245, 1983, the American Physiological Society 1983, pp. F1-F14. |
Krum, Henry et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: A Mulitcentre Safety and Proof-of Principle Cohort Study,” Lancet 2009; 373:1275-81. |
Krum, et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension.” New England Journal of Med, Aug. 2009, 361;9. |
Luippold, Gerd et al., “Chronic Renal Denervation Prevents Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetic Rats”, Nephrol Dial Transplant, vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 342-347. |
Mahfoud et al. “Treatment strategies for resistant arterial hypertension” Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:725-731. |
Osborn, et al., “Effect of Renal Nerve Stimulation on Renal Blood Flow Autoregulation and Antinatriuresis During Reductions in Renal Perfusion Pressure,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimentla Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on Patients Suffering From Nephritis,” Feb. 27, 1935;443-458. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on the Level of Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Function in Essential Hypertension,” J. Clin Invest. 1934;14:27-30. |
Rocha-Singh, “Catheter-Based Sympathetic Renal Denervation,” Endovascular Today, Aug. 2009. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implictions for an Old Concept,” Hypertension, 2009; 54:1195-1201. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension,” N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): 932-934. |
Smithwick, R.H. et al., “Splanchnicectomy for Essential Hypertension,” Journal Am Med Assn, 1953; 152:1501-1504. |
Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators; Krum H, Barman N, Schlaich M, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011 ;57(5):911-917. |
Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, “Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): A Randomised Controlled Trial”; Lancet, Dec. 4, 2010, vol. 376, pp. 1903-1909. |
United States Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages. |
Valente, John F. et al., “Laparoscopic Renal Denervation for Intractable ADPKD-Related Pain”, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16:160. |
Wagner, C.D. et al., “Very Low Frequency Oscillations in Arterial Blood Pressure After Autonomic Blockade in Conscious Dogs,” Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul lntegr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039. |
510K Summary of CryoGen Cryosurgery System, filed with FDA Jul. 3, 1997—approved Oct. 1, 1997, 1997, 5 pages. |
CO2/Gas Composite Regulator, Sep. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://www.genuineinnovations.com/composite-regulator.html>. |
CryoGen SS&E: HerOption Uterine Cryoblatin Therapy System, filed with FDA Aug. 15, 2000—approved Apr. 20, 2001,1999, 84 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 12, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057514, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057502, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 28, 2011, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057508, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 14, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057504, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 20, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057483, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 23, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057490, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 6, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057497, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 13, 2013, International Application No. PCT/US2012/063411, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 16, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057511, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 9, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057523, 15 pages. |
Lura Harrison, Ph.D. et al., “Cryosurgical Ablation of the A-V Node-His Bundle—A New Method for Producing A-V Block,” Circulation, vol. 55, 1977 pp. 463-470. |
Medical Grade Gas Dispenser, Sep. 6, 2011, 1 page, <http://www.abd-inc.com/Frame-904990-page1namepage904990.html?refresh=1205442262133>. |
Sesia G. et al., “The use of nitrous oxide as a freezing agent in cryosurgery of the prostate,” International Surgery [Int Surg], vol. 53, 1970, pp. 82-90. |
Special Order Only Thermal Dilution Injector, Obsolete Product, Sep. 6, 2011, 1 page, <http://www.abd-inc.com/Frame-904990-page1namepage904990.html?refresh=1205442262133>. |
Torre, Douglas, MD, “Alternate Cryogens for Cryosurgery,” J. Derm. Surgery, Jun. 1975, pp. 56-58. |
Vo{hacek over (i)}tyna SV, “Cryocatheter-tourniquet,” Meditsinskaia Tekhnika [Med Tekh], vol. 6, 1976, pp. 47-48. |
Claudine Jaboro, “An in vivo study of the biocompatibility of classic and novel device materials on the central nervous system”, (Jan. 1, 2007), ETD Collection for Wayne State University. Paper AA13310737, 2 pages. <http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/dissertations/AA13310737>. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013; European Application No. 12180426.4; Applicant: Medtronic Ardian Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 28, 2013; European Application No. 12180427.2; Applicant: Medtronic Ardian Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 4 pages. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013; Application No. 12180428.0; Applicant: Medtronic Ardian Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013; Application No. 12180430.6; Applicant: Medtronic Ardian Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013; Application No. 12180431.4; Applicant: Medtronic Ardian Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 6 pages. |
European Search Report dated Feb. 22, 2013; Application No. 12180432.2; Applicant: Medtronic Ardian Luxembourg S.a.r.l.; 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 23, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057761, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 20, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057756, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 16, 2012, International Application No. PCT/US2011/057754, 13 pages. |
Lahiri D. et al. “Boron nitride nanotube reinforced polylactide-polycaprolactone copolymer composite: Mechanical properties and cytocompatibility with osteoblasts and macrophages in vitro.” Acta Biomater (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.44, 10 pages. |
Hanker et al., “Biomedical Materials and Devices,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 110, Dec. 4, 1987, Boston Massachusetts, USA, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140142666 A1 | May 2014 | US |