Crystal form of a potassium-competitive acid blocker and preparation method thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10538506
  • Patent Number
    10,538,506
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 9, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 21, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a crystal form of a potassium-competitive acid blocker, that is, 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridine-3-sulfonyl)-1H-pyrrole-3-yl]-N-methyl methylamine fumaric acid salt (which is briefly referred to as a formula I) and a preparation method thereof. An X-ray powder diffraction characteristic peak thereof is shown in FIG. 1. The crystal form that is represented by formula I, provided in the present invention, is stable, reproducible, and is suitable for drug development.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a Section 371 of International Application No. PCT/CN2015/094120, filed Nov. 9, 2015, which was published in the Chinese language on May 19, 2016, under International Publication No. WO 2016/074597 A1, and the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of medicinal chemistry, and specifically relates to a crystal form of a potassium-competitive acid blocker, namely 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate, and a preparation method thereof.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate was developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical company, for use in treating an acid-related disease (e.g., duodenal ulcer, esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, eradicating Helicobacter pylori, peptic ulcer, gastric ulcer). 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), which functions by competitively inhibiting potassium ions in the hydrogen ion/potassium ion-ATP enzyme. It is a reversible potassium antagonist, and belongs to a novel proton pump inhibitor. Its structural formula is as follows:




embedded image


There are currently no reports of crystal forms of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate and preparation methods thereof.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An objective of the present invention is to provide a novel crystal form of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate of formula I.


The crystal form can be identified by its characteristic X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) spectrum.


The crystal form can be characterized by a characteristic X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) spectrum, which comprises peaks at 2θ±0.2°: 12.30, 13.59, 15.34, 18.67, 20.48, 21.69, 25.23, 26.92°, wherein the X-ray powder diffraction spectrum is obtained by using CuKα1 radiation.


Particularly preferably, the characteristic XRPD peaks of the crystal form of the potassium-competitive acid blocker of the present invention are shown in the table below:












2θ (°)















5.24


11.51


11.76


12.30


13.59


14.02


15.34


16.22


16.96


17.48


17.92


18.67


19.20


20.48


20.85


21.69


22.53


23.10


23.59


24.50


25.23


25.65


26.21


26.92


27.80


28.91


30.46


30.68


32.83


33.92


34.92


36.21









Further preferably, the XRPD data of the crystal form is shown as follows:









TABLE 1







X-ray powder diffraction data of the crystal form


of the compound of formula I:









2θ (°)
d-value (Å)
Intensity I/I0 (%)












5.24
16.847
7.3


11.51
7.684
34.3


11.76
7.521
39.5


12.30
7.188
70.1


13.59
6.512
100


14.02
6.312
19.1


15.34
5.770
96.5


16.22
5.460
13.7


16.96
5.224
37.0


17.48
5.069
45.5


17.92
4.945
17.7


18.67
4.749
88.9


19.20
4.620
9.4


20.48
4.333
92.4


20.85
4.256
36.7


21.69
4.094
69.4


22.53
3.943
24.3


23.10
3.847
31.0


23.59
3.768
6.2


24.50
3.630
12.4


25.23
3.528
96.7


25.65
3.471
34.7


26.21
3.398
13.6


26.92
3.310
76.0


27.80
3.207
30.4


28.91
3.086
5.3


30.46
2.932
12.4


30.68
2.912
18.8


32.83
2.726
7.6


33.92
2.640
10.5


34.92
2.567
15.2


36.21
2.479
9.7









Moreover, the crystal form of the compound of formula I can be characterized by a melting point of about 206° C.±3° C. (determined by DSC; evaluated by the starting temperature; with a heating rate of 10 K/minute). The DSC curve obtained is shown in FIG. 2.


In order to allow experimental error, the aforementioned 2θ should be considered to be accurate to 2θ±0.20. In other words, when determining whether or not a crystal sample of a given compound A is the crystal form of the present invention, if the 2θ value of the sample observed in an experiment falls into the ±0.2° range of a 2θ characteristic value, then it should be considered to be the same as the aforementioned characteristic value.


In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method of preparing the crystal form of formula I, comprising the following steps of:


(a) dissolving 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate in a solvent or a mixture of solvents to form a saturated or nearly saturated solution;


(b) storing the solution in order to precipitate the crystal form from the solution, thereby forming a suspension;


(c) separating the precipitate from the suspension; and


(d) drying the precipitate to remove the solvent or the mixture of solvents.


Preferably, the solvent is selected from the group consisting of C1-4-alkanol, water, ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, acetone, methyl tert-butyl ether, N,N-dimethyl formamide, and a mixture of two or more of these solvents.


Preferably, step (a) is carried out at room temperature (about 20° C.) or at a rising temperature about below the boiling point of the solvent used or the mixture of solvents used.


Optionally, one or more poor solvents can be added in step (a) and/or step (b) to reduce the solubility of formula I in the solution.


Preferably, the temperature of the solution in step (b) can be room temperature (about 20° C.) or below.


Optionally, step (b) can be carried out with or without stirring.


Optionally, a seed crystal can be added or not added in step (b).


Preferably, in step (c), the precipitate can be separated by means using known methods, such as filtration, suction filtration, spin filtration, decantation or centrifugation.


Preferably, in step (d), the filtered solvent or the mixture of solvents can be removed under conditions of normal pressure or reduced pressure, heating or no heating.


Another objective of present invention is to provide a pharmaceutical composition comprising the crystal form.


The crystal form of the compound of formula I provided by the present invention is stable, reproducible, and suitable for drug development.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows the X-ray powder diffraction spectrum of the crystal form of the compound of formula I of the present invention; and



FIG. 2 shows the DSC spectrum of the crystal form of the compound of formula I.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In order to further illustrate the present invention, the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the specific examples below, but the scope of the present invention is not limited to these specific examples.


EXAMPLE 1

2 g of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate were dissolved in 20 ml of a mixture of water/isopropanol (volume ratio 3:7), which had been heated to about 70° C. The solution was cooled to about 5° C. in 3 to 5 hours, stirred for 1 hour, and filtered under reduced pressure. The filter cake was dried at 50° C. for 8 hours to obtain 1.4 g of a crystal form. The XRPD spectrum and DSC spectrum of the crystal form are shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, respectively.


EXAMPLE 2

2 g of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate were dissolved in 80 ml of a mixture of ethyl acetate/methanol (volume ratio 1:7), which had been heated to about 70° C. The solution was cooled to about 5° C. in 3 to 5 hours, stirred for 1 hour, and filtered under reduced pressure. The filter cake was dried at 50° C. for 8 hours to obtain 1.2 g of a crystal form. The XRPD spectrum of the crystal form was substantially consistent with FIG. 1, and the DSC spectrum of the crystal form is shown in FIG. 2.


EXAMPLE 3

2 g of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate were dissolved in 80 ml of methanol, which had been heated to about 65° C. The solution was cooled to about 5° C. in 3 to 5 hours, stirred for 1 hour, and filtered under reduced pressure. The filter cake was dried at 50° C. for 8 hours to obtain 1.0 g of a crystal form. The XRPD spectrum of the crystal form was substantially consistent with FIG. 1, and the DSC spectrum of the crystal form is shown in FIG. 2.


EXAMPLE 4

2 g of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate were dissolved in 30 ml of water, which had been heated to about 95° C. The solution was cooled to about 5° C. in 3 to 5 hours, stirred for 1 hour, and filtered under reduced pressure. The filter cake was dried at 50° C. for 8 hours to obtain 1.5 g of a crystal form. The XRPD spectrum of the crystal form was substantially consistent with FIG. 1, and the DSC spectrum of the crystal form is shown in FIG. 2.


Experimental Example 1: Comparative Study on the Crystal Forms of Samples Before and after Stability Testing

The samples were prepared according to the method of Example 1, then were placed under the long-term stability conditions (temperature: 30° C.; humidity: 65%) for six months. The X-ray powder diffractions of the samples were then determined. The X-ray powder diffraction spectra were analyzed, and compared with the starting data. The comparison data are shown in Table 2:









TABLE 2







Comparison of the X-ray powder diffraction data of the samples placed


under long-term stability conditions














For six months






under long-term




At the beginning

stability conditions












Numbers
2θ (°)
d-value (Å)
2θ (°)
d-value (Å)














1
11.51
7.684
11.53
7.671


2
11.76
7.521
11.78
7.508


3
12.30
7.188
12.32
7.180


4
13.59
6.512
13.61
6.503


5
14.02
6.312
14.04
6.304


6
15.34
5.770
15.36
5.765


7
16.22
5.460
16.24
5.455


8
16.96
5.224
16.98
5.219


9
17.48
5.069
17.50
5.065


10
17.92
4.945
17.95
4.939


11
18.67
4.749
18.69
4.745


12
20.48
4.333
20.51
4.328


13
20.85
4.256
20.87
4.254


14
21.69
4.094
21.71
4.091


15
22.53
3.943
22.55
3.941


16
23.10
3.847
23.12
3.845


17
24.50
3.630
24.52
3.628


18
25.23
3.528
25.25
3.525


19
25.65
3.471
25.67
3.468


20
26.21
3.398
26.23
3.396


21
26.92
3.310
26.94
3.308


22
27.80
3.207
27.82
3.205


23
30.46
2.932
30.48
2.931


24
30.68
2.912
30.70
2.910


25
33.92
2.640
33.94
2.639


26
34.92
2.567
34.94
2.567





Conclusion: After comparing the aforementioned XRPD spectra, it was found that there were no obvious changes in d-values and 2θ angles of the diffraction peaks. After being placed under long-term stability conditions (temperature: 30° C.; humidity: 65%) for six months, the crystal forms of three batches of samples had not changed.






Experimental Example 2: Comparative Study on the Crystal Forms Before and after Grinding

The samples were prepared according to the method of Example 1, and the following tests were carried out:


(1) directly grinding the sample for 5 minutes; and


(2) directly micronizing the samples.


The X-ray powder diffraction test was carried out on the aforementioned two samples respectively, and the data was compared with the starting data. The comparison data are shown in Table 3.









TABLE 3







Comparison of the X-ray powder diffraction data of the


samples before and after grinding and micronization












Data obtained after
Data obtained after



At the beginning
grinding
micronization















d-value

d-value

d-value


Numbers
(°)
(Å)
(°)
(Å)
(°)
(Å)
















1
11.51
7.684
11.50
7.691
11.54
7.664


2
11.76
7.521
11.75
7.527
11.79
7.502


3
12.30
7.188
12.29
7.198
12.33
7.175


4
13.59
6.512
13.58
6.517
13.62
6.498


5
14.02
6.312
14.01
6.318
14.05
6.300


6
15.34
5.770
15.33
5.777
15.37
5.762


7
16.22
5.460
16.21
5.465
16.25
5.452


8
16.96
5.224
16.95
5.228
16.99
5.216


9
17.48
5.069
17.47
5.074
17.51
5.062


10
17.92
4.945
17.91
4.950
17.95
4.939


11
18.67
4.749
18.66
4.753
18.70
4.743


12
20.48
4.333
20.47
4.336
20.51
4.328


13
20.85
4.256
20.84
4.260
20.88
4.252


14
21.69
4.094
21.68
4.097
21.72
4.090


15
22.53
3.943
22.52
3.946
22.56
3.939


16
23.10
3.847
23.09
3.850
23.13
3.843


17
24.50
3.630
24.49
3.633
24.53
3.627


18
25.23
3.528
25.22
3.529
25.26
3.523


19
25.65
3.471
25.64
3.472
25.68
3.467


20
26.21
3.398
26.20
3.399
26.24
3.394


21
26.92
3.310
26.91
3.311
26.95
3.307


22
27.80
3.207
27.79
3.209
27.83
3.204


23
30.46
2.932
30.45
2.934
30.49
2.930


24
30.68
2.912
30.67
2.913
30.71
2.910


25
33.92
2.640
33.91
2.642
33.95
2.639


26
34.92
2.567
34.91
2.569
34.95
2.566





Conclusion: The crystal forms of the samples had not changed under the conditions of direct grinding and micronization.






Experimental Example 3: Study on Hygroscopicity of Samples

The samples were prepared according to the method of Example 1, and the following tests were carried out:


(1) placing the sample at 25° C. and 75% humidity;


(2) placing the sample at 25° C. and 92.5% humidity.


The aforementioned two samples were taken and tested at different time points to investigate weight gain of the samples due to moisture absorption. The comparison data are shown in Table 4.









TABLE 4







Comparison of weight gain of the samples


due to moisture absorption










High humidity test 25° C./
High humidity test 25° C./


Items
RH 75% (days)
RH 92.5% (days)















investigated
0
5
10
30
0
5
10
30





weight gain

0.01
0.13
0.12

0.17
0.12
0.19


due to moisture


absorption (%)





Conclusion: The samples did not show hygroscopicity.






Experimental Example 4: Comparative Study on Samples Before and after Stability Testing

The samples were prepared according to the method of Example 1, and then were placed under the long-term stability conditions (temperature: 30° C.±2° C.; humidity: 65%±5%) for six months. The inspection items were tested, and the comparison data are shown in Table 5:









TABLE 5







Comparison of the data of samples placed under long-term stability


conditions









Time (months)










Inspection items
0
3
6





Appearance
White powder
White powder
White powder


HPLC identification
Consistent
Consistent
Consistent


Clarity and color of
Clear and
Clear and
Clear and


dimethylsulfoxide
colorless
colorless
colorless


solution














Related
Maximum
0.03
0.04
0.03


substance
unknown





(%)
single






impurity






Total
0.12
0.13
0.13



impurities













Moisture (%)
0.04
0.08
0.08


Particle size
d (0.5) ≤15 μm
d (0.5) ≤15 μm
d (0.5) ≤15 μm



d (0.9) ≤30 μm
d (0.9) ≤30 μm
d (0.9) ≤30 μm


Content (%)
99.6
100.0
99.7





Conclusion: The samples had good stability under the long-term storage conditions.






Experimental Example 5: Study on Dissolution of Tablets Prepared from Samples

Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) tablets (conventional tabletting) were obtained from the samples prepared according to the method of Example 1. The dissolution rates of the samples were investigated in 0.1 mol/L HCl solution, acetate buffer pH 4.5, phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and purified water, respectively. The comparison data are shown in Table 6:









TABLE 6







Dissolution data of 20 mg specification products (n = 6)









Medium










Acetate buffer
Phosphate












0.1 mol/L HCl
Purified water
pH 4.5
buffer pH 6.8















Time
X
RSD
X
RSD
X
RSD
X
RSD


(min)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)


















10
94
2.8
92
3.4
93
3.4
90
1.7


15
97
2.4
95
3.7
97
2.4
94
1.8


30
99
1.1
95
2.3
99
3.2
95
1.4


45
101
1.2
98
2.1
101
3.7
99
1.0





Conclusion: The dissolution results of the tablets prepared from the samples showed that the dissolution rates of the tabletsin 0.1 mol/L HCl solution, acetate buffer pH 4.5, phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and purified water were all more than 85% at 15 minutes.






It can be seen from the stability inspection data of the samples that the crystal form of the present invention has good stability, and conforms to medicinal quality standards.

Claims
  • 1. A crystal form of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate, wherein the crystal has a characteristic X-ray powder diffraction spectrum comprising diffraction peaks at diffraction angles (2θ±0.2°): 12.30, 13.59, 15.34, 18.67, 20.48, 21.69, 25.23, and 26.92.
  • 2. The crystal form according to claim 1, wherein the characteristic X-ray powder diffraction spectrum further comprises diffraction peaks at diffraction angles (2θ±0.2°):
  • 3. The crystal form according to claim 1, wherein the crystal form has the following d-values at the indicated diffraction angles (2θ±0.2°):
  • 4. The crystal form according to claim 1, wherein a melting point of the crystal form is 206° C.±3° C.
  • 5. A crystal form of 1-[5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl]-N-methylmethanamine fumarate, wherein the crystal has an X-ray powder diffraction spectrum as shown in FIG. 1.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2014 1 0637759 Nov 2014 CN national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/CN2015/094120 11/9/2015 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2016/074597 5/19/2016 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
6627646 Bakale Sep 2003 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
101300229 Nov 2008 CN
104327051 Feb 2015 CN
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Guillory (in Brittain ed.), “Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids” NY:Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1-2, 183-226. (Year: 1999).
CMU Pharmaceutical polymorphism, Internet p. 1-3 Apr. 3, 2008. (Year: 2002).
Singhal et al., “Drug Polymorphism, etc.,” Advanced Drug Reviews 56, p. 335-347. (Year: 2004).
Concise Encyclopedia Chemistry, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 872-873. (Year: 1993).
Jain et al., “Polymorphism in Pharmacy”, Indian Drugs, 23(6) 315-329. (Year: 1986).
Muzaffer et al., “Polymorphism and Drug Availabity, etc.,” J of Pharm. (Lahore), 1(1), 59-66. (Year: 1979).
U.S. Pharmacopia #23, National Formulary #18, 1843-1844. (Year: 1995).
Doelker, english translation of S.T.P. Pratiques, 9(5), 399-409, pp. 1-33. (Year: 1999).
Doelker, english translation of Ann. Pharm. Fr., 60: 161-176, pp. 1-39. (Year: 2002).
Taday et al., “Using Terahertz, etc.,” J of Pharm. Sci., 92(4), 831-838. (Year: 2003).
Otuska et al., “Effect of Polymorphic, etc.,” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 47(6) 852-856. (Year: 1999).
Int'l Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2016 in Int'l Application No. PCT/CN2015/094120.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180282300 A1 Oct 2018 US