Crystal forms of lenvatinib

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10836727
  • Patent Number
    10,836,727
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 15, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 17, 2020
    3 years ago
Abstract
The present invention provides novel crystalline forms of 4-[3-Chloro-4-(N′-cyclopropylureido)phenoxy]-7-methoxyquinoline-6-carboxamide methanesulfonate, as well as methods for their preparation.
Description

This application is a U.S. national stage of PCT/EP2017/073354 filed on 15 Sep. 2017, which claims priority to and the benefit of European Application No. 16189825.9 filed on 21 Sep. 2016, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.)


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Lenvatinib, 4-[3-Chloro-4-(N′-cyclopropylureido)phenoxy]-7-methoxyquinoline-6-carboxamide methanesulfonate, of formula (I)




embedded image


is an anti-cancer drug for the treatment of certain kinds of thyroid cancer, and potentially for other cancers as well. It acts as a multiple kinase inhibitor against the VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 kinases. (Matsui, J. et al., Clinical Cancer Research 14 (17): 5459-65.


Lenvatinib is used for the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer that is either locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, and did not respond to treatment with radioactive iodine (radioiodine)—Haberfeld, H, ed. (2015). Austria-Codex (in German). Vienna: Österreichischer Apothekerverlag; FDA Professional Drug Information for Lenvima.


Lenvatinib is known to have a rather complex polymorphic behavior. Usually the most preferred forms employed in pharmaceutical preparations are the monohydrate or the anhydrous forms. The known crystalline forms, labeled as A, B, C, F, I and DMSO solvate, are described in US 2007/0078159. The amorphous form is described in EP 1 894 918.


There is a strong interest in making available new crystalline forms of Lenvatinib easy to obtain and having the required chemical and physical characteristics.


DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention concerns novel polymorphs of Lenvatinib mesylate, namely to crystal forms characterized by XPRD data and designated as DMSO-1, DMSO-2, ACA-1, ACA-1 HT dry, CHF-1, FOA-1 and H2O-1


The invention is also directed to processes for the preparation of said forms comprising crystallization or re-crystallization from appropriate solvents.


The invention is further directed to pharmaceutical compositions comprising the novel Lenvatinib mesylate crystalline forms.


The new crystal forms were prepared by:

    • extended stirring (slurry) at room temperature of Lenvatinib mesylate suspensions in different antisolvents or solvent/antisolvent mixtures (CHF-1 form);
    • thermal treatment at high temperature of powdered solvate forms (ACA-1-HT form);
    • evaporation of solution or viscous suspension in different temperature/pressure conditions (ACA-1, H2O-1 forms).


The X-ray powder diffractogram (XRPD) has been obtained using the instrument X′Pert PRO PANalytical with single scan, using Kα1 radiation. The diffractogram is measured in reflection mode in the range 3-40° 2θ.


The FT-Raman spectrum (Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy) was recorded with the Nicolet iS50. The excitation source was a Nd-YAG laser (1064 nm) in the backscattering (180°) configuration. The focused laser beam diameter was approx. 50 um and the spectral resolution 4 cm1. The spectra were recorded with a laser power at the sample of approx. 100 mW. DSC analyses were carried out using a differential scanning calorimeter DSC1 Mettler Toledo. The samples were heated at a heating rate of 10 K/min in the temperature range from −25 to 320° C.


The thermograms were obtained using the TGA/DSC1 Mettler Toledo thermo-balance. The samples were heated from 25° C. to 450° C. at 10 K/min.


The crystal forms of Lenvatinib mesylate of the invention have surprisingly interesting chemical-physical characteristics. They are in particular characterized by high level of chemical purity as well as by good handling characteristics for the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions.





DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-1



FIG. 2: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-1



FIG. 3: DSC analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-1



FIG. 4: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-1



FIG. 5: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-1



FIG. 6: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-2



FIG. 7: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-2



FIG. 8: DSC analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-2



FIG. 9: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-2



FIG. 10: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-2



FIG. 11: DVS analysis of Lenvatinib, form DMSO-2



FIG. 12: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1



FIG. 13: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1.



FIG. 14: DSC analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1.



FIG. 15: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1.



FIG. 16: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1



FIG. 17: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1 HT DRY



FIG. 18: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1 HT DRY.



FIG. 19: DSC analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1 HT DRY.



FIG. 20: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1 HT DRY



FIG. 21: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1 HT DRY



FIG. 22: DVS analysis of Lenvatinib, form ACA-1 HT DRY



FIG. 23: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form CHF-1



FIG. 24: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form CHF-1



FIG. 25: DSC analysis of Lenvatinib, form CHF-1



FIG. 26: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form CHF-1



FIG. 27: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form CHF-1



FIG. 28: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form FOA-1



FIG. 29: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form FOA-1



FIG. 30: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form FOA-1



FIG. 31: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form FOA-1



FIG. 32: XRPD spectrum of Lenvatinib, form H2O-1



FIG. 33: FT-Raman spectrum of Lenvatinib, form H2O-1



FIG. 34: DSC analysis of Lenvatinib, form H2O-1



FIG. 35: TGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form H2O-1



FIG. 36: EGA analysis of Lenvatinib, form H2O-1



FIG. 37: DVS analysis of Lenvatinib, form H2O-1





Details of the preparation and of the characterization of the forms of the invention are reported in the following examples.


Example 1: DMSO-1 form

Lenvatinib Mesylate (10-50 mg) was dissolved/suspended in DMSO (100-200 μL), at a temperature ranging from room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent, to give a solution or suspension. The solution/suspension was left under stirring (1-16 hours) and then filtered to obtain a clear solution.


An anti-solvent (0.5-4.0 mL) was added dropwise to the DMSO solution under stirring at a temperature ranging from 20 to 40° C. The anti-solvents used were esters (preferably ethyl formate, ethyl acetate and isopropyl acetate), ethers (preferably THF and 1,2-dimethoxyethane), alcohols (preferably ethanol and 2-propanol), chlorinated solvents (preferably chloroform and dichloromethane), and polar aprotic solvents (preferably acetonitrile).


After 30-180 minutes the precipitate was recovered under vacuum.


The DMSO-1 form of the invention is a hydrate crystal form.


The solid was recovered in a yield ˜96% and high level of chemical purity (>99.5%).


The new crystal form DMSO-1 is characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 1. Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 4.5, 9.0, 22.8, 25.2.


Table 1 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 1







XRPD peak list











Pos.
Height
FWHM
d-spacing
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[cts]
[°2Th.]
[Å]
[%]














4.5429
248.09
0.2007
19.45152
52.51


9.0235
472.43
0.0836
9.80039
100.00


15.4862
92.07
0.5353
5.72203
19.49


17.2633
100.86
0.1004
5.13680
21.35


18.2150
108.87
0.2007
4.87049
23.05


18.7118
35.46
0.4015
4.74229
7.51


19.9001
76.88
0.2676
4.46170
16.27


20.5089
128.13
0.1004
4.33062
27.12


22.8334
334.74
0.0836
3.89474
70.86


25.2097
155.03
0.1338
3.53275
32.82


27.3991
86.96
0.2676
3.25523
18.41


29.4589
56.68
0.3346
3.03214
12.00


32.2925
47.61
0.2676
2.77226
10.08


36.2486
25.73
0.3346
2.47826
5.45


38.6625
47.57
0.1338
2.32891
10.07









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 2 showing the characteristic bands of form DMSO-1.


DSC analysis, shown in FIG. 3, does not evidence important endothermic events.


The TGA analysis, shown in FIG. 4, highlights two weight losses: the first of 11.3% and the second of 12.8%. EGA analysis, shown in FIG. 5, highlights the evolution of water. Above 220° C. the melting/degradation of the sample occur.


Example 2: DMSO-2 Form

Lenvatinib Mesylate (10-50 mg) was dissolved/suspended in DMSO (100-200 μL), at a temperature ranging from room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent, to give a solution or suspension. The solution/suspension was left under stirring (1-16 hours) and then filtered to obtain a clear solution.


An anti-solvent (0.5-4.0 mL) was added dropwise to the DMSO solution under stirring at a temperature ranging from 20 to 40° C. The anti-solvents used were aromatic hydrocarbons (preferably toluene) and apolar ethers (preferably TBME).


After 30-180 minutes the precipitate was recovered under vacuum and washed with TBME.


The Lenvatinib mesylate DMSO-2 of the invention is a hydrate crystal form.


The solid was recovered in a yield ˜96% and high level of chemical purity (>99.5%)


The new crystal form DMSO-2 is characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 13. Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 4.6, 9.2, 15.6, 18.8, 22.1, 23.2.


Table 2 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 2







XRPD peak list











Pos.
Height
FWHM
d-spacing
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[cts]
[°2Th.]
[Å]
[%]














4.5837
606.74
0.0669
19.27843
97.96


9.2097
619.40
0.0502
9.60272
100.00


12.5481
69.54
0.1004
7.05441
11.23


13.8887
109.17
0.5353
6.37637
17.63


15.6527
139.24
0.4015
5.66152
22.48


18.5731
161.14
0.1673
4.77739
26.02


19.2159
114.87
0.1338
4.61900
18.54


21.0908
114.94
0.3346
4.21244
18.56


22.1037
189.44
0.1338
4.02164
30.58


23.1879
336.03
0.0669
3.83600
54.25


25.8843
136.23
0.2007
3.44219
21.99


26.8671
125.45
0.1673
3.31846
20.25


31.7064
17.83
0.8029
2.82215
2.88


37.5436
24.74
0.6691
2.39570
3.99









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 7.


DSC analysis of the Lenvatinib mesylate form DMSO-2, shown in FIG. 8, shows a linear profile with a single event at about 120° C., corresponding to the loss of water and the decomposition occurs without melting.


TGA profile showed a broad weight loss up to above 200° C.: The EGA analysis showed the evolution of water (see FIGS. 9 and 10). The significant high weight loss observed suggested the present of other solvents.


DVS analysis, shown in FIG. 11, reports the percentage change in mass as of the relative humidity change.


The sorption and desorption of water was not reversible. The weight loss of the sample between the start and the end of analysis suggested that water promoted the extrusion of as solvent (the weight loss of 12.34% is compatible with the loss of a 1 mol of DMSO).


Lenvatinib mesylate form DMSO-2 was stored at 60° C. and 75% RH for three days.


Example 3: ACA-1 Form

Lenvatinib Mesylate (10-100 mg) was dissolved in acetic acid (1-10 mL), at a temperature ranging from room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent, to give a solution. The solution was filtered and left to evaporate at 40-80° C. at room pressure in a vial. After three or more days the dry powder was recovered from the vial.


The solid was recovered in a yield ˜99% and high level of chemical purity (>99.5%)


The new form ACA-1 is a solvate crystal form characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 12. Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 5.9, 7.7, 10.9, 11.9, 12.6, 19.4, 22.6, 23.6, 24.5, 25.9, 26.7.


Table 3 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 3







XRPD peak list











Pos.
Height
FWHM
d-spacing
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[cts]
[°2Th.]
[Å]
[%]














5.9675
678.70
0.1171
14.81073
97.27


7.7192
355.59
0.1171
11.45318
50.96


10.0603
45.24
0.2676
8.79263
6.48


10.9027
509.55
0.0502
8.11507
73.03


11.9794
287.64
0.0836
7.38802
41.22


12.5944
188.77
0.2342
7.02859
27.05


13.7300
135.54
0.2007
6.44974
19.43


15.6097
223.70
0.1338
5.67702
32.06


16.1897
78.19
0.2007
5.47493
11.21


17.1620
64.01
0.2676
5.16688
9.17


17.8466
149.98
0.2676
4.97019
21.49


19.3815
697.75
0.1338
4.57992
100.00


20.3435
238.68
0.1673
4.36545
34.21


20.8512
101.26
0.2007
4.26030
14.51


21.4476
220.91
0.2342
4.14316
31.66


22.0163
158.48
0.2676
4.03740
22.71


22.5948
545.13
0.2676
3.93532
78.13


23.5959
427.90
0.2676
3.77059
61.33


24.5324
666.15
0.1171
3.62873
95.47


25.9295
373.65
0.2342
3.43629
53.55


26.7262
200.55
0.2007
3.33563
28.74


28.3633
202.52
0.2342
3.14672
29.02


29.0095
87.47
0.2007
3.07808
12.54


30.9100
76.05
0.2007
2.89302
10.90


32.5188
33.29
0.5353
2.75348
4.77


35.1122
49.25
0.3346
2.55582
7.06


36.3809
26.21
0.4015
2.46955
3.76


37.6634
13.80
0.8029
2.38836
1.98









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 13. The spectrum reports the characteristic bands of form ACA-1.


DSC analysis, shown in FIG. 14, highlights a broad endothermic peak approx. at 118° C. (onset=91.2° C.), associated to the loss of acetic acid, and then a second endothermic peak approx. at 185° C. (onset=169.4° C.), associated to the melting/decomposition of the sample.


The TGA analysis, shown in FIG. 15, highlights a first weight loss of 5.0%, between approx. 90 and 160° C., associated to the loss of 0.5 mol. of acetic acid (as confirmed by EGA analysis FIG. 16) and then two weight losses of acetic acid during the melting/decomposition of the sample, potentially associated to the loss of the solvent mechanically trapped in the solid powder.


Example 4: ACA-1 HT DRY Form

The Lenvatinib mesylate ACA-1 HT DRY of the invention is an anhydrous crystal form which is obtained by heating a sample of the ACA-1 form in an oven at a temperature from 80 to 160° C. and a pressure from 1 to 10−2 atm.


The solid was recovered in a yield ˜99% and high level of chemical purity (>99.5%). The new crystal form ACA-1 HT DRY is characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 17. Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 6.0, 7.7, 11.2, 13.6, 19.4, 20.0, 23.1, 26.9.


Table 4 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 4







XRPD peak list











Pos.
Height
FWHM
d-spacing
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[cts]
[°2Th.]
[Å]
[%]














6.0270
655.37
0.0836
14.66460
100.00


7.7501
350.27
0.1338
11.40758
53.45


11.1820
532.12
0.0836
7.91302
81.19


12.2127
285.80
0.0836
7.24741
43.61


13.6491
73.43
0.4015
6.48778
11.20


15.0621
254.99
0.2342
5.88217
38.91


15.6654
155.17
0.1673
5.65698
23.68


16.8966
135.27
0.1004
5.24743
20.64


17.8266
77.24
0.2676
4.97571
11.79


18.9727
36.96
0.2007
4.67766
5.64


19.4482
244.27
0.2007
4.56436
37.27


20.0429
369.02
0.2342
4.43024
56.31


21.4394
113.38
0.1338
4.14472
17.30


23.0823
497.56
0.1506
3.85330
75.92


23.6943
258.69
0.1673
3.75514
39.47


24.9569
219.93
0.1673
3.56795
33.56


25.2778
155.38
0.1338
3.52338
23.71


26.9899
293.07
0.2007
3.30364
44.72


28.8555
174.53
0.1171
3.09416
26.63


31.6848
30.62
0.2007
2.82403
4.67


33.5104
33.25
0.4015
2.67424
5.07


35.6614
40.96
0.2007
2.51771
6.25


37.5763
27.11
0.4015
2.39370
4.14









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 18. The spectrum reports the characteristic bands of form ACA-1 HT DRY.


DSC analysis, shown in FIG. 19, highlights a first endothermic event (peak approx. at 47° C.) associated to the evaporation of water, and an endothermic peak at 185° C. (onset=167.6° C.) associated to the melting/decomposition of the sample.


The TGA analysis, shown in FIG. 20, highlights an initial weight loss of 4.8%, between approx. 25 and 115° C., reasonably associated to the evaporation of adsorbed water (confirmed by EGA analysis FIG. 21).


The DVS analysis, shown in FIG. 22, reports the percentage change in mass as function of the relative humidity change.


The sorption and desorption of water was not very reversible and the analysis evidenced a small event (probably associated to molecular rearrangements of the API).


The sample recovered at the end of DVS analysis was analyzed by XRPD: its diffractogram was quite amorphous but its crystal structure did not change.


Example 5: CHF-1 Form

A) Lenvatinib Mesylate (100-1000 mg) in an anhydrous form was suspended in chloroform (2-10 mL) and stirred for 1-30 days at a temperature from room temperature to the boiling point of chloroform.


The suspension was recovered under vacuum.


B) Lenvatinib Mesylate (50-100 mg) was dissolved/suspended in acetic acid (100-200 μL), at a temperature ranging from room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent, to give a solution/suspension. The solution/suspension was left under stirring (1-16 hours) and then filtered to obtain a clear solution.


Chloroform (0.5-4.0 mL) was added dropwise to the formic acid solution under stirring at a temperature ranging from 10 to 40° C.


After 1-5 days the precipitate was recovered under vacuum and washed with chloroform.


The new crystal form CHF-1 is characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 23.


Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 4.5, 9.1, 15.7, 16.9, 17.3, 18.2, 18.9, 19.9, 20.5, 21.1, 21.8, 22.4, 22.8, 25.1, 25.6.


Table 5 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 5







XRPD peak list











Pos.
Height
FWHM
d-spacing
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[cts]
[°2Th.]
[Å]
[%]














4.5317
231.81
0.0502
19.49947
24.63


9.0800
941.37
0.0836
9.73959
100.00


10.4474
83.89
0.2007
8.46772
8.91


13.6044
187.54
0.1673
6.50898
19.92


15.2283
363.44
0.0669
5.81836
38.61


15.7388
147.19
0.1338
5.63073
15.64


16.9025
115.41
0.1004
5.24563
12.26


17.2738
263.95
0.1338
5.13368
28.04


18.1760
219.19
0.1004
4.88085
23.28


18.8898
125.23
0.1338
4.69800
13.30


19.8735
263.26
0.0836
4.46761
27.97


20.4742
229.56
0.1673
4.33789
24.39


21.1878
80.34
0.2007
4.19337
8.53


21.8034
349.61
0.2007
4.07635
37.14


22.3367
350.64
0.1673
3.98022
37.25


22.7851
480.34
0.1004
3.90289
51.03


23.1223
253.60
0.1004
3.84672
26.94


25.1448
546.45
0.1171
3.54172
58.05


25.5781
487.93
0.1004
3.48270
51.83


26.1911
142.50
0.1673
3.40255
15.14


26.7025
84.65
0.2007
3.33855
8.99


27.4179
191.40
0.1673
3.25304
20.33


28.1352
64.50
0.2007
3.17171
6.85


29.3075
216.21
0.1673
3.04746
22.97


31.6745
59.36
0.3346
2.82492
6.31


32.0849
96.81
0.2007
2.78972
10.28


32.7288
94.40
0.2007
2.73629
10.03


33.2522
47.13
0.2007
2.69441
5.01


34.1278
72.77
0.2342
2.62726
7.73


35.9972
164.31
0.1673
2.49499
17.45


36.9065
41.47
0.1673
2.43558
4.41


38.4582
59.55
0.2007
2.34081
6.33


39.2658
45.51
0.2007
2.29451
4.83









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 24. The spectrum reports the characteristic bands of form CHF-1.


DSC analysis, shown in FIG. 25, highlights an endothermic peak during the weight loss at approx. 120° C. and the melting at approx. 240° C.


The TGA analysis, shown in FIG. 26, highlights a weight loss approx. of 12%, between approx. 90 and 150° C., and then the decomposition of the sample after 230° C. The EG analysis demonstrates that the weight loss was due to the simultaneously loss of acetic acid and chloroform (see FIG. 27).


Example 6 FOA-1

Lenvatinib Mesylate (50-100 mg) was dissolved in formic acid (100-200 μL), at a temperature ranging from room temperature to the boiling point of the solvent, to give a solution. The solution was left under stirring (1-16 hours) and then filtered to obtain a clear solution.


An anti-solvent (0.5-4.0 mL) was added dropwise to the formic acid solution under stirring at a temperature ranging from 10 to 40° C. The anti-solvents used were esters (preferably ethyl formate, ethyl acetate and isopropyl acetate), ethers (preferably THF and TBME), alcohols (preferably ethanol and 2-propanol), chlorinated solvents (preferably chloroform and dichloromethane), ketones (preferably acetone and MEK), and polar aprotic solvents (preferably acetonitrile). After 30-180 minutes the precipitate was recovered under vacuum and washed with a low-boiling anti-solvent.


The Lenvatinib mesylate FOA-1 of the invention is a solvate crystal form characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 28. Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 4.7, 10.5, 11.9, 16.1, 16.8, 17.5, 21.4, 22.4, 22.9, 23.7, 26.1.


Table 6 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 6







XRPD peak list











Pos.
Height
FWHM
d-spacing
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[cts]
[°2Th.]
[Å]
[%]














4.7056
8638.17
0.0669
18.77925
100.00


9.4334
1236.23
0.0669
9.37550
14.31


9.7391
150.90
0.0669
9.08188
1.75


10.5531
443.43
0.1004
8.38312
5.13


11.0441
52.64
0.1338
8.01150
0.61


11.9195
391.67
0.0836
7.42503
4.53


14.1605
175.57
0.1338
6.25457
2.03


14.8579
220.85
0.0669
5.96256
2.56


15.6284
552.32
0.1171
5.67027
6.39


16.1269
259.53
0.1004
5.49611
3.00


16.7771
451.35
0.0669
5.28455
5.23


17.5530
309.73
0.1338
5.05266
3.59


18.7042
449.91
0.0836
4.74419
5.21


19.5635
309.62
0.1506
4.53771
3.58


20.2838
155.01
0.1004
4.37818
1.79


20.8501
423.22
0.1171
4.26051
4.90


21.3861
1092.05
0.1171
4.15493
12.64


22.4273
645.95
0.1338
3.96434
7.48


22.8760
922.21
0.1338
3.88758
10.68


23.7231
817.47
0.0669
3.75065
9.46


24.4829
135.44
0.0502
3.63596
1.57


24.9629
445.68
0.1338
3.56711
5.16


25.3105
1456.27
0.1338
3.51891
16.86


26.1156
386.09
0.1338
3.41223
4.47


26.7493
101.25
0.1338
3.33281
1.17


27.1948
198.26
0.0836
3.27921
2.30


27.8395
307.72
0.0669
3.20473
3.56


30.0595
71.07
0.2676
2.97291
0.82


31.0830
30.99
0.1338
2.87731
0.36


31.5576
35.35
0.2007
2.83512
0.41


31.9960
61.97
0.1338
2.79726
0.72


34.5173
50.78
0.2676
2.59850
0.59


35.7922
61.68
0.2676
2.50881
0.71


38.2843
42.21
0.4015
2.35104
0.49


39.3257
82.72
0.1338
2.29115
0.96









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 29. The spectrum reports the characteristic bands of form FOA-1.


The TGA analysis, shown in FIG. 30, highlights a combination of two step weight loss of 12.5% (between approx. 60 and 140° C.) and then the melting/degradation of the sample above 220° C. An endothermic peak in the heat-flow during the loss of weight was present.


The EG analysis shows that the weight loss was due to the loss of formic acid and ethyl acetate (see FIG. 31).


Example 7: H2O-1

Lenvatinib Mesylate (100-1000 mg) in anhydrous or hydrate form was suspended in water (10-100 mL) and stirred for 1-7 days at a temperature from room temperature to the boiling point of water. The viscous liquid obtained was dried at a temperature from 30 to 80° C. and at a pressure from 1 to 10−2 atm.


The Lenvatinib mesylate H2O-1 of the invention is an anhydrous crystal form, characterized by evaporation in different conditions of the very viscous liquid obtained stirring for several hours the crystal Form A in pure water. This viscous liquid (similar to a gel) was also obtained by kneading and by heating/cooling cycles of the suspension of Form A in pure water.


The preferred evaporation conditions tested were:

    • 60° C./approx. 1 atm
    • 40° C./10−2 atm
    • 30° C./10−2 atm.


The solid was recovered in a yield ˜99% and high level of chemical purity (>99.5%).


The new crystal form H2O-1 is characterized by the XRPD spectrum shown in FIG. 32. Main peaks at 2theta±0.3 degrees are: 4.5, 5.1, 9.1, 10.5, 19.9, 24.1. Table 7 below shows the significant peaks of the spectrum.









TABLE 7







XRPD peak list











Pos.
FWHM
Area
Height
Rel. Int.


[°2Th.]
[°2Th.]
[cts*°2Th.]
[cts]
[%]














4.516
0.2895
184.8
504.5
100


5.1194
0.2691
44.1
140.81
27.91


6.0497
0.3396
18.39
43.5
8.62


9.0617
0.7832
94.94
96.36
19.1


10.4869
0.6148
83.66
113.89
22.58


14.079
0.7454
95.37
99.99
19.82


16.5072
0.5667
108.54
99.76
19.77


19.8636
0.7933
272.15
178.67
35.42


24.0138
0.68
285.02
218.3
43.27


26.8983
0.7933
102.01
66.97
13.28









FT-Raman analysis returns the spectrum shown in FIG. 33. The spectrum reports the characteristic bands of form H2O-1.


DSC analysis, shown in FIG. 34, highlights two endothermic events: the first peak at approx. 69° C. (onset=34.6° C.) is broad and it was associated to the loss of water; the second peak at 154° C. (onset=140.5° C.) can be associated to the melting of the sample.


The TGA analysis, shown in FIG. 35, highlights a broad weight loss of 6.7%, between approx. 25 and 150° C., associated to the evaporation of water (as confirmed by EG analysis), and then the degradation of the sample after 200° C. (confirmed by EGA analysis FIG. 36).


In DVS analysis, shown in FIG. 22, the sorption and desorption of water was reversible and the analysis did not evidence any event.


The sample recovered at the end of DVS analysis was analyzed by XRPD: its diffractogram did not show any important modification.


The data recorded by DVS analysis showed a mass increased percentage of 10.9% between 40% end 80% RH of the absorption cycle: the sample was classified as hygroscopic.

Claims
  • 1. A polymorph of Lenvatinib mesylate which is a crystal form, designated as form ACA-1 HT DRY, characterized by an XRPD spectrum (Kα1) showing the main peaks at 2theta ±0.3 degrees 6.0, 7.7, 11.2, 13.6, 19.4, 20.0, 23.1, 26.9.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
16189825 Sep 2016 EP regional
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/EP2017/073354 9/15/2017 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2018/054792 3/29/2018 WO A
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
6627646 Bakale Sep 2003 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
1698623 Sep 2006 EP
1797881 Jun 2007 EP
1894918 Mar 2008 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (13)
Entry
Guillory (in Brittain ed.), “Polymorphism in Pharmaceutical Solids” NY:Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1-2, 183-226; 235-238. (Year: 1999).
CMU Pharmaceutical polymorphism, Internet p. 1-3 Apr. 3, 2008. (Year: 2002).
Singhal et al., “Drug Polymorphism, etc.,” Advanced Drug Reviews 56, p. 335-347. (Year: 2004).
Concise Encyclopedia Chemistry, NY: Walter de Gruyter, 872-873. (Year: 1993).
Jain et al., “Polymorphism in Pharmacy”, Indian Drugs, 23(6) 315-329. (Year: 1986).
Muzaffer et al., “Polymorphism and Drug Availabity, etc.,” J of Pharm. (Lahore), 1(1), 59-66. (Year: 1979).
U.S. Pharnnacopia #23, National Formulary #18, 1843-1844. (Year: 1995).
Doelker, english translation of S.T.P. Pratiques, 9(5), 399-409, pp. 1-33. (Year: 1999).
Doelker, english translation of Ann. Pharm. Fr., 60: 161-176, pp. 1-39. (Year: 2002).
Taday et al., “Using Terahertz, etc.,” J of Pharm. Sci., 92(4), 831-838. (Year: 2003).
Otuska et al., “Effect of Polymorphic, etc.,” Chem. Pharm. Bull. 47(6) 852-856. (Year: 1999).
Caira M.R., “Crystalline polymorphism of organic compounds”, Topics in Current Chemistry, vol. 198, Jan. 1, 1998 pp. 163-208.
Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/EP2017/073354 dated Jan. 9, 2018.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190256473 A1 Aug 2019 US