This document relates to computer-based estimation of roadside curbs by image analysis.
Autonomous vehicle navigation is a technology for sensing the position and movement of a vehicle and, based on the sensing, autonomously control the vehicle to navigate towards a destination. Autonomous vehicle navigation can have important applications in transportation of people, goods and services. One of the components of autonomous driving, which ensures the safety of the vehicle and its passengers, as well as people and property in the vicinity of the vehicle, is curb detection.
Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for curb detection by analyzing images of an area surrounding a vehicle. In some embodiments, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors may be used to acquire the images based on reflections captured from the surrounding area. One example implementation can locate the curb position in 3D space accurately and robustly, using point-cloud data captured by a top-mounted LiDAR sensor as input, and output a predicted curve indicating the curb's position that can further be used for autonomous navigation of the vehicle.
In one aspect, the disclosed technology can be used to provide a method for curb detection using LiDAR sensors. This method includes acquiring, based on a scan of an area around a vehicle, a point-cloud frame that includes a description of an intensity of a reflection of the area around the vehicle, selecting a subset of points from the point-cloud frame, seeding each of a plurality of clusters based on the selected points, determining a criterion for each of the selected points, increasing a size of each of the plurality of clusters by including additional points from the point-cloud frame that meet the criterion for the corresponding cluster, identifying a largest cluster of the plurality of clusters upon completion of the increasing step, and detecting a curb based on a boundary of the largest cluster.
In another aspect, the above-described method is embodied in the form of processor-executable code and stored in a computer-readable program medium.
In yet another aspect, a device that is configured or operable to perform the above-described method is disclosed. The device may include a processor that is programmed to implement this method.
The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the description and the claims.
A curb usually refers to an edge where a raised sidewalk meets a street or roadway. In other words, the curb typically reveals the boundary of the drivable area of the road. An accurate and robust curb detection is useful to an autonomous driving system to ensure safe and lawful driving of a vehicle. LiDAR-based curb detection has been an active area of research and implementation in remote sensing and autonomous driving in recent years. For example, curb detection is also useful for autonomous trucks, which typically travel on highways from an origin distribution center to a destination distribution center, but necessarily travel through surface streets for the last mile at the start and end of their journey.
Conventional curb detection implementations use single or accumulated point-cloud frames as input, and employ pointwise features, such as height difference or LiDAR ring radius compression, to detect the curb. However, these conventional methods are focused on directly detecting the curbs, and are therefore susceptible to “curb-like” noises like vehicles on the road or bushes on the roadside.
LiDAR-based curb detection methods face many challenges. For example, most of the curb features (e.g. height difference, ring radius compression, and normal change) become weaker (more difficult to distinguish) when the curb is far away from the sensor. Furthermore, the methods must contend with occlusions and roadside objects having similar features to curbs, and the diversity of curb types that may require laborious parameter tuning in any conventional curb detection method.
Embodiments of the disclosed technology can locate the position of the curb in 3D space based on (a) detecting the curb using road surface expansion to find the boundary of the road instead of directly detecting the curb itself, which is advantageously robust to the noise and occlusions from the road surface, and (b) combining multiple features for robust point clustering.
For example, the point-cloud may be a stored as a pixel array of four dimensions, with three dimensions corresponding to the spatial coordinates of the scanned surrounding area and one dimension representing a strength of the reflection sensed by the LiDAR sensors. In some embodiments, a multi-dimensional array may be used for storage of the point-cloud data, with three spatial dimensions, and additional dimensions corresponding to multiple sensors and their corresponding reflection map.
The flow diagram 100 includes a pre-processing step that takes the single-frame point-cloud from the LiDAR sensor and motion information from the Global Positioning System (GPS) unit and the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) (block 105) to register consecutive point-cloud frames into a common coordinate system, which may then be accumulated (block 110). The accumulated point-cloud (e.g. shown in subfigure 122) is typically much denser than the single-frame point-cloud.
The flow diagram 100 includes the curb detection module (block 130) that estimates features for a subset of the points in the accumulated point-cloud. In some embodiments, the features include the normal at each point, which is estimated by fitting a plane to the point and its nearby points within a certain range (referred to as a “point group”). In other embodiments, the features include the curvature of the point group, which is estimated as λ0/(λ0+λ1+λ2), where λ0<λ1<λ2 are the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix formed by the nearby points. In some embodiments, a k-dimensional tree may be constructed from the accumulated point-cloud to support faster, and more efficient, nearest neighbor searches.
The curb detection module then randomly selects some points as seeds to create clusters, and region-growth is performed from these seeds. In the region-growing process, a point cluster will check its neighboring points to see if they satisfy a criterion associated with height, the normal, and curvature. The points that satisfy the criterion will be added to the cluster, and may become new seeds that are used to expand the cluster. A cluster will be removed from the original accumulated point-cloud when it stops growing, and the curb detection module will start a new cluster from another random seed among the remaining points. In some embodiments, the process may terminate when the total number of remaining points from the original accumulated point-cloud drops below a certain threshold, resulting, for example, in subfigure 132.
In some embodiments, satisfying the criterion may correspond to all the points in a region being connected in some predefined sense. In an example, a smoothness requirement (or condition) needs a value of a certain metric computed for each point to be within some tolerance of an initial or average value. In another example, the criterion may depend on multiple metrics with varying numerical range requirements.
In some embodiments, a 4-connected neighborhood (Von Neumann neighborhood) may be used in the region-growing step. In other embodiments, a 8-connected neighborhood (Moore neighborhood) may be used to grow the region from the initially selected seed points.
The curb detection module relies on the assumption that the largest cluster close to the driving trajectory will always be the drivable area, e.g. the road surface. This assumption holds since the origin of the point-clouds (both the single-frame and accumulated versions) is the center of the LiDAR sensor, which is co-located with the vehicle and its driving trajectory, and provides very strong a priori knowledge about where the road surface will be. Thus, the curb detection module may extract the points that belong to the drivable area by selecting the cluster that contains the most points.
The boundary of the road surface is typically the location of the curb. To obtain the boundary of the drivable area, the curb detection module may compute the concave hull of the largest cluster.
The flow diagram 100 includes a post-processing module (block 140) that uses the curves generated from multiple frames, and fuses that information based on their temporal continuity (to generate, for example, subfigure 142). In some embodiments, the post-processing model may smooth out the curb points using a b-spline fitting function.
In some embodiments, the point-cloud frame may be generated based on the accumulation of multiple single-frame point-clouds. As expected, the accumulated point-cloud frame is much denser than any individual single-frame point-cloud. This enables more robust curb detection, and pre- and post-processing, since noise effects are averaged out due to the accumulation.
The method 300 includes, at step 320, selecting a subset of points from the point-cloud frame, and further includes, at step 330, seeding each of a plurality of clusters based on the selected points, which are the preliminary steps of the region-growing method. The selection process may be implemented in a variety of different ways. For example, in some embodiments, the selected subset may be uniformly distributed throughout the 3D space represented by the point-cloud. In some embodiments, the subset of points may be a fixed pre-determined number (e.g., 10,000 points), and more points may be selected from an area that was detected previously to include a previous estimate of the curb. Advantageously, such a selection allows more computational power to be applied to the area that has a higher probability of including the border between the road surface and the curb. In some embodiments, curb detection may be performed periodically as the vehicle moves along a road, and the subset of points may be selected to be non-co-located compared to a previous selection. Advantageously, such a selection provides a thorough and uniform coverage of the surrounding area over a number of curb detections performed by the system.
The method 300 includes, at step 340, determining a criterion for each of the selected points. In some embodiments, the criterion may include a normal vector and a curvature, which may be computed for each of the selected points and based on neighboring points. In an example, the curvature may be computed as λ0/(λ0+λ1+λ2), where λ0<λ1<λ2 are the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix formed by the neighboring points.
The method 300 includes, at step 350, increasing a size of each of the plurality of clusters by including additional points from the point-cloud frame that meet the criterion for the corresponding cluster. The region-growing method used to increase the size of the clusters is a segmentation method that examines neighboring points (or pixels) of initial seed points and determines whether the point neighbors should be added to the region. The process is iterated on, in the same manner as general data clustering algorithms.
In some embodiments, and in the context of
The method 300 includes, at step 360, identifying, upon completion of the increasing step 350, a largest cluster of the plurality of clusters. Since the LiDAR sensor is co-located with the vehicle and its driving trajectory, there is very strong a priori knowledge, or a high statistical probability, that the largest cluster will correspond to the road surface, and be very close to the driving trajectory (e.g. within a foot, or within 2-20% of the width of the vehicle) or even enclose the driving trajectory. Thus, when the region (or cluster) growing operation is completed, the largest cluster is identified as the road surface. In an example, the region-growing operation may be terminated based on the number of points of the point-cloud frame that have not been considered. In another example, the stopping condition for the region-growing method may be the size of the largest cluster exceeding a certain threshold.
The method 300 includes, at step 370, detecting a curb based on a boundary of the largest cluster. The boundary of the largest cluster, which is typically the road surface, will be the curb location. In some embodiments, the method 300 includes smoothing the boundary of the largest cluster based on a spline function. In other embodiments, the method 300 further includes computing the concave hull of the largest cluster.
In some embodiments, the method 300 may further include determining whether any of the clusters include bounded regions of points, where each point in a bounded region does not meet the criterion. In other words, the region-growing method may have grown the largest cluster around another vehicle on the road, which results in a bounded region with feature values that different from the feature values of the largest (or road) cluster.
Since the bounded region includes points that do not meet the criterion, the method is able to correctly identify that these points are not representative of the curb, but rather of another object in the road (e.g. a vehicle), and the method 300 further includes either adding the points of the bounded region of points to the corresponding cluster, or correctly identifying them as not being part of the curb. This operation ensures that embodiments of the disclosed technology can accurately and robustly detect the curb.
In some embodiments, the movement of the object in the road may be tracked as the vehicle moves along the road. If curb detection is performed periodically, the tracking information may be leveraged to provide a priori information to the region-growing method, which would advantageously result in faster and more accurate processing.
In some embodiments, the detected points corresponding to the vehicle (the “X” marks in
In some embodiments, curve fitting the detected points corresponding to the curb (the “*” marks in
Implementations of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this patent document can be implemented in various systems, digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing unit” or “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.
Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.
This patent document claims priority to and benefits of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/665,994, entitled “CURB DETECTION BY ANALYSIS OF REFLECTION IMAGES,” filed on May 2, 2018. The entire content of the above patent application is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this patent document.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6084870 | Wooten et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6263088 | Crabtree | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6594821 | Banning et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6777904 | Degner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6975923 | Spriggs | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7103460 | Breed | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7689559 | Canright | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7742841 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7783403 | Breed | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7844595 | Canright | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8041111 | Wilensky | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8064643 | Stein | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8082101 | Stein | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8164628 | Stein | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175376 | Marchesotti | May 2012 | B2 |
8271871 | Marchesotti | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8346480 | Trepagnier et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8378851 | Stein | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8392117 | Dolgov | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8401292 | Park | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8412449 | Trepagnier | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8478072 | Aisaka | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8553088 | Stein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8706394 | Trepagnier et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8718861 | Montemerlo et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8788134 | Litkouhi | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8908041 | Stein | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8917169 | Schofield | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8963913 | Baek | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8965621 | Urmson | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8981966 | Stein | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8983708 | Choe et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8993951 | Schofield | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002632 | Emigh | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9008369 | Schofield | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9025880 | Perazzi | May 2015 | B2 |
9042648 | Wang | May 2015 | B2 |
9081385 | Ferguson et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9088744 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9111444 | Kaganovich | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117133 | Barnes | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9118816 | Stein | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9120485 | Dolgov | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9122954 | Srebnik | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9134402 | Sebastian | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9145116 | Clarke | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9147255 | Zhang | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9156473 | Clarke | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176006 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9179072 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9183447 | Gdalyahu | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185360 | Stein | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191634 | Schofield | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214084 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9219873 | Grauer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9233659 | Rosenbaum | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9233688 | Clarke | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9248832 | Huberman | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9248835 | Tanzmeister | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9251708 | Rosenbaum | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9277132 | Berberian | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9280711 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9282144 | Tebay et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9285230 | Silver | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9286522 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9297641 | Stein | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9299004 | Lin | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9315192 | Zhu | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9317033 | Ibanez-guzman et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9317776 | Honda | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9330334 | Lin | May 2016 | B2 |
9342074 | Dolgov | May 2016 | B2 |
9347779 | Lynch | May 2016 | B1 |
9355635 | Gao | May 2016 | B2 |
9365214 | Ben Shalom | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9383753 | Templeton | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9399397 | Mizutani | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9418549 | Kang et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9428192 | Schofield | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9436880 | Bos | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9438878 | Niebla | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443163 | Springer | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9446765 | Ben Shalom | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9459515 | Stein | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9466006 | Duan | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476970 | Fairfield | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9483839 | Kwon | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9490064 | Hirosawa | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9494935 | Okumura et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9507346 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9513634 | Pack et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9531966 | Stein | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9535423 | Debreczeni | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9538113 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9547985 | Tuukkanen | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549158 | Grauer et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9555803 | Pawlicki | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9568915 | Bemtorp | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9587952 | Slusar | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9599712 | Van Der Tempel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600889 | Boisson et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602807 | Crane et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9620010 | Grauer et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9625569 | Lange | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9628565 | Stenneth et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649999 | Amireddy et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9652860 | Maali | May 2017 | B1 |
9669827 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9672446 | Vallesi-Gonzalez | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9690290 | Prokhorov | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9701023 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9712754 | Grauer et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9720418 | Stenneth | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723097 | Harris | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723099 | Chen | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723233 | Grauer et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726754 | Massanell et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9729860 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9738280 | Rayes | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9739609 | Lewis | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9746550 | Nath | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9753128 | Schweizer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9753141 | Grauer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9754490 | Kentley et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9760837 | Nowozin et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9766625 | Boroditsky et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9769456 | You et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9773155 | Shotton et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9779276 | Todeschini et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9785149 | Wang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9805294 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9810785 | Grauer et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9823339 | Cohen | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9953236 | Huang | Apr 2018 | B1 |
10147193 | Huang | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10223806 | Yi et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10223807 | Yi et al. | Mar 2019 | B1 |
10410055 | Wang et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
20030114980 | Klausner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030174773 | Ciu | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040264763 | Mas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070136408 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070183661 | El-Maleh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183662 | Wang | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230792 | Shashua | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070286526 | Abousleman | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080249667 | Horvitz | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090040054 | Wang | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090087029 | Coleman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100049397 | Lin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100111417 | Ward | May 2010 | A1 |
20100226564 | Marchesotti | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100281361 | Marchesotti | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110142283 | Huang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110206282 | Aisaka | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247031 | Jacoby | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120041636 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120105639 | Stein | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140076 | Rosenbaum | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120274629 | Baek | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314070 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130051613 | Bobbitt et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130083959 | Owechko | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130182134 | Grundmann et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204465 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130266187 | Bulan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130329052 | Chew | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140072170 | Zhang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104051 | Breed | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142799 | Ferguson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143839 | Ricci | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145516 | Hirosawa | May 2014 | A1 |
20140198184 | Stein | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140321704 | Partis | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140334668 | Saund | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150062304 | Stein | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150120244 | Ma | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150269438 | Samarsekera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150310370 | Burry | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150353082 | Lee et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160008988 | Kennedy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026787 | Nairn et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160037064 | Stein | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160094774 | Li | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160118080 | Chen | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129907 | Kim | May 2016 | A1 |
20160165157 | Stein | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160210528 | Duan | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160275766 | Venetianer et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160321381 | English | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160334230 | Ross et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160342837 | Hong et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160347322 | Clarke et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160375907 | Erban | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170053169 | Cuban et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170061632 | Linder et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170124476 | Levinson et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170134631 | Zhao et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170177951 | Yang et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170301104 | Qian | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170305423 | Green | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170318407 | Meister | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180151063 | Pun | May 2018 | A1 |
20180158197 | Dasgupta | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180260956 | Huang | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180283892 | Behrendt | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180373980 | Huval | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190025853 | Julian | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190065863 | Luo et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066329 | Yi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066330 | Yi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190066344 | Yi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190108384 | Wang et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190132391 | Thomas | May 2019 | A1 |
20190132392 | Liu | May 2019 | A1 |
20190210564 | Han | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190210613 | Sun | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190236950 | Li | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190266420 | Ge | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104463872 | Mar 2015 | CN |
104850834 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105354829 | Feb 2016 | CN |
105957076 | Sep 2016 | CN |
106340197 | Jan 2017 | CN |
106778749 | May 2017 | CN |
106781591 | May 2017 | CN |
108010360 | May 2018 | CN |
109685821 | Apr 2019 | CN |
2608513 | Sep 1977 | DE |
890470 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1754179 | Feb 2007 | EP |
2448251 | May 2012 | EP |
2463843 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2761249 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2946336 | Nov 2015 | EP |
2993654 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3081419 | Oct 2016 | EP |
100802511 | Feb 2008 | KR |
1991009375 | Jun 1991 | WO |
2005098739 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098751 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2005098782 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2010109419 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2013045612 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014111814 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014166245 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2014201324 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015083009 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2015103159 | Jul 2015 | WO |
2015125022 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015186002 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016090282 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016135736 | Sep 2016 | WO |
2017079349 | May 2017 | WO |
2017079460 | May 2017 | WO |
2017013875 | May 2018 | WO |
2019040800 | Feb 2019 | WO |
2019084491 | May 2019 | WO |
2019084494 | May 2019 | WO |
2019140277 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2019168986 | Sep 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Carle, Patrick J.F. et al. “Global Rover Localization by Matching Lidar and Orbital 3D Maps.” IEEE, Anchorage Convention District, pp. 1-6, May 3-8, 2010. (Anchorage Alaska, US). |
Caselitz, T. et al., “Monocular camera localization in 3D LiDAR maps,” European Conference on Computer Vision (2014) Computer Vision—ECCV 2014. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8690, pp. 1-6, Springer, Cham. |
Mur-Artal, R. et al., “ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System,” IEEE Transaction on Robotics, Oct. 2015, pp. 1147-1163, vol. 31, No. 5, Spain. |
Sattler, T. et al., “Are Large-Scale 3D Models Really Necessary for Accurate Visual Localization?” CVPR, IEEE, 2017, pp. 1-10. |
Engel, J. et la. “LSD-SLAM: Large Scare Direct Monocular SLAM,” pp. 1-16, Munich. |
Levinson, Jesse et al., Experimental Robotics, Unsupervised Calibration for Multi-Beam Lasers, pp. 179-194, 12th Ed., Oussama Khatib, Vijay Kumar, Gaurav Sukhatme (Eds.) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014. |
Geiger, Andreas et al., “Automatic Camera and Range Sensor Calibration using a single Shot”, Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1-8, 2012 IEEE International Conference. |
Zhang, Z. et al. A Flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (vol. 22, Issue: 11, pp. 1-5, Nov. 2000). |
Bar-Hillel, Aharon et al. “Recent progress in road and lane detection: a survey.” Machine Vision and Applications 25 (2011): pp. 727-745. |
Schindler, Andreas et al. “Generation of high precision digital maps using circular arc splines,” 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Alcala de Henares, 2012, pp. 246-251. doi: 10.1109/IVS.2012.6232124. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'07—IEEE Conference, pp. 1-8, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Harel, Jonathan and Koch, Christof, “Image Signature: Highlighting Sparse Salient Regions”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 194-201, 2012. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Dynamic Visual Attention: Searching For Coding Length Increments”, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 21, pp. 681-688, 2008. |
Li, Yin and Hou, Xiaodi and Koch, Christof and Rehg, James M. and Yuille, Alan L., “The Secrets of Salient Object Segmentation”, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 280-287, 2014. |
Zhou, Bolei and Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Phase Discrepancy Analysis of Object Motion”, Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 225-238, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Yuille, Alan and Koch, Christof, “Boundary Detection Benchmarking: Beyond F-Measures”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR'13, vol. 2013, pp. 1-8, IEEE, 2013. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Color Conceptualization”, Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 265-268, ACM, 2007. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “Thumbnail Generation Based on Global Saliency”, Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics, ICCN 2007, pp. 999-1003, Springer Netherlands, 2008. |
Hou, Xiaodi et al., “A Meta-Theory of Boundary Detection Benchmarks”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1302.5985, pp. 1-4, 2013. |
Li, Yanghao et al., “Revisiting Batch Normalization for Practical Domain Adaptation”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1603.04779, pp. 1-12, 2016. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Laying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Demystifying Neural Style Transfer”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1701.01036, pp. 1-8, 2017. |
Hou, Xiaodi and Zhang, Liqing, “A Time-Dependent Model of Information Capacity of Visual Attention”, International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 127-136, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. |
Wang, Panqu and Chen, Pengfei and Yuan, Ye and Liu, Ding and Huang, Zehua and Hou, Xiaodi and Cottrell, Garrison, “Understanding Convolution for Semantic Segmentation”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1702.08502, pp. 1-10, 2017. |
Li, Yanghao and Wang, Naiyan and Liu, Laying and Hou, Xiaodi, “Factorized Bilinear Models for Image Recognition”, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1611.05709, pp. 1-9, 2016. |
Hou, Xiaodi, “Computational Modeling and Psychophysics in Low and Mid-Level Vision”, California Institute of Technology, pp. 1-125, 2014. |
Spinello, Luciano, Triebel, Rudolph, Siegwart, Roland, “Multiclass Multimodal Detection and Tracking in Urban Environments”, Sage Journals, vol. 29 Issue 12, pp. 1498-1515 (pp. 1-18), Article first published online: Oct. 7, 2010; Issue published: Oct. 1, 2010. |
Barth, Matthew et al., “Recent Validation Efforts for a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model”, Transportation Research Record 1750, Paper No. 01-0326, College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, pp. 1-11, date unknown. |
Ahn, Kyoungho, Hesham Rakha, “The Effects of Route Choice Decisions on Vehicle Energy Consumption and Emissions”, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg, VA 24061, pp. 1-34, date unknown. |
Ramos, Sebastian, et al., “Detecting Unexpected Obstacles for Self-Driving Cars: Fusing Deep Learning and Geometric Modeling”, arXiv: 1612.06573v1 [cs.CV] pp. 1-8, Dec. 20, 2016. |
Schroff, Florian, Dmitry Kalenichenko, James Philbin, (Google), “FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering”, CVPR, pp. 1-10, 2015. |
Dai, Jifeng, Kaiming He, Jian Sun, (Microsoft Research), “Instance-aware Semantic Segmentation via Multi-task Network Cascades”, CVPR, pp. 1, 2016. |
Huval, Brody et al., “An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Driving”, arXiv: 1504.01716v3 [cs.RO] pp. 1-7, Apr. 17, 2015. |
Li, Tian, “Proposal Free Instance Segmentation Based on Instance-aware Metric”, Department of Computer Science, Cranberry-Lemon University, Pittsburgh, PA., pp. 1-2, date unknown. |
Norouzi, Mohammad, et al., “Hamming Distance Metric Learning”, Departments of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Toronto, pp. 1-9, date unknown. |
Jain, Suyong Dutt, Grauman, Kristen, “Active Image Segmentation Propagation”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, pp. 1-10, Jun. 2016. |
MacAodha, Oisin, Campbell, Neill D.F., Kautz, Jan, Brostow, Gabriel J., “Hierarchical Subquery Evaluation for Active Learning on a Graph”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1-8, 2014. |
Kendall, Alex, Gal, Yarin, “What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision”, arXiv: 1703.04977v1 [cs.CV] pp. 1-11, Mar. 15, 2017. |
Wei, Junqing, John M. Dolan, Bakhtiar Litkhouhi, “A Prediction- and Cost Function-Based Algorithm for Robust Autonomous Freeway Driving”, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 1-6, Jun. 21-24, 2010. |
Welinder, Peter, et al., “The Multidimensional Wisdom of Crowds” http://www.vision.caltech.edu/visipedia/papers/WelinderEtaINIPS10.pdf, pp. 1-9, 2010. |
Yu, Kai et al., “Large-scale Distributed Video Parsing and Evaluation Platform”, Center for Research on Intelligent Perception and Computing, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, arXiv:1611.09580v1 [cs.CV], pp. 1-7, Nov. 29, 2016. |
Guameri, P. et al., “A Neural-Network-Based Model for the Dynamic Simulation of the Tire/Suspension System While Traversing Road Irregularities,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 1549-1563, Sep. 2008. |
C. Yang, Z. Li, R. Cui and B. Xu, “Neural Network-Based Motion Control of an Underactuated Wheeled Inverted Pendulum Model,” in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 25, No. 11, pp. 2004-2016, Nov. 2014. |
Richter, Stephan R. et al., “Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Games”, Intel Labs, European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 1-16, 2016. |
Athanasiadis, Thanos, et al., “Semantic Image Segmentation and Object Labeling”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1-15, Mar. 2007. |
Cordts, Marius et al., “The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding”, Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, Nevada, pp. 1-29, 2016. |
Somani, Adhira et al., “DESPOT: Online POMDP Planning with Regularization”, Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, pp. 1-9, date unknown. |
Paszke, Adam et al., Enet: A deep neural network architecture for real-time semantic segmentation. CoRR, abs/1606.02147, pp. 1-10, 2016. |
Szeliski, Richard, “Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications” http://szeliski.org/Book/, pp. 1-2, 2010. |
Moreira, Adriano, “Concave HuLL: A K-Nearest Enighbours Approach for the Computation of the Region Occupied by a Set of Points”, International Conference on Computer Graphis Theory and Applications, (GRAPP), Barcelona, Spain, Mar. 8-11, 2007, pp. 1-8. |
Chinese Application No. 201910337021.5, First Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2021, pp. 1-14. |
Chinese Patent Office, First Office Action for CN 201910337021.5, dated Mar. 2, 2022, 25 pages with machine translation. |
Chinese Application 201910337021.5 Notice of Grant dated Aug. 5, 2022 pp. (6 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190340447 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62665994 | May 2018 | US |