Curcumin nanoparticle and preparation and application thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11696901
  • Patent Number
    11,696,901
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 25, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 11, 2023
    9 months ago
  • Inventors
    • Jing; Siqun
    • Zhong; Ruimin
    • Zhang; Junyan
  • Original Assignees
    • SHAOGUAN UNIVERSITY
  • Examiners
    • Wax; Robert A
    • Tcherkasskaya; Olga V.
Abstract
Disclosed is a curcumin nanoparticle, including curcumin as core material and a wall material, where a weight ratio of the curcumin to the wall material is (5.5-7.5):100, and the wall material includes gum arabic and zein in a weight ratio of (1-5):5. The disclosure further provides a method of making the curcumin nanoparticle and a curcumin beverage containing the curcumin nanoparticle.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of priority from Chinese Patent Application No. 202010467969.5, filed on May 28, 2020. The content of the aforementioned application, including any intervening amendments thereto, is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


TECHNICAL FIELD

This application relates to production of functional food, and more particularly to a curcumin nanoparticle and a preparation and application thereof.


BACKGROUND

Curcumin (cur) is a kind of polyphenolic compounds exacted from rhizomes of turmeric, and has a symmetric molecular structure composed of two o-methylated phenols and heptadiene with β-diketone structure. The curcumin powder is yellow-orange, and has a slightly bitter taste. In view of the strong coloring property and low toxicity, the curcumin has been widely applied as a natural pigment in the fields of food, textile and cosmetic. Recently, the curcumin has been demonstrated to have anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidation, anti-neoplastic, anti-depression and antiviral activities, and play an important role in protecting cardiovascular system, repairing brain damage, and relieving symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Unfortunately, the coloring property of the curcumin is not stable enough since it has poor water solubility and is prone to being affected by external factors like temperature, metal ions, pH and light. Particularly under the exposure to natural light, the aqueous curcumin solution is extremely prone to degradation to lose its pharmacological activities and coloring property. In consideration of this, the curcumin is greatly limited in the practical application, especially in the production of liquid food.


SUMMARY

An object of this application is to provide a curcumin nanoparticle and a preparation and application thereof to overcome the above-mentioned defects in the prior art.


Technical solutions of this application are specifically described as follows.


In a first aspect, this application provides a curcumin nanoparticle, comprising:


curcumin as core material; and


a wall material;


wherein a weight ratio of the curcumin to the wall material is (5.5-7.5):100; and


the wall material comprises gum arabic and zein in a weight ratio of (1-5):5.


In a second aspect, this application provides a method of preparing the curcumin nanoparticle, comprising:


(1) dissolving the zein with 85% ethanol followed by magnetic stirring for 1 h and centrifugation to remove insoluble impurities to produce a zein solution; and adding the curcumin to the zein solution followed by stirring for 30 min to produce a curcumin stock solution;


(2) dissolving gum arabic with a 0.3 g/L zinc sulfate solution at 60° C. under stirring to produce an aqueous gum arabic stock solution, wherein the zinc sulfate solution is prepared by dissolving zinc sulfate with water in a water bath at 60° C., and a volume ratio of water in the aqueous gum arabic stock solution to ethanol in the curcumin stock solution is (1.5-3.5):1;


(3) adding the curcumin stock solution to the aqueous gum arabic stock solution in a trickle manner followed by stirring for 30 min to produce a curcumin nanoparticle dispersion;


(4) concentrating the curcumin nanoparticle dispersion obtained in step (3) by rotary evaporation to obtain a concentrated curcumin nanoparticle dispersion; and


(5) subjecting the concentrated curcumin nanoparticle dispersion to freeze drying to produce the curcumin nanoparticle.


In some embodiments, in step (2), the volume ratio of the water in the aqueous gum arabic stock solution to the ethanol in the curcumin stock solution is 3:1.


In some embodiments, a weight ratio of curcumin to the wall material is (5.5-7.5):100, and a weight ratio of the gum arabic to the zein in the wall material is (1-5):5.


In some embodiments, the weight ratio of curcumin to the wall material is 7:100, and the weight ratio of the gum arabic to the zein in the wall material is 4:5.


In a third aspect, this application provides a curcumin beverage, consisting of:


15% by weight of Tribute Citrus concentrate;


0.05%-0.25% by weight of xanthan gum;


0.2%-1% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle;


0.2%-1% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate;


0.05%-0.25% by weight of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC-Na);


0.1% by weight of citric acid;


10% by weight of xylitol; and


water.


In some embodiments, the curcumin beverage consists of:


15% by weight of Tribute Citrus concentrate;


0.15% by weight of xanthan gum;


0.8% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle;


0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate;


0.15% by weight of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose;


0.1% by weight of citric acid;


10% by weight of xylitol; and


water.


In a fourth aspect, this application provides a method of preparing the curcumin beverage, comprising:


(1) peeling and coring Tribute Citrus fruits followed by squeezing with a juicer to produce a Tribute Citrus juice; filtering the Tribute Citrus juice twice with a double gauze to collect a filtrate; and concentrating the filtrate by rotary evaporation to a solid content of 70% to produce the Tribute Citrus concentrate;


(2) mixing the curcumin nanoparticle, starch sodium octenyl succinate and the Tribute Citrus concentrate by stirring to obtain a first mixture;


(3) homogenizing the first mixture obtained in step (2) by a homogenizer to obtain a first homogenized product;


(4) compounding the first homogenized product obtained in step (3) with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, citric acid and xylitol to produce a second mixture;


(5) homogenizing the second mixture obtained in step (4) by the homogenizer to obtain a second homogenized product;


(6) heating the second homogenized product in a water bath at 80° C. for 15 min followed by degassing to obtain a degassed product; and


(7) bottling and sterilizing the degassed product obtained in step (6) to produce the curcumin beverage.


In some embodiments, in step (3), the homogenization is performed at 25 MPa.


In some embodiments, in step (5), the homogenization is performed at 5 MPa.


In some embodiments, in step (7), the sterilization is performed at 121° C. for 10 min.


Compared to the prior art, this application has the following beneficial effects.


1. The curcumin nanoparticle prepared by the method provided herein has significantly enhanced photostability, rendering it suitable as a functional pigment in the production of functional drinks for delaying senescence.


2. The curcumin beverage provided herein can improve the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reduce the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), showing anti-aging and antioxidant effects.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

This disclosure will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings for better understanding and implementation of the technical solutions of this disclosure.



FIG. 1 shows an absorption curve of a curcumin nanoparticle according to Example 1 of this disclosure.



FIG. 2 shows a standard curve of the curcumin nanoparticle according to Example 1 of this disclosure.



FIG. 3 schematically shows the screening of the optimal concentration of zinc ions according to Example 1 of the disclosure.



FIG. 4 shows the effect of a water/ethanol volume ratio on the embedding ratio of the curcumin nanoparticle according to Experimental Example 1 of the disclosure.



FIG. 5 shows the effect of a gum arabic/zein weight ratio on the embedding ratio of the curcumin nanoparticle according to the Experimental Example 1 of the disclosure.



FIG. 6 shows the effect of a weight ratio of curcumin to a combination of gum arabic and zein on the embedding ratio of the curcumin nanoparticle according to the Experimental Example 1 of the disclosure.



FIG. 7 shows the comparison between the curcumin nanoparticle and curcumin standard in terms of curcumin retention rate under natural light according to Experimental Example 1 of the disclosure.



FIG. 8 is a 100× micrograph of the curcumin nanoparticle treated under conditions of experimental group 1 according to Experimental Example 2 of the disclosure.



FIG. 9 is a 100× micrograph of the curcumin nanoparticle treated under conditions of experimental group 2 according to Experimental Example 2 of the disclosure.



FIG. 10 is a 100× micrograph of the curcumin nanoparticle treated under conditions of experimental group 3 according to Experimental Example 2 of the disclosure.



FIG. 11 shows the influence of the addition amount of CMC-Na on the free radical scavenging rate according to Experimental Example 3 of the disclosure.



FIG. 12 shows the influence of the addition amount of CMC-Na on the curcumin beverage according to Experimental Example 3 of the disclosure.



FIG. 13 shows the influence of the addition amount of xanthan gum on the free radical scavenging rate according to Experimental Example 4 of the disclosure.



FIG. 14 shows the influence of the addition amount of xanthan gum on the curcumin beverage according to Experimental Example 4 of the disclosure.



FIG. 15 shows the influence of the addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate on the free radical scavenging rate according to Experimental Example 5 of the disclosure.



FIG. 16 shows the influence of the addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate on the curcumin beverage according to Experimental Example 5 of the disclosure.



FIG. 17 shows the influence of the addition amount of freeze-dried curcumin powder on the free radical scavenging rate according to Experimental Example 6 of the disclosure.



FIG. 18 shows the influence of the addition amount of freeze-dried curcumin powder on the curcumin beverage according to Experimental Example 6 of the disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Materials and reagents used herein are shown in Table 1.









TABLE 1







Materials and reagents









Materials




and reagents
Grade
Manufacturer





Curcumin powder
Food grade
AAFUD Industry



(purity 37.98%)
(Zhuhai) Co., Ltd


Curcumin standard
Primary reference
Shanghai Yuan Mu



standard
Biotechnology Co., Ltd.



(purity 98%)



Zein
Food grade
Xinrong Food




Ingredients Mall


Gum arabic
Food grade
Henan Tanggu




Biotechnology Co., Ltd.


Zinc sulfate
Analytical grade
Tianjin Fuchen Chemical




Reagent Factory


Tribute citrus

Purchased in Shaoguan




(Guangdong, China)


Xylitol
Food grade
Jiangsu Yangsheng




Biotechnology Co., Ltd.


Propionic acid
Analytical grade
Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd.


CMC-Na
Food grade
Shanghai Shenguang food




chemicals Co., Ltd.


Starch sodium
Food grade
Yixing Biotechnology


octenyl succinate

Co., Ltd


Methylparaben
Analytical grade
Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd.


Xanthan gum
Food grade
Henan Enmiao




Food Co., Ltd.


Absolute ethyl
Analytical grade
Tianjin Baishi


alcohol

Chemical Co., Ltd.


Ascorbic acid
Analytical grade
Shanghai Yuanye




Biotechnology Co., Ltd.


DPPH•
Analytical grade
TCI chemical Co., Ltd.


Potassium persulfate
Analytical grade
Shanghai Trade Co., Ltd.


2,2′-Azinobis-(3-
Analytical grade
Beijing Solarbio


ethylbenzthiazoline-

Science & Technology


6-sulphonate)

Co., Ltd.


(ABTS+•)




Methanol
HPLC grade
Tianjin Damao Chemical




Reagent Factory


5% Acetic acid
Analytical grade
Jinan Yuanfeiweiye




Chemical Co., Ltd.


Absolute ethyl
Analytical grade
Xilong Scientific


alcohol

Co., Ltd.


Ultrapure water
Analytical grade
Jinan Wangsheng




Chemical Co., Ltd.


Nitric acid
Analytical grade
Shanghai Zhanyun




Chemical Co., Ltd.


Ebony Flies

Laboratory of




Molecular Biology and




Genetics, Sun Yat-sen




University









Instruments used herein are shown in Table 2.









TABLE 2







Instruments











Instruments
Manufacturer
Model







Digital-display
Changzhou Yuexin Instrument
HH-4



thermostatic
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.




water bath





Full wavelength
Shanghai Mapada
SHE-



microplate reader
Instruments Co., Ltd.
3000G



Microplate reader
Thermo Fisher Scientific Oy
1510



Electronic balance
Shanghai Zhuojing Electronic
BSM-




Technology Co., Ltd.
220.40



Digital-display
Changzhou Ronghua
JB-3



thermostatic
Instrument




magnetic stirrer
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.




Low-speed desk
Shanghai Anting Scientific
800C



centrifuge
Instrument Factory




Freeze dryer
Shanghai Yuming
FD-1E-50




Instrument Co., Ltd.




Inductively coupled
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
iCAP Q



plasma spectrometer

ICP-MS



Microwave digestion
CEM Corporation (US)
MARS6



system





Laser particle
Zhuhai Omec
LS-POP



size analyzer
Instruments CO., Ltd.
(9)



Rotary evaporator
Shanghai Yarong Bio-chemical
RE-52AA




Instrument Factory




Water circulating
Shanghai Jinfu Experimental
SZ-D (III)



vacuum pump
instruments Co., Ltd.




Experimental
Zhengzhou Yuxiang
CGJB60-



homogenizer
Machinery Equipment
70




Co., Ltd.




Steam sterilizer
Guangzhou Hongtu
DSX-18L




Instruments Co., Ltd




Intelligent light
Shaoguan Guangzhi
GZ-



incubator
Technology Equipment
250-GH




Co., Ltd.




HPLC
Shimadzu (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
SPD-16



Food processor
Shandong Joyoung Household
TYL-




Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.
350A










The data processing is performed with the help of GraphPad Prism 7.04, Origin 9, EZ OMNIC and Orthogonal experimental design.


Unless otherwise specified, the materials, reagents and instruments used herein are known in the field to which this application pertains, and are not intended to limit the disclosure. Other suitable reagents and instruments are also feasible.


The curcumin nanoparticle prepared herein and its application will be further illustrated with reference to the following embodiments.


Example 1

Provided herein was a curcumin nanoparticle including a core material and a wall material in a weight ratio of (5.5-7.5):100, where the core material was curcumin, and the wall material was composed of gum arabic and zein in a weight ratio of (1-5):5.


Compared to the prior art, the curcumin nanoparticle provided herein, with curcumin as the core material and a combination of gum arabic and zein as the wall material, has strong light stability and anti-oxidant property in solutions. In addition, the small size renders the curcumin nanoparticle highly water-soluble.


In order to optimize the prepared curcumin nanoparticle, the curcumin material and the mineral composition of curcumin were analyzed as follows.


Analysis of Curcumin Material


The maximum absorption wavelength of curcumin was determined as follows.


0.01 g of curcumin powder was transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask, and dissolved and diluted with 95% ethanol to 100 mL to produce a 0.1 mg/mL curcumin solution. 500 μL of the 0.1 mg/mL curcumin solution was transferred to another volumetric flask and diluted to 100 mL with 95% ethanol to produce a 0.5 μg/mL curcumin solution. Then the absorbance of the curcumin solution at different wavelengths was measured, and an absorption curve with wavelength as horizontal ordinate and absorbency as vertical ordinate was plotted to obtain the maximum ab sorption wavelength.


As shown in FIG. 1, the maximum absorption wavelength of curcumin was determined to be 425 nm.


A standard curve of curcumin concentration X versus absorbance Y was plotted as follows.


25 mg of curcumin standard was added to a 50 mL volumetric flask, and dissolved and diluted with 95% ethanol to produce a stock solution. The stock solution was diluted to a series of standard solutions respectively with a concentration of 0, 15 μg/mL, 30 μg/mL, 45 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL and 75 μg/mL, which were further measured at 425 nm for the absorbance. The standard curve was plotted based on the curcumin concentration and the corresponding absorbance, and a regression equation of the standard curve was obtained as Y=0.3168x+0.6349 (R2=0.9974) by linear fitting.


Analysis of Mineral Composition of Curcumin


The mineral composition of curcumin was analyzed by microwave digestion according to GB 5009.268-2016 “Determination of multiple elements in food”. 0.2824 g of solid curcumin was added to a microwave digestion tube, to which 8 mL of nitric acid was added. The tube was covered with a lid and placed for 1 hour or overnight. Then the lid was screwed tightly and the reaction mixture was subjected to digestion in accordance with the instructions of the microwave digester. After the digestion system was cooled, the lid was slowly opened to release the gas, and the interior lid was rinsed with some water. Then the digestion tube was placed on a temperature-controlled electric hot plate to remove the excessive acid, and the reaction mixture was diluted with ultra-pure water to 25 mL in a volumetric flask and mixed uniformly for use. The same number of blank tests was conducted at the same time.









TABLE 3







Mineral composition of curcumin









Element
Element content (mg/kg)
Percentage (%)












Fe
11.9382
1.19382


Zn
2.2892
0.02892









It can be seen from Table 3 that there was a relatively small amount of Zn2+ in the curcumin, which will affect the stability of curcumin to some extent.


Determination of optimal concentration of stabilizer (Zn2+) A curcumin stock solution was prepared as follows. 0.175 g of curcumin was dissolved with 280 mL of absolute ethanol and stirred thoroughly to prepare the curcumin stock solution.


A series of Zn2+ stock solutions were prepared as follows. 0.03 g, 0.06 g, 0.09 g, 0.12 g, 0.15 g and 0.18 g of zinc sulfate were dissolved with 100 mL of distilled water and stirred uniformly to prepare a series of zinc sulfate stock solutions with a concentration of 0.3 g/L, 0.6 g/L, 0.9 g/L, 1.2 g/L, 1.5 g/L and 1.8 g/L, respectively, which were stored for use.


The optimal concentration of Zn′ was determined as follows.


The curcumin stock solution was added to 7 vessels each for 40 mL, to which 10 mL of zinc sulfate stock solutions with a concentration of 0.0 g/L, 0.3 g/L, 0.6 g/L, 0.9 g/L, 1.2 g/L, 1.5 g/L and 1.8 g/L was added respectively, that was, the contents of zinc sulfate in the 7 vessels were 0.0 g/L, 0.06 g/L, 0.12 g/L, 0.18 g/L, 0.24 g/L, 0.3 g/L and 0.36 g/L, respectively. The 7 vessels were placed at room temperature and measured for the absorbance at 425 nm using a microplate reader every other 12 h, where each measurement was performed in triplicate.


As shown in FIG. 3, the curcumin solutions all underwent a fading within 48 h after the addition of different concentrations of zinc ions, while in 48-60 h, the zinc ions resulted in an increase in the absorbance of the curcumin solution. After 60 h, the system with a Zn2+ concentration of 0.3 g/L showed the smallest slope and relatively stable absorbance, and by contrast, though the sample with a Zn2+ concentration of 0.36 g/L had a relatively stable absorbance, it still exhibited a declining tendency. Therefore, the zinc ions at a concentration of 0.3 g/L can improve the stability of curcumin to the largest extent.


The curcumin nanoparticle of this example was prepared according to the above analysis on the curcumin solid and the mineral composition of curcumin, and the specific preparation process was described as follows.


(1) Preparation of curcumin stock solution


Zein was dissolved in 85% ethanol, magnetically stirred for 1 h and centrifuged to remove the insoluble impurities to obtain a zein solution. Then the zein solution was added with curcumin and stirred for 30 min to produce the curcumin stock solution.


(2) Preparation of gum arabic stock solution


Gum arabic was dissolved with a 0.3 g/L aqueous zinc sulfate solution at a 60° C. water bath under stirring to produce a gum arabic stock solution, where a volume ratio of water in the gum arabic stock solution to ethanol in the curcumin stock solution was (1.5-3.5):1.


(3) Anti-solvent precipitation


The curcumin stock solution was added in a trickle manner into the gum arabic stock solution, and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min to produce a curcumin nanoparticle dispersion.


(4) Rotary evaporation


The curcumin nanoparticle dispersion was concentrated by rotary evaporation to obtain a curcumin nanoparticle concentrate.


(5) Drying


The curcumin nanoparticle concentrate was subjected to freeze drying to obtain the curcumin nanoparticle.


The following experiments were conducted to investigate influences of the volume ratio of the water to ethanol, the weight ratio of gum arabic to zein and the weight ratio of curcumin to zein-gum arabic on the prepared curcumin nanoparticle.


Experimental Example 1 Single-Factor Experiment on Preparation of Curcumin Nanoparticle

Encapsulation efficiency of the curcumin nanoparticle was used as an index to evaluate the influences of the volume ratio of the water in the gum arabic stock solution to ethanol in the curcumin stock solution, the weight ratio of gum arabic to zein and the weight ratio of curcumin to zein-gum arabic on the prepared curcumin nanoparticle, determining suitable ranges of the above three ratios.


Volume Ratio of Water to Ethanol


The preparation parameters of the curcumin nanoparticle were listed as follows: zein: 1 g; curcumin: 0.02 g; gum Arabic: 1 g; 85% ethanol: 50 mL; 0.3 g/L zinc sulfate solution (calculated based on total volume); and a volume ratio of distilled water to ethanol: 1.5:1, 2:1, 2.5:1, 3:1 and 3.5:1, respectively. The optimal volume ratio of the water to ethanol was determined according to the encapsulation efficiency of the curcumin nanoparticle.


As shown in FIG. 4, when the volume ratio increased from 1.5:1 to 2.5:1, the encapsulation efficiency of the prepared curcumin nanoparticle was increased from 85.4% to 93.2%; and as the volume ratio increased from 2.5:1 to 3.5:1, the encapsulation efficiency of the prepared curcumin nanoparticle decreased from 93.2% to 84.6%. This phenomenon can be possibly explained by that an increase in the volume ratio of the water to ethanol will lead to the supersaturation of curcumin, so that the curcumin will undergo precipitation during the deposition, bringing a decreased encapsulation efficiency. In view of this, it can be concluded that the optimal volume ratio of the water to ethanol was 2.5:1, and the encapsulation efficiency was always maintained above 84% within the volume ratio range from 1.5:1 to 3.5:1.


Weight Ratio of Gum Arabic to Zein


The preparation parameters of the curcumin nanoparticle were listed as follows: zein: 1 g; curcumin: 0.02 g; distilled water: 75 mL; 85% ethanol: 50 mL; 0.3 g/L zinc sulfate solution (calculated based on total volume); and a weight ratio of gum arabic to zein: 2:10, 4:10, 6:10, 8:10 and 10:10, respectively. The optimal weight ratio of the gum arabic to zein was determined according to the encapsulation efficiency of the curcumin nanoparticle.


As shown in FIG. 5, as the weight ratio increased, the encapsulation efficiency of the prepared curcumin nanoparticle first increased and then decreased. The encapsulation efficiency reached its peak (87.1%) at a weight ratio of 6:10, which could probably due to the complete neutralization of the charges of gum arabic and zein. The following decrease in the encapsulation efficiency resulted from the charge imbalance. The optimal weight ratio of gum arabic to zein was determined to 6:10. Further, the encapsulation efficiency was always maintained above 84% within the weight ratio range from 2:10 to 10:10.


Weight Ratio of Curcumin to Gum Arabic-Zein


The preparation parameters of the curcumin nanoparticle were listed as follows: zein: 1 g; gum arabic: 1 g; distilled water: 75 mL; 85% ethanol: 50 mL; 0.3 g/L zinc sulfate solution (calculated based on total volume); and a weight ratio of curcumin to gum arabic-zein: 5.5:100, 6:100, 6.5:100, 7:100 and 7.5:100, respectively. The optimal weight ratio of the curcumin to gum arabic-zein was determined according to the encapsulation efficiency of the curcumin nanoparticle.


As shown in FIG. 6, when the weight ratio increased from 5.5:100 to 6.5:100, the encapsulation efficiency of the prepared curcumin nanoparticle was improved from 97.1% to 97.6%; and when the weight ratio increased from 6.5:100 to 7.5:100, the encapsulation efficiency of the prepared curcumin nanoparticle decreased. It is probable that at a weight ratio of 6.5:100, the load of wall material reached the maximum, and the subsequent increase in the weight ratio will lead to an increase in the amount of free curcumin, reducing the encapsulation efficiency. The optimal weight ratio of curcumin to gum arabic-zein was determined to 6.5:100. Further, the encapsulation efficiency was always maintained above 97% within the weight ratio range from 5.5:100 to 7.5:100.


Furthermore, an orthogonal experiment was designed to determine the optimal volume ratio of the water to ethanol, the optimal weight ratio of gum arabic to zein and the optimal weight ratio of curcumin to zein-gum Arabic.


Specifically, the above three factors (i.e., the volume ratio of the water and ethanol, the weight ratio of gum arabic to zein and the weight ratio of curcumin to zein-gum Arabic) were optimized using the following L9(34) orthogonal table (Table 4), where encapsulation efficiency, light stability (expressed by light stability score=(1−(At−A1)/At)) and particle size (expressed by particle size score=(1-particle size)) were used as indexes to perform multi-index comprehensive evaluation. Higher light stability score and particle size score indicated more desirable results, and the light stability score was directly associated with the retention rate.









TABLE 4







L9(34) orthogonal table of the


preparation of curcumin nanoparticle











Factor













A Volume
B Weight ratio of
C Weight ratio




ratio of the
ingredients of wall
of core material



Level
water to ethanol
material
to wall material







1
2:1
4:10
6:100



2
2.5:1  
6:10
6.5:100  



3
3:1
8:10
7:100










Measurement of Encapsulation Efficiency of Curcumin Nanoparticle


1 mL of the curcumin nanoparticle was dispersed in 4 mL of 95% ethanol in a beaker, and subjected to ultrasonic extraction for 15 min to obtain free curcumin. Then the extraction system was filtered with 0.22 μm organic filter. The extraction was repeated three times, and the extracts were combined and measured at 425 nm for the absorbance, where the blank control was 95% ethanol. Then the obtained absorbance was plugged into the standard curve of curcumin in 95% ethanol to calculate the amount of free curcumin. The encapsulation efficiency and loading amount were calculated according to the following equations:

Encapsulation efficiency/(%)=(addition amount of curcumin-amount of free curcumin)/addition amount of curcumin×100%; and
Loading amount/(mg/g)=(addition amount of curcumin×encapsulation efficiency×1000)/(a total weight of zein and gum arabic+addition amount of curcumin).


Measurement of Particle Size of Curcumin Nanoparticle


The prepared curcumin nanoparticle was diluted, placed in a sample pool and measured by a laser particle analyzer for the particle size.


Investigation on light stability of curcumin nanoparticle


The prepared curcumin nanoparticle was diluted 4 times, placed at room temperature and measured by the microplate reader for the absorbance every 24 h to observe the influence of encapsulation on the light sensitivity of curcumin, where the unencapsulated curcumin was used as blank control. Curves of retention rates (calculated by ln(At*/A1*)) of the zein-gum arabic-curcumin nano-system and the unencapsulated curcumin versus time were respectively plotted to observe the influence of encapsulation on the light sensitivity of curcumin.


In the equation, At represented the absorbance of sample at different time points at room temperature; and A1 represented the initial absorbance.


It can be observed from FIG. 7 that after 48 h, the retention rate of the curcumin nanoparticle (prepared under the optimal conditions) tended to be stable, and the retention rate of the encapsulated curcumin was larger than that of the unencapsulated curcumin. Therefore, the encapsulation significantly inhibited the photodegradation of curcumin, allowing for enhanced light stability.


Results of the orthogonal experiment were shown in Table 5.









TABLE 5







Results of the L9(34) orthogonal experiment










Factor











C












B
Weight
















A
Weight
ratio of







Volume
ratio of
core



ratio of
ingredients
material to

Light
Encapsulation
Particle


Test
the water
of wall
wall
Blank
stability
efficiency
size


number
to ethanol
material
material
column
score
(%)
score



















1
1
(2:1)
1(4:10)
1
(6:100)
1
0.32
95.179 ± 0.02
−0.717


2
1
(2:1)
2(6:10)
2
(6.5:100)
2
0.19
96.191 ± 0.05
−0.729


3
1
(2:1)
3(8:10)
3
(7:100)
3
0.27
96.730 ± 0.02
0.060


4
2
(2.5:1)
1(4:10)
2
(6.5:100)
3
0.34
94.298 ± 0.02
−0.015


5
2
(2.5:1)
2(6:10)
3
(7:100)
1
0.23
95.426 ± 0.03
0.354


6
2
(2.5:1)
3(8:10)
1
(6:100)
2
0.33
96.156 ± 0.04
0.105


7
3
(3:1)
1(4:10)
3
(7:100)
2
0.49
93.708 ± 0.02
0.175


8
3
(3:1)
2(6:10)
1
(6:100)
3
0.40
94.735 ± 0.06
0.050


9
3
(3:1)
3(8:10)
2
(6.5:100)
1
0.36
95.844 ± 0.02
0.004














k1
0.260
0.383
0.350
0.303





k2
0.300
0.273
0.297
0.337


k3
0.417
0.350
0.330
0.337


Range
0.157
0.110
0.053
0.034















Primary and secondary
A > B > C









factor


Optimal combination
A3B1C1














k′1
96.033
94.395
95.357
95.483





k′2
95.293
95.451
95.444
95.352


k′3
94.762
96.243
95.288
95.254


R'
1.271
1.848
0.156
0.229















Primary and secondary
B > A > C









factor


Optimal combination
B3A1C2














k″1
−0.462
−0.231
−0.187
−0.120





k″2
0.103
−0.108
−0.292
−0.150


k″3
0.076
0.056
0.196
−0.013


R″
0.565
0.287
0.488
0.137















Primary and secondary
A > C > B









factor


Optimal combination
A2C3B3









The results of variance analysis of the indexes were presented in Tables 6-9.









TABLE 6







Results of variance analysis based on encapsulation efficiency

















Degree








Sum of
of
Divided
F

Critical value of


Index
Factor
squares
freedom
differences
value
Significance
F-test

















Encapsulation
A
2.445
2
1.222
30.949
*
F0.05(2, 2) = 19.00


efficiency
B
5.159
2
2.580
65.304
*
F0.10(2, 2) = 9.00



C
0.040
2
0.020
0.468



e
0.079
2
0.039
















TABLE 7







Results of variance analysis based on particle size

















Degree








Sum of
of
Divided
F

Critical value of


Index
Factor
squares
freedom
differences
value
Significance
F-test

















Particle
A
0.610
2
0.305
19.677
*
F0.05(2, 2) = 19.00


size score
B
0.124
2
0.062
4.000

F0.10(2, 2 ) = 9.00



C
0.396
2
0.198
12.774



e
0.031
2
0.0155
















TABLE 8







Results of variance analysis on degradation rate of absorbance

















Degree








Sum of
of
Divided
F

Critical value of


Index
Factor
squares
freedom
differences
value
Significance
F-test

















Light
A
0.040
2
0.020
20.000
*
F0.05(2, 2) = 19.00


stability
B
0.018
2
0.009
9.000

F0.10(2, 2) = 9.00


score
C
0.004
2
0.002
2.000



e
0.002
2
0.001





Note:


* represents significance p < 0.05.













TABLE 9







Optimal combination for each index











Light
Encapsulation
Particle


Index
stability score
efficiency
size score





Significance
A (statistically
A and B (statistically
A (statistically



significant)
significant)
significant)


R value
A>B>C
B>A>C
A>C>B


Optimal
A3B1C1
B3A1C2
A2C3B3


combination









It can be seen from Tables 5-9 that the factor A could significantly influence the light stability, encapsulation efficiency and particle size. According to R value, A3 was optimal when the light stability was used as the index; A1 was optimal when the encapsulation efficiency was used as the index; and A2 was optimal when the particle size was used as the index. Factor B had a significant influence on the encapsulation efficiency, and B3 was selected in view of the R value. Factor C had no significant influence on all of the three indexes, but considering that the particle size of the nanoparticle was required to be relatively small and the R value, C3 was preferred. Further, the optimal level for the preparation of curcumin particle was determined as A3B3C3 by comprehensive balancing method, that was, the volume ratio of the water to ethanol was 3:1; the weight ratio of gum arabic to zein was 8:10; and the weight ratio of curcumin to zein-gum arabic was 7:100. It was further confirmed by experiments that the curcumin nanoparticle prepared under optimal conditions had an encapsulation efficiency of 95.884%, a loading amount of 62 mg/g, a particle size of 0.940 μm, and an absorbance descending slope of 0.73.


Example 2

Provided herein was a curcumin beverage, consisting of:


15% by weight of Tribute Citrus concentrate;


0.05%-0.25% by weight of xanthan gum;


0.2%-1% by weight of the curcumin particle;


0.2%-1% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate;


0.05%-0.25% by weight of CMC-Na;


0.1% by weight of citric acid;


10% by weight of xylitol; and


water.


Specifically, the addition of 0.2%-1% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle made the curcumin beverage have activities of improving the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reducing the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), showing anti-aging and antioxidation effects.


Preparation of the Curcumin Beverage


(1) Preparation of Tribute Citrus concentrate


Tribute Citrus fruits were cored and peeled, and then squeezed with a juicer to produce a Tribute Citrus juice, which was filtered twice with a double gauze to collect a filtrate. The filtrate was concentrated by rotary evaporation to a solid content of 70% to produce the Tribute Citrus concentrate.


(2) Mixing


The curcumin nanoparticle, starch sodium octenyl succinate and the Tribute Citrus concentrate were mixed by stirring to obtain a first mixture.


(3) Homogenization


The mixture obtained in step (2) was homogenized by a high-pressure homogenizer to obtain a first homogenized product.


(4) Compounding


The first homogenized product obtained in step (3) was compounded with the CMC-Na, xanthan gum, citric acid and xylitol to produce a second mixture.


(5) Secondary homogenization


The second mixture obtained in step (2) was homogenized by the high-pressure homogenizer to obtain a second homogenized product.


(6) Degassing


The second homogenized product was heated in a water bath at 80° C. for 15 min, and then degassed to obtain a degassed product.


(7) Bottling and sterilization


The degassed product was bottled and sterilized to produce the curcumin beverage.


To obtain the optimal curcumin beverage, the preparation of the curcumin beverage was optimized by experimental example 2.


Experimental Example 2 Optimization of Preparation of Curcumin Beverage Determination of Homogenization Pressure

The homogenization was performed twice. With regard to the experimental group 1, the two homogenization steps were performed sequentially at 25 MPa and 5 MPa; while for the experimental group 2, the two homogenization steps were performed sequentially at 5 MPa and 25 MPa. The non-homogenized curcumin beverage was used as control (experimental group 3). The effect of homogenization on the particle size was presented in Table 10.









TABLE 10







Effect of homogenization on particle size













Pressure of primary
Pressure of secondary
D50



Group
homogenization
homogenization
(μm)
















1
25
5
16.795



2
5
25
100.656



3
0
0
417.56










From the perspective of particle size, the experimental group 1 was superior to the experimental group 2, and the experimental group 2 was better than the group 1. Referring to FIGS. 8-10, it can be seen that when the primary and secondary homogenization pressures were 25 MPa and 5 MPa, respectively, the large particles were crushed more completely into small particles, facilitating improving the storage stability of drinks; and by comparison, when the primary and secondary homogenization pressures were 5 MPa and 25 MPa, the large particles can be crushed, but the effect was inferior to that of the experimental group 1. The D50 of the experimental groups 1-2 was superior to that of the experimental group 3 which did not undergo homogenization. Therefore, the homogenization conditions of the experimental group 1 were employed.


Determination of Sterilization Conditions


The curcumin beverage was a low-acid food (pH 6), so it can be sterilized at high temperature and high pressure (121° C. for 10 min). Moreover, it can also be acidified with citric acid to pH 4.6 and then pasteurized at 80° C. for 20 min; or filtered with a 0.22 μm organic filter for cold sterilization. The unsterilized beverage was used as control. The scavenging capacity toward DPPH free radical was used as an index to evaluate the sterilization effect, where the ascorbic acid (Vc) was used as positive control. The results were shown in Table 11.


Analysis of Antioxidant Property


The beverage samples were prepared as follows. Freeze-dried curcumin nanoparticle powder and starch sodium octenyl succinate were used as raw materials, and xanthan gum and CMC-Na were used as stabilizers. A 100 mg/mL curcumin beverage was prepared according to the above process, and then diluted with distilled water to 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL.


2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg and 10 mg of Vc were diluted with distilled water to 100 mL, respectively, that was, the final concentrations of the Vc were 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively.









TABLE 11







Conditions for sterilization













DPPH•
DPPH•





scavenging
scavenging
Total




activity of
activity
colony



Conditions for
sample IC50
of VC IC50
count


Sample
sterilization
(μg · mL−1)
(μg · mL−1)
(CFU/mL)














1
121° C./10 min
55.71 ± 3.89
15.81 ± 5.04
6


2
 80° C./20 min
193.3 ± 3.7 
22.74 ± 8.59
5


3
0.22 μm
67.19 ± 4.94
13.63 ± 4.52
38



organic filter





4
Unsterilized
41.95 ± 4.79
11.19 ± 5.32
198









It can be seen from Table 11 that in terms of IC50 value, the four sample groups were sequentially 2, 3, 4 and 1 from highest to lowest, and the four Vc positive control groups were sequentially 2, 1, 3 and 4 from highest to lowest. A lower IC50 value indicated higher DPPH⋅ scavenging rate, indicating a better antioxidant property. Therefore, the sample 1 has the highest antioxidant property. Compared to the unsterilized sample, the three sterilized samples all exhibited higher IC50. With regard to the sample 2, since it was acidified to pH 4.6 and the acid group anion had an inhibitory effect on the superoxide anion, it had the highest IC50 value, which indicated that the sample 2 had the lowest scavenging activity toward DPPH⋅ and the poorest antioxidant property. The total colony counts of the samples 1-3 met the related standards mentioned in GB 7101-2015 “National Food Safety Standards (drinks)”, while the total colony count of the unsterilized sample did not meet the national standards. In conclusion, the sterilization condition of 121° C./10 min was preferred.


Example 3

Provided herein was a curcumin beverage, consisting of:


15% by weight of Tribute Citrus concentrate;


0.15% by weight of xanthan gum;


0.8% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle;


0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate;


0.15% by weight of CMC-Na;


0.1% by weight of citric acid;


10% by weight of xylitol; and


water.


Specifically, the addition of 0.8% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle made the curcumin beverage have activities of improving the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and reducing the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), showing anti-aging and antioxidation effects.


The curcumin beverage was made according to the above process.


Experimental examples 3-6 were conducted to investigate the influence of the additive amount of CMC-Na, xanthan gum, nanocurcumin and starch sodium octenyl succinate on the quality of the curcumin beverage.


Criteria for evaluating the quality of the curcumin beverage were established.


Criteria for evaluating the quality of the curcumin beverage


Criteria of Sensory Evaluation


The sensory indexes of the curcumin beverage were evaluated by 8 members.









TABLE 12







Criteria of sensory score











Item
Index
Score







Color and luster
Even color, orange
11-20



(Full mark 20)





Odor
Relatively dark color
 0-10



(Full mark 30)
Curcumin odor and orange odor, no
15-30




peculiar smell




Taste
Light curcumin odor, no peculiar odor
 0-15



(Full mark 30)
Pure taste, moderate sour and sweet
20-30




taste, no peculiar taste




State of tissue
Relatively pure taste, slightly sour or
10-20



(Full mark 20)
sweet





Unpalatable taste, sour or sweet
 0-10




Even turbidity in juice, stable
10-20




Precipitates in juice, uneven
 0-10











Stability of Absorbance


A certain amount of the curcumin nanoparticle was diluted 20 times with water, mixed uniformly and centrifuged at 4,000 r/min for 15 min. The absorbance (A0) of the sample before the centrifugation and the absorbance (A) of the sample after the centrifugation were measured at the maximum absorption wavelength, and the stability of absorbance was represented by A/A0.


Precipitation Rate after Centrifugation


The weight of the centrifuge tube and the total weight of the sample and the centrifuge tube were measured, and then the sample was centrifuged at 4,000 r/min for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded and the total weight of the centrifuge tube and the precipitate was accurately measured.


The precipitation rate was calculated as follows: precipitation rate=precipitate weight/sample weightx 100%.


Measurement of DPPH⋅ scavenging activity


(1) Sample preparation


The beverage samples were prepared as follows. Freeze-dried curcumin nanoparticle powder and starch sodium octenyl succinate were used as raw materials, and xanthan gum and CMC-Na were used as stabilizers. A 100 mg/mL curcumin beverage was prepared according to the above process, and then diluted with distilled water to 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL.


2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg and 10 mg of Vc were diluted with distilled water to 100 mL, respectively, that was, the final concentrations of the Vc were 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL, respectively.


(2) Measurement of DPPH⋅ scavenging activity 100 μL of a solution of DPPH in ethanol (0.2 mmol/L) was added to a 96-well plate, to which 100 μL of different concentrations of the curcumin beverages was added and mixed uniformly. The reaction mixture was reacted in dark for 30 min, and then measured at 517 nm for the absorbance (A1), where a well containing the sample and 100 μL of absolute ethanol was used as control; a well containing 100 μL of distilled water and 100 μL of the DPPH solution was used as blank group; and Vc was used as positive control.


The scavenging rate was calculated as follows: scavenging rate %=[1−(A1−A2)/A0]×100%,


where:


A0: absorbance of the mixture of 100 μL of distilled water and 100 μL of the solution of DPPH in ethanol;


A1: absorbance of the mixture of 100 μL of sample and 100 μL of the solution of DPPH in ethanol;


A2: absorbance of the mixture of 100 μL of sample and 100 μL of absolute ethanol.


Measurement of ABTS+⋅ scavenging activity


(1) Sample preparation


The beverage samples were prepared as follows. Freeze-dried curcumin nanoparticle powder and starch sodium octenyl succinate were used as raw materials, and xanthan gum and CMC-Na were used as stabilizers. A 100 mg/mL curcumin beverage was prepared according to the above process, and then diluted with distilled water to 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 m/mL.


2 mg, 4 mg, 6 mg, 8 mg and 10 mg of Vc were diluted with distilled water to 100 mL, respectively, that was, the final concentrations of the Vc were 20 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 60 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 100 m/mL, respectively.


(2) Measurement of ABTS+⋅ scavenging activity


5 mL of a K2S2O8 solution (2.6 mmol/L) and 10 mL of an ABTS+⋅ solution (7.4 mmol/L) were mixed uniformly and reacted in dark for 12 h. The ABTS+⋅ solution was diluted with phosphate buffer solution (pH=6.6) to an absorbance of 0.70±0.02 to produce a working solution. 40 μL of different concentrations of curcumin beverages was added in a 96-well plate, to which 160 μL of the ABTS+⋅ working solution was added. The reaction mixture was mixed uniformly, reacted in dark for 6 min and measured at 734 nm for the absorbance A1, where a well containing the sample and 160 μL of absolute ethanol was used as control; a well containing 40 μL of distilled water and 160 μL of the ABTS+⋅ solution was used as blank group; and Vc was used as positive control.


The scavenging rate was calculated as follows: scavenging rate %=[1−(A1−A2)/A0]×100%,


where:


A0: absorbance of the mixture of 40 μL of distilled water and 160 μL of the ABTS+⋅ solution;


A1: absorbance of the mixture of 40 μL of the sample and 160 μL of the ABTS+⋅ solution;


A2: absorbance of the mixture of 40 μL of the sample liquid and 160 μL of absolute ethyl alcohol.


Comprehensive Scoring


The formula of the curcumin beverage was determined by comprehensive scoring. The sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate, capacity of DPPH⋅ scavenging activity, and ABTS+⋅ scavenging activity were used as indexes for assessment, where the total score=sensory score×its weight+absorbance stability score×its weight+score of precipitation rate×its weight+score of DPPH⋅ scavenging rate×its weight+score of ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate×its weight.


The level distribution, ranking score, and weight distribution were shown respectively in Table 13, Table 14, and Table 15.









TABLE 13







Level distribution









Index












Coefficient






of
Precipitation
Rate of
Rate of



absorbency
rate after
DPPH•radical
ABTS+•radical


Level
stability
centrifugation
clearance (%)
clearance (%)





1
≥0.4
≤0.4
≥80.00
≥80.00


2
0.3~0.4
0.4~0.6
80.00~60.00
80.00~60.00


3
0.3~0.2
0.6~0.8
60.00:40.00
60.00~40.00


4
≤0.3
≥0.8
≤40.00
≤40.00
















TABLE 14







Ranking score











Rank
1
2
3
4





Score
100
80
50
30
















TABLE 15







Weight distribution










Index
Weight







Sensory score
0.2



Stability of absorbance
0.2



Precipitation rate after centrifugation
0.2



DPPH• scavenging rate
0.2



ABTS+• scavenging rate
0.2










Experimental Example 3 Influence of the Addition Amount of CMC-Na on the Quality of the Curcumin Beverage

A series of curcumin beverages containing 0.4% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle, 0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate, 0.1% by weight of xanthan gum, 10% by weight of xylitol, 0.1% by weight of citric acid and CMC-Na were prepared according the above process, where the addition amount of CMC-Na in the beverages was 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2% and 0.25%, respectively. The sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate after centrifugation, DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate were used as evaluation indexes to determine the optimal addition amount of CMC-Na. The results were shown in Table 16.









TABLE 16







Influence of the additive amount of CMC-Na on the quality of the curcumin beverage








Additive














amount of

Coefficient of
Precipitation
DPPH · scavenging
ABTS+ · scavenging



CMC-Na
Sensory
absorbance
rate after
rate (%)
rate (%)
Comprehensive















(%)
score
stability
centrifugation
Sample
Vc
Sample
Vc
score


















0.05
80
0.256 ± 0.005
0.379 ± 0.010
63.23
92.51
44.30
90.38
68.0


0.10
90
0.456 ± 0.011
0.357 ± 0.010
63.11
92.51
41.29
90.38
84.0


0.15
78
0.411 ± 0.016
0.384 ± 0.010
63.35
92.51
41.96
90.38
81.6


0.20
75
0.391 ± 0.030
0.393 ± 0.010
63.87
92.51
42.88
90.38
77.0


0.25
75
0.389 ± 0.004
0.396 ± 0.020
63.26
92.51
42.70
90.38
77.0









It can be seen from Table 16 that the sensory score increased first and then decreased along with the increase of the additive amount of CMC-Na, and the sample with 0.1% by weight of CMC-Na had the highest sensory score. It was because with 0.1% CMC-Na, the drink did not experience precipitation or layering, and had the best taste. With the increase of the addition amount of CMC-Na, the taste of drink gradually became bad. When 0.1% CMC-Na was added, the system was in a stable state, exhibiting the highest coefficient of absorbance stability and lowest precipitation rate after centrifugation. With the increase of CMC-Na, the stable state was broken, leading to a decline in the coefficient of absorbance stability and an increase in the precipitation rate. It can be observed from FIG. 11 that the addition amount of CMC-Na had little influence on the DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and the ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate. It can be seen from Table 16, FIG. 11 and FIG. 12 that the drink with 0.1% CMC-Na had the highest comprehensive score, indicating that the optimal addition amount of CMC-Na was 0.1%.


Experimental Example 4 Influence of the Additive Amount of Xanthan Gum on the Quality of the Curcumin Beverage

A series of curcumin beverages containing 0.4% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle, 0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate, 0.1% by weight of CMC-Na, 10% by weight of xylitol, 0.1% by weight of citric acid and xanthan gum were prepared according the above process, where the addition amount of xanthan gum in the beverages was 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.15%, 0.2% and 0.25%, respectively. The sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate after centrifugation, DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate were used as evaluation indexes to determine the optimal addition amount of xanthan gum. The results were shown in Table 17.









TABLE 17







Influence of the additive amount of xanthan gum on the quality of the curcumin beverage








Additive














amount of

Coefficient of
Precipitation
DPPH · scavenging
ABTS+ · scavenging



xanthan
Sensory
absorbance
rate after
rate (%)
rate (%)
Comprehensive















gum/%
score
stability
centrifugation
Sample
Vc
Sample
Vc
score


















0.05
80
0.351 ± 0.010
0.410 ± 0.010
45.65
92.51
37.17
90.38
64.6


0.10
83
0.385 ± 0.010
0.360 ± 0.010
45.06
92.51
37.76
90.38
68.6


0.15
90
0.555 ± 0.010
0.331 ± 0.010
45.27
92.51
36.70
90.38
74.0


0.20
83
0.542 ± 0.020
0.348 ± 0.010
45.74
92.51
37.54
90.38
72.6


0.25
80
0.509 ± 0.010
0.371 ± 0.010
45.27
92.51
37.85
90.38
72.0









It can be seen from Table 17 that the sensory score increased first and then decreased along with the increase of the additive amount of xanthan gum, and the sample with 0.15% by weight of xanthan gum had the highest sensory score. It was because with 0.15% xanthan gum, the drink did not experience precipitation or layering, and had the best taste. With the increase of the addition amount of xanthan gum, the drink became more viscous, affecting the taste. When 0.15% xanthan gum was added, the system was in a stable state, exhibiting the highest coefficient of absorbance stability and lowest precipitation rate after centrifugation. With the increase of xanthan gum, the stable state was broken, leading to a decline in the coefficient of absorbance stability and an increase in the precipitation rate. It can be observed from FIG. 13 that the addition amount of xanthan gum had little influence on the DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and the ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate. It can be seen from Table 17, FIG. 13 and FIG. 14 that the drink with 0.15% xanthan gum had the highest comprehensive score, indicating that the optimal addition amount of xanthan gum was 0.15%.


Experimental Example 5 Influence of the Additive Amount of Starch Sodium Octenyl Succinate on the Quality of the Curcumin Beverage

A series of curcumin beverages containing 0.4% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle, 0.1% by weight of xanthan gum, 0.1% by weight of CMC-Na, 10% by weight of xylitol, 0.1% by weight of citric acid and starch sodium octenyl succinate were prepared according the above process, where the addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate in the beverages was 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% and 1.0%, respectively. The sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate after centrifugation, DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate were used as evaluation indexes to determine the optimal addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate. The results were shown in Table 18.









TABLE 18







Influence of the additive amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate on the quality of the curcumin beverage








Addictive



amount of


starch













sodium

Coefficient of
Precipitation
DPPH · scavenging
ABTS+ · scavenging



octenyl
Sensory
absorbance
rate after
rate (%)
rate (%)
Comprehensive















succinate/%
score
stability
centrifugation
Sample
Vc
Sample
Vc
score


















0.2
80
0.585 ± 0.01
0.340 ± 0.01
35.02
92.51
45.60
90.38
72


0.4
90
0.503 ± 0.01
0.342 ± 0.01
35.19
92.51
45.13
90.38
74


0.6
85
0.469 ± 0.01
0.363 ± 0.01
36.51
92.51
45.07
90.38
73


0.8
80
0.415 ± 0.01
0.404 ± 0.01
37.82
92.51
45.10
90.38
68


1.0
75
0.368 ± 0.01
0.421 ± 0.01
39.09
92.51
45.27
90.38
63









It can be seen from Table 18 that the sensory score increased first and then decreased along with the increase of the additive amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate, and the sample with 0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate had the highest sensory score. It was because with 0.4% starch sodium octenyl succinate, the drink exhibited the highest level of odors of starch sodium octenyl succinate and curcumin. With the increase of the addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate, the odor of starch sodium octenyl succinate was too strong, masking the odor of curcumin and deteriorating the taste. With the increase of starch sodium octenyl succinate, the coefficient of absorbance stability experienced a decline and the precipitation rate experienced an increase. It can be observed from FIG. 15 that the addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate had little influence on the ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate, but with the increase of the starch sodium octenyl succinate, the DPPH⋅ scavenging rate was slightly improved. It can be seen from Table 18, FIG. 15 and FIG. 16 that the drink with 0.4% starch sodium octenyl succinate had the highest comprehensive score, indicating that the optimal addition amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate was 0.4%.


Experimental Example 6 Influence of the Additive Amount of Curcumin Nanoparticle on the Quality of the Curcumin Beverage

A series of curcumin beverages containing 0.4% by weight of the starch sodium octenyl succinate, 0.1% by weight of xanthan gum, 0.1% by weight of CMC-Na, 10% by weight of xylitol, 0.1% by weight of citric acid and starch sodium octenyl succinate were prepared according the above process, where the addition amount of the curcumin nanoparticle in the beverages was 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% and 1.0%, respectively. The sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate after centrifugation, DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate were used as evaluation indexes to determine the optimal addition amount of curcumin nanoparticle. The results were shown in Table 19.









TABLE 19







Influence of the additive amount of curcumin nanoparticle on the quality of the curcumin beverage













Freeze-dried



Rate of
Rate of



curcumin

Coefficient of
Precipitation
DPPH · radical
ABTS+ · radical


nanoparticle
Sensory
absorbency
rate after
clearance (%)
clearance (%)
Comprehensive














powder
score
stability
centrifugation
Sample
Vc
Sample Vc
score


















0.2
80
0.505 ± 0.01
0.393 ± 0.01
53.43
91.72
40.46
88.12
76.0


0.4
84
0.447 ± 0.01
0.429 ± 0.01
63.18
92.51
43.74
90.38
78.8


0.6
90
0.398 ± 0.01
0.446 ± 0.01
80.63
93.15
50.04
92.44
85.0


0.8
95
0.261 ± 0.01
0.486 ± 0.02
80.93
93.62
60.15
93.69
87.0


1.0
85
0.225 ± 0.01
0.547 ± 0.02
81.04
93.67
61.11
94.53
79.0









It can be seen from Table 19 that the sensory score increased first and then decreased along with the increase of the additive amount of the curcumin nanoparticle, and the sample with 0.8% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle had the highest sensory score. It was because with 0.8% curcumin nanoparticle, the drink showed strong curcumin odor, and with the increase of the addition amount of the curcumin nanoparticle, the odor of the curcumin nanoparticle was too strong, affecting the sensory evaluation. With the increase of the curcumin nanoparticle, the coefficient of absorbance stability experienced a decline and the precipitation rate experienced an increase. It can be observed from FIG. 17 that the addition amount of the curcumin nanoparticle was positively associate with the ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate and the DPPH⋅ scavenging rate. It can be seen from Table 19, FIG. 17 and FIG. 18 that the drink with 0.8% curcumin nanoparticle had the highest comprehensive score, indicating that the optimal addition amount of the curcumin nanoparticle was 0.8%.


To determine the optimal combination of the additive amounts of CMC-Na, xanthan gum, the curcumin nanoparticle and starch sodium octenyl succinate, an orthogonal experiment was performed as follows.


Orthogonal Experiment


The formula of the curcumin beverage was optimized by L9(34) orthogonal experiment in which addition amounts of CMC-Na (A), xanthan gum (B), nanocurcumin (C) and starch sodium octenyl succinate (D) were used as experimental factors, and sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate after centrifugation, DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate were used as evaluation indexes. The orthogonal experiment was designed as shown in Tables 20-21.









TABLE 20







L9(34) orthogonal table











Factor
















C
D




A
B
Additive
Addictive




Additive
Additive
amount of
amount of




amount
amount of
freeze-dried
starch




of
xanthan
curcumin
sodium




CMC-Na
gum
powder
octenyl



Level
(%)
(%)
(%)
succinate (%)







1
0.05
0.10
0.2
0.6



2
0.10
0.15
0.4
0.8



3
0.15
0.20
0.6
1.0

















TABLE 21







Value of evaluation indices of experimental groups















Coefficient of
Precipitation
DPPH · scavenging
ABTS+ · scavenging



Test
Sensory
absorbance
rate after
rate (%)
rate (%)
Comprehensive















number
score
stability
centrifugation
Sample
Vc
Sample
Vc
score


















1
80
0.493 ± 0.2
0.435 ± 0.2
79.26
93.44
79.80
92.88
84.0


2
88
0.470 ± 0.1
0.374 ± 0.2
84.41
94.65
82.41
95.10
97.6


3
82
0.479 ± 0.2
0.444 ± 0.2
78.89
95.72
78.70
96.13
80.4


4
75
0.480 ± 0.2
0.370 ± 0.1
79.14
95.72
77.17
96.13
87.0


5
75
0.382 ± 0.2
0.371 ± 0.3
75.44
93.44
79.13
92.88
83.0


6
79
0.573 ± 0.2
0.363 ± 0.3
78.05
94.65
77.33
95.10
87.8


7
83
0.328 ± 0.3
0.361 ± 0.1
74.10
94.65
80.26
95.10
88.6


8
82
0.524 ± 0.1
0.403 ± 0.1
75.50
95.72
77.06
96.13
84.4


9
72
0.502 ± 0.1
0.371 ± 0.1
77.80
93.44
78.70
92.88
86.4









Results and Analysis









TABLE 22







Results of L9(34) orthogonal experiment
















D






C
Additive





B
Additive
amount of





Additive
amount of
the freeze-




A
amount
starch
dried
Com-



Additive
of
sodium
curcumin
pre-



amount of
xanthan
octenyl
nano-
hensive


Test
CMC-
gum
succinate
particle
score


number
Na (%)
(%)
(%)
powder
(%)





1
1(0.05)
1(0.10)
1(0.2)
1(0.6)
84.0


2
1(0.05)
2(0.15)
2(0.4)
2(0.8)
97.6


3
1(0.05)
3(0.20)
3(0.6)
3(1.0)
80.4


4
2(0.10)
1(0.10)
2(0.4)
3(1.0)
87.0


5
2(0.10)
2(0.15)
3(0.6)
1(0.6)
83.0


6
2(0.10)
3(0.20)
1(0.2)
2(0.8)
87.8


7
3(0.15)
1(0.10)
3(0.6)
2(0.8)
88.6


8
3(0.15)
2(0.15)
1(0.2)
3(1.0)
84.4


9
3(0.15)
3(0.20)
2(0.4)
1(0.6)
86.4


K1
87.333
86.533
85.400
84.467



K2
95.933
88.333
90.333
91.333



K3
96.467
84.867
84.000
83.933



R
 1.400
 3.466
 6.333
 7.400



Optimal
A3B2C2D2






combination







Significance
D>C>B>A






of factors









It can be seen from the R values in Table 22 that in terms of the influence on the quality of the curcumin beverage, the four factors were sequentially D, C, B and A from the largest to lowest, that was, the addition amount of the freeze-dried curcumin nanoparticle powder was the primary influencing factor, followed by the amount of starch sodium octenyl succinate, the amount of xanthan gum and the amount of CMC-Na. It can be seen from K values that the optimal combination was A3B2C2D2, that was, the additive amounts of CMC-Na, xanthan gum, starch sodium octenyl succinate and curcumin nanoparticle were 0.15%, 0.15%, 0.4% and 0.8%, respectively.


The variance analysis of results of orthogonal experiment was shown in Table 23.









TABLE 23







Variance analysis of orthogonal experiment














Degree

F
Sig-




of
F-
critical-
nifi-


Factor
DEVSQ
freedom
ratio
value
cance















CMC-Na
2.996
2
1.000
19.000



Xanthan gum
18.036
2
6.020
19.000



Starch sodium
66.409
2
22.166
19.000
*


octenyl succinate







Freeze-dried
102.196
2
34.111
19.000
*


curcumin







nanoparticle-







powder







Error
3.00
2









It can be observed from Table 23 that the curcumin nanoparticle and starch sodium octenyl succinate can significantly influence the quality of the curcumin beverage, and the influence of the former was more significant than the latter. CMC-Na and xanthan gum were insignificant factors.


The following verification experiment was conducted to verify the reliability of the orthogonal experiment.


The optimal orthogonal group was A3B2C2D2. The verification experiment was repeated three times, and the results were shown in Table 24, from which it can be found that the comprehensive score of the curcumin drink was 98.64, verifying the reliability of the orthogonal experiment. Therefore, A3B2C2D2 was considered to be the optimal combination.









TABLE 24







Verification experiment










Precipitation
















Coefficient of
rate after
DPPH · scavenging
ABTS+ · scavenging




Sensory
absorbance
centrifugation
rate (%)
rate (%)
Comprehensive















Number
score
stability
(%)
Sample
Vc
Sample
Vc
score





1
93.00
0.525
0.385
83.33
94.59
85.11
95.34
98.60


2
93.50
0.513
0.375
82.49
94.59
85.89
95.34
98.60


3
93.50
0.518
0.377
83.14
95.59
84.99
95.34
98.70


Mean
93.33 ± 0.24
0.518 ± 0.005
0.378 ± 0.004
82.86 ± 0.36
94.5 ± 0.00
85.33 ± 0.40
95.34 ± 0.00
98.64 ± 0.05









In conclusion, the optimal formula of the curcumin beverage was listed as follows: 0.15% by weight of xanthan gum, 0.15% by weight of CMC-Na, 0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate, 0.8% by weight of the freeze-dried curcumin nanoparticle powder, 0.1% by weight of citric acid and 10% by weight of xylitol. In this case, the product had the highest comprehensive score 98.64±0.05, where the sensory score was 93.33±0.24; the coefficient of absorbance stability was 0.518±0.005; and the precipitation rate after centrifugation was 37.8%±0.4%. Moreover, the curcumin beverage had a DPPH⋅ scavenging rate of 82.86% and an ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate of 85.33%, exhibiting certain antioxidant activity. The curcumin concentration of the drink was 4 mg/mL, and the drink was orange, and had moderate sour and sweet taste and a typical smell of curcumin.


Comparative Example 1

In this comparative example, several control groups, respectively Zn2+-bound curcumin, curcumin nanoparticle and pure curcumin, were established and compared with the curcumin beverage made under the optimal combination A3B2C2D2 in terms of sensory score, absorbance stability, precipitation rate after centrifugation, DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate. The change of indexes of curcumin after prepared into the beverage was investigated, and the results were shown in Table 25.









TABLE 25







Comparative experiment




















Precipitation






Curcumin


Coefficient of
rate after
DPPH ·
ABTS+ ·



concentration

Sensory
absorbanee
centrifugation
scavenging rate
scavenging rate
Comprehensive


Sample
mg/mL
pH
score
stability
(%)
(%)
(%)
score


















Pure
6.0
7
75.00
0.286 ± 0.180
0.550 ± 0.100
90.13
88.53
81.00


curcumin


Zn2+-bound
5.8
7
75.00
0.296 ± 0.200
0.523 ± 0.100
90.55
88.17
81.00


curcumin


Curcumin
4.8
7
75.00
0.342 ± 0.100
0.499 ± 0.100
88.77
86.52
87.40


nanopartide


Curcumin
4.0
6
93.33
0.518 ± 0.120
0.378 ± 0.100
82.86
85.33
98.64


beverage









It can be seen from Table 25 that the DPPH⋅ scavenging rate and the ABTS+⋅ scavenging rate successively decreased, while the stability increased successively in the sequence of pure curcumin solution, Zn2+-bound curcumin solution, curcumin nano-emulsion and the curcumin drink. In addition, the curcumin was prone to precipitation in the pure curcumin solution, Zn2+-bound curcumin solution and the curcumin nano-emulsion due to its poor water solubility is insoluble in water, which will affect the appearance. Meanwhile, the precipitated curcumin had a strong odor, which will further affect the sensory assessment. With respect to the curcumin nanoparticle, it had significantly improved water solubility, so that the beverage made therefrom had uniform system, thus achieving the highest comprehensive score 98.64.


Further, the experimental example 7 was described below to verify the anti-aging effect of the curcumin beverage provided herein.


Experimental Example 7 Anti-Aging Effect on Fruit Fly

Fruit fly was used as model, and median lethal time, average life span and maximum life span were used as indexes to evaluate the effect of the curcumin beverage on extending the life span of the fruit fly. Moreover, levels of SOD and MDA in the fruit fly were analyzed to preliminarily investigate the anti-aging mechanism of the curcumin beverage.


Preparation of Drosophila Medium


20 g of sucrose and 3 g of agar were dissolved in 300 mL of distilled water under stirring and boiled until the agar was completely dissolved to produce liquid A. 33 g of corn flour, 21.24 g of glucose and 4.5 g of soybean flour were dissolved in 200 mL of distilled water under stirring to produce liquid B. The liquid B was slowly poured into the liquid A, and the mixed liquid was boiled into a paste under continuous stirring. 0.125 g of paraben was dissolved with 1.25 mL of absolute ethanol and added to the paste. After cooled to about 75° C., the paste was added with 12.5 g of yeast powder, stirred thoroughly, added with 3.5 mL of propionic acid and stirred uniformly to produce the Drosophila medium. The medium was poured to several clean culture tubes each for 1.5-2 mL, and after the medium was completely solidified, the culture tube was invertedly placed on the operating desk for 24 h for the cultivation of fruit files.


Selection of Dose Gradient of Curcumin Beverage


Considering that the recommendation dose for humans was 0.0033 g/kg·bw·d, the daily amount of food and drinking water for a 60 kg person was set as 3000 g, based on which the experimental intermediate concentration was calculated according to the model required by the State Food and Drug Administration for health food. 1-2 concentration groups were respectively set above and below the intermediate concentration at 3-fold group interval, and a total of four dose groups were set. Moreover, one blank control group was set.


Experimental Method

300 male fruit flies and 300 female fruit flies emerged within 8 h were collected. The female and male fruit flies were distinguished by ether anesthesia. The fruit flies were randomly divided into five dose groups each consisting of 60 males and 60 females. They were placed in 2.5 cm×20 cm test tubes each for 20, and cultured at a relative humidity of 45%-75% and a temperature of 25±1° C., where the medium was replaced every four days to avoid fruit flies dying from food adhesion. The survival conditions and the number of deaths were recorded every day until all fruit flies died. The average life span, average highest life span (calculated based on the lifespan of the last ten survived fruit flies) and median lethal time were calculated for statistical analysis.


Data Analysis


The statistical analysis was performed at P<0.01 and P<0.05 using SPSS17.


Results


Influence of the Curcumin Beverage on the Lifespan of Fruit Fly


The median lethal time, average life span and average highest life span were used as indexes to evaluate the effect of the curcumin beverage on extending the life span of the fruit fly. The results were shown in Table 26.









TABLE 26







Influence of the curcumin drink on the lifespan of fruit fly















Additive









amount





Average



of the



Average
Average
extension



curcumin

Median
Average
highest
life
rate of the



beverage

lethal
life span (d)
life span (d)
extension
highest life


Sex
(%)
Number
time (d)
x ± s
x ± s
rate (%)
span (%)

















Female
0.0000
60
40
38.50 ± 6.75 
47.80 ± 1.53 





0.0022
60
44
38.85 ± 7.74*
50.04 ± 1.25*
0.91
4.69



0.0067
60
45
42.93 ± 4.51*
51.10 ± 1.11*
11.51
6.90



0.0201
60
46
 43.87 ± 7.97**
 52.01 ± 1.23**
13.95
8.81



0.0603
60
43
40.50 ± 9.12*
50.20 ± 1.13*
5.19
5.02


Male
0.0000
60
35
33.28 ± 7.32*
43.50 ± 1.58*





0.0022
60
37
35.23 ± 8.45*
 45.35 ± 0.85**
5.87
4.25



0.0067
60
40
38.03 ± 9.23*
47.46 ± 1.42*
14.17
9.10



0.0201
60
41
 38.83 ± 9.77**
 48.20 ± 1.29**
16.67
10.80 



0.0603
60
38
36.01 ± 8.20*
45.20 ± 1.12*
8.20
3.91





*significant at P < 0.05, and highly significant at P < 0.01.






It can be observed from Table 26 that the dose groups are significantly different from the control group in the average life span and average highest life span. The maximums of the average life span and the average highest life span were observed in the group treated with 0.0201% curcumin beverage.


In female fruit flies, the average life span and average highest life span of the 0.0201% dose group were (43.87±7.97) and (52.01±1.23) respectively, which were both higher than the control, and also significantly higher than the other groups. The life extension rates of the 0.0201% dose group reached 13.95% and 8.81%, respectively. The average highest life span of the 0.0022%, 0.0067% and 0.0603% groups was all higher than the control group. In male flies, the average life span and average highest life span of the 0.0201% dose group were (38.83±9.77) and (48.20±1.29), respectively, which were higher than the control group. The average life extension rates of the 0.0201% dose group were 16.67% and 10.80%, and the average life extension rates of the 0.0067 dose group were 14.17% and 9.10%. The average highest life span of all four dose groups was significantly higher than the control group. In addition, the 0.0201% dose group has a significant difference with the other groups in the average highest life span. Therefore, the curcumin beverage provided herein had the effect to extend the lifespan of fruit flies.


Influence of the Curcumin Beverage on the Antioxidase of Fruit Fly









TABLE 27







Influence of the curcumin beverage on the antioxidase of fruit fly










Additive














amount













of the




curcumin




beverage
SOD (U/mgprot)
MDA (nmol/mgprot)











(%)
Female
Male
Female
Male





0.0000
30.11 ± 1.05 
24.2 ± 30.77
1.21 ± 0.25 
1.27 ± 0.16 


0.0022
32.11 ± 1.03* 
26.51 ± 1.22* 
0.66 ± 0.03 
0.89 ± 0.09*


0.0067
33.84 ± 1.52* 
28.88 ± 1.28* 
0.55 ± 0.08 
0.59 ± 0.12*


0.0201
39.46 ± 1.12**
30.22 ± 1.12**
0.28 ± 0.02**
0.32 ± 0.01*


0.0603
32.01 ± 2.61**
27.69 ± 0.95* 
0.35 ± 0.02**
0.40 ± 0.05*





*Significant at P < 0.05, and highly significant at P < 0.01.






It can be seen from Table 27 that the dose groups were significantly from the control group in the activity of SOD and the content of MDA. The activity of SOD in male and female fruit flies was improved as the addition amount of the curcumin beverage in the medium increased. When the concentration of the curcumin beverage was 0.0201%, the activity of SOD in male and female fruit flies reached the maximum. In the meantime, the content of MDA in male and female fruit flies decreased as the concentration of the curcumin beverage in the medium increased. When the concentration of the curcumin beverage was 0.0201%, the content of MDA in male and female fruit flies reached the minimum. Therefore, for female fruit flies, the 0.0201% dose group had a significantly high activity of SOD and a significantly low content of MDA than the other dose groups. In male fruit flies, the activity of SOD and the content of MDA of 0.0201% dose group differed significantly from the control group.


In the drosophlia survival experiment, the median lethal time, average life span and average highest life span of the male and female fruit flies all increased along with the increase of the addition amount of the curcumin beverage, and all reached the maximum in the 0.0201% dose group. It indicated that the curcumin beverage can extend lifespan of fruit flies, exhibiting an anti-aging effect. As the additive amount of the curcumin beverage increased, the activity of SOD increased and the content of MDA decreased. When the addition amount of the curcumin beverage was 0.0201%, the activity of SOD reached the highest and the content of MDA reached the lowest. It demonstrated that the curcumin beverage exerted its anti-aging effect by increasing the activity of SOD and reducing the content of MDA.


The disclosure is not limited to the above embodiments. It should be understood that any replacement, change and modification made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the disclosure should fall within the scope of the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A curcumin nanoparticle, comprising: curcumin as core material; anda wall material;wherein a weight ratio of the curcumin to the wall material is (5.5-7.5):100; andthe wall material comprises gum arabic and zein in a weight ratio of (1-5):5.
  • 2. A method of preparing the curcumin nanoparticle of claim 1, comprising: (1) dissolving the zein with 85% ethanol followed by magnetic stirring for 1 h and centrifugation to remove insoluble impurities to produce a zein solution; and adding the curcumin to the zein solution followed by stirring for 30 min to produce a curcumin stock solution;(2) dissolving gum arabic with a 0.3 g/L zinc sulfate solution at 60° C. under stirring to produce an aqueous gum arabic stock solution, wherein the zinc sulfate solution is prepared by dissolving zinc sulfate with water in a water bath at 60° C., and a volume ratio of water in the aqueous gum arabic stock solution to ethanol in the curcumin stock solution is (1.5-3.5):1;(3) adding the curcumin stock solution to the aqueous gum arabic stock solution in a trickle manner followed by stirring for 30 min to produce a curcumin nanoparticle dispersion;(4) concentrating the curcumin nanoparticle dispersion obtained in step (3) by rotary evaporation to obtain a concentrated curcumin nanoparticle dispersion; and(5) subjecting the concentrated curcumin nanoparticle dispersion to freeze drying to produce the curcumin nanoparticle.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the volume ratio of the water in the aqueous gum arabic stock solution to the ethanol in the curcumin stock solution is 3:1.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein a weight ratio of curcumin to the wall material is (5.5-7.5):100, and a weight ratio of the gum arabic to the zein in the wall material is (1-5):5.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the weight ratio of curcumin to the wall material is 7:100, and the weight ratio of the gum arabic to the zein in the wall material is 4:5.
  • 6. A curcumin beverage, consisting of: 15% by weight of Tribute Citrus concentrate;0.05%-0.25% by weight of xanthan gum;0.2%-1% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle of claim 1;0.2%-1% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate;0.05%-0.25% by weight of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose;0.1% by weight of citric acid;10% by weight of xylitol; andwater.
  • 7. The curcumin beverage of claim 6, consisting of: 15% by weight of Tribute Citrus concentrate;0.15% by weight of xanthan gum;0.8% by weight of the curcumin nanoparticle;0.4% by weight of starch sodium octenyl succinate;0.15% by weight of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose;0.1% by weight of citric acid;10% by weight of xylitol; andwater.
  • 8. A method of preparing the curcumin beverage of claim 6, comprising: (1) peeling and coring Tribute Citrus fruits followed by squeezing with a juicer to produce a Tribute Citrus juice; filtering the Tribute Citrus juice twice with a double gauze to collect a filtrate; and concentrating the filtrate by rotary evaporation to a solid content of 70% to produce the Tribute Citrus concentrate;(2) mixing the curcumin nanoparticle, starch sodium octenyl succinate and the Tribute Citrus concentrate by stirring to obtain a first mixture;(3) homogenizing the first mixture obtained in step (2) by a homogenizer to obtain a first homogenized product;(4) compounding the first homogenized product obtained in step (3) with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, citric acid and xylitol to produce a second mixture;(5) homogenizing the second mixture obtained in step (4) by the homogenizer to obtain a second homogenized product;(6) heating the second homogenized product in a water bath at 80° C. for 15 min followed by degassing to obtain a degassed product; and(7) bottling and sterilizing the degassed product obtained in step (6) to produce the curcumin beverage.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein in step (3), the homogenization is performed at 25 MPa.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, in step (5), the homogenization is performed at 5 MPa.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, in step (7), the sterilization is performed at 121° C. for 10 min.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
202010467969.5 May 2020 CN national
US Referenced Citations (1)
Number Name Date Kind
20150004102 Salman et al. Jan 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
107712543 Feb 2018 CN
105456196 Dec 2018 CN
110393295 Nov 2019 CN
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Chen et al. Evaluation of the colloidal/chemical performance of core-shell nanoparticle formed by zein and gum Arabic. Colloids and Surfaces A 560 (2019): 130-135 (Year: 2019).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210369644 A1 Dec 2021 US