The present invention relates, in general, to document identification. More specifically, the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for detecting magnetic attributes of currency bills.
A variety of techniques and apparatus have been used to satisfy the requirements of automated currency handling systems. At the lower end of sophistication in this area of technology are systems capable of handling only a specific type of currency, such as a specific banknote (Euro or dollar) denomination, while rejecting all other currency types. At the upper end are complex systems which are capable of identifying and discriminating among and automatically counting multiple currency denominations.
Recent currency discriminating systems rely on comparisons between a scanned pattern obtained from a subject bill and sets of stored master patterns for the various denominations among which the system is designed to discriminate. There are a wide variety of bill sizes among different countries and even within the same currency system. Likewise, many other characteristics may vary between bills from different countries and of different denominations, such as, for example, the placement of a magnetic thread within the currency bills. The location of a magnetic thread within the currency bill and the information contained thereon can vary for different countries and different denominations as well as for different series of denominations.
Many types of currency bills possess magnetic attributes exhibiting magnetic properties which can be used to uniquely identify and/or authentic the currency bills. Examples of magnetic attributes include security threads exhibiting magnetic properties and ink exhibiting magnetic properties with which portions of some bills are printed. Many of these magnetic attributes have a very small dimension(s). For example, many magnetic threads have a width on the scale of millimeters. These security threads may be formed from an intermittent-magnetic pattern, such that the segments of magnetic and nonmagnetic material may characterize a code. These segments generally have a fixed or variable length and may form a code, which may be repeated along the magnetic thread.
Typically, the presence of—and the information in—the magnetic code is determined using difficult and often complex algorithms to reconstruct code from the data obtained from numerous data channels. Standard magnetic-thread authentication and decoding techniques require time shifting the magnetic-code data to account for the velocity differences between the bills as they pass by the scan head. Such a technique is time consuming and requires additional electronic circuitry to perform the time-shift calculations.
According to one example, a document processing device for processing a plurality of documents having a magnetic feature is disclosed. The document processing device includes a magnetization member adapted to create a magnetic field of sufficient strength to magnetize a magnetic feature of each of a plurality of documents. A magnetic sensor has a continuous track width of greater than about 50 millimeters. The magnetic sensor is adapted to produce a linear, analog output signal in response to the plurality of magnetic features moving past the magnetic sensor. A transport mechanism is adapted to move the plurality of documents past the magnetization member and the magnetic sensor. The transport mechanism includes an encoder adapted to provide positional data. A comparator is adapted to detect when the analog output of the magnetic sensor exceeds a threshold value. A digital circuit is adapted to record the positional data provided by the encoder. The digital circuit records the positional data in response to the analog output signal of the magnetic sensor exceeding the threshold value.
Another example is a method for processing a plurality of documents having at least one magnetic feature. The method includes the acts of magnetizing the at least one magnetic feature. A flux of each of the plurality of documents is sensed by a magnetic sensor. An analog signal along a single channel is generated by the magnetic sensor as the plurality of documents are in close proximity to the magnetic sensor. The analog signal is representative of the sensed flux. The generated analog signal along the single channel is monitored with at least one comparator to determine whether a threshold voltage has been exceeded. The analog signal is digitized by generating an output voltage in response to the threshold voltage being exceeded. The output voltage is independent of the analog signal and is digitized without the use of an analog-to-digital converter.
According to some examples, positional information for a magnetic feature on a document is determined by sensing the presence of a magnetic feature and tracking the number of counts from an encoder.
According to some examples, an integrated scan head is disclosed having a magnetic sensor, a threshold detector, and a digital circuit. In some embodiments, the integrated scan head is adapted to be incorporated into a document processing device.
The above summary is not intended to represent each embodiment, or, every aspect, of the present invention. Additional features and benefits of the present invention are apparent from the detailed description, figures, and appended claims set forth below.
a is a perspective view of an integrated scan head, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
b is an exploded perspective view of the integrated scan head of
a is a functional block diagram of a currency processing device, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
b is a functional block diagram of a currency processing device, according to another embodiment of the present invention.
a-d illustrate a digitization method for an analog magnetic signal generated by a magnetic sensor sensing a magnetic element, according to one embodiment of the present invention.
a-e illustrate a digitization method for an analog magnetic signal generated by a magnetic sensor sensing a magnetic element, according to another embodiment of the present invention.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments are shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Some embodiments of the present invention are directed to currency processing devices and methods for determining the denomination, authenticity, or other characteristic of a document by magnetically sensing a magnetic thread or other magnetic feature of the document. For example, a document may have a magnetic thread which is an intermittent-magnetic thread or other type of magnetic thread. The intermittent-magnetic thread may include magnetic and nonmagnetic segments that characterize a security code for the document. Alternatively, the magnetic thread may include magnetized portions having different thicknesses, different materials having different magnetic properties, or other means to characterize a code for the document. According to some embodiments, the magnetic thread is magnetically sensed by a single, continuous, wide-coverage, thin-film magnetic sensor. The currency processing device is adapted to determine the lengths or position of the differentiated segments (e.g., magnetic and nonmagnetic, etc.) and compare the determined lengths or positions with master data to verify the denomination and/or authenticity of the document.
Referring now to the drawings, and initially to
According to some embodiments, the magnetic sensor 12 is a single, continuous, wide-coverage, thin-film magnetic sensor. According to some embodiments of the present invention, the magnetic sensor 12 consists of a nonmagnetic substrate (about 0.5 mm thick) having a smooth, flat surface and a thin-film sensing element deposited thereon. The nonmagnetic substrate may be, for example, formed from silicon, alumina, silicon carbide, alumina-titanium carbide composite, Gadolinium Gallium Garnet (GGG), etc.
According to one embodiment, the magnetic sensor 12 is a magneto-resistive field sensor comprised of an active magnetic film (e.g., Permalloy, etc.) and associated current contacts to the PC board 14. In some embodiments, a magneto-resistive remanence field sensor is utilized for design simplicity. In alternative embodiments, the magnetic sensor 12 is an in-field sensor that reads the signal while applying a magnetic field. According to some embodiments, the magnetic sensor 12 is implemented in either a single element, a half-bridge configuration, or a full-bridge configuration, in alternative embodiments. The full-bridge configuration of the magnetic sensor 12 assists in providing enhanced linearity, increases the output signal, and minimizes common-mode magnetic field noise in a single electronic channel.
The magnetic sensor 12 includes stabilization means 38 adapted to eliminate Barkhausen instability. The stabilization means 38 assists in ensuring a linear response to excitation fields produced by an intermittent-magnetic thread 84 (
According to one embodiment, the track width (Ws) of the magnetic sensor 12 is at least about 2.5 inches (about 60 mm) wide. In some embodiments of the present invention, the track width of the magnetic sensor 12 is at least about 2 inches (about 50 mm) wide. Due to the large track width of the magnetic sensor 12, the magnetic sensor 12 is adapted to sense the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 (
The PC board 14 is in communication with the magnetic sensor 12 and is adapted to receive and interpret the data received from the magnetic sensor 12. The PC board 14 includes circuitry adapted to receive a signal from the magnetic sensor 12 that is indicative of the magnetic flux of a magnetic feature such as an intermittent-magnetic thread of a currency bill 80 (
The circuit formed on the PC board, in some embodiments, is analog from the sensor to one or more comparators located on the PC board 14. According to some embodiments, the PC board 14 does not include an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to process the analog signal. In some such embodiments, the digitization is done via level threshold detection. Such designs assist in reducing the cost and complexity associated with ADCs.
As will be described below with respect to
The PC board 14 is a printed circuit board and, in some embodiments, is an epoxy resin bonded glass fabric (ERBGF), such as FR-4 (Flame Resistant 4). In other embodiments, any suitable non-conductive material adapted for allowing an etched copper sheet to be laminated onto the substrate can be used.
The housing 18 is adapted to protect the magnetic sensor 12 and surrounds a portion of the magnetic sensor 12 and the PC board 14. The housing 18 allows the integrated scan head 10 to be mounted within a currency processing device (e.g., currency processing devices 100, 200). According to some embodiments, the housing 18 is composed of aluminum or plastic. The cover 22 is adapted to prevent the magnetic sensor 12 from being inadvertently contacted during operation and, in some embodiments, is composed of a nonmagnetic stainless steel or any suitable, thin, hard, wear-resistant material.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the fully assembled, integrated scan head 10—including the magnetic sensor 12, the PC board 14, the sensor housing 18, and the sensor cover 22—has a height (Hh) of about 1.1-1.2 inches (about 2.8-3.0 cm), a width (Wh) of about 6.4-6.6 inches (about 16.2-16.8 cm), and a length (Lh) of about 0.5-0.6 inches (about 1.2-1.5 cm). The height (Hh) is generally perpendicular to the plane of a passing currency bill 80 (
Turning now to
The currency bill 80 may be generally rectangular in shape and include a wide edge 96 and a narrow edge 98. The currency bill 80 has a length (Lb) and a width (Wb). Typically, the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 runs generally parallel to the narrow edge 98 of the currency bill 80. However, in alternative documents and currency bills, the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 may run generally parallel to the wide edge 96 of the currency bill. In still other embodiments, the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 may run serpentine or generally diagonally through the currency bill. Each of the magnetic and nonmagnetic portions 86, 88 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 has an associated length (Lm)
Referring to
According to some embodiments, all of the processed bills that have been denominated are transported to one, and only one, output pocket. According to other embodiments, all of the processed bills that have been authenticated are transported to one, and only one, output pocket. According to still other embodiments, all of the processed bills that have been denominated and authenticated are transported to one, and only one, output pocket. According to yet another embodiment, all of the processed bills that have been processed are transported to one, and only one, output pocket.
The single-pocket device 100 includes an operator interface 136 with a display 138 for communicating information to an operator of the device 100, and buttons 139 for receiving operator input. In alternative embodiments, the operator interface 136 may comprise a touch-screen-type interface or other interface. Additional details of the operational and mechanical aspects of single-pocket devices 100 are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,295,196 and 5,815,592, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
According to some embodiments, the single-pocket device 100 is compact and designed to be rested on a tabletop. The device 100 of
Referring now to
The two output receptacles 224a,b may be utilized in a variety of fashions according in various applications. For example, in the processing of currency bills, the bills may be directed to the first output receptacle 224a until a predetermined number of bills have been transported to the first output receptacle 224a (e.g., until the first output receptacle 224a reaches capacity or a strap limit) and then subsequent bills may be directed to the second output receptacle 224b. In another application, all bills are transported to the first output receptacle 224a except those bills triggering nonconforming error signals such as, for example, “no call” and “suspect document” error signals, which are transported to the second output receptacle 224b. The two-pocket device 200 includes operator interface 236 for communicating with an operator of the two-pocket device 200. Further details of the operational and mechanical aspects of the two-pocket device 200 are detailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,966,546; 6,278,795; and 6,311,819; each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The two-pocket device 200 is compact, and according to one embodiment, has a height (H2) of about 17.5 inches (about 44 cm), a width (W2) of about 13.5 inches (about 34 cm), and a depth (D2) of about 15 inches (about 38 cm), and weighs approximately 35 lbs. (about 16 kg). The two-pocket device 200 is compact and is designed to be rested upon a tabletop. The two-pocket device 200, according to one embodiment, has a footprint of less than about 200 in2 (about 1300 cm2) and occupies a volume of less than about 3500 in3 (about 58,000 cm3).
In yet other alternative embodiments of the present invention, the integrated scan head 10 of
According to various alternative embodiments, the currency processing devices (such as devices 100, 200) incorporating the magnetic scan head 10 are capable of processing currency at a rate from about 600 to over 1500 bills per minute. According to some embodiments, the currency processing devices (such as devices 100, 200) incorporating the magnetic scan head 10 are capable of processing currency at a rate of in excess of about 800 bills per minute. According to some embodiments, the currency processing devices (such as devices 100, 200) incorporating the magnetic scan head 10 are capable of processing currency at a rate of in excess of about 1000 bills per minute. According to some embodiments, the currency processing devices (such as devices 100, 200) incorporating the magnetic scan head 10 are capable of processing currency at a rate of in excess of about 1200 bills per minute. According to some embodiments, the currency processing devices (such as devices 100, 200) incorporating the magnetic scan head 10 are capable of processing currency at a rate of in excess of about 1500 bills per minute.
Turning now to
Before reaching the output receptacle 124, the transport mechanism 310 guides the currency bills past an evaluation region (not shown), which comprises one or more sensors (e.g., integrated scan head 10), where a currency bill can be, for example, analyzed, authenticated, denominated, counted, and/or otherwise processed. The results of the above process or processes are communicated to a user of the currency processing device 100 via the operator interface 136 (
A magnetization member 318 is located proximate a transport path defined by the transport mechanism 310. In the illustrated embodiment, a guide 324 is positioned between the magnetization member 318 and the transport mechanism 310 to assist in transporting the currency bills along the transport path near the magnetization member. According to some embodiments, the guide may be made from any nonmagnetic material (at least in the area proximate the magnetization member 318), such as aluminum. According to some embodiments, the magnetization member 318 should produce a constant magnetic field with a strength at the surface of the currency bill 80 that is larger than the field required to substantially saturate—or maximize the magnetization of—the magnetic material of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 (
In other embodiments of the present invention, the magnetization member 318 produces a constant magnetic field that is less than the field required to substantially saturate the magnetic material in the thread. The produced magnetic field is sufficient to magnetize the material of the thread so the magnetic material produces a magnetic field of a strength and polarity sufficient for a magnetic scanhead to detect the magnetic material. Where the magnetic material is included within an interment-magnetic thread 84 that includes denomination data encoded thereon, the magnetic field and polarity is sufficient to allow the scan head 10 to decode and denominate the currency bill 80.
In still other embodiments, the magnetization member 318 produces an alternating (variable) magnetic field of a defined frequency with a strength at the surface of the currency bill that is larger then the field required to substantially saturate the magnetic material of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 (
In yet other embodiments, the magnetization member 318 produces an alternating magnetic field that is less than the one required to substantially saturate the magnetic material. The alternating magnetic field is sufficient to magnetize the magnetic material so the magnetic materials produces a magnetic field of a strength and polarity sufficient for the magnetic scan head 10 to detect the magnetic material. Where the magnetic material is included within an interment-magnetic thread 84 that includes denomination data encoded thereon, the magnetic field and polarity is sufficient to allow the scan head 10 to decode and denominate the currency bill 80. As a currency bill 80 containing the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 passes the magnetization member 318—producing the alternating magnetic field—a magnetic pattern is recorded/encoded into the magnetic material (as illustrated, according to one embodiment, in
For standard currencies, for example, the saturation field can range in strength from about 0 Oe to in excess of about 3000 Oe depending on the magnetic properties of the bill to be examined. A reverse field can range in strength from about 0 Oe to in excess of about 3000 Oe as well. The magnetization member 318 can be designed to cover all or part of this range. According to one embodiment, a magnetization member 318 is provided that creates a field from about 750 Oe to in excess of about 1500 Oe, and in some embodiments, a magnetization member 318 is provided that creates a field of about 1000 Oe. According to still other embodiments, the magnetization member 318 creates a field from about 3,000 Oe to about 5,000 Oe. According to yet other embodiments, the magnetization member 318 creates a field greater than about 5,000 Oe. According to some embodiments of the present invention, even greater field strengths may be utilized depending on the material to be magnetized.
The magnetization member 318 may be any suitable magnet sufficient to generate the desired magnetizating field. For example, the magnetization member 318 may be a permanent magnet constructed of any hard magnetic material, such as AlNiCo 5, 7 or 9, SmCo (samarium cobalt), NdFeB (Neodymium Iron Boron), etc. Alternatively, the magnetization member 318 may be an electromagnetic device (or a combination of a permanent magnet and an electromagnetic device) that can be adjusted to generate the desired magnetizing field.
In another embodiment, the magnetization member 318 may be a recording head when a variable magnetic field is desired. In yet another embodiment, where a variable magnetic field is desired, the magnetization member 318 may be a roller recorder. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,691,682 and 6,233,407, further discuss roller recorders and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In one group of embodiments, the magnetic field produced by an electromagnetic device is a constant field, while in another group of embodiments, the magnetic field produced by the electromagnetic device is an alternating magnetic field.
According to one embodiment, the magnetization member 318 is a permanent magnet having a width of about 3.0 inches (about 75 mm), a length of about 0.18 inches (about 4.6 mm), a height of about 0.12 inches (about 3.2 mm), and a remnant magnetization (Mr) of about 1000 emu/cm3. In this embodiment, the distance from the magnetization member 318 to the currency bill may vary from about 0.06 inches (1.5 mm) to about 0.14 inches (3.5 mm) with an average distance of 0.98 inches (2.5 mm). Further, it should be obvious to those skilled in the art that any magnet wider than about 3.0 inches (about 75 mm) and other magnets having various widths, lengths, heights, and remanent magnetization can be used for the magnetization member 318.
According to other embodiments, the magnetization member 318 is an electromagnetic device having a magnetizing width of about 3.0 inches (about 75 mm) or wider. According to one embodiment, the distance between the electromagnetic magnetization member to the currency bill may vary from about 0.06 inches (1.5 mm) to about 0.14 inches (3.5 mm) with an average distance of 0.98 inches (2.5 mm).
According to some embodiments, the direction of the magnetic field produced by the magnetization member 318 is parallel to the height (e.g., perpendicular to the plane of the document) of the magnetization member 318. According to some other embodiments, the direction of the magnetic field produced by the magnetization member 318 is parallel to the length of the magnetization member 318. It should be understood by those skilled in the art that magnetization members 318 of varying size, shape, strength, and producing different field strength and field direction can be utilized to satisfy the magnetizing needs of a particular document (or magnetic portion thereof), as described above.
The magnetization member 318 is located along the transport path upstream from the integrated scan head 10. In some embodiments, the separation distance between the magnetization member 318 and the integrated scan head 10 (where the integrated scan head 10 is a remanent, anisotropic, magneto-resistive field sensor) is selected to avoid interference in the integrated scan head 10 due to the magnetic field created by the magnetization member 318. In some of these embodiments, the magnetization member 318 is located at least about 1 inch (about 2.5 cm) upstream from the integrated scan head 10, and in certain embodiments, the magnetization member 318 is located at least about 2.4 inches (about 6 cm) upstream from the integrated scan head 10.
Referring now to
Referring now to
A stack of currency (not shown) may be deposited into an input receptacle 613 that holds the currency and allows the bills in the stack to be conveyed one at a time through the currency processing device 600. After the bills are conveyed to the interior of the currency processing device 600, at least a portion of the bill passes the magnetization member 618 and is then magnetically scanned by the scan head 610. The scan head 610 may be an integrated scan head (such as, for example, the integrated scan head 10 of
Similar to
According to some embodiments, the analog signal from the magnetic sensor passes through an amplifier circuit, which may include a bandpass filter. The bandpass filter is tuned/optimized to recognize the frequency of the pattern encoded by the magnetization member into the magnetic portion(s) 86 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84. The filtered analog signal is then sent to the threshold circuit, which includes a comparator. Generally, the output from the bandpass filter is essentially zero when a nonmagnetic portion 88 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 passes by the scan head (see, e.g.,
According to some embodiments, the digital circuit 660 saves the count data to a memory 664, such as a random access memory (“RAM”) or other memory device, forming a set of count data that corresponds to the object scanned. According to some embodiments, the digital circuit 660 determines the denomination of the currency bill 80 by comparing the count data for the various magnetic and nonmagnetic sections 86, 88 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 to stored master data stored for genuine currency bills. According to some embodiments, the stored master data is located in a look-up table.
According to some embodiments, the count data stored in the memory 664 is compared by the digital circuit 660 to master count data stored in a memory 668, such as a read only memory (“ROM”), a RAM, or other memory device. The stored master data corresponds to magnetic data generated from genuine currency of a plurality of denominations. The count data stored on the memory 668 may represent various orientations of genuine currency to account for the possibility of a bill in the stack being in a reversed orientation compared to other bills in the stack. The digital circuit 660 communicates the determined denomination for the currency bill 80 to the microprocessor 640.
If the count data generated by the bill being evaluated does not fall within an acceptable limit of any of the master data stored in the memory 668, the bill is determined to be of an unknown denomination or other nonconforming document by the digital circuit 660. The digital circuit 660 communicates this information to the microprocessor 640, which, in some embodiments, can stop the currency processing device 600 to allow removal of the nonconforming document from the stack of currency or the currency processing device 600. Specifically, the microprocessor 640 can halt the operation of the currency processing device 600 (by utilizing the data provided by the encoder 644) such that when the currency processing device 600 is stopped, the unknown bill is the last bill transported to the output receptacle and/or is atop of the accumulated stack of currency bills in the output receptacle 624.
Furthermore, the currency processing device 600, and specifically the microprocessor 640 may desirably include the capability to maintain a running total of genuine currency of each denomination and/or an aggregate total for the stack of currency denominated.
Turning now to
Once the currency bill 80, and more specifically, the intermittent-magnetic thread 84, has been sufficiently magnetized, a magnetic scan is performed, at step 418, by the magnetic sensor 612. The threshold circuit 656 monitors the analog output from the magnetic sensor 612, via the amplifier circuit 652, and a determination is made at decision box 422 whether a first transition has exceeded a predetermined threshold level such as a voltage level of fifty percent of the rail (e.g., ±6V). The first transition is indicative of the leading edge (or other portion) of the first detected magnetic segment 86 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84, as will be explained further with respect to
If the first transition has not exceeded the predetermined threshold, the scan head 610 continues to sense the flux of passing currency bills 80 and the threshold circuit 656 continues to monitor the generated voltage at step 418. Once the first transition has been detected, the digital circuit 660 begins to track the counts provided by the encoder 644 and thereby to measure the length of a magnetic segment. By utilizing the encoder 644 count to track the magnetic and nonmagnetic segments 86, 88, the currency processing device 600 is able to process the currency bills 80 independent of the speed of a transport mechanism. Thus, the scan head 610 incorporated into the currency processing device 600 is able to process documents both at extremely high speeds as well as extremely low speeds.
The digital circuit 660 continues to track the counts by the encoder 644, at step 426, until a determination is made at decision box 430 that a pulse—of opposite polarity from the first transition pulse—has exceeded a predetermined threshold voltage (e.g., −6V). This opposite-polarity pulse designates the transition from a magnetic segment 86 to a nonmagnetic segment 88. Therefore, the counts by the encoder 644 during the interim period between the detection of the initial threshold current and the opposite-polarity threshold current represents the length of the first magnetic segment 86 on the intermittent-magnetic thread 84.
Once the determination has been made that the opposite-polarity pulse has been detected, the digital circuit 660 stores the tracked counts in the memory 664, at step 434. The digital circuit 660 again tracks the counts provided by the encoder 644, at step 438. However, the newly tracked count represents a nonmagnetic segment 88, as opposed to the previously tracked magnetic segment 86. The digital circuit 660 continues to track the encoder 644 counts until the next transition threshold, of opposite polarity, occurs. Once the determination has been made at decision box 442 that the next transition pulse has exceeded the threshold voltage (e.g., +6V), the encoder counts for the nonmagnetic section 88 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 are stored in the memory 664 at step 446. The digital circuit 660 tracks the counts provided by the encoder 644, at step 450, representing the length of a second magnetic segment 86 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84.
The digital circuit 660 continues to track the counts by the encoder 644, at step 450, until a determination is made at decision box 454 that a pulse—of opposite polarity from the first transition pulse—has exceeded the predetermined threshold voltage (e.g., −6V). This opposite-polarity pulse designates the transition from a second magnetic segment 86 to a second nonmagnetic segment 88. The digital circuit 660 stores the tracked counts for the second magnetic segment 86 in the memory 664, at step 458. The above process continues until the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 has been entirely scanned, or in alternative embodiments, until a predetermined length or number of segments have been scanned.
Once the determination is made at decision box 462 that the scan for the particular currency bill 80 is complete, the lengths represented by the stored counts are compared to the standard lengths for valid currency at step 470. It should be understood that the stored counts are directly representative of a length, as the encoder 644 is adapted to provide a single count when the encoder 644 has rotated a specific distance. This distance represents the distance traveled by the currency bill 80 through the currency processing device, as the encoder 644 is integrated into the transport mechanism. The standard segment lengths for various currency may be stored in the memory 668 in the form of a look-up table. According to some embodiments, the look-up table includes the standard lengths for the magnetic and/or nonmagnetic segments 86, 88 of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 for each denomination of currency that is to be accommodated by the currency processing device 600.
If the lengths of the magnetic and nonmagnetic segments 86, 88 do not favorably compare with the master data, the currency bill 80 is flagged as a nonconforming document by notifying (e.g., sending an error signal to) the microprocessor 640 at step 482. The microprocessor 640 may then determine whether to off-sort the nonconforming document to an alternative output receptacle (if any), whether to stop the currency processing device 600 with the nonconforming document on top of the stack in the output receptacle 624, stop the currency processing device 600 with the nonconforming document in a predetermined or known location, or continue processing the plurality of currency bills 80. Alternatively, if the length data sufficiently agrees with or matches the master data, the currency bill 80 is determined to be authentic and/or the denomination information is sent from the digital circuitry 660 to the microprocessor 640 at step 474. The processed currency bill 80 is then fed to the output receptacle 624 at step 478 and the next document is scanned as discussed above.
The sensitivity of the device can be adjusted by changing the allowed deviation between the determined length (or count) information of the document being processed and the stored master length (or count) information in memory such as in a look-up table. As the allowed deviation is reduced, the sensitivity of the device is increased. U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,503, further discusses setting the sensitivity of a currency processing device and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
As discussed above, by utilizing the encoder 644 count to track the magnetic and nonmagnetic segments 86, 88, the currency processing device 600 is able to process the currency bills 80 independent of the speed of a transport mechanism (e.g., 310). Thus, a scan head incorporated into a currency processing device is able to process documents both at extremely high speeds as well as extremely low speeds.
For example, according to some embodiments, a transport mechanism is able to transport currency bills 80 at a low speed of approximately 0.002 inches per second (approximately 0.05 mm per second) to a maximum speed of about 100 inches per second (about 254 cm per second). These speeds translate to a typical processing speed of less than 1 bill per minute to about 2000 notes per minute. The scan head 10 of the present invention is able to process currency bills 80 throughout this range. Additionally, because transport mechanisms are continually being developed that attempt to transport currency bills at even higher speeds, it should be noted that the scan head 10 of the present invention is adapted to process bills at higher speeds as well. It is believed that, if a proper transport mechanism were developed, the integrated scan head 10 of the present invention could easily process at speeds of about 500 inches per second (about 1270 cm per second), which translates to about 10,000 notes per minute.
The above process has been specifically detailed for an intermittent-magnetic thread 84 having at least two magnetic segments 86 and at least one nonmagnetic segment 88 separating the two magnetic segments 86. It should be understood, however, that the present invention is operational on intermittent-magnetic threads 84 having any number of magnetic and nonmagnetic segments 86, 88 of various sizes, shapes, and locations. Additionally, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to intermittent-magnetic threads but can be utilized to analyze any magnetic document so long as the coercivity of the magnetic portions of the document is such that the document is capable of being magnetized for an adequate length of time to sufficiently analyze the documents. It should also be noted that additional processing, evaluating, authenticating, and/or denominating techniques, scan heads, and sensors may be used in combination with the above-described scan head and process.
Turning now to
As illustrated in
A digital circuit (e.g., the digital circuit 660) begins tracking a number of counts 832 generated by an encoder output 830 illustrated in
As the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 continues to move in the transport direction, the middle of the magnetic segment 86a aligns with the magnetic sensor causing the analog output signal 810 of the magnetic sensor to go to essentially zero. The intermittent-magnetic thread 84 continues to move in the transport direction and the middle portion of the magnetic segment 86a begins to move away from the magnetic sensor, causing the voltage of the analog output signal 810 to decrease further (or, in some embodiments, increase further). Once the analog output signal 810 has been reduced (or, in some embodiments, increased) below the negative threshold voltage (or, in some embodiments the positive threshold voltage) at point C, at least one of the comparators in the threshold circuit detects that the output voltage has reached the negative threshold voltage 812b and generates a positive output voltage 820b representing a binary 1 in some embodiments.
As the intermittent-magnetic thread 84 continues to move in the transport direction, the magnetic segment 86a moves away from the magnetic sensor, causing the voltage of the analog output signal 810 of the magnetic sensor to increase (or, in some embodiments, decrease). Once the analog output signal 810 has been increased (or, in some embodiments, reduced) below the threshold voltage, at point D, the positive output voltage of the output signal 820b returns to zero, representing a binary 0 in some embodiments. In one embodiment, the digital circuit ceases tracking the number of counts 832 generated by the encoder output 830.
The number of counts 832 in the tracked group 834 of counts 832 is determined by the digital circuit. The number of counts 832 in the tracked group 834 can then be compared to master data stored in a memory. The number of counts 832 in the tracked group 834 is indicative of the length (Lm) of the magnetic segment 86a of the intermittent-magnetic thread 84.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the digital circuit tracks the number of encoder counts 832 from point A through point D. According to another embodiment, the digital circuit tracks the number of encoder counts 832 from point A through point C. According to still another embodiment, the digital circuit tracks the number of encoder counts 832 from point B through point D. According to yet another embodiment, the digital circuit tracks the number of encoder counts 832 from a median point of points A and B through a median point of points C and D, such as in tracked group 834a. In the various embodiments, the master data is obtained from known genuine documents between the same points used by the digital circuit.
Turning now to
An analog signal 910 from a magnetic sensor (e.g., magnetic sensor 612) passes through an amplifier circuit, which may include a bandpass filter. The bandpass filter is tuned/optimized to recognize the frequency of the pattern of the magnetically-encoded, magnetic segments 87. The filtered analog signal is then sent to the threshold circuit, which includes a comparator. Generally, the output from the bandpass filter is essentially zero when a nonmagnetic portion 88 of the magnetically-encoded, intermittent-magnetic thread 85 passes by the magnetic sensor. Alternatively, the output from the bandpass filter is generally of a certain nonzero amplitude when a magnetically-encoded, magnetic segment 87 is sensed by the magnetic sensor.
Once a threshold detector detects the output from the bandpass filter to have exceeded a predetermined threshold, an output voltage 920 is generated by the threshold detector, which, in some embodiments, represents a binary 1. A digital circuit recognizes the output voltage 920 and begins to track the number of counts 932 generated by an encoder output 930. As discussed above with respect to
While the embodiments discussed in this patent have focused on the denomination of currency bills, according to alternative embodiments, this invention is applicable to the authentication, discrimination, evaluation, examination, differentiation, verification, identification, or recognizition of any article having a magnetic security feature, such as, for example, banking documents, travel documents, checks, deposit slips, coupons and loan payment documents, food stamps, cash tickets, savings withdrawal tickets, check deposit slips, savings deposit slips, traveler checks, lottery tickets, casino tickets, passports, visas, driver licenses, and/or all other documents utilized as a proof of deposit at financial institutions.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments and methods thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but, to the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention and the appended claims.
A document processing device for processing a plurality of documents having a magnetic feature, the document processing device comprising:
a magnetization member adapted to create a magnetic field of sufficient strength to magnetize a magnetic feature of each of a plurality of documents;
a magnetic sensor having a continuous track width of greater than about 50 millimeters, the magnetic sensor being adapted to produce a linear, analog output signal in response to the plurality of magnetic features moving past the magnetic sensor;
a transport mechanism adapted to move the plurality of documents past the magnetization, member and the magnetic sensor, the transport mechanism including an encoder adapted to provide positional data;
at least one comparator adapted to detect when the analog output of the magnetic sensor exceeds a threshold value; and
at least one digital circuit adapted to record the positional data provided by the encoder, the at least one digital circuit recording the positional data in response to the analog output signal of the magnetic sensor exceeding the threshold value.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is a permanent magnet.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is an electromagnetic device.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is a combination of a permanent magnet and an electromagnetic device.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is adapted to create a constant magnetic field.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is adapted to create an alternating magnetic field.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment F, wherein the magnetization member is adapted to encode a pattern on the magnetic feature.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment G, further comprising: a bandpass filter tuned to recognize a frequency of the pattern encoded by the magnetization member into the magnetic feature.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic sensor is a magneto-resistive field sensor.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the threshold value is a predetermined voltage.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic sensor includes a nonmagnetic substrate having a thin-film sensing element deposited thereon.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic sensor is a half-bridge configuration.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic sensor is a full-bridge configuration.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is incorporated into the magnetic sensor.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetization member is located upstream from the magnetic sensor.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment O, wherein the magnetization member is located sufficiently far upstream from the magnetic sensor to avoid interfering with the magnetic sensor.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic feature is a magnetic thread.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic feature is an intermittent-magnetic thread.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment R, wherein the intermittent-magnetic thread includes highly magnetized and lesser magnetized segments.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment R, wherein the intermittent-magnetic thread includes magnetic segments and nonmagnetic segments.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment T, wherein the magnetization member is adapted to encode pattern on the magnetic segments of the intermittent-magnetic thread.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the plurality of documents is a plurality of currency bills.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment V, wherein the positional data for the magnetic feature is utilized to denominate the currency bills.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment V, wherein the positional data for the magnetic feature is utilized to authenticate the currency bills.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment V, wherein the positional data for the magnetic feature is utilized to denominate and authenticate the currency bills.
The document processing device of Alternative Embodiment A, wherein the magnetic sensor has a scan width of greater than about 60 millimeters.
A method for processing a plurality of documents having at least one magnetic feature, the method comprising the acts of:
magnetizing the plurality of at least one magnetic features;
sensing a flux of each of the plurality of documents, the flux being sensed by a magnetic sensor;
generating an analog signal along a single channel, the analog signal being generated by the magnetic sensor as the plurality of documents are in close proximity to the magnetic sensor, the analog signal being representative of the sensed flux;
monitoring with at least one comparator the generated analog signal along the single channel to determine whether a threshold voltage has been exceeded;
digitizing the analog signal by generating an output voltage in response to the threshold voltage being exceeded, the output voltage being independent of the analog signal, the analog signal being digitized without the use of an analog-to-digital converter.
The present application claims priority from and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/716,182 filed Mar. 9, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,762,380, which in turn claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/781,286, filed Mar. 9, 2006 and hereby incorporates these applications by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4399553 | Toyama | Aug 1983 | A |
4518919 | Ishida | May 1985 | A |
5140368 | Szlucha | Aug 1992 | A |
5163672 | Mennie | Nov 1992 | A |
5207788 | Geib et al. | May 1993 | A |
5266786 | Mazumder | Nov 1993 | A |
5295196 | Raterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5467405 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5467406 | Graves et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
D369984 | Larsen | May 1996 | S |
5633949 | Graves et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640463 | Csulits | Jun 1997 | A |
5652802 | Graves et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5687963 | Mennie | Nov 1997 | A |
5692067 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5704491 | Graves | Jan 1998 | A |
5724438 | Graves | Mar 1998 | A |
5751840 | Raterman et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761089 | McInerny | Jun 1998 | A |
5790693 | Graves et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790697 | Munro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806650 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815592 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822448 | Graves et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832104 | Graves et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5867589 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870487 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875259 | Mennie et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5905810 | Jones et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909502 | Mazur | Jun 1999 | A |
5909503 | Graves et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5912982 | Munro et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5938044 | Weggesser | Aug 1999 | A |
5943655 | Jacobsen | Aug 1999 | A |
5960103 | Graves et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966456 | Jones et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982918 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992601 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012565 | Mazur | Jan 2000 | A |
6021883 | Casanova et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026175 | Raterman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028951 | Raterman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6068194 | Mazur | May 2000 | A |
6072896 | Graves et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073744 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074334 | Mennie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6128402 | Jones et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139065 | Washburn et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6220419 | Mennie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237739 | Mazur et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241069 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256407 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278795 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6311819 | Stromme et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318537 | Jones et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6351551 | Munro et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363164 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371303 | Klein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378683 | Mennie | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6381354 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398000 | Jenrick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6459806 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460705 | Hallowell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493461 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6539104 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560355 | Graves et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6588569 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601687 | Jenrick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603872 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621919 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628816 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6636624 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6647136 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650767 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654486 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661910 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665431 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678401 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678402 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6705470 | Klein et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721442 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724926 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724927 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6731785 | Mennie et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6731786 | Jones et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748101 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6778693 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6798899 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810137 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6843418 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6860375 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6866134 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868954 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880692 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6913130 | Mazur et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6913260 | Maier et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6915893 | Mennie | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929109 | Klein et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6955253 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6957733 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959800 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6962247 | Maier et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6980684 | Munro et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6994200 | Jenrick et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6996263 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000828 | Jones | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016767 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036651 | Tam et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082216 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092560 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103206 | Graves et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7103438 | Hallowell et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7146245 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149336 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7158662 | Chiles | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171032 | Jones et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187795 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191657 | Maier et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197173 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200255 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201320 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7232024 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7248731 | Raterman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256874 | Csulits et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269279 | Chiles | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7349566 | Jones et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362891 | Jones et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366338 | Jones et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7391897 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7505831 | Jones et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7536046 | Raterman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542598 | Jones et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7551764 | Chiles et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7590274 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591428 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599543 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7600626 | Hallowell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602956 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
5909503 | Graves et al. | Nov 2009 | C1 |
7619721 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620231 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
5966456 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | C1 |
6381354 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2009 | C1 |
7628326 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7635082 | Jones | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7647275 | Jones | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650980 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7672499 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7686151 | Renz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7726457 | Maier et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735621 | Hallowell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753189 | Maier et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762380 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778456 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779982 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010006557 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010015311 | Mennie | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019624 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010035603 | Graves et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001393 | Jones et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020020603 | Jones et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056605 | Mazur et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020085245 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020085745 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103757 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104785 | Klein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107801 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118871 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122580 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126885 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020126886 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131630 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136442 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020145035 | Jones | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154804 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154805 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154806 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154807 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154808 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020186876 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009420 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015395 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030015396 | Mennie | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030059098 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030062242 | Hallowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081824 | Mennie et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108233 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121752 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030121753 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132281 | Jones et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139994 | Jones | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030168308 | Maier et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174874 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182217 | Chiles | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198373 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202690 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003980 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016621 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040016797 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028266 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040083149 | Jones | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040145726 | Csulits et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040149538 | Sakowski | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153408 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040154964 | Jones | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173432 | Jones | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182675 | Long et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040251110 | Jenrick et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050029168 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035034 | Long et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050040225 | Csulits et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047642 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060055 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060059 | Klein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060061 | Jones | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077142 | Tam et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086271 | Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087422 | Maier et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108165 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117791 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
20050117792 | Graves et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
20050150738 | Hallowell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163361 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163362 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169511 | Jones | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050173221 | Maier et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183928 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050207634 | Jones et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213803 | Mennie | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050241909 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249394 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265591 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276458 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278239 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010071 | Jones et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060078186 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060182330 | Chiles | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195567 | Mody et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210137 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060274929 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070071302 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076939 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070078560 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070095630 | Mennie et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112674 | Jones et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122023 | Jenrick et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070172107 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070209904 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070221470 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237381 | Mennie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258633 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269097 | Chiles et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278064 | Hallowell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080006505 | Renz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033829 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044077 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060906 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080123932 | Jones et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133411 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177420 | Klein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080219543 | Csulits et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080285838 | Jones et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090001661 | Klein et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090022390 | Yacoubian et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090087076 | Jenrick | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090090779 | Freeman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090310188 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313159 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100034454 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051687 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100057617 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063916 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100092065 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100108463 | Renz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116619 | Jones | May 2010 | A1 |
20100163366 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 624 638 | Dec 2007 | CA |
2 684 159 | Apr 2010 | CA |
0342062 | Nov 1989 | EP |
2 464 826 | May 2010 | GB |
WO 9111778 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9217394 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9323824 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO 9524691 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9610800 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9636933 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9730422 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9743734 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9745810 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9812662 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9813785 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9824052 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9824067 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9835323 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9840839 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9847100 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 9850892 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9909511 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9914668 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9923601 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9941695 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9948040 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9948042 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0024572 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0065546 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0108108 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0159685 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0159723 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0229735 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02054360 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03005312 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03028361 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03029913 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03030113 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03067532 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 03107282 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004010367 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004027717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004036508 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004038631 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004068422 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005013209 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005017842 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005028348 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005029240 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005036445 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005041134 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076229 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2006039439 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006076289 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006076634 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007044570 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007120825 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2007143128 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008030356 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008112132 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100263984 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60781286 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11716182 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 12819579 | US |